Search

Early Warning Score (EWS) systems are tools that use alterations in vital signs to rapidly identify clinically deteriorating patients and escalate care accordingly. Since its conception in 1997, EWSs have been used in several settings, including the general inpatient ward, intensive care units, and the emergency department. Several iterations of EWSs have been developed with varying levels of sensitivity and specificity for use in different populations. There are multiple strengths of these tools, including their simplicity and their ability to standardize communication and to reduce inappropriate or delayed referrals to the intensive care unit. Although early identification of deteriorating patients in the oncology population is vital to reduce morbidity and mortality and to improve long-term prognosis, the application in the oncology setting has been limited. Patients with an oncological diagnosis are usually older, medically complex, and can have increased susceptibility to infections, end-organ damage, and death. A search using PubMed and Scopus was conducted for articles published between January 1997 and November 2020 pertaining to EWSs in the oncology setting. Seven relevant studies were identified and analyzed. The most commonly used EWS in this setting was the Modified Early Warning Score. Of the seven studies, only two included prospective validation of the EWS in the oncology population and the other five only included a retrospective assessment of the data. The majority of studies were limited by their small sample size, single-institution analysis, and retrospective nature. Future studies should assess dynamic changes in scores over time and evaluate balance measures to identify use of health care resources.

The impact of adverse risk genetic profiles on outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) has not been fully elucidated. Accordingly, we have profiled somatic mutations at diagnosis using next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 178 AML patients who received allogeneic HCT. NGS revealed 598 somatic mutations in 165/178 patients (92.7%). Frequently mutated genes include DNMT3A, TET2, NPM1, RUNX1, IDH2, and FLT3. Commonly detected cytogenetic profiles include normal karyotype, trisomy 8, monosomal karyotype (MK), deletion 5, complex karyotype (CK), and monosomy 7. In univariate analyses, TP53 mutation, MK, CK, and monosomy 7 were associated with decreased overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and a higher relapse incidence (RI). We defined adverse molecular-genetic profile as harboring at least one of the molecular/genetic abnormalities of TP53 mutation, MK, CK, monosomy 7, and deletion 5. The patients harboring adverse molecular-genetic profile (n = 30) showed a lower 2-year OS (24.9% vs. 57.9%; p = 0.003), RFS (23.7% vs. 57.9%; p = 0.002), and higher RI (47.2% and 17.2%; p = 0.001) after HCT when compared to patients without those lesions. Multivariate analysis confirmed adverse molecular-genetic profile as an independent prognostic factor, associated with decreased OS (HR 2.19), RFS (HR 2.23), and higher RI (HR 2.94).

Background: venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-known complication in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), especially in patients treated with asparaginase (ASNase)-including regiments. However, VTE risk in adult Philadelphia-positive ALL (Ph+ve ALL) patients treated with non-hyperCVAD chemotherapy is unclear. In this study, we examined VTE incidence in adult Ph+ve ALL patients treated with imatinib plus a pediatric-inspired asparaginase (ASNase)-free regimen modified from the Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) ALL protocol. Methods: a single centre retrospective review of Ph+ve ALL patients treated at Princess Margaret Cancer Center (PMCC) from 2008&ndash, 2019 with imatinib plus modified DFCI protocol was conducted. Results: of the 123 patients included, 30 (24.3%) had at least 1 radiology confirmed VTE event from diagnosis to the end of maintenance therapy. 86.7% (26/30) of the VTE events occurred during active treatment. Of all VTE events, the majority (53.3%) were DVT and/or PE while another significant portion were catheter-related (40.0%). Major bleeding was observed in 1 patient on VTE treatment with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Conclusion: a high VTE incidence (24.3%) was observed in adults Ph+ve ALL patients treated with imatinib plus an ASNase-free modified DFCI pediatric ALL protocol, suggesting prophylactic anticoagulation should be considered for all adult Ph+ve ALL patients including those treated with ASNase-free regimens.

Patients with Philadelphia negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocytosis (ET), and myelofibrosis (MF), are at risk of progressing into acu...

Leukemia stem cells (LSCs) are linked to relapse in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The LSC17 gene expression score robustly captures LSC stemness properties in AML and can be used to predict survival outcomes and response to therapy, enabling risk-adapted, upfront treatment approaches. The LSC17 score was developed and validated in a research setting. To enable widespread use of the LSC17 score in clinical decision making, we established a laboratory-developed test (LDT) for the LSC17 score that can be deployed broadly in clinical molecular diagnostic laboratories. We extensively validated the LSC17 LDT in a College of American Pathologists/Clinical Laboratory Improvements Act (CAP/CLIA)-certified laboratory, determining specimen requirements, a synthetic control, and performance parameters for the assay. Importantly, we correlated values from the LSC17 LDT to clinical outcome in a reference cohort of patients with AML, establishing a median assay value that can be used for clinical risk stratification of individual patients with newly diagnosed AML. The assay was established in a second independent CAP/CLIA-certified laboratory, and its technical performance was validated using an independent cohort of patient samples, demonstrating that the LSC17 LDT can be readily implemented in other settings. This study enables the clinical use of the LSC17 score for upfront risk-adapted management of patients with AML.

Key Points DNMT3A R882, TET2, ASXL1, and SRSF2 mutations identified at the time of diagnosis are associated with delayed count recovery. Persistence of preleukemic mutations in remission at high variant allele frequency is associated with delayed count recovery.

Espresso efficiently distinguishes true mutations from background noise common in deep sequencing data., Sensitive mutation detection by next-generation sequencing is critical for early cancer detection, monitoring minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD), and guiding precision oncology. Nevertheless, because of artifacts introduced during library preparation and sequencing, the detection of low-frequency variants at high specificity is problematic. Here, we present Espresso, an error suppression method that considers local sequence features to accurately detect single-nucleotide variants (SNVs). Compared to other advanced error suppression techniques, Espresso consistently demonstrated lower numbers of false-positive mutation calls and greater sensitivity. We demonstrated Espresso’s superior performance in detecting MRD in the peripheral blood of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) throughout their treatment course. Furthermore, we showed that accurate mutation calling in a small number of informative genomic loci might provide a cost-efficient strategy for pragmatic risk prediction of AML development in healthy individuals. More broadly, we aim for Espresso to aid with accurate mutation detection in many other research and clinical settings.

The impact of adverse risk genetic profiles on outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) has not been fully elucidated. Accordingly, we have profiled somatic mutations at diagnosis using next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 178 AML patients who received allogeneic HCT. NGS revealed 598 somatic mutations in 165/178 patients (92.7%). Frequently mutated genes include DNMT3A, TET2, NPM1, RUNX1, IDH2, and FLT3. Commonly detected cytogenetic profiles include normal karyotype, trisomy 8, monosomal karyotype (MK), deletion 5, complex karyotype (CK), and monosomy 7. In univariate analyses, TP53 mutation, MK, CK, and monosomy 7 were associated with decreased overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and a higher relapse incidence (RI). We defined adverse molecular-genetic profile as harboring at least one of the molecular/genetic abnormalities of TP53 mutation, MK, CK, monosomy 7, and deletion 5. The patients harboring adverse molecular-genetic profile (n = 30) showed a lower 2-year OS (24.9% vs. 57.9%; p = 0.003), RFS (23.7% vs. 57.9%; p = 0.002), and higher RI (47.2% and 17.2%; p = 0.001) after HCT when compared to patients without those lesions. Multivariate analysis confirmed adverse molecular-genetic profile as an independent prognostic factor, associated with decreased OS (HR 2.19), RFS (HR 2.23), and higher RI (HR 2.94).

We thank Wu and colleagues for their important commentary regarding potential psychological effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on health care providers.[1][1] Our group of multidisciplinary oncology providers was formed to support oncology health care providers, a group at high risk of

Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia is characterized by t(8;21) or inv(16) and the fusion proteins RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and CBFB-MYH11. International guidelines recommend monitoring for measurable residual disease every 3 months for 2 years after treatment. However, it is not known whether serial molecular monitoring can predict and prevent morphological relapse. We conducted a retrospective singlecenter study of 114 patients in complete remission who underwent molecular monitoring with real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 or CBFB-MYH11 transcripts every 3 months. Morphological relapse was defined as re-emergence of >5% blasts and molecular relapse as ≥1 log increase in transcript level between two samples. Over a median follow-up time of 3.7 years (range, 0.2-14.3), remission persisted in 71 (62.3%) patients but 43 (37.7%) developed molecular or morphological relapse. Patients who achieved

