Search

Purpose: Recently, children with trisomy 18 have been receiving more active treatment for malignancies. We report herein seven cases complete resection was achieved, and discuss multidisciplinary treatment for hepatoblastoma in patients with trisomy 18., Method: The medical records of children with trisomy 18 who were treated at the study center between 2010 and 2023 were reviewed., Result: Six of 69 patients had hepatoblastoma development, and three of these underwent multidisciplinary treatment. In addition, 6 patients had been referred by another hospital for treatment, and four of these underwent multidisciplinary treatment. Among the seven patients who underwent multidisciplinary treatment, three, two, and two were categorized in Pre-treatment Extent of Disease (PRETEXT) classification group I, II, and III, respectively. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy resulting in tumor reduction was performed in three cases. In all the cases, complete resection was achieved with pathologically safe margins. Perioperative complications included circulatory failure in one case and bile leakage in two cases. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered in four cases. The postoperative observation period ranged from 3 months to 11 years, and all the patients are recurrence-free., Conclusion: Children with trisomy 18 complicated with hepatoblastoma whose cardiopulmonary conditions are stable may be good candidates for chemotherapy and surgery., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction (dPCR) presents a promising approach for quantifying DNA and analyzing copy number variants, particularly in non-invasive prenatal testing. This method offers a streamlined and time-efficient procedure in contrast to the widely used next-generation sequencing for non-invasive prenatal testing. Studies have reported encouraging results for dPCR in detecting fetal autosomal aneuploidies. Consequently, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of dPCR in screening for trisomy 21, 18, and 13., Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Sciences, and Embase for relevant articles published up to December 30, 2023. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was utilized for the quality assessment of the included articles. Furthermore, a bivariate random-effect regression model was used to conduct a meta-analysis on the utility of dPCR for trisomy 21 screening., Results: A total of 9 articles were included in this review, with all of them assessing the utility of dPCR in trisomy 21 screening, and 2 and 1 studies conducting additional analysis on the screening abilities of dPCR for trisomy 18 and 13, respectively. A bivariate random-effects model calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Meta-analysis of 6 studies comparing trisomy-21 screening with karyotyping demonstrated dPCR's pooled sensitivity of 98% [95% CI: 94 -100] and specificity of 99% [95% CI: 99 -100]. While conducting a meta-analysis for trisomy 13 and 18 proved impractical, reported values for sensitivity and specificity were favorable., Conclusions: These findings suggest that dPCR holds promise as an effective tool for non-invasive prenatal testing, presenting a less time-consuming and intricate alternative to next-generation sequencing. However, further research is necessary to evaluate dPCR's applicability in clinical settings and to delineate its specific advantages over next-generation sequencing. This study contributes valuable insights into the potential of dPCR for enhancing prenatal screening methodologies., Trial Registration: The protocol of this study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 7/3/2024, with a registration code of CRD42024517523., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

I present a patient with trisomy 18 associated with neuroblastoma. To the best of my knowledge, this is the second report of such an individual in the relevant literature. A 19-month-old girl known to have trisomy 18 presented with respiratory distress secondary to pleural effusion. Work-up showed metastatic neuroblastoma to multiple sites, and the patient's clinical situation was critical. The physician-parent's decision was not to proceed with treatment of the malignancy. Based on this report, I recommend that physicians remain vigilant and have a high level of suspicion about the potential association between neuroblastoma and trisomy 18. Accordingly, it may be necessary to consider performing serial abdominal ultrasounds and biochemical tests to screen children with trisomy 18 who survive beyond infancy., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objective: To verify the prevalence and perform the clinical characterization of oral clefts in a sample of patients with trisomy of chromosome 18 in Southern Brazil., Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study, performed in a reference clinical genetic service in Southern Brazil. The initial sample consisted of 77 patients diagnosed in the neonatal period with trisomy 18 treated at the Clinical Genetics Service of a referral hospital at Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre (UFCSPA). The patients' diagnosis was confirmed by karyotype and care was provided during their stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) of the hospital that is a reference in Southern Brazil for care for malformed patients. The period covered was from 1975 to 2020., Results: During the study period, 77 patients diagnosed with trisomy 18 were treated, most of them in the ICU. Of these, 13 individuals were excluded due to incomplete data. The final sample consisted of 64 patients with an average age of 2.4 years of life, ranging from one day to 16 years old, the majority of whom were female. Regarding face dysmorphisms identified in the sample, three (4,68%) patients had cleft lip and two (3,11%) had cleft lip and palate., Conclusions: This study contributed to the recognition of the characteristics and prevalence of oral clefts in individuals with trisomy 18 in a sample of patients from Southern Brazil. In addition, we described the clinical alterations found in patients with oral clefts, as well as other associated comorbidities, such as cardiac, neurological and pulmonary comorbidities, as well as cranial and facial dysmorphisms.

