Search

Background Streptococci are a common cause of infective endocarditis (IE). We aimed to evaluate the performance of the HANDOC score to identify patients at high risk for IE and the Duke clinical criteria of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC; 2015 and 2023 versions) and the 2023 version from the International Society of Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) in diagnosing IE among patients with streptococcal bacteremia. Methods This retrospective study included adult patients with streptococcal bacteremia hospitalized at Lausanne University Hospital. Episodes were classified as IE by the Endocarditis Team. A HANDOC score >2 classified patients as high risk for IE. Results Among 851 episodes with streptococcal bacteremia, IE was diagnosed in 171 episodes (20%). Among 607 episodes with non-β-hemolytic streptococci, 213 (35%) had HANDOC scores >2 points; 132 (22%) had IE. The sensitivity of the HANDOC score to identify episodes at high risk for IE was 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90%–98%), the specificity 82% (95% CI, 78%–85%), and the negative predictive value (NPV) 98% (95% CI, 96%–99%). 2015 Duke-ESC, 2023 Duke-ISCVID, and 2023 Duke-ESC clinical criteria classified 114 (13%), 145 (17%), and 126 (15%) episodes as definite IE, respectively. Sensitivity (95% CI) for the 2015 Duke-ESC, 2023 Duke-ISCVID, and 2023 Duke-ESC clinical criteria was calculated at 65% (57%–72%), 81% (74%–86%), and 73% (65%–79%), respectively, with specificity (95% CI) at 100% (98%–100%), 99% (98%–100%), and 99% (98%–100%), respectively. Conclusions The HANDOC score showed an excellent NPV to identify episodes at high risk for IE. Among the different versions of the Duke criteria, the 2023 Duke-ISCVID version fared better for the diagnosis of IE among streptococcal bacteremia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Dexmedetomidine, an alpha-2 agonist, is used as an adjunct to anesthesia in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs. One of its advantages is the opioid-sparing effect which can facilitate early extubation and recovery. When the ERAS cardiac society was set in 2017, our facility was already using the ERAS program, in which the "fast-track Anesthesia" was facilitated by the intraoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine. Our objective is to share our experience and investigate the potential impact of intraoperative dexmedetomidine use as a part of the ERAS program on patient outcomes in elective cardiac surgery. Materials and Methods: An observational retrospective cohort study was conducted at a university hospital in Switzerland. The patients who underwent elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass between 1 June 2017 and 31 August 2018 were included in this analysis (n = 327). Regardless of the surgery type, all the patients received a standardized fast-track anesthesia protocol inclusive of dexmedetomidine infusion, reduced opioid dose, and parasternal nerve block. The primary outcome was the postoperative time when the criteria for extubation were met. Three groups were identified: group 0—(extubated in the operating room), group < 6 (extubated in less than 6 h), and group > 6 (extubated in >6 h). The secondary outcomes were adverse events, length of stay in ICU and in hospital, and total hospitalization costs. Results: Dexmedetomidine was well-tolerated, with no significant adverse events reported. Early extubation was performed in 187 patients (57%). Group 3 had a significantly longer length of stay in the ICU (median: 70 h vs. 25 h) and in hospital (17 vs. 12 days), and consequently higher total hospitalization costs (CHF 62,551 vs. 38,433) compared to the net data from the other two groups (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that dexmedetomidine can be safely used as part of the opioid-sparing anesthesia protocol in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass with the potential to facilitate early extubation, shorter ICU and hospital stays, and reduced hospitalization costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Mitral valve repair is the current standard approach for mitral valve regurgitation. However, patients suffering from functional mitral regurgitation have a significant risk of recurrent regurgitation. Adjustable mitral rings may provide a solution for this adverse event. Methods: A single-center, first-in-man clinical study was performed on patients suffering from mitral valve regurgitation. Patients were implanted with the study ring and followed for six months. A balloon catheter can be inserted into the study ring frame at any time after implantation and inflated independently in the areas P1, P2, or P3, which reduces the anterior-posterior diameter. Results: Five patients (75.4 ± 6.1 years; EuroSCORE II 2.1 ± 0.9%; three female) were successfully implanted. Mechanisms of mitral regurgitation were prolapse of the P2-segment in three patients and annular dilation in two patients. Surgical implantation according to the protocol was feasible and is described herein. Median cardiopulmonary bypass time and cross clamp time were 105 (118; 195) and 94 (90; 151) min, respectively. The median intensive care unit stay was 2 (2; 3) days. No perioperative, 30-day, or 6-month mortality was observed, and the repair was stable without residual or recurrent regurgitation ≥ grade 2. All patients reached the primary endpoint without device-related morbidity. Conclusions: Successful implantation was completed in five patients without device-related adverse events. Ring implantation was safe and feasible for all patients. The opportunity of post-implant adjustment to improve leaflet coaptation is a promising new therapeutic strategy that is assessed in a phase II study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]