Search

This multicentre prospective clinical trial aimed to determine whether early administration of alendronate (ALN) delays fracture healing after surgical treatment of fractures of the distal radius. The study population comprised 80 patients (four men and 76 women) with a mean age of 70 years (52 to 86) with acute fragility fractures of the distal radius requiring open reduction and internal fixation with a volar locking plate and screws. Two groups of 40 patients each were randomly allocated either to receive once weekly oral ALN administration (35 mg) within a few days after surgery and continued for six months, or oral ALN administration delayed until four months after surgery. Postero-anterior and lateral radiographs of the affected wrist were taken monthly for six months after surgery. No differences between groups was observed with regard to gender (p = 1.0), age (p = 0.916), fracture classification (p = 0.274) or bone mineral density measured at the spine (p = 0.714). The radiographs were assessed by three independent assessors. There were no significant differences in the mean time to complete cortical bridging observed between the ALN group (3.5 months (se 0.16)) and the no-ALN group (3.1 months (se 0.15)) (p = 0.068). All the fractures healed in the both groups by the last follow-up. Improvement of the Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score, grip strength, wrist range of movement, and tenderness over the fracture site did not differ between the groups over the six-month period. Based on our results, early administration of ALN after surgery for distal radius fracture did not appear to delay fracture healing times either radiologically or clinically. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1544–50.

We present a case of snapping dislocation of the flexor digitorum superficialis tendon to the small finger over the hook of the hamate that was noted after carpal tunnel release and trigger digit release.

The current concepts of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) with respect to its pathophysiology, treatment, and evaluation are discussed. With regard to the pathophysiology of idiopathic CTS, biomechanical studies to determine the kinematics of the flexor tendon, and the median nerve inside the carpal tunnel may provide valuable insights. Different degrees of excursion between the flexor tendons and the median nerve could cause strain and microdamage to the synovial tissue; this has been microscopically observed. A biomechanical approach for elucidating the events that trigger the development of CTS seems interesting; however, there are limitations to its applications. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) is a useful technique for achieving median nerve decompression. However, it is not considered superior to conventional open carpal tunnel release in terms of fast recovery of hand function. Unless the effect of inserting a cannula into the diseased carpal tunnel on the median nerve function is quantitatively elucidated, ECTR will not be regarded as a standard procedure for relieving the median nerve from chronic compression. The treatment of CTS should be evaluated on the basis of patient-oriented questionnaires as well as conventional instruments because these questionnaires have been validated and found to be highly responsive to the treatment. It should be noted that nerve conduction studies exclusively evaluate the function of the median nerve, whereas patient-oriented questionnaires take into account not only the symptoms of CTS but other accompanying pathologies as well, such as flexor tenosynovitis. In Japan, the number of CTS patients is expected to rise; this may be attributed to a general increase in the life-span of the Japanese and increase in the number of diabetic patients. Thus, more efforts should be directed toward elucidating the pathophysiology of so-called idiopathic CTS, so that new treatment strategies can be established for CTS of different pathologies.