Search

Summary Background. Interleukin (IL)-18 is a pleiotropic cytokine. Synergistically with IL-12, IL-18 promotes immune responses of the T helper type, by enhancing synthesis of interferon-γ and inhibiting IgE production. IL-18 can also enhance production of IL-4 and IL-13 production, and stimulate synthesis of IgE. Moreover, in the presence of IL-3, IL-18 can directly stimulate basophils and mast cells to produce their mediators in an IgE-independent manner. These results indicate a role for IL-18 in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis (AD). Aim. To examine the association of serum IL-18 with IgE levels and disease severity in patients with AD. Methods. ELISA was used to measure IL-18 and total IgE levels in the sera of 67 patients with AD and 50 healthy volunteers. The SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) tool was used to determine the severity of this disease. Results. The mean serum level of IL-18 in study group (155.68 pg/mL) was significantly higher than that of controls. IL-18 was also significantly higher in the sera of the patients with severe AD than in those with milder disease. There was a correlation with IgE and IL-18 levels, as patients who had high IgE levels also had high IL-18 levels, compared with controls. Conclusion. IL-18 seems to play an important role in the pathogenesis of AD, but this requires further study. IL-18 could be a useful clinical marker of disease severity in AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. The flexor carpi radialis (FCR) tendon is frequently selected for use as an interposition graft, for tendon transfers, and as a landmark for volar forearm approaches. Original surgical techniques of FCR harvest recommend incision placement 10 cm proximal to wrist crease. To date no anatomic study has been conducted to precisely define the location of the FCR myotendinous junction. Methods. 5 fresh frozen cadavers were dissected, exposing the full length of the FCR. The radial styloid (RS) was selected as a distal anatomic landmark, the medial epicondyle (ME) was chosen as a proximal landmark. All measurements were taken along the length of the FCR tendon. As the FCR myotendinous junction is chevron shaped, we marked both the proximal myotendinous junction (PMT) and distal myotendinous junction (DMT), with the DMT indicating the beginning of purely tendinous FCR. Four measurements were taken for each arm: 1) RS to DMT, 2) RS to PMT, 3) ME to PMT, 4) ME to DMT. Results. Pearson correlation coefficient comparing tendinous length of the FCR to the overall forearm length was 0.896 indicating a strong positive correlation (p = 0.040). The mean ratio of tendinous FCR length to forearm length was 0.42 ± 0.05, ranging from 0.38 to 0.50. This correlated to a distance 11.7 ± 2.3 cm proximal from the radial styloid. Conclusions. This study demonstrates the location of the myotendinous junction of the FCR. Our results suggest incision placement 10 cm from proximal wrist crease to be unreliable in forearms too short or too long. Instead, we recommend measuring 40% of the length from RS to ME as a more consistent marker for FCR harvest. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a study which examines the relationship between the -137G/C IL-18 gene polymorphism and atopic dermatitis. The researchers in the study analyzed the data of 67 patients with atopic dermatitis and 46 healthy controls by amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction. The results suggest that single nucleotide polymorphism at position -137 is an important determinant in the development of atopic dermatitis.

Dr. Chernyshov, Dr. Stalder, Dr. Svensson, Dr. Kunz reports no conflict of interest. At least 3 weeks are recommended between the two COVID-19 vaccine doses, which increases the risk of AD flares and loss of AD control if the systemic AD medication is paused or reduced in dose for longer periods. European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis: position on vaccination of adult patients with atopic dermatitis against COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) being treated with systemic medication and biologics. [Extracted from the article]

