Search

The presence of hemoglobin variants can adversely affect the accuracy of some HbA1c methods depending on the variant. We examine the analytical interference from a rare Hb variant (Hb N Baltimore) with six different HbA1c methods using various method principles: two immunoassays methods (Tina-quant ® HbA1c Gen et DCA Vantage), three high-performance liquid chromatography methods (G8 HPLC, Variant II Turbo A1c 2.0 et Variant II Dual kit), and one capillary-electrophoresis method (Capillarys Hb A1c kit). Hb N Baltimore can adversely affect determination of HbA1c levels. An underestimation of HbA1c level is observed with the chromatographic methods included in this study and no HbA1c result can be obtained with the capillary-electrophoresis method. Inversely, limited impact is observed with the immunoassays methods. The presence of an hemoglobin variant should be suspected when inconsistencies are observed between a patient's home blood glucose monitoring and laboratory-measured HbA1c. In these situations additional testing should be carried out using a test based on a different analytical method.

Hb Savaria [α49(CE7)Ser→Arg; HBA2: c.150C > A] is a rare hemoglobin (Hb) variant, initially described in Eastern Europe but present worldwide. It belongs to that class of variants which can be confused with Hb S [β6(A3)Glu→Val; HBB: c.20A > T] by automated protein analysis and thus needs special tests for proper identification. Because it could arise from different nucleotide substitutions and according to the rules of the Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS) nomenclature, three 'Hb Savaria' variants are possible. In the case reported here it resulted from the HBA2: c.148A > C change.