Objective: In singleton pregnancies, the use of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis as a screening test for common fetal trisomies has spread worldwide though we still lack sufficient data for its use in triplet pregnancies. The objective of this study is to assess the performance of cfDNA testing in detecting fetal aneuploidies in triplet pregnancies as a first-tier test., Method: We performed a retrospective cohort study including data from pregnant women with a triplet pregnancy who underwent cfDNA testing between May 1, 2017, and January 15, 2020. cfDNA was obtained by massive parallel sequencing (VeriSeq NIPT solution; Illumina®). The objectives of the study were to assess the diagnostic performance of cfDNA testing for trisomy 21 (T21) (primary outcome), trisomy 18 (T18) and 13 (secondary outcomes)., Results: During the study period, cfDNA testing was performed in 255 women with triplet pregnancy, of which 165 (64.7%) had a neonatal outcome available. Three tests were positive for T21, one of which was confirmed by an antenatal karyotype, and the other was confirmed at birth. The third case did not undergo an invasive procedure and was not confirmed at birth (false positive). In one case, cfDNA testing was positive for T18 and was confirmed by an antenatal karyotype. There were no cases of trisomy 13 in the cohort. The no-call rate was 2.4% at first sampling. Fifty-eight (22.7%) women had embryo reduction, which in 40 (69%) of whom was performed after the cfDNA test result., Conclusion: cfDNA testing could be offered as primary screening for main fetal aneuploidies in triplet pregnancies after provision of appropriate patient information., (© 2024 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Trisomy 18 is a common chromosomal aberration syndrome, characterized by variable clinical manifestations, including cardiovascular, pulmonary, genitourinary, and musculoskeletal findings, leading to a shorter survival and severe developmental delay in survivors. However, recently, intensive therapeutic intervention has allowed for prolonging survival. In terms of otological complications, only a limited number of relevant reports have been published. To demonstrate the characteristic of hearing loss (HL) in children with Trisomy 18, we retrospectively evaluated 22 patients (44 ears) by comprehensive auditory evaluation with the auditory steady-state response (ASSR) test and temporal bone computed tomography (CT). ASSR revealed that 20 patients (91%) had bilateral moderate to profound HL, more frequent and severe than that in Trisomy 21; among 42 ears having HL, 12 ears (29%) had conductive HL, and 26 ears (62%) had mixed HL. CT scans of 38 ears revealed that 34 ears (89%) had an external and middle ear malformation. Hearing aids (HA) were fitted in 17 patients (air and bone-conduction HAs). The threshold hearing with HA was improved in all of them. Accurate otological evaluation using ASSR and CT and intervention by HAs could be a feasible choice for children with Trisomy 18., (© 2023 The Authors. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Aneuploidies, and in particular, trisomies represent the most common genetic aberrations observed in human genetics today. To explore the presence of trisomies in historic and prehistoric populations we screen nearly 10,000 ancient human individuals for the presence of three copies of any of the target autosomes. We find clear genetic evidence for six cases of trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) and one case of trisomy 18 (Edwards syndrome), and all cases are present in infant or perinatal burials. We perform comparative osteological examinations of the skeletal remains and find overlapping skeletal markers, many of which are consistent with these syndromes. Interestingly, three cases of trisomy 21, and the case of trisomy 18 were detected in two contemporaneous sites in early Iron Age Spain (800-400 BCE), potentially suggesting a higher frequency of burials of trisomy carriers in those societies. Notably, the care with which the burials were conducted, and the items found with these individuals indicate that ancient societies likely acknowledged these individuals with trisomy 18 and 21 as members of their communities, from the perspective of burial practice., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Mortality in individuals with trisomy 18 has significantly decreased over the past 20 years, but there is scant literature addressing the prognosis and cause of death in individuals with trisomy 18 and survival past the first year of life (YOL). This study analyzed factors associated with mortality and cause of death in a retrospective cohort of 174 individuals with trisomy 18 and survival past the first YOL, the largest such series to date. Data were collected via retrospective survey of parents of affected individuals. Prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 18; postnatal respiratory distress; maternal age > 35 years; birthweight <2000 g; brain and spinal cord defect(s); atrial and/or ventricular septal defect(s); inability to feed orally without medical assistance; and failure to meet sitting and rolling milestones were associated with mortality in this sample. Cause of death was compared between our cohort of individuals with trisomy 18 and existing literature on those with mortality before the first YOL. Individuals with trisomy 18 with mortality after the first YOL demonstrated a predominance of infectious (n = 10/22) and postoperative (n = 6/22) contributing causes of death, in contrast to the existing literature, which shows a predominance of cardiopulmonary causes of death (e.g., cardiopulmonary arrest, pulmonary hypertension). These findings demonstrate that individuals with trisomy 18 and survival past the first YOL have unique medical needs, but further research is needed to develop clinical guidelines for this growing population., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objective: To explore the cause of inconsistency between the results of trisomy 7 by expanded non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT-PLUS) and trisomy 18 by prenatal diagnosis., Methods: A pregnant woman who received genetic counseling at Jiaozuo Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital on July 5, 2020 was selected as the study subject. NIPT-PLUS, systematic ultrasound and interventional prenatal testing were carried out. The middle segment and root of umbilical cord, center and edge of the maternal and fatal surface of the placenta were sampled for the validation by copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq)., Results: The result of NIPT-PLUS indicated that the fetus has trisomy 7. Systematic ultrasound has shown multiple malformations including atrioventricular septal defect, horseshoe kidney, and rocker-bottom feet. However, QF-PCR, chromosomal karyotyping analysis, and CNV-seq of amniotic fluid samples all showed that the fetus was trisomy 18. Validation using multiple placental samples confirmed that the middle segment of the umbilical cord contains trisomy 18, the center of the placenta contained trisomy 7, and other placental sites were mosaicism for trisomy 7 and trisomy 18. Notably, the ratio of trisomy 18 became lower further away from the umbilical cord., Conclusion: The false positive results of trisomy 7 and false negative trisomy 18 by NIPT-PLUS was probably due to the existence of placental mosaicism. Strict prenatal diagnosis is required needed aneuploidy is detected by NIPT-PLUS to exclude the influence of placental mosaicisms.

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for the screening of fetal chromosome aneuploidies in twin pregnancies., Methods: A total of 2 745 women with twin-pregnancies were subjected for NIPT screening. Chromosomal karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) were carried out on amniotic fluid samples from those with a high risk for fetal chromosome aneuploidies, and the diagnosis and pregnancy outcome were followed up. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and false positive rate of the NIPT were calculated., Results: Compared with other chromosomal abnormalities, NIPT had a higher efficacy for trisomy 21 and sex chromosomal aneuploidy (SCA) in twin pregnancies (with sensitivity being 100%, 100%, and specificity being 99.93%, 99.9%, respectively). It is difficult to evaluate the efficacy for trisomies 18 and 13 due to the limited data. For chromosome microdeletions and microduplications spanning 15 ~ 21 Mb, NIPT also had a certain detection rate. Compared with women with natural conception, NIPT had a higher detection rate for those with twin pregnancies by assisted reproduction (P < 0.05)., Conclusion: It is feasible to use NIPT for the detection of chromosome aneuploidies in women with twin pregnancies.

