Search

Background: Topiramate is often considered as a second-line medication for the treatment of pseudotumor cerebri syndrome (PTCS), but limited studies exist that evaluate its efficacy in children., Methods: Retrospective study of patients aged <21 years with PTCS who were treated with topiramate alone or in combination with acetazolamide was performed. Data regarding clinical courses and visual outcomes were recorded., Results: A total of 46 patients were identified. Three (6.5%) patients were treated with topiramate alone, 31 (67.4%) transitioned to topiramate from acetazolamide, and 12 (26.1%) took both topiramate and acetazolamide concurrently. The median time to resolution of papilledema on topiramate was 0.57 years (interquartile range 0.32 to 0.84). Among eyes with papilledema graded on the Frisen scale at topiramate initiation, 40 of 57 (70.2%) were grade 1, nine of 57 (15.8%) were grade 2, and eight of 57 (14.0%) were grade 3. Twenty-seven of 46 (58.7%) reported headache improvement after starting topiramate. The mean dose of topiramate was 1.3 ± 0.8 mg/kg/day. The most common side effect was patient report of cognitive slowing (10 of 46 [21.7%]). All patients on topiramate monotherapy who were compliant with treatment and follow-up had resolution of papilledema with no evidence of visual function loss., Conclusions: Topiramate can effectively treat PTCS in children with mild to moderate papilledema or in those unable to tolerate acetazolamide. More research is needed to assess the efficacy of topiramate for higher grade papilledema., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A man in his 40s with a known history of alcohol dependence syndrome was admitted with presenting symptoms of alcohol withdrawal. During his admission, he developed breathlessness, cough and wheezing. Investigations revealed raised absolute eosinophil count and serum IgE levels. Chest imaging showed ill-defined opacities and fibreoptic bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage confirmed eosinophilic pneumonia. Extensive workup for the cause of eosinophilia was negative. The patient's medicines were reviewed, and it was realised that the onset of eosinophilia occurred after starting topiramate for an alcohol withdrawal seizure. The drug was stopped, leading to the complete resolution of symptoms and radiological abnormalities. This case highlights the importance of considering drug-induced causes of eosinophilic pneumonia., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Importance: Obesity affects approximately 19% of women and 14% of men worldwide and is associated with increased morbidity. Antiobesity medications (AOMs) modify biological processes that affect appetite and significantly improve outcomes, such as type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia., Observations: AOMs should be administered in combination with lifestyle interventions and can be classified according to their mechanisms of action. Orlistat modifies digestive tract absorption and causes gastrointestinal adverse effects, such as oily fecal spotting and urgency, in more than 25% of patients. Centrally acting drugs, such as phentermine-topiramate and naltrexone-bupropion, regulate appetite in the brain and are associated with constipation in approximately 20% of patients, although the incidence of other adverse effects (eg, paresthesia, nausea) varies by medication. Nutrient-stimulated hormone-based medications, such as liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide, mimic the actions of enteropancreatic hormones that modify central appetite regulation and provide multiple cardiometabolic weight-loss benefits. Adverse effects of these drugs include nausea (28%-44%), diarrhea (21%-30%), and constipation (11%-24%). The relative potency of adult obesity medications has been studied in meta-analyses. Compared with placebo, orlistat was associated with 3.1% greater weight loss (52 randomized clinical trials [RCTs]; 16 964 participants), phentermine-topiramate was associated with 8.0% greater weight loss (5 RCTs; 3407 participants), naltrexone-bupropion was associated with 4.1% greater weight loss (6 RCTs; 9949 participants), liraglutide was associated with 4.7% greater weight loss (18 RCTs; 6321 participants), semaglutide was associated with 11.4% greater weight loss (5 RCTs; 4421 participants), and tirzepatide 15 mg was associated with 12.4% greater weight loss (6 RCTs; 1972 participants)., Conclusion and Relevance: Obesity is associated with increased morbidity. Antiobesity medications are effective adjunctive therapy to lifestyle changes for improved weight loss and health outcomes.

