Search

Objectives: Upper arm arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) occasionally develop high flow. Revision using distal inflow (RUDI) effectively reduces flow of high flow accesses (HFA) in the short-term and is also popularised for treatment of haemodialysis access induced distal ischaemia (HAIDI). The long-term efficacy is unknown. The study's aim was to report on 3 year RUDI patency and recurrence rates for HFA with and without HAIDI. Material and methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with a HFA with or without HAIDI undergoing RUDI using greater saphenous vein (GSV) interposition between March 2011 and October 2017 at three facilities. AVFs were termed HFA if flow volumes exceeded 2 L/min on two consecutive measurements using dilution techniques. HAIDI was diagnosed as recommended. Following RUDI, follow up was not different from standard care in AVF patients. Data on post-operative flows and re-interventions were extracted from electronic patient files. Loss to follow up was avoided. Rates of patency and HFA recurrence were analysed. Results: During the observation period, 21 patients were studied (7 females, 54 years +/- 3). Fourteen had uncomplicated HFA whereas seven had additional HAIDI. Immediately post-operatively, flows decreased threefold (3120 mL/min +/- 171 vs. 1170 mL/min +/- 87, p<. 001). Overall 3 year primary patency was 48% +/- 12 (HFA, 55% +/- 15 vs. HAIDI/HFA, 29% +/- 17, p = .042). Secondary patency was identical in both groups (overall, 84% +/- 9). Interventions were percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (n = 12, 9 patients), thrombectomy (n = 7, 3 patients), and revision with new interposition grafts (n = 3). After 3 years, 51% +/- 12 were free of high flow (HFA, 32% +/- 13 vs. HAIDI/HFA, 100%, p = .018). High immediate post-operative access flow predicted recurrence (OR 1.004 [1.000-1.007], p = .044). Patients with recurrence were 12 years younger than those without (p = .055). Conclusion: RUDI with GSV interposition for HFA offers

BACKGROUND: The rope-ladder puncture technique, with cannulation along the whole length of the vessel traject, has been very common in haemodialysis patients with autogenous arterio-venous fistula (AVF). Today's dialysis population with AVF may exhibit difficult cannulation, because of a short vein length or a complicated cannulation route. An alternative needling possibility is the buttonhole (BH) technique, which inserts needles at exactly the same location during every dialysis session. The present study was conducted to investigate the effect of both cannulation techniques on the incidence of vascular access (VA) complications. METHODS: A total of 75 prevalent haemodialysis patients with autogenous AVF using the BH technique were compared with 70 patients using the rope-ladder technique. The following parameters were registered: haematoma occurrence, redness, swelling, aneurysm formation, the use of sharp or dull needles, miscannulations, and interventions. Needling pain and fear of puncture were assessed using a verbal rating scale (VRS). The duration of the follow-up was 9 months. RESULTS: Patients in the BH group had more unsuccessful cannulations, compared with the rope-ladder method (P < 0.0001), but the frequency of haematoma (P < 0.0001) and aneurysm formation (P < 0.0001) was less. In addition, intervention such as angioplasty (P < 0.0001) was higher in patients using the rope-ladder technique. A negative outcome of the BH technique was the higher incidence of access infections compared to the rope-ladder method. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the BH method is a valuable technique with few complications like haematoma, aneurysm formation and the need for interventions. However, the infections induced by the BH method should not be underestimated. This underlines the importance of an aseptic and correct technique of the buttonhole procedure.