Objective: To analyze the results of prenatal diagnosis and outcome of pregnancy for women with a high risk for fetal aneuploidies., Methods: A total of 747 cases of prenatal diagnosis by amniocentesis due to high risks by non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) were selected from January 2015 to March 2022 in the Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University Medical School. The amniotic fluid samples were subjected to chromosomal karyotyping and/or chromosomal microarray analysis. All cases were followed up by searching the birth information or telephone calls, and the results were recorded. 2 test or F test were used for comparing the difference between the groups., Results: Among the 747 pregnant women with a high risk by NIPT, 387 were true positives, and the overall positive predictive value (PPV) was 51.81%. The PPVs for trisomy 21 (T21), trisomy 18 (T18), trisomy 13 (T13) and sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCA) were 80.24% (199/248), 60% (48/80), 14% (7/50) and 38.97% (106/272), respectively. The PPV for T21 was significantly higher than T18 and T13 (χ 2 = 85.216, P < 0.0001). The PPV for other chromosomal aneuploidies and copy number variations (CNVs) were 11.11% (5/45) and 40.74% (22/52), respectively. The PPV for increased X chromosomes was significantly higher than X chromosome decreases (64.29% vs. 22.22%, χ 2 = 5.530, P < 0.05). The overall PPV for elder women (≥ 35 years old) was significantly higher than younger women (69.35% vs. 42.39%, χ 2 = 49.440, P < 0.0001). For T21 and T18, the PPV of Z ≥ 10 group was significantly higher than that for 3 ≤ Z < 5 group or 5 ≤ Z < 10 group (P < 0.05). Among 52 cases with a high risk for CNVs, the PPV for the ≤ 5 Mb group was significantly higher than the 5 Mb < CNVs < 10 Mb or > 10 Mb groups (60% vs. 30%60% vs. 23.53%, P < 0.05). Among the 387 true positive cases, 322 had opted for induced labor, 53 had delivered with no abnormal growth and development, and 12 were lost during the follow-up., Conclusion: The PPVs for common chromosomal aneuploidies are related to the age and Z value of the pregnant women, which were higher in the elder group and higher Z value group. In addition, the PPV is associated with high risk types. The PPV for T21 was higher than T18 and T13, and that for 45,X was lower than 47,XXX, 47,XYY or 47,XXY syndrome. NIPT therefore has relatively high PPVs for the identification of chromosomal CNVs.

Trisomy 18 is the second most common aneuploidy after trisomy 21. It presents with varying degrees of heterogeneous clinical phenotypes involving multiple organ systems, with a high mortality rate. Clinical assessment of fetal trisomy 18 is always challenging. In this study, we describe the phenotypes of the fetuses with trisomy 18 from a perinatal cohort. We reviewed fetuses with trisomy 18 in referrals for perinatal autopsy over the period of 15 years. A detailed phenotyping of the fetuses with trisomy 18 was executed by perinatal autopsy. Appropriate fetal tissues were obtained to perform genomic testing. We observed trisomy 18 in 16 fetuses (2%) in our cohort of 784 fetal/neonatal losses and a perinatal autopsy was performed on all of them. Abnormal facial profile was the most frequent anomaly (10/16, 62%) followed by anomalies of the extremities (9/16, 56%), and cardiac defects (6/16, 37%). We also observed esophageal atresia, diaphragmatic hernia, and neural tube defect. The study represents one of the largest cohorts of trisomy 18 from a perinatal center from a developing country and highlights the clinical heterogeneity attributed to trisomy 18. We also report a recurrence of trisomy 18 in a family., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Trisomy 18 syndrome, also known as Edwards syndrome, is a chromosomal trisomy. The syndrome has historically been considered lethal owing to its poor prognosis, and palliative care was primarily indicated for trisomy 18 neonates. Although there have been several reports on the improvement of survival outcomes in infants with trisomy 18 syndrome through neonatal intensive care, few studies have compared the impact of neonatal intensive care on survival outcomes with that of non-intensive care. Therefore, we compared the survival-related outcomes of neonates with trisomy 18 between intensive and non-intensive care., Methods: Seventeen infants of trisomy 18 admitted to our center between 2007 and 2019 were retrospectively studied. We divided the patients into a non-intensive group ( n = 5) and an intensive group ( n = 12) and evaluated their perinatal background and survival-related outcomes of the two groups., Results: The 1- and 3-year survival rates were both 33% in the intensive group, which was significantly higher than that in the non-intensive group ( p < 0.001). Half of the infants in the intensive care group were discharged alive, whereas in the non-intensive care group, all died during hospitalization ( p = 0.049)., Conclusions: Neonatal intensive care for neonates with 18 trisomy significantly improved not only survival rates but also survival-discharge rates. Our findings would be helpful in providing 18 trisomy neonates with standard neonatal intensive care when discussing medical care with their parents., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (© 2023 Koshida and Takahashi.)

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of expanded noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT-Plus) for the detection of aneuploidies and microdeletion/microduplication syndromes., Methods: A total of 7177 pregnant women were enrolled in the study from June 2020 to March 2022 at Xijing Hospital, China. Cases with NIPT-Plus-positive results were further confirmed by chromosomal karyotyping and a chromosomal microarray analysis., Results: A total of 112 positive cases (1.56%) were identified by NIPT-Plus, including 60 chromosome aneuploidies and 52 microdeletion/microduplication syndromes. Ninety-five cases were validated by amniocentesis, and 57 were confirmed with true-positive results, comprising 18 trisomy 21, 4 trisomy 18, 1 trisomy 13, 17 sex chromosome aneuploidies, 1 other aneuploidy, and 16 microdeletion/microduplication syndromes. The positive predictive value of total chromosomal abnormalities was 60% (57/95). For trisomy 21, trisomy 18, trisomy 13, sex chromosome aneuploidies, other aneuploidies and microdeletion/microduplication syndromes, the sensitivity was all 100%, the specificity was 100, 99.986, 100, 99.888, 99.958, and 99.636%, and the positive predictive value was 100, 80, 100, 68, 25, and 38.10%, respectively. For all clinical characteristics, the abnormal maternal serum screening group was found to have the highest prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities (1.54%), and the ultrasound abnormality group presented the highest positive predictive value (73.33%)., Conclusions: NIPT-Plus has great potential for the detection of aneuploidies and microdeletion/microduplication syndromes owing to its high sensitivity, safety, and specificity, which greatly reduces unnecessary invasive procedures and the risk of miscarriage and allows informed maternal choice., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Trisomy 18 is associated with several congenital malformations, including horseshoe kidney. It can be full, partial, or mosaic, and mosaicism is often associated with lesser severity and longer life expectancy, placing patients at greater risk of developing neoplasms or malignancies. One common tumor among children with Trisomy 18 is Wilms tumor, which is also associated with renal congenital abnormalities such as horseshoe kidney. We present a case describing the occurrence of these three characteristics: development of Wilms tumor in a patient with Trisomy 18 and a horseshoe kidney and discuss treatment with regards to these conditions., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess the value of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for trisomy 21 (T21), trisomy 18 (T18), trisomy 13 (T13), sex chromosome aneuploidies, chromosomal microdeletions and microduplications using cell-free fetal DNA from peripheral blood samples of pregnant women., Methods: A total of 15 237 pregnant women who had undergone NIPT testing at the Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Zaozhuang from February 2015 to December 2021 were enrolled in this study. For those with a high risk by NIPT, amniotic fluid samples were collected for G-banding chromosomal karyotyping analysis and chromosomal microarray analysis to verify the consistency of NIPT with results of prenatal diagnosis. All of the women were followed up by telephone for pregnancy outcomes., Results: Among the 15 237 pregnant women, 266 (1.75%) were detected with a high risk for fetal chromosomal abnormality were detected. Among these, 79 (29.7%) were at a high risk for T21, 26 (9.77%) were at a high risk for T18, 9 (3.38%) were at a high risk for T13, 74 (27.82%) were at a high risk for sex chromosome aneuploidies, 12 (4.51%) were at a high risk for other autosomal aneuploidies, and 66 (24.81%) were at a high risk for chromosomal microdeletions or microduplications. 217 women had accepted invasive prenatal diagnosis and respectively 50, 13, 1, 25, 1 and 18 were confirmed with T21, T18, T13, sex chromosome aneuploidies, autosomal aneuploidies and microdeletions/microduplications, and the positive predictive values were 75.76%, 68.42%, 11.11%, 40.32%, 10% and 35.29%, respectively. For 13 042 women (85.59%), the outcome of pregnancy were successfully followed up. During the follow-up, one false negative case of T21 was discovered. No false positive cases for T13 and T18 were found., Conclusion: NIPT has a sound performance for screening T13, T18 and T21, and is also valuable for screening other autosomal aneuploidies, sex chromosome aneuploidies and chromosomal microdeletions/microduplications.

