Search

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) has evolved as a novel and effective therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea. Despite positive published outcomes of HGNS, there exist uncertainties regarding proper patient selection, surgical technique, and the reporting of outcomes and individual factors that impact therapy effectiveness. According to current guidelines, this therapy is indicated for select patients, and recommendations are based on the Stimulation Therapy for Apnea Reduction or STAR trial. Ongoing research and physician experiences continuously improve methods to optimize the therapy. An understanding of the way in which airway anatomy, obstructive sleep apnea phenotypes, individual health status, psychological conditions, and comorbid sleep disorders influence the effectiveness of HGNS is essential to improve outcomes and expand therapy indications. This article presents discussions on current evidence, future directions, and research gaps for HGNS therapy from the 10th International Surgical Sleep Society expert research panel. CITATION: Suurna MV, Jacobowitz O, Chang J, et al. Improving outcomes of hypoglossal nerve stimulation therapy: current practice, future directions and research gaps. Proceedings of the 2019 International Sleep Surgery Society Research Forum. J Clin Sleep Med. 2021;17(12):2477–2487.

The purpose of the review is to provide background on palatal anatomy and phenotypes to better model the complex upper airway structure. Review of the literature identifies limited data on upper airway phenotypes and the associated palatal anatomy. The majority of literature evaluates sites of obstruction based on sedated endoscopy without describing the pharyngeal lumen and its characteristics. Upper airway anatomy is associated with different patterns and airway configurations. These can be described and may represent specific phenotypes. Additional research is needed to associate phenotypes with disease and treatment outcomes.

BackgroundEvaluation and interpretation of the literature on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) allows for consolidation and determination of the key factors important for clinical management of the adult OSA patient. Toward this goal, an international collaborative of multidisciplinary experts in sleep apnea evaluation and treatment have produced the International Consensus statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (ICS:OSA). MethodsUsing previously defined methodology, focal topics in OSA were assigned as literature review (LR), evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBR-R) formats. Each topic incorporated the available and relevant evidence which was summarized and graded on study quality. Each topic and section underwent iterative review and the ICS:OSA was created and reviewed by all authors for consensus. ResultsThe ICS:OSA addresses OSA syndrome definitions, pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors for disease, screening methods, diagnostic testing types, multiple treatment modalities, and effects of OSA treatment on multiple OSA-associated comorbidities. Specific focus on outcomes with positive airway pressure (PAP) and surgical treatments were evaluated. ConclusionThis review of the literature consolidates the available knowledge and identifies the limitations of the current evidence on OSA. This effort aims to create a resource for OSA evidence-based practice and identify future research needs. Knowledge gaps and research opportunities include improving the metrics of OSA disease, determining the optimal OSA screening paradigms, developing strategies for PAP adherence and longitudinal care, enhancing selection of PAP alternatives and surgery, understanding health risk outcomes, and translating evidence into individualized approaches to therapy.

Introduction Nasal obstruction is a common patient complaint in the sleep clinic. The nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale is a validated questionnaire to assess symptoms and quality of life. However, it has weaknesses when evaluating patients in the sleep clinic because it does not differentiate awake and sleep related nasal obstruction. Our primary goal was to compare the old NOSE scale to a new sleep NOSE scale that separates awake and sleep related nasal obstruction. Methods A retrospective study was completed to compare the known NOSE scale (old NOSE) with a revised clinical scale more relevant to the sleep clinic (new sleep NOSE and new awake NOSE). 169 adult participants completed the 3 scales in a sleep clinic specializing in otolaryngologic interventions. The collected data compared median scores (Wilcoxon’s signed rank test), agreement (Cohen’s kappa), and correlation (Spearman correlation). Wald’s test was also used to compare the scores between subgroups of insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Results The old NOSE scale scores were not significantly different from the sleep NOSE score (p=0.4) but was significantly different from the awake NOSE scale (p< 0.001). The new sleep NOSE scores were also significantly higher than then awake NOSE scores (p Conclusion This study suggests that in the sleep clinic setting, patients score the NOSE scale according to sleep related obstruction. In addition, insomnia patients relate more nighttime than daytime nasal obstruction. Further studies are needed to determine if the NOSE scale needs to be revised to better encompass nasal complaints related to sleep. Support (if any)

