Search

Background: Off road mountain biking is now an extremely popular recreation and a potent cause of serious injury.Aim: To establish the morbidity associated with this sport.Methods: Data were collected prospectively over one year on all patients presenting with an injury caused by either recreational or competitive off road mountain biking.Results: Eighty four patients were identified, 70 males and 14 females, with a mean age of 22.5 years (range 8-71). Most accidents occurred during the summer months, most commonly in August. Each patient had an average of 1.6 injuries (n = 133) and these were divided into 15 categories, ranging from minor soft tissue to potentially life threatening. Operative intervention was indicated for 19 patients (23%) and several required multiple procedures. The commonest injuries were clavicle fractures (13%), shoulder injuries (12%), and distal radial fractures (11%). However, of a more sinister nature, one patient had a C2/3 dislocation requiring urgent stabilisation, one required a chest drain for a haemopneumothorax, and another required an emergency and life saving nephrectomy.Conclusion: This sport has recently experienced an explosion in popularity, and, as it carries a significant risk of potentially life threatening injury across all levels of participation, the use of protective equipment to reduce this significant morbidity may be advisable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Robotic-assisted knee replacement systems have been introduced to healthcare services worldwide in an effort to improve clinical outcomes for people, although high-quality evidence that they are clinically, or cost-effective remains sparse. Robotic-arm systems may improve surgical accuracy and could contribute to reduced pain, improved function and lower overall cost of total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. However, TKR with conventional instruments may be just as effective and may be quicker and cheaper. There is a need for a robust evaluation of this technology, including cost-effectiveness analyses using both within-trial and modelling approaches. This trial will compare robotic-assisted against conventional TKR to provide high-quality evidence on whether robotic-assisted knee replacement is beneficial to patients and cost-effective for healthcare systems., Methods and Analysis: The Robotic Arthroplasty Clinical and cost Effectiveness Randomised controlled trial-Knee is a multicentre, participant-assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted TKR compared with TKR using conventional instruments. A total of 332 participants will be randomised (1:1) to provide 90% power for a 12-point difference in the primary outcome measure; the Forgotten Joint Score at 12 months postrandomisation. Allocation concealment will be achieved using computer-based randomisation performed on the day of surgery and methods for blinding will include sham incisions for marker clusters and blinded operation notes. The primary analysis will adhere to the intention-to-treat principle. Results will be reported in line with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement. A parallel study will collect data on the learning effects associated with robotic-arm systems., Ethics and Dissemination: The trial has been approved by an ethics committee for patient participation (East Midlands-Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee, 29 July 2020. NRES number: 20/EM/0159). All results from the study will be disseminated using peer-reviewed publications, presentations at international conferences, lay summaries and social media as appropriate., Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN27624068., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Stryker is providing funding for consumables, preoperative CT costs and 10 min of theatre time, according to contractual arrangements. They also fund some postoperative CT costs in the learning effects study. Appropriate contracts are in place to ensure the independence of the trial team with regard to study design, data collection, management, analysis and interpretation in line with NIHR reporting standards. Multiple investigators are investigators on two other NIHR-funded studies receiving additional support for treatment costs from Stryker, START:REACTS (16/61/18) (AM, HP, CEH, JM and MU) and RACER-Hip (NIHR131407) (AM, ETD, HP, SR, CEH, DRE, JM, FSH, JAS and MU). The full independence of the investigators of these related studies are protected by legal agreements, similar to this study. FSH receives funding from Stryker to run clinical studies. Multiple authors report other unrelated research grants from NIHR during the conduct of the study. DRE, HP and JG are supported from NIHR Research Capability Funding via University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire. MU is chief investigator or coinvestigator on multiple previous and current research grants from the UK National Institute for Health Research, Arthritis Research UK and is a coinvestigator on grants funded by the Australian NHMRC and Norwegian MRC. He was an NIHR Senior Investigator until March 2021. He has received travel expenses for speaking at conferences from the professional organisations hosting the conferences. He is a director and shareholder of Clinvivo that provides electronic data collection for health services research. He is part of an academic partnership with Serco Ltd, funded by the European Social Fund, related to return to work initiatives. Until March 2020 he was an editor of the NIHR journal series, and a member of the NIHR Journal Editors Group, for which he received a fee., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

In this article we wish to provide MAKO robotic knee users a surgical guide including tips and tricks on performing MAKO robotic-assisted patellofemoral joint replacements. The senior authors in this paper from the Exeter Knee Reconstruction Unit, United Kingdom are highly experienced MAKO users who have been performing MAKO assisted Patellofemoral joint replacements since 2017., Competing Interests: Conflict of interestOn behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest., (© Indian Orthopaedics Association 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.)