Background: Cell-free fetal DNA screening is routinely offered to pregnant individuals to screen for aneuploidies. Although cell-free DNA screening is consistently more accurate than multiple-marker screening, it sometimes fails to yield a result. These test failures and their clinical implications are poorly described in the literature. Some studies suggest that a failed cell-free DNA screening result is associated with increased likelihood of cytogenetic abnormalities., Objective: This study aimed to assess the association between a failed cell-free DNA test and common aneuploidies. The objectives were to determine: (1) the proportion of test failures on first and subsequent attempts, and (2) whether a failed cell-free DNA screen on first attempt is associated with increased likelihood of common aneuploidies (trisomies 21, 18, and 13, and sex chromosome aneuploidies)., Study Design: This was a population-based retrospective cohort study using data from Ontario's prescribed maternal and child registry, Better Outcomes Registry and Network Ontario. The study included all singleton pregnancies in Ontario with an estimated date of delivery from September 1, 2016 to March 31, 2019 that had a cell-free DNA screening record in the registry. Specific outcomes (trisomies 21, 18, and 13, and sex chromosome aneuploidies) of pregnancies with a failed cell-free DNA screen on first attempt were compared with those of pregnancies with low-risk cell-free DNA-screening results using modified Poisson regression adjusted for funding status (publicly funded vs self-paid), gestational age at screening, method of conception, and maternal age for autosomal aneuploidies., Results: Our cohort included 35,146 pregnancies that had cell-free DNA screening during the study period. The overall cell-free DNA screening failure rate was 4.8% on first attempt and 2.2% after multiple attempts. An abnormal cytogenetic result for trisomies 21, 18, and 13, or sex chromosome aneuploidies was identified in 19.4% of pregnancies with a failed cell-free DNA screening for which cytogenetic testing was performed. Pregnancies with a failed cell-free DNA screen on first attempt had a relative risk of 130.3 (95% confidence interval, 64.7-262.6) for trisomy 21, trisomy 18, or trisomy 13, and a risk difference of 5.4% (95% confidence interval, 2.6-8.3), compared with pregnancies with a low-risk result. The risk of sex chromosome aneuploidies was not significantly greater in pregnancies with a failed result compared with pregnancies with a low-risk result (relative risk, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-7.9; relative difference, 1.2%; 95% confidence interval, -0.9 to 3.2)., Conclusion: Cell-free DNA screening test failures are relatively common. Although repeated testing improves the likelihood of an informative result, pregnancies with a failed cell-free DNA screen upon first attempt remain at increased risk for common autosomal aneuploidies, but not sex chromosome aneuploidies., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Trisomy 18 is a constitutional chromosomal disorder defined by the presence of a supernumerary chromosome 18. The diagnosis is suspected clinically and confirmed by cytogenetic analysis. Genetic counseling for patients' families is important. The objective of this study is to report our experience in Medical Genetics Department at the Mohammed VI University Hospital of Oujda in the diagnosis and genetic counseling of trisomy 18 through dysmorphological expertise and cytogenetic analysis., Material and Methods: We report a retrospective descriptive study over a period of four years (2018-2022) of nine patients with polymalformative syndrome suggestive of trisomy 18 who underwent cytogenetic analysis., Results: The median age of patients at diagnosis was 2 days with a male predominance. The mean maternal age at birth of the patients in our series was 40 years. Consanguinity was found in only one patient. All patients had a typical phenotype of trisomy 18. The postnatal constitutional karyotype showed a homogeneous trisomy 18 in all patients. In our series, only one patient is still alive at the age of 7 months, the other 8 patients died with a median postnatal survival of 5 days., Conclusion: We underline through this study, the contribution of the medical geneticist in the clinic and cytogenetic diagnostic approach of rare chromosomal affections, in order to provide an adequate genetic counseling to the families.