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) therapy is now an established and widely-available obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treatment alternative for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)-intolerant patients. Additionally, the HNS body of literature is robust with strong data on safety, efficacy, and durability—from the 5-year STAR Trial outcomes, to post-approval studies of independent institutions, to the multicenter ADHERE registry which recently reported outcomes on over 1,000 patients and is poised to enroll 5,000 HNS patients total. Nevertheless, now with thousands of implanted patients across hundreds of certified centers, and that number growing rapidly, the post-implant management of the HNS patient represents the next critical frontier. Post-implant patient management (therapy titration, troubleshooting, adjustments, and adherence monitoring) across a longitudinal care model is key to ensuring long-term therapy success and optimizing patient outcomes and health benefits. As with CPAP, patient education and close clinical monitoring are often essential to successful long-term management. Although many HNS patients are clear responders with excellent comfort and adherence as well as effective improvement in symptomatic and objective outcome measures, and even a smaller subset is clear non-responders, there is a growing body of patients somewhere in the middle: good outcomes but not great; partial but incomplete response. These are the patients in whom a standardized best-practice approach to treatment monitoring and targeted therapy modifications is likely critical to optimizing long-term outcomes.

The goal of this review is to advance the understanding of the muscular and soft tissue palatal anatomy as it relates to palatal surgery for sleep apnea and the phenotypic variations that generate the shape and collapsibility of the retropalatal airway. Anatomically, the soft palate has both a proximal and distal segments separated by the palatal genu. The proximal palatal segment has a variable angle from the hard palate (ie, alpha angle) determined by the position and length of the levator veli palatini muscle. The palatopharyngeus muscle (PP) is a major defining element of the palate and lateral pharyngeal wall and forms the medial wall of the lateral palatal space. It is composed of two divisions: the longitudinal palatopharyngeus fasciculi which acts to elevate the pharynx and depress the soft palate and the transverse palatopharyngeus fascicle (Passavant's ridge) which function is a nasopharyngeal sphincter. The lateral palatal space incorporates the supra-tonsilar fat, and is bounded by muscles that determine the structure of the palate and associated lateral pharyngeal walls. Understanding of palatal muscles and pharyngeal airway phenotypes provides insight into the steps and mechanisms of pharyngoplasty procedures. Level of evidence N/A.

Objective To evaluate the association between findings of blinded reviews of preoperative drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) examinations using the VOTE Classification and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) surgical outcomes in a large multicenter, international cohort. Methods Retrospective, multi-center cohort study of adults without tonsillar hypertrophy who underwent pharyngeal surgery for OSA. The study included only participants without enlarged tonsils. Four independent reviewers performed blinded review of preoperative DISE videos using the VOTE Classification system and scoring of a primary structure contributing to airway obstruction. DISE findings were examined for an association with surgical outcomes with univariate analyses and multiple regression. Results Two hundred seventy-five study participants were included from 14 centers. Mean age was 51.4 ± 11.8 years, and body mass index was 30.1 ± 5.2 kg/m2 . There was moderate interrater reliability (kappa = 0.40-0.60) for DISE findings. Oropharyngeal lateral wall-related obstruction was associated with poorer surgical outcomes (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.51; 95% CI 0.27, 0.93). Complete tongue-related obstruction was associated with a lower odds of surgical response in moderate to severe OSA (AOR 0.52; 95% CI 0.28, 0.98), with findings that were similar but not statistically significant in other analyses. Surgical outcomes were not clearly associated with the degree and configuration of velum-related obstruction or the degree of epiglottis-related obstruction. Surgical response was associated with tonsil size and body mass index (inversely). Conclusion DISE findings concerning the oropharyngeal lateral walls and tongue may be the most important findings of this evaluation technique. Level of evidence 2B Laryngoscope, 129:761-770, 2019.

Upper airway stimulation is a powerful tool in the sleep surgeon’s arsenal for dealing with obstructive sleep apnea. With long-term data now available on patient outcomes, there is a greater understanding of the complications, long-term effects, and stability of the improvement in clinical parameters. As a result, we have improved our ability to recognize difficulties with the device and improve results. This chapter covers both routine follow-up (frequency of visits, device checks, criteria for repeat sleep studies, monitoring of patient subjective and objective parameters, monitoring of adverse events, and long-term device maintenance) and complexities that can arise years out from the original surgery (suboptimal clinical response to upper airway stimulation, weight gain, comorbid medical conditions, surgical complications in the long-term setting, device malfunction, complex device programming, complex polysomnographic titration, awake vs. sleep endoscopy for titration, and complex clinical profiles).

