Search

CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology is an indispensable and powerful tool in the field of cancer biology. To conduct successful CRISPR-based experiments, it is crucial that sgRNAs generate their designed alterations. Here, we describe a simple and efficient sgRNA screening method for validating sgRNAs that generate oncogenic gene rearrangements. We used IL3-independence in Ba/F3 cells as an assay to identify sgRNA pairs that generate fusion oncogenes involving theRetandNtrk1tyrosine kinases. We confirmed these rearrangements with PCR or RT-PCR as well as sequencing. Ba/F3 cells harboringRetorNtrk1rearrangements acquired sensitivity to RET and TRK inhibitors, respectively. Adenoviruses encoding Cas9 and sgRNAs that catalyze theKif5b-RetandTrim24-Retrearrangements were intratracheally instilled into mice and yielded lung adenocarcinomas. A cell line (TR.1) was established from aTrim24-Retpositive tumor that exhibited highin vitrosensitivity to RET-specific TKIs. Moreover, orthotopic transplantation of TR.1 cells into the left lung yielded well-defined tumors that shrank in response to LOXO-292 treatment. The method offers an efficient means to validate sgRNAs that successfully target their intended loci for the generation of novel murine oncogene-driven tumor models.

Figure S1. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of FGFR1 gene copy number status in mesothelioma cell lines. Figure S2. Bioluminescence imaging of orthotopically implanted H226 tumors treated with or without ponatinib. Supplementary Tables S1 through S3.

Purpose: FGFR1 copy-number gain (CNG) occurs in head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCC) and is used for patient selection in FGFR-specific inhibitor clinical trials. This study explores FGFR1 mRNA and protein levels in HNSCC cell lines, primary tumors, and patient-derived xenografts (PDX) as predictors of sensitivity to the FGFR inhibitor, NVP-BGJ398.Experimental Design: FGFR1 status, expression levels, and BGJ398 sensitive growth were measured in 12 HNSCC cell lines. Primary HNSCCs (n = 353) were assessed for FGFR1 CNG and mRNA levels, and HNSCC TCGA data were interrogated as an independent sample set. HNSCC PDXs (n = 39) were submitted to FGFR1 copy-number detection and mRNA assays to identify putative FGFR1-dependent tumors.Results: Cell line sensitivity to BGJ398 is associated with FGFR1 mRNA and protein levels, not FGFR1 CNG. Thirty-one percent of primary HNSCC tumors expressed FGFR1 mRNA, 18% exhibited FGFR1 CNG, 35% of amplified tumors were also positive for FGFR1 mRNA. This relationship was confirmed with the TCGA dataset. Using high FGFR1 mRNA for selection, 2 HNSCC PDXs were identified, one of which also exhibited FGFR1 CNG. The nonamplified tumor with high mRNA levels exhibited in vivo sensitivity to BGJ398.Conclusions: FGFR1 expression associates with BGJ398 sensitivity in HNSCC cell lines and predicts tyrosine kinase inhibitor sensitivity in PDXs. Our results support FGFR1 mRNA or protein expression, rather than FGFR1 CNG as a predictive biomarker for the response to FGFR inhibitors in a subset of patients suffering from HNSCC. Clin Cancer Res; 21(19); 4356–64. ©2015 AACR.

Figure S6. Correlation of HPV-expression and FGFR1 mRNA expression.

XLSX file - 66KB, Table S1. Compiled and tabulated ponatinib IC50 values, FGF and FGFR expression, FGFR1 gene copy number and characteristics of the 58 lung cancer cell lines.

Table S1. The panel of HNSCC PDXs was submitted to FGFR1 gene copy number (GCN) by CISH and mRNA levels by in situ hybridization (ISH) assay.

Purpose: We previously reported that a fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor (FGFR) signaling pathway drives growth of lung cancer cell lines of squamous and large cell histologies. Herein, we explored FGFR dependency in cell lines derived from the tobacco-related malignancy, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).Experimental Design: FGF and FGFR mRNA and protein expression was assessed in nine HNSCC cell lines. Dependence on secreted FGF2 for cell growth was tested with FP-1039, an FGFR1-Fc fusion protein. FGFR and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) dependence was defined by sensitivity to multiple inhibitors selective for FGFRs or EGFR.Results: FGF2 was expressed in eight of the nine HNSCC cell lines examined. Also, FGFR2 and FGFR3 were frequently expressed, whereas only two lines expressed FGFR1. FP-1039 inhibited growth of HNSCC cell lines expressing FGF2, identifying FGF2 as an autocrine growth factor. FGFR inhibitors selectively reduced in vitro growth and extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling in three HNSCC cell lines, whereas three distinct lines exhibited responsiveness to both EGFR and FGFR inhibitors. Combinations of these drugs yielded additive growth inhibition. Finally, three cell lines were highly sensitive to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) with no contribution from FGFR pathways.Conclusions: FGFR signaling was dominant or codominant with EGFR in six HNSCC lines, whereas three lines exhibited little or no role for FGFRs and were highly EGFR dependent. Thus, the HNSCC cell lines can be divided into subsets defined by sensitivity to EGFR and FGFR-specific TKIs. FGFR inhibitors may represent novel therapeutics to deploy alone or in combination with EGFR inhibitors in HNSCC. Clin Cancer Res; 17(15); 5016–25. ©2011 AACR.

PDF file - 786KB, Figure S1. FGFR1 immunoblots of extracts from lung cancer cell lines representative of the 58 cell lines employed in the studies. Figure S2. Images and quantification of clonogenic growth assays in selected lung cancer cell lines following shRNA-mediated FGFR1 silencing. Figure S3. Dose response curve for inhibition of Colo699 cell growth by the FGF ligand trap, FP-1039. Figure S4. Venn diagram of the overlap of FGFR1, FGF2 and FGF9 expression in ponatinib-sensitive lung cancer cell lines and splicing status of FGFR2 in H1581 and H1048 cells. Figure S5. Graph of ROC analysis of FGFR1 GCN and mRNA expression in a TMA comprised of 21 lung cancer cell lines. Figure S6. Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival of lung cancer patients with increased FGFR1 GCN or high mRNA. Figure S7. Venn diagram showing overlap of FGF2 and FGF9 expression with FGFR1 mRNA positivity in primary lung squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas analyzed by the Cancer Genome Atlas.