Objective: To investigate the survival to 10 years of age of children with trisomy 13 (T13) and children with trisomy 18 (T18), born 1995-2014., Design: Population-based cohort study that linked mortality data to data on children born with T13 or T18, including translocations and mosaicisms, from 13 member registries of EUROCAT, a European network for the surveillance of congenital anomalies., Setting: 13 regions in nine Western European countries., Patients: 252 live births with T13 and 602 with T18., Main Outcome Measures: Survival at 1 week, 4 weeks and 1, 5 and 10 years of age estimated by random-effects meta-analyses of registry-specific Kaplan-Meier survival estimates., Results: Survival estimates of children with T13 were 34% (95% CI 26% to 46%), 17% (95% CI 11% to 29%) and 11% (95% CI 6% to 18%) at 4 weeks, 1 and 10 years, respectively. The corresponding survival estimates were 38% (95% CI 31% to 45%), 13% (95% CI 10% to 17%) and 8% (95% CI 5% to 13%) for children with T18. The 10-year survival conditional on surviving to 4 weeks was 32% (95% CI 23% to 41%) and 21% (95% CI 15% to 28%) for children with T13 and T18, respectively., Conclusions: This multi-registry European study found that despite extremely high neonatal mortality in children with T13 and T18, 32% and 21%, respectively, of those who survived to 4 weeks were likely to survive to age 10 years. These reliable survival estimates are useful to inform counselling of parents after prenatal diagnosis., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: To analyze the result of prenatal diagnosis and outcome of pregnancy for fetuses with rare autosomal trisomies (RATs) suggested by non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)., Methods: A total of 69 608 pregnant women who underwent NIPT at Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2016 to December 2020 were selected as study subjects. The result of prenatal diagnosis and outcome of pregnancy for those with a high risk for RATs were retrospectively analyzed., Results: Among the 69 608 pregnant women, the positive rate of NIPT for high-risk RATs was 0.23% (161/69 608), with trisomy 7 (17.4%, 28/161) and trisomy 8 (12.4%, 20/161) being the most common, and trisomy 17 (0.6%, 1/161) being the rarest. For 98 women who had accepted invasive prenatal diagnosis, 12 fetal chromosomal abnormalities were confirmed, and in 5 cases the results were consistent with those of NIPT, which yielded a positive predictive value of 5.26%. Among the 161 women with a high risk for RATs, 153 (95%) were successfully followed up. 139 fetuses were ultimately born, with only one being clinically abnormal., Conclusion: Most women with a high risk for RATs by NIPT have good pregnancy outcomes. Invasive prenatal diagnosis or serial ultrasonography to monitor fetal growth, instead of direct termination of pregnancy, is recommended.

Background: Omphalocele is associated with many aneuploidies, deletions and congenital anomalies. This study evaluates pregnancies diagnosed with omphalocele and its relevance to concomitant genetic disorders., Methods: The data of patients with the intrauterine diagnosis of omphalocele who had invasive diagnostic testing performed between January 2017 and January 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. The traditional karyotype analysis was performed to prenatal diagnosis for all fetuses. During the study period, all patients were scanned via ultrasonography by an experienced perinatologist, prenatally., Results: We evaluated 22 cases of omphalocele whose genetic testing results were available. The mean maternal age was 25 (18-41) years. The median gestational week at diagnosis was 13 (11-22). Invasive genetic testing revealed aneuploidy in 7 patients (31.8%), 2 with trisomy 13 (9.1%), and 5 with trisomy 18 (22.8%). There were 5 fetuses (22.7%) that had extracorporeal liver: 1 had trisomy 18 (20%), 1 had trisomy 13 (20%), and the other 3 fetuses had a normal karyotype (60%). Further, 14 (63.6%) pregnancies were terminated: 4 had trisomy 18 (28.6%), 1 had trisomy 13 (7.1%), and 9 of the terminated pregnancies (64.3%) had additional congenital anomalies. There were 4 infants who died (50%) born from 8 patients who decided to continue with their pregnancy. The omphalocele sac of 1 infant spontaneously regressed in the ensuing weeks of pregnancy who is now 1 year old., Conclusions: The chromosomal abnormalities presented in up to 31.8% of cases diagnosed with omphalocele. Moreover, for cases with normal genetic testing results, the propensity for additional structural defects was high and the prognosis remains poor. Counseling parents to consider their option of terminating the pregnancy is appropriate.

Objective: To assess the clinical efficacy and health economic value of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for the prenatal screening of common fetal chromosomal aneuploidies., Methods: 10 612 pregnant women from October 2017 to December 2019 presented at the antenatal screening clinic of the General Hospital of Tianjin Medical University were selected as the study subjects. Results of NIPT and invasive prenatal diagnosis and follow-up outcome for the 10 612 pregnant women were retrospectively analyzed and compared. Meanwhile, NIPT data for two periods were analyzed for assessing the health economic value of NIPT as the second- or first-tier screening strategy for the prenatal diagnosis of fetal trisomies 21, 18 and 13., Results: The NIPT was successful in 10 528 (99.72%) subjects, with the sensitivity for fetal trisomies 21, 18 and 13 being 100%, 92.86% and 100%, and the positive predictive value (PPV) being 89.74%, 61.90% and 44.44%, respectively. The PPV of NIPT for sex chromosome aneuploidies was 34.21%. Except for one false negative case of trisomy 18, the negative predictive value for trisomy 21, trisomy 13 and other chromosomal abnormalities were 100%. For pregnant women with high risk by serological screening, advanced maternal age or abnormal ultrasound soft markers, NIPT has yielded a significantly increased high risk ratio. There was no statistical difference in the PPV of NIPT among pregnant women from each subgroup. NIPT would have higher health economic value as a second-tier screening until 2019, while compared to 2015 ~ 2017, its incremental cost-effectiveness ratio as a first-tier screening had declined clearly., Conclusion: The screening efficacy of NIPT for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 for a mixed population is significantly better than conventional serological screening, but it is relatively low for sex chromosomal abnormalities. NIPT can also be recommended for populations with relatively high risks along with detailed pre- and post-test genetic counselling. From the perspective of health economics, except for open neural tube defects, it is possible for NIPT to replace the conventional serological screening in the future as its cost continues to decrease.

Introduction: Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS) is a useful screening method for common aneuploidies that can occur in pregnancies. It yields high sensitivities and specificities for the targeted conditions it tests for. Most commonly, these include Trisomies in chromosomes 21, 18, and 13, as well as aneuploidies in chromosomes X and Y. It does not, however, replace diagnostic testing. We review four cases seen by our institutions of patients who had NIPS performed with low-risk results and subsequently had fetuses affected with trisomy 18., Methods: All fetal samples were evaluated by level II anatomic ultrasound and tested on amniocytes or products of conception through karyotype or chromosomal microarray following low-risk NIPS., Results: None of the fetuses showed evidence of mosaicism and had features (both on ultrasound and postnatally) consistent with Trisomy 18. Postnatal fluorescence in situ hybridization performed on Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded tissue from 3 of the affected pregnancies' placentas identified mosaicism of trisomy 18., Discussion: We discuss the possible explanations for the discrepancy between NIPS results and fetal karyotype, including, but not limited to placental mosaicism, placental size, and limitations of NIPS as a screening test., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: Twins account for approximately 1 in 30 live births in the United States. However, there are limited clinical experience studies published in noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for detecting aneuploidies in twins. This study reports the performance of an SNP-based NIPT in the largest cohort with known outcomes for high-risk aneuploidy results., Method: This is a retrospective analysis of 18,984 results from commercial single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based NIPT tests performed in twins between October 2, 2017 and December 31, 2019. Follow-up for all 211 high-risk cases was solicited., Results: Follow-up outcomes were obtained in 105 cases. Positive predictive values (PPVs) for high-risk results were 88.7% (63/71, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 79.0%-95.0%) for trisomy 21% and 72.7% (8/11, 95% CI: 39.0%-94.0%) for trisomy 18. The results were stratified into monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ). The PPVs in MZ were 100% for both trisomy 21 (4/4, 95% CI: 40%-100%) and trisomy 18 (1/1, 95% CI: 2.5%-100%). No trisomy 13 cases were detected in the MZ group. The PPVs in DZ were 88.1% (59/67, 95% CI: 77.8%-94.7%), 70.0% (7/10, 95% CI: 34.8%-93.3%), and 66.7% (2/3, 95% CI: 9.4%-99.2%) for trisomy 21, trisomy 18, and trisomy 13, respectively., Conclusion: The performance of SNP-based NIPT in this large twin cohort was comparable to previously reported twin NIPT studies. SNP-based NIPT allows for zygosity-based PPV assessment., (© 2022 Natera. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