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS To determine the association between findings of blinded reviews of preoperative drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) and outcomes of hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). STUDY DESIGN Cohort study. METHODS A retrospective, multicenter cohort study of 343 adults who underwent treatment of OSA with HNS from 10 academic medical centers was performed. Preoperative DISE videos were scored by four blinded reviewers using the VOTE Classification and evaluation of a possible primary structure contributing to airway obstruction. Consensus DISE findings were examined for an association with surgical outcomes based on therapy titration polysomnogram (tPSG). Treatment response was defined by a decrease of ≥50% in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) to

Successful palatopharyngoplasty is critical for successful sleep apnea surgery. Traditional uvulopalatopharyngoplasty was primarily excisional, whereas newer techniques, such as expansion sphincterpharyngoplasty, are more reconstructive. Studies of flow dynamics even demonstrate that the effectiveness of maxillofacial surgery is significantly mediated through stiffening and enlargement of the lateral retropalatal and pharyngeal airway. The current modified technique of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty/expansion sphincteroplasty aims to maximize relocation and tension on the palatopharyngeus muscle, opening the retropalatal airway and the palatal genu, and minimizing tension on the final mucosal closure.

Objective: To present 5-year outcomes from a prospective cohort of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who were treated with upper airway stimulation (UAS) via a unilateral hypoglossal nerve implant. Study Design: A multicenter prospective cohort study. Setting: Industry-supported multicenter academic and clinical trial. Methods: From a cohort of 126 patients, 97 completed protocol, and 71 consented to a voluntary polysomnogram. Those having continuous positive airway pressure failure with moderate to severe OSA, body mass index 2, and no unfavorable collapse on drug-induced sleep endoscopy were enrolled in a phase 3 trial. Prospective outcomes included apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), oxygen desaturation index, and adverse events, as well as measures of sleepiness, quality of life, and snoring. Results: Patients who did and did not complete the protocol differed in baseline AHI, oxygen desaturation index, and Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire scores but not in any other demographics or treatment response measures. Improvement in sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale) and quality of life was observed, with normalization of scores increasing from 33% to 78% and 15% to 67%, respectively. AHI response rate (AHI 50% reduction) was 75% (n = 71). When a last observation carried forward analysis was applied, the responder rate was 63% at 5 years. Serious device-related events all related to lead/device adjustments were reported in 6% of patients. Conclusions: Improvements in sleepiness, quality of life, and respiratory outcomes are observed with 5 years of UAS. Serious adverse events are uncommon. UAS is a nonanatomic surgical treatment with long-term benefit for individuals with moderate to severe OSA who have failed nasal continuous positive airway pressure.

Surgical techniques for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) constantly evolve. This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of a new surgical approach for an OSAS pharyngoplasty with a dorsal palatal flap expansion (PDPFEx). A total of 21 participants (mean age 49.9, mean BMI 32.5) underwent a type III sleep study, an endoscopy of the upper airways, a filled medical history, a visual analog scale for snoring loudness, an Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and a Short Form Health Survey-36 questionnaire. A follow-up re-evaluation was performed 11 ± 4.9 months post-operatively. The study group (4 with moderate, 17 with severe OSAS) showed an improvement in all measured sleep study characteristics (p &lt, 0.05), apnea-hypopnea index (pre-median 45.7 to 29.3 post-operatively, p = 0.009, r = 0.394), oxygen desaturation index (pre-median 47.7 and 23.3 post-operatively, p = 0.0005, r = 0.812), mean oxygen saturation (median 92% pre-operatively and median 94% post-operatively, p = 0.0002, r = 0.812), lowest oxygen saturation (p = 0.0001, r = 0.540) and time of sleep spent with blood oxygen saturation less than 90% (p = 0.0001, r = 0.485). The most commonly reported complications were throat dryness (11 patients) and minor difficulties in swallowing (5 patients transient, 3 patients constant). We conclude that a PDPFEx is a promising new surgical method, however, further controlled studies are needed to demonstrate its safety and efficacy for OSAS treatment in adults.