Background: Drug-induced lupus erythematosus (DILE) is the development of lupus-like syndrome following a drug exposure. DILE has been reported less frequently among children than adults., Methods: In this study, we present four children with DILE and similar published cases through a systematic literature review., Results: We report four children (three girls and one boy) who developed DILE associated with the use of topiramate, doxycycline, etanercept, and ethosuximide. Three of them were positive for anti-histone antibodies. In all patients, the drug was discontinued and symptoms resolved completely. The literature review revealed 48 articles describing 61 children with DILE. In the evaluation of 65 patients (our 4 patients and 61 patients from the literature), the most frequently reported drugs associated with DILE were ethosuximide ( n = 13) and minocycline ( n = 12). Fever ( n = 33), arthralgia ( n = 31), rash ( n = 30), and arthritis ( n = 29) were the most common clinical manifestations. Antinuclear antibody (ANA) was positive in 93.5% of patients and anti-histone antibodies were detected in 72.2% of the patients. As for treatment, the responsible drug was discontinued in all patients, and corticosteroids were initiated in 53.3%. Improvement was achieved in 92.0% of patients., Conclusion: For children presenting with SLE features, proper drug history is crucial since DILE may be more frequent than anticipated. An association of the relevant drug with the symptoms, and resolution of symptoms on drug withdrawal provides evidence for the diagnosis of DILE., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Aims: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis with the aim of synthesizing existing data on the efficacy and safety of topiramate as an adjunctive treatment for reducing second-generation antipsychotic (SGA)-associated weight gain in children aged 4-18 years., Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, PsychNet and Web of Science from time of their inception up to 12 February 2024, including randomized controlled trials that compared SGA treatment with and without topiramate co-administration in children. The primary outcomes were changes in body weight and body mass index (BMI). Heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 statistics., Results: This systematic review included five randomized trials, totalling 139 participants (43.9% female; mean [SD] age 11.9 [3.5] years). Four of these trials were included in the meta-analysis, comprising 116 subjects. We found that topiramate was significantly effective both in reducing SGA-associated weight gain, with a mean difference of -2.80 kg (95% confidence interval [CI] -5.28 to -0.31; p = 0.037, I 2  = 86.7%) and a standardized mean difference (SMD) of -1.33 (95% CI -2.14 to -0.51; p = 0.014, I 2  = 31.7%), and in reducing BMI change compared to placebo (SMD -1.90, 95% CI -3.09 to -0.70; p = 0.02, I 2  = 0%). Sedation risk was lower with topiramate than with placebo (odds ratio 0.19, 95% CI 0.11-0.32; p < 0.01, I 2  = 0%). No significant differences were found in dropouts, any other side effects, and metabolic parameters, such as triglycerides, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, and glucose. None of the included studies reported assessments on cognitive side effects., Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that topiramate is an effective and safe option for mitigating SGA-associated weight gain in children., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: This study aimed to compare and characterize the safety profiles of new antiseizure medications (ASMs) using a nationwide pharmacovigilance database from a long-term perspective in Korea., Methods: We reviewed adverse event reports from the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System database between January 2013 and December 2022 for descriptive analysis of six new ASMs (lacosamide, levetiracetam, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, and zonisamide). We investigated the frequency and characteristics of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) based on the MedDRA terminology, system organ classes, and modified WHO classification., Results: We identified 5,733 reported cases of ADRs. The commonly reported ADRs associated with total ASMs were rash/urticaria (1,822, 31.8 %), dizziness (409, 7.1 %), somnolence/drowsiness (311, 5.4 %), and hepatotoxic effects (273, 4.8 %). Type B (idiosyncratic) effects (2,932; 51.1 %) were more commonly reported than Type A (related to known drug mechanisms) effects (2,613; 45.6 %). Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders and type B effects were most commonly reported for lamotrigine and oxcarbazepine, whereas nervous system disorders and type A effects were most commonly reported for lacosamide, topiramate, and zonisamide. The pediatric group (<18 years) exhibited skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders and type B effects relatively more frequently than the adult and older adult groups., Conclusion: Hypersensitivity skin reactions and type B effects remained significant ADRs in the new ASMs; however, type A effects were more commonly reported in some ASMs. The pediatric group showed a higher rate of type B effects. Overall, new ASMs should also be used with caution., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Maternal use of valproate during pregnancy has been associated with an increased risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in children. Although most studies of other antiseizure medications have not shown increased risks of these disorders, there are limited and conflicting data regarding the risk of autism spectrum disorder associated with maternal topiramate use., Methods: We identified a population-based cohort of pregnant women and their children within two health care utilization databases in the United States, with data from 2000 through 2020. Exposure to specific antiseizure medications was defined on the basis of prescription fills from gestational week 19 until delivery. Children who had been exposed to topiramate during the second half of pregnancy were compared with those unexposed to any antiseizure medication during pregnancy with respect to the risk of autism spectrum disorder. Valproate was used as a positive control, and lamotrigine was used as a negative control., Results: The estimated cumulative incidence of autism spectrum disorder at 8 years of age was 1.9% for the full population of children who had not been exposed to antiseizure medication (4,199,796 children). With restriction to children born to mothers with epilepsy, the incidence was 4.2% with no exposure to antiseizure medication (8815 children), 6.2% with exposure to topiramate (1030 children), 10.5% with exposure to valproate (800 children), and 4.1% with exposure to lamotrigine (4205 children). Propensity score-adjusted hazard ratios in a comparison with no exposure to antiseizure medication were 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 1.65) for exposure to topiramate, 2.67 (95% CI, 1.69 to 4.20) for exposure to valproate, and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.69 to 1.46) for exposure to lamotrigine., Conclusions: The incidence of autism spectrum disorder was higher among children prenatally exposed to the studied antiseizure medications than in the general population. However, after adjustment for indication and other confounders, the association was substantially attenuated for topiramate and lamotrigine, whereas an increased risk remained for valproate. (Funded by the National Institute of Mental Health.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Regulatory agencies have recently discouraged the prescription of topiramate (TPM) to women of childbearing potential with epilepsy due to growing evidence of the teratogenic and neurodevelopmental risks associated with its use during pregnancy. It remains, however, unclear whether the use of TPM in this population can be supported to some extent by its high effectiveness. In this multicenter, retrospective, cohort study performed at 22 epilepsy centers, we investigated the comparative effectiveness of TPM and levetiracetam (LEV) given as first-line antiseizure medication in a cohort of women of childbearing potential with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE). A total of 336 participants were included, of whom 24 (7.1%) received TPM and 312 (92.9%) LEV. Women treated with TPM had significantly higher risks of treatment failure and treatment withdrawal and were less likely to achieve seizure freedom at 12 months compared to women treated with LEV. In conclusion, this study highlighted a low tendency among clinicians to use TPM in women of childbearing potential with IGE, anticipating the recently released restrictions on its use. Furthermore, the available data on effectiveness do not appear to support the use of TPM in this population., (© 2024 International League Against Epilepsy.)