BACKGROUND: Isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) mutations are found in about 10-15% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases. Enasidenib (ENA) is a first-in-class mutant IDH2 inhibitor that induces differentiation of IDH2-mutated leukemic cells. However, the clinical efficacy of single agent ENA therapy in relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML is limited, underscoring the need for combination therapy. Preclinical studies have shown that IDH-mutated leukemic cells are particularly sensitive to BCL2 inhibition with venetoclax (VEN), a finding supported by clinical studies of VEN combination therapies. We previously demonstrated that the combination of ENA and VEN can be more effective than each drug alone, in reducing leukemic burden in patient-derived xenograft models of IDH2-mutated AML. Here, we report preliminary safety and efficacy results of an ongoing open-label, single-arm, phase Ib/II trial (NCT04092179) of ENA in combination with VEN in patients with IDH2-mutated myeloid malignancies. METHODS: Patients 18 years of age or above with IDH2-mutated R/R AML or high-risk MDS/MPN and an ECOG performance status of 0-2 were eligible. Patients previously treated with an IDH2 or BCL2 inhibitor were excluded. Participants received VEN continuously starting on cycle 1 day 1 with a 3-day ramp-up to a target dose of 400 mg daily (dose level 0) in cohorts 1 and 2. ENA was administered at 100 mg daily continuously starting on cycle 1 day 15. Each cycle was 28 days. Concurrent use of a moderate or strong CYP3A4 inhibitor was allowed with 50% dose reduction of VEN after completion of the first 2 cycles at 100% target dose. Interruptions of VEN and/or ENA were permitted for management of adverse events (AEs). Primary endpoints were 1) safety and tolerability and 2) overall response rate (ORR) defined as complete remission (CR) + CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) + morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) + partial remission (PR) by revised IWG criteria. Secondary endpoints include pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of VEN, duration of response, overall survival (OS), and IDH2 mutant allele burden in bone marrow by ddPCR. RESULTS: The study opened to recruitment in November of 2020. As of July 28, 2021 (data cutoff), 11 patients were enrolled on study; 10 with R/R AML and 1 with very-high risk MDS by IPSS-R. Six patients had a R140Q mutation, and 5 had a R172K mutation. Median age was 72 years (range: 32 - 80); 6 patients were male. Participants had received a median of 2 prior lines of therapies (range: 1 - 4). Six of 10 AML patients had primary refractory disease. The MDS patient experienced secondary azacitidine failure. Key treatment emergent grade ≥ 3 AEs regardless of attribution were: febrile neutropenia (n=3), intracranial hemorrhage (n=3), lung infection (n=2), other infection (n=2), elevated AST/ALT (n=2), sepsis (n=1), leukocytosis (n=1), TRALI (n=1), and small bowel obstruction (n=1). No cases of differentiation or tumor lysis syndrome were observed. No patients discontinued the study due to AEs. The addition of ENA, a known inhibitor of CYP3A4, did not significantly affect the PK profiles of VEN. Nine of the AML patients completed at least 1 cycle of treatment and are considered evaluable for efficacy. One AML patient died from intracranial hemorrhage prior to completion of cycle 1. Median duration of observation is 3.5 months. Of the evaluable patients, CR was achieved in 2 patients (22%) and CRi in 3 patients (33%) for an ORR of 55% (Fig. 1). Median number of cycles to response was 3. All responders remain in remission and on study with a median of 6 cycles received to date (range: 3 - 8). Of the remaining 4 patients, 2 patients (22%) remain on study with stable disease, and 2 patients (22%) experienced progressive disease and died (one after 7 cycles and the other after 1 cycle). Median OS for the entire cohort has not been reached. A sustained reduction in mutant IDH2 allele frequency in bone marrow correlated with response (Fig. 2). For the MDS patient, no response was observed after 1 cycle of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: VEN in combination with ENA is a well-tolerated regimen with no dose-limiting toxicities observed at the current dose level. The preliminary efficacy of this combination is encouraging with an ORR of 55% in evaluable R/R AML patients, with some responders achieving deep molecular remissions. Patient enrollment in dose-escalation cohorts is ongoing. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Chan: AbbVie: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Gupta: Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Constellation Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy; BMS-Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy. Maze: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene-BMS: Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding; PharmaEssentia: Research Funding; Kronos Bio: Research Funding. Minden: Astellas: Consultancy. Schimmer: Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Medivir AB: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Otsuka Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; UHN: Patents & Royalties. Schuh: AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GlycoMimetics: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Research Funding; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yee: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann La Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Shattuck Labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onconova: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Otsuka: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Paladin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Geron: Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; TaiHo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria; Astex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. DiNardo: Agios/Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Notable Labs: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Foghorn: Honoraria, Research Funding; Forma: Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; ImmuneOnc: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene, a Bristol Myers Squibb company: Honoraria, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Enasidenib is approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory AML as single agent. Venetoclax, in combination with azacitidine or low-dose cytarabine, is approved for the treatment of newly diagnosed AML patients who are 75 years or older, or who have comorbidities that preclude use of intensive induction chemotherapy.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by accumulation of myeloid cells in the bone marrow because of impaired differentiation and proliferation, resulting in hematopoietic insufficiency. NPM1 is one of the most commonly mutated genes in AML, present in 20-30% of cases. Mutations in NPM1 represent a distinct entity in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification and commonly indicate a better risk prognosis. In this review, we discuss the many functions of NPM1, the consequence of mutations in NPM1 and possible mechanisms through which mutations lead to leukemogenesis. We also discuss clinical consequences of mutations, associated gene expression patterns and the role of NPM1 mutations in informing prognosis and therapeutic decisions and predicting relapse in AML.

Introduction: CFI-400945 is a first-in-class, potent, selective, orally active inhibitor of Polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4) (Ki=0.26nM), a master regulator of centriole duplication, necessary for genomic integrity (Mason et al. Cancer Cell 2014; 26:163-76). CFI-400945 has activity in leukemia cell lines and primary leukemia samples including those with complex karyotype, inversion 3 and monosomy 7 (Minden. personal communications). This suggests that CFI-400945 may provide an effective treatment of patients with AML. The objectives of this phase 1 trial was to establish the safety, tolerability, and recommend phase II dose (RP2D) of CFI-400945 in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory AML or MDS and patients with untreated AML who refused induction chemotherapy or who are not candidates for intensive chemotherapy were eligible. Dose escalation followed a standard 3+3 design with a starting dose of 64 mg orally once daily. Plasma levels of CFI-400945 free base were measured on Days 1, 2, & 29 of Cycle 1 and Day 15 on all subsequent cycles. Peripheral blood and/or bone marrow were obtained at baseline, Day 8 of Cycle 1 and Day 1 of each subsequent cycle prior to dosing for pharmacodynamic monitoring. Safety assessments using the NCI CTCAE version 4.03 were performed. Results: From May 2018 to June 2019, nine patients have been enrolled on study across three pre-defined dose levels (64 mg [n=3], 96 mg [n=4], and 128 mg [n=2]). Three patients had untreated AML, five patients had relapsed/refractory AML and one patient had myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative disorder (MDS/MPN). Patient characteristics at diagnosis are outlined in Table 1. Six (67%) patients had baseline high throughput sequencing; the most frequent mutations were TP53 (33%), TET2 (33%), KRAS (33%) and DNMT3A (33%). A total of 20 cycles were administered with a median of 1 cycle (range, 0 to 7 cycles). The most common non-hematological drug related toxicities of any grade, which occurred in over 20%, were diarrhea (44%), headache (44%), colitis (33%), vomiting (33%), bilirubin increase (22%), dizziness (22%), fatigue (22%), and nausea (22%). One patient on the 96 mg dose level was not evaluable for DLT and hence, replaced. Both patients treated at the 128 mg/day dose level developed DLTs, consisting of grade 3 colitis and grade 5 sepsis and colitis. Pharmacokinetic profile indicated low interpatient variability between patients. Maximum exposure did not correlate with toxicity Six patients were evaluable for disease response. Two (33%) achieved complete remission (CR), 3 pts (50%) had stable disease (with one patient having a 78% reduction in marrow blast count). The patient with MDS/MPN who did not complete 1 cycle of therapy progressed to AML (Figure 1). Both patients who obtained a CR had an early response within 2 cycles. One CR has been durable for 218 days with no measurable residual disease (MRD) by flow cytometry. The additional patient, who obtained a CR with incomplete platelets recovery, with subsequent best response of CR, had a sustained response for 91 days before relapse was confirmed by bone marrow examination (Figure 1). Conclusion: Single agent CFI-400945 has activity in patients with poor risk AML. The RP2D in this population is 96 mg once daily. Dose expansion is occurring at the RP2D level. A phase 2 study with CFI-400945 single agent or in combination study with azacitidine or decitabine is planned. Disclosures Leber: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Lundbeck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda/Palladin: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Treadwell: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bray:Treadwell Therapeutics: Current Employment; TIO Discovery: Current Employment. Gupta:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol MyersSquibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding. Maze:Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding. McNamara:Novartis: Honoraria. Schimmer:Jazz: Honoraria; Otsuka: Honoraria; Medivir AB: Research Funding; AbbVie Pharmaceuticals: Other: owns stock ; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria.

