Search

Objective: To assess the prevalence and the characteristics of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) in women with endometriosis. Methods: This is a methodological paper that describes the 'Endometriosis and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction' (EndoPFD) multicenter study protocol. It involves three sites: the University Hospital of Pisa, the San Raffaele Hospital of Milan and the Vanvitelli University Hospital of Naples. Women are recruited through web links and are asked whether they want to participate to the clinical evaluation or only to the web survey. The web survey gathers personal history, endometriosis history and symptoms, and performs a subjective evaluation of PFD through questionnaires: Urinary Distress Inventory 6, Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory 8, Wexner Scale for Fecal Incontinence, Wexner Constipation Scoring System, and Female Sexual Function Index. Those interested in the clinical evaluation will add to the questionnaires the following exams: gynecological and proctological exam, pelvic ultrasound, urodynamic test, and anorectal manometry. Preliminary results: Recruitment for the web survey was completed. A total of 1,149 women signed the electronic consent, 329 were excluded due to inclusion/exclusion criteria; hence, 525 completed all the questionnaires (response rate of 64.02%). Recruitment for the clinical evaluation is ongoing. Discussion: This study protocol offers the possibility to define the prevalence of PFD in endometriosis patients with a subjective and an objective assessment of signs and symptoms. This may pave the way for changing the approach to patients with endometriosis. Moreover, it demonstrates the validity of the method used (online survey and recruitment) to reach a high number of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a recurrent, autoimmune, and inflammatory demyelinating chronic disease that typically manifests in young adulthood and exerts adverse effects on sexual functions. Aim The study evaluated the prevalence of sexual dysfunctions (SDs) and the relationship with neurological disability, depression, and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in a cohort of MS female patients, comparing these results with those of healthy women. Methods From January 2023 to January 2024, consecutive premenopausal female patients with MS, were recruited and the examination included urinalysis, ultrasonography and a urodynamic test according to the International Continence Society standard. Outcomes Descriptive statistics were reported as mean and standard deviation for continuous variables (analyzed by independent samples Mann-Whitney U test and independent samples Kruskal-Wallis test) while categorical variables were reported as frequency and percentage (analyzed by chi-square test with Fisher's exact test). Results Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) total score and all FSFI subscales scores were significantly lower in patients with MS vs healthy control subjects (P <.001); FSFI total scores and all FSFI subscale scores were statistically significantly lower in patients with MS with an International Prostate Symptom Score ≥20 (P <.001) and considering a cutoff for Beck Depression Inventory–II score ≥17, depression was present in 61% (n = 47 of 77) of patients with MS and completely absent in the control group. Clinical Translation The knowledge that SDs are a common problem in MS and in other chronic illnesses can alleviate the feeling of stigma and talking openly of sexual problems can be helpful for the patients and so the doctor-patient relationship can be reinforced. Strengths and Limitations The sample was drawn from a single center, and larger multicenter studies that include both genders are needed to obtain strong results. Conclusion Our findings confirm the idea of a polygenic and multifactorial etiology of female SDs in MS. Therefore, women with MS should be evaluated in terms of SDs during follow-ups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) has always represented a major therapeutic challenge and the management of this type of incontinence is often complicated by uncertain outcomes. Surgical options include interventions targeting both stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urge urinary incontinence (UUI), although there are no international published guidelines that dictate whether it is better to start with surgical management to address the SUI or UUI component after the failure of conservative treatment. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Macroplastique (MPQ) procedure on overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms in women with MUI with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed in two tertiary reference centers. We enrolled all women complaining of symptoms of SUI and OAB, dry or wet, with a urodynamically confirmed diagnosis of MUI [urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) with detrusor overactivity (DO)], who took a previous ineffective antimuscarinic treatment and underwent the MPQ procedure. We considered as objectively cured women who did not leak urine during the stress test and with a 1 h pad-test negative, while International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire–Short Form (ICIQ-SF), ICIQ-OAB, Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale, and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to assess subjective outcomes. Results: A total of forty-six patients who met the inclusion criteria and who underwent the MPQ procedure were considered for the analysis. At the 1-year mark of follow-up, 72% of patients were objectively cured at stress test and 65% were objectively cured at pad-test, while 72% of women declared themselves subjectively cured. OAB symptoms significantly improved after MPQ and a complete resolution of OAB was recorded in 35% of patients. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that MPQ is a safe and effective option for the treatment of female MUI. Furthermore, MPQ significantly improves the symptoms of OAB and is able to completely cure this condition in a relevant percentage of women with MUI when pharmacological treatment fails. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: The use of tension-free vaginal tape obturator (TVT-O) for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has been widely debated over the last decade due to the lack of evidence on its long-term outcomes. The aim of this prospective study is to assess, for the first time in the available literature, the efficacy and safety of TVT-O implantation in women with pure SUI over a 17-year follow-up period. Methods: We included all women who complained of pure SUI symptoms (confirmed urodynamically) and underwent the TVT-O procedure. An objective cure was defined as the absence of urine leakage during the stress test, while subjective outcomes were assessed by means of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire—Short Form (ICIQ-SF), the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale, and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Results: A total of 70 patients who met the inclusion criteria underwent the TVT-O procedure. During the study period, no patients were lost to follow-up, and all women completed the last evaluation at the 17-year mark. At the 17-year mark of follow-up, 62 out of 70 patients (81.4%) were subjectively cured, and 56 out of 70 (80%) patients were objectively cured. These data do not reveal any significant variation in the surgical outcomes over the follow-up period. We recorded seven (10%) tape exposure (three occurred after 10 years and four after 17 years). Among these, one woman was symptomatic for dyspareunia and "hispareunia". All patients with mesh exposure were treated with partial removal and re-suture of the vagina, but only one developed the recurrence of SUI that required a second treatment with a urethral bulking agent (UBA). In all other cases, women reported a complete resolution of symptoms without any worsening of the urinary continence. No significant bladder or urethral erosion was recorded. Conclusions: The 17-year evaluation of the TVT-O procedure has shown that it is a highly effective and safe option for the treatment of female SUI. Although there was an increased risk of tape exposure 17 years after implantation, no serious complications were reported, and no patient required the total removal of the sling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Cervical cancer is among the most common cancers in women and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in females. In developing countries, 6% of diagnoses occur in the advanced stages of the disease. Locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is defined as stage IB2-IVA, according to the FIGO 2009 classification. Chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the preferred treatment, but 30% of patients relapse after treatment and may suffer from late toxicity. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radical surgery is a common but controversial option, as it can delay curative treatments. Adjuvant surgery after CCRT has shown promising results, with studies indicating potential benefits in disease control and survival rates. However, guidelines mainly suggest exclusive chemoradiotherapy, though a proportion of patients might need additional treatment with surgery. This study compares the oncological outcomes of LACC patients undergoing standard treatments versus those with adjuvant surgery post-CCRT or NACT. Initial findings suggest that adjuvant surgery could improve local control and overall survival in specific patient groups, though further research is needed to confirm these results. Background: The treatment of choice for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is definitive concurrent radio chemotherapy which consists of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy (CCRT), with the possible addition of brachytherapy (BT). However, the benefits of adjuvant surgery after neoadjuvant treatments remain a debated issue and a still open question in the literature. This meta-analysis aims to provide an updated view on the controversial topic, focusing on comparing surgery after any adjuvant treatment and standard treatment. Methods: Following the recommendations in the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement, the PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched in April 2023 for early publications. No limitations on the country were applied. Only English articles were considered. The comparative studies containing data about disease-free survival (DFS) and/or overall survival (OS) were included in the meta-analysis. Results: The CCRT + surgery group showed a significantly better DFS than CCRT (RR 0.69 [95% CI 0.58–0.81] p < 0.01) and a better OS (RR 0.70 [95% CI 0.55–0.89] p < 0.01). Nine studies comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) plus surgery and CCRT were also enrolled. The NACT + surgery group showed a significantly better DFS than CCRT (RR 0.66 [95% CI 0.45–0.97] p < 0.01) and a better OS (RR 0.56 [95% CI 0.38–0.83] p < 0.01). In the sub-analysis of three randomized control trials, the surgery group documented a non-significantly better DFS and OS than CCRT (OR 1.10 [95% CI 0.67–1.80] p = 0.72; I2 = 69% p = 0.72; OR 1.09 [95% CI 0.63–1.91] p = 0.75; I2 = 13% p = 0.32). Conclusion: The results provide updated findings about the efficacy of neoadjuvant treatments, indicating significantly improved DFS and OS in patients undergoing hysterectomy after CCRT or NACT compared with patients undergoing standard treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Transgender people are defined as individuals whose gender identity does not entirely match their sex assigned at birth. Gender surgery typically represents the conclusive and irreversible step in the therapeutic process, especially for the impact on the reproductive sphere. The increased awareness of gender dysphoria and the expanding array of medical and surgical options, including minimally invasive techniques, contribute to the gradual increase in the social impact of transgender surgery. There are several surgical techniques for "gender assignment", such as vaginal, laparotomic, laparoscopic, and robotic, and the novel approach of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery to perform a hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO). The purpose of this review is to assess the various surgical approaches (hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy) for gender reassignment in order to determine the best option in clinical practice for the female-to-male population in terms of surgical outcomes such as operative time, surgical complication, hospital discharge, postoperative pain, and bleeding. Materials and Methods: This systematic review includes studies from 2007 to 2024. Special consideration was given to articles documenting the characteristics and management of female-to-male reassignment surgery. Finally, eight papers were included in this review. Results: The literature analysis considered surgical techniques ranging from traditional surgery to innovative methods like vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy. Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and the robotic approach offer potential benefits such as reduced postoperative pain and shorter hospital stays. While vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery may encounter challenges due to narrow access and smaller vaginal dimensions, robotic single-site hysterectomy may face instrument conflict. Conclusions: The conventional laparoscopic approach remains widely used, demonstrating safety and efficacy. Overall, this review underscores the evolving landscape of surgical techniques for gender affirmation and emphasizes the necessity for personalized approaches to meet the specific needs of transgender patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Signs and symptoms of vulvovaginitis, especially when recurrent, have a significant impact on a woman's quality of life. The aim of this study was to survey gynecologists about their habits regarding the treatments of the pathology and to evaluate the efficacy of a novel vaginal hydrogel composed of wheat extracts and polyhexanide aimed at reducing vulvovaginitis symptomatology. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of a national survey using 155 Italian gynecologists and a prospective, open-label, observational study were carried out in 75 outpatient clinics across Italy. Pre- and postmenopausal women with suspicion of vulvovaginitis due to at least four of the following symptoms (leucoxanthorrhea, bad odor from genitalia, vulvovaginal dryness, petechiae, burning, and pruritus) while waiting for microbiological swab analysis were included and treated with one hydrogel application every 3 days for 1 week. Primary endpoint was the complete resolution of symptomatology. Results: The pre-study survey reported that, for most clinicians, local or oral treatment (65.7% and 82.8%, respectively) with antibiotics or antifungals is used very often. Therefore, we proceeded to carry out an observational study. Overall, 615 (362 of fertile age and 253 in postmenopause) women were included in this study. At the 28th follow-up examination, complete resolution of symptomatology was achieved in 578/615 (94.1%; p < 0.001) within 12.72 ± 6.55 and 13.22 ± 6.33 days for those of fertile age and in postmenopause, respectively (p = 0.342). All of the evaluated symptoms were significantly reduced after treatment (p = 0.001) without differences according to the patient's menopausal status. A slightly significant reduction in Gardnerella Vaginalis (p = 0.040) and Candida Albicans (p = 0.049) was found after treatment. No patient reported side effects, adverse reactions, or discontinued therapy. Conclusions: This pilot study showed that a hydrogel based on Rigenase® (wheat extract) and polyhexanide could be a promising treatment for the relief of vulvovaginitis symptoms. However, these results are limited by the absence of a control group. Additional comparative and randomized controlled trials between the hydrogel and other non-antibiotic devices as well as local antibiotic therapy should be performed to increase the validity of the findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]