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA) is a multi-factorial disorder, with quite complex endotypes, consisting of anatomical and non-anatomical pathophysiological factors. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is recognized as the first-line standard treatment for OSA, whereas upper airway (UA) surgery is often recommended for treating OSA patients who have refused or cannot tolerate CPAP. The main results achievable by the surgery are UA expansion, and/or stabilization, and/or removal of the obstructive tissue to different UA levels. The site and pattern of UA collapse identification is of upmost importance in selecting the customized surgical procedure to perform, as well as the identification of the relation between anatomical and non-anatomical factors in each patient. Medical history, sleep studies, clinical examination, UA endoscopy in awake and drug-induced sedation, and imaging help the otorhinolaryngologist in selecting the surgical candidate, identifying OSA patients with mild UA collapsibility or tissue UA obstruction, which allow achievement of the best surgical outcomes. Literature data reported that the latest palatal surgical procedures, such as expansion sphincter palatoplasty or barbed reposition palatoplasty, which achieve soft palatal and lateral pharyngeal wall remodeling and stiffening, improved the Apnea Hypopnea Index, but the outcome analyses are still limited by methodological bias and the limited number of patients’ in each study. Otherwise, the latest literature data have also demonstrated the role of UA surgery in the improvement of non-anatomical factors, confirming that a multidisciplinary and multimodality diagnostic and therapeutical approach to OSA patients could allow the best selection of customized treatment options and outcomes.

Objective Selective upper airway stimulation is now well-established in the United States and in several European countries, with more than 1,000 patients implanted since U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval in April 2014. The authors herein, all head and neck surgeons, account for approximately one of every five implants completed to date. Several of the authors also provide comprehensive longitudinal care of their patients as dual-specialty sleep medicine physicians. Study Design Multi-center, retrospective clinical analysis. Methods More than 300 implants have been evaluated and reviewed in five different implant centers (Germany, United States). Results This analysis shares tips and techniques from the collective experiences with more than 300 implants, which can help newer implanters learn vicariously both for standard practices in executing routine implants through activation and, importantly, for working through more challenging encounters with anatomy, special patient phenotypes, system testing, and troubleshooting. Conclusion These tips should help new implanters handle most of the situations arising during implantation and avoid common pitfalls. Laryngoscope, 2017

Objective: To assess patient-based outcomes of participants in a large cohort study—the STAR trial (Stimulation Therapy for Apnea Reduction)—48 months after implantation with an upper airway stimulation system for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea.Study Design: A multicenter prospective cohort study. Setting: Industry-supported multicenter academic and clinical setting. Subjects: Participants (n = 91) at 48 months from a cohort of 126 implanted participants. Methods: A total of 126 participants received an implanted upper airway stimulation system in a prospective phase III trial. Patient-reported outcomes at 48 months, including Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ), and snoring level, were compared with preimplantation baseline.Results: A total of 91 subjects completed the 48-month visit. Daytime sleepiness as measured by ESS was significantly reduced (P =.01), and sleep-related quality of life as measured by FOSQ significantly improved (P =.01) when compared with baseline. Soft to no snoring was reported by 85% of bed partners. Two patients required additional surgery without complication for lead malfunction. Conclusion: Upper airway stimulation maintained a sustained benefit on patient-reported outcomes (ESS, FOSQ, snoring) at 48 months in select patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea.

Citation: Garcia GJM, Woodson BT. The collapsing anatomical structure is not always the primary site of flow limitation in obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2020;16(3):345–346.

The classical Starling Resistor model has been the paradigm of airway collapse in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) for the last 30 years. Its theoretical framework is grounded on the wave-speed flow limitation (WSFL) theory. Recent observations of negative effort dependence in OSA patients violate the predictions of the WSFL theory. Fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulations are emerging as a technique to quantify how the biomechanical properties of the upper airway determine the shape of the pressure-flow curve. This study aimed to test two predictions of the WSFL theory, namely (1) the pressure profile upstream from the choke point becomes independent of downstream pressure during flow limitation and (2) the maximum flowrate in a collapsible tube is V I max = A 3 / 2 ( ρ d A / d P ) - 1 / 2 , where ρ is air density and A and P are the cross-sectional area and pressure at the choke point respectively. FSI simulations were performed in a model of the human upper airway with a collapsible pharynx whose wall thickness varied from 2 to 8 mm and modulus of elasticity ranged from 2 to 30 kPa. Experimental measurements in an airway replica with a silicone pharynx validated the numerical methods. Good agreement was found between our FSI simulations and the WSFL theory. Other key findings include: (1) the pressure-flow curve is independent of breathing effort (downstream pressure vs. time profile); (2) the shape of the pressure-flow curve reflects the airway biomechanical properties, so that V I max is a surrogate measure of pharyngeal compliance.