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a highly pruritic, chronic inflammatory skin disease. The diagnosis is made using evaluated clinical criteria. Disease activity and burden are best measured with a composite score, assessing both objective and subjective symptoms, such as SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD). AD management must take into account clinical and pathogenic variabilities, the patient's age and also target flare prevention. Basic therapy includes hydrating and barrier‐stabilizing topical treatment universally applied, as well as avoiding specific and unspecific provocation factors. Visible skin lesions are treated with anti‐inflammatory topical agents such as corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus and pimecrolimus), which are preferred in sensitive locations. Topical tacrolimus and some mid‐potency corticosteroids are proven agents for proactive therapy, which is defined as the long‐term intermittent anti‐inflammatory therapy of frequently relapsing skin areas. Systemic anti‐inflammatory or immunosuppressive treatment is a rapidly changing field requiring monitoring. Oral corticosteroids have a largely unfavourable benefit–risk ratio. The IL‐4R‐blocker dupilumab is a safe, effective and licensed, but expensive, treatment option with potential ocular side‐effects. Other biologicals targeting key pathways in the atopic immune response, as well as different Janus kinase inhibitors, are among emerging treatment options. Dysbalanced microbial colonization and infection may induce disease exacerbation and can justify additional antimicrobial treatment. Systemic antihistamines (H1R‐blockers) only have limited effects on AD‐related itch and eczema lesions. Adjuvant therapy includes UV irradiation, preferably narrowband UVB or UVA1. Coal tar may be useful for atopic hand and foot eczema. Dietary recommendations should be patient‐specific, and elimination diets should only be advised in case of proven food allergy. Allergen‐specific immunotherapy to aeroallergens may be useful in selected cases. Psychosomatic counselling is recommended to address stress‐induced exacerbations. Efficacy‐proven 'Eczema school' educational programmes and therapeutic patient education are recommended for both children and adults. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Editor Atopic dermatitis (AD), a common inflammatory skin condition characterized by chronic or relapsing episodes of eczema, itch and sleep disturbance,1 is associated with psychiatric, infectious and allergic comorbidities. Dr. Hijnen has been investigator, speaker or consultant for Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Incyte, LeoPharma, MedImmune/Astrazeneca, Pfizer, Sanofi and ThermoFisher. Dr. Ring has been an advisor or speaker for AbbVie, Allergika, Sanofi-Genzyme, Pfizer, Bencard, LEO Pharma and Mylan. [Extracted from the article]

