Introduction: Testing for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) as a biomarker in relation to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) treatment in ovarian cancer is done by sequencing of the BRCA1/2 genes and/or by assessing a genomic instability signature. Here we present data obtained with two different methods for genomic instability testing: the Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay Plus (OCA Plus) NGS panel and the OncoScan CNV assay., Methods: The retrospective analytical study included 80 ovarian cancer samples of patients previously referred to clinical Myriad testing (reference cohort), and 50 ovarian cancer samples from patients collected as part of the Pelvic Mass study. OCA Plus NGS libraries were sequenced with the Ion S5™XL Sequencer and analyzed with the Ion Reporter™ Software v5.20 for calculation of the genomic instability metric (GIM). In addition, all samples were tested with the OncoScan CNV FFPE Assay and analyzed with a previously published R-algorithm for generation of an in-house genomic instability score (in-house GIS)., Results: The OCA Plus assay had a concordance to the reference of 89% on samples with a tumor fraction ≥ 30% (auto-calculated or via molecular estimation). A total of 15 samples in the reference cohort had a calculated tumor fraction < 30% in the OCA Plus assay. In these, the concordance to reference was only 60%. For the OncoScan CNV in-house GIS a local cutoff point of ≥ 50 was calculated. This gave a concordance to the reference of 85%, with 91% of the samples in the reference cohort passing quality control (QC) on tumor fraction. Both assays had a high sensitivity for the detection of genomic instability in samples with pathogenic or likely pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations, with 12/13 being GIM positive (OCA Plus assay) and 13/13 being in-house GIS positive (OncoScan CNV assay)., Conclusions: The OCA Plus assay and the OncoScan CNV assay show a high but not complete concordance to reference standard homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) detection. The main reason for QC failure or non-concordance in our study was a low tumor fraction estimated in the assay, despite the selection of material by a pathologist with an inclusion criterion of > 30% tumor. QC steps should include careful tumor content evaluation, and results on samples with < 30% tumor should not be reported., Competing Interests: Declarations. Funding: Open access funding provided by Copenhagen University. Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests (include appropriate disclosures): L.S., T.S.P., L.K.V., I.J.C., E.H.: None. Ethics Approval: This retrospective study was conducted on already available data or biological material and approved by The Danish National Committee on Health Research Ethics (Case ID 2212528) and the Danish Capital Region Knowledge Center for Data Reviews (Case ID P-2023-13). Consent for Publication/Participation: Not applicable. Availability of Data and Material (Data Transparency): The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available, which is in accordance with the rules concerning the processing of personal data set out in the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Danish Data Protection Act. Nonetheless, may a researcher have an interest in our data, they are welcome to contact us for collaborations. The data that support the findings of this study can be requested from The National Secretariat for Bio- and Genome Bank Denmark, RBGB.sekretariat.herlev-og-gentofte-hospital@regionh.dk, Herlev Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 73, 2730 Herlev, Denmark. Author Contributions: Estrid Høgdall, Lone Schejbel, and Tim Svenstrup Poulsen contributed to the study conception and design. Next generation sequencing and data collection and analysis were performed by Lone Schejbel and Lau Kræsing Vestergaard. Statistical analyses were performed by Ib Jarle Christensen. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Lone Schejbel and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Code Availability (Software Application or Custom Code): Not applicable., (© 2024. The Author(s).)