Topiramate (TPM), a GABA/glutamate modulator, has shown positive results for treating alcohol use disorder (AUD), but causes significant cognitive adverse effects. TPM causes cognitive side effects by reducing glutathione levels in the frontal lobe. N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) increases level of intracellular glutathione. We hypothesized that combining NAC with TPM may mitigate the possible cognitive side effects of TPM, as well as working synergistically in reducing alcohol consumption more efficaciously than using TPM alone. A 12-week, double-blind randomized trial assessing the effects of combining NAC (1200 mg/day) with TPM (200 mg/day) vs TPM alone (i) cognitive side effects caused by TPM, (ii) percentage of heavy drinking days (PHDD) and percentage of days abstinent (PDA) using weekly calendar, and (iii) craving outcomes using the obsessive-compulsive drinking scale. Seventeen participants were randomized into the study (nine received TPM + NAC and eight matching TPM + Placebo). Cognitive adverse events were not significantly different between the treatment arms (P = 0.581). There was no difference in PHDD (P = 0.536) and in PDA over the entire study period (P = 0.892). However, both treatment groups at study end, compared with the baseline, significantly reduced their PHDD and increased their PDA. As for cravings: TPM + NAC group has shown higher level in automaticity of drinking (P = 0.029) and interference due to drinking (P = 0.014) subscales compared with the TPM + Placebo group. No difference was observed between groups in terms of Drinking Obsessions and Alcohol Consumption subscales. This pilot study indicates that combining NAC with TPM is overall safe, but the addition of NAC has no significant benefit over placebo in the incidence of TPM-related cognitive impairment, and alcohol drinking. Furthermore, craving outcomes may become worse with the addition of NAC., (© The Author(s) 2023. Medical Council on Alcohol and Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Importance: Cryptogenic sensory peripheral neuropathy (CSPN) is highly prevalent and often disabling due to neuropathic pain. Metabolic syndrome and its components increase neuropathy risk. Diet and exercise have shown promise but are limited by poor adherence., Objective: To determine whether topiramate can slow decline in intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) and/or neuropathy-specific quality of life measured using the Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy (NQOL-DN) scale., Design, Setting, and Participants: Topiramate as a Disease-Modifying Therapy for CSPN (TopCSPN) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial conducted between February 2018 and October 2021. TopCSPN was performed at 20 sites in the National Institutes of Health-funded Network for Excellence in Neurosciences Clinical Trials (NeuroNEXT). Individuals with CSPN and metabolic syndrome aged 18 to 80 years were screened and randomly assigned by body mass index (<30 vs ≥30), which is calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. Patients were excluded if they had poorly controlled diabetes, prior topiramate treatment, recurrent nephrolithiasis, type 1 diabetes, use of insulin within 3 months before screening, history of foot ulceration, planned bariatric surgery, history of alcohol or drug overuse in the 2 years before screening, family history of a hereditary neuropathy, or an alternative neuropathy cause., Interventions: Participants received topiramate or matched placebo titrated to a maximum-tolerated dose of 100 mg per day., Main Outcomes and Measures: IENFD and NQOL-DN score were co-primary outcome measures. A positive study was defined as efficacy in both or efficacy in one and noninferiority in the other., Results: A total of 211 individuals were screened, and 132 were randomly assigned to treatment groups: 66 in the topiramate group and 66 in the placebo group. Age and sex were similar between groups (topiramate: mean [SD] age, 61 (10) years; 38 male [58%]; placebo: mean [SD] age, 62 (11) years; 44 male [67%]). The difference in change in IENFD and NQOL-DN score was noninferior but not superior in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (IENFD, 0.21 fibers/mm per year; 95% CI, -0.43 to ∞ fibers/mm per year and NQOL-DN score, -1.52 points per year; 95% CI, -∞ to 1.19 points per year). A per-protocol analysis excluding noncompliant participants based on serum topiramate levels and those with major protocol deviations demonstrated superiority in NQOL-DN score (-3.69 points per year; 95% CI, -∞ to -0.73 points per year). Patients treated with topiramate had a mean (SD) annual change in IENFD of 0.56 fibers/mm per year relative to placebo (95% CI, -0.21 to ∞ fibers/mm per year). Although IENFD was stable in the topiramate group compared with a decline consistent with expected natural history, this difference did not demonstrate superiority., Conclusion and Relevance: Topiramate did not slow IENFD decline or affect NQOL-DN score in the primary ITT analysis. Some participants were intolerant of topiramate. NQOL-DN score was superior among those compliant based on serum levels and without major protocol deviations., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02878798.

Objective: To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of topiramate for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in civilians., Methods: This 12-week double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study enrolled 72 outpatients (aged 19-64 years) with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of non-combat-related PTSD and a score ≥ 50 on the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS). The primary efficacy endpoint, percent change in total CAPS score, and secondary efficacy measures were assessed by analysis of covariance. Safety assessments included monitoring of vital signs, physical examinations, clinical laboratory parameters, electrocardiograms, and adverse events (AEs). The study was conducted from October 2001 to March 2004., Results: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population (N = 68; mean age = 35 years; 87% women; 74% White) showed greater percent reduction in total CAPS scores with topiramate versus placebo (39.5% vs 29.5%), but the difference was not statistically significant ( P  = .31). Similarly, higher reductions with topiramate versus placebo were seen in the CAPS subscale scores for symptoms of reexperiencing (43.6% vs 34.8%), avoidance/numbing (38.3% vs 30.6%), and hyperarousal (36.6% vs 21.4%). However, these differences were not statistically significant. Six patients in the topiramate arm had a final CAPS score < 20, whereas only 2 in the placebo arm achieved the result ( P  = .075). The median final topiramate daily dose was 100 mg/d (range, 25-400 mg/d), and mean ± SD treatment duration was 55 ± 32 days, showing the tolerability of the medication. In topiramate-treated patients, treatment-emergent AEs included paresthesia, headache, fatigue, and insomnia; treatment-limiting AEs included influenza-like symptoms, agitation, cognitive problems not otherwise specified, and somnolence. However, a higher rate of AE-related discontinuation was seen in the placebo group than in the treatment group (26% vs 18%)., Conclusions: In this 12-week civilian PTSD study, topiramate improved the primary and secondary outcome measures at a higher rate than did placebo, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Further adequately powered studies may be warranted., Trial Registration: Clinical Trials.gov identifier: NCT00208130., Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2023;25(5):23m03555 ., Author affiliations are listed at the end of this article., (© Copyright 2023 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.)