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease that affects both children and adults, including a large number of adults of reproductive age. Several guidelines for the treatment of AD exist, yet specific recommendations for the treatment of pregnant or lactating women and for adults planning to have a child are often lacking. This position paper from the European Task force on Atopic Dermatitis (ETFAD) is based on up‐to‐date scientific literature on treating pregnant and lactating women as wells as adults with AD planning to have a child. It is based on the expert opinions of members of the ETFAD and on existing safety data on the proposed treatments, many of which are derived from patients with other inflammatory diseases or from transplantation medicine. For treating future parents, as well as pregnant and lactating women with AD, the use of topical treatments including moisturizers, topical corticosteroids, tacrolimus, antiseptics such as chlorhexidine, octenidine, potassium permanganate and sodium hypochlorite (bleach) is deemed to be safe. Ultraviolet (UV) therapy may also be used. Systemic treatment should be prescribed only after careful consideration. According to the opinion of the ETFAD, treatment should be restricted to systemic corticosteroids and cyclosporine A, and, in selected cases, azathioprine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The first dermatology‐specific proxy health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument for children 0–4 years old with skin diseases, the Infants and Toddlers Dermatology Quality of Life (InToDermQoL), was recently developed. In order to avoid the problem of cross‐cultural inequivalence focus groups work and pilot tests were organized simultaneously in all national centres of the project. The InToDermQoL showed good comprehensibility, clarity and acceptance. Objective: To validate the InToDermQoL questionnaire during international field tests. Methods: Internal consistency, test–retest reliability, convergent and discriminant validity of the InToDermQoL questionnaire were checked during international field tests. Results: Parents of 473 children with skin diseases filled in the national language versions of the InToDermQoL questionnaire. All three age‐specific versions of the InToDermQoL questionnaire with 10, 12 and 15 items, respectively, showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.90–0.93), good test–retest reliability (correlation coefficients > 0.9), significant correlations with the most widely used atopic dermatitis‐specific proxy instrument, the Infants Dermatitis Quality of Life Index (correlation coefficients 0.68–0.79). The InToDermQoL versions for children <3 years old well correlated with the atopic dermatis severity measure Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis (correlation coefficients 0.66 and 0.86 for 10 and 12 items versions, respectively). The InToDermQoL questionnaire discriminated well among different diagnoses and disease severity levels. Conclusion: Our field tests confirmed internal consistency, test–retest reliability, convergent and discriminant validity of the InToDermQoL questionnaire. Development and validation of the InToDermQoL questionnaire make it possible to assess dermatology‐specific aspects of HRQoL in youngest children with skin diseases. There are many reasons to assess HRQoL in dermatologic clinical practice, and we hope that our new instrument will be used internationally in paediatric dermatology for research and practical needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Adherence to topical corticosteroids ( TCS) is essential for the effective treatment of atopic dermatitis but can be limited by concerns about their use. This study examined the feasibility of applying the validated TOPICOP score for assessing TCS phobia across different countries. Methods This was a prospective multicentre feasibility study conducted in 21 hospitals in 17 countries. Patients >3 months of age with atopic dermatitis or their parents or legal representatives completed a validated translation of the TOPICOP questionnaire in the country's native language. Respondents also completed questionnaires collecting opinions about the feasibility and acceptability of the TOPICOP questionnaire. Results A total of 1564 participants in 15 countries were included in the analysis. 81% of respondents considered the questions clear or very clear, and 79% reported that it took less than 5 minutes to complete. Each of the individual items in the TOPICOP questionnaire was considered to be not at all difficult to answer by 49% to 74% of participants. The mean global TOPICOP score was 44.7%±20.5. Mean TOPICOP subscores were 37.0±22.8% for knowledge and beliefs, 54.7±27.8% for fears and 50.1±29.1% for behaviours. Global scores and subscores differed between countries, although the subscores did not always vary in parallel, suggesting different levels of TCS phobia and different drivers for each country. Conclusions The TOPICOP score can be feasibly applied across countries and may therefore be useful for obtaining qualitative and quantitative data from international studies and for adapting patient education and treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atopic dermatitis ( AD) is a clinically defined, highly pruritic, chronic inflammatory skin disease of children and adults. The diagnosis is made using evaluated clinical criteria. Disease activity is best measured with a composite score assessing both objective signs and subjective symptoms, such as SCORAD. The management of AD must consider the clinical and pathogenic variabilities of the disease and also target flare prevention. Basic therapy includes hydrating topical treatment, as well as avoidance of specific and unspecific provocation factors. Anti-inflammatory treatment of visible skin lesions is based on topical glucocorticosteroids and the topical calcineurin inhibitors tacrolimus and pimecrolimus. Topical calcineurin inhibitors are preferred in sensitive locations. Tacrolimus and mid-potent steroids are proven for proactive therapy, which is long-term intermittent anti-inflammatory therapy of the frequently relapsing skin areas. Systemic anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive treatment is indicated for severe refractory cases. Biologicals targeting key mechanisms of the atopic immune response are promising emerging treatment options. Microbial colonization and superinfection may induce disease exacerbation and can justify additional antimicrobial treatment. Systemic antihistamines (H1R-blockers) may diminish pruritus, but do not have sufficient effect on lesions. Adjuvant therapy includes UV irradiation, preferably UVA1 or narrow-band UVB 311 nm. Dietary recommendations should be patient specific and elimination diets should only be advised in case of proven food allergy. Allergen-specific immunotherapy to aeroallergens may be useful in selected cases. Psychosomatic counselling is recommended to address stress-induced exacerbations. 'Eczema school' educational programmes have been proven to be helpful for children and adults. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Diffuse cutaneous mastocytosis (DCM) is an extremely rare disease characterized by mast cell (MCs) infiltration of the entire skin. Little is known about the natural course of DCM. Objectives We decided to characterize clinical manifestations, the frequency of MCs mediator-related symptoms and anaphylaxis, risk of systemic mastocytosis (SM) and prognosis, based on 10 cases of DCM, the largest series published to date. Methods Diffuse cutaneous mastocytosis, DCM was confirmed by histopathological examination of skin samples in all cases. SCORing Mastocytosis (SCORMA) Index was used to assess the intensity of DCM. The analysis of clinical symptoms and laboratory tests, including serum tryptase levels was performed. Bone marrow biopsy was done only in selected cases. Results Large haemorrhagic bullous variant of DCM (five cases) and infiltrative small vesicular variant (five cases) were identified. The skin symptoms appeared in age-dependent manner; blistering predominated in infancy, whereas grain-leather appearance of the skin and pseudoxanthomatous presentation developed with time. SM was not recognized in any of the patients. Mast cell mediator-related symptoms were present in all cases. Anaphylactic shock occurred in three patients. Follow-up performed in seven cases revealed slight improvement of skin symptoms, reflected by decrease of SCORMA Index in all of them. Serum tryptase levels declined with time in six cases. Conclusions Diffuse cutaneous mastocytosis, DCM is a heterogeneous, severe, cutaneous disease, associated with mediator-related symptoms and risk of anaphylactic shock. Although our results suggest generally favourable prognosis, the review of the literature indicate that SM may occur. Therefore, more guarded prognosis should be given in DCM patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis statement on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) infection and atopic dermatitis Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a complex disease with elevated risk of respiratory comorbidities.[[1]] Severely affected patients are often treated with immune-modulating systemic drugs.[[3]] On 11 March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the 2019 novel coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-Cov-2) epidemic to be a pandemic. If systemic treatment of AD needs to be paused, patients should be supplied with ample topical therapy and guidance on the amount needed to prevent flares until systemic therapy can be reinstated. [Extracted from the article]

A letter to the editor is presented regarding the study on the association of interleukin-31 (IL-31) with severity of atopic dermatitis (AD) and pruritus.