BACKGROUND: Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) has increasingly been used for measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), while next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based MRD monitoring tool is in clinical development for its application. Clonal hematopoiesis (CH), in which leukemia-associated somatic mutations gene are present in individuals with no apparent hematologic disease, adds a challenge in the detection of MRD. In patients with AML, CH could be potentially pre-leukemic, while persistent mutations in DNMT3A, TET2 orASXL1 (DTA) in remission marrow are usually removed from the analysis of residual leukemic cells. However, reports suggest that persistent DTA mutations in remission may be correlated with an increased relapse risk. In the patients with DTA mutations, the use of NGS for MRD monitoring is limited or modified due to the presence of CH clone in the remission marrow. We evaluated whether MFC-MRD can be adjunctive to predict the risk of AML relapse in this population of 221 patients with DTA mutation (DNMT3A (n=123), ASXL1 (n=56) or TET2 (n=100). METHODS: The present study evaluated long-term outcomes in AML patients who achieved first complete remission (CR1) and compared outcomes according to MFC-based MRD status (was defined as negative if patients achieved 0.1 or less) assessed at the time of CR1. A total of 435 patients diagnosed with AML and treated with induction chemotherapy between 2015 and 2018 were included. MFC-MRD was assessed in 336 patients in CR1 (77%). NGS was performed using samples obtained at the time of initial diagnosis and used for mutational subgroup classification. Overall survival (OS) was calculated as the date of CR1 to the date of death and censored on the date of the last follow-up. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was defined as the time from the date of CR1 to the date of relapse or death from any cause. Cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were calculated considering competing risk. The Kaplan-Meier method using a log-rank test and a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was used for analyses of time-to-event endpoints. For CIR and NRM, Gray test was performed for the risk factors and the Fine-Gray model was adopted for the multivariate model. RESULTS: According to the MFC-MRD status, i.e., the group with positive MRD (MRDpos; n=118, 35%) vs. those with negative MRD (MRDneg; n=218, 65%), we evaluated OS, RFS, and CIR. The MFC-MRDneg group showed better OS at 2 years 67.0% than the MFC-MRDpos group 40.7% (p We divided the groups according to the number of induction treatment courses, AML type, cytogenetics risk, and age ( Also, we evaluated MFC-MRD status at CR by mutational profile subgroup. Long-term outcomes such as OS, RFS, CIR or NRM were compared by the mutational subgroup. It consistently showed a trend of superior OS, RFS and lower risk of CIR in patients with MFC-MRDneg compared to MFC-MRDposTab1. Of interest, in the subgroup of patients carrying any DTA mutations (n=221), those with MFC-MRDneg (n=103) showed better OS (HR 1.61 [1.01-2.55%]; p=0.042), RFS (HR 1.66 [1.06-2.61%]; p=0.026) and CIR (HR 1.99[1.03-3.83%]; p=0.04) compared to those MFC-MRDpos (n=64; Fig 1). Multivariate analysis confirmed that the MFC-MRDneg is an independent prognostic factor in patients with DTAmutwith respect to OS: MFC-MRDpos (HR 1.63, p=0.04) and age (≥60; HR 2.04, p=0.008) for OS; for RFS, MFC-MRDpos (HR 1.71, p=0.02) and age (≥60; HR 2.32, p= 0.001); for CIR, MFC-MRDpos (HR 2.31, p=0.01) and HCT (HR 0.14, p= Conclusion: These findings suggest that in AML patients with DTAmut, MFC-MRD status at the time of remission assessment can be a tool for MRD assessment when NGS-based MRD assessment is limited. Further study is strongly warranted to reach a clearer conclusion with multiple cohorts. Disclosures Schimmer: Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Otsuka: Honoraria; Medivir AB: Research Funding; AbbVie Pharmaceuticals: Other: owns stock . Tierens:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. McNamara:Novartis: Honoraria. Maze:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding. Gupta:Pfizer: Consultancy; Bristol MyersSquibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Introduction: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is driven by a subpopulation of leukemia stem cells (LSCs), which possess properties such as quiescence and self-renewal that are linked to therapy resistance and relapse. The LSC17 score was derived from genes differentially expressed between functionally validated LSC+ and LSC- fractions from 78 AML patients and is strongly associated with survival and response to standard therapy. A critical advantage of the LSC17 test over cytogenetic and molecular analysis is its rapid turnaround time (24-48h on a NanoString platform), providing clinicians with a rapid and powerful tool for upfront risk stratification. We have developed a clinical assay for the LSC17 score validated in a CAP/CLIA-lab setting. Methods: We conducted a prospective, multicenter validation and feasibility study to test the prognostic value of the LSC17 assay under real-world conditions in AML patients treated with curative intent. Patients with a possible new diagnosis of AML were eligible. Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia were excluded from analysis. Standard prognostic markers including cytogenetics, molecular studies and targeted sequencing using a standard AML panel were performed in parallel to the LSC17 score. Treatment was administered according to physician preference, based on patient history and results of standard prognostic assays, when available. Survival data was censored on June 14th, 2020. Results: 381 patients were recruited to the study between June 2016 and March 2020. 4 patients were excluded for quality control reasons (one sample had insufficient RNA and three samples failed quality control checks). 103 were excluded as they had alternative diagnoses. 84 patients were excluded because they did not receive intensive chemotherapy. LSC17 scores ranged from 0 to 1.25, and were classified as high or low according to the median score of 0.51 from a previously validated reference cohort (Ng et al, Nature 2016). Of the 190 patients included in this analysis, 84 had a low LSC17 score and 106 had a high LSC17 score. The median age was 61 years (range 18-79); 86 (45%) were female. When stratified according to ELN 2017 criteria, 48 (27%), 51 (29%), and 77 (44%) patients had favorable, intermediate, and adverse risk disease, respectively. Low LSC17 score was associated with normal cytogenetics (high vs low, 33% vs 58%; P We first considered response to induction chemotherapy (Table 1). 141 patients had standard induction chemotherapy with 3+7, 40 had Flag-IDA and 9 had CPX-351. High score patients had inferior responses to 3+7 with only 59% achieving complete remission (CR) after 1 cycle of chemotherapy compared to 96% of low score patients; responses for LSC17 high score patients were better in the Flag-IDA group with 80% achieving CR after 1 cycle. When considering overall CR rates after 2 cycles of induction, patients with a high LSC17 score were less likely to achieve CR (high vs low, 87% vs 98%; P=0.02). However, this difference was predominantly observed in patients treated with 3+7 (87% vs 99% CR rate in high vs low score patients, respectively); response rates to Flag-IDA were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring by flow cytometry was performed at the time of CR in 135 (71%) patients enrolled at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Patients with a high LSC17 score were significantly more likely to have MRD compared to low score patients (46% vs 10% respectively, P Conclusion: AML patients with a high LSC17 score have inferior outcomes following 3+7 induction chemotherapy. The LSC17 score should be considered as a tool to identify and stratify high-risk patients to alternative upfront therapies such as Flag-IDA. A risk adapted study is planned to validate these results. Disclosures Gupta: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bristol MyersSquibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding. Maze:Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy. McNamara:Novartis: Honoraria. Schimmer:Medivir AB: Research Funding; AbbVie Pharmaceuticals: Other: owns stock ; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Otsuka: Honoraria. Leber:Takeda/Palladin: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Treadwell: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Lundbeck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Tierens:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wang:Trilium therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: There is an existing license agreement between TTI and University Health Network and J.C.Y.W. may be entitled to receive financial benefits further to this license and in accordance with UHN's intellectual property policies. .

Background and objectives: CPX-351 is a liposomal formulation of daunorubicin and cytarabine in a fixed synergistic ratio of 5:1. It has been approved by both the FDA and EMA for use in high risk AML including therapy related AML (t-AML) and AML with myelodysplastic related change (AML-MRC). When compared with '3+7', CPX-351 resulted in superior OS (9.56 vs 5.96 months) and overall response rate (47.7% v 33.3%; P = .016; Lancet JCO 2018). However, this is little data of CPX-351 in a real world setting. The primary objective of our multi-centre study was to assess outcomes and associated toxicities of CPX-351 in these high risk AML patients. Methods: Patients aged 18 and over who were treated with CPX-351 and who met the WHO criteria for t-AML and AML-MRC were included in the study. Retrospective data was collected from 6 centres throughout Canada. Targeted sequencing was performed on DNA samples using the TruSight Myeloid Sequencing Panel isolated from peripheral blood or bone marrow samples at diagnosis. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Fifty patients treated with CPX-351 were identified from six centres. Baseline characteristics are seen in Table 1. Cytogenetics was available in 45 (90%) patients and an abnormal karyotype was seen in 30 (60%) patients. Monosomal (33%) and complex (28%) karyotype were the most common chromosomal abnormalities seen. Targeted sequencing was performed on 64% patients (32/50) and the average number of mutations was 2(0-7). RUNX1 was the most commonly mutated gene found in 22% (7/32), followed by SRSF2 in 19% (6/32) with ASXL1 and NRAS both at 16% (5/32). Other commonly mutated genes were NPM1, IDH2, DNMT3a and TP53 all occurred at a frequency of 12% (4/32). Of the 10 patients (20%) that were FLT3 mutated (80% ITD and 20% TKD), 5 patients received the FLT3 inhibitor midostaurin in combination with CPX-351. Assessing treatment responses, 50% (25/50) of patients achieved a complete remission (CR) or a complete remission with incomplete recovery (CRi). Median neutrophil recovery (≥500/μl) was 32 days (range 18-68) and median platelet recovery (≥50 000/μl) was 34 days (range 19-70). Proven or probable fungal infection was seen in 10 (20%) patients. 30 day mortality was 4% (2/50) and 60-day mortality was 10% (5/50). The median CR duration was short at 7.17 months. Of the 25 patients who did not achieve a CR, 6 (24%) had prior azacitidine use for MDS suggesting CPX-351 may not have activity in this group of patients. Median follow up was 7.43 months (range 0.2 to 18 months). OS was 44% at 12 months (0.28-0.58 95% CI) and 29% at 18 months (Fig 1; 0.13-0.46 95% CI). PFS was 28% at 12 months (0.15-0.43 95% CI) and 18% at 18 months (0.06-0.39 95% CI). There were no differences in OS when stratified by ELN risk (p=0.25), adverse risk cytogenetics (p=0.1485), or poor risk mutations such as FLT3-ITD (p=0.29), RUNX1 (p=0.123) or ASXL1 (p=0.06). This is consistent with previous studies, which suggest that CPX-351 overcomes the poor prognosis associated with these mutations. 18 (36%) patients received an allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) in CR1. Patients who received a allogeneic transplant had significant improvement of OS of 62% at 18 months compared to those who did not receive a transplant of 14.5% at 18 months (Fig 2; p=0.0008). Conclusion Our study reveals that CPX-351 produces high remission rates in patients with AML with a similar efficacy and toxicity profile seen in the Phase 3 trial data (Lancet JCO 2018). However, response rates are short and therefore CPX-351 is most effective when used as a bridge for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in this high risk population. Disclosures Assouline: AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Brandwein:Celgene: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Taiho: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Gupta:Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol MyersSquibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maze:Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria. McNamara:Novartis: Honoraria. Sanford:Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schimmer:Medivir AB: Research Funding; AbbVie Pharmaceuticals: Other: owns stock ; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Otsuka: Honoraria.