Objective: Topiramate is a repurposed first-line treatment for migraine prophylaxis. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to critically re-appraise the existing evidence supporting the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate., Methods: A systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed for trials of pharmacological treatment in migraine prophylaxis as of August 13, 2022, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA). Randomized controlled trials in adult patients that used topiramate for the prophylactic treatment of migraine, with placebo as active comparator, were included. Two reviewers independently screened the retrieved studies and extracted all data. Outcomes of interest were the 50% responder rates, the reduction in monthly migraine days, and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation. Results were pooled and meta-analyzed, with sensitivity analysis based on the risk of bias of the studies, the monthly migraine days at baseline, and the previous use of other prophylactic treatments. Certainty evidence was judged according to the GRADE framework., Results: Eight out of 10,826 studies fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria, accounting for 2,610 randomized patients. Six studies included patients with episodic migraine and two with chronic migraine. Topiramate dose ranged from 50 to 200 mg/day, and all studies included a placebo arm. There was a high certainty that topiramate: 1) increased the proportion of patients who achieved a 50% responder rate in monthly migraine days, compared to placebo [relative risk: 1.61 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.29-2.01); absolute risk difference: 168 more per 1,000 (95% CI: 80 to 278 more)]; 2) was associated with 0.99 (95% CI: 1.41-0.58) fewer migraine days than placebo; 3) and had a higher proportion of patients with adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation [absolute risk difference 80 patients more per 1,000 (95% CI: 20 to 140 more patients)]., Conclusions: There is high-quality evidence of the efficacy of topiramate in the prophylaxis of migraine, albeit its use poses a risk of adverse events that may lead to treatment discontinuation, with a negative effect on patient satisfaction and adherence to care., (© 2023. Springer-Verlag Italia S.r.l., part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Hyperammonemia can occur after acute overdose or chronic use of valproic acid (VPA). Although VPA-related hyperammonemic encephalopathy (VHE) is a rare complication of VPA therapy, early recognition of VHE and identifying its risk factors are important because VHE can lead to loss of consciousness and increased seizure frequency., Purpose: The purpose of our study is to evaluate the risk factors of hyperammonemia in epilepsy patients during treatment with VPA therapy., Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 1084 adult patients with epilepsy and enrolled 116 patients with VPA therapy who had results of blood levels of ammonia over a 3-year period. Hyperammonemia was defined as a blood ammonia level exceeding 80 µg/dL. Correlations of blood levels of ammonia with dosages and blood levels of VPA were evaluated. We further performed univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses to identify risk factors for hyperammonemia in epilepsy patients treated with VPA therapy., Results: Blood levels of ammonia were well correlated with dosages of VPA (p = 0.036), but not with blood levels of VPA (p = 0.463). Hyperammonemia was more common in patients with higher VPA dosage and higher total drug loads of concurrent antiseizure medications (ASMs). Hyperammonemia was also associated with the use of topiramate and phenobarbital. In multivariate analysis, we identified total drug load of ASMs (p = 0.003) and use of topiramate (p = 0.007) as independent predictors of hyperammonemia. Four patients (4/116, 3.4 %) had clinical symptoms of VHE. Three of them had hyperammonemia while the other patient had normal blood level of ammonia with a high blood level of VPA., Conclusion: Our study shows that higher total drug loads of concurrent ASMs and use of topiramate were independent risk factors of hyperammonemia in epilepsy patients with VPA therapy. Although the incidence of VHE was not high in our study, clinicians should be aware of this potential adverse effect of VPA therapy, especially in patients with polytherapy of ASMs including topiramate., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Atogepant, an oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, and topiramate, a commonly used oral antiepileptic, are approved as preventive migraine treatments. Given the distinct mechanisms of action of these treatments, it is possible that they may be coprescribed for migraine. This open-label, single-center, 2-cohort, phase 1 trial evaluated the potential pharmacokinetic (PK) 2-way drug-drug interactions (DDIs), safety, and tolerability of atogepant and topiramate in healthy adults. Participants received atogepant 60 mg once daily and topiramate 100 mg twice daily. Cohort 1 (N = 28) evaluated the effect of topiramate on the PK of atogepant; cohort 2 (N = 25) evaluated the effect of atogepant on the PK of topiramate. Potential DDIs were assessed using geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals calculated for maximum plasma drug concentration at steady state (C max,ss ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve during the dosing interval at steady state (AUC 0-tau,ss ). Additional PK parameters were assessed. Atogepant AUC 0-tau,ss and C max,ss decreased by 25% and 24%, respectively, with topiramate coadministration. Topiramate AUC 0-tau,ss and C max,ss decreased by 5% and 6%, respectively, with atogepant coadministration. The 25% reduction in atogepant exposure when coadministered with topiramate is not considered to be clinically relevant and would not require dose adjustments., (© 2023 AbbVie. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

This retrospective single-center study evaluated the change in required dosage of acetazolamide and topiramate before and after dural venous sinus stent placement (VSSP) for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Adults diagnosed with IIH who failed optimized medical management and were treated with VSSP were included. This study comprised 55 patients who underwent VSSP for the diagnosis of IIH. The median preprocedural dosage of acetazolamide and topiramate was 1,000 mg (range, 500-4,000 mg) and 100 mg (range, 0-200 mg), respectively, among patients able to tolerate the medications. The median postprocedural dosage of acetazolamide and topiramate was 375 mg (range, 0-4,000 mg), with a mean reduction of 52.9% (P = .001), and 0 mg (range, 0-200 mg), with a mean reduction of 45.9% (P = .005), respectively. Dural VSSP significantly reduced dosage requirements for acetazolamide and/or topiramate, potentially reducing the morbidity secondary to medication side effects., (Copyright © 2023 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: A recent study has demonstrated an increased risk of neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder, in individuals exposed to either valproate or topiramate monotherapy. Regulatory bodies have initiated a review to reassess the safety of topiramate exposure during pregnancy. These novel findings raise concerns regarding the recommendation of antiseizure medications in women of childbearing potential. This manuscript highlights current research defining concerns specific to the use of valproate and topiramate in women of childbearing potential., Areas Covered: This manuscript summarizes recent findings regarding the safety of valproate and topiramate when compared to alternative therapies for the preventative treatment of migraine in women of childbearing potential. The studies included in this review were selected following a comprehensive literature review of multiple relevant databases. All studies that were published within the past 15 years were considered for inclusion., Expert Opinion: The use of valproate and topiramate in women of childbearing potential should be highly discouraged. Our recommendations include a review of current prescribing guidelines, further public education regarding the neurodevelopmental and congenital risks associated with the use of valproate and topiramate, and an appeal for further research defining the safety of alternative medications for migraine prevention when intrauterine exposure is possible.

