Search

The glycoform of a therapeutic monoclonal antibody (mAb) has a significant impact on its effector function as well as its safety and pharmacokinetics. Glycoform heterogeneity is influenced by various factors, including the producing cells and cell culture processes. Therefore, accurate glycoform characterization is essential for drug design, process optimization, manufacturing, and quality control of therapeutic mAbs. In this study, we developed a fast, quantitative, and highly sensitive analytical platform for glycan profiling by supercritical fluid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (SFC-MS/MS) and applied the technique to the glycan structural analysis of mAbs. To achieve both the highest sensitivity and the most comprehensive glycan profiling, we integrated our energy-resolved oxonium ion monitoring (Erexim) method with SFC-MS to construct a new SFC-Erexim technology. An 8 min analysis of bevacizumab, nivolumab, ramucirumab, rituximab, and trastuzumab by SFC-Erexim detected a total of 102 glycoforms, with a detection limit of 5 attomoles. The dynamic range of glycan abundance was over 6 orders of magnitude for bevacizumab analysis by SFC-Erexim compared to 3 orders of magnitude for conventional fluorescence HPLC analysis. This method revealed the glycan profile characteristics and lot-to-lot heterogeneity of various therapeutic mAbs. We were also able to detect a series of structural variations in pharmacologically important glycan structures. The SFC-MS-based glycoform profiling method will provide an ideal platform for the in-depth analysis of precise glycan structure and abundance.

Hypertension is one of the main side effects of ramucirumab(RAM)plus paclitaxel(PTX)therapy. Although dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers(D-CCBs)are considered to cause drug-drug interactions with PTX based on the inhibition of cytochrome P450, D-CCBs are often administered to patients receiving RAM plus PTX therapy in clinical practice. We retrospectively studied the actual usage of antihypertensive drugs in 133 advanced or recurrent gastric cancer patients who received RAM plus PTX therapy. Antihypertensive drugs were administered to 34(25.6%)patients. Among them, 13 (38.2%)received antihypertensive drugs during the first course, and 19(55.9%)received D-CCBs. We also investigated whether D-CCBs affect the expression of Grade 3 or higher neutropenia caused by PTX. Results of multivariate analysis indicated that D-CCBs did not increase the risk of neutropenia caused by PTX.

The association between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of regorafenib, a multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor, remains unclear. This study assessed the trough plasma concentrations (Ctrough) of regorafenib and its N-oxide (M2) and N-oxide/desmethyl (M5) metabolites, and evaluated the associations among these levels, adverse events, and pharmacokinetic-related genetic polymorphisms in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The Ctrough levels of regorafenib and its metabolites were assessed in a single-center, prospective, observational study, 7 days after the initial treatment. The correlation between those values and adverse events was then examined. In addition, the genetic polymorphisms of ABCG2, SLCO1B1, and UGT1A9 were determined and evaluated for associations with the levels of regorafenib, M2, and M5. We analyzed 43 patients who received regorafenib 40–120 mg/day; among them, 35 patients started at 120 mg/day. With regard to bilirubin increase, the Ctrough values of regorafenib were significantly higher in the group with grade ≥ 2 than in groups with grades 0 and 1 (p = 0.010). The M5 Ctrough levels were significantly associated with the severity of hypertension or rash (p

BACKGROUND/AIM This study aimed was to clarify the impact of pegfilgrastim (PEG) 3.6 mg primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia (FN) on the average relative dose intensity (ARDI) of neoadjuvant/adjuvant FEC-100 for breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective, single-centre cohort study including 296 patients who received FEC-100 compared PEG and non-PEG groups. The PEG group received PEG 3.6 mg as a single subcutaneous injection in each study cycle. The primary endpoint was the ARDI of FEC-100. The secondary endpoints were patient percentage of ARDI≥85%, factors associated with ARDI≥85%, and reasons for reduced ARDI. RESULTS The PEG group showed significantly higher mean ARDI (95.6% versus 90.7%, p

Background/Aim: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are associated with the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in patients with melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer. We therefore evaluated the relationship between irAEs and nivolumab efficacy against metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Patients and Methods: The medical records of 53 consecutive patients were reviewed and analyzed. Results: Median overall survival was significantly better in patients who showed irAEs at any time compared to patients without irAEs (p=0.013). We identified irAEs in 24 of 53 patients (45.3%), including four patients (7.5%) with grade 3 events. Multivariate analysis also revealed that risk factors for the onset of irAEs were positively associated with a platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio

This study aimed to examine the safety of fixed-dose nivolumab.We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 113 Japanese patients with gastric cancer who were previously treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy and initiated nivolumab. The endpoints were the incidence of Grade 2 or higher immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in the conventional dose (3 mg/kg) and fixed-dose groups (240 mg).The incidence rates of irAEs in the conventional-dose and fixed-dose groups were 29.9% and 19.4%, respectively, and the rates of Grade 2 or higher irAEs were 23.3% and 19.4%, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups, suggesting that nivolumab at 240 mg is as safe as the 3 mg/kg dose.This is the first report on the safety of nivolumab at 240 mg in Japanese patients.

