Search

Qualitative probabilistic network (QPN) is the qualitative abstraction of a Bayesian network that encodes variables and the qualitative influences between them. In order to make QPNs be practical for real-world representation and inference of uncertain knowledge, it is desirable to reduce ambiguities in general QPNs, including unknown qualitative influences and inference conflicts. In this paper, we first extend the traditional definition of qualitative influences by adopting the probabilistic threshold. In addition, we introduce probabilistic-rough-set-based weights to the qualitative influences. The enhanced network so obtained, called EQPN, is constructed from sample data. Finally, to achieve conflict-free EQPN inferences, we resolve the trade-offs by addressing the symmetry, transitivity and composition properties. Preliminary experiments verify the correctness and feasibility of our methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Qualitative probabilistic networks were designed to overcome, to at least some extent, the quantification problem known to probabilistic networks. Qualitative networks abstract from the numerical probabilities of their quantitative counterparts by using signs to summarise the probabilistic influences between their variables. One of the major drawbacks of these qualitative abstractions, however, is the coarse level of representation detail that does not provide for indicating strengths of influences. As a result, the trade-offs modelled in a network remain unresolved upon inference. We present an enhanced formalism of qualitative probabilistic networks to provide for a finer level of representation detail. An enhanced qualitative probabilistic network differs from a basic qualitative network in that it distinguishes between strong and weak influences. Now, if a strong influence is combined, upon inference, with a conflicting weak influence, the sign of the net influence may be readily determined. Enhanced qualitative networks are purely qualitative in nature, as basic qualitative networks are, yet allow for resolving some trade-offs upon inference. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Animal movement patterns in space and time are a central aspect of animal ecology. Remotely-sensed environmental indices can play a key role in understanding movement patterns by providing contiguous, relatively fine-scale data that link animal movements to their environment. Still, implementation of newly available remotely-sensed data is often delayed in studies of animal movement, calling for a better flow of information to researchers less familiar with remotely-sensed data applications. Here, we reviewed the application of remotely-sensed environmental indices to infer movement patterns of animals in terrestrial systems in studies published between 2002 and 2013. Next, we introduced newly available remotely-sensed products, and discussed their opportunities for animal movement studies. Studies of coarse-scale movement mostly relied on satellite data representing plant phenology or climate and weather. Studies of small-scale movement frequently used land cover data based on Landsat imagery or aerial photographs. Greater documentation of the type and resolution of remotely-sensed products in ecological movement studies would enhance their usefulness. Recent advancements in remote sensing technology improve assessments of temporal dynamics of landscapes and the three-dimensional structures of habitats, enabling near real-time environmental assessment. Online movement databases that now integrate remotely-sensed data facilitate access to remotely-sensed products for movement ecologists. We recommend that animal movement studies incorporate remotely-sensed products that provide time series of environmental response variables. This would facilitate wildlife management and conservation efforts, as well as the predictive ability of movement analyses. Closer collaboration between ecologists and remote sensing experts could considerably alleviate the implementation gap. Ecologists should not expect that indices derived from remotely-sensed data will be directly analogous to field-collected data and need to critically consider which remotely-sensed product is best suited for a given analysis.