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is an effective surgical treatment for isolated medial compartment knee osteoarthritis; however, widespread adoption is limited due to difficulty in achieving the planned correction, and patient dissatisfaction due to soft tissue irritation. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of a novel HTO system with 3D printed patient specific implants and surgical guides using cadaveric specimens. Local ethics committee approval was obtained. The novel opening wedge HTO procedure was performed on eight cadaver leg specimens. Whole lower limb CT scans pre- and post-operatively provided geometrical assessment quantifying the discrepancy between pre-planned and post-operative measurements for key variables: the gap opening angle and the patient specific surgical instrumentation positioning. The average discrepancy between the pre-operative plan and the post-operative osteotomy correction angle was: 0.0 ± 0.2° The R 2 value for the regression correlation was 0.95. The average error in implant positioning was -0.4 ± 4.3 mm, -2.6 ± 3.4 mm and 3.1 ± 1.7° vertically, horizontally, and rotationally respectively. This novel HTO surgery has greater accuracy in correction angle achieved compared to that reported for conventional or other patient specific methods with published data available. This system could potentially improve the accuracy of osteotomy correction angles achieved surgically., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All authors must disclose any financial and personal relationships with other people or organisations that could inappropriately influence (bias) their work. Examples of potential conflicts of interest include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. Conflicts of Interest: AR MacLeod: Named inventor on related patent; Financial interest: Shares in 3D Metal Printing ltd JA Mathews: None AD Toms: Named inventor on related patent; Named clinical lead on the project VI Mandalia: Involved with the development of the personalised surgical guides HS Gill: Named inventor on related patent; editorial board member: Bone and Joint Journal + Medical Engineering and Physics; society executive board: president of the British orthopaedic research society., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: GIRFT tasked regional networks with addressing case-load, complexity-spread and cost of revision knee replacement (KR), but the regional cost burden is not clear. The tariff for revision KR is currently not dependent on surgical complexity. 2 years of revision KR complexity data using the validated Revision Knee Complexity Classification (RKCC) checklist as a demonstration of complexity spread in the region has previously been published. The aims of this study were to estimate the annual regional cost of revision TKR using existing data, and estimate the cost/saving of complexity-clustering using existing data from 8 revision centres., Methods: Financial data from the regional high-volume centre for one year (2019) of RKCC data collection was obtained. Mean cost, tariff and balance was calculated for R1, R2 and R3 (RKCC), and applied to data from each revision centre to provide local estimates. Complexity clustering was considered using 3 hypothetical scenarios of high-volume centre absorbing R2s and/or R3s in place of R1s., Results: Mean net loss was £2,290.08 for R1s, £6,471.42 for R2s and £6,454.26 for R3s. The estimated total annual loss for the region was £1,005,025. Complexity-clustering was associated with greater losses; £162,918 for high-volume centre taking R2s and R3s, £37,477.60 for taking just R3s and £125,440 for taking just R2s., Conclusion: Revision TKR surgery is expensive and insufficiently remunerated with current measures. Restructuring of regional workload would create additional financial burden on specialist centres with current tariff awards structure. Managing reimbursement at a regional or central level may help to incentivise compliance with GIRFT ideals., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Crown Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Over 160 000 participants per year complete the 12-item Oxford Hip and Knee Scores (OHS/OKS) as part of the NHS England Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) programme. We used a modern computational approach, known as computerised adaptive testing (CAT), to simulate individually tailored OHS and OKS assessment, with the goal of reducing the number of questions a patient must complete without compromising measurement accuracy., Methods: We fit the 2018/2019 PROMs data to an item response theory (IRT) model. We assessed IRT model assumptions alongside reliability. We used parameters from the IRT model with data from 2017/2018 to simulate CAT assessments. Two simulations were run until a prespecified SE of measurement was met (SE=0.32 and SE=0.45). We compared the number of questions required to meet each cut-off and assessed the correlation between the full-length and CAT administration., Results: We conducted IRT analysis using 40 432 OHS and 44 714 OKS observations. The OHS and OKS were both unidimensional (root mean square error of approximation 0.08 and 0.07, respectively) and marginal reliability 0.91 and 0.90. The CAT, with a precision limit of SE=0.32 and SE=0.45, required a median of four items (IQR 1) and two items (IQR 1), respectively, for the OHS, and median of four items (IQR 2) and two items (IQR 0) for the OKS. This represents a potential 82% reduction in PROM length. In the context of 160 000 yearly assessments, these methodologies could result in the omission of some 1 280 000 redundant questions per year, which equates to 40 000 hours of patient time., Conclusion: The application of IRT to the OHS and OKS produces an efficient and substantially reduced CAT. We have demonstrated a path to reduce the burden and potentially increase the compliance for these ubiquitous outcome measures without compromising measurement accuracy., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

