Search

Hormonal agents administered for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) may lead to osteoporosis, skeletal events, reduced quality of life, and even reduced overall survival (OS). Bone-modifying agents may prevent those events but their effect on cancer-control outcomes remains uncertain. Relying on our institutional tertiary-care database, we explored the effect of bone-modifying agents (bisphosphonates such as zoledronic acid and denosumab) on OS and progression-free survival in patients with mCRPC with at least 1 bone metastasis using Kaplan-Meyer estimates and Cox regression models. Of 420 patients with mCRPC, 60% received bone-modifying agents who were younger (68 vs 69 years), with more systemic treatment lines for mCRPC (3 vs 2), and a higher proportion of initial de novo metastatic disease (72% vs 62%, all p ≤.04) than patients without bone-modifying agents. In progression-free survival analyses, no significant differences were observed between both groups. In OS analyses, significant median OS differences were observed in favor of patients with bone-modifying agents (58 vs 45 months; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.66), even after multivariable adjustment (HR: 0.37; both p ≤.01). In bone-modifying agent–stratified analyses, 57% received denosumab vs 43% bisphosphonates, with a significantly higher rate of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status of ≥2 in the bisphosphonates group. In progression-free and OS analyses, no significant differences were observed between bisphosphonates and denosumab patients, with numerically better results in progression-free survival analysis for denosumab after adjusting for covariates. The cumulative rate of osteonecrosis of the jaw at any treatment time was 12% in both groups and significantly decreased over time. Real-world data suggest a relatively low administration rate of bone-modifying agents in patients with osseous mCRPC. However, real-world data also suggest an OS benefit when bone-modifying agents are used, even after controlling for possible confounding patient and tumor characteristics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate alterations of homologous recombination repair (HRR) and especially BReast CAncer 1/2 (BRCA1/2) gene on overall survival (OS). Moreover, to explore the effect of inhibition of poly(ADP‐ribose)‐polymerase (PARPi) as systemic therapy for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Patients and methods: Of all HRR‐screened patients with metastatic prostate cancer, baseline characteristics were sampled. Kaplan–Meier estimates and multivariable Cox regression models predicted the effect of HRR/BRCA1/2 alterations on OS. Results: Of 196 eligible patients, 61 (31%) harboured any HRR and 40 (20%) BRCA1/2 alterations. Of HRR alterations, 40 (66%) vs six (10%) vs five (8.2%) vs four (6.6%) vs two (3.3%) vs four (6.6%) were BRCA1/2 vs Ataxia‐telangiectasia mutated kinase (ATM) vs checkpoint kinase 2 (CHEK2) vs cyclin‐dependent kinase 12 (CDK12) vs Fanconi anaemia complementation Group A (FANCA) vs positive for other mutations. Of these, 30% received a PARPi. OS differed significantly between HRR‐positive vs ‐negative patients. Specifically in hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer, the median OS was 63 (HRR positive) vs 57 (BRCA1/2 positive) vs 113 months (HRR negative) (P ≤ 0.01). In mCRPC, OS was 42 (HRR positive) vs 41 (BRCA1/2 positive) vs 70 months (HRR negative) (P ≤ 0.01). HRR and BRCA1/2 alterations were associated with worse OS after multivariable adjustment. Finally, patients with mCRPC with BRCA1/2 mutation treated without PARPi harboured worse OS than patients with BRCA1/2 mutation and PARPi therapy (median OS: 33 vs 48 months, P < 0.03). Conclusion: Incidence of HRR alteration in a clinical real‐world setting is high when using blood‐ and tissue‐based tests. Patients with HRR/BRCA alterations have worse outcomes resulting in significant OS differences between HRR/BRCA‐positive patients with mCRPC with and without PARPi usage vs HRR/BRCA‐negative patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: No currently available phase III trial compared docetaxel vs. androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) regarding cancer-control outcomes in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Moreover, few is known about the effect of sequential therapies in mHSPC and subsequent metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Methods: We relied on the FRAMCAP database and compared docetaxel vs. ARPI in mHSPC patients regarding time to mCRPC (ttCRPC) and overall survival (OS). Sensitivity analyses addressed high volume mHSPC patients. Finally, sequential therapies were compared regarding progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in first-line mCRPC. Results: Of 419 included mHSPC patients, 25% received docetaxel vs. 75% ARPI. ARPI patients were significantly older (71 vs. 66 years), and harbored lower baseline PSA (38 vs. 183 ng/ml, both p ≤ 0.002). Median ttCRPC was significantly longer for ARPI than for docetaxel-treated patients (30 vs. 17 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.49, p < 0.001). In OS analyses, ARPI patients also exhibited significantly longer OS, relative to docetaxel patients (96 vs. 50 months, HR: 0.67, p = 0.03). After multivariable adjustment in Cox regression models, no difference between both treatments remained in both analyses (all p > 0.05). In sensitivity analyses of high volume mHSPC patients only, also no ttCRPC or OS differences were observed for ARPI vs. docetaxel (all p > 0.05). Regarding sequential therapies, no PFS and OS differences were observed for all and specifically high volume mHSPC patients, when ARPI-ARPI vs. ARPI-docetaxel vs. docetaxel-ARPI treatments were compared (all p > 0.05). Conclusion: In real-world setting, ARPI treatment performs comparable to docetaxel chemotherapy in mHSPC. Therefore, docetaxel should only be used in triplet therapy. Moreover, no differences for sequential therapies of ARPI/docetaxel combinations in first-line mCRPC were observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The