Current treatment options for feline epilepsy are limited to medications that require administration of multiple doses per day or administration of a capsule or large tablet. Expanding the current treatment options could improve patient and owner compliance and optimize seizure control. Topiramate has been used sparingly in veterinary medicine, and limited pharmacokinetic studies have focused on immediate release formulations in dogs. If effective and safe, topiramate extended-release (XR) could broaden the current treatment options for feline epilepsy. The aims of this two-phase study were to establish single-dose pharmacokinetics for topiramate XR in cats, identify a dosing regimen that maintains steady-state plasma drug concentrations within a reference range extrapolated from human medicine (5-20 μg/mL), and evaluate the safety of topiramate XR in cats following multidose administration. Topiramate XR administered orally at 10 mg/kg once daily for 30 days was sufficient to achieve the desired concentrations in all cats. While no clinically apparent adverse effects were observed, four out of eight cats developed subclinical anemia, calling into question the safety of topiramate XR with chronic administration. Further studies are necessary to better understand the potential adverse effects and overall efficacy of topiramate XR for the treatment of feline epilepsy., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: While there are several trials that support the efficacy of various drugs for migraine prophylaxis against placebo, there is limited evidence addressing the comparative safety and efficacy of these drugs. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to facilitate comparison between drugs for migraine prophylaxis., Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and clinicaltrials.gov from inception to August 13, 2022, for randomized trials of pharmacological treatments for migraine prophylaxis in adults. Reviewers worked independently and in duplicate to screen references, extract data, and assess risk of bias. We performed a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis and rated the certainty (quality) of evidence as either high, moderate, low, or very low using the GRADE approach., Results: We identified 74 eligible trials, reporting on 32,990 patients. We found high certainty evidence that monoclonal antibodies acting on the calcitonin gene related peptide or its receptor (CGRP(r)mAbs), gepants, and topiramate increase the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, compared to placebo. We found moderate certainty evidence that beta-blockers, valproate, and amitriptyline increase the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, and low certainty evidence that gabapentin may not be different from placebo. We found high certainty evidence that, compared to placebo, valproate and amitriptyline lead to substantial adverse events leading to discontinuation, moderate certainty evidence that topiramate, beta-blockers, and gabapentin increase adverse events leading to discontinuation, and moderate to high certainty evidence that (CGRP(r)mAbs) and gepants do not increase adverse events., Conclusions: (CGRP(r)mAbs) have the best safety and efficacy profile of all drugs for migraine prophylaxis, followed closely by gepants., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

We present a case of presumed topiramate-induced retinopathy in a 58-year-old woman who presented with progressive, bilateral visual loss following a 3- to 4-year history of oral topiramate intake for migraine. She reported difficulty with light adaptation, hemeralopia, and color desaturation. Her best-corrected visual acuity was 1/60 (20/1200) in the right eye and 6/18 (20/60) in the left eye, and she performed poorly on Ishihara color plate testing. Anterior segment examination was normal; dilated funduscopy showed mild macular pigmentary changes. Optical coherence tomography revealed subtle thinning and reduced reflectivity of the subfoveal ellipsoid zone and interdigitation zone bilaterally, associated with increased foveal autofluorescence. Humphrey visual field 24-2 revealed central defects. Electrodiagnostic testing showed a reduced and delayed b-wave and a normal a-wave on photopic full-field electroretinogram (ERG), with normal scotopic responses; multifocal ERG revealed reduced responses in the inner 10° in both eyes. She underwent extensive investigations including whole-body computed tomography and positron emission tomography scan, magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, uveitis screening, retinal autoantibody testing, and genetic testing on the retinal dystrophy panel to rule-out other causes for her presentation, all of which were normal or negative., (Copyright ©2023. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without expressed written permission of the Digital Journal of Ophthalmology is prohibited.)

Patients with epilepsy often show treatment-related psychiatric symptoms. Among the novel antiseizure medications (ASM), Perampanel (PER), Levetiracetam (LEV), and Topiramate (TPM) have been reported to have a relatively high frequency of psychiatric adverse events. However, these psychiatric symptoms are not identical; PER and LEV show adverse events of irritability and aggression, while TPM shows typical symptoms of depression and schizophrenia. It is important to understand the characteristics of these psychiatric adverse events to design appropriate treatment regimens for epileptic patients. (Received August 1, 2022; Accepted December 24, 2022; Published April 1, 2023).

Objective: Many women with epilepsy need to continue anti-seizure medications (ASMs) throughout pregnancy. The current study investigated adaptive behaviour outcomes in children exposed to topiramate in the womb., Method: An observational, cross-sectional study was designed, recruiting mother-child-pairs from the UK Epilepsy and Pregnancy Register (UKEPR). Health, developmental histories and Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale-Third Edition (VABS-III) assessments were administered via telephone by a blinded researcher, supplemented with prospectively collected pregnancy and medication information. Topiramate monotherapy exposed children were compared to VABS-III normative data as recruitment was disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic., Results: Thirty-four women with epilepsy from 135 (25%) initially agreed to participate in the study, of whom 26 women completed telephone interviews about their children (n = 28). Children ranged from 2.5 to 17 years of age at the time of assessment. Six topiramate-exposed children were born small for gestational age, and there were significant associations between birthweight, dose and VABS-III scores. Significantly lower scores were observed in topiramate-exposed children (n = 21) with a significant dose-response relationship established after adjustment for parental educational level. Daily mean dosage was 280.21 mg, with high dosages of topiramate associated with a 12-point reduction in VABS-III scores. Additionally, four topiramate-exposed children (19.05%) had diagnoses of Autism Spectrum Disorder, which was significantly higher than UK prevalence rates (1.1%)., Conclusions: The findings of poorer adaptive behaviour, higher incidence of ASD and associations with birth weight are of concern and require further validation and replication using larger prospectively-recruited samples and comparator cohorts. Implications for research and clinical practice are discussed., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dr Bromley's institution has received a consultancy fee from UCB Pharma for consultancy work completed on the topic of women's health. Dr John Craig is the Chair and lead of the UK Epilepsy and Pregnancy Register which has received funding from a number of pharmaceutical companies. He has received grants to undertake research and honoraria for giving lectures from UCB-Pharma, Sanofi-Synthelabo, Glaxo Smith Kline, Janssen-Cilag, Pfizer and Eisai, (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Topiramate (TPM) is effective for treating epilepsy, but executive dysfunction is a common side effect that could significantly affect everyday life. Additionally, previous studies have suggested that patients might be unaware of these changes., Objective: To evaluate a rapid TPM titration scheme for the early detection of adverse cognitive side effects., Methods: In this retrospective study, we assessed changes in objective cognitive performance (EpiTrack ® ) after rapidly titrating TPM (50 mg per day during an inpatient stay) in 49 epilepsy patients and compared those results with an outpatient control group that underwent the recommended standard titration (n = 23 with 25-50 mg per week)., Results: Using Bayesian statistics, analyses revealed decisive evidence of a negative effect on cognitive performance when TPM was introduced (BF 31480000000) independent of the titration speed (BF 0.739). When using a fast titration rate, deficits in executive function increased from a baseline of 53.1 to 73.5% at follow-up, and 55.1% experienced a statistically significant intraindividual decline. When using the standard titration scheme, impairments increased from 52.2 to 65.2%, with an intraindividual deterioration found in 52.2% of the patients., Conclusion: Physicians might be able to detect adverse cognitive side effects sooner in epilepsy patients if TPM is administered using a faster titration rate while applying repeated cognitive assessments within days. This approach might help prevent any unnoticed intolerance and eventual negative consequences for the patient. Therefore, we recommend monitoring early on for adverse changes instead of withholding a potentially effective treatment option because of anticipated side effects., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Overview of: Bjørk MH, Zoega H, Leinonen MK, et al Association of prenatal exposure to antiseizure medication with risk of autism and intellectual disability. JAMA Neurol 2022;79:672-81., (© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The global incidence of childhood obesity is increasing. Currently, there are only few established drugs for treating adolescent obesity. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing pharmacological interventions in children with obesity are scarce; therefore, we aimed to analyze the relative efficacy and adverse reactions of these drugs and compare the effects of each drug on body mass index (BMI)., Research Design and Methods: This meta-analysis focused on the slimming effect, safety, and correlation of metformin, orlistat, exenatide, liraglutide, and topiramate in children with obesity. Several international databases were searched and clinical trials on the treatment of obesity in children in which the drug was administered for ≥ 6 months were included. Changes in BMI before and after treatment were analyzed using a Bayes framework, and the surface under the cumulative ranking was calculated., Results: Of 2102 relevant articles retrieved, 21 RCTs were included in the study. Compared to other drugs, liraglutide reduced BMI the most in children with obesity. However, it was most associated with drug withdrawal due to adverse events while topiramate was least., Conclusions: Liraglutide had a higher probability of achieving clinically significant weight loss compared with other drugs while topiramate was superior in safety.