Background: CFI-400945 is a potent, selective, orally administered, first-in-class inhibitor of the serine/threonine kinase, Polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4). PLK4 is a highly conserved master regulator of centriole duplication, and is critical for maintenance of genomic integrity. Aberrant expression of PLK4 results in a number of effects including the centrosome amplification often seen in aneuploid cancers, pointing to a potentially causative role for PLK4 in genome instability and cancer progression. A Phase 1 study has been completed evaluating CFI-400945 as a monotherapy in solid tumors, showing a tolerable safety profile and promising signs of activity. As acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a disease characterized by genomic instability, it is of significant interest as a potential indication for the clinical evaluation of CFI-400945. pre-clinical studies, CFI-400945 showed potent activity towards leukemia cell lines and primary human samples in vitro, as well as marked efficacy in two subcutaneous models of leukemia, specifically the MV4-11 FLT3-ITD AML. A Phase 1 trial in AML was initiated at the Princess Margaret Cancer Center in 2018, and of six patients evaluable for response, two (33%) achieved complete remission (CR), and 3 patients (50%) had stable disease (with one patient having a 78% reduction in marrow blast count) [re: Murphy et al, ASH 2020]. These promising results have led to a plan for an expanded trial examining CFI-400945 in AML, particularly focused on complex karyotype (CK). Study Design and Methods: The study will have 4 parts, Part 1A (1A): a single agent dose escalation portion, Part 1B (1B): a food effect portion once the MTD of 1A is determined, and combinations with azacitidine (2A), and decitabine (2B). For parts 1A and 1B, patients with relapsed and/or refractory AML, MDS, or CMML after >1 prior therapy will be included. Patients with MDS or CMML must have progressed or had a lack of response after at least 4 cycles of hypomethylating agents. For parts 2A and 2B, patients should have relapsed and/or refractory AML or untreated MDS or CMML. Untreated patients who decline or are ineligible for intensive therapy may be included. The study will use a standard 3 + 3 design. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) will be defined as the dose level where the number of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) is Biomarker Selection and companion Diagnostics: No biomarker based pre-selection of patients. PD evaluations will include blast reduction and markers of mitosis. Study Treatment and Endpoints: Part 1: Each cycle will be 28 days (21 days on/7 days off). Starting does of CFI-400945 will be 32mg po. Once the MTD of 1A is determined, 1B will explore the food effect of a high fat meal on the PK of CFI-400945 at the MTD. 2A and 2B will explore the combination of CFI-400945 with standard dose of either azacitidine (2A) or decitabine (2B). The starting dose of CFI-400945 will be 32mg po for 21 days on/7 off. The DLTs will be defined as NCI CTCAE V5.0 Grade >3 related non-hematologic event(s) occurring during cycle 1 or prolonged pancytopenia in the presence of a hypocellular bone marrow > day 42 without evidence of disease. The efficacy endpoints for AML, MDS, and CMML include the overall response rate, and the CR rate per standard criteria. The aim of the food effect part of the study is the asses the effect of high fat food on the PK of CFI-400945. The safety endpoint is the incidence of treatment emergent adverse events. PK endpoints include evaluations of parameters such as half-life, AUC, etc. Exploratory endpoints include eval of minimal residual disease, genomic alterations and other molecular features associated with response and biological effects of PLK4 inhibition. Disclosures Jonas: Amgen: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; GlycoMimetics: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; Sigma Tau: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Tolero: Consultancy; Treadwell: Consultancy; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Accelerated Medical Diagnostics: Research Funding; AROG: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; Forma: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Hanmi: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; LP Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Bixby:GlycoMimetics: Research Funding. Brandwein:Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Taiho: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Michelson:Treadwell Therapeutics: Consultancy. Bray:TIO Discovery: Current Employment; Treadwell Therapeutics: Current Employment. Roberts-Thomson:Treadwell Therapeutics: Current Employment. Borthakur:BioTherix: Consultancy; FTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Nkarta Therapeutics: Consultancy; Treadwell Therapeutics: Consultancy; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Argenx: Consultancy; Oncoceutics: Research Funding; Xbiotech USA: Research Funding; Polaris: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; BioLine Rx: Research Funding; Jannsen: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; BioLine Rx: Consultancy; PTC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Curio Science LLC: Consultancy; Cyclacel: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding.

Upfront therapy for newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) includes intensive induction chemotherapy with curative intent, low dose chemotherapy, best supportive care, and clinical trials. The choice between these therapies is influenced by multiple factors including age, cytogenetic and molecular mutations, and performance status. In our single payer provincial health care system, induction chemotherapy and clinical trials are only offered at a small number of specialized quaternary care centers with geographically large catchment areas. As a result, some patients are required to travel long distances for their appointments, which may constitute a barrier to care, especially among elderly patients. We therefore asked whether distance from the quaternary center influences the choice of care for AML. We reviewed the records of patients ≥18 years of age diagnosed with AML from 2015-2017 and assessed at our quaternary care center in Toronto, Canada. We compared upfront therapy choice and survival between patients living close versus distant from the cancer center (empirically defined as 50km) and stratified by age. A total of 675 patients were assessed by our quaternary center for a new diagnosis of AML during the timeframe studied. Of those patients, 477 (71%) patients lived ≤50km, and 198 (29%) patients lived >50km from the quaternary center. The overall median distance from patient residence to the quaternary center was 33.2km (range: 1-1791km), and the median distance of patients in the >50km group was 93km (range: 50.2-1791km). Age, sex, baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG), and cytogenetic risk were not significantly different between the two groups. There were no differences in the proportion of patients receiving induction chemotherapy or clinical trial as upfront therapy between patients living close versus distant from the quaternary center, even when stratified for age ≥70 years. There was no difference in overall survival between patients living ≤50km versus >50km from the quaternary center either overall, or when stratified by age. In conclusion, geographic distance from treatment center does not appear to impact choice of upfront therapy, access to clinical trials, or clinical outcomes in this study of newly diagnosed patients with AML treated in a single payer environment. Disclosures Gupta: Bristol MyersSquibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maze:Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding. McNamara:Novartis: Honoraria. Schimmer:Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Otsuka: Honoraria; Medivir AB: Research Funding; AbbVie Pharmaceuticals: Other: owns stock .

DNA methylation patterns are frequently altered in cancer cells as compared to normal cells. A large body of research associates these DNA methylation aberrations with cancer initiation and progression. Moreover, cancer cells seem to depend upon these aberrant DNA methylation profiles to thrive. Finally, DNA methylation modifications are reversible, highlighting the potential to target the global methylation patterns for cancer therapy. In this review, we will discuss the scientific and clinical aspects of DNA methylation in cancer. We will review the limited success of targeting DNA methylation in the clinic, the associated clinical challenges, the impact of novel DNA methylation inhibitors and how combination therapies are improving patient outcomes.

Author(s): Kim, Jaeseung C; Zuzarte, Philip C; Murphy, Tracy; Chan-Seng-Yue, Michelle; Brown, Andrew MK; Krzyzanowski, Paul M; Smith, Adam C; Notta, Faiyaz; Minden, Mark D; McPherson, John D

The use of liquid biopsies for cancer detection and management is rapidly gaining prominence1. Current methods for the detection of circulating tumour DNA involve sequencing somatic mutations using cell-free DNA, but the sensitivity of these methods may be low among patients with early-stage cancer given the limited number of recurrent mutations2–5. By contrast, large-scale epigenetic alterations—which are tissue- and cancer-type specific—are not similarly constrained6 and therefore potentially have greater ability to detect and classify cancers in patients with early-stage disease. Here we develop a sensitive, immunoprecipitation-based protocol to analyse the methylome of small quantities of circulating cell-free DNA, and demonstrate the ability to detect large-scale DNA methylation changes that are enriched for tumour-specific patterns. We also demonstrate robust performance in cancer detection and classification across an extensive collection of plasma samples from several tumour types. This work sets the stage to establish biomarkers for the minimally invasive detection, interception and classification of early-stage cancers based on plasma cell-free DNA methylation patterns. An immunoprecipitation-based protocol is developed to analyse DNA methylation in small quantities of circulating cell-free DNA, and can detect and classify cancers in plasma samples from several tumour types.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common acute forms of leukemia in adults. It has a poor long-term survival with a high relapse rate and at relapse, is commonly resistant to available therapies. The current combination of daunorubicin (DNR) for three days and cytarabine (Ara-C) as a continuous infusion for seven days, more commonly known as '3 + 7' has remained essentially unaltered over the last forty-four years and remains the standard induction regimen internationally. Areas covered: This paper will briefly review clinically important trials related to '3 + 7'. Somatic mutations in AML that are linked to chemoresistance to '3 + 7'will be discussed. Other topics covered include the novel ratiometric agent containing daunorubicin and cytarabine, CPX-351, and midostaurin in FLT3 mutated AML. Expert opinion: '3 + 7' continues to be the backbone of therapy for AML. However, genetic risk stratification should be used to determine patients who are unlikely to respond to standard intensive chemotherapy and hence, should be enrolled onto a clinical trial upfront. This will facilitate development of newer effective treatment strategies in AML. Patients with mutations that are associated with chemoresistance should be offered therapies which may circumvent or overcome these pathways.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive hematological malignancy with a poor outcome; overall survival is approximately 35% at two years and some subgroups have a less than 5% two-year survival. Recently, significant improvements have been made in our understanding of AML biology and genetics. These fundamental discoveries are now being translated into new therapies for this disease. This review will discuss recent advances in AML biology and the emerging treatments that are arising from biological studies. Specifically, we will consider new therapies that target molecular mutations in AML and dysregulated pathways such as apoptosis and mitochondrial metabolism. We will also discuss recent advances in immune and cellular therapy for AML.

During 2010–2011, varicella vaccination was an added requirement for school entrance in Wyoming. Vaccination exemption rates were compared during the 2009–2010 and 2011–2012 school years, and impacts of implementing a new childhood vaccine requirement were evaluated. All public schools, grades K–12, were required to report vaccination status of enrolled children for the 2009–2010 and 2011–2012 school years to the Wyoming Department of Health. Exemption data were analyzed by exemption category, vaccine, county, grade, and rurality. The proportion of children exempt for ≥1 vaccine increased from 1.2% (1,035/87,398) during the 2009–2010 school year to 1.9% (1,678/89,476) during 2011–2012. In 2011, exemptions were lowest (1.5%) in urban areas and highest (2.6%) in the most rural areas, and varicella vaccine exemptions represented 67.1% (294/438) of single vaccination exemptions. Implementation of a new vaccination requirement for school admission led to an increased exemption rate across Wyoming.

