Search

Background: Eyelid ptosis is an underestimated pathology deeply affecting patients' quality of life. Internet has increasingly become the major source of information regarding health care, and patients often browse on websites to acquire an initial knowledge on the subject. However, there is lack of data concerning the quality of available information focusing on the eyelid ptosis and its treatment. We systematically evaluated online information quality on eyelid ptosis by using the "Ensuring Quality Information for Patients" (EQIP) scale., Materials and Methods: Google, Yahoo and Bing have been searched for the keywords "Eyelid ptosis," "Eyelid ptosis surgery" and "Blepharoptosis." The first 50 hits were included, evaluating the quality of information with the expanded EQIP tool. Websites in English and intended for general non-medical public use were included. Irrelevant documents, videos, pictures, blogs and articles with no access were excluded., Results: Out of 138 eligible websites, 79 (57,7%) addressed more than 20 EQIP items, with an overall median score of 20,2. Only 2% discussed procedure complication rates. The majority fail to disclose severe complications and quantifying risks, fewer than 18% clarified the potential need for additional treatments. Surgical procedure details were lacking, and there was insufficient information about pre-/postoperative precautions for patients. Currently, online quality information has not improved since COVID-19 pandemic., Conclusions: This study highlights the urgent requirement for improved patient-oriented websites adhering to international standards for plastic and oculoplastic surgery. Healthcare providers should effectively guide their patients in finding trustworthy and reliable eyelid ptosis correction information., Level of Evidence V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 ., (© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.)

Introduction: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is a surgical procedure increasingly performed for breast cancer or risk reduction surgeries. The site of skin incision seems to affect not only cosmesis but also technical ease in operating and vascular viability of the nipple. We present a series of patients who underwent a modified vertical surgical approach for NSM, which resulted to be safe, reliable, and with good esthetic results., Materials and Methods: From December 2016 to February 2019, 27 "Hook Shape" incision NSMs were performed. All patients underwent an immediate subcutaneous muscle-sparing reconstruction with tissue expander covered by a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh, followed by a second surgical step with expander substitution and lipofilling on the definitive implant when indicated. Preoperative and postoperative BREAST-Q patient-reported outcomes measure was performed in all cases., Results: Postoperative morbidity was evaluated: One patient developed seroma and another presented a systemic infection that resolved with intravenous infusion of antibiotics. One patient experienced vertical wound dehiscence, recovered after conservative treatment and without implant exposure. No implant loss was observed. Nipple-areola complex necrosis or ischemia rate was 0%. The BREAST-Q outcomes reported significant increases in the overall satisfaction with breast (p < 0.05), psychosocial well-being (p < 0.05), and sexual well-being (p < 0.05) sections. Scores in the physical impact of surgery section appeared to decline from preoperative to postoperative evaluations, with no statistically significant results., Conclusion: The mastectomy incision pattern can burden the surgical challenge, impact vascular viability of the nipple and significantly affect the aesthetic outcomes in breast reconstruction. We report our experience with an alternative approach for NSM, which appears a safe, practical, and reproducible method for patients with small- to medium-sized breasts and little/medium ptosis (grade I or II)., Level of Evidence Iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266., (© 2022. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.)