Introduction: Anti-seizure drugs have long been known to affect thyroid hormone levels in epilepsy patients. The current study is a network meta-analysis designed to produce a systematic review and comprehensive evaluation of thyroid hormone changes to inform future research and clinical treatment., Method: A systematic search of databases, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, was conducted and all observational studies reporting thyroid hormone levels in epilepsy patients receiving monotherapy and controls were included. Stata MP.14 was used for analysis., Results: A total of 35 studies, including 4135 participants and 8 anti-seizure drugs, were analyzed. TSH levels were elevated following use of topiramate [mean = 1.86; 95%CI: 0.83 to 2.90], levetiracetam [mean = 1.08; 95%CI: 0.07 to 2.09], and valproic acid [mean = 1.54; 95%CI: 0.58 to 2.50]. FT4 levels may be lowered by oxcarbazepine [mean =  - 6.13; 95%CI: - 8.25 to - 4.02] and T4 was lowered by carbamazepine [mean =  - 1.55; 95%CI: - 2.05 to - 1.05] and phenytoin [mean =  - 1.33; 95%CI: - 1.80 to - 0.85]. No significant changes were reported for FT3, although use of phenobarbital resulted in a non-significant decrease [mean =  - 0.31; 95%CI: - 0.99 to 0.37]. T3 levels were lowered by carbamazepine [mean =  - 0.52; 95%CI: - 0.81 to - 0.24]. Lamotrigine had no significant effect on thyroid hormone levels., Conclusion: Carbamazepine and phenytoin were the drugs most strongly associated with decreases in T4 and T3 levels while topiramate had the greatest elevating effect on TSH. Oxcarbazepine may lead to decreased serum FT4 and FT3, an effect relevant to central hypothyroidism. Phenobarbital appeared to significantly lower FT3. Use of levetiracetam and valproic acid may result in subclinical hypothyroidism. The anti-seizure drug with the least disruptive effect on thyroid hormone levels was found to be lamotrigine., (© 2022. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.)

Objective: To understand the metabolic disturbances of stone formers currently taking topiramate and to examine the reversibility of these disturbances with cessation of the medication., Materials and Methods: All progress notes written by 5 endourologists from a single academic center were retrospectively reviewed from January 2010 to July 2020 containing the words "topiramate" or "topamax." Inclusion criteria were age >18 and presence of either a 24-hour urine sample or stone analysis while on topiramate. In addition, a subgroup of 18 patients with 24-hour urine samples before and after stopping topiramate were identified., Results: A total of 93 patients were identified and included for final analysis. Twenty-four hour urine samples were available in 67 patients and showed mean citrate excretion of 331 ± 322 mg/d, mean pH of 6.6 ± 0.5, and mean calcium phosphate supersaturation of 1.9 ± 1.1. In the subgroup analysis urinary citrate excretion increased from 225 mg/d to 614 mg/d (P <.01) and pH decreased from 6.59 ± 0.54 to 6.33 ± 0.47 (P = .06) after stopping topiramate. In addition, 114 stone events occurred in 73 distinct patients, with 50% of stones either pure or majority (≥50%) calcium phosphate by composition., Conclusion: Hypocitraturia and elevated pH is seen during topiramate use with resultant higher rate of calcium phosphate stone formation compared to the general population. Stopping topiramate leads to significant increase in citrate excretion and normalization of pH. These metabolic disturbances appear to be reversible with medication cessation., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Topiramate-induced acute angle closure (TiAAC) is a potentially vision-threatening side effect of topiramate (TPM) use. The purpose of this article is to review demographic characteristics, clinical features, and management options of TiAAC. A systematic literature search of all reported cases and case series of TiAAC was conducted in the following search engines: PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Elsevier, and EBSCO. Seventy-three publications describing 77 cases were included. 58 (75.3%) patients were female, and the mean age was 34.88 ± 11.21 years (range, 7-57). The most commonly reported indication of TPM use was migraine headache (59.7%), and the mean duration from starting treatment until the onset of angle closure was 14.1 ± 31.5 days. All cases were managed by immediate cessation of TPM and topical therapy. In addition, systemic medications (carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, hyperosmotic agents, and steroids) were used in 51 patients (66.2%). A laser and/or surgical intervention was performed in 10 patients (13%). After commencement of treatment, the mean duration until the resolution of TiAAC was 3.9 ± 3.6 days (range, 1-18). The findings of our study present a summary of the current body of evidence provided by case reports and case series on TiAAC. In conclusion, the onset of angle closure following TPM use peaks at 2 weeks after initiating treatment, and in most cases, successful management can be achieved by discontinuing TPM and initiating appropriate medical therapy., Competing Interests: None