PDF file - 168K

XLSX file - 106KB, Table S5. Tabulated FGFR1, FGF2 and FGF9 mRNA expression values, FGFR1 CNV values and mutation status of TCGA lung adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas.

PDF file - 90KB, Table S2. Tabulated expression values for selected FGFs in lung cancer cell lines from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia. Table S3. Tabulated FGFR1 gene copy number values determined by SISH and associated patient data for the surgical lung cancer cohort. Table S4. Tabulated FGFR1 mRNA expression values determined by ISH and associated patient data for the surgical lung cancer cohort.

The FGFR1 is a therapeutic target under investigation in multiple solid tumors and clinical trials of selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are underway. Treatment with a single TKI represents a logical step toward personalized cancer therapy, but intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms limit their long-term benefit. In this study, we deployed RNAi-based functional genomic screens to identify protein kinases controlling the intrinsic sensitivity of FGFR1-dependent lung cancer and head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) cells to ponatinib, a multikinase FGFR-active inhibitor. We identified and validated a synthetic lethal interaction between MTOR and ponatinib in non–small cell lung carcinoma cells. In addition, treatment with MTOR-targeting shRNAs and pharmacologic inhibitors revealed that MTOR is an essential protein kinase in other FGFR1-expressing cancer cells. The combination of FGFR inhibitors and MTOR or AKT inhibitors resulted in synergistic growth suppression in vitro. Notably, tumor xenografts generated from FGFR1-dependent lung cancer cells exhibited only modest sensitivity to monotherapy with the FGFR-specific TKI, AZD4547, but when combined with the MTOR inhibitor, AZD2014, significantly attenuated tumor growth and prolonged survival. Our findings support the existence of a signaling network wherein FGFR1-driven ERK and activated MTOR/AKT represent distinct arms required to induce full transformation. Furthermore, they suggest that clinical efficacy of treatments for FGFR1-driven lung cancers and HNSCC may be achieved by combining MTOR inhibitors and FGFR-specific TKIs. Cancer Res; 75(20); 4398–406. ©2015 AACR.

Supplementary Methods, Figures S1-S12, Tables S1-S2. Figure S1. Overview of workflow for the synthetic lethal and essential gene screens. Figure S2. Procedure for isolating and barcoding PCR-amplified shRNA sequences. Figure S3. Growth inhibition of H157 cells by ponatinib in combination with MTOR inhibitor, AZD8055. Figure S4. Relative sensitivity of cancer cell lines to MTOR inhibitor AZD8055 using a cell proliferation assay. Figure S5. Dose response curves for growth inhibition of cancer cell lines by rapamycin. Figure S6. Growth inhibition by FGFR inhibitors in combination with MTOR inhibitor, AZD8055. Figure S7. Synergistic growth inhibition of CCL30 HNSCC cells by AZD4547 and AZD8055. Figure S8. Growth inhibition of Colo699 and H1581 cells by AZD4547 and rapamycin. Figure S9. Signal pathway inhibition by FGFR TKIs and rapamycin alone, and in combination. Figure S10. Growth inhibition by AKT inhibitors alone and combined with ponatinib on Colo699 cells. Figure S11. Combination ponatinib and AKT inhibitor GSK690693 yields synergistic in vitro growth inhibition. Figure S12. Combination AZD4547 and AZD2014 provides superior growth inhibition of Colo699 xenografts. Table S1. Primers used for sample preparation for Illumina sequencing. Table S2. Ranking of Synthetic Lethal Hits with ponatinib Treatment.

Lung cancers bearing oncogenically-mutated EGFR represent a significant fraction of lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs) for which EGFR-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) provide a highly effective therapeutic approach. However, these lung cancers eventually acquire resistance and undergo progression within a characteristically broad treatment duration range. Our previous study of EGFR mutant lung cancer biopsies highlighted the positive association of a TKI-induced interferon γ transcriptional response with increased time to treatment progression. To test the hypothesis that host immunity contributes to the TKI response, we developed novel genetically-engineered mouse models of EGFR mutant lung cancer bearing exon 19 deletions (del19) or the L860R missense mutation. Both oncogenic EGFR mouse models developed multifocal LUADs from which transplantable cancer cell lines sensitive to the EGFR-specific TKIs, gefitinib and osimertinib, were derived. When propagated orthotopically in the left lungs of syngeneic C57BL/6 mice, deep and durable shrinkage of the cell line-derived tumors was observed in response to daily treatment with osimertinib. By contrast, orthotopic tumors propagated in immune deficientnu/numice exhibited modest tumor shrinkage followed by rapid progression on continuous osimertinib treatment. Importantly, osimertinib treatment significantly increased intratumoral CD3+ T cell content relative to diluent treatment. The findings provide strong evidence supporting the requirement for adaptive immunity in the durable therapeutic control of EGFR mutant lung cancer.