The demand for revision knee replacement (RKR) has increased dramatically with rising patient life expectancy and younger recipients for primary TKR. However, significant challenges to RKR arise from osseous defects, reduced bone quality, potential bone volume loss from implant removal and the need to achieve implant stability. This study utilizes the outcomes of an ongoing RKR clinical trial using porous metaphyseal cones 3D-printed of titanium, to investigate 1) bone mineral density (BMD) changes in three fixation zones (epiphysis, metaphysis, and diaphysis) over a year and 2) the biomechanical effects of the cones at 6 months post-surgery. It combines dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), computed tomography (CT) with patient-specific based finite element (FE) modelling. Bone loss (-0.086 ± 0.05 g/cm 2 ) was found in most patients over the first year. The biomechanical assessment considered four different loading scenarios from standing, walking on a flat surface, and walking downstairs, to a simulated impact of the knee. The patient-specific FE models showed that the cones marginally improved the strain distribution in the bone and shared the induced load but played a limited role in reducing the risks of bone fracture or cement debonding. This technique of obtaining real live data from a randomized clinical trial and inserting it into an in-silico FE model is unique and innovative in RKR research. The tibia RKR biomechanics examined open up further possibilities, allowing the in-silico testing of prototypes and implant combinations without putting patients at risk as per the recommended IDEAL framework standards. This process with further improvements could allow rapid innovation, optimization of implant design, and improve surgical planning., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Patello-femoral arthroplasty (PFA) is successful in a selected group of patients and yields a good functional outcome. Robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty has been shown to provide better implant positioning and alignment. We aim to report our early outcomes and to compare Mako's (Robotic Arm Interactive Orthopaedic System [RIO]) preoperative implant planning position to our intraoperative PFA implant position. Data for this study was prospectively collected for 23 (two bilateral) patients who underwent robotic-assisted PFA between April 2017 and May 2018. All preoperative implant position planning and postoperative actual implant position were recorded. Presence of trochlear dysplasia and functional outcome scores were also collected. There were 17 (two bilateral) female and 6 male patients with a mean age of 66.5 (range: 41-89) years. The mean follow-up period was 30 (range: 24-37) months. Eighteen knees (72%) had evidence of trochlear dysplasia. The anterior trochlear line was on average, 7.71 (range: 3.3-11.3) degrees, internally rotated to the surgical transepicondylar axis and on average 2.9 (range: 0.2-6.5) degrees internally rotated to the posterior condylar line. The preoperative planning range was 4-degree internal to 4-degree external rotation, 4-degree varus to 6-degree valgus, and 7-degree flexion to 3-degree extension. The average difference between preoperative planning and intraoperative implant position was 0.43 degrees for rotation ( r  = 0.93), 0.99 degrees for varus/valgus ( r  = 0.29), 1.26 degrees for flexion/extension ( r  = 0.83), and 0.34 mm for proudness ( r  = 0.80). Six patients (24%) had a different size component from their preoperative plan ( r  = 0.98). The mean preoperative Oxford Knee Score (OKS) was 16 and the mean postoperative OKS was 42. No patient had implant-related revision surgery or any radiological evidence of implant loosening at final follow-up. Our early results of robotic PFA are promising. Preoperative Mako planning correlates closely with intraoperative implant positioning. Longer follow-up is needed to assess long-term patient outcomes and implant survivorship., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Revision knee replacement is an increasingly common procedure, however, information on patient-focused outcomes is limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the medium-term patient reported outcomes following a revision knee replacement., Methods: We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE and EMBASE (from inception to 1st March 2021) for articles reporting five year or greater patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) following revision knee replacement. A meta-analysis of PROMs data was undertaken using the Standardised Mean Difference (SMD). Quality of methodology was assessed using Wylde's non-summative four-point system. The study was registered with PROPSERO (CRD42021199289)., Results: A total of 23 studies met the inclusion criteria containing 2414 patients at a mean minimum follow-up of 74 months (60-122). The reporting of PROMs were poorly standardised with several PROMs being used. The most commonly reported patient reported outcome was the Knee Society Score reported in 65% of studies (15/23). A meta-analysis of 629 eligible patients undergoing revision knee replacement revealed a significant improvement in pre-operative state with a SMD 2·05 95% CI 0.87, 3.23., Conclusion: This systematic review has found a significant and sustained improvement in patient-reported outcomes following a revision knee arthroplasty beyond five years. We found a variation in the usage and administration of PROMs which hinders a clear synthesis of results. Furthermore, the PROMs have not been robustly tested for validity in the context of a revision knee replacement., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) causes significant morbidity and mortality following knee replacement surgery. Identifying causative organisms and antibiotic sensitivities is critical in increasing the chance of infection eradication. This study investigated whether biopsy alone was superior to aspiration alone for serological diagnosis in PJI following knee replacement. Secondly, we investigated whether biopsy identifies the same or new/different microbiological flora as aspiration., Methods: Since December 2014, the Exeter Knee Reconstruction Unit (EKRU) has prospectively collated data regarding all PJIs referred from our local/regional network which have been reviewed via our Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT). We identified and included consecutive patients from this MDT from Dec.2014-Mar.2020 and analysed their electronic records. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata., Results: 65/100 patients studied had both pre-operative aspiration and biopsy. 31/65 (48%) had positive aspiration and biopsies. No aspirate samples were positive with corresponding biopsies negative. In 19/65 (29%) of infection positive patients, biopsy identified new (7) or additional (12) organisms not identified by aspiration. Aspiration had a sensitivity of 70%, specificity of 88%, positive predictive value of 90.3% and negative predictive value of 64.7%. Biopsy had a sensitivity of 97.5%, specificity of 88%, positive predictive value of 92.9% and negative predictive value of 95.7%., Conclusion: In 29% of confirmed PJI cases, arthroscopic biopsy identified either additional organisms in a polymicrobial PJI when compared to aspiration, or new positive results when aspiration alone was negative. This study demonstrates the benefits of arthroscopic biopsy for serological diagnosis in cases of knee PJI and aids treatment planning., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The GIRFT report (2012) sought to address the need for sustainable orthopaedic treatment delivered through regional "networks"; the aim being improved care, decreased cost and reduced revision rate. The aims of this study were to record the number and complexity of revision total knee replacements within a regional network using a validated classification over a two-year period and audit this against National Joint Registry (NJR) records., Methods: A region-wide network model where revision TKR cases are assessed locally using the Revision Knee Complexity Classification (RKCC) and local multi-disciplinary team (MDT) was introduced. Data was collected from 8 revision centres over a two-year period using the RKCC. The case volume was audited against the NJR records., Results: In year 1 (01/01/2018-31/12/2018) 237 RKCC forms were collected from eight centres. 46% of R2s and 63% of R3s were carried out at the higher volume centre. 211 K2 forms were received by the NJR. In year 2 (01/01/2019-31/12/2019) 252 RKCC forms were collected. 46% of R2s and 64% of R3s were carried out at the higher volume centre. 267 K2 forms were received by the NJR., Conclusion: This is the first published set of revision knee data showing complexity percentages across a region. The RKCC has been successfully introduced into the region and this has been sustained. The findings show that a successful network has been established and majority of complex revision knee surgery is occurring in the high-volume centre. NJR data suggests that the RKCC is capturing the complexity and volume of our work accurately., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite favourable outcomes relatively few surgeons offer high tibial osteotomy (HTO) as a treatment option for early knee osteoarthritis, mainly due to the difficulty of achieving planned correction and reported soft tissue irritation around the plate used to stablise the osteotomy. To compare the mechanical safety of a new personalised 3D printed high tibial osteotomy (HTO) device, created to overcome these issues, with an existing generic device, a case-control in silico virtual clinical trial was conducted., Methods: Twenty-eight knee osteoarthritis patients underwent computed tomography (CT) scanning to create a virtual cohort; the cohort was duplicated to form two arms, Generic and Personalised, on which virtual HTO was performed. Finite element analysis was performed to calculate the stresses in the plates arising from simulated physiological activities at three healing stages. The odds ratio indicative of the relative risk of fatigue failure of the HTO plates between the personalised and generic arms was obtained from a multi-level logistic model., Results: Here we show, at 12 weeks post-surgery, the odds ratio indicative of the relative risk of fatigue failure was 0.14 (95%CI 0.01 to 2.73, p = 0.20)., Conclusions: This novel (to the best of our knowledge) in silico trial, comparing the mechanical safety of a new personalised 3D printed high tibial osteotomy device with an existing generic device, shows that there is no increased risk of failure for the new personalised design compared to the existing generic commonly used device. Personalised high tibial osteotomy can overcome the main technical barriers for this type of surgery, our findings support the case for using this technology for treating early knee osteoarthritis., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Revision knee replacement (KR) is both challenging for the surgical team and expensive for the healthcare provider. Limited high quality evidence is available to guide decision-making., Aim: To provide guidelines for surgeons and units delivering revision KR services., Methods: A formal consensus process was followed by BASK's Revision Knee Working Group, which included surgeons from England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. This was supported by analysis of National Joint Registry data., Results: There are a large number of surgeons operating at NHS sites who undertake a small number of revision KR procedures. To optimise patient outcomes and deliver cost-effective care high-volume revision knee surgeons working at high volume centres should undertake revision KR. This document outlines practice guidelines for units providing a revision KR service and sets out: The current landscape of revision KR in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Service organisation within a network model. The necessary infrastructure required to provide a sustainable revision service. Outcome metrics and auditable standards. Financial mechanisms to support this service model., Conclusions: Revision KR patients being treated in the NHS should be provided with the best care available. This report sets out a framework to both guide and support revision KR surgeons and centres to achieve this aim., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Crown Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Elective orthopaedic surgery during the Covid-19 pandemic requires careful case prioritisation. We aimed to produce consensus-based guidelines on the prioritisation of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures., Method: Twenty-three revision TKA scenarios were assigned priority (NHS England/Royal College of Surgeons scale) by the British Association for Surgery of the Knee (BASK) Revision Knee Working Group (n = 24). Consensus agreement was defined as ≥70% respondents (18/24) giving the same prioritisation. Two voting rounds were undertaken; procedures achieving <70% agreement were given their most commonly assigned priority., Results: 18/23 procedures achieved ≥70% agreement. Three were P1a (surgery within <24 h); DAIR for sepsis, peri-prosthetic fracture (PPF) fixation and PPF-revision TKA. Three were P1b (<72 h); debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) for a stable patient, flap coverage for an open knee, and acute extensor mechanism rupture. Eight were P2 (<4 weeks), including aseptic loosening at risk of collapse, inter-stage patients with poor functioning spacers. Five were P3 (<3 months), including second stage revision for infection, revision for instability with limited mobility. Four were P4 (can wait >3 months) e.g. aseptic loosening., Conclusion: Sepsis and PPF surgery are the most urgent procedures. Although most procedures should be undertaken within one to three months (P2/3), these cases represent a small revision practice volume; P4 cases (e.g. aseptic loosening without risk of collapse) make up most surgeons' caseload. These recommendations are a guideline; patient co-morbidities, Covid-19 pathways, availability of support services and multi-disciplinary team discussion within the regional revision network will dictate prioritisation., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Crown Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and objective Orthopaedic services have reorganised their delivery of care in response to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. In this study, we aimed to share our operating experience during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and analyse its effect on urgent hip and knee arthroplasty. Our study involved a comparative analysis between a cohort of patients from 2019 (pre-COVID) and another from 2020. Methods Tha data relating to patients undergoing urgent operations requiring arthroplasty interventions such as for infection, periprosthetic fracture (PPF) and neck of femur fracture (NOF) between April and July of 2020 and 2019 were reviewed prospectively and retrospectively. Patients were categorised according to the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) case prioritisation and the COVID-19 risk assessment. Data were collected on 30-day mortality, readmissions, reoperations, complications, length of hospital stay and theatre efficiency. This was analysed, matched and compared. Statistical analysis was performed on categorical variables including the time to the theatre as well as dual consultant operating. Results A total of 46 consecutive patients were included in the 2020 cohort with a mean age of 78 years (range: 58-108 years). The median length of stay was 6.5 days (range: 3-35 days) and the median time to theatre for NOF patients was 23.8 hours (range: 16.2-87.7 hours). There were six complications and two deaths; one of the deaths was COVID-19-related. A total of 56 patients were included from 2019 with a mean age of 74.6 years (range: 45-88 years). The median length of stay was five days (range: 1-18 days) and the median time to theatre for NOF patients was 40.8 hours (range: 18.9-167 hours). There were four complications and one death. Conclusion Based on our findings, it is safe to perform complex surgery in a region of low community prevalence of COVID-19, and the outcomes were comparable to those from a pre-COVID-19 cohort., Competing Interests: The authors have declared financial relationships, which are detailed in the next section., (Copyright © 2020, Burton et al.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors Jonathan Phillips and Andrew Toms declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the manuscript that has been submitted.