A vanishing twin (VT) occurs in up to 30% of early diagnosed twin pregnancies and is associated with an increased risk of fetal aneuploidy. Here, we describe our experience in a large VT population of 847 patients that underwent noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for common fetal trisomies over a three-year period. All patients underwent an ultrasound examination prior to NIPT. Two comparison populations were included, namely, the singleton ( n = 105,560) and the viable multiple gestation pregnancy samples ( n = 9691) collected over the same period. All NIPT samples in the VT population received a result, of which 14 were high-risk for trisomy 21 (1.6%), nine for trisomy 18 (1.1%), and six for trisomy 13 (0.7%). Diagnostic testing confirmed the presence of trisomy 21 in 6/12 samples, giving a positive predictive value of 50%. One trisomy 18 case and no trisomy 13 cases were confirmed. The time between fetal demise and NIPT sampling did not appear to affect the number of true- or false-positive cases. In conclusion, NIPT is an effective screening method for trisomy 21 in the surviving fetus(es) in VT pregnancies. For trisomies 18 and 13, a positive NIPT should be interpreted carefully and ultrasound monitoring is preferrable over invasive diagnostic testing.

Background: To evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) according to the results of NIPT and pregnancy outcomes with different indications., Methods: Between October 2014 and December 2020, 20,626 pregnant women who received NIPT were included in this study. The positive predictive value (PPV) of trisomy 21, 18, and 13 (T21, T18, T13), sex chromosome abnormalities (SCAs), other chromosomal aneuploidies, and chromosomal microdeletion/microduplication were calculated. The positive results of NIPT were confirmed by amniocentesis, Karyotype analysis, and chromosome microarray analysis (CMA)., Results: In total, 263 positive cases (263/20,626, 1.28%) were detected by NIPT, of which T21, T18, and T13 were 69, 26, and 9 cases, respectively. Sex chromosome abnormalities (SCAs), other chromosomal aneuploidies, and copy number variants (CNVs) were 69, 12, and 38 cases, respectively. There were true positive in 49 of T21, 13 of T18, 1 of T13, 32 of SCAs, 1 of other chromosomal aneuploidies, and 15 of CNVs. The NIPT sensitivity of T21, T18, T13, SCAs, other chromosomal aneuploidies, and CNVs was all 100%, the specialty was 99.90%, 99.94%, 99.96%, 99.82%, 99.95%, 99.89%, and the PPV was 71.01%, 50.00%, 11.11%, 46.38%, 8.33%, 39.47%, respectively. The PPV was high in T21, moderate in T18 and SCAs, and low in T13 and other chromosomal abnormalities., Conclusion: NIPT has high accuracy, specificity and and can effectively avoid the occurrence of birth defects, but it cannot replace prenatal diagnosis. The accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of NIPT in detecting sex chromosomes, chromosome microdeletion/microduplication, and other chromosomal abnormalities should be improved., (© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objective: To investigate the influence of Z -score and different risk factors on positive predictive value (PPV) of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for chromosome aneuploidies. Methods: A total of 81 838 NIPT samples from January 1, 2016 to May 31, 2021 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were retrospectively analyzed. Invasive prenatal diagnosis was applied to verify the diagnosis of NIPT-positive results and the corresponding PPV was calculated. The PPV of the samples with different Z -score were compared. The women were divided into high-risk group and non-high-risk group: high-risk group ( n =39 114) included those with ultrasound soft index abnormalities, advanced maternal age or high risk for maternal serum screening, while non-high-risk group ( n =42 724) included those with intermediate risk for maternal serum screening or no indications. The differences of the PPV between these two groups were compared. Finally, the comprehensive influence of Z -score and different risk factors on PPV were analyzed. Results: A total of 471 high-risk cases were detected by NIPT results, including 362 cases of trisomy 21, 77 cases of trisomy 18 and 32 cases of trisomy 13. For trisomy 21, trisomy 18 and trisomy 13, there were 226 cases, 46 cases and 6 cases which were confirmed via invasive prenatal diagnosis respectively. The corresponding PPV were 79.3% (226/285), 82.1% (46/56) and 27.3% (6/22), respectively. PPV of trisomy 21 and trisomy 18 were positively correlated with the corresponding Z -score ( r =0.92, 0.62, all P <0.05), while trisomy 13 could not be analyzed due to the small sample size. The PPV of high-risk group was 85.2% (207/243), which was higher than that of the non-high-risk group with PPV of 59.2%(71/120, χ 2 =30.30, P <0.01). When the Z -score was between 3-<4 and 4-<5, the PPV of the high-risk group were 46.2%(12/26)and 62.5%(15/24) respectively, which were higher than those of the non-high-risk group [16.0%(4/25) and 14.3%(3/21), χ 2 =4.10, 8.90, all P <0.05]. With the increase of Z -score, there was no significant difference in PPV between the two groups (all P >0.05). Conclusions: The PPV of trisomy 21 and trisomy 18 are positively correlated with Z -score. The PPV of high-risk group is higher than that of non-high-risk group. The combination of Z -score and other risk factors may provide more accurate genetic counseling for those with NIPT positive results.