Introduction: Clinical outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in adolescents and young adults (AYA) are rarely reported as an isolated subgroup. Treatments vary little across age groups, and treatment intensity depends upon comorbid conditions and performance status. Optimal treatment strategies focused on disease behavior, biological factors, and the distinct needs of this subset of AML patients remain elusive. The purpose of this retrospective analysis is to determine the characteristics and outcomes of AYA AML patients treated at a specialized adult leukemia cancer center in comparison to older adults with AML (40-60 years). Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients treated at Princess Margaret Cancer Center from 2008-2018. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia were excluded. Clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and survival outcomes were recorded for all patients. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method and the impact of covariates were assessed using the Log-rank test. Finally, we compared the outcomes of AYA patients treated at our centre between 2015-2018 with older patients. Results: A total of 175 patients aged 18-39 were identified. Patient characteristics are shown in (Table 1). Cytogenetic were available in 163 patients. Based on MRC criteria, 27 (16%) were favorable risk, intermediate in 95 (54%), adverse in 39 (22%), and missing/failed in 14(8%). NPM1 status was available in 110 patients of whom 38 (35%) were positive. FLT3-ITD was available in 67 patients with 24 (36%) positive. Both mutations were present in 13 (54%) patients. There were no significant differences in terms of risk stratification based on cytogenetic and molecular markers based on age (18-29 vs.30-39) (P= 0.98). Most patients 172 (98%) received induction, 157 (91%) with 3+7, and 15 (9%) with FLAG-IDA. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 133 (77%) after first induction [120 (76%) after 3+7 and 11 (73%) after FLAG-IDA]. Induction related mortality was low (2%). Of the 39 who did not achieve CR, thirty-four patients received re-induction (13 FLAG-IDA, 16 NOVE-HiDAC, 5 others) with CR in 21 (62%). Overall, 154 (89.5%) achieved CR1. Sixty-four (42%) proceeded to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in CR1. 59 (38%) patients relapsed in CR1 with 8 (12%) relapsing post HSCT. Fifty-five (5 post HSCT) patients received reinduction with 30 (51%) (2 after HSCT) achieving CR2. Fifteen patients received HSCT in CR2. OS and DFS at 2 years were 62% (95% CI 0.53-0.69) and 50% (95% CI 0.41-0.57), respectively. Stratified by cytogenetic risk, OS was 81% for favorable risk, 61% for intermediate, and 50% for adverse risk (P=0.0001), respectively. DFS in these groups was 85%, 57%, and 46 % (P=0.0025), respectively. We further compared outcomes in the 18-29y and 30-39y age groups. The OS was 61.9% compared to 62.5% (P=0.91) and DFS of 52.1% compared to 47% (P=0.65) respectively. On univariate analysis for OS and DFS, cytogenetic risk stratification was the only significant variable (P=0.0004 and P=0.0042). We then compared the outcomes 67 sequential patients aged I8-39 treated from 2014-2018, with those of 176 sequential patients aged 40-60 treated during the same period (table 2). OS at 2 years was not statistically higher in the younger group compared to the older group (66.7% vs. 61.2%, P=0.372). While relapse rate was lower in older patients (15.5% vs. 22.6%, P=0.093), NRM was higher in older patients (29.7% vs. 18.8%,P=0.094). Conclusion: AYA pts. occupy a unique niche amongst AML as a whole. While treatment responses have improved in general, there may be potential for further gains in these patients. Increased tolerance for more intense treatment strategies as well as the incorporation of novel agents into standard treatment protocols may provide a means to optimize care in AYA patients. Finally, research is needed to elucidate biological mechanisms and predictors of disease behavior instead of arbitrary, age-stratified treatment schema. Disclosures McNamara: Novartis Pharmaceutical Canada Inc.: Consultancy. Schimmer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Medivir Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Otsuka Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Schuh:Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva Canada Innovation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maze:Pfizer Inc: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yee:Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astex: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hoffman La Roche: Research Funding. Minden:Trillium Therapetuics: Other: licensing agreement. Gupta:Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Introduction: A 17-gene stemness score (LSC17 score) had been reported to determine the risk of therapy resistance in acute myeloid leukemia (Nature 2016), and this was replicated successfully in 5 independent cohorts (n=908). When the patients were stratified according to the median value of the LSC17 score, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) did not affect overall survival (OS) from initial diagnosis for either high- or low-score patients (p=0.2 for high and p=0.06 for low LSC17 score groups). In the present study, we aimed to further perform a subgroup analysis confined to the patients receiving allogeneic HCT and determine whether the LSC17 score at leukemia diagnosis was associated with treatment outcomes including OS, leukemia-free survival (LFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse incidence (RI), and acute/chronic GVHD following allogeneic HCT. Methods and patients: Out of 452 patients with available LSC17 scores, 123 patients were included into the final analysis who received allogeneic HCT using matched (n=104, 84.6%) or mismatched/haploidentical donors (n=19, 15.4%). 80 patients were from the previous study (Nature 2016), while 43 patients were a prospectively accrued cohort during 2016-2018. Patients and transplant characteristics were: male/female (n=61/62); median age, 51 (17-73); CR status prior to HCT, CR1 (n=93, 75.6%), CR2 (n=30, 24.4%); Conditioning regimen, reduced intensity/myeloablative conditioning (n=59, 48.0% vs n=64, 52.0%); GVHD prophylaxis using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy; n=45, 36.6%) or T cell depletion (n=62, 50.4%); Cytogenetic risk, favorable (n=10, 8.1%), intermediate (n=70, 56.9%), adverse (n=26, 21.1%), inconclusive or not done (n=17, 13.8%). The LSC17 score for each patient was measured in a diagnostic sample using a NanoString assay and compared to the high/low threshold of a reference AML cohort (Ng et al, Nature 2016 and unpublished data). Transplant outcomes were compared according to the LSC17 risk group for OS, LFS, NRM and RI. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted for OS and LFS using Cox's proportional hazard model or for NRM and RI using Fine-Gray model, respectively. The following variables were included in the model: the LSC17 score group (high vs low LSC17 score), chronic GVHD, CR status (CR2 vs CR1), Cytogenetic risk (adverse vs favorable/intermediate/inconclusive), GVHD prophylaxis (PTCy vs others, T-cell depletion vs others), Age (above 60 vs others), donor type (mismatched/haploidentical vs matched donors). Results: With a median follow-up duration of 22 months among survivors after HCT, 23 patients experienced relapse (n=23, 18.7%) while 63 deaths (51.2%) were noted. Out of 123 patients, 58 (47.1%) had a low LSC17 score and 65 (52.9%) had a high LSC17 score. There was no difference in the distribution of LSC17 scores between the group who received HCT (n=123; 0.479±0.026) vs not (n=229; 0.456±0.019; p=0.491). LFS survival was significantly better in the low LSC17 score group (51.5 vs 32.4% for 2-year LFS rate, p=0.0219), and there was a trend to higher OS rate in the low LSC17 group (48.1%) compared to the high LSC17 group at 2 years (34.2%, p=0.09). Furthermore, patients with a low LSC17 score had a significantly lower RI (14.9% vs 27.3% for 2-year relapse incidence, p=0.028). There is no difference of NRM between the groups (37.2% vs 38.2% at 2 years, p=0.647). Multivariate analysis confirmed that the high LSC17 score group was associated with worse LFS (HR 1.874 [1.080-3.249], p=0.025). However, it was not confirmed with respect to OS or relapse incidence. As expected, it was not associated with NRM. Conclusion: A low 17-gene stemness score is associated with better leukemia-free survival and lower relapse incidence after allogeneic HCT, and is suggested to be associated with OS. The high LSC17 score group may be considered for novel therapeutic strategies to reduce the risk of relapse after allogeneic HCT. Figure Disclosures Chan: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria. Minden:Trillium Therapetuics: Other: licensing agreement. Michelis:CSL Behring: Other: Financial Support. Mattsson:Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Therakos: Honoraria. Wang:Pfizer AG Switzerland: Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodation; Pfizer International: Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodation; Trilium therapeutics: Other: licensing agreement, Research Funding; NanoString: Other: Travel and accommodation.

Background: AML is driven by a small subpopulation of leukemia stem cells (LSCs), which possess stem-cell properties such as quiescence and self-renewal that are linked to therapy resistance and relapse. The LSC17 score was derived from genes differentially expressed between functionally validated LSC+ and LSC- cell fractions from 78 AML patients. The LSC17 score was strongly associated with survival in 4 independent cohorts of AML patients treated with curative intent (n = 908), and accurately predicted initial response. Patients with high LSC17 scores had poor outcomes with standard treatment strategies. The LSC17 score remained highly significant in multivariate analyses, independent of commonly used prognostic factors. A critical advantage of the LSC17 test over cytogenetic analysis is its rapid turnaround time (24-48h on a NanoString platform), providing clinicians with a powerful tool for upfront risk stratification. To date, no RNA-based, stem cell-derived score has been transitioned into a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) certified laboratory. Study design and methods: The study consists of 2 phases. Phase 1 aims to validate the assay in a CLIA certified laboratory setting. Phase 2 aims to determine prospectively the feasibility and prognostic power of LSC17 score testing in newly diagnosed AML patients in the real-world setting. Clinical endpoints include primary induction failure rate, relapse free survival and overall survival. All patients with a suspected diagnosis of de novo or secondary AML, who are deemed fit and appropriate by their treating physician to undergo intensive induction chemotherapy, are considered for this study. Patients who received any prior anti-leukemia treatments (except hydroxyurea) and patients with a confirmed diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia are excluded. Current participating centres include Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (Toronto), Juravinski Cancer Centre (Hamilton), and The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre (Ottawa). Pre-study sample size analysis suggests that 150 patients will be required to demonstrate a hazard ratio for death of 2.3 between patients with a high and low LSC17 score (α = 0.05, power = 0.8). The survival for the high and low LSC17 score groups will be compared using the Cox proportional hazards model. Traditional risk stratification will also be tested within a Cox proportional hazards model. Phase 1 of the study has been completed and several key quality control measures have been created. Initial derivation and validation of the LSC17 score was performed using standard chemistry on the NanoString platform; for CLIA lab validation, the assay was transitioned to Elements© chemistry, which does not require custom codeset manufacture by NanoString. The original AML reference cohort was retested using Elements© chemistry to derive an absolute median threshold for prospective LSC17 score determination in individual patients. The lab validation process compared and found no difference in LSC17 scores between samples processed by Ficoll or collected in Paxgene for ease of processing. A standardised quality assurance (QA) process was completed to identify optimal sample requirements as well as specimen storage conditions, score stability during sample storage and turnaround time for testing. An algorithm has been created using the laboratory information system to allow standardised and rapid calculation of the LSC17 score from NanoString nCounter output data. The LSC17 score can be tested on peripheral blood or bone marrow, although bone marrow samples are preferred for patients with very low peripheral blast counts. Samples are ideally stored in RNA Paxgene tubes for RNA stability and to maximize RNA yield. The prospective phase of the study (Phase 2) opened in April 2018 and as of June 2019, 233 patients have been enrolled, of which 120 received induction chemotherapy. 54 patients were excluded due to an alternative diagnosis or failed QA. The remaining patients had non-intensive therapy based on patient choice. Standard prognostic markers including cytogenetics, molecular studies and targeted sequencing using a 49-gene AML panel are performed in parallel to the LSC17 score. Treatment was administered according to physician preference, based on patient history and results of standard prognostic assays, when available. The study continues to recruit and is open to collaborations in other centres. Disclosures Ng: Celgene: Research Funding. Leber:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Sabloff:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas Pharma Canada: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ASTX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer Canada: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Canada: Research Funding. Minden:Trillium Therapetuics: Other: licensing agreement. Wang:NanoString: Other: Travel and accommodation; Trilium therapeutics: Other: licensing agreement, Research Funding; Pfizer AG Switzerland: Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodation; Pfizer International: Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodation.