The KRAS(G12C) mutation is the most common genetic mutation in North American lung adenocarcinoma patients. Recently, direct inhibitors of the KRASG12C protein have been developed and demonstrate clinical response rates of 37-43%. Importantly, these agents fail to generate durable therapeutic responses with median progression-free survival of ~6.5 months. To provide models for further preclinical improvement of these inhibitors, we generated three novel murine KRASG12C-driven lung cancer cell lines. The co-occurring NRASQ61L mutation in KRASG12C-positive LLC cells was deleted and the KRASG12V allele in CMT167 cells was edited to KRASG12C with CRISPR/Cas9 methods. Also, a novel murine KRASG12C line, mKRC.1, was established from a tumor generated in a genetically-engineered mouse model. The three lines exhibit similar in vitro sensitivities to KRASG12C inhibitors (MRTX-1257, AMG-510), but distinct in vivo responses to MRTX-849 ranging from progressive growth with orthotopic LLC-NRAS KO tumors to marked shrinkage with mKRC.1 tumors. All three cell lines exhibited synergistic in vitro growth inhibition with MRTX-1257 and the SHP2 inhibitor, RMC-4550 and the MRTX-849/RMC-4550 combination yielded tumor shrinkage in orthotopic LLC-NRAS KO tumors propagated in syngeneic mice. Notably, this synergistic combination response was lost in athymic nu/nu mice, supporting a growing literature demonstrating a role for adaptive immunity in the response to this class of drugs. These new models of murine KRASG12C mutant lung cancer should prove valuable for identifying improved therapeutic combination strategies with KRASG12C inhibitors.Contribution to the Field StatementThe development of KRASG12C inhibitors has not impacted treatment of lung cancers bearing the KRASG12C mutation to the degree that tyrosine kinase inhibitors have changed the treatment outcomes for patients bearing oncogenic mutations in receptor tyrosine kinases. Thus, the field is now exploring combination strategies with KRASG12C inhibitors that may enhance their clinical benefit. Moreover, published findings indicate that host immunity contributes to efficacy of oncogene-directed inhibitors including KRASG12C inhibitors. Thus, these novel murine KRASG12C-driven lung cancer cell lines will provide valuable models for preclinical evaluation of novel drug combinations in immune competent hosts.

PurposeLung cancers bearing oncogenic EML4-ALK fusions respond to targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs; e.g. alectinib), with variation in the degree of shrinkage and duration of treatment (DOT). We previously demonstrated a positive association of a TKI-induced interferon gamma (IFNγ) transcriptional response with DOT in EGFR-mutant lung cancers. Herein, we used murine models of EML4-ALK lung cancer to test a role for host immunity in the therapeutic response to alectinib.Experimental DesignThree murine EML4-ALK cell lines (EA1, EA2, EA3) were implanted orthotopically into the lungs of immunocompetent and immunodeficient mice and treated with alectinib. Tumor volumes were serially measured by μCT. Immune cell content was measured by flow cytometry, multispectral immunofluorescence and CyTOF. Transcriptional responses to alectinib were assessed by RNAseq and secreted chemokines were measured by ELISA.ResultsAll cell lines were sensitive to alectinib in vitro. EA1 and EA3 tumors retained residual disease that rapidly progressed upon termination of treatment while EA2 tumors were eliminated by TKI treatment. Alectinib induced inflammatory transcriptional programs and multiple chemokines in all cell lines while untreated tumors exhibited distinct baseline chemokine expression patterns and content of CD8+ T cells and myeloid subsets. When propagated in immune-deficient mice, all three cell line-derived lung tumor models exhibited significant shrinkage followed by prompt progression despite continuous alectinib treatment.ConclusionsThe findings support an hypothesis that host and TKI-stimulated production of chemokines by tumor cells promotes functional engagement of adaptive immune cells within the tumor microenvironment that enhances the durability and depth of TKI response.Statement of Translational RelevancePatients with metastatic lung cancer harboring ALK fusions are treated with targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in the first line setting. Despite bearing the same driver oncogene, patients experience a range of tumor burden reduction and variable amounts of residual disease. Residual disease burden associates with patient survival and contributes to the emergence of drug resistance yielding treatment failure. The factors mediating this differential response to TKI and residual disease are incompletely understood. Our group has developed a panel of murine ALK driven lung cancer cell lines that reproducibly show differences in the depth and duration of response when implanted into immunocompetent mice. Data using this model indicate that the presence of CD8+ T cells is a major contributor to the depth and duration of response. These models will be critical in developing rational combination therapies to augment the immune microenvironment engagement along with TKIs to improve outcomes for these patients.

The inhibitory epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody, cetuximab, is an approved therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Despite tumor response observed in some HNSCC patients, cetuximab alone or combined with radio- or chemotherapy fails to yield long-term control or cures. We hypothesize that a flexible receptor tyrosine kinase coactivation signaling network supports HNSCC survival in the setting of EGFR blockade, and that drugs disrupting this network will provide superior tumor control when combined with EGFR inhibitors. In this work, we submitted EGFR-dependent HNSCC cell lines to RNA interference-based functional genomics screens to identify, in an unbiased fashion, essential protein kinases for growth and survival as well as synthetic lethal targets for combined inhibition with EGFR antagonists. Mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase (MTOR) and erythroblastosis oncogene B (ERBB)3 were identified as high-ranking essential kinase hits in the HNSCC cell lines. MTOR dependency was confirmed by distinct short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) and high sensitivity of the cell lines to AZD8055, whereas ERBB3 dependency was validated by shRNA-mediated silencing. Furthermore, a synthetic lethal kinome shRNA screen with a pan-ERBB inhibitor, AZD8931, identified multiple components of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, consistent with ERK reactivation and/or incomplete ERK pathway inhibition in response to EGFR inhibitor monotherapy. As validation, distinct mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors yielded synergistic growth inhibition when combined with the EGFR inhibitors, gefitinib and AZD8931. The findings identify ERBB3 and MTOR as important pharmacological vulnerabilities in HNSCC and support combining MEK and EGFR inhibitors to enhance clinical efficacy in HNSCC. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Many cancers are driven by nonmutated receptor tyrosine kinase coactivation networks that defy full inhibition with single targeted drugs. This study identifies erythroblastosis oncogene B (ERBB)3 as an essential protein kinase in epidermal growth factor receptor–dependent head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) cell lines and a synthetic lethal interaction with the extracellular signal-regulated kinase mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway that provides a rationale for combining pan-ERBB and mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors as a therapeutic approach in subsets of HNSCC.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting EGFR-mutant lung cancers promote a range of tumor regression responses to yield variable residual disease, a likely incubator for acquired resistance. Herein, rapid transcriptional responses induced by TKIs early in treatment that associate with the range of patient responses were explored. RNAseq was performed on EGFR mutant cell lines treated in vitro with osimertinib and on tumor biopsies of eight EGFR mutant lung cancer patients before and after 2 weeks of TKI treatment. Data were evaluated for gene expression programs altered upon TKI treatment. Chemokine and cytokine expression were measured by ELISA and quantitative RT-PCR. IκB Kinase (IKK) and JAK-STAT pathway dependence was tested with pharmacologic and molecular inhibitors. Tumor sections were stained for the T-cell marker CD3. Osimertinib stimulated dynamic, yet wide-ranging interferon (IFN) program regulation in EGFR mutant cell lines. IL6 and CXCL10 induction varied markedly among the EGFR mutant cell lines and was sensitive to IKK and JAK-STAT inhibitors. Analysis of matched patient biopsy pairs revealed marked, yet varied enrichment of IFN transcriptional programs, effector immune cell signatures and T-cell content in treated tumors that positively correlated with time to progression in the patients. EGFR-specific TKIs induce wide-ranging IFN response program activation originating within the cancer cell. The strong association of IFN program induction and duration of clinical response indicates that the TKI-induced IFN program instructs variable recruitment and participation of immune cells in the overall therapeutic response.