A variety of sleep disturbances and disorders can be exhibited by mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients, both as acute and chronic sequelae post-injury, and can differ in presentation from those of more severe TBI patients. These disorders require proper recognition and diagnosis by practitioners. While study of mTBI-related sleep disorders has increased in recent years, much remains to be understood concerning the prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment of these disorders among different populations. Particularly, important areas for further study include the long-term effects of mTBI on sleep, pharmacologic treatment of mTBI-related sleep disorders, the pathophysiology of sleep disruption in mTBI and the interplay of sleep disorders and chronic pain and psychiatric disorders among mTBI patients.

Objective To evaluate the association between findings of blinded reviews of preoperative drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) examinations using the VOTE Classification and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) surgical outcomes in a large multicenter, international cohort. Methods Retrospective, multi-center cohort study of adults without tonsillar hypertrophy who underwent pharyngeal surgery for OSA. The study included only participants without enlarged tonsils. Four independent reviewers performed blinded review of preoperative DISE videos using the VOTE Classification system and scoring of a primary structure contributing to airway obstruction. DISE findings were examined for an association with surgical outcomes with univariate analyses and multiple regression. Results Two hundred seventy-five study participants were included from 14 centers. Mean age was 51.4 +/- 11.8 years, and body mass index was 30.1 +/- 5.2 kg/m(2). There was moderate interrater reliability (kappa = 0.40-0.60) for DISE findings. Oropharyngeal lateral wall-related obstruction was associated with poorer surgical outcomes (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.51; 95% CI 0.27, 0.93). Complete tongue-related obstruction was associated with a lower odds of surgical response in moderate to severe OSA (AOR 0.52; 95% CI 0.28, 0.98), with findings that were similar but not statistically significant in other analyses. Surgical outcomes were not clearly associated with the degree and configuration of velum-related obstruction or the degree of epiglottis-related obstruction. Surgical response was associated with tonsil size and body mass index (inversely). Conclusion DISE findings concerning the oropharyngeal lateral walls and tongue may be the most important findings of this evaluation tec

Selective upper airway stimulation has been established as an additional treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Essential for the treatment is the precise placement of the cuff electrode for select branches of the hypoglossal nerve, which innervate the protrusors and stiffeners of the tongue. A direct approach to the distal hypoglossal nerve has been established to achieve this goal. For surgeons, detailed knowledge of this anatomy is vital. Another decisive step is the placement of the sensing lead between the intercostal muscles. Also, the complexity of follow-up care postoperatively should be kept in mind. The aim of this article is to provide the latest knowledge on the neuroanatomy of the hypoglossal nerve and to give surgeons a step-by-step guide on the current operative technique. Laryngoscope, 126:S12-S16, 2016.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between findings of blinded reviews of preoperative drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) examinations using the VOTE Classification and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) surgical outcomes in a large multicenter, international cohort. METHODS: Retrospective, multi-center cohort study of adults without tonsillar hypertrophy who underwent pharyngeal surgery for OSA. The study included only participants without enlarged tonsils. Four independent reviewers performed blinded review of preoperative DISE videos using the VOTE Classification system and scoring of a primary structure contributing to airway obstruction. DISE findings were examined for an association with surgical outcomes with univariate analyses and multiple regression. RESULTS: 275 study participants were included from 14 centers. Mean age was 51.4±11.8 years, and body mass index was 30.1 ± 5.2 kg/m(2). There was moderate inter-rater reliability (kappa = 0.40-0.60) for DISE findings. Oropharyngeal lateral wall-related obstruction was associated with poorer surgical outcomes (adjusted odds ratio 0.51; 95% CI 0.27, 0.93). Complete tongue-related obstruction was associated with a lower odds of surgical response in moderate to severe OSA (adjusted odds ratio 0.52; 95% CI 0.28, 0.98), with findings that were similar but not statistically-significant in other analyses. Surgical outcomes were not clearly associated with the degree and configuration of velum-related obstruction or the degree of epiglottis-related obstruction. Surgical response was associated with tonsil size and body mass index (inversely). CONCLUSION: DISE findings concerning the oropharyngeal lateral walls and tongue may be the most important findings of this evaluation technique.

