Search

Purpose: To study and compare the outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with the internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in the eyes with recalcitrant diabetic macular edema (DME) with and without vitreomacular traction. Methods: A comparative prospective interventional study was undertaken in which group 1 included 45 eyes of 45 patients with DME with vitreomacular tractional component and group 2 included 45 eyes of 45 patients with recalcitrant DME without a tractional component. Both groups underwent standard PPV with ILM peeling. All the patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months. The parameters evaluated were changes in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) parameters, and occurrence of any intraoperative/postoperative surgical complication. Results: The mean CMT improved significantly from 540.6 and 490.2 µm at the baseline to 292.5 and 270.6 µm at 6 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < 0.001). The mean BCVA logMAR improved from 0.78 ± 0.21 to 0.62 ± 0.22 in group 1 and 0.84 ± 0.19 to 0.65 ± 0.21 in group 2 at 6 months follow-up which was not statistically significant. The improvement in the mfERG was seen in group 2 as a significant increase in P1 wave amplitude in ring 2 (2-5°) (P < 0.004) and a significant decrease in P 1 wave implicit time in ring 1 (central 2°) (P < 0.001). None of the eyes suffered from the loss of BCVA or any major surgical complication in either group. Conclusion: PPV in recalcitrant DME provides good anatomical outcomes and the results are comparable in DME with and without a tractional component. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) outcomes in cases with tractional diabetic macular edema (tDME). Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study with a follow-up of 12 months. Forty-six eyes with tDME of 38 patients submitted to PPV between 2013 and 2015 were assessed. A standard PPV was performed and surgical outcomes were registered at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. Results: The baseline median best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) letters and the median central foveal thickness (CFT) were 43.0 letters and 491.0 µm, respectively. At the 12-month follow-up, a median decrease in CFT of 232.7 µm was observed. A CFT < 300 µm was achieved in 65.2% of the cases (52.2% needing no further treatment); a BCVA improvement by ≥10 letters was achieved in 60.0%, but there was a decrease of ≥10 letters in 13.0% of the cases. DME recurrence was observed in 10.9% of the cases, with a median time of development after vitrectomy of 6 months. As a major postoperative complication, a macular hole was observed in 1 patient (2.1%). Conclusions: In our series, PPV for tDME induced an improvement in retinal thickening and visual outcome in more than 50% of the cases, with low recurrence rates and a low number of postoperative complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of this study was to define a new pathogenetic classification of diabetic macular edema (DME) and to present the results of its application in common clinical practice. Methods: One hundred and seventy-seven consecutive patients with center-involving DME, central retinal thickness (CRT) ≥250 µm, were prospectively enrolled. A complete ophthalmological examination included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) assessment, fundus photography, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). The DME classification was broken down into 4 categories, combining the presence of retinal thickening with the presence/absence of visible vascular dilations and OCT-detectable macular traction. The OCT parameters included were as follows: CRT, subretinal fluid, intraretinal cysts, and hyper- reflective foci (HF). Results: Four subtypes of DME were identified: vasogenic (131 eyes, DME with vascular dilation), nonvasogenic (46 eyes, DME without vascular dilation), tractional (11 eyes), and mixed DME (13 eyes). Vasogenic DME was the pattern mainly represented in each subclass of CRT (< 300, 300–400, and > 400 µm), with tractional DME observed especially with CRT > 400 µm. Internal and external cysts and a greater presence of hard exudates were predominantly found in vasogenic DME, whereas HF was equally distributed in the 4 DME subgroups. Conclusion: The study offers a new pathogenetic classification able to detect significant differences among DME subtypes. A tailored therapeutic approach could take into consideration specific changes associated with the different DME subtypes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate changes in subfoveal choroidal thickness (SCT) in cases of tractional diabetic macular edema (DME) after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV)., Methods: This prospective study included 31 eyes of 31 patients who underwent PPV for the management of tractional DME. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), SCT, and central macular thickness (CMT) were measured before the operation, as well as one, three, and six months following the surgery in the operated eyes and at baseline, as well as six months in the fellow eyes., Results: The SCT decline in eyes with tractional DME was statistically significant six months postoperatively (P = 0.009). A statistically significant decline was observed in the CMT values one, three, and six months postoperatively in eyes with tractional DME (P = 0.02, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). There was a statistically significant improvement in the visual acuity of the affected eyes three (P = 0.047) and six months (P = 0.017) postoperatively., Conclusion: After PPV for the treatment of tractional DME, a statistically significant decrease in the CMT values is detectable from the first month after surgery, followed by the improvement of BCVA from the third month. It is worth mentioning that a decrease was found in the SCT six months postoperatively.

Purpose: To evaluate the 1-year results of vitrectomy performed in combination with intraoperative dexamethasone implant for tractional and nontractional refractory diabetic macular edema (DME)., Methods: Thirteen eyes from 13 subjects who were diagnosed with tractional DME and 17 eyes from 17 subjects who were diagnosed with nontractional refractory DME underwent vitrectomy and dexamethasone implant injection. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) during the one year following vitrectomy were evaluated in each group. Additionally, changes in intraocular pressure and other complications were investigated postoperatively., Results: In eyes with tractional DME, a statistically significant improvement in BCVA was noted at 3, 6, and 12 months, and a statistically significant improvement in CMT was noted at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months from baseline after vitrectomy ( p < 0.05). In eyes with nontractional refractory DME, a statistically significant improvement in BCVA was noted at 12 months, but there were no significant improvements in CMT despite the tendency to decrease from baseline. Sixteen (53.3%) of the 30 eyes included in this study showed intraocular pressure elevation, which was addressed using antiglaucoma medication, and there were no other severe complications., Conclusions: Vitrectomy combined with intraoperative dexamethasone implant may be safe and effective in treating DME, especially tractional DME. In this study, patients with nontractional DME required more additional treatments and time for anatomical and functional improvement compared to patients with tractional DME., Competing Interests: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported., (© 2019 The Korean Ophthalmological Society.)