The nontaxane microtubule inhibitor eribulin is an approved therapeutic for metastatic breast cancer and liposarcoma. Eribulin was previously tested in unselected patients with lung cancer and yielded a modest objective response rate of ∼5%–12%. Because lung cancers represent diverse histologies and driving oncogenic mutations, we postulated that eribulin may exhibit properties of a precision oncology agent with a previously undefined specificity for a molecularly distinct subset of lung cancers. Herein, we screened a panel of 44 non–small cell and small-cell lung cancer cell lines for in vitro growth sensitivity to eribulin. The results revealed a greater than 15,000-fold range in eribulin sensitivity (IC50 = 0.005–89 nM) among the cell lines that was not correlated with their sensitivity to the taxane-based inhibitor paclitaxel. The quartile of cell lines exhibiting the lowest eribulin IC50 values was not enriched for specific histologies, epithelial-mesenchymal differentiation, or specific oncogene drivers but was significantly enriched for nonsense/frameshift TP53 mutations and low-TP53 mRNA but not missense TP53 mutations. By comparison, the mutation status of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A, STK11, and KEAP1 was not associated with eribulin sensitivity. Finally, the highest eribulin IC50 quartile (>1 nM) exhibited significantly elevated mRNA expression of the drug pump, ATP binding cassette B1, defined resistance mechanism to eribulin, and paclitaxel. The findings support further investigations into basic mechanisms by which complete lack of TP53 function regulates anticancer activity of eribulin and the potential utility of TP53 null phenotypes distinct from TP53 missense mutations as a biomarker of response in patients with lung cancer. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Distinct from precision oncology agents that are matched to cancers bearing oncogenically activated versions of their targets, microtubule inhibitors, such as eribulin, are deployed in an unselected manner. The results in this study demonstrate that lung cancer cell lines exhibiting the highest sensitivity to eribulin bear TP53 null phenotypes, supporting a rationale to consider the status of this tumor suppressor in the clinical setting.

Background Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is frequently amplified or overexpressed in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and is a clinically validated target for the therapeutic antibody, cetuximab, in the management of this cancer. The degree of response to EGFR inhibitors measured by tumor shrinkage varies widely among HNSCC patients, and the biological mechanisms that underlie therapeutic heterogeneity amongst HNSCC patients remain ill-defined. Methods EGFR-dependent human and murine HNSCC cell lines were treated with the EGFR/ERBB inhibitors, gefitinib and AZD8931, and submitted to RNAseq, GSEA, and qRT-PCR. Conditioned media was analyzed by ELISA and Luminex assays. Murine HNSCC tumors were stained for T cell markers by immunofluorescence. Primary HSNCC patient specimens treated with single agent cetuximab were stained with Vectra multispectral immunofluorescence. Results The transcriptional reprogramming response to EGFR/ERBB-specific TKIs was measured in a panel of EGFR-dependent human HNSCC cell lines and interferon (IFN) α and γ responses identified as top-ranked TKI-induced pathways. Despite similar drug sensitivity, responses among 7 cell lines varied quantitatively and qualitatively, especially regarding the induced chemokine and cytokine profiles. Of note, the anti-tumorigenic chemokine, CXCL10, and the pro-tumorigenic factor, IL6, exhibited wide-ranging and non-overlapping induction. Similarly, AZD8931 exerted potent growth inhibition, IFNα/IFNγ pathway activation, and CXCL10 induction in murine B4B8 HNSCC cells. AZD8931 treatment of immune-competent mice bearing orthotopic B4B8 tumors increased CD8 + T cell content and the therapeutic response was abrogated in nu/nu mice relative to BALB/c mice. Finally, Vectra 3.0 analysis of HNSCC patient tumors prior to and after 3–4 weeks of single agent cetuximab treatment revealed increased CD8 + T cell content in specimens from patients exhibiting a therapeutic response relative to non-responders. Conclusions The findings reveal heterogeneous, tumor cell-intrinsic, EGFR/ERBB inhibitor-induced IFN pathway activation in HNSCC and suggest that individual tumor responses to oncogene-targeted agents are a sum of direct growth inhibitory effects and variably-induced participation of host immune cells.