Topiramate (TPM) is widely used as monotherapy or add-on therapy in adults and children (aged 2 to 16 years) with primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures or focal-onset seizures. TPM has also expanded its treatment spectrum to other seizure types and epileptic encephalopathies. Moreover, TPM has beneficial effects in some comorbidities of epilepsy such as migraine/headache and obesity. Interestingly, it also exhibited neuroprotective effects in several preclinical studies. The most common side effects of TPM are generally mild to moderate, including somnolence, dizziness, fatigue, insomnia and weight loss, which may be reduced through starting with a low dose and slowing titration to effective dosages. The mechanisms underlying the antiepileptic effect and adverse reactions of TPM have been extensively studied in the past 14 years since the last comprehensive review of TPM. Multiple mechanisms including but not limited to: (1) blockade of voltage-gated Na + channels, (2) inhibition of voltage-gated Ca 2+ channels, (3) inhibition of glutamate-mediated neurotransmission, (4) inhibition of carbonic anhydrase isoenzyme, as well as (5) enhancement of GABA-mediated neurotransmission are involved in its antiepileptic effect. In this review, we aim to summarize the mechanisms, clinical benefits and adverse reactions of TPM in epilepsy treatment, and to briefly discuss the prospects of TPM., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: A previously published, single-institution, case series suggested an association between topiramate administration in neonates and subsequent development of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). This contradicted our more extensive experiences using topiramate in this population. We therefore studied safety and tolerability of topiramate for treating refractory neonatal seizures, hypothesizing that the risk of developing NEC following topiramate exposure was low and that most infants tolerate topiramate., Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included seventy-five neonates who received topiramate to treat seizures from January 2011 to October 2019 at three geographically diverse level IV neonatal intensive care units affiliated with pediatric tertiary hospitals. Data included demographics, birth history, seizure etiology, treatment response, side effects, and occurrence and details of NEC., Results: Three of seventy-five infants (4%) developed NEC following topiramate exposure. These infants did not differ in gestational age, birth weight, seizure etiology, postmenstrual age, weight when topiramate was initiated, or dosing of topiramate. Topiramate was well tolerated. Only three infants (4%) discontinued due to side effects. The most common side effect (20%) was weight loss (typically <5%). Topiramate was felt to be efficacious (61%). Most infants (72%) continued topiramate when discharged., Conclusions: Our multicenter, 75-infant study demonstrated that development of NEC after treatment with topiramate was rare (4%) and refutes prior literature suggesting an association. Topiramate was felt to be efficacious and was well tolerated. Although limited by retrospective design, study data are broadly applicable and support thoughtful use of topiramate as a safe, reasonable option for treating refractory neonatal seizures., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Topamax (topiramate) is a drug used in the treatment of epilepsy or migraine. Its use may rarely be associated with the occurrence of secondary angle-closure glaucoma due to supraciliary effusion. Although the ocular finding resembles primary angle-closure glaucoma, bilateral infliction should always raise the suspicion that it is drug-induced glaucoma., Case Report: The authors present a case of a 51-year-old patient on Topamax therapy with sudden vertigo, headache and blurred vision. Ophthalmic examination revealed bilateral angle-closure glaucoma, which was initially treated in the classical manner by administration of local antiglaucoma drugs and pilocarpine, followed by administration of osmotically active substances and laser iridotomy. Only the subsequent discontinuation of Topamax and the use of local cycloplegics and corticosteroids led to the release of the anterior segment angle closure and normalization of intraocular pressure., Conclusion: The indicating physician and ophthalmologist must be aware of the possible side effects of Topamax therapy to determine the correct diagnosis and to administer treatment appropriately.

Aims: The Norwegian Association for Clinical Pharmacology in their National Guidelines decreased the therapeutic range (TR) of topiramate (TPM) from 5-20 mg/L to 2-10 mg/L. The objective of this study is to ascertain which TR produces better clinical outcomes., Methods: The data sources were request forms for routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of TPM. Concentration dependent adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were evaluated in 1721 samples taken pre-dose. Seizure frequency analysis was performed in 294 samples of monotherapy. Statistical analysis was performed using Prism 5.0, GraphPad Instatt: One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for median plasma level (PL) and χ 2 -test with Bonferroni correction for seizure frequency and for distribution of PL according to TR 5-20 mg/L and intervals <2, 2-5, 5-10, 10-20, >20 mg/L., Results: Better seizure control was found in children both in the whole cohort (without seizure 49% vs 37% adults), as well as in monotherapy (56% vs 44%), in children with PL 5-20 mg/L vs <5 mg/L (65% vs 44%) and in children with PL 5-10 mg/L vs <2 mg/L (63 vs 14%). PL in seizure-free patients did not differ from those with seizure. Seizure control was poorer in the period 2003-2005 compared to 2006-2011. ADRs reported in 38 samples (2.8%) were not related to PL., Conclusions: Change of TR is not recommended., (© 2021 British Pharmacological Society.)

Impulsivity is an important transdiagnostic feature of many psychiatric disorders, as well as a marker of poorer outcome. Topiramate is broadly used for reducing impulsivity in various neuropsychiatric disorders, but no systematic review or meta-analysis has ever explored whether evidence supports this clinical use. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature, using PubMed, PsycInfo and Cochrane databases. We included all studies assessing the efficacy of topiramate in adults with high levels of impulsivity, based on either psychometric or neuropsychological measures. Seven articles were included, involving 578 participants. Important heterogeneity in designs and quality features was observed. Topiramate lowered impulsivity levels in two of the studies that used the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS) (401 participants) and in one of the studies that used neuropsychological measures (63 participants). Four other studies found no effect of topiramate on impulsivity. A larger reduction in the BIS-11 overall score, with a mean difference of 2.57 (95% confidence interval -4.12 to -1.02), was found in the topiramate group than the placebo group using a random effects model. However, one study accounted for the major part (85.5%) of it, and most included studies presented a high risk of bias. The use of a self-assessment scale induced an additional risk of self-report bias. No clear-cut evidence was found for a transdiagnostic effectiveness of topiramate in reducing impulsivity levels. However, encouraging results were found in some specific disorders., (© 2021 Société Française de Pharmacologie et de Thérapeutique.)

