Search

Background and Objective: As the presentation of pulmonary nodules increases, the importance of a safe and accurate method of sampling peripheral pulmonary nodules is highlighted. First‐generation robotic bronchoscopy has successfully assisted navigation and improved peripheral reach during bronchoscopy. Integrating tool‐in‐lesion tomosynthesis (TiLT) may further improve yield. Methods: We performed a first‐in‐human clinical trial of a new robotic electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy system with integrated digital tomosynthesis technology (Galaxy System, Noah Medical). Patients with moderate‐risk peripheral pulmonary nodules were enrolled in the study. Robotic bronchoscopy was performed using electromagnetic navigation with TiLT‐assisted lesion guidance. Non‐specific results were followed up until either a clear diagnosis was achieved or repeat radiology at 6 months demonstrated stability. Results: Eighteen patients (19 nodules) were enrolled. The average lesion size was 20 mm, and the average distance from the pleura was 11.6 mm. The target was successfully reached in 100% of nodules, and the biopsy tool was visualized inside the target lesion in all cases. A confirmed specific diagnosis was achieved in 17 nodules, 13 of which were malignant. In one patient, radiological monitoring confirmed a true non‐malignant result. This translates to a yield of 89.5% (strict) to 94.7% (intermediate). Complications included one pneumothorax requiring observation only and another requiring an overnight chest drain. There was one case of severe pneumonia following the procedure. Conclusion: In this first‐in‐human study, second‐generation robotic bronchoscopy using electromagnetic navigation combined with integrated digital tomosynthesis was feasible with an acceptable safety profile and demonstrated a high diagnostic yield for small peripheral lung nodules. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Purpose Methods Results Conclusion Digital tomosynthesis has shown potential for increasing specificity and sensitivity compared to radiography for low‐dose chest imaging. Prior investigation of the s‐DCT system indicated potential, but additional iteration with improved scan speed, power, and angular span was necessary for translation.The study aims to demonstrate and characterize a second‐generation stationary digital chest tomosynthesis (s‐DCT) scanner with increased x‐ray energy, tube current, and larger angular span.The second‐generation s‐DCT system employed a meter‐long linear carbon nanotube (CNT) source array integrated with a digital detector and patient imaging table. Tube output, focal spot size, modulation transfer function (MTF), artifact spread function (ASF), and imaging performance were evaluated. A lung phantom with simulated nodules was imaged for clinical task‐based demonstration.The scanner achieved a 6 s scan time, significantly improved from the prior generation's 16 s. The x‐ray tube exhibited good current stability, with 20.4 ± 0.6 mA tube current and focal spot size aligned with specifications (IEC 0.8). The MTF confirmed enhanced spatial resolution of 2.4 lp/mm, comparable to commercial chest tomosynthesis systems. The ASF indicated improved depth resolution (5.2 mm, previously 9.5 mm). Phantom imaging showcased visualization of both high and low‐attenuation lung nodules.The second‐generation s‐DCT system exhibited improved performance in terms of tube power, scan time, and image quality. Enhanced in‐plane and depth resolution, along with faster imaging, suggest potential clinical benefits for improved diagnoses. Further clinical validation is warranted to ascertain the system's clinical utility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We aimed to determine the value of standalone and supplemental automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) in detecting cancers in an opportunistic screening setting with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and compare this combined screening method to DBT and ABUS alone in women older than 39 years with BI‐RADS B‐D density categories. In this prospective opportunistic screening study, 3466 women aged 39 or older with BI‐RADS B‐D density categories and with a mean age of 50 were included. The screening protocol consisted of DBT mediolateral‐oblique views, 2D craniocaudal views, and ABUS with three projections for both breasts. ABUS was evaluated blinded to mammography findings. Statistical analysis evaluated diagnostic performance for DBT, ABUS, and combined workflows. Twenty‐nine cancers were screen‐detected. ABUS and DBT exhibited the same cancer detection rates (CDR) at 7.5/1000 whereas DBT + ABUS showed 8.4/1000, with ABUS contributing an additional CDR of 0.9/1000. Standalone ABUS outperformed DBT in detecting 12.5% more invasive cancers. DBT displayed better accuracy (95%) compared to ABUS (88%) and combined approach (86%). Sensitivities for DBT and ABUS were the same (84%), with DBT + ABUS showing a higher rate (94%). DBT outperformed ABUS in specificity (95% vs. 88%). DBT + ABUS exhibited a higher recall rate (14.89%) compared to ABUS (12.38%) and DBT (6.03%) (p <.001). Standalone ABUS detected more invasive cancers compared to DBT, with a higher recall rate. The combined approach showed a higher CDR by detecting one additional cancer per thousand. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Purpose Methods Results Conclusions Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has outpaced digital mammography in clinical adoption in the United States; however, substantial technological limitations remain to image quality in DBT, including undersampling from a one‐dimensional (1D) scan geometry, x‐ray source motion during acquisition, and patient motion artifacts from long exam times.A thermionic cathode x‐ray system employing two‐dimensional (2D, planar) multiple x‐ray‐source arrays (MXA) is proposed to improve DBT image quality.A 1D MXA, consisting of a linear array of thermionic cathodes was used to simulate a 2D MXA. The 1D MXA included 11 focal spots separated by a distance of Δd${{\Delta}}d$ = 23 mm. The 11 cathodes were paired with 11 molybdenum 50 mm diameter anode disks, mounted on a rotating shaft within a single vacuum enclosure. Image quality was investigated as a function of MXA configuration by integrating the 1D MXA with a 200 × 250 mm2 flat panel detector at a source‐to‐detector distance of 630 mm, resulting in a 20° tomographic arc. To simulate a 2D MXA, the detector (with phantom) was translated orthogonally to the linear array by a distance (δ$\delta $) ranging from δ$\delta $ = 0 mm (conventional 1D) to δ$\delta $ = 57 mm. All sources operated at 30 kV with 80 mA and 4.5 mAs/pulse, yielding ∼100 mAs per DBT dataset. DBT reconstructions involved 22 projections and used filtered backprojection with a ramp and Hann apodization filter. Volumetric reconstructions for each source were weighted by sampling differences between sources, and averaged. Image quality was assessed in terms of contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), background clutter noise and power spectrum, and slice sensitivity profile (SSP) using a set of physical phantoms, including: (i) contrast‐detail signals coupled to spherical clutter (PMMA in air); (ii) an SSP phantom; (iii) a commercial “breast” phantom (CIRS BR3D, Sun Nuclear, Norfolk, VA); and (iv) bovine muscle.Background clutter noise amplitude reduced monotonically from the 1D MXA (σclutter = 5.9 A.U., δ$\delta $ = 0 mm) and 2D MXA arrays with increasing δ$\delta $, with statistical significance between the 1D MXA and 2D MXA with δ$\delta $ = 57 mm (σclutter = 5.0 A.U., p < 0.001). The contrast‐detail/clutter phantom demonstrated CNR from the 2D MXA (δ  = 57 mm) outperforming the 1D MXA in all combinations of contrