Search

Abstract Adoptive immunotherapy in the T cell landscape exhibits efficacy in cancer treatment. Over the past few decades, genetically modified T cells, particularly chimeric antigen receptor T cells, have enabled remarkable strides in the treatment of hematological malignancies. Besides, extensive exploration of multiple antigens for the treatment of solid tumors has led to clinical interest in the potential of T cells expressing the engineered T cell receptor (TCR). TCR-T cells possess the capacity to recognize intracellular antigen families and maintain the intrinsic properties of TCRs in terms of affinity to target epitopes and signal transduction. Recent research has provided critical insight into their capability and therapeutic targets for multiple refractory solid tumors, but also exposes some challenges for durable efficacy. In this review, we describe the screening and identification of available tumor antigens, and the acquisition and optimization of TCRs for TCR-T cell therapy. Furthermore, we summarize the complete flow from laboratory to clinical applications of TCR-T cells. Last, we emerge future prospects for improving therapeutic efficacy in cancer world with combination therapies or TCR-T derived products. In conclusion, this review depicts our current understanding of TCR-T cell therapy in solid neoplasms, and provides new perspectives for expanding its clinical applications and improving therapeutic efficacy.

Abstract Metabolic reprogramming of amino acids has been increasingly recognized to initiate and fuel tumorigenesis and survival. Therefore, there is emerging interest in the application of amino acid metabolic strategies in antitumor therapy. Tremendous efforts have been made to develop amino acid metabolic node interventions such as amino acid antagonists and targeting amino acid transporters, key enzymes of amino acid metabolism, and common downstream pathways of amino acid metabolism. In addition to playing an essential role in sustaining tumor growth, new technologies and studies has revealed amino acid metabolic reprograming to have wide implications in the regulation of antitumor immune responses. Specifically, extensive crosstalk between amino acid metabolism and T cell immunity has been reported. Tumor cells can inhibit T cell immunity by depleting amino acids in the microenvironment through nutrient competition, and toxic metabolites of amino acids can also inhibit T cell function. In addition, amino acids can interfere with T cells by regulating glucose and lipid metabolism. This crucial crosstalk inspires the exploitation of novel strategies of immunotherapy enhancement and combination, owing to the unprecedented benefits of immunotherapy and the limited population it can benefit. Herein, we review recent findings related to the crosstalk between amino acid metabolism and T cell immunity. We also describe possible approaches to intervene in amino acid metabolic pathways by targeting various signaling nodes. Novel efforts to combine with and unleash potential immunotherapy are also discussed. Hopefully, some strategies that take the lead in the pipeline may soon be used for the common good.

Abstract Background Diversified histone deacetylation inhibitors (HDACis) have demonstrated encouraging outcomes in multiple malignancies. N6‐methyladenine (m6A) is the most prevalent messenger RNA modification that plays an essential role in the regulation of tumorigenesis. Howbeit, an in‐depth understanding of the crosstalk between histone acetylation and m6A RNA modifications remains enigmatic. This study aimed to explore the role of histone acetylation and m6A modifications in the regulation of tumorigenesis of ocular melanoma. Methods Histone modification inhibitor screening was used to explore the effects of HDACis on ocular melanoma cells. Dot blot assay was used to detect the global m6A RNA modification level. Multi‐omics assays, including RNA‐sequencing, cleavage under targets and tagmentation, single‐cell sequencing, methylated RNA immunoprecipitation‐sequencing (meRIP‐seq), and m6A individual nucleotide resolution cross‐linking and immunoprecipitation‐sequencing (miCLIP‐seq), were performed to reveal the mechanisms of HDACis on methyltransferase‐like 14 (METTL14) and FAT tumor suppressor homolog 4 (FAT4) in ocular melanoma. Quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), western blotting, and immunofluorescent staining were applied to detect the expression of METTL14 and FAT4 in ocular melanoma cells and tissues. Cell models and orthotopic xenograft models were established to determine the roles of METTL14 and FAT4 in the growth of ocular melanoma. RNA‐binding protein immunoprecipitation‐qPCR, meRIP‐seq, miCLIP‐seq, and RNA stability assay were adopted to investigate the mechanism by which m6A levels of FAT4 were affected. Results First, we found that ocular melanoma cells presented vulnerability towards HDACis. HDACis triggered the elevation of m6A RNA modification in ocular melanoma. Further studies revealed that METTL14 served as a downstream candidate for HDACis. METTL14 was silenced by the hypo‐histone acetylation status, whereas HDACi restored the normal histone acetylation level of METTL14, thereby inducing its expression. Subsequently, METTL14 served as a tumor suppressor by promoting the expression of FAT4, a tumor suppressor, in a m6A‐YTH N6‐methyladenosine RNA‐binding protein 1‐dependent manner. Taken together, we found that HDACi restored the histone acetylation level of METTL14 and subsequently elicited METTL14‐mediated m6A modification in tumorigenesis. Conclusions These results demonstrate that HDACis exert anti‐cancer effects by orchestrating m6A modification, which unveiling a “histone‐RNA crosstalk” of the HDAC/METTL14/FAT4 epigenetic cascade in ocular melanoma.

Abstract Reversible, spatial, and temporal regulation of metabolic reprogramming and epigenetic homeostasis are prominent hallmarks of carcinogenesis. Cancer cells reprogram their metabolism to meet the high bioenergetic and biosynthetic demands for vigorous proliferation. Epigenetic dysregulation is a common feature of human cancers, which contributes to tumorigenesis and maintenance of the malignant phenotypes by regulating gene expression. The epigenome is sensitive to metabolic changes. Metabolism produces various metabolites that are substrates, cofactors, or inhibitors of epigenetic enzymes. Alterations in metabolic pathways and fluctuations in intermediate metabolites convey information regarding the intracellular metabolic status into the nucleus by modulating the activity of epigenetic enzymes and thus remodeling the epigenetic landscape, inducing transcriptional responses to heterogeneous metabolic requirements. Cancer metabolism is regulated by epigenetic machinery at both transcriptional and post‐transcriptional levels. Epigenetic modifiers, chromatin remodelers and non‐coding RNAs are integral contributors to the regulatory networks involved in cancer metabolism, facilitating malignant transformation. However, the significance of the close connection between metabolism and epigenetics in the context of cancer has not been fully deciphered. Thus, it will be constructive to summarize and update the emerging new evidence supporting this bidirectional crosstalk and deeply assess how the crosstalk between metabolic reprogramming and epigenetic abnormalities could be exploited to optimize treatment paradigms and establish new therapeutic options. In this review, we summarize the central mechanisms by which epigenetics and metabolism reciprocally modulate each other in cancer and elaborate upon and update the major contributions of the interplays between epigenetic aberrations and metabolic rewiring to cancer initiation and development. Finally, we highlight the potential therapeutic opportunities for hematological malignancies and solid tumors by targeting this epigenetic‐metabolic circuit. In summary, we endeavored to depict the current understanding of the coordination between these fundamental abnormalities more comprehensively and provide new perspectives for utilizing metabolic and epigenetic targets for cancer treatment.

Abstract Extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA), ranging in size from tens to millions of base pairs, is independent of conventional chromosomes. Recently, eccDNAs have been considered an unanticipated major source of somatic rearrangements, contributing to genomic remodeling through chimeric circularization and reintegration of circular DNA into the linear genome. In addition, the origin of eccDNA is considered to be associated with essential chromatin-related events, including the formation of super-enhancers and DNA repair machineries. Moreover, our understanding of the properties and functions of eccDNA has continuously and greatly expanded. Emerging investigations demonstrate that eccDNAs serve as multifunctional molecules in various organisms during diversified biological processes, such as epigenetic remodeling, telomere trimming, and the regulation of canonical signaling pathways. Importantly, its special distribution potentiates eccDNA as a measurable biomarker in many diseases, especially cancers. The loss of eccDNA homeostasis facilitates tumor initiation, malignant progression, and heterogeneous evolution in many cancers. An in-depth understanding of eccDNA provides novel insights for precision cancer treatment. In this review, we summarized the discovery history of eccDNA, discussed the biogenesis, characteristics, and functions of eccDNA. Moreover, we emphasized the role of eccDNA during tumor pathogenesis and malignant evolution. Therapeutically, we summarized potential clinical applications that target aberrant eccDNA in multiple diseases.

The pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) branches from glucose 6-phosphate (G6P), produces NADPH and ribose 5-phosphate (R5P), and shunts carbons back to the glycolytic or gluconeogenic pathway. The PPP has been demonstrated to be a major regulator for cellular reduction-oxidation (redox) homeostasis and biosynthesis. Enzymes in the PPP are reported to play important roles in many human diseases. In this review, we will discuss the role of the PPP in type 2 diabetes and cancer.