A 42-year-old female patient with epilepsy and a co-morbid migraine suffered from the severe cognitive side effects of topiramate (TPM) for more than 16 years with detrimental consequences for her daily functioning, career, and social interaction. Even a prodromal stage of dementia was suggested, giving rise to fears of developing a neurodegenerative disease. Recently, cognitive monitoring of attention and executive function before and after withdrawal of TPM revealed a significant recovery from the severe negative cognitive side effects of the long-standing and inefficacious antiseizure medication (ASM). Whereas the side effects were reversible after cessation, their consequences for the patient`s biography were permanent. A considerable increase in quality of life, however, was observed without TPM and family members were impressed by the improvements. This case illustrates the potentially severe consequences of negative cognitive side effects which affect daily functioning, career and social life, thus underscoring the importance of being knowledgeable of the potential cognitive risks when prescribing an ASM. Because cognitive side effects may not depend solely on ASM choice and drug load, but also on individual idiosyncratic intolerances, and patients might stay on their treatment for many years, cognitive monitoring is highly recommended.

Background: Migraine is the primary cause of headache in children. Most patients can be treated with lifestyle changes and acute attack prophylaxis. Prophylaxis should be considered when symptoms cause frequent school absenteeism, poor quality of life, recurring emergency room visits, and frequent analgesic use. We aimed to compare the efficacy and side effects of drugs used in migraine prophylaxis, chosen according to the clinical and/or demographic characteristics of the patients., Methods: One hundred eighty-six patients aged 6-18 years were evaluated and who were diagnosed with migraine according to The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition beta version (ICH-3β). Propranolol, topiramate, flunarizine, and cyproheptadine were given as prophylactic treatment. The Pediatric Migraine Disability Assessment Score (PedMIDAS) score, severity, duration, and frequency of the headache attacks were evaluated from the medical records and pre- and post-treatment values were compared., Results: The median age of the patients was 14 years (range, 6-18 years) and the mean duration of headache was 29.6 ± 21.02 months. The mean PedMIDAS score was 29.9 ± 21.2 before and 14.9 ± 12.5 after treatment. Most reduction in the frequency of attacks was observed in the topiramate group. All four drugs significantly reduced the PedMIDAS score. The most common side effect was palpitations., Conclusions: Significant improvement was found in PedMIDAS scores in all drug groups. Topiramate was found to be the most effective drug in reducing the frequency of attacks. All four drugs in this study may be utilized for migraine prophylaxis in terms of effectiveness and safety., (© 2021 Japan Pediatric Society.)

Introduction: Relative to migraine generally, chronic migraine (CM) imposes greater disability, healthcare utilization and socioeconomic burden. Six therapies currently possess a credible evidence base for prevention/suppression of CM. This review is intended to provide an assessment of their relative utility, defined as a blend of safety, tolerability and efficacy, focusing in particular on their safety and tolerability.Areas Covered: We discuss all six medications currently FDA-approved for migraine prevention which also specifically possess credible evidence of efficacy in treating CM. While we do address the efficacy of each, our primary emphasis involves assessment of safety and tolerability data derived from clinical trials and post-marketing experience.Expert Opinion: Recent research involving CM has led to the identification of highly targeted and typically well-tolerated therapies. For patients who experience obstacles to accessing these newer therapies, topiramate is available as an evidence-based alternative, but contraindications, drug-drug interactions and poor tolerability may limit or prevent its use. Although data to support such intervention presently is limited, clinically challenging CM cases may benefit from combination therapy. 'Real world' studies are needed to evaluate such polytherapy, along with studies intended to assess the long-term safety of the individual therapies and their use during pregnancy and breast-feeding.

Central pontine myelinolysis (CPM) develops due to acute hypernatremia from a normal baseline serum sodium in the setting of electrolyte abnormalities induced by topiramate use. Topiramate is a commonly used medication with several indications including migraines, myoclonic jerks and seizures. It has been reported to cause renal tubular acidosis and severe electrolyte abnormalities, which in turn predispose patients to neuropathology via renal concentration defects and osmotic shifts. Our patient is a 55-year-old woman with a history of multiple sclerosis and myoclonus on topiramate for several years who presented with weakness and was found to be profoundly hypokalemic. She went on to develop changes in mental status, motor deficits and evidence of CPM on MRI during her hospitalisation. Surprisingly, the patient never had hyponatremia; however, she had an acute rise in serum sodium from a normal baseline after fluid resuscitation with normal saline for hypotension during her admission., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Topiramate is a newer broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED). Some studies have shown the benefits of topiramate in the treatment of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). However, there are no current systematic reviews to determine the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in people with JME. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2015, and last updated in 2019., Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in the treatment of JME., Search Methods: For the latest update, we searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web) on 26 August 2021, and MEDLINE (Ovid 1946 to 26 August 2021). CRS Web includes randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials from PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the Specialized Registers of Cochrane Review Groups, including Cochrane Epilepsy., Selection Criteria: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating topiramate versus placebo or other AED treatment for people with JME, with the outcomes of proportion of responders and proportion of participants experiencing adverse events (AEs)., Data Collection and Analysis: Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of identified records, selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, cross-checked the data for accuracy and assessed the methodological quality of the studies., Main Results: We included three studies with a total of 83 participants. For efficacy, a greater proportion of participants in the topiramate group had a 50% or greater reduction in primarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS), compared with participants in the placebo group (RR 4.00, 95% CI 1.08 to 14.75; 1 study, 22 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There were no significant differences between topiramate and valproate for participants responding with a 50% or greater reduction in myoclonic seizures (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.15; one study, 23 participants; very-low certainty evidence) or in PGTCS (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.68 to 2.21; one study, 16 participants, very-low certainty evidence), or participants becoming seizure-free (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.61 to 2.11; one study, 27 participants; very-low certainty evidence). Concerning tolerability, we ranked AEs associated with topiramate as moderate to severe, while we ranked 59% of AEs linked to valproate as severe complaints (2 studies, 61 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Moreover, systemic toxicity scores were higher in the valproate group than the topiramate group. Overall we judged all three studies to be at high risk of attrition bias and at unclear risk of reporting bias. We judged the studies to be at low to unclear risk of bias for the remaining domains (selection bias, performance bias, detection bias and other bias). We judged the overall certainty of the evidence for the outcomes as very low using the GRADE approach., Authors' Conclusions: We have found no new studies since the last version of this review was published in 2019. This review does not provide sufficient evidence to support topiramate for the treatment of people with JME. Based on the current limited available data, topiramate seems to be better tolerated than valproate, but has no clear benefits over valproate in terms of efficacy. Well-designed, double-blind RCTs with large samples are required to test the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in people with JME., (Copyright © 2021 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)