Search

Background: Cancer-related fatigue is a symptom commonly reported in survivors of breast cancer and is the most variable symptom. Besides questionnaires like PIPER to assess cancer-related fatigue, there is a need to objectively measure fatigue., Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the physiological dimension of fatigue based on acceleration during a 30-second maximal sit-to-stand test., Design: This was a cross-sectional study., Methods: Linear acceleration from a smartphone placed on the sternum was recorded in 70 survivors of breast cancer. Fourth-degree polynomial adjustment from the acceleration signal to the vertical and anterior-posterior axis was calculated. The fatigue temporal cut-off point was detected as a change in the curve slope of the first maximum point of acceleration., Results: Women were aged 51.8 (8.9) years with a body mass index of 25.4 (5.1) Kg/m2. They performed 23.6 (6.57) number of repetitions. The mean fatigue cut-off point from the total sample was 10.2 (3.1) seconds., Limitations: Further research should employ time-prolonged tests to study acceleration behavior beyond 30 seconds as well as include a physiological criterion that justifies the nonlinear saturation of the acceleration-based criterion., Conclusions: This study assessed fatigue through a low-cost and easy-to-use methodology during a functional and widely used test such as 30-second maximal sit-to-stand. This would allow clinicians to assess fatigue in a short-effort exercise to individualize exercise prescription dose, measure changes during intervention, and track fatigue objectively throughout survivorship., (© 2020 American Physical Therapy Association.)

Objective: To assess whether Functional Movement Screen (FMS) score is associated with subsequent injuries in healthy sportspeople., Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis., Data Sources: The following electronic databases were searched to December 2017: Medline, PubMed, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, Embase, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database., Eligibility Criteria for Selecting Studies: Eligibility criteria included (1) prospective cohort studies that examined the association between FMS score (≤14/21) and subsequent injuries, (2) a sample of healthy and active participants without restrictions in gender or age, and (3) the OR was the effect size and the main outcome., Results: Thirteen studies met the criteria for the systematic review and 12 were included in the meta-analysis. In 5 of the 12 studies, and among female athletes in 1 study, FMS score ≤14 out of 21 points was associated with subsequent injuries. The overall OR of the selected studies in the meta-analysis was 1.86 (95% CI 1.32 to 2.61) and showed substantial heterogeneity (I 2 =70%)., Summary/conclusion: Whether or not a low FMS score ≤14 out of 21 points is associated with increased risk of injury is unclear. The heterogeneity of the study populations (type of athletes, age and sport exposure) and the definition of injury used in the studies make it difficult to synthesise the evidence and draw definitive conclusions., Trial Registration Number: CRD42015015579., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)