Mutations in the KRAS oncogene are frequent in lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs). Unfortunately, KRAS lacks a pharmacologically available inhibitor for precision oncology. Immunotherapies have recently become available and are now FDA approved for LUAD, although only a subset of patients show clinical benefit. Recent work has unveiled biomarkers of immunotherapy response and include interferon γ (IFNγ) and T-cell inflamed gene signatures, suggesting that active IFN signaling within the tumor microenvironment (TME) and infiltration of antitumor T-cells are necessary for response. Thus, strategies that increase T-cell inflammation within LUAD are predicted to broaden immunotherapy response. Using human and murine KRAS-mutant LUAD cell lines, we demonstrated variable transcriptional induction of an innate immune response after 1-2-day treatment with the MEK inhibitor, trametinib. In particular, murine lung cancer cell lines 832B and LKR10 demonstrated induction of CXCL10 transcript, an innate immune chemotactic factor for effector T cells and natural killer (NK) cells. This variable induction was also seen at the protein level with CXCL10 protein increasing 8- and 4-fold, in 832B and LKR10 respectively, after a 3-day treatment. Human KRAS-mutant LUAD cell line, H358, exhibited a 17-fold induction in CXCL10 protein secretion following a 3-day treatment with trametinib. The mechanism(s) by which MAPK inhibition leads to induction of innate immune signaling remains ill defined. IKK-16, an inhibitor of IKKα/β and downstream NF-kB signaling, but not the JAK inhibitor, ruxolitinib, blocked trametinib-induced CXCL10 secretion in H358 cells. While the data support a central role for NF-kB signaling in this response, the complexity of innate immune signaling and IKK-NF-kB pathways prevents their full dissection with traditional candidate-based approaches. Therefore, we have initiated a functional genomics approach using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated tagging of the CXCL10gene in human lung cancer cell lines. While H358 cells are in process, we successfully generated EGFR mutant PC9 cells that bear GFP-tagged CXC10 and exhibit strong induction of CXCL10-GFP when treated with the 3rd-generation EGFR inhibitor, AZD9291. These CXCL10-GFP tagged cell lines will be deployed in functional genomics experiments to define in an unbiased manner signal pathway and transcription factor components that mediate oncogene-targeted drug-induced CXCL10 induction. A full elucidation of the mechanism by which oncogene pathways suppress innate immune pathways and CXCL10 expression may highlight novel ways in which to enhance antitumor inflammation and increase the depth of the therapeutic response to oncogene-targeted drugs. Citation Format: Daniel Sisler, Sean Korpela, Natalia Gurule, Trista Hinz, Lindsay Marek, Bonnie Bullock, Howard Li, Molishree Joshi, Colin Sempeck, Raphael Nemenoff, Lynn Heasley. MAPK regulation of an innate immune response in KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Targeting RAS-Driven Cancers; 2018 Dec 9-12; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2020;18(5_Suppl):Abstract nr B51.

To test whether a microRNA (miRNA) panel may serve as an alternative biomarker of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor sensitivity in lung cancer.Histologically diverse lung cancer cell lines were submitted to assays for ponatinib and AZD4547 sensitivity. miRNAs, FGFR1 messenger RNA, gene copy number, and protein expression were detected by real-time quantitative PCR, fluorescence in-situ hybridization, and immunoblotting in 34 lung cancer cell lines.Among 34 cell lines, 14 exhibited ponatinib sensitivity and 20 exhibited AZD4547 sensitivity (drug concentration causing 50% inhibition values 100 nmol/L). A total of 39 of the 377-miRNA set were initially identified from the 4 paired ponatinib-sensitive or -insensitive cell lines to have at least an 8-fold differential expression and then were detected in all the 34 cell lines. A predictive panel of 3 miRNAs (let-7c, miRNA155, and miRNA218) was developed that had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.886 with a sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 77.3% to predict response to ponatinib. The miRNA panel performed similar to FGFR1 protein expression (AUC = 0.864) and messenger RNA expression (AUC = 0.939), and better than FGFR1 amplification (AUC = 0.696). Furthermore, we validated this panel using data for sensitivity to AZD4547 in the cell line cohort with an AUC of 0.931 and a sensitivity of 73.3% and specificity of 76.2%, respectively.The developed miRNA panel (let-7c, miRNA155, and miRNA218) may be useful in predicting response to FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, either ponatinib or AZD4547 in lung cancer cell lines, and warrants further validation in the clinical setting.

Purpose: FGFR1 copy-number gain (CNG) occurs in head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCC) and is used for patient selection in FGFR-specific inhibitor clinical trials. This study explores FGFR1 mRNA and protein levels in HNSCC cell lines, primary tumors, and patient-derived xenografts (PDX) as predictors of sensitivity to the FGFR inhibitor, NVP-BGJ398. Experimental Design: FGFR1 status, expression levels, and BGJ398 sensitive growth were measured in 12 HNSCC cell lines. Primary HNSCCs (n = 353) were assessed for FGFR1 CNG and mRNA levels, and HNSCC TCGA data were interrogated as an independent sample set. HNSCC PDXs (n = 39) were submitted to FGFR1 copy-number detection and mRNA assays to identify putative FGFR1-dependent tumors. Results: Cell line sensitivity to BGJ398 is associated with FGFR1 mRNA and protein levels, not FGFR1 CNG. Thirty-one percent of primary HNSCC tumors expressed FGFR1 mRNA, 18% exhibited FGFR1 CNG, 35% of amplified tumors were also positive for FGFR1 mRNA. This relationship was confirmed with the TCGA dataset. Using high FGFR1 mRNA for selection, 2 HNSCC PDXs were identified, one of which also exhibited FGFR1 CNG. The nonamplified tumor with high mRNA levels exhibited in vivo sensitivity to BGJ398. Conclusions: FGFR1 expression associates with BGJ398 sensitivity in HNSCC cell lines and predicts tyrosine kinase inhibitor sensitivity in PDXs. Our results support FGFR1 mRNA or protein expression, rather than FGFR1 CNG as a predictive biomarker for the response to FGFR inhibitors in a subset of patients suffering from HNSCC. Clin Cancer Res; 21(19); 4356–64. ©2015 AACR.