The goal of this review is to advance the understanding of the muscular and soft tissue palatal anatomy as it relates to palatal surgery for sleep apnea and the phenotypic variations that generate the shape and collapsibility of the retropalatal airway. Anatomically, the soft palate has both a proximal and distal segments separated by the palatal genu. The proximal palatal segment has a variable angle from the hard palate (ie, alpha angle) determined by the position and length of the levator veli palatini muscle. The palatopharyngeus muscle (PP) is a major defining element of the palate and lateral pharyngeal wall and forms the medial wall of the lateral palatal space. It is composed of two divisions: the longitudinal palatopharyngeus fasciculi which acts to elevate the pharynx and depress the soft palate and the transverse palatopharyngeus fascicle (Passavant's ridge) which function is a nasopharyngeal sphincter. The lateral palatal space incorporates the supra‐tonsilar fat, and is bounded by muscles that determine the structure of the palate and associated lateral pharyngeal walls. Understanding of palatal muscles and pharyngeal airway phenotypes provides insight into the steps and mechanisms of pharyngoplasty procedures. Level of Evidence N/A

This study seeks to determine the success rates of the expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty and its variants on the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Systematic review and meta-analysis. Two independent searches of MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library and Evidence Based Medicine Reviews to identify publications relevant to OSA and expansion pharyngoplasty. All relevant studies published before 31 March 2015 were included. Five studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The numbers of patients in each paper ranged from 10 to 85 (total = 155), and mean age ranged from 8 to 56 years. Substantial and consistent improvement in PSG outcomes were observed post-expansion pharyngoplasty patients, with or without multilevel surgery groups. The results showed that the expansion pharyngoplasty technique has significantly lower AHI than control group [Standardised mean difference -7.32, 95 %CI (-11.11, -3.52), p = 0.0002]; however, substantial heterogeneity between these studies were observed. The mean pre-operative AHI (in the five papers) improved from 40.0 ± 12.6 to 8.3 ± 5.2 post-operatively. The overall pro-rated pooled success rate for all the patients was 86.3 %. The expansion pharyngoplasty is effective in the management of patients with OSA.

Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) has been the most commonly performed procedure for obstructive sleep apnea. However, high failure rates of this procedure, which can reach 50%-70% of the cases, have led to various modifications in the UPPP technique to address persistent obstruction after traditional UPPP surgery. Expansion sphincteroplasty was developed as a modification of UPPP to address lateral wall collapse proximal to the free margin of the palate and transpalatal advancement pharyngoplasty was developed as a modification of UPPP to address more proximal anterior posterior narrowing of the retropalatal segment. Transpalatal advancement has also been shown to address proximal lateral wall airway narrowing.

Objective: Pilot study to examine the effect of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the lateral palatal fat pad in patients with socially-disruptive snoring. Method: Snoring outcomes and complications were compared between a group of patients with treated with RFA ablation of the lateral soft palate fat pad with or without inferior turbinate reduction (8 patients) and another group undergoing inferior turbinate reduction alone (12 patients). Results: Snoring loudness and bothersomeness improved in the palate but not inferior turbinate group. Pain was mild and no major complications were observed. Conclusion: The study supports RFA ablation of the lateral palatal space as a potential low morbidity procedure for snoring. Keywords: Snoring, Radiofrequency, Somnoplasty, Radiofrequency ablation, Inferior turbinate reduction, Turbinoplasty

Selective upper airway stimulation is now well-established in the United States and in several European countries, with more than 1,000 patients implanted since U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval in April 2014. The authors herein, all head and neck surgeons, account for approximately one of every five implants completed to date. Several of the authors also provide comprehensive longitudinal care of their patients as dual-specialty sleep medicine physicians.Multi-center, retrospective clinical analysis.More than 300 implants have been evaluated and reviewed in five different implant centers (Germany, United States).This analysis shares tips and techniques from the collective experiences with more than 300 implants, which can help newer implanters learn vicariously both for standard practices in executing routine implants through activation and, importantly, for working through more challenging encounters with anatomy, special patient phenotypes, system testing, and troubleshooting.These tips should help new implanters handle most of the situations arising during implantation and avoid common pitfalls. Laryngoscope, 128:756-762, 2018.

