Search

Aim: Autoimmune nodopathies have specific clinicopathologic features, antibodies directed against nodal proteins (neurofascin 186) or paranodal proteins (neurofascin 155, contactin 1, contactin‐associated protein 1 (Caspr1)), and usually have a poor response to first‐line therapies for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Anti‐Caspr1 nodopathy treated with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) has not been previously reported. Methods: We report the first case of an anti‐Caspr1 antibody‐positive nodopathy refractory to high‐intensity immunosuppressive treatment, including rituximab, that responded dramatically to AHSCT. Results: A 53‐year‐old woman presented with a rapidly progressive generalized ataxic, painful motor, and inflammatory neuropathy supported by neurophysiologic and MRI studies. Initial tests for antibodies to nodal/paranodal proteins were negative. She was treated with multiple courses of intravenous immunoglobulin and methylprednisolone, plasma exchange, rituximab, and cyclophosphamide without significant clinical benefit. Repeated testing for antibodies to nodal/paranodal proteins yielded a positive result for anti‐Caspr1/IgG4 isotype antibodies. Given the poor response to multiple high intensity treatments and the relatively young age of the patient, we decided to perform AHSCT at 30 months post‐onset. Immediately after AHSCT, she stopped all immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapy. The Overall Neuropathy Limitation Score improved from 8/12 to 4/12 at 6 months post‐AHSCT. At 3 months post‐AHSCT, IgG4 against Caspr1 was negative and no reactivity against paranodes could be detected. Conclusion: We report a particularly severe anti‐Caspr1 antibody autoimmune nodopathy that responded dramatically to AHSCT. Although the rarity of the disease limits the possibility of larger studies, AHSCT may be a valuable therapy in treatment‐refractory cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Acute hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection has recently emerged as a potential trigger for acute dysimmune neuropathies, but prospective controlled studies are lacking. Aims: To compare the frequency of concomitant acute HEV infection in patients with neuralgic amyotrophy (NA), Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS), and Bell's palsy with a matched control population. Methods: Swiss multicenter, prospective, observational, matched case–control study over 3 years (September 2019–October 2022). Neurological cases with NA, GBS, or Bell's palsy were recruited within 1 month of disease onset. Healthy controls were matched for age, sex, geographical location, and timing of blood collection. Diagnostic criteria for acute hepatitis E were reactive serum anti‐HEV IgM and IgG assays (ELISA test) and/or HEV RNA detection in serum by real‐time polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR). RT‐PCR was performed on sera to confirm IgM positivity. Results: We included 180 patients (59 GBS, 51 NA, 70 Bell's palsy cases) and corresponding matched controls (blood donors) with median age 51 years for both groups and equal gender distribution. Six IgM+ cases were detected in the NA, two in the GBS, and none in the Bell's palsy group. Two controls were anti‐HEV IgM‐positive. At disease onset, most cases with acute HEV infection had increased liver enzymes. A moderate association (p = 0.027, Fisher's exact test; Cramér's V = −0.25) was observed only between acute HEV infection and NA. Conclusion: This prospective observational study suggests an association between concomitant acute HEV infection and NA, but not with GBS or Bell's palsy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose Methods Results Conclusions Infections and vaccinations have been identified as potential immunological triggers of neuralgic amyotrophy (NA), but the exact type and frequency of the preceding agents is unknown.This was a multicentre, prospective, observational, matched case–control study. NA was diagnosed by neuromuscular experts according to validated clinical criteria and electrodiagnostic studies. Clinical data and biological samples of NA patients were collected within 90 days from disease onset between June 2018 and December 2023. All NA patients were asked about prior infection and vaccination in the month before disease onset. Serological tests for hepatitis E virus, human immunodeficiency virus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, Epstein–Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, parvovirus B19, varicella‐zoster virus, Borrelia burgdorferi, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Bartonella henselae were performed in a central laboratory. Each case was matched with a healthy control for age, sex, place of residence and time of blood collection.Fifty‐seven patients and corresponding controls were included. The mean age was 45 years for both groups. NA onset was preceded by a symptomatic infectious trigger confirmed by microbiological tests in 15/57 (26.3%) patients. Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination was considered a potential trigger in 7/57 (12.3%) subjects. An acute viral infection was associated with a bilateral involvement of the brachial plexus (p = 0.003, Cramèr's V = 0.43).Confirmed immune triggers (infection or vaccination) preceded disease onset in 22/57 (38.6%) NA cases. We suggest to test NA patients in the acute phase for intracellular antigens, especially in the case of concomitant bilateral involvement and hepatitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the wake of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, an increasing number of patients with neurological disorders, including Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), have been reported following this infection. It remains unclear, however, if these cases are coincidental or not, as most publications were case reports or small regional retrospective cohort studies. The International GBS Outcome Study is an ongoing prospective observational cohort study enrolling patients with GBS within 2 weeks from onset of weakness. Data from patients included in this study, between 30 January 2020 and 30 May 2020, were used to investigate clinical and laboratory signs of a preceding or concurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection and to describe the associated clinical phenotype and disease course. Patients were classified according to the SARS-CoV-2 case definitions of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control and laboratory recommendations of the World Health Organization. Forty-nine patients with GBS were included, of whom eight (16%) had a confirmed and three (6%) a probable SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nine of these 11 patients had no serological evidence of other recent preceding infections associated with GBS, whereas two had serological evidence of a recent Campylobacter jejuni infection. Patients with a confirmed or probable SARS-CoV-2 infection frequently had a sensorimotor variant 8/11 (73%) and facial palsy 7/11 (64%). The eight patients who underwent electrophysiological examination all had a demyelinating subtype, which was more prevalent than the other patients included in the same time window [14/30 (47%), P = 0.012] as well as historical region and age-matched control subjects included in the International GBS Outcome Study before the pandemic [23/44 (52%), P = 0.016]. The median time from the onset of infection to neurological symptoms was 16 days (interquartile range 12-22). Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection shared uniform neurological features, similar to those previously described in other post-viral GBS patients. The frequency (22%) of a preceding SARS-CoV-2 infection in our study population was higher than estimates of the contemporaneous background prevalence of SARS-CoV-2, which may be a result of recruitment bias during the pandemic, but could also indicate that GBS may rarely follow a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection. Consistent with previous studies, we found no increase in patient recruitment during the pandemic for our ongoing International GBS Outcome Study compared to previous years, making a strong relationship of GBS with SARS-CoV-2 unlikely. A case-control study is required to determine if there is a causative link or not., (© The Author(s) (2021). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.)

Musculoskeletal disorders are a crossroad among diverse specialties: neurology, rehabilitation, orthopedics, occupational medicine and psycho-traumatology. They are integrated into occupational medicine and encompass overuse syndromes, repeated micro-trauma and focal compressive neuropathies linked with professional or sports' activity. Neurological manifestations are omnipresent. Yet, their importance is not always recognized despite frequent resort to neurologists specialized in peripheral nervous system disorders and neurophysiology, as well as, to behavioral cognition specialists. Therapeutic approaches require preventive and work organization measures, neurophysiologic investigations and imaging in expert hands, and conservative treatment with physiotherapy, with or without paraneural and intra-articular injections.