Motivation: Targeted kinase inhibitors have dramatically improved cancer treatment, but kinase dependency for an individual patient or cancer cell can be challenging to predict. Kinase dependency does not always correspond with gene expression and mutation status. High-throughput drug screens are powerful tools for determining kinase dependency, but drug polypharmacology can make results difficult to interpret. Results: We developed Kinase Addiction Ranker (KAR), an algorithm that integrates high-throughput drug screening data, comprehensive kinase inhibition data and gene expression profiles to identify kinase dependency in cancer cells. We applied KAR to predict kinase dependency of 21 lung cancer cell lines and 151 leukemia patient samples using published datasets. We experimentally validated KAR predictions of FGFR and MTOR dependence in lung cancer cell line H1581, showing synergistic reduction in proliferation after combining ponatinib and AZD8055. Availability and implementation: KAR can be downloaded as a Python function or a MATLAB script along with example inputs and outputs at: http://tanlab.ucdenver.edu/KAR/. Contact: aikchoon.tan@ucdenver.edu Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Objectives Immunotherapy that targets the programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis has been approved for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in many countries. However, our current understanding of the role of immunotherapies on NSCLC patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, following acquisition of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), is so far unclear. Especially, there is little data on if each acquired resistance mechanism to EGFR-TKIs alters PD-L1 expression status which is employed as an important predictive biomarker for PD-1/PD-L1 targeting agents. Materials and methods Lung cancer cell lines (HCC827, HCC4006, PC9, H1975, H358, SW900, and H647) and their daughter cells that acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs or cytotoxic drugs (cisplatin or vinorelbine) were examined. PD-L1 expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry, immunoblotting, and/or fluorescent imaging. Published microarray data were also employed to evaluate our findings. Results and conclusion We found correlations between therapy-induced E-cadherin downregulation and decreased PD-L1 expression using our cell lines and published microarray data. ShRNA mediated E-cadherin knockdown decreased PD-L1 expression in parental cells, and dual immunofluorescent staining of E-cadherin and PD-L1 suggests co-localization of both molecules. We also observed marked downregulation of PD-L1 in cells with E-cadherin downregulation after chronic treatment with vinorelbine. These results indicate a correlation between therapy-induced E-cadherin downregulation and decreased PD-L1 expression, highlighting the importance of re-biopsy after acquisition of resistance to EGFR-TKIs, not only for the evaluation of resistance mechanisms but also for the determination of PD-L1 expression status.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is associated with asbestos exposure and is a cancer that has not been significantly affected by small molecule-based targeted therapeutics. Previously, we demonstrated the existence of functional subsets of lung cancer and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines in which fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) autocrine signaling functions as a nonmutated growth pathway. In a panel of pleural mesothelioma cell lines, FGFR1 and FGF2 were coexpressed in three of seven cell lines and were significantly associated with sensitivity to the FGFR-active tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), ponatinib, both in vitro and in vivo using orthotopically propagated xenografts. Furthermore, RNAi-mediated silencing confirmed the requirement for FGFR1 in specific mesothelioma cells and sensitivity to the FGF ligand trap, FP-1039, validated the requirement for autocrine FGFs. None of the FGFR1-dependent mesothelioma cells exhibited increased FGFR1 gene copy number, based on a FISH assay, indicating that increased FGFR1 transcript and protein expression were not mediated by gene amplification. Elevated FGFR1 mRNA was detected in a subset of primary MPM clinical specimens and like MPM cells; none harbored increased FGFR1 gene copy number. These results indicate that autocrine signaling through FGFR1 represents a targetable therapeutic pathway in MPM and that biomarkers distinct from increased FGFR1 gene copy number such as FGFR1 mRNA would be required to identify patients with MPM bearing tumors driven by FGFR1 activity. Implications: FGFR1 is a viable therapeutic target in a subset of MPMs, but FGFR TKI-responsive tumors will need to be selected by a biomarker distinct from increased FGFR1 gene copy number, possibly FGFR1 mRNA or protein levels. Mol Cancer Res; 12(10); 1460–9. ©2014 AACR.

Purpose: FGFR1 gene copy number (GCN) is being evaluated as a biomarker for FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) response in squamous cell lung cancers (SCC). The exclusive use of FGFR1 GCN for predicting FGFR TKI sensitivity assumes increased GCN is the only mechanism for biologically relevant increases in FGFR1 signaling. Herein, we tested whether FGFR1 mRNA and protein expression may serve as better biomarkers of FGFR TKI sensitivity in lung cancer. Experimental Design: Histologically diverse lung cancer cell lines were submitted to assays for ponatinib sensitivity, a potent FGFR TKI. A tissue microarray composed of resected lung tumors was submitted to FGFR1 GCN, and mRNA analyses and the results were validated with The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) lung cancer data. Results: Among 58 cell lines, 14 exhibited ponatinib sensitivity (IC50 values ≤ 50 nmol/L) that correlated with FGFR1 mRNA and protein expression, but not with FGFR1 GCN or histology. Moreover, ponatinib sensitivity associated with mRNA expression of the ligands, FGF2 and FGF9. In resected tumors, 22% of adenocarcinomas and 28% of SCCs expressed high FGFR1 mRNA. Importantly, only 46% of SCCs with increased FGFR1 GCN expressed high mRNA. Lung cancer TCGA data validated these findings and unveiled overlap of FGFR1 mRNA positivity with KRAS and PIK3CA mutations. Conclusions: FGFR1 dependency is frequent across various lung cancer histologies, and FGFR1 mRNA may serve as a better biomarker of FGFR TKI response in lung cancer than FGFR1 GCN. The study provides important and timely insight into clinical testing of FGFR TKIs in lung cancer and other solid tumor types. Clin Cancer Res; 20(12); 3299–309. ©2014 AACR.