Obinutuzumab is used to treat follicular lymphoma in Japan. Its characteristic adverse event is infusion- related reactions(IRRs). Although interruption of administration improves many IRRs, serious symptoms can occur; thus, timing the interruption to correspond with the onset of these symptoms is necessary. However, the specific symptoms and timing of IRRs caused by obinutuzumab remain unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to clarify the specific symptoms and timing of the onset of IRRs with obinutuzumab treatment.Thirty patients were administered obinutuzumab for one year from October 2018 to September 2019. The frequency of IRRs, expression time, severity, symptoms, and correspondence were investigated.IRRs occurred in 13 patients(43.3%), and all occurred after the first dosing. In 9 of 13 cases(69.2%), IRRs occurred within 90 min of the first dosage. Grade 3 symptoms were expressed in 1 of 13 cases (7.7%). The symptoms of IRRs were throat discomfort, breathing difficulty, skin rash, chills, and fever.Most IRRs due to obinutuzumab occurred within 90 min of the first dosage. They were mostly Grade 2 or lower, and the frequency of serious IRRs was low. Thus, careful observation of symptoms during treatment with obinutuzumab is necessary.

S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) is an established treatment for advanced gastric cancer. S-1 adherence is the key to successful SOX treatment. This study focused on S-1 adherence by evaluating real-world adherence to S-1 and investigating factors related to decreased S-1 adherence. This study included cases treated between August 1, 2014 and October 12, 2016 at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research. The S-1 adherence rate per cycle was defined as the number of times a patient took S-1/28. In this study, adherence to S-1 was assessed through pill counts and by asking the patient about the reason for non-adherence at a pharmaceutical outpatient clinic. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate factors influencing lower adherence. This analysis included 116 patients evaluated for adherence to S-1 on SOX treatment. The median rate of adherence to S-1 was 92.8% in the first cycle and 90.5% in the seventh cycle. The median relative dose intensity of S-1 was 84.6%. In terms of reasons for nonadherence, patients most commonly cited nausea/vomiting (43.7%), diarrhea (20.8%), missed dose (11.8%), and fever (8.1%). Logistic regression analysis was performed using the most appropriate regression equation, and a significant association was detected with 1 factor, number of combined drugs ≥5 (odds ratio (OR) = 2.50; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04-6.03, p = 0.04). Eliminating unnecessary concomitant medications helps maintain proper adherence to S-1 in SOX treatment.

Purpose: Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) can deteriorate quality of life in patients receiving regorafenib. Cutaneous toxicity is a main adverse effect of multikinase inhibitors and has also been associated with clinical outcome. This study assessed the association between the antitumor efficacy of regorafenib and HFSR in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: Patients who received regorafenib at 160 mg/day during the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle were divided into subgroups based on whether they developed HFSR between May 2013 and October 2015. Estimates of overall survival and progression-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Ninety-seven patients received at least one dose of regorafenib in this retrospective study. Of these patients, 81.4% (n = 79) experienced HFSR of any grade, and 34.0% (n = 33) had grade 3 HFSR. Among those patients with HFSR at any time during the study, 68.0% (n = 66) underwent the first HFSR event (any grade) during cycle 1. Both overall survival and progression-free survival were improved in patients who had HFSR grade ≥2 at any time compared with those who had HFSR grade ≤1. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a history of HFSR grade ≥2 induced by capecitabine as a significant risk factor for severe HFSR (grade ≥2). Conclusions: Patients with mCRC treated using regorafenib who experienced severe HFSR showed better overall survival than patients without severe HFSR. Severe HFSR may offer an early surrogate marker for the efficacy of regorafenib in patients with mCRC.

Background: The association between regorafenib dosage in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer and efficacy is currently not well established. It was previously reported that the regorafenib dose as prescribed is associated with efficacy, but doses in actual clinical settings have not been analyzed. This study was to examine the association between the clinical significance of the cumulative dose of regorafenib in the early cycles and treatment efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had received regorafenib as third-line or later chemotherapy between May 2013 and June 2018. Patients who were not treated in the Pharmaceutical Outpatient Clinic for compliance assessment were excluded. Overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors, including baseline demographics and adverse events, were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models. Results: A total of 176 patients were enrolled. By multivariate analysis, total dose until the second cycle P = 0.003), age P P = 0.001), hepatic metastasis (HR 2.86, 95% CI, 1.90-4.30, P P = 0.01) were independent negative predictors of overall survival. Median survival times of the lower dose group (P = 0.045).Conclusion: The cumulative dose of regorafenib until the second cycle in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer was associated with survival. It is important to individualize regorafenib dose in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the effect of the antiemetic drug olanzapine(OLZ)on blood sugar levels in patients treated with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy(AC: doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide or CEF: cyclophosphamide plus epirubicin plus fluorouracil) for breast cancer. Here, we evaluated the frequency of diabetes(postprandial blood sugar: PBS≥200 mg/dL)and the change in PBS in 149 patients who were prescribed OLZ between September 2016 and August 2017 at our hospital. No diabetic patients were identified during the observation period(median: 3 cycles of chemotherapy). Among the 95 patients with more than 2 PBS readings, no difference was observed in the incidence of increased PBS, regardless of the diabetic risk, before and after OLZ administration. This study therefore found that the short term use of OLZ as an antiemetic had little effect on PBS, suggesting that it can be used safely during treatment with AC or CEF.

The association between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of regorafenib, a multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor, remains unclear. This study assessed the trough plasma concentrations (CThe CWe analyzed 43 patients who received regorafenib 40-120 mg/day; among them, 35 patients started at 120 mg/day. With regard to bilirubin increase, the CThis study showed that the C

Although a short hydration protocol for cisplatin has been recently developed for use in lung cancer, this has yet to be established for gastric cancer. This study reviewed medical records of patients with gastric cancer who received XPT(capecitabine/cisplatin/trastuzumab) therapy containing cisplatin. Patients received either the conventional or short hydration regimen. Nephrotoxicity was compared between these two regimens by monitoring the serum creatinine. Out of the 26 total patients, 19 received the conventional regimen while 7 received the short hydration regimen. There was a higher nephrotoxicity was observed in the group receiving the conventional regimen (42.1%, 8/19) as compared to the short hydration regimen (0%, 0/7). There was a statistically significant difference in nephrotoxicity between the regimens (

Background We conducted an economic assessment using test data from the phase III TRIPLE study, which examined the efficacy of a 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 receptor antagonist as part of a standard triplet antiemetic regimen including aprepitant and dexamethasone in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving cisplatin-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). Methods We retrospectively investigated all medicines prescribed for antiemetic purposes within 120 h after the initiation of cisplatin administration during hospitalization. In the TRIPLE study, patients were assigned to treatment with granisetron (GRA) 1 mg (n = 413) or palonosetron (PALO) 0.75 mg (n = 414). The evaluation measure was the cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) assessed as the cost per complete response (CR; no vomiting/retching and no rescue medication). The analysis was conducted from the public healthcare payer’s perspective. Results The CR rates were 59.1% in the GRA group and 65.7% in the PALO group (P = 0.0539), and the total frequencies of rescue medication use for these groups were 717 (153/413 patients) and 573 (123/414 patients), respectively. In both groups, drugs with antidopaminergic effects were chosen as rescue medication in 86% of patients. The costs of including GRA and PALO in the standard triplet antiemetic regimen were 15,342.8 and 27,863.8 Japanese yen (JPY), respectively. In addition, the total costs of rescue medication use were 73,883.8 (range, 71,106.4–79,017.1) JPY for the GRA group and 59,292.7 (range, 57,707.5–60,972.8) JPY for the PALO group. The CERs (JPY/CR) were 26,263.4 and 42,628.6 for the GRA and PALO groups, respectively, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) between the groups was 189,171.6 (189,044.8–189,215.5) JPY/CR. Conclusions We found that PALO was more expensive than GRA in patients who received a cisplatin-based HEC regimen. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s40780-018-0128-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

BackgroundElevation of the international normalized ratio and bleeding complications has been reported in patients taking warfarin concomitantly with tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as gefitinib and erlotinib.ObjectiveTo assess the frequency, degree, and onset of international normalized ratio elevation in patients receiving warfarin with gefitinib or erlotinib, and changes in vitro cytochrome P450 2C9 activity.MethodsThis retrospective, single-center, observational study compared international normalized ratio values during the treatment with warfarin in the absence and presence of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors, gefitinib, and erlotinib. In addition, the inhibitory effect of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on cytochrome P450 2C9 activity was screened in an in vitro study.ResultsCompared with international normalized ratio at the baseline significant ( P ConclusionIn most patients, international normalized ratio elevation was observed within two weeks of the start of concomitant therapy with warfarin and gefitinib or erlotinib. To avoid excessive anticoagulant response by warfarin, international normalized ratio should be carefully monitored weekly and dosage adjustment of warfarin might be recommended during the first month after the start of concurrent tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

The triplet antiemetic regimen is recommended for cisplatin-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy, in the current guidelines for antiemetic prophylaxis. Although risk factors related to chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) have been identified by several prior studies, there are only few studies evaluating risk factors associated with the prophylactic triplet antiemetic therapy, particularly in palonosetron use. The present study aimed to reveal the risk factors related to CINV development in patients receiving cisplatin and to compare CINV risk factors between palonosetron and granisetron use. In total, 825 patients in a phase III trial receiving palonosetron with graniestron were evaluated. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to predict risk factors associated with CINV development. Additionally, risk factors associated with CINV development were separately evaluated in each treatment group. Multivariate analysis of the entire study group revealed that sex, age, cisplatin dose, and granisetron use were significant and independent factors affecting CINV development in the overall phase. Similarly, sex and age were risk factors for CINV in both treatment groups. Kaplan–Meier curves classified by each treatment group showed no significant difference between the groups among patients without any risk factors for CINV (P = 0.353). Conversely, complete response rates for patients with at least one risk factor were higher in patients receiving palonosetron (P = 0.049). This analysis revealed the importance of previously reported CINV risk factors when using triplet antiemetics. Palonosetron might be preferred for patients with at least one risk factor.

The association between regorafenib dosage in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and efficacy is currently not well established. It was previously reported that the regorafenib dose as prescribed is associated with efficacy, but doses in actual clinical settings have not been analyzed. We retrospectively analyzed patients with mCRC who had received regorafenib as third-line or later chemotherapy between May 2013 and June 2018. Patients who were not treated in the Pharmaceutical Outpatient Clinic for compliance assessment were excluded. Overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Prognostic factors, including baseline demographics and adverse events, were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models. A total of 176 patients were enrolled. By multivariate analysis, total dose until the second cycle < 3180 mg (HR = 1.71, 95% CI, 1.20–2.44, P = .003) was one of independent negative predictors of overall survival. Median survival times of the lower-dose group (< 3180 mg) and higher-dose group (≥ 3180 mg) were 5.8 and 7.6 months, respectively ( P = .045). The cumulative dose of regorafenib until the second cycle in patients with mCRC was associated with survival. It is important to individualize regorafenib dose in mCRC patients.

Aim Combination therapy with gemcitabine and nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel), known as GnP therapy, significantly prolongs the survival of pancreatic cancer patients compared with gemcitabine monotherapy. However, it may cause severe neutropenia, requiring discontinuation of treatment. This study aimed to clarify the risk factors for Grade 3/4 neutropenia during GnP therapy. Methods Clinical data of pancreatic cancer patients who underwent GnP therapy at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research from December 2014 to December 2016 were retrospectively collected. The relationship of Grade 3/4 neutropenia onset to laboratory values and patient background factors was investigated by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results Clinical data of 222 patients were analyzed. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 118 patients (53.2%) in the first cycle of GnP therapy. Multivariate analysis identified low absolute neutrophil count (ANC), high total bilirubin (T-Bil), and low C-reactive protein (CRP) as risk factors for Grade 3/4 neutropenia. Age was not a risk factor. The incidence of neutropenia was 85.7% in patients with all three risk factors, but only 27.7% in patients with none of them. Conclusion Low ANC, high T-Bil, and low CRP may be risk factors for Grade 3/4 neutropenia in patients receiving GnP therapy, even if these laboratory values are within normal reference ranges. Patients with these risk factors should be carefully monitored for adverse events.

Adherence has become an important issue in modern oncology treatment. Most studies have included heterogeneous target tumor types, regimens, and therapy settings. Our study focused on capecitabine during capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) treatment as an adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer. The main aims of this study were to evaluate real-life adherence to capecitabine and to investigate candidate factors that might decrease adherence. We studied 338 consecutive patients who received XELOX treatment between December 1, 2011, and April 30, 2015, at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research. Our study assessed adherence to capecitabine through patient-reported treatment diaries and interviewed nonadherents to determine the reasons for not taking capecitabine at a pharmaceutical outpatient clinic. We calculated the adherence rate in a cycle as: number of times the patient took capecitabine/28. Relative dose intensities and factors associated with deteriorating adherence to capecitabine were retrospectively surveyed from electronic patient records. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to investigate factors associated with optimal adherence. The study covered 282 patients who received 2,055 cycles of XELOX. Median adherence rate was 94.0% in the first cycle, and median relative dose intensity of capecitabine was 77.8%. The most common reasons for nonadherence were nausea/vomiting and diarrhea. The presence of the following factors was not significantly associated with adherence: ECOG performance status ≥1 (p = 0.715), clinical stage (p = 0.408), primary tumor site (p = 0.576), age ≥70 years at study entry (p = 0.757), female gender (p = 0.504), and not living alone (p = 0.579). The adherence rate from this study was significantly higher than the adherence from metastatic settings. Adherence-enhancing interventions for capecitabine in XELOX treatment as adjuvant therapy comprised management of nausea/vomiting and diarrhea.

Purpose: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have been associated with the efficacy of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors in patients with urothelial cancer. We therefore evaluated the relationship between irAEs and pembrolizumab efficacy in urothelial cancer patients. Methods: Patients with urothelial cancer who were treated with pembrolizumab in a second-line setting or later between January 2018 and December 2018 were identified by reviewing their medical records from the Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research. Data were updated as of December 31, 2018. Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) according to irAE grade were evaluated using the log-rank test. Risk factors for exacerbation of irAEs were also evaluated with multivariate analysis. Results: In this retrospective study, 43 patients received pembrolizumab. We identified irAEs in 22 of the 43 patients (51.2%), including 11 patients (25.6%) with grade 2 or 3 events. In patients with irAE grade 0 or 1, median TTF was 127 days, and median OS was 160 days according to the Kaplan-Meier method. On the other hand, in patients with irAE grade ≥2, median TTF and OS were not reached. Multivariate analysis also revealed that risk factors for exacerbation of irAEs (to grade ≥2) were positively associated with lymphocyte count at baseline (>2,000/µL) before pembrolizumab treatment (p = 0.021). Conclusions: Development of irAEs was associated with survival outcome of pembrolizumab treatment in patients with advanced urothelial cancer.

Several studies have reported increased anticoagulation effect of warfarin(WF)when combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors(TKIs), such as gefitinib and erlotinib. However, effects of TKIs other than gefitinib and erlotinib on the anticoagulation effect of WF have not been clarified. To assess the degree and onset of prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR)elevation and changes in WF daily doses in patients additionally receiving TKIs, this retrospective, single-center observational study compared PT-INR values and WF daily doses during WF treatment in the absence and presence of TKIs. Seven different TKIs(afatinib, alectinib, axitinib, crizotinib, pazopanib, regorafenib, and vandetanib)were prescribed during treatment with WF of venous thromboembolism in 10 cancer patients. Compared to baseline PT-INR, significant PT-INR elevations were observed in all patients during the combination therapy. The median PT-INR increased 1.6-fold from the baseline in the presence of TKIs(p0.01), and the onset of PT-INR elevation was observed at a median of 18 days. As all patients receiving WF with the 7 TKIs showed PT-INR elevation, enhancement of the anticoagulation effect of WF in the presence of TKIs appears to be highly frequent. PT-INR should be carefully monitored, and adjusting the WF dosage may become necessary during the WF and TKI combination therapy.

Few studies have evaluated the influence of anticancer drugs on the anticoagulation response to warfarin(WF). This retrospective, single-center, observationalstudy evaluated the changes in prothrombin time-internationalnormal ized ratio (PT-INR)in patients receiving a combination of WF and anticancer drugs. We compared(a)PT-INR changes between groups receiving WF and concomitantly started on either tyrosine kinase inhibitors(TKI)(WF+TKI group: n=14)or anticancer drugs other than TKI(WF+non-TKI group: n=20)and(b)PT-INR changes between groups that were started on WF concomitantly while receiving either TKI(TKI+WF group: n=16)or anticancer drugs other than TKI(non-TKI+WF group: n=13). (a)PT-INR changes were significantly larger in the WF+TKI group than in the WF+non-TKI group(2.23 vs 0.42, p0.001). In the WF+TKI group, the WF dose was reduced after all 14 patients(100.0%)showed increased PT-INR.(b)PT-INR changes during the WF induction period were significantly larger in the TKI+WF group than in the non-TKI+WF group(2.18 vs 0.68, p0.001). In the TKI+WF group, the WF dose was reduced after 12 patients(75.0%)showed increased PT-INR. It might be necessary to consider a reduction in WF dose when WF is administered in combination with TKIs.

Background: A novel oral agent that consists of trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride (TFTD) has been established as salvage-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Adherence to TFTD is crucial to maintaining appropriate curative effects. This study sought to clarify adherence to TFTD and identify candidate factors deteriorating adherence at our institution. Methods: A total of 50 consecutive mCRC patients who received TFTD monotherapy between June 1, 2014 and July 31, 2015 were analyzed in this study. Adherence to TFTD was checked by pharmacists using a self-reported treatment diary and interviewing nonadherents at a pharmaceutical outpatient clinic. The adherence rate was defined as the number of patient intakes per 20 scheduled intakes in one cycle. We retrospectively surveyed the factors from the electronic patient record associated with reduced adherence. We measured relative dose intensity, defined as the dose intensity divided by the initial dose (each in milligrams per square meter per week). Results: Patient characteristics were as follows: males/females, 20/30; median age, 61 years (range, 34-83 years); performance status 0/1, 37/13. Median relative dose intensity of TFTD was 91.0%. Adherence rates were 95.0% for the first cycle of TFTD, 97.3% for the second cycle, 98.0% for the third cycle, and 98.2% for the fourth cycle. Factors associated with deteriorated adherence to TFTD were nausea/vomiting/decreased appetite (27.1%, 23 instances), pain (25.9%, 22 instances), neutropenia (11.8%, 10 instances), and missed dose (4.7%, 4 instances). Increased nonadherence to TFTD was associated with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 1, while increased TFTD adherence in the first cycle was associated with prior regimens ≥4. Conclusions: The high frequency of treatment-related gastrointestinal disorder is the main factor affecting adherence to TFTD. Intensive supportive care in the management of these symptoms could assist adequate adherence to TFTD in mCRC patients.

684 Background: Albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) and gemcitabine combination therapy (GnP therapy) significantly extends overall survival in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, compared to conventional gemcitabine monotherapy. However, severe neutropenia (Grade ≥ 3) occurred in 67.6% of patients in the Japanese phase I/II trials of GnP therapy, and is often a limiting factor. The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors for severe neutropenia in pancreatic patients receiving GnP therapy in clinical settings. Methods: A retrospective study of 222 consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer who received GnP therapy at the Cancer Institute Hospital from December 2014 to December 2016 was conducted. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare blood test values and patients’ characteristics between patients with no neutropenia or Grade 1/2 (non-serious) neutropenia and those with Grade ≥ 3 (severe) neutropenia. Results: There were 19 patients (8.6%) with modified FOLFIRINOX in the previous treatment history. The median doses of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine were 192.5 mg (range 134-277.5) and 1,545 mg (range 1,000-2,220), respectively. Severe neutropenia and febrile neutropenia occurred in 118 patients (53.2%) and 15 patients (6.8%), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that ANC (absolute neutrophil count) < 3.03 x 103 /μL (OR: 4.806, 95% CI: 2.416-9.558, p = 0.000), T-Bil ≥ 0.6 mg/dl (OR: 1.964, 95% CI: 1.040-3.708, p = 0.037) and CRP < 0.13 mg/dl (OR: 2.607, 95% CI: 1.331-5.106, p = 0.005) were significant risk factors for severe neutropenia. The incidence rate of severe neutropenia was 85.7% (18/21) in patients with all three identified factors, while it was 27.7% (13/47) in patients with none of them. Age was not a risk factor in either univariate or multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Low ANC, high T-Bil, and low CRP were found to be risk factors for severe neutropenia in patients receiving GnP therapy. It would be desirable to monitor patients with these risk factors carefully, even if their values are within the standard ranges.

Elevation of the international normalized ratio and bleeding complications has been reported in patients taking warfarin concomitantly with tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as gefitinib and erlotinib.To assess the frequency, degree, and onset of international normalized ratio elevation in patients receiving warfarin with gefitinib or erlotinib, and changesThis retrospective, single-center, observational study compared international normalized ratio values during the treatment with warfarin in the absence and presence of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors, gefitinib, and erlotinib. In addition, the inhibitory effect of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on cytochrome P450 2C9 activity was screened in anCompared with international normalized ratio at the baseline significant (In most patients, international normalized ratio elevation was observed within two weeks of the start of concomitant therapy with warfarin and gefitinib or erlotinib. To avoid excessive anticoagulant response by warfarin, international normalized ratio should be carefully monitored weekly and dosage adjustment of warfarin might be recommended during the first month after the start of concurrent tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

Regorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Regorafenib-induced hand‐foot skin reaction (HFSR) is a common side effect during treatment. The reported frequency of HFSR was 80% (grade 3: 28%) in the Japanese subpopulation in the CORRECT trial; however, more detailed data regarding HFSR in terms of onset and sites of susceptibility are unclear. Additionally, the risk factors for regorafenib-induced severe HFSR are unknown. The aim of this study was to compare HFSR between the hands and feet and identify preexisting risk factors for severe HFSR in Japanese patients receiving regorafenib. We retrospectively examined the onset and severity of HFSR on the hands and feet of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with regorafenib from May 2013 to October 2015 in the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research. In addition, we examined the possible association between preexisting clinical factors and severe HFSR. Our results showed that no significant difference in the incidence of HFSR of any grade was observed between the hands (71%) and feet (74%) (p = 0.63). The incidence of grade 3 HFSR was more frequent on the feet (33%) than on the hands (8%) (p p

Younger age and female sex have already been well-known risk factors for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), and 30–50% of cancer patients still suffer from CINV. Genetic polymorphisms are suggested to influence antiemetic treatment response. This study included a subset of patients previously enrolled in a randomised controlled trial; 156 patients were evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate the role of pharmacogenomic polymorphisms relevant to antiemetic response in patients with cancer receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The study’s efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with complete response (CR). The study endpoint was evaluated separately in the acute (CR0–24) and delayed (CR24–120) phases. Thirteen polymorphisms were genotyped, and the association of these genotypes with the efficacy of prophylactic antiemetics was then investigated. Confounding variables for the CR were identified using stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis. Age and sex were included as independent variables by the forced-entry method, and the stepwise method was used to select the pharmacogenomic factors for inclusion as independent variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the ERCC1 8092AA (odds ratio [OR] = 11.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.74–72.71; p = 0.011) and female sex (OR = 3.63; 95% CI 1.14–11.58; p = 0.029) were significant predictors of CR0–24. No significant association of CR24–120 with pharmacogenomic polymorphisms was found via multivariate logistic regression analysis. ERCC1 polymorphism influenced the extent of CINV control in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: UMIN 000009335

The control of delayed emesis is very important in order to continue ambulatory chemotherapy. We performed retrospective study that examined the efficacy of preventive treatment (granisetron+dexamethasone+domperidone) for delayed emesis induced by FOLFOX4 chemotherapy for advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer. The subjects were 92 patients who underwent FOLFOX4 chemotherapy at the Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR (group with preventive treatment: 50, group without preventive treatment: 42), and the observation period was set as the 1st-9th cycle. The complete nausea inhibition rate was 50.0% in the group with and 21.5% in the group without preventive treatment, showing a significantly higher inhibition rate in the former (p=0.0047). The complete vomiting inhibition rates were 86.0% and 66.7%, respectively, again showing a significantly higher inhibition rate in the former (p=0.015). On multivariate analysis (multiple logistic analysis), the development of nausea/vomiting and preventive treatment for delayed emesis were significantly associated, showing that the treatment was an independent preventive factor. All adverse reactions induced by preventive treatment were mild, suggesting no safety-related problem. These findings suggested the usefulness of preventive treatment with granisetron, dexamethasone, and domperidone for FOLFOX4 chemotherapy-induced delayed emesis.

We investigated the extent of environmental contamination due to the preparation of antineoplastic drugs and the exposure of pharmacists to them in the course of their work.In 2006,we determined the levels of cyclophosphamide (CP) in 5 samples taken from different areas of our pharmacy.The CP levels in the work area of the Biological Safety Cabinet (BSC),on the airfoil in the BSC,outside the BSC in the antineoplastics preparation room and outside the preparation room were 6.82 ng/cm2,26.19 ng/cm2,0.59 ng/cm2 and 0.15 ng/cm2,respectively.No CP was detected in the delivery box.The mean level of CP in 24-hour urine samples taken from the 6 pharmacists engaged in the preparation of antineoplastic drugs was 17.7±18.7 ng/24 hr.Based on these results,as a means of preventing exposure to antineoplastic drugs,we conducted improvement programs with regard to the following : (1)operation manuals for cleaning,(2)disposal methods for medical devices,(3)location for dissolution of CP,(4)gowns for pharmacists,(5)having utensils for exclusive use in the preparation of antineoplastic drugs and (6)training of pharmacists.In 2008,we investigated the situation again.CP levels in the work area of the BSC,on the airfoil in the BSC,outside the BSC in the preparation room and outside the preparation room were 0.02 ng/cm2,0.04 ng/cm2,0.25 ng/cm2 and 0.01 ng/ cm2,respectively.No CP was detected in the delivery box.The mean 24-hour urine sample CP level in the 4 pharmacists engaged in the preparation of antineoplastic drugs was 39.0±14.3 ng/24 hr,which was similar to that for 2 pharmacists not engaged in preparation of antineoplastic drugs.These results suggest that the intervention programs we conducted after the 1st CP investigation had been effective in reducing environmental contamination,especially in the BSC,but had not reduced the exposure of pharmacists to CP.

At the time of introduction of the electronic medical records system,we introduced additional systems such as those for chemotherapy regimen registration and prescription inspection in order to carry out cancer chemotherapy treatments safely.Later,on conducting an investigation of 139,615 prescriptions for injectable agents from September 2006 to August 2007,we found that our systems had reduced the numbers of inquiries such as those concerning omissions and overdosage.There were 407 inquiries concerning the 16,287 anticancer agent prescriptions among them and they uncovered prescribing errors such as selection of wrong regimens and making mistakes in cycle counts,that could have led to medical malpractice.We also found that inquiry rates were higher for breast cancer and colorectal cancer regimens.Our findings indicated that mechanical prescription checking systems alone are not sufficient for ensuring safe treatment with anticancer agents and therefore the checking of prescriptions by pharmacists is considered to be very important.

Resistance to antiemetic treatment with 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist is an issue. This study evaluated the potential roles of ABCB1 and ABCG2 polymorphisms in antiemetic treatment resistance in patients with cancer previously enrolled in a randomized controlled trial. A total of 156 patients were evaluated for their responses to antiemetic therapy and then subdivided into granisetron or palonosetron groups. The genotypes were evaluated for their association with antiemetic efficacy in each treatment groups. Additional risk factors associated with complete response (CR) were examined using a multivariate regression analysis. No significant associations were identified for genetic polymorphisms in the palonosetron group. In the granisetron group, patients with ABCB1 2677TT and 3435TT genotypes had higher proportion of CR. In addition to ABCB1 polymorphisms, gender and cisplatin dose were associated with granisetron response by univariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the ABCB1 3435C>T polymorphism and cisplatin dose were significant predictors of CR.

Background: Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOx) ± bevacizumab therapy is associated with a high incidence of hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), hindering treatment. However, timing of onset and risk factors remain unclear. Objective: This study examined the development of HFSR and risk factors for its exacerbation to a serious condition in CapeOx ± bevacizumab therapy. Methods: We retrospectively examined patients with colorectal cancer receiving CapeOx ± bevacizumab therapy between October 1, 2009, and March 31, 2012. The observation period was defined as lasting until completion of 8 cycles. The relationship between cumulative dose of capecitabine and cumulative proportion of patients developing HFSR was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier methods. Risk factors for exacerbation of HFSR to a serious condition were assessed by multiple logistic regression. Results: Data for 203 patients were analyzed. For patients treated at cumulative capecitabine doses of 100 000 mg/m2 and 200 000 mg/m2, Grade 1 HFSR occurred in ≥80% and ≥90%, respectively, and moderate-to-severe HFSR (Grade 2+) occurred in ≥10% and ≥20%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed significant associations with diabetes (odds ratio [OR] = 4.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.86-12.34; P = 0.001), concomitant use of bevacizumab (OR = 6.01; 95% CI = 2.20-16.41; P = 0.001), history of fluorinated pyrimidine administration (OR = 2.42; 95% CI = 1.10-5.33; P = 0.027), and early onset (within 21 days) of Grade 1 HFSR (OR = 3.78; 95% CI = 1.64-8.70; P = 0.001). Conclusions: HFSR in CapeOx therapy is a cumulative toxicity and risk of exacerbation to a serious condition increases with diabetes, concomitant use of bevacizumab, history of fluorinated pyrimidine administration, and onset of Grade 1 HFSR within 21 days.

Hypothyroidism is one of the side-effects caused by regorafenib. In the Japanese subset of the CORRECT study, hypothyroidism developed in 1.5% of the patients, but was not grade 3 or higher in any patient. Regorafenib is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor that has the same mechanism of action as sunitinb. However, the reported incidence of sunitinb-related hypothyroidism varies widely, ranging from 16.0% in clinical trials to 35.4% in post-marketing surveillance studies. In general, symptoms of hypothyroidism include fatigue and dysphonia. Hyperthyroidism must, therefore, be appropriately managed in order to maintain patient quality of life and avoid a critical level of hypothyroidism. During the first cycle of treatment with regorafenib, the incidence of abnormal thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) elevation was 31.4%. Our results suggest that thyroid function tests should be performed from day 1 of treatment with regorafenib. It would be prudent to consider routine monitoring of thyroid function in all patients who receive regorafenib and to recommend endocrinological consultation as necessary.