Search

Abstract: Introduction: The PINPOINT® Endoscopic Fluorescence Imaging System (Novadaq, Mississauga, Canada) allows surgeons to visualize the bile ducts during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgeons can continue operation while confirming the bile ducts’ fluorescence with a bright‐field/color image. However, strong fluorescence of the liver can interfere with the surgery. Here, we investigated the optimal timing of indocyanine green administration to allow fluorescent cholangiography to be performed without interference from the liver fluorescence. Methods: A total of 72 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in this study. The timing of indocyanine green administration was set immediately before surgery and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 24 h before surgery. The luminance intensity ratios of gallbladder/liver, cystic duct/liver, and common bile duct/liver were measured using the ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA). Visibility of the gallbladder and bile ducts was classified into three categories (grades A, B, and C) based on the degree of visibility in contrast to the liver. Results: The luminance intensity ratio for the gallbladder/liver, cystic duct/liver, and common bile duct/liver was ≥1 in the 15‐, 18‐, and 24‐h groups. The proportion of cases in which evaluators classified the visibility of the gallbladder and bile ducts as grade A (best visibility) reached a peak in the 15‐h group and decreased thereafter. Conclusions: In the present study, the optimal timing of indocyanine green administration for fluorescent cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the PINPOINT Endoscopic Fluorescence Imaging System was 15 h before surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The management of gastric cancer causing gastric outlet obstruction and dilatation must include decompression of the stomach and intravenous nutrition. Percutaneous transesophageal gastrotubing (PTEG) is an effective technique for either gastric decompression or enteral nutrition. Here, we investigated the efficacy and safety of double PTEG (dPTEG), that is, using PTEG for both purposes simultaneously, in patients with gastric cancer. Materials and methods Eleven patients with gastric outlet obstruction due to gastric cancer were admitted to our hospital between January 2015 and March 2017 and enrolled in this study. Each patient underwent dPTEG as soon as possible. After dPTEG tubes were placed, gastric decompression was started immediately and enteral nutrition was started within 1 d. Feeding and decompression through the double tubes were continued until the day before operation. Using data from these patients, we investigated the efficacy and safety of dPTEG. Results dPTEG was performed successfully in all patients and no critical adverse effects were observed. Eight of the 11 patients underwent radical or palliative resection. Decompression of the stomach was achieved and nutritional status was significantly improved after dPTEG in all patients. Conclusions We conclude that dPTEG is a safe and effective management technique for patients with gastric outlet obstruction and gastric dilatation due to gastric cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common complication of gastrointestinal surgery. Because retention suture is known to prevent abdominal wound dehiscence, it is only considered indicated in high-risk patients. At present, there are no clear indications for retention suture. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of prophylactic retention suture and to determine what situations indicate prophylactic retention suture against SSI. Material and methods Between January 2014 and January 2016, 135 patients who underwent midline laparotomy in our hospital were analyzed. Inclusion criteria for this study were patients with American Society Anesthesiologists' physical status classification system (ASA-PS score) ≥ 3 or emergent surgery. Results Of the 135 patients, 30 (22.2%) received prophylactic retention suture. Diabetes mellitus, surgical wound classification, large incision, and retention suture were associated with SSI in multivariate analysis. In subgroup analysis, SSI risk factors were analyzed in each surgical wound classification. Only in surgical wound classification class II and III did retention suture significantly reduce the risk of SSI (odds ratio = 0.100 [0.012-0.837], P = 0.034). In class IV, however, half the patients developed SSI, regardless of retention suture. Table 3 summarizes the results of the subgroup analysis. Conclusions The present data suggest that prophylactic retention suture reduces SSI for surgical wound classification class II or III. For class IV operations, however, other methods to prevent SSI are necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence for intestinal blood flow has been reported, but application during laparoscopic surgery for incarcerated inguinal hernia has not been reported. Here, we report the case of a patient with an incarcerated inguinal hernia in whom the bowel was preserved after evaluation of intestinal blood flow with ICG fluorescence using PINPOINT®, a brightfield full-color, near-infrared fluorescence camera. A man in his 80s was diagnosed with incarcerated inguinal hernia and underwent laparoscopic surgery. The ascending colon and mesentery showed deep red discoloration on gross evaluation. However, intravenous injection of ICG revealed uniform fluorescence of the mesentery and bowel wall, indicating the absence of irreversible ischemic changes of the bowel. As such, no resection was performed, and transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty was completed. The patient had a good postoperative course. In this case, ICG fluorescence with the PINPOINT was useful to avoid bowel resection during laparoscopic surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although postoperative esophageal hiatal hernia (EHH) is primarily considered a post-operative complication of esophagectomy, it is also a rare post-operative complication of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG), with a reported incidence rate of 0.5 %. The purpose of this study is to analyze the incidence, clinical features, and prevention of EHH following LTG for gastric cancer.Methods: Between October 2008 and July 2014, 78 patients who underwent LTG for gastric cancer in our hospital were analyzed. We compared the crus incision group (in which the left crus of the diaphragm was incised without suture repair) with the crus conserving or repair group (in which the crus was preserved or the crus was incised and underwent suture repair). The primary endpoint was incidence of postoperative EHH.Results: Of the 78 patients, 7 (9.0 %) developed postoperative EHH. Three of seven patients (42.9 %) were symptomatic and required an emergency operation for intestinal obstruction. Four of seven patients (57.1 %) were asymptomatic and did not require an operation. Incising the left crus of the diaphragm without suture repair during LTG was considered the only risk factor for postoperative EHH (0 of 29 for preserving the crus or incising and performing suture repair of the crus vs. 7 of 49 in crus incision without suture repair; p = 0.033).Conclusions: The present data suggest that incision of the crus without suture repair is associated with EHH after LTG. If crus incision is required, crus repair may be effective for the prevention of postoperative EHH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Recent interest in improving cosmetic outcomes has led to single-incision laparoscopic surgery ( SILS) being performed in a variety of organs. However, this innovative technique has rarely been introduced in pancreatic surgery, as it is considered to be a challenging procedure. We report herein our technique of single-incision laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with or without splenic preservation. Materials and Surgical Technique A 2.5-cm intraumbilical mini-laparotomy was made for the placement of a SILS Port as a single access site. The overall procedures were similar to those performed in the standard laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with multiple trocars. To obtain better exposure of the operative field, we made technical refinements by employing gastric suspension with sutures, the tug-exposure technique, a balloon retractor, and gravity by changing the patient's position. The pancreas was transected with a linear stapler, and the specimen was extracted through the umbilical wound. Discussion Patients were discharged without any complications. The umbilical wounds were almost invisible 1 month after surgery. We believe that SILS, with some technical refinements, can be safely applied for distal pancreatectomy. Although the cosmetic benefits of single-incision laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy are obvious, several issues such as the extent of invasiveness, cost, indications, and learning curve need to be investigated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report a patient who underwent laparoscopic enucleation for a nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. The patient was a 55-year-old man who had a 12- × 11-mm tumor close to the main pancreatic duct ( MPD) in the pancreatic body. To avoid and detect injury to the main pancreatic duct during operation, a nasopancreatic drainage stent ( NPDS) was endoscopically placed prior to the operation. According to the NPDS, the relation between the tumor and MPD was easily identified by laparoscopic ultrasonography during enucleation, thus enabling the resecting line to be determined. Moreover, after enucleation, pancreatography through the NPDS was able to clarify the absence of injury to the MPD. The NPDS was removed postoperatively, and the patient was discharged uneventfully on postoperative day 8. Preoperative placement of the NPDS seems to be a useful option for performing safe laparoscopic enucleation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, especially when the lesion is located close to the MPD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]