Our laboratory has previously shown that some gefitinib-insensitive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines exhibit dominant autocrine fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling. Herein, we deployed a whole-genome loss-of-function screen to identify genes whose knockdown potentiated the inhibitory effect of the FGFR inhibitor, AZ8010, in HNSCC cell lines. Three HNSCC cell lines expressing a genome-wide small hairpin RNA (shRNA) library were treated with AZ8010 and the abundance of shRNA sequences was assessed by deep sequencing. Under-represented shRNAs in treated cells are expected to target genes important for survival with AZ8010 treatment. Synthetic lethal hits were validated with specific inhibitors and independent shRNAs. We found that multiple alternate receptors provided protection from FGFR inhibition, including receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), v-erb-b2 erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2 (ERBB2), and hepatocyte growth factor receptor (MET). We showed that specific knockdown of either ERBB2 or MET in combination with FGFR inhibition led to increased inhibition of growth relative to FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment alone. These results were confirmed using specific small molecule inhibitors of either ERBB family members or MET. Moreover, the triple combination of FGFR, MET, and ERBB family inhibitors showed the largest inhibition of growth and induction of apoptosis compared with the double combinations. These results reveal a role for alternate RTKs in maintaining progrowth and survival signaling in HNSCC cells in the setting of FGFR inhibition. Thus, improved therapies for HNSCC patients could involve rationally designed combinations of TKIs targeting FGFR, ERBB family members, and MET.

Purpose: We previously reported that a fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor (FGFR) signaling pathway drives growth of lung cancer cell lines of squamous and large cell histologies. Herein, we explored FGFR dependency in cell lines derived from the tobacco-related malignancy, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Experimental Design: FGF and FGFR mRNA and protein expression was assessed in nine HNSCC cell lines. Dependence on secreted FGF2 for cell growth was tested with FP-1039, an FGFR1-Fc fusion protein. FGFR and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) dependence was defined by sensitivity to multiple inhibitors selective for FGFRs or EGFR. Results: FGF2 was expressed in eight of the nine HNSCC cell lines examined. Also, FGFR2 and FGFR3 were frequently expressed, whereas only two lines expressed FGFR1. FP-1039 inhibited growth of HNSCC cell lines expressing FGF2, identifying FGF2 as an autocrine growth factor. FGFR inhibitors selectively reduced in vitro growth and extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling in three HNSCC cell lines, whereas three distinct lines exhibited responsiveness to both EGFR and FGFR inhibitors. Combinations of these drugs yielded additive growth inhibition. Finally, three cell lines were highly sensitive to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) with no contribution from FGFR pathways. Conclusions: FGFR signaling was dominant or codominant with EGFR in six HNSCC lines, whereas three lines exhibited little or no role for FGFRs and were highly EGFR dependent. Thus, the HNSCC cell lines can be divided into subsets defined by sensitivity to EGFR and FGFR-specific TKIs. FGFR inhibitors may represent novel therapeutics to deploy alone or in combination with EGFR inhibitors in HNSCC. Clin Cancer Res; 17(15); 5016–25. ©2011 AACR.

The FGFR1 is a therapeutic target under investigation in multiple solid tumors and clinical trials of selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are underway. Treatment with a single TKI represents a logical step toward personalized cancer therapy, but intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms limit their long-term benefit. In this study, we deployed RNAi-based functional genomic screens to identify protein kinases controlling the intrinsic sensitivity of FGFR1-dependent lung cancer and head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) cells to ponatinib, a multikinase FGFR-active inhibitor. We identified and validated a synthetic lethal interaction between MTOR and ponatinib in non–small cell lung carcinoma cells. In addition, treatment with MTOR-targeting shRNAs and pharmacologic inhibitors revealed that MTOR is an essential protein kinase in other FGFR1-expressing cancer cells. The combination of FGFR inhibitors and MTOR or AKT inhibitors resulted in synergistic growth suppression in vitro. Notably, tumor xenografts generated from FGFR1-dependent lung cancer cells exhibited only modest sensitivity to monotherapy with the FGFR-specific TKI, AZD4547, but when combined with the MTOR inhibitor, AZD2014, significantly attenuated tumor growth and prolonged survival. Our findings support the existence of a signaling network wherein FGFR1-driven ERK and activated MTOR/AKT represent distinct arms required to induce full transformation. Furthermore, they suggest that clinical efficacy of treatments for FGFR1-driven lung cancers and HNSCC may be achieved by combining MTOR inhibitors and FGFR-specific TKIs. Cancer Res; 75(20); 4398–406. ©2015 AACR.

Despite initial and sometimes dramatic responses of specific NSCLC tumors to EGFR TKIs, nearly all will develop resistance and relapse. Gene expression analysis of NSCLC cell lines treated with the EGFR TKI, gefitinib, revealed increased levels of FGFR2 and FGFR3 mRNA. Analysis of gefitinib action on a larger panel of NSCLC cell lines verified that FGFR2 and FGFR3 expression is increased at the mRNA and protein level in NSCLC cell lines in which the EGFR is dominant for growth signaling, but not in cell lines where EGFR signaling is absent. A luciferase reporter containing 2.5 kilobases of fgfr2 5′ flanking sequence was activated after gefitinib treatment, indicating transcriptional regulation as a contributing mechanism controlling increased FGFR2 expression. Induction of FGFR2 and FGFR3 protein as well as fgfr2-luc activity was also observed with Erbitux, an EGFR-specific monoclonal antibody. Moreover, inhibitors of c-Src and MEK stimulated fgfr2-luc activity to a similar degree as gefitinib, suggesting that these pathways may mediate EGFR-dependent repression of FGFR2 and FGFR3. Importantly, our studies demonstrate that EGFR TKI-induced FGFR2 and FGFR3 are capable of mediating FGF2 and FGF7 stimulated ERK activation as well as FGF-stimulated transformed growth in the setting of EGFR TKIs. In conclusion, this study highlights EGFR TKI-induced FGFR2 and FGFR3 signaling as a novel and rapid mechanism of acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs and suggests that treatment of NSCLC patients with combinations of EGFR and FGFR specific TKIs may be a strategy to enhance efficacy of single EGFR inhibitors.

