Search

In the absence of a comprehensive pre-Oligocene fossil record, the origin and early evolution of hystricognathous rodents have long been the subject of much uncertainty. Baluchimyinae (Rodentia) were initially interpreted as a subfamily of the ctenodactyloid Chappatimyidae (sciurognathous), a group considered to be endemic to the Indian subcontinent and to be closely related to hystricognathous rodents. A newly discovered early Oligocene hystricognathous rodent, Bugtimys zafarullahi gen. n. et sp. n., described herein, from the Bugti Hills (Balochistan, Pakistan) sheds new light on the higher level taxonomy of the previously described Baluchimyinae. As a contribution to the phylogenetic debates regarding the origin of Hystricognathi, we present a cladistic assessment of the dental evidence for the Palaeogene hystricognathous rodent cladogenesis. Our phylogenetic results consistently support the monophyly of the Hystricognathiformes clade (including Tsaganomyidae plus Hystricognathi) of which baluchimyine rodents are clearly members. There is, however, no support for the monophyly of a baluchimyine clade. Nonetheless, ‘baluchimyines’ are for the moment reinterpreted as Hystricognathi incertae sedis. Hystricognathous rodents appear to be well diversified at least since the early Oligocene, both in Africa and South America (phiomorphs and caviomorphs, respectively), and also now in south Asia. Furthermore, our phylogenetic results support close relationships between early hystricognathous and Asian ‘ctenodactyloid’ rodents, which clearly points to an Asian origin for Hystricognathi. In this phylogenetic framework, ‘baluchimyines’ and tsaganomyids are representatives of an initial phase of diversification of hystricognathous rodents in Asia. Oligocene phiomorphs and caviomorphs (sister groups) seem therefore to share a common ‘Asian’ hystricognathous ancestor. This reinforces the possibility that the early dispersal of hystricognathous rodents to South America was not from Africa but from Asia.

The taxa within the family Tsaganomyidae are systematically redefined. Cyclomylus lohensis is a valid taxon. It is generically different from Tsaganomys in both tooth and skull morphology, including having lower crowned cheek teeth with closed roots, more prominent lophs and cusps on occlusal surfaces, a reduced dentine part, different microstructure of the incisor enamel, as well as other features. Two new species, C. intermedius and C. biforatus, are included in the genus Cyclomylus, mainly based on differences in crown height and root number. The strongly hypsodont tsaganomyids can be separated into two genera: Tsaganomys and a new genus, Coelodontomys, based on differences in cheek tooth morphology and relations of cheek teeth with incisors. As a result, Tsaganomyidae includes three genera and five species: Tsaganomys altaicus, Cyclomylus lohensis, C. intermedius, C. biforatus and Coelodontomys asiaticus. Tsaganomys is the sister group to Cyclomylus plus Coelodontomys. Cyclomylus lohensis, th...

Major crown-groups of rodents were well established in the early Tertiary, and fossils provide an invaluable window into their evolutionary history. The main focus of this project was to perform a cladistic assessment of the dental evidence for early Tertiary rodent cladogenesis – the masticatory apparatus and teeth are the most frequently preserved anatomical features in the fossil record. We focused on groups that existed in a period corresponding to their early history, combining fossils belonging to extinct lineages and to stem-groups leading to modern lineages. While the monophyly of some groups is not systematically explored, our results have important implications for high-level rodent relationships and systematics. These results are consistent with those of recent molecular phylogenies and reliably congruent with the stratigraphic record, thus enhancing the pertinence of dental characters for phylogenetic inference. Our approach provides evidence of a fundamental dichotomy in early rodent history. Two major clades have been identified: (1) the earliest ‘ctenodactyloid’ (Ctenodactylidae, Chapattimyidae, Yuomyidae, Diatomyidae) and hystricognathous (Tsaganomyidae, Baluchimyinae, ‘phiomorphs’, ‘caviomorphs’) rodents, and (2) the earliest ‘ischyromyoid’ rodents with their closest relatives (Muroidea + Dipodoidea + Geomyoidea + Anomaluroidea + Castoroidea + Sciuravidae + Gliroidea, and Sciuroidea + Aplodontoidea + Theridomorpha). This topology has led us to endorse Ctenohystrica as the first clade and propose a new taxon, Ischyromyiformes, for the second. Although minimized in our working hypothesis, the homoplasy in dental characters remains significant. However, a number of homoplasic characters reveal structuring in their internal distribution, allowing us to discern evolutionary morphological patterns, notably the pentalophodonty of molars, zygomasseteric complex and incisor enamel microstructure. © 2004 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 142, 105–134.