landscape of systemic therapies for metastatic hormone‐sensitive (mHSPC) and castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) extensively improved within the last decades resulting in a significantly prolonged overall survival. However, subgroup analyses of phase III trials suggest potentially different overall survival outcomes for older adults. Methods: We relied on our institutional metastatic prostate cancer database to identify mHSPC and subsequently mCRPC patients. Older adults were stratified according to age groups 70–74 versus ≥75–79 versus ≥80 years at metastatic occurrence. Subsequently, uni‐ and multivariable time to mCRPC and overall survival analyses were performed. Results: Of 494 older adults, 217 (44%) were 70–74 versus 180 (36%) 75–79 versus 97 (20%) ≥80 years old. Rates of local prostate cancer treatment differed significantly between all three groups (p < 0.01). Regarding mHSPC treatment, androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) were administered in 30–39% of patients and docetaxel with 9% in age group 70–74 years and 6% and 3% in age groups 75–79 years and ≥80 years. Regarding mCRPC treatment, significant differences between treatment proportions were observed (p < 0.01). Most common treatment was ARSI for all three groups. Conversely, chemotherapy was more frequently administered in patients aged 70–74 (16%), relative to 4% and 3% in 75‐79 year and ≥80 year aged patients. In univariable and multivariable time to mCRPC analyses, overall survival in mHSPC and OS in mCRPC analyses, no significant differences between all three age groups were observed (all p ≥ 0.3). Conclusions: Treatment patterns differ significantly between older adults with metastatic prostate cancer. However, these differences may not result in differences of overall life expectancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Biochemical recurrence (BCR) represents the rise of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after treatment with curative radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation for prostate cancer. The objective of the current study was to test for the association between patient characteristics, namely age, body mass index (BMI), as well as prostate volume at surgery, and BCR after RP. Material and Methods: Within a tertiary care database, patients with prostate cancer treated with RP between January 2014 and June 2023 were included. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses and Cox regression models addressed BCR after RP according to patient characteristics. Results: Of 821 patients, the median age was 66 years (interquartile range [IQR] 61–71 years), BMI was 26.2 kg/m2 (IQR 24.3–28.8 kg/m2), and prostate volume was 40 cm3 (IQR 30–55 cm3). Median follow-up was 20 months. In survival analyses, the three-year BCR-free survival rates were 81 vs. 84 vs. 81% in patients aged ≤60 vs. 61–69 vs. 70 years (p = 0.1). In patients with BMI < 25.0 vs. 25.0–29.9 vs. ≥30.0 kg/m2, the three-year BCR-free survival rates were 84 vs. 81 vs. 84% (p = 0.7). In patients with prostate volume ≤40 vs. >40 cm3, the three-year BCR-free survival rates were 85 vs. 80% (p = 0.004). In multivariable Cox regression models accounting for patient and pathologic tumor characteristics and adjuvant radiation therapy, a higher prostate volume independently predicted BCR as continuous (hazard ratio 1.012, 95% confidence interval 1.005–1.019; p < 0.001), as well as categorized the variable based on the median (hazard ratio 1.66, 95% confidence interval 1.17–2.36; p = 0.005). Conversely, neither age nor BMI were significantly associated with BCR after RP. Conclusions: The higher prostate volume independently predicted BCR after RP, but not age or BMI at surgery. Consequently, patients with an elevated prostate volume should be considered for closer postoperative follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hormonal agents administered for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) may lead to osteoporosis, skeletal events, reduced quality of life, and even reduced overall survival (OS). Bone-modifying agents may prevent those events but their effect on cancer-control outcomes remains uncertain. Relying on our institutional tertiary-care database, we explored the effect of bone-modifying agents (bisphosphonates such as zoledronic acid and denosumab) on OS and progression-free survival in patients with mCRPC with at least 1 bone metastasis using Kaplan-Meyer estimates and Cox regression models. Of 420 patients with mCRPC, 60% received bone-modifying agents who were younger (68 vs 69 years), with more systemic treatment lines for mCRPC (3 vs 2), and a higher proportion of initial de novo metastatic disease (72% vs 62%, all p ≤ .04) than patients without bone-modifying agents. In progression-free survival analyses, no significant differences were observed between both groups. In OS analyses, significant median OS differences were observed in favor of patients with bone-modifying agents (58 vs 45 months; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.66), even after multivariable adjustment (HR: 0.37; both p ≤ .01). In bone-modifying agent-stratified analyses, 57% received denosumab vs 43% bisphosphonates, with a significantly higher rate of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status of ≥2 in the bisphosphonates group. In progression-free and OS analyses, no significant differences were observed between bisphosphonates and denosumab patients, with numerically better results in progression-free survival analysis for denosumab after adjusting for covariates. The cumulative rate of osteonecrosis of the jaw at any treatment time was 12% in both groups and significantly decreased over time. Real-world data suggest a relatively low administration rate of bone-modifying agents in patients with osseous mCRPC. However, real-world data also suggest an OS benefit when bone-modifying agents are used, even after controlling for possible confounding patient and tumor characteristics., Competing Interests: None declared., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.)