The thoracodorsal (TD) vessels represent a complex vascular system that offers a variety of pedicled and free flaps. Variations of the classical latissimus dorsi (LD) flap have been developed to overcome its major drawbacks. The thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap described by Angrigiani represents one of these options. Other techniques have been defined as "muscle-sparing" latissimus dorsi (MSLD) due to the preservation of the LD muscle and the TD nerve, in whole or in part. Nevertheless, the term "muscle sparing" has also been applied to the descending branch LD (DB-LD) flap which requires the denervation of the LD muscle. According to our knowledge, there are no articles in the literature reviewing and comparing the reconstructive options based on the TD vessels. We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to perform a literature review and meta-analysis about the reconstructive options based on the TD vessels. The primary outcome of interest was the percentage of flaps developing a specific early complication, i.e., hematoma of the donor site, seroma of the donor site, partial flap loss, total flap loss, wound dehiscence, and wound infection. Moreover, we analyzed the outcomes and complications of our cases, comparing the MSLD flaps, the DB-LD flaps, and the TDAP flaps. According to both our casuistry and the literature, the three techniques can be considered safe in terms of early donor site complications. According to the literature, MSLD has been shown to develop partial flap necrosis more frequently than the TDAP flap., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None of the authors received any funds or has any financial interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Single (SG-VLN) and double gastroepiploic vascularized lymph node transfer (DG-VLN) have shown promising results for the treatment of extremities' lymphedema. The literature search yields only few other cases describing outcomes following double VLN transfers, but no comparative studies have been produced so far. The aim of this study was to retrospectively examine and compare the effects of SG-VLN versus DG-VLN transfer. All patients diagnosed with extremities' stage II and III lymphedema who had undergone SG-VLN or DG-VLN between January 2012 and December 2018 were identified from two institutions' databases. Demographic and surgical data were collected. The primary endpoint was the comparison of the reduction in limb circumference (CRR) within 12 months post-surgery. Secondary endpoints included the reduction of cellulitis episodes and patients' quality of life improvement. Eighty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. At 12 months of follow-up, higher CRR values were observed in the double inset group (p<0.05*) both at above elbow/above knee (AE/AK) level (SG-VLN: 70.6% ± 0.6%; DG-VLN: 72.2% ± 0.7%) and at below elbow/below knee level (SG-VLN: 59.1% ± 1.3%; DG-VLN: 61.6% ± 3.7%). Subgroup analyses of the involved limb (upper vs lower) were consistent with the primary treatment effects. The reduction of cellulitis episodes did not differ between the two groups, while the DG-VLN group showed better results in the overall satisfaction function, symptoms, and mood domains of the LYMQoL questionnaire (p=0.04). The study suggests that either single or double transfer can produce excellent results, but double inset of the gastroepiploic VLNT flap may produce greater volume reductions both at 12 and 24 months. Further studies with a larger sample size are warranted to corroborate our results., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest None, (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Post-operative implant infection is generally rare after breast augmentation, but it can occur in up to 35% of cases in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. Standard treatment consists in the administration of antibiotics, implant removal, and delayed prosthesis replacement leading to multiple operations, with a negative impact on patient's clinical, economical, and psychological outcomes. There is little information published in the literature on the management of periprosthetic infection following pre-pectoral reconstructions. Capsule's removal from a pre-pectoral plane brings the risk of excessive tissue thinning and the compromise of skin flaps viability. In this preliminary multi-center case series, eight patients diagnosed with implant infection following oncological mastectomy and two-stage heterologous pre-pectoral breast reconstruction underwent the same protocol, consisting in tissue expander removal and conservative surgical revision supplemented by an antibiotate pulse lavage of the pocket surface. All patients achieved a successful infection resolution with immediate prosthesis replacement switching the temporary expander to definitive implant. No additional surgical revision was registered during follow-up. The intermittent irrigation is meant to disrupt the biofilm structure and restore antibiotic susceptibility. Moreover, pulse lavage allows the cleansing of the prosthetic capsule, thus avoiding the vascular stress associated with subcutaneous capsulectomy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first series reporting on the use of Pulsavac in periprosthetic infection following pre-pectoral breast reconstruction, in an attempt to set the basis for an alternative conservative protocol to manage breast implant infection. A thorough literature review on pulse lavage in breast surgery was carried out., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap has been reported in several types of reconstructions. This report aims to evaluate the usefulness and the clinical outcome of patients who underwent the PAP free flap for lower limb reconstruction., Methods: Between February 2018 and February 2020, nine patients with injury at lower third of the leg, foot dorsum or foot plant (eight acute injuries and one chronic ulcer) were selected. Mean wound size was 12.5 × 6.3 cm (9 × 5-14.5 × 6.5). Inclusion criteria consisted in patient's request to hide the donor site scar and the absence of previous traumas or surgery in the donor site. Patients considered unable to bear prolonged surgery were excluded. Patients underwent preoperative CT angiography and peri-operative Doopler, for perforator selection. All flaps were designed with pinch test, in elliptical shape. Microvascular anastomosis was performed to the tibialis anterior/posterior or medial plantar vessels. Outcomes were evaluated in terms of wound coverage success and patient's quality of life through Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) questionnaire., Results: The mean size of the harvested skin paddle was 13.5 × 7.4 cm (9 × 6-15 × 8) and mean pedicle length was 8.5 cm. Mean flap harvest time was 43.5 min (35-55). Flap survival rate was 100%, with one re-exploration with minimal partial flap loss. Mean follow-up was 13.5 months . Reconstructive results were successful in wound coverage and function. All patients reported satisfaction with their result by LEFS questionnaire (score:64.7)., Conclusion: With proper patient selection, there was 100% flap survival rate with no major complication. According to our data, the PAP free flap could be a valuable option for lower extremity reconstruction., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)