Background: The burden of knee replacement prosthetic joint infection (KR PJI) is increasing. KR PJI is difficult to treat, outcomes can be poor and it is financially expensive and limited evidence is available to guide treatment decisions., Aim: To provide guidelines for surgeons and units treating KR PJI., Methods: Guideline formation by consensus process undertaken by BASK's Revision Knee Working Group, supported by outputs from UK-PJI meetings., Results: Improved outcomes should be achieved through provision of care by revision centres in a network model. Treatment of KR PJI should only be undertaken at specialist units with the required infrastructure and a regular infection MDT. This document outlines practice guidelines for units providing a KR PJI service and sets out: CONCLUSIONS: KR PJI patients treated within the NHS should be provided the best care possible. This report sets out guidance and support for surgeons and units to achieve this., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Beyond Compliance (BC) was introduced in 2012 to improve the monitoring and regulation of new medical devices and techniques, ensuring patient safety whilst promoting innovation through an evidence based appraisal of devices during their introduction. This study reports the 2 year outcomes of the first Total Knee Replacement (TKR) implant to be assessed through the BC process., Methods: 100 consecutive patients undergoing primary knee arthroplasty were enrolled. All patients received a single radius cruciate retaining TKA (Unity, Corin), and the patella was resurfaced in all cases. Patients were followed up at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post operatively. Pre-and post-operative range of movement (ROM) as well as outcome scores including OKS, KOOS, EQ5D index and EQ5D VAS were recorded., Results: 100 patients with a mean age 73.6 (SD = 8.7) were included. 2 patients died during the follow-up period due to unrelated reasons. Overall satisfaction rates were 96%. Complications included ongoing pain (5 patients), and a periprosthetic fracture (1 patient) nine months post-surgery (traumatic). No knees were revised during the follow-up period. Significant improvements were observed in all outcomes measures (OKS, KOOS, EQ5D, and EQ5D VAS). The mean added ROM was 13.2°., Discussion: This knee prosthesis has been demonstrated to be safe and effective with excellent early outcomes. The careful regulated introduction of this device through BC has ensured patients safety while supporting innovation in knee arthroplasty. The success of BC requires surgeons to insist industry fully engage with the process for all new devices or techniques., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2020 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Revision knee replacement (KR) is technically challenging, expensive, and outcomes can be poor. It is well established that increasing surgeon and unit volumes results in improved outcomes and cost-effectiveness for complex procedures. The aim of this study was to 1) describe the current provision of revision KR in England, Wales and Northern Ireland at the individual surgeon and unit level and 2) investigate the effect on workload of case distribution in a network model., Methods: Current practice was mapped using NJR summary statistics containing all revision KR procedures performed over a three-year period (2016-2018). Units were identified as revision centres based on threshold volumes. Units undertaking <20 revisions per year were classified as Primary Arthroplasty Units (PAUs) in calculations on the effect of workload centralisation., Results: Revision KR was performed by 1353 surgeons at 232 NHS sites. The majority of surgeons and units were low-volume; >1000 surgeons performed <7 and 125 sites performed <20 procedures per year. Reallocation of work from these 125 PAUs (1235 cases, 21% of total workload) to a network model with even redistribution of cases between centres undertaking revision surgery would result in an additional average annual case increase of 11 per unit per year (range six to 14)., Conclusions: Revision KR workload re-allocation would lift all revision centres above a 30 per year threshold and would appear to be a manageable increase in workload for specialist revision KR centres. Case complexity and local referral agreements will significantly affect the real increase in workload; these factors were not incorporated here., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background Total knee replacement is often associated with significant postoperative pain. Although the use of a femoral nerve block is well-established, local infiltration analgesia has gained popularity in recent years. We compared single-shot local infiltration analgesia with a single-shot femoral nerve block for patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty. Methods A total of 194 patients were randomised to receive either local infiltration analgesia (150 ml bupivacaine 0.067% with adrenaline) or a femoral nerve block (20 ml 0.375% levobupivacaine). Both groups received spinal anaesthesia. The primary outcome measure was the total morphine consumption. Secondary outcome measures included: post-operative pain scores, rehabilitation goals, readiness for discharge, and physical, mental, and functional outcomes, including the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Results A total of 69 patients in the local infiltration analgesia group and 79 patients in the femoral nerve block group were analysed. Median total morphine consumption was significantly greater in the local infiltration analgesia group as compared to the femoral nerve block group (54.67 mg vs 45 mg, respectively, p=0.0388). The post-operative OKS at six weeks was slightly more improved for the femoral nerve block group than for local infiltration analgesia (12.5 vs 9 point median improvements for the femoral nerve block and local infiltration analgesia groups, respectively, p=0.0261). There were no statistically significant differences in other secondary outcome measures. Conclusion A single-shot femoral nerve block significantly reduces the opioid requirement for primary total knee arthroplasty but is otherwise comparable to single-shot local infiltration analgesia., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2020, Ng et al.)