Purpose of Study: Although therapies targeting recently identified oncogenic drivers of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are in clinical use, a significant proportion of patients still lack a molecularly-targeted therapeutic option. Therefore, there is a continued need for development of new therapeutic strategies. We recently demonstrated oncogenic roles for Mer receptor tyrosine kinase in NSCLC. More specifically, we showed aberrant expression of Mer in approximately 70% of NSCLC patient samples compared to normal lung. Additionally, shRNA-mediated Mer inhibition resulted in increased cell death, decreased colony formation in clonogenic assays, increased chemosensitivity, and decreased tumorigenesis in murine xenografts. These data validate Mer as a potential therapeutic target in NSCLC. Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR) are another class of tyrosine kinases that are aberrantly expressed and function to promote tumorigenesis in NSCLC. FGFR inhibition has been validated as a therapeutic strategy in preclinical NSCLC models and several FGFR inhibitors are currently in clinical development for treatment of NSCLC. Although Mer can signal through both the MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT pathways, in NSCLC Mer signals mainly through PI3K/AKT. Because Mer and FGFR signal primarily through complementary pathways that mediate survival and proliferation (PI3K/AKT and MEK/ERK, respectively), we hypothesized that dual inhibition of FGFR and Mer may provide a therapeutic advantage relative to inhibition of either kinase alone. In this study we investigated the interaction between a novel Mer-selective small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and AZD-4547, an FGFR TKI, in NSCLC cell lines. Methods Used: Colo699 (Mer+, FGFR+) and H226 (Mer+, FGFR+) NSCLC cells were cultured for 14 days in soft agar in the presence of Mer TKI and/or AZD-4547, alone or in combination, and colonies were stained and counted. Changes in the activity of downstream signaling pathways, including PI3K/AKT, MEK/ERK, and STAT proteins were evaluated by immunoblotting. Results and Conclusions: In the soft agar assay, Colo699 and H226 colony formation was inhibited in the presence of Mer TKI and AZD-4547, both as single agents and in combination. Importantly, concurrent treatment with Mer TKI and AZD-4547 resulted in a greater decrease in colony-formation relative to either single agent. Immunoblotting revealed increased inhibition of pro-survival signaling in cells treated with both inhibitors relative to the single agents. Taken together, these data suggest that combination therapies targeting Mer kinase and FGFR may be effective for treatment of NSCLC and indicate biochemical mechanisms by which the combination therapy may mediate increased anti-tumor activity. Citation Format: Timothy P. Newton, Christopher T. Cummings, Gregory D. Kirkpatrick, Trista K. Hinz, Deborah DeRyckere, Weihe Zhang, Xiaodong Wang, Stephen Frye, H. Shelton Earp, Lynn Heasley, Douglas K. Graham. A novel Mer tyrosine kinase inhibitor mediates increased cell killing in combination with FGFR inhibition. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 1736. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-1736

The targeting of oncogenic 'driver' kinases with small molecule inhibitors has proven to be a highly effective therapeutic strategy in selected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, acquired resistance to targeted therapies invariably arises and is a major limitation to patient care. ROS1 fusion proteins are a recently described class of oncogenic driver, and NSCLC patients that express these fusions generally respond well to ROS1-targeted therapy. In this study, we sought to determine mechanisms of acquired resistance to ROS1 inhibition. To accomplish this, we analyzed tumor samples from a patient who initially responded to the ROS1 inhibitor crizotinib but eventually developed acquired resistance. In addition, we generated a ROS1 inhibition-resistant derivative of the initially sensitive NSCLC cell line HCC78. Previously described mechanisms of acquired resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors including target kinase-domain mutation, target copy number gain, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and conversion to small cell lung cancer histology were found to not underlie resistance in the patient sample or resistant cell line. However, we did observe a switch in the control of growth and survival signaling pathways from ROS1 to EGFR in the resistant cell line. As a result of this switch, ROS1 inhibition-resistant HCC78 cells became sensitive to EGFR inhibition, an effect that was enhanced by co-treatment with a ROS1 inhibitor. Our results suggest that co-inhibition of ROS1 and EGFR may be an effective strategy to combat resistance to targeted therapy in some ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC patients.

Despite initial and often dramatic responses of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-addicted lung tumors to the EGFR-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), gefitinib and erlotinib, nearly all develop resistance and relapse. To explore novel mechanisms mediating acquired resistance, we employed non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines bearing activating mutations in EGFR and rendered them resistant to EGFR-specific TKIs through chronic adaptation in tissue culture. In addition to previously observed resistance mechanisms including EGFR-T790M ‘gate-keeper' mutations and MET amplification, a subset of the seven chronically adapted NSCLC cell lines including HCC4006, HCC2279 and H1650 cells exhibited marked induction of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 2 and FGF receptor 1 (FGFR1) mRNA and protein. Also, adaptation to EGFR-specific TKIs was accompanied by an epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) as assessed by changes in CDH1, VIM, ZEB1 and ZEB2 expression and altered growth properties in Matrigel. In adapted cell lines exhibiting increased FGF2 and FGFR1 expression, measures of growth and signaling, but not EMT, were blocked by FGFR-specific TKIs, an FGF-ligand trap and FGFR1 silencing with RNAi. In parental HCC4006 cells, cell growth was strongly inhibited by gefitinib, although drug-resistant clones progress within 10 days. Combined treatment with gefitinib and AZD4547, an FGFR-specific TKI, prevented the outgrowth of drug-resistant clones. Thus, induction of FGF2 and FGFR1 following chronic adaptation to EGFR-specific TKIs provides a novel autocrine receptor tyrosine kinase-driven bypass pathway in a subset of lung cancer cell lines that are initially sensitive to EGFR-specific TKIs. The findings support FGFR-specific TKIs as potentially valuable additions to existing targeted therapeutic strategies with EGFR-specific TKIs to prevent or delay acquired resistance in EGFR-driven NSCLC.