Background: Cell-free DNA noninvasive prenatal screening for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 has been rapidly adopted into clinical practice. However, previous studies are limited by a lack of follow-up genetic testing to confirm the outcomes and accurately assess test performance, particularly in women at a low risk for aneuploidy., Objective: To measure and compare the performance of cell-free DNA screening for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 between women at a low and high risk for aneuploidy in a large, prospective cohort with genetic confirmation of results STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter prospective observational study at 21 centers in 6 countries. Women who had single-nucleotide-polymorphism-based cell-free DNA screening for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 were enrolled. Genetic confirmation was obtained from prenatal or newborn DNA samples. The test performance and test failure (no-call) rates were assessed for the cohort, and women with low and high previous risks for aneuploidy were compared. An updated cell-free DNA algorithm blinded to the pregnancy outcome was also assessed., Results: A total of 20,194 women were enrolled at a median gestational age of 12.6 weeks (interquartile range, 11.6-13.9). The genetic outcomes were confirmed in 17,851 cases (88.4%): 13,043 (73.1%) low-risk and 4808 (26.9%) high-risk cases for aneuploidy. Overall, 133 trisomies were diagnosed (100 trisomy 21; 18 trisomy 18; 15 trisomy 13). The cell-free DNA screen positive rate was lower in the low-risk vs the high-risk group (0.27% vs 2.2%; P<.0001). The sensitivity and specificity were similar between the groups. The positive predictive value for the low- and high-risk groups was 85.7% vs 97.5%; P=.058 for trisomy 21; 50.0% vs 81.3%; P=.283 for trisomy 18; and 62.5% vs 83.3; P=.58 for trisomy 13, respectively. Overall, 602 (3.4%) patients had no-call result after the first draw and 287 (1.61%) after including cases with a second draw. The trisomy rate was higher in the 287 cases with no-call results than patients with a result on a first draw (2.8% vs 0.7%; P=.001). The updated algorithm showed similar sensitivity and specificity to the study algorithm with a lower no-call rate., Conclusion: In women at a low risk for aneuploidy, single-nucleotide-polymorphism-based cell-free DNA has high sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive value of 85.7% for trisomy 21 and 74.3% for the 3 common trisomies. Patients who receive a no-call result are at an increased risk of aneuploidy and require additional investigation., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) using cell-free DNA has been assimilated into prenatal care. Prior studies examined clinical validity and technical performance in high-risk populations. This systematic evidence review evaluates NIPS performance in a general-risk population., Methods: Medline (PubMed) and Embase were used to identify studies examining detection of Down syndrome (T21), trisomy 18 (T18), trisomy 13 (T13), sex chromosome aneuploidies, rare autosomal trisomies, copy number variants, and maternal conditions, as well as studies assessing the psychological impact of NIPS and the rate of subsequent diagnostic testing. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to calculate pooled estimates of NIPS performance (P < .05). Heterogeneity was investigated through subgroup analyses. Risk of bias was assessed., Results: A total of 87 studies met inclusion criteria. Diagnostic odds ratios were significant (P < .0001) for T21, T18, and T13 for singleton and twin pregnancies. NIPS was accurate (≥99.78%) in detecting sex chromosome aneuploidies. Performance for rare autosomal trisomies and copy number variants was variable. Use of NIPS reduced diagnostic tests by 31% to 79%. Conclusions regarding psychosocial outcomes could not be drawn owing to lack of data. Identification of maternal conditions was rare., Conclusion: NIPS is a highly accurate screening method for T21, T18, and T13 in both singleton and twin pregnancies., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest N.C.R. is a consultant for The Jackson Laboratories and the ObG Project. E.S.B. and M.L.L. serve as directors in, and D.L. is employed by, clinical laboratories that perform a breadth of genetic and genomic analyses on a fee-for-service basis. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To analyze the characteristic of prenatal serological screening in fetus with X-linked ichthyosis (XLI), and to explore the relationship between unconjugated estriol (uE 3 ) levels and XLI. Methods: A total of 56 fetuses with Xp22.31 microdeletion indicated by prenatal diagnosis and 70 fetuses diagnosed with trisomy 21 and 26 fetuses with trisomy 18 in Henan Provincial People's Hospital and Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical College from September 2016 to June 2021 were collected. The multiples of median (MoM) values of uE 3 , alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) during the second trimester of pregnancy were retrospectively analyzed. Prenatal diagnosis was made by amniotic fluid karyotype analysis and genome copy number variant analysis, parent genetic verification and pathogenicity analysis were performed, and maternal and infant outcomes were followed up. Results: Of 56 pregnant women with fetal Xp22.31 microdeletion, 43 underwent serological screening during the second trimester of pregnancy, of which 42 were abnormal (39 male fetuses and 3 female fetuses). The median uE 3 MoM value of 39 male fetuses [0.06 (0.00-0.21)] was lower than the normal value and significantly lower than that of fetuses with trisomy 21 [0.71 (0.26-1.27)] and fetuses with trisomy 18 [0.36 (0.15-0.84)], the difference was statistically significant ( Z =99.96, P <0.001). While the MoM values of AFP and hCG were all within the normal range. Among the 56 fetuses carrying Xp22.31 microdeletion, 45 were male fetuses and 11 were female fetuses, and the deletion fragments all involved STS gene. Eighty-nine percent (50/56) were inherited from mother (49 cases) or father (1 case), and 11% (6/56) were de novo mutations. Follow-up showed 48 live births (38 males and 10 females) and 8 chose to terminate pregnancy (7 males and 1 female). Among the 38 male newborns, 37 presented with scaly skin changes from 1 to 3 months of age, and one had no clinical manifestations until 4 months after birth. Ten female newborns had no obvious clinical manifestations. Conclusions: The decrease levels of uE 3 MoM on maternal serological screening is closely related to the higher risk of XLI in male fetuses. For pregnant women with low uE 3 in serological screening or with family history of ichthyosis, in addition to chromosomal karyotype analysis, joint detection of genomic copy number variant analysis should be recommended.