Aims: The James Lind Alliance aims to bring patients, carers, and clinicians together to identify uncertainties regarding care. A Priority Setting Partnership was established by the British Association for Surgery of the Knee in conjunction with the James Lind Alliance to identify research priorities related to the assessment, management, and rehabilitation of patients with persistent symptoms after knee arthroplasty., Methods: The project was conducted using the James Lind Alliance protocol. A steering group was convened including patients, surgeons, anaesthetists, nurses, physiotherapists, and researchers. Partner organizations were recruited. A survey was conducted on a national scale through which patients, carers, and healthcare professionals submitted key unanswered questions relating to problematic knee arthroplasties. These were analyzed, aggregated, and synthesized into summary questions and the relevant evidence was checked. After confirming that these were not answered in the current literature, 32 questions were taken forward to an interim prioritization survey. Data from this survey informed a shortlist taken to a final consensus meeting., Results: A total of 769 questions were received during the initial survey with national reach across the UK. These were refined into 32 unique questions by an independent information specialist. The interim prioritization survey was completed by 201 respondents and 25 questions were taken to a final consensus group meeting between patients, carers, and healthcare professionals. Consensus was reached for ranking the top ten questions for publication and dissemination., Conclusions: The top ten research priorities focused on pain, infection, stiffness, health service configuration, surgical and non-surgical management strategies, and outcome measures. This list will guide funders and help focus research efforts within the knee arthroplasty community. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(9):1176-1182.

Background: The diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is challenging because no single test has consistently demonstrated an adequate discriminative potential. The combination of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) with adequate thresholds is well established. This study sought to investigate the role of plasma viscosity (PV) in the diagnosis of PJI following painful total knee arthroplasty., Methods: The medical notes, and hematological and microbiology results of 310 patients who underwent revision for a painful total knee arthroplasty were evaluated. Infection was confirmed using Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria in 102 patients (32.9%), whereas 208 patients (67.1%) were classified as noninfected. Serum investigations including ESR, CRP, and PV were analyzed using receiver observer curves and optimal cutoff points identified., Results: There was a strong correlation between PV and both ESR and CRP. The area under curve was 0.814 for PV and 0.812 for ESR. Statistical analysis showed noninferiority of PV as compared to ESR in diagnosing PJI. A PV value of ≥ 1.81 mPa.s. had the best efficiency of 82.1%. Combining a CRP ≥ 13.5 mg/L with a PV ≥ 1.81 mPa.s. in a serial test approach yielded the highest specificity of 97.9% and positive likelihood ratio of 22.8. Sensitivity was 47.9% and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.53., Conclusion: PV is noninferior to ESR in diagnosing PJI. Its use is justified in clinical practice. It is cheaper, quicker, more efficient, and not influenced by hematocrit levels or medication. In this cohort, a PV value ≥ 1.81 mPa.s. would be an adequate cutoff to diagnose PJI in combination with CRP ≥ 13.5 mg/L., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: To report the long-term results for a single-surgeon consecutive series of Scorpio non-restrictive geometry (NRG) posterior stabilised (PS) total knee replacement (TKR)., Materials and Methods: Forty-six consecutive patients who underwent 53 Scorpio NRG PS were identified. Change in range of motion (ROM) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) over time were recorded. Radiographs were evaluated for alignment and radiolucent lines. Survival analysis for the prosthesis was calculated., Results: At a mean of 10.1 years (range 9.1-10.9) following exclusions thirty-seven (69.8%) knees in thirty-one (67.4%) patients (6 bilateral) were available for review. None of the patients required revision surgery. Mean OKS score at 10 years was 37.8. The mean ROM significantly improved from 95° pre-operative to 117.5° at 5 years and 115° at 10 years (p = < 0.001). This equates to a value-added range of motion (VAROM) of 19° at 5 years and 15.6° at 10 years. There was a correlation between OKS and VAROM at 5 and 10 years. Radiological assessment did not reveal any evidence of progressive cement radiolucent lines nor component migration., Conclusion: In this series the Scorpio NRG PS showed 100% 10-year survivorship. We found a significant improvement in ROM and VAROM over time. This was not associated with increased signs of loosening.

Background: A Knee Infection Multi-Disciplinary Team meeting was established in Exeter. This study was designed to qualitatively evaluate the impact of the MDT on those involved., Materials and Methods: Semi-structured interviews of all members of the MDT at Exeter were undertaken and analysed using Nvivo software. Data was coded to identify common patterns and trends., Results: The common themes identified were improved communication and standardisation of care. The main challenges identified were the timing of the meetings and funding., Conclusion: This study has used established qualitative techniques to evaluate the impact of the Exeter Knee Infection MDT., (© 2019 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Our aim was to question the usefulness of a three-phase bone scan in the evaluation of pain in the knee region after TKR. Our hypothesis was that an abnormal investigation had a poor association with the presence of infection or loosening, and did not provide any additional diagnostic information above that already available through other standard investigations., Methods: A retrospective study over a 24-month period was performed comprising 118 patients investigated with a TPBS. Investigations were summarised and analysed, and were classified as entirely normal, possibly abnormal, and definitely abnormal., Results: Thirty-three per cent (39/118) of TPBSs were reported as being entirely normal, 59% (69/118) as possibly abnormal, and 8% (10/118) as definitely abnormal. During the 24-month study period, 131 revision TKR procedures were performed at our institution; 9% (12/131) were investigated with TPBS and 91% (119/131) were not. No patient with an entirely normal pre-operative TPBS underwent revision TKR surgery. Eighty-five per cent (67/79) with an abnormal TPBS were managed conservatively. In our series, a TPBS had a positive predictive value of 2.53%, a negative predictive value of 100%, with an overall accuracy of 34.75% with 100% sensitivity (97.5% one-sided confidence interval 0-24.71%), and 33.62% specificity (95% confidence interval 53.29-72.37%), in the diagnosis of infection, or loosening with concurrent infection in determining the indication for revision surgery., Conclusion: A TPBS should only be considered following clinical evaluation, serological investigation, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological analysis of fluid obtained from arthrocentesis by a specialist revision arthroplasty surgeon. A TPBS may be useful in the situation where abnormal serology is present, but where repeated joint aspirations samples are inconclusive.

Purpose: There is considerable variation in practice throughout Europe in both the services provided and in the outcomes of Revision Knee Surgery. In the UK, a recent report published called get it right first time (GIRFT) aims to improve patient outcomes through providing high quality, cost-effective care, and reducing complications. This has led to the development of a classification system that attempts to classify the complexity of revision knee surgery, aiming to encourage and support regional clinical networking., Methods: The revision knee classification system (RKCC) incorporates not only complexity, but also patient factors, the presence of infection, the integrity of the extensor mechanism, and the soft tissues. It then provides guidance for clinical network discussion. Reliability and reproducibility testing have been performed to establish the inter- and intra-observer variabilities using this classification., Results: Good correlation between first attempt non-expert and experts, good intra-observer variability of non-expert, and an excellent correlation between second attempt non-expert and experts has been achieved. This supports the use of RKCC by both inexperienced and experienced surgeons., Conclusions: The revision knee complexity classification has been proposed that offers a common-sense approach to recognize the increasing complexity in revision TKR cases. It provides a methodological assessment of revision knee cases and support regional clinical networking and triage of appropriate cases to revision units or specialist centres., Level of Evidence: Expert opinion, Level V.

Objectives: Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is an established surgical procedure for the treatment of early-stage knee arthritis. Other than infection, the majority of complications are related to mechanical factors - in particular, stimulation of healing at the osteotomy site. This study used finite element (FE) analysis to investigate the effect of plate design and bridging span on interfragmentary movement (IFM) and the influence of fracture healing on plate stress and potential failure., Materials and Methods: A 10° opening wedge HTO was created in a composite tibia. Imaging and strain gauge data were used to create and validate FE models. Models of an intact tibia and a tibia implanted with a custom HTO plate using two different bridging spans were validated against experimental data. Physiological muscle forces and different stages of osteotomy gap healing simulating up to six weeks postoperatively were then incorporated. Predictions of plate stress and IFM for the custom plate were compared against predictions for an industry standard plate (TomoFix)., Results: For both plate types, long spans increased IFM but did not substantially alter peak plate stress. The custom plate increased axial and shear IFM values by up to 24% and 47%, respectively, compared with the TomoFix. In all cases, a callus stiffness of 528 MPa was required to reduce plate stress below the fatigue strength of titanium alloy., Conclusion: We demonstrate that larger bridging spans in opening wedge HTO increase IFM without substantially increasing plate stress. The results indicate, however, that callus healing is required to prevent fatigue failure. Cite this article : A. R. MacLeod, G. Serrancoli, B. J. Fregly, A. D. Toms, H. S. Gill. The effect of plate design, bridging span, and fracture healing on the performance of high tibial osteotomy plates: An experimental and finite element study. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:639-649. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.712.BJR-2018-0035.R1., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Statement: None declared

Previous studies suggest that complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) occurs in up to 21% of patients following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, this diagnosis has a substantial impact on the patient's management if it is incorrect. We aimed to identify cases, using updated internationally accepted criteria, while investigating potential causes of misdiagnosis.We prospectively studied a consecutive series of 100 primary TKA patients. Each patient was assessed 6-week post-TKA. Pain levels were recorded with the presence of symptoms and signs of CRPS (Budapest Diagnostic Criteria) assessed in those with excessive pain. An alternative diagnosis was sought, in these patients, including the presence of neuropathic pain.We found no cases of CRPS (no patients had symptoms or signs in greater than two of four subgroups). Seventeen patients had excessive pain levels (nine had an alternative diagnosis explaining this). The commonest signs were sensory and sudomotor, whereas motor/trophic changes were not seen. Using a previous definition (Orlando Criteria), eight patients may have been diagnosed with CRPS. Over half of the patients with unexplained excessive pain had evidence of neuropathic pain.CRPS is a rare diagnosis following TKA using modern criteria. Isolated signs and symptoms may lead to the overdiagnosis of CRPS in the presence of unexplained pain following TKA. New diagnostic criteria, with strict definitions and treatment algorithms, are now accepted. Delays in managing more common causes (such as neuropathic pain) may negatively affect the patient's outcome., Competing Interests: None., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

Introduction: Kinematic alignment (KA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) matches component position to the pre-arthritic anatomy of an individual patient, with the aim of improving functional outcomes. Recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing KA to traditional neutral mechanical alignment (MA) have been mixed. This collaborative study combined raw data from RCTs, aiming to compare functional outcomes between KA using patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and MA, and whether any patient subgroups may benefit more from KA technique., Materials and Methods: A literature search in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases identified four randomised controlled trials comparing patients undergoing TKA using PSI-KA and MA. Unpublished data including Western Ontario McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and Knee Society Score (KSS) were obtained from study authors. Meta-analysis compared MA to KA change (post-op minus pre-op) scores. Subgroup-analysis on KA patients looked for subgroups more likely to benefit from KA and the impact of PSI accuracy., Results: Meta-analyses of change scores in 229 KA patients versus 229 MA patients were no different from WOMAC (mean difference 3.4; 95% confidence interval - 0.5 to 7.3), KSS function (1.3, - 3.9 to 6.4) or KSS combined (7.2, - 0.8 to 15.2). A small advantage was seen for KSS pain in the KA group (3.6, 95% CI 0.2-7.1). Subgroup-analysis showed no difference between varus, valgus and neutral pre-operative alignment groups, and those who did and did not achieve KA plans. Pain-free patients at 1-year were more likely to achieve KA plans., Conclusion: Patient-reported outcome scores following TKA using PSI-KA are similar to MA. No identifiable subgroups benefited more from KA, and long-term results remain unknown. Inaccuracy of the PSI system used in KA patients could potentially affect outcome.