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-known complication in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) receiving asparaginase (ASNase) based therapy. The MD Anderson Cancer Centre reported an overall VTE incidence of 29% (14/49) in patients with Philadelphia positive ALL (Ph+ ALL) treated with Hyper-CVAD and in the absence of ASNase (Vu et al. Cancer Medicine. 2015;4(1):27-35. doi:10.1002/cam4.332). The VTE incidence in adult Ph+ ALL patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor plus the pediatric-inspired regimen modified from the Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) ALL protocol remains unclear. We have previously compared the incidence of VTE in adults with Ph+ ALL treated with or without ASNase during the intensification phase of the modified DFCI treatment. This study suggested that patients with Ph+ve ALL experience high incidence of VTE, even in the absence of ASNase, and that this risk is not restricted to the intensification phase. As ASNase was omitted from the protocol due to toxicity since 2008, in this report, we provide further insight into the risk of VTE in adults with Ph+ ALL during the entire ASNase-free DFCI treatment course. Methods: A single-institution retrospective review of sequential Ph+ ALL patients treated at Princess Margaret Cancer Center (PMCC) from 2008-2018 with an imatinib-containing DFCI protocol-based regimen that omitted ASNase. VTE events were recorded from the time of diagnosis to the end of modified DFCI treatment, including at the time of allogenic bone marrow transplantation. Co-variants of age, sex, weight, BMI, Padua score, white blood cell count, and platelet count were also collected. Statistical analyses were performed using the 2-tailed t test. Results: Overall, 130 patients were included for analysis; none received prophylactic anticoagulation. Among the 130 Ph+ ALL patients treated with the modified DFCI protocol, 28 (21.5%) patients had at least 1 VTE events from diagnosis to the end of treatment. The mean age of patients with and without VTE were 56.8 and 49.0 years, respectively (p=0.014) (Table 1). The majority of the VTE events occurred during active treatment, with 9 (7.0%), 11 (8.5%), and 4 (3.1%) occurring during induction, intensification, and maintenance, respectively (Figure 1). Only four patients (3.1%) presented with VTE at the time of diagnosis. Of all VTE events, 14 (50%) were DVT and/or PE, 12 (43%) were line-related, and 2 (7%) involved a cardiac thrombus (Table 2). The average Padua score for these patients was 5.4 with a range of 3-10. All VTE events were treated with low weight molecular heparin (LMWH), with 2 patients experiencing a recurrent episode within a year while on LMWH treatment. Bleeding following anticoagulation was rare. One patient experienced a major bleeding into the psoas muscle while on LMWH plus platelet transfusion for a right atrial clot during the induction phase in ICU. No other significant bleeding event was observed. Conclusion: VTE was observed in more than 20% of adults with Ph+ ALL patients treated with imatinib plus a modified DFCI pediatric ALL protocol. The majority of VTE events occurred during active treatment (induction and intensification), and DVT/PE incidence was similar to that of line-related thrombosis. The high observed VTE incidence suggests that prophylactic anticoagulation should be considered for adult patients with Ph+ ALL even in ASNase-free regimens, especially if additional thromboembolic risk factors are present. Disclosures Maze: Pfizer Inc: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chan:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria; AbbVie Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Gupta:Sierra Oncology: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding. Yee:Novartis, Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas, Celgene, Otsuka, Shire, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agensys, Astex, Hoffman La Roche, MedImmune, Merck, Millenium, Roche/Genentech: Research Funding. Minden:Trillium Therapetuics: Other: licensing agreement. Schimmer:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Otsuka Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Medivir Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Schuh:Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva Canada Innovation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. McNamara:Novartis Pharmaceutical Canada Inc.: Consultancy.

Mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) is a heterogeneous disease consisting of acute leukemia expressing markers of both myeloid and lymphoid lineage. The role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) remains uncertain due to lack of prospective trials . Several studies have retrospectively examined its role in pediatric and younger adult subgroups. Myeloablative conditioning (MAC) can result in an overall survival (OS) of 56% at 3 years, but is not suitable for older and frail patients. With expanding transplant availability and alternative donors, we sought to evaluate the outcomes of our cohort of MPAL patients, including older adults unfit for MAC, in a heterogeneous, real-world scenario compared with the outcomes of patients who were consolidated with chemotherapy only. Methods: Seventy four patients, aged 18 years or older, at the Princess Margaret Cancer Center between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2018 were evaluated. All patients included in analysis met the WHO 2016 classification criteria for MPAL. Overall survival and relapse free survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. The log-rank test was used to compare the two groups with respect to OS and relapse free survival. Results: Baseline characteristics of the patient cohorts are shown in Table 1. Among the 74 MPAL patients included in this study, 59 (79%) received induction chemotherapy. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 47 (79%) treated patients. Twenty-five of 36(80%) achieved a CR using ALL protocols (DFCI Protocol, Hyper-CVAD), while 9 of 23 (39%) achieved a CR using AML protocols (3+7, FLAG-Ida). Consolidation treatment post CR was evenly split, with 24(51%) receiving chemotherapy followed by an alloHSCT and 23 (49%) receiving chemotherapy only. In the alloHSCT group, RIC was used in 20 (81%) patients while MAC was used in four younger patients with a median age of 51 and 30 respectively. Donor types included sixteen matched unrelated donors, five sibling donors, two haploidentical donors, and one double umbilical cord. The median age of the transplant cohort was 50 years with a median OS of 21 months. In the chemotherapy only group, the median age was 57 with a median OS of 18 months. ALL-type treatment was used for consolidation in 74% of patients with 83% using the asparaginase-containing DFCI protocol. Univariate analysis demonstrated no difference in outcomes with several parameters including age, induction chemotherapy, donor source, and conditioning intensity. The sole predictor of poor OS on univariate analysis was acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) with a hazard ratio of 3.3 (95% CI 0.9-11). In total, 12 patients (50%) had aGVHD with a median OS of 16 months. However, when Grade 1/2 and Grade 3/4 aGVHD were compared, median OS was not reached in patients with G1/2, compared with an OS of 11 months in those patients with G3/4 aGVHD. Chronic GVHD was present in 6 patients and did not impact OS (HR 0.9892 CI 95% 0.2-2.9). Post-transplant relapses occurred solely in the RIC group and were early, occurring within a median of 124 days (range 87-188). Although, there was no relapses in the MAC group, the non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 75%, with patients dying from either aGVHD or infection. The NRM in the RIC group was 17.65%. The 3 year OS and relapse free survival (RFS) for the entire cohort were 30% and 32%, respectively. When comparing those patients that had undergone alloSCT and those that who received chemo alone, survival in the two groups were similar with a 1 year OS of 75% vs. 68% and a 3 year OS of 29% vs 32%, respectively (Figure 1). The 3 year RFS was also similar at 29% and 34%, respectively. Subgroup analysis between the two groups was performed for patients with specific poor prognostic factors (older age, complex cytogenetics, higher WCC, conditioning regimen used), but results showed no significant survival differences. Conclusions Older patients with MPAL have an inferior prognosis and worse outcomes with alloHSCT compared with those of younger adults or children. Despite the increase in access to alloHSCT and an expanding pool of alternative donors, outcomes with RIC remain similar to consolidation with chemotherapy alone. There may be some evidence to suggest that the graft versus leukemia effect can be harnessed to improve outcomes in selected patients. Further research towards optimizing patient outcomes is clearly required to address the needs of older patients unfit for MAC. Disclosures Gupta: Sierra Oncology: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mattsson:Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Therakos: Honoraria. Maze:Pfizer Inc: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Michelis:CSL Behring: Other: Financial Support. McNamara:Novartis Pharmaceutical Canada Inc.: Consultancy. Schimmer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Otsuka Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Medivir Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Schuh:Teva Canada Innovation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva Canada Innovation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yee:Astex: Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Hoffman La Roche: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Research Funding; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Research Funding. Minden:Trillium Therapetuics: Other: licensing agreement.