Abstract: Noninvasive prenatal screening using cell-free DNA involves analysis of a sample of maternal blood for DNA fragments of fetal chromosomes from the fetal-placental unit to detect common chromosome abnormalities, trisomy 21, trisomy 13, trisomy 18, and sex chromosomes as early as 10 weeks' gestation when the fetal fraction is usually more than 4%. It is the most sensitive and specific prenatal screening option for these conditions. Because it is a screening test, false-positive and false-negative results can occur. Positive screen results necessitate further evaluation for diagnosis to confirm a medical condition, before critical decisions regarding pregnancy are made. Professional organizations provide clinical recommendations to providers regarding prescreen and postscreen counseling and management of results., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The author reports no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 American Association of Nurse Practitioners.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The author has no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

The effects of medical and surgical interventions on the survival of patients with trisomy 18 have been reported, leading to changes in perinatal management and decision-making. However, few studies have fully reported the recent changes in survival and treatment of trisomy 18. We examined how treatment and survival of patients with trisomy 18 have changed over a decade in a Japanese pediatric tertiary referral center. This retrospective cohort study included patients with trisomy 18 who were admitted within the first 7 days of life at the Hyogo Prefectural Kobe Children's Hospital between 2008 and 2017. The patients were divided into early period (EP) and late period (LP) groups based on the birth year of 2008-2012 and 2013-2017, respectively. Changes in treatment and survival rates were compared between the two groups. A total of 56 patients were studied (29 in the EP group and 27 in the LP group). One-year survival rates were 34.5% and 59.3% in the EP and LP groups, respectively. The survival to discharge rate significantly increased from 27.6% in the EP group to 81.5% in the LP group (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients receiving surgery, especially for congenital heart defects, significantly increased from 59% in the EP group to 96% in the LP group (p = 0.001). In our single-center study, survival and survival to discharge were significantly improved in patients with trisomy 18, probably because of increased rate of surgical interventions. These findings may facilitate better decision-making by patients' families and healthcare providers., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objective: To assess the practical and health economical values of non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) in Changsha Municipal Public Welfare Program., Methods: A retrospective analysis was carried out on 149 165 women undergoing NIPT test from April 9, 2018 to December 31, 2019. For pregnant women with high risks, invasive prenatal diagnosis and follow-up of pregnancy outcome were conducted. The cost-benefit of NIPT for Down syndrome was analyzed., Results: NIPT was carried out for 149 165 pregnant women and succeeded in 148 749 cases (99.72%), for which outcome were available in 148 538 (99.86%). 90% of pregnant women from the region accepted the screening with NIPT. 415 (0.27%) were diagnosed as high risk. Among these, 381 (91.81%) accepted amniocentesis, which led to the diagnosis of 212 cases of trisomy 21 (PPV=85.14%), 41 cases with trisomy 18 (PPV=48.81%) and 10 cases with trisomy 13 (PPV=20.83%). The sensitivity and specificity of NIPT for trisomy 21, trisomy 18 and trisomy 13 were (97.70%, 99.98%), (97.62%, 9.97%) and (100%, 99.97%), respectively. In addition, 213 and 30 cases were diagnosed with sex chromosomal aneuploidies (PPV=46.2%) and other autosomal anomalies (PPV=16.57%), respectively. For Down syndrome screening, the cost and benefit of the project was 120.79 million yuan and 1,056.95 million yuan, respectively. The cost-benefit ratio was 1: 8.75, and safety index was 0.0035., Conclusion: NIPT is a highly accurate screening test for trisomy 21, which was followed by trisomy 18 and sex chromosomal aneuploidies, while it was less accurate for other autosomal aneuploidies. The application of NIPT screening has a high health economical value.

Individuals with trisomy 18 (T18) usually have congenital heart disease, often with pulmonary hypertension, which is associated with poor outcomes. This study aimed to explore the characteristics of pulmonary circulation including pulmonary vascular resistance (Rp) and compliance (Cp) among them. We retrospectively reviewed cardiac catheterization data in subjects with T18, trisomy 21 (T21), and without chromosomal anomaly (control group) who were referred due to heart failure associated with ventricular septal defect between 2000 and 2020. Pulmonary hemodynamic parameters including Rp and Cp were compared between these groups. We studied 20 subjects with T18, 88 subjects with T21, and 240 control subjects. There was no significant difference in age (T18: 4.6 [3.0-6. 9] vs. T21: 2.8 [1.9-4.0] vs. control: 2.9 [1.6-3.2] months, p = 0.06) and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (T18: 41 [33-49] vs. T21: 35 [30-41] vs. control: 36 [28-43] mmHg, p = 0.121) between the groups. The pulmonary to systemic blood flow ratio (Qp/Qs) (p = 0.983), Rp (p = 0.449), and Cp (p = 0.195) did not differ between T18 and control groups. However, Qp/Qs and Cp in T18 group were significantly greater than that in T21 group (T18: Qp/Qs: 3.4 [2.3-5.2] vs. T: 21 2.3 [1.7-3.7], p = 0.001. Cp: 3.5 [2.3-5.5] vs. 2.3 [1.6-3.1] mmHg/mL/m 2 , p = 0.007), while Rp was identical between the groups (T18: 2.0 [1.6-3.3] vs. T21: 2.3 [1.7-3.7], p = 0.386). The pulmonary circulation in T18 subjects differed from that observed in T21 subjects, and identical to that observed in control subjects. Pulmonary hypertension is expected to be normalized after reasonable corrective surgery in T18 patients with congenital heart disease., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objective: To analyze the cause and pregnancy outcome for non-reportable cell-free DNA (cfDNA) results during non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)., Methods: cfDNA was extracted from maternal plasma from 5898 singleton pregnancies at 12 to 22 gestational weeks and underwent NIPT with strict quality control standards. For those with sub-standard results, redraw or invasive prenatal procedures were recommended., Results: Among the 5898 cases, 32 have failed for the initial NIPT, including 17 cases with substandard cffDNA%, 10 cases with data fluctuation after twice library constructing and sequencing, and 5 cases with unidentifiable sex chromosome abnormalities. For these 32 cases, 2 directly underwent amniocentesis, and karyotyping analysis showed both were normal. Six of the 30 redrawn cases finally turned out to be nonreportable. The final nonreportable rate was therefore 0.1% (8/5898). Of the redrawn cases, 1 trisomy 21, 1 trisomy 18 and 1 trisomy 13 high risk-cases were identified, which were all confirmed to be false positive. Among the 6 nonreportable cases, 2 women underwent invasive prenatal testing, and 1 was found to have a normal fetal karyotype, while another was found to have an abnormal karyotype of mos45,X[32]/46,XY[18]. The other 4 nonreportable cases who did not accept invasive prenatal testing have all reported normal child development at follow-up., Conclusion: The main reason for nonreportable NIPT results was low cffDNA%. The high success rate of the redrawn cases has effectively increased the overall NIPT success rate and reduced the number of the cases necessitating invasive prenatal diagnosis. The initially nonreportable women may consider retesting after careful counseling with informed consent.