Background: The surgical management of isolated medial compartment degenerative disease of the knee causes debate. Unicompartmental arthroplasty options include fixed and mobile bearing implant designs with fixed bearing becoming increasingly popular. We present the largest cohort of a fixed bearing single radius design, Stryker Triathlon Partial Knee Replacement (PKR)., Methods: We prospectively collected demographic data and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) on our cohort of PKR implants since its adoption in our unit, 2009 until March 2015., Results: A total of 129 implants in 115 patients with a mean follow-up of 5.5 years (2.5 to 8.5 years) were included. There were 11 revisions at an average of 1.7 years (0.6-4.1 years), two for infection, two for mal-alignment, five for progression of disease and two for loosening. The survivorship of the implants at five years is 90%., Conclusion: The PKR provides good survivorship at five years and PROM scores that are equal to the largest and most popular comparable implants. There is an associated learning curve with this implant, as there is with all systems and this is reflected in our results., (Crown Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Catastrophic failure of stemmed components in arthroplasty is an uncommon but a serious complication. Stem fractures and techniques for addressing these have been described following hip arthroplasty but much less so following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We review three cases of catastrophic failure of the stem in rotating hinge revision TKA prostheses. We discuss the possible mechanism of failure and review the current literature addressing this topic. Metaphyseal support needs to be optimized in order to minimize load transfer to the stem and to the junction (and the risk of fracture) if a modular component is used. When constrained components are used, radiographs need to be carefully assessed for signs of proximal loosening. Nonmodular stems are also an option in this situation., Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTEREST: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to assess the benefit of a Technetium-99M (HDP) 3-phase bone scan (TPBS) as an additional diagnostic test in the evaluation of pain in the hip region following cemented total hip replacement (THR) surgery., Methods: A retrospective study over a 24-month period was performed comprising 100 patients investigated with a TPBS. Investigations were summarised and analysed, and were classified as entirely normal, possibly abnormal, and definitely abnormal., Results: 45% (45) of TPBSs were reported as being entirely normal, 50% (50) as possibly abnormal, and 5% (5) as definitely abnormal. During the 24-month study period 230 revision THR procedures were performed at our institution; 10% (24) were investigated with TPBS and 90% (206) were not. 29% (7/24) of patients investigated with a TPBS that subsequently underwent revision THR surgery had an entirely normal preoperative TPBS. 84% (38) with an abnormal TPBS were managed conservatively. A TPBS had a sensitivity of 29% (95% confidence interval (CI), 13%-51%) and a specificity of 50% (95% CI, 38%-62%) in the detection of infection, or loosening with concurrent infection., Conclusion: A TPBS should only be considered following clinical evaluation, serological investigation, diagnostic imaging and microbiological analysis of fluid obtained from arthrocentesis by a specialist revision arthroplasty surgeon. A TPBS may be useful in the situation where abnormal serology is present, but where repeated joint aspirations samples are inconclusive.

Aim: To determine whether a mechanical, high-frequency vibration device (Tenease ™ ) can improve pain and function for the treatment of tennis elbow (TE), compared with standard treatment., Methods: Adults presenting to an elbow clinic with a clinical diagnosis of TE were randomized to standard treatment with physiotherapy, activity modification and analgesia or standard treatment plus Tenease therapy. Tenease therapy consisted of a 6-week period of treatment using the Tenease device with three 10-min episodes each day. The primary outcome measure was the quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score at 6 months, with scores also taken at 6 weeks. Secondary outcome measures were the Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation Score and EuroQol 5-Dimension Visual Analogue Scale at the same time points., Results: Fifty-four patients were recruited into the study. Following randomization and initial dropout, 18 patients were included in the standard group and 27 in the Tenease group. Both groups reported improvements in primary outcome measure scores. The control group had a mean score of 44.3 (standard deviation (SD) = 18.8) at baseline, which dropped to 31.2 (SD = 17.2) at 6 months ( p = 0.002). The Tenease group had a mean score of 43.2 (SD = 22.7) at baseline, which dropped to 23.4 (SD = 15.0) at 6 months ( p = 0.064). Similar improvements were seen in secondary outcome measures with none reaching statistical significance. There were no statistically significant differences seen between the primary outcome scores at 6 weeks ( p = 0.9) or 6 months ( p = 0.5). No complications were noted in either group., Conclusions: Vibration therapy did not result in any statistically significant improvement in functional outcome scores compared to standard treatment for TE. It is important to note that this was a relatively small cohort and a high dropout rate was observed.

Introduction: Disuse osteopenia is a known consequence of reduced weight-bearing and has been demonstrated at the hip following leg injury but has not been specifically studied in postmenopausal women., Method: Bilateral DXA (GE Lunar Prodigy) bone mineral density (BMD) measurements were taken at the neck of femur (NOF), total hip region (TH) and lumbar spine in postmenopausal female groups comprising controls (N = 43), new leg fractures (#<3wks) (N = 9), and participants who had sustained a leg fracture more than one year previously (#>1yr) (N = 24). #>1yr were assessed at a single visit and the remaining groups at intervals over twelve months. Weight-bearing, function, 3-day pedometer readings, and pain levels were also recorded., Results: The #<3wks demonstrated significant (p < 0.05) losses in ipsilateral TH BMD at 6 weeks from baseline 0.927 ± 0.137 g/cm 2 , to 0.916 ± 0.151 g/cm 2 improving to 0.946 ± 0.135 g/cm 2 (n.s) at 12 months following gradual return to normal function and weight-bearing activity. The #>1yr scored significantly below controls in almost all key physical and functional outcomes demonstrating a long-term deficit in hip bone density on the ipsilateral side., Conclusion: The clinical significance of post-fracture reduction in hip BMD is a potential increased risk of hip fracture for a variable period that may be mitigated after return to normal function and weight-bearing. Improvement at 12 months in #<3wks is not consistent with #>1yr results indicating that long-term impairment in function and bone health may persist for some leg fracture patients. Unilateral bone loss could have implications for Fracture Liaison Services when assessing the requirement for medication post fracture., (Copyright © 2017 The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: We present the largest series of Avon patellofemoral joint (PFJ) replacements outside of the design centre. There is discussion over its efficacy and usefulness. We report an independent opinion of its indications, survivorship and outcomes., Methods: We prospectively collected demographic data and patient reported outcome measures (PROM's) on our cohort of Avon Patellofemoral replacements since its adoption in our unit in 2003 until 2014. We performed a retrospective review of radiographs., Results: We performed 103 PFJ replacements in 85 patients, 36 were male (mean age 61 - range 34 to 78) and 67 female (mean age 60 - range 38 to 82), mean follow up time was 5.6years (range 2.9 to 14.2years) with 93 implants still in situ. Their mean post-operative Oxford Knee Score was 36 (range seven to 48). There were nine conversions to TKR for disease progression and one revision of a femoral component for trochlear malpositioning. Mean time to revision was 2.9years (1.0 to 6.0years). Radiographic evidence of progression on Kellgren and Lawrence score in the un-replaced compartments was demonstrated in 23% of cases with imaging available. The Avon PFJ replacement delivers reproducible and effective pain relief and function to patients with isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. We believe PFJ replacement has an important role to play, and we will continue to perform this procedure for a carefully selected group of patients. Conversion to TKR does not and should not be regarded as failure of the index operation., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Approximately 20% of patients experience chronic pain after total knee replacement. There is little evidence for effective interventions for the management of this pain, and current healthcare provision is patchy and inconsistent. Given the complexity of this condition, multimodal and individualised interventions matched to pain characteristics are needed. We have undertaken a comprehensive programme of work to develop a care pathway for patients with chronic pain after total knee replacement. This protocol describes the design of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention care pathway compared with usual care., Methods: This is a pragmatic two-armed, open, multi-centred randomised controlled trial conducted within secondary care in the UK. Patients will be screened at 2 months after total knee replacement and 381 patients with chronic pain at 3 months postoperatively will be recruited. Recruitment processes will be optimised through qualitative research during a 6-month internal pilot phase. Patients are randomised using a 2:1 intervention:control allocation ratio. All participants receive usual care as provided by their hospital. The intervention comprises an assessment clinic appointment at 3 months postoperatively with an Extended Scope Practitioner and up to six telephone follow-up calls over 12 months. In the assessment clinic, a standardised protocol is followed to identify potential underlying causes for the chronic pain and enable appropriate onward referrals to existing services for targeted and individualised treatment. Outcomes are assessed by questionnaires at 6 and 12 months after randomisation. The co-primary outcomes are pain severity and pain interference assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory at 12 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes relate to resource use, function, neuropathic pain, mental well-being, use of pain medications, satisfaction with pain relief, pain frequency, capability, health-related quality of life and bodily pain. After trial completion, up to 30 patients in the intervention group will be interviewed about their experiences of the care pathway., Discussion: If shown to be clinically and cost-effective, this care pathway intervention could improve the management of chronic pain after total knee replacement., Trial Registration: ISRCTN registry ( ISRCTN92545361 ), prospectively registered on 30 August 2016.