The failure of traditional upper airway surgery such as uvulopalatopharyngoplasty has been attributed to lower airway obstruction related to base of tongue collapse. Multiple procedures, including glossectomy, tongue base radiofrequency, genioglossus advancement, and tongue suspension techniques, have been advocated to improve success rates. No consensus exists on which subsets of patients are best treated by individual approaches and direct comparative data are lacking. The selection of procedures must be based on individual patient needs and the relative potential benefits and risks.

Objectives/Hypothesis To describe and to assess reproducibility of a method to model the lumen of the pharyngeal airway using anatomic structures. Study Design Single-center, institutional review board-approved retrospective case series. Methods Multiple structural landmarks (hard palate, palatal aponeurosis, genu, velum, and lateral wall; pharyngeal and vallecular tongue base; and epiglottis) were used as reference points to score the associated airway. These characteristics were then combined to create a luminal model of the pharyngeal airway. Retrospective assessment by two independent observers of 117 sedated endoscopies from a convenience sample (81% male, aged 51.4 years; apnea hypopnea index 38.5 events/hr) was performed. Results Scoring of individual landmarks demonstrated a good or better agreement (kappa of 0.42–0.79). Agreement on whether the airway was constricted/obstructed was very high (kappa > 0.77). Based on differences in airway measures at different levels, multiple patterns of luminal shape and narrowing were observed. The upper pharyngeal lumen was classified into different shapes based on findings at different levels of the soft palate (oblique, 52%; intermediate, 23%; vertical, 25%). Similarly, the lower pharynx was classified into three shapes based on the structure of the tongue. Conclusion Multiple pharyngeal luminal configurations describing airway phenotypes can be described using landmarks identifiable on endoscopy. Level of Evidence 4. Laryngoscope, 125:1233–1238, 2015

Economic and access issues are driving the use of portable monitoring for primary diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in selected adults. Its applicability has been demonstrated for adults at high risk of sleep apnea, but many caveats and research questions remain. For technical reasons, most limited-channel diagnostic devices tend to underestimate the severity of the disease. In addition, portable monitoring is of little value for sleep disorders other than OSA and has not been advocated for children or the elderly. Similarly, auto-continuous positive airway pressure (APAP) is an alternative to in-laboratory continuous PAP titration. The cost-effectiveness of portable diagnostic testing and APAP titration in actual practice is yet to be determined, but will be a critical question in the years ahead. Future research should examine their use for extended populations, and the economic effect of these modalities, to determine the best use of these techniques as alternatives to traditional in-laboratory testing.

Traditional upper airway surgery directly modifies skeletal and soft tissue structures surrounding the airway to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Upper airway stimulation (UAS) attempts to treat upper airway obstruction and OSA by stimulating the hypoglossal nerve. The Inspire II implant has been approved for clinical UAS. Basic science data support that UAS prevents obstruction and improves airflow. Clinical results demonstrate that UAS improves respiratory sleep metrics and improves both objective and subjective self-reported sleep and quality-of-life outcomes. In a substantial number of individuals who meet inclusion criteria, UAS appears to be a viable, long-term, low-morbidity treatment of moderate-to-severe OSA.

This study aimed to assess if metformin had any associations with the prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea in an adult type 2 diabetes population in the Midwest.Use of metformin is associated with decreased prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea in a adult type 2 diabetes population.A retrospective secondary database analysis was carried out with metformin use by patients with type 2 diabetes as the primary variable of interest and obstructive sleep apnea status as the primary outcome. A sample population of 9,853 type 2 diabetes patients with one year of follow-up was used. Other variables that were analyzed included age, gender, race, hypertension, Congestive Heart Failure, Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and Body Mass Index. A p-value of0.01 was considered significant.Metformin usage was not significantly associated with obstructive sleep apnea prevalence (Odds Ratio: 1.17, Confidence Interval: 1.00-1.36, p = 0.049), but trended in the direction where metformin usage was associated with having obstructive sleep apnea. Lower HbA1c was found to be significantly associated with lower prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (p0.001). The rest of the variables followed previously published associations.Metformin therapy may improve sleep quality, but it may not be through methods that reduce the likelihood of developing obstructive sleep apnea. Future studies that can prove causation about this association should be considered.