Introduction: The introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has expedited the discovery of novel genetic lesions in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), thereby allowing better risk stratification with respect to overall survival (OS). We have previously reported that AML patients with PTPN11 and NPM1 mutations had longer OS following chemotherapy, while those carrying mutations in ASXL1, JAK2, RUNX1, TP53 and SRSF2 had a shorter OS (Daher-Reyes,ASH 2018). Little is known, however, regarding the impact of genetic profiles (somatic mutations and cytogenetic abnormalities) at initial AML diagnosis on the treatment outcomes following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Methods & Patients: We enrolled AML patients who had available NGS data at time of initial diagnosis as part of the AGILE project between February 2015 and December 2018, and who subsequently underwent allogeneic HCT. NGS was performed on DNA samples isolated from peripheral blood or bone marrow samples at diagnosis. Analysis was performed using the TruSight Myeloid Sequencing Panel on the MiSeq sequencer (Illumina; San Diego, CA). Transplant outcomes (overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), relapse incidence (RI), and non-relapse mortality (NRM)) after HCT were compared according to genetic profiles defined at diagnosis. Survival analysis for OS and RFS was performed using Cox's proportional hazard model, while the Fine-Gray model was used for RI and NRM analyses. Variables considered in the model included CR status prior to HCT (CR1 vs. beyond CR1), de novo AML (vs. secondary/therapy-related AML), induction chemotherapy used (3+7 vs. others), conditioning regimen (myeloablative vs. reduced intensity), WBC, age, donor type, mutation status of commonly mutated genes, and the composite adverse genetic profile (defined as having at least one of monosomal karyotype (MK), TP53 mutation, del(5), complex karyotype (CK), and monosomy 7), given that these 5 features were highly co-occurring, adverse prognostic factors (Figure 1A). Results: We identified 435 patients in whom frontline NGS was performed, of whom a total of 178 patients (40.9%) received HCT and were included in the final analysis. A total of 598 (median 4, IQR 2-5) mutations were identified in 165 patients (n=165/178, 92.7%). Among 54 genes in the panel, 12 genes were mutated in more than 10% of the cohort, with the most commonly mutated genes being DNMT3A (30.3%), TET2 (25.3%), NPM1 (22.5%), RUNX1 (18.5%), IDH2 (16.9%), FLT3 (15.7%), ASXL1 (12.4%), BCOR (12.4%), CEBPA (11.2%), NRAS (11.2%), IDH1 (10.1%), and SRSF2 (10.1%). In univariate analysis, the groups with a composite adverse genetic profile (n=30/178, 16.9%) showed decreased OS (HR 2.19 [1.30-3.67]; p=0.003), while patients harbouring spliceosome gene (SF3B1, SRSF2, U2AF1, and ZRSR2) mutations (n=37/178, 20.8%) had longer OS (HR 0.39 [0.18-0.85]; p=0.018), with 2-year OS rates of 24.9% and 57.9%, respectively (p=0.002)) (Figure 1B). The composite adverse genetic profile was also associated with shorter RFS (HR 2.23 [1.34-3.69]; p=0.002), while spliceosome gene mutations were associated with longer RFS (HR 0.42 [0.20-0.88]; p=0.022), with 2-year RFS rates of 23.7% vs. 57.9%, respectively (p=0.001)). The composite adverse genetic profile was also associated with higher RI (HR 2.94 [1.52-5.66]; p=0.001), with 2-year RI rates of 47.2% vs. 17.2%, respectively, for patients with and without adverse genetic features (p=0.002) (Figure 1C). Neither the composite adverse genetic profile, nor spliceosome gene mutations, were associated with NRM, with HR of 1.21 [0.55-2.65], p=0.64) and 0.45 [0.16-1.31], p=0.15, respectively (Figure 1D). Multivariate analyses confirmed that the composite adverse genetic profile and spliceosome gene mutations were independent prognostic factors for OS, RFS, and RI (p=0.004, p=0.002, and p=0.001, respectively) and for OS and RFS (p=0.020 and p=0.022, respectively). Conclusion: In our cohort, the composite adverse genetic profile (i.e. having at least one of MK, TP53 mutation, del(5), CK and monosomy 7 remained as a poor prognostic factor even after allogeneic HCT. To clarify the role of genetic risk stratification in HCT, further analysis using a larger cohort is warranted. In addition, a comparative analysis between HCT vs no-HCT groups according to the genetic profile, is ongoing in a in a larger patient cohort. Figure 1 Disclosures Michelis: CSL Behring: Other: Financial Support. Mattsson:Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Therakos: Honoraria. Schimmer:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Otsuka Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Medivir Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. McNamara:Novartis Pharmaceutical Canada Inc.: Consultancy. Maze:Pfizer Inc: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gupta:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sierra Oncology: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Yee:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding; Hoffman La Roche: Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Minden:Trillium Therapetuics: Other: licensing agreement. Schuh:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Honoraria; Teva Canada Innovation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Introduction: Although induction chemotherapy results in a complete remission (CR) in ~70% of newly diagnosed AML patients, post-remission therapies are needed to eliminate minimal residual disease (MRD) and prevent relapse. Consolidation chemotherapy, either as definitive therapy or bridge to bone marrow transplantation (BMT), is currently the most common form of post-remission therapy. Yet, our understanding of its impact on MRD remains limited. In this study, we investigated the effects of consolidation chemotherapy on molecular MRD (mMRD) burden using ultra-deep next generation sequencing (NGS) and correlated treatment response with disease characteristics and survival outcomes in AML patients. Patients and Methods: 91 newly diagnosed AML patients who achieved CR following standard induction chemotherapy were evaluated. Targeted conventional NGS using a 54-gene panel was performed on whole blood (PB) or bone marrow samples collected at diagnosis. PB samples were collected during remission at two consecutive time points (T1 and T2), before and after 1 (n=79) or 2 (n=12) cycles of consolidation chemotherapy, for each patient. To detect mMRD, we used a custom 37-gene hybrid-capture panel and error-corrected NGS based on the duplex sequencing approach with a variant allele frequency (VAF) detection limit of ~1x10-4. For 10 patients, we also performed duplex sequencing analysis on their relapsed samples. Results: NGS of the diagnostic samples identified a total of 298 putative oncogenic mutations in 92% (n=84) of the 91 patients. Ninety percent of these mutations (n=267) were trackable by the custom hybrid-capture panel. Duplex sequencing detected persistence of 56% (n=149) of the trackable mutations in T1 samples; 34% (n=50) of which were clonal hematopoiesis-associated DTA mutations (those involving DNMT3A, TET2, or ASXL1), and the remaining 66% (n=99) were non-DTA mutations. Analysis of T2 samples showed that consolidation chemotherapy reduced the VAF of non-DTA mutations by a median of 73% and cleared 27% (n=27) of them at T2. In contrast, the burden of DTA mutations increased by 0.5% (P < 0.0001 by Mann-Whitney test), and only 2% (n=1) of the mutations was cleared (P = 0.0001 by Fisher's exact test). These findings are consistent with prior studies demonstrating that non-DTA mutations are more reliable markers of leukemic burden than DTA mutations. To study the impact of consolidation chemotherapy at the level of individual patients, the mean VAF of all persistent non-DTA mutations was calculated for each sample and used as a composite measure of mMRD burden (henceforth referred to as "cmMRD"). Analysis of the 10 patients with relapsed samples showed that cmMRD levels tracked well with achievement of remission and disease progression (Fig. 1). In the subset of patients with persistent non-DTA mutations at T1 (n=61), consolidation chemotherapy decreased cmMRD levels by a median of 36% at T2. However, we observed high interpatient variability (Fig. 2); 36% (n=22) of the patients experienced an increase in cmMRD burden after consolidation chemotherapy, and 36% (n=22) had less than a 1 log reduction. Only 28% (n=17) of the patients achieved a log reduction of greater than 1. The likelihood and magnitude of cmMRD response were significantly associated with cytogenetic risk (P = 0.026 by 3x3 Chi-square test; Fig. 3). The proportion of patients with favorable, intermediate, and poor-risk cytogenetics who experienced cmMRD expansion was 17%, 27%, and 71%, respectively. Consistent with these findings, a suboptimal response (defined as cmMRD ratio [T2/T1] > 0.4) was associated with inferior overall survival (HR = 3.29, P = 0.007 by log-rank test; Fig. 4). Conclusions: Our analysis showed that mMRD response to consolidation chemotherapy was highly variable among patients. Although consolidation chemotherapy was effective in deepening the remission for a subset of patients, it failed to lower MRD levels for a substantial proportion of patients, especially those with poor risk cytogenetics. These findings challenge the practice of using consolidation chemotherapy to achieve a deeper remission prior to BMT for high-risk patients and indicate that the opposite outcome may occur instead. NGS-based monitoring of mMRD can potentially be used to distinguish between patients who can remain on consolidation chemotherapy as definitive therapy and those who require a switch in post-remission therapy. Disclosures Gupta: Sierra Oncology: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding. Maze:Pfizer Inc: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. McNamara:Novartis Pharmaceutical Canada Inc.: Consultancy. Minden:Trillium Therapetuics: Other: licensing agreement. Schimmer:Medivir Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Otsuka Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Schuh:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva Canada Innovation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yee:Novartis, Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas, Celgene, Otsuka, Shire, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agensys, Astex, Hoffman La Roche, MedImmune, Merck, Millenium, Roche/Genentech: Research Funding. Bratman:SVB: Other: is co-inventor of a patent relating to circulating tumor DNA detection technology, which has been licensed to Roche Molecular Diagnostics.. Chan:Agios: Honoraria; AbbVie Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Introduction Core-binding factor (CBF) acute myeloid leukemias (AML) are characterized by the chromosomal abnormalities t(8;21) or inv(16)/t(16;16) and their fusion proteins RUNX1/RUNX1T1 and CBFB-MYH11, respectively. Despite their relatively favorable prognosis, it has been reported that up to 45% of patients with CBF-AML relapse. Current guidelines recommend monitoring the peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM) for molecular evidence of residual disease (RD) every 3 months for 2 years following remission. By monitoring patients for rising molecular transcripts, those at risk of impending relapse can be identified and treated prior to the emergence of overt disease. However, the relapse kinetics of CBF-AML are poorly-understood, and it is unknown if serial RD monitoring can detect molecular relapses with sufficient lead-time to intervene and prevent morphologic relapse. Methods After local REB approval, we identified patients with CBF-AML treated at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto, Canada between 2000 and 2017. Patients underwent induction and consolidation chemotherapy according to standard protocols followed by RD monitoring with polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) of RUNX1/RUNX1T1 or CBFB-MYH11 transcripts in a CAP/CLIA certified lab every 3 months for a median of 1.2 years (range 0-5.3). RD assessment was performed on BM aspirates, but PB could be tested in patients who could not tolerate repeat BM aspirates. Morphologic relapse was defined as emergence of >5% blasts in the PB or BM, and molecular relapse as a positive transcript PCR (if previous PCR measurements were undetectable) or an increase by 1 log (if previous PCR measurements were detectable) on 2 successive samples without morphologic relapse. Rapid relapse was defined as Results We included 114 patients with CBF-AML. Median age was 46.5 years (range 18-79). t(8;21) was present in 59% and inv(16)/t(16;16) in 41% of patients. All patients achieved remission with 7+3 induction chemotherapy. Over a median follow-up time of 3.7 years (range 0.2-14.3), RD measurements were performed a mean of 5 times per patient with mean sampling interval of 103±54 days. Remission was maintained in 71 (62%) patients but 43 (38%) developed morphological (n=34) or isolated molecular relapse (n=9), with median time to relapse of 4.4 months (range 1.4-31.4). Patients with relapsed disease were significantly less likely to have achieved ≥3 log reduction in RUNX1/RUNX1T1 or CBFB-MYH11 BM transcripts at the end of consolidation chemotherapy compared to patients who remained in remission (75% vs 90%, p=0.046). Of the 43 patients who relapsed, the majority (74.4%, n=32) had rapid relapse kinetics. Of these 43 patients, 25 received reinduction chemotherapy with achievement of CR2, 6 had refractory disease or death, 1 was lost to follow-up, and 17 went on to receive allotransplantation. RD monitoring enabled timely detection of impending relapse and permitted intervention prior to morphologic relapse in only 11 patients (25.6%). Among these 11 patients with slower relapse kinetics, 6 received reinduction chemotherapy with achievement of CR2, 2 received reinduction chemotherapy with refractory disease, and 8 went on to receive allotransplantation. Median overall survival was 20 months (range 3-128) for patients with rapid relapse kinetics and 28 months (range 14-166) for patients with slow relapse kinetics (p=0.02). Clinical features, BM vs PB RD measurements, additional molecular mutations, and cytogenetic abnormalities did not distinguish patients with rapid vs slow relapse kinetics. Conclusions Current guidelines recommend molecular RD monitoring every 3 months for CBF-AML. However, in the majority of patients who relapsed at our institution, RD monitoring every 3 months provided insufficient lead-time to identify molecular relapses prior to morphologic relapse. Further research is warranted to identify the patients with CBF at the highest risk of relapse and the best strategies to monitor these patients over time. Disclosures Gupta: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Maze:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Schuh:Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy; Teva: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy. Yee:Celgene, Novartis, Otsuka: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agensys, Astex, GSK, Onconova, Genentech/Roche: Research Funding. Schimmer:Otsuka Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Medivir AB: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-known complication in adults receiving asparaginase (ASNase)-based intensification chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The optimal preventative strategy is unclear. We previously reported high thrombosis rates during intensification without VTE prophylaxis. Our objective is to determine the effects of weight-adjusted enoxaparin as primary VTE prophylaxis in ambulatory adults receiving ASNase-based intensification chemotherapy for ALL. Methods Patients who achieved complete remission following induction from 2011-2017 went on to receive ASNase-based intensification on the Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) 91-01 protocol. Patients already on therapeutic anticoagulation for prior VTE were excluded. VTE prophylaxis commenced on day 1, cycle 1 of intensification until the completion of the entire 21-30 week. From 2011 to 2014 patients received enoxaparin subcutaneously once daily, at a dose of 40 mg for patients weighing less than 80 kg, and 60 mg for those 80 kg and over for the first 3 years. Due to continuing occurrence of VTE from 2014-2017 patients received an escalated dose aiming at 1mg/kg daily (rounded to the nearest 20 mg). Results were compared to an historical patient cohort that received the same regimen without VTE prophylaxis prior to 2011. Result: In our historical cohort of adult ALL that did not receive prophylactic anticoagulation (n=99), the rate of VTE was 27%. 124 patients received one of the above prophylactic anticoagulation schedules. The treated and control groups did not differ with respect to median age, gender, weight and number of ASNase treatment cycles per patient. 16 of 124 patients (12.9 %) in the prophylaxis groups developed symptomatic VTE. Sites of VTE in the prophylaxis group included lower extremity (10), sagittal sinus (2), subclavian line related (3), and pulmonary embolism (4). There were no major bleeding complications observed in the prophylaxis group. In the first patient cohort (n=42), receiving fixed enoxaparin doses of 40 or 60 mg, dosing ranged from 0.39-0.69 mg/kg. The mean enoxaparin dose administered was 0.57 mg/kg. Seven (16.6 %) developed a symptomatic VTE, which was not significantly different from the historical non-prophylaxis cohort. In the second patient cohort (n=82), all patients received weight-adjusted enoxaparin > 0.7 mg/kg of enoxaparin. The mean enoxaparin dose administered was 0.88 mg/kg. Nine of 82 patients (10.9 %)) in this cohort had a symptomatic VTE, which was lower than the historical cohort (OR = 0.33 {95% CI, 0.15-0.77} and P< 0.01). Conclusions: Weight-adjusted enoxaparin prophylaxis targeting 1 mg/kg/day reduced the incidence of symptomatic VTE in adult ALL patients receiving intensification chemotherapy with ASNase. This treatment is a viable VTE prevention option with no documented major bleeding. Disclosures Schimmer: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Otsuka Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Medivir AB: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Schuh:Teva: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy. Maze:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Yee:Celgene, Novartis, Otsuka: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agensys, Astex, GSK, Onconova, Genentech/Roche: Research Funding. Gupta:Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Brandwein:Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Lundbeck: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Introduction:Induction chemotherapy debulks the leukemic burden in AML patients. Blood count recovery usually occurs during the fourth week of starting chemotherapy in patients who achieve a morphologic remission in bone marrow. However, a subset of patients experience significantly delayed recovery. The relevance of delayed recovery on long-term clinical outcomes and its contributing factors have not been well studied. Specifically, the association between recurrent mutations in AML and hematologic recovery is unknown. Methods:We studied a total of 262 newly diagnosed adult AML patients treated between September 2014 and December 2017 at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre who achieved a complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) after one cycle of induction chemotherapy. The regimens consisted of 3+7 (N=194) and FLAG-IDA (N=68). We collected information on disease characteristics and blood count results at baseline and during chemotherapy. Mutation profiling of diagnostic samples was performed using a 54-gene next generation sequencing panel (TruSight Myeloid Sequencing Panel, Illumina). Detection of persistent mutations in remission samples was performed using a custom 37-gene duplex sequencing platform with a lower detection limit of ~0.05% variant allele frequency (VAF). Results:Of the cohort of 262 patients, 256 patients (97.7%) achieved neutrophil recovery (defined as > 1x109/L), with time to recovery ranging from 17 to 84 days. Two hundred forty-four (93.1%) patients achieved platelet recovery (defined as > 100x109/L); time to recovery ranged from 17 to 117 days. The percentage of patients who achieved neutrophil and platelet count recovery before day 35 was 82.4% and 84.0% respectively (Fig. 1). To evaluate the prognostic significance of delayed recovery, we categorized patients who achieved CR into two groups, "normal" or "delayed" recovery, according to whether they achieved recovery before or after day 35, respectively. Relapse-free survival (RFS) of patients with delayed recovery was significantly worse than those with normal recovery and only marginally better than those with CRi (P=0.02; Fig. 2). Analysis restricted to 3+7 treated patients showed the same trend (P=0.02), excluding the possibility that the inferior outcome was due to treatment of higher risk patients with more intensive regimens. To study the factors associated with delayed recovery, we performed multivariable Cox regression analysis that included clinical factors and mutations identified at the time of diagnosis as covariates. Four factors were found to be independently correlated with delayed recovery: treatment with FLAG-IDA, truncating ASXL1mutations, SRSF2mutations, and DNMT3AR882 mutations (Table 1). Because FLAG-IDA is the preferred frontline regimen for higher risk patients at our institution, we performed a secondary analysis restricted to patients treated with 3+7 to exclude chemotherapy regimen as a potential confounding variable. This analysis identified six independent factors: AML with myelodysplasia-related changes, lower hemoglobin levels at presentation, truncating ASXL1mutations, TET2mutations, CEBPAmutations, and DNMT3AR882 mutations (Table 1). Somatic mutations in DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1, and SRSF2(DTAS) mutations are associated with preleukemic conditions, such as myelodysplastic syndrome and age-related clonal hematopoiesis, and frequently persist in remission. These mutations are acquired in hematopoietic stem cells resulting in their propagation to progenitors and terminally differentiated blood cells. We hypothesized that the persistence of DTAS mutations in progenitors might compromise their capacity for reconstitution of normal hematopoiesis resulting in delayed recovery. To test this hypothesis, we performed duplex sequencing on peripheral blood DNA samples collected from a random subset of 43 patients during remission. The detection of DTAS mutations in remission above a VAF of 2% was strongly associated with delayed recovery (P=0.0004; Fig. 3). Conclusion:Delayed hematologic recovery in AML patients after induction chemotherapy is associated with inferior RFS and persistence of preleukemic mutations (i.e., DTAS mutations). Our results support a model in which progenitors harboring DTAS mutations have reduced repopulation capacity leading to delayed hematologic recovery after induction chemotherapy. Disclosures Gupta: Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Schimmer:Otsuka Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medivir AB: Research Funding. Yee:Agensys, Astex, GSK, Onconova, Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Celgene, Novartis, Otsuka: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maze:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bratman:Roche: Other: SVB is a co-inventor on a patent describing methods for circulating tumor DNA analysis, which has been licensed to Roche Molecular Diagnostics.. Schuh:Shire: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Teva: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy.

Acute coronary syndrome is associated with intracoronary thrombosis secondary to platelet activation. Previous groups have investigated platelet activation in both stable and unstable vascular disease. Most measures of platelet activation are not routinely available or easily adaptable to large scale clinical use. Recently, measurement of the mean platelet component (MPC) has become part of the routine data provided by an automated full blood count analyser, the Advia 120. MPC measures platelet density which changes on platelet activation. Our objectives were to determine if platelet activation, as measured by MPC, is increased in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and to determine if MPC could be useful in differentiating people with stable CAD from controls on an everyday clinical basis. Three hundred and forty-five consecutive patients attending for elective coronary angiography had full blood count analysis and MPC measurement performed using an ADVIA-120 analyser. Three hundred and twenty-four were analysed in our final dataset. Two hundred and fifty-three (78%) had CAD. Patients with CAD were significantly (p