Background: The aims of this study were to characterise the pain experienced by patients with chronic pain after knee replacement (KR), in whom no apparent 'orthopaedic' problem could be identified, and to establish how many have pain sensitisation problems (including neuropathic pain)., Methods: A total of 44 patients were prospectively evaluated at a multidisciplinary tertiary referral clinic by an orthopaedic surgeon, pain specialist, rheumatologist and physiotherapist. These patients had been pre-screened by an orthopaedic surgeon to remove cases where there was an obvious cause of pain that could be treated with revision surgery. They were then followed up to find out whether any subsequent interventions had occurred., Results: The mean time since surgery was 29 months (range: 3-108 months), and 18% were revision KR. Patients were evaluated for symptoms of nociceptive pain, allodynia, pains elsewhere and psychosocial factors. The patients were categorised into nociceptive pain 43% (n = 19), pain sensitisation 25% (n = 11) and mixed pain 32% (n = 14). Mean Visual Analogue Score (VAS) pain scores were 6.7/10 with high scores for both constant (66%) and intermittent (70%) pain elements, and pain caused high levels of interference with life. Fifty percent suffered depression and 25% suffered widespread pains (more than three pains elsewhere in the body). Patients with widespread pains suffered more pain (p = 0.01) and higher rates of both pain sensitisation (p = 0.07) and thermal allodynia (p < 0.04)., Conclusion: Patients after KR can experience severe pain that interferes with their lives, depression and many have pain sensitisation problems rather than any local, nociceptive cause. We advocate screening patients with unexplained pain after KR for pain sensitisation problems, pains at other sites and depression. Appropriate further treatment and multidisciplinary interventions can then be arranged., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Objectives: To describe the prevalence rates of revision surgery for the treatment of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) for patients undergoing knee replacement, their time trends, the cumulative incidence function of revision for PJI and estimate the burden of PJI at health service level., Design: We analysed revision knee replacements performed due to a diagnosis of PJI and the linked index procedures recorded in the National Joint Registry from 2003 to 2014 for England and Wales. The cohort analysed consisted of 679 010 index primary knee replacements, 33 920 index revision knee replacements and 8247 revision total knee replacements performed due to a diagnosis of PJI. The prevalence rates, their time trends investigated by time from index surgery to revision for PJI, cumulative incidence functions and the burden of PJI (total procedures) were calculated. Overall linear trends were investigated with log-linear regression., Results: The incidence of revision total knee replacement due to PJI at 2 years was 3.2/1000 following primary and 14.4/1000 following revision knee replacement, respectively. The prevalence of revision due to PJI in the 3 months following primary knee replacement has risen by 2.5-fold (95% CI 1.2 to 5.3) from 2005 to 2013 and 7.5-fold (95% CI 1.0 to 56.1) following revision knee replacement. Over 1000 procedures per year are performed as a consequence of knee PJI, an increase of 2.8 from 2005 to 2013. Overall, 75% of revisions were two-stage with an increase in use of single-stage from 7.9% in 2005 to 18.8% in 2014., Conclusions: Although the risk of revision due to PJI following knee replacement is low, it is rising, and coupled with the established and further predicted increased incidence of both primary and revision knee replacements, this represents an increasing and substantial treatment burden for orthopaedic service delivery in England and Wales. This has implications for future service design and the funding of individual and specialist centres., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MLP is the Medical Director of the National Joint Registry and also acts as Chair of the Programme Steering Committee for the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) INFORM program (PGfAR program: RP-PG-1210-12005). The other authors have no conflicts of interest., (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)

Aims: Our aim was to compare kinematic with mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA)., Patients and Methods: We performed a prospective blinded randomised controlled trial to compare the functional outcome of patients undergoing TKA in mechanical alignment (MA) with those in kinematic alignment (KA). A total of 71 patients undergoing TKA were randomised to either kinematic (n = 36) or mechanical alignment (n = 35). Pre- and post-operative hip-knee-ankle radiographs were analysed. The knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), American Knee Society Score, Short Form-36, Euro-Qol (EQ-5D), range of movement (ROM), two minute walk, and timed up and go tests were assessed pre-operatively and at six weeks, three and six months and one year post-operatively., Results: A total of 78% of the kinematically aligned group (28 patients) and 77% of the mechanically aligned group (27 patients) were within 3° of their pre-operative plan. There were no statistically significant differences in the mean KOOS (difference 1.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) -9.4 to 12.1, p = 0.80), EQ-5D (difference 0.8, 95% CI -7.9 to 9.6, p = 0.84), ROM (difference 0.1, 95% CI -6.0 to 6.1, p = 0.99), two minute distance tolerance (difference 20.0, 95% CI -52.8 to 92.8, p = 0.58), or timed up and go (difference 0.78, 95% CI -2.3 to 3.9, p = 0.62) between the groups at one year., Conclusion: Kinematically aligned TKAs appear to have comparable short-term results to mechanically aligned TKAs with no significant differences in function one year post-operatively. Further research is required to see if any theoretical long-term functional benefits of kinematic alignment are realised or if there are any potential effects on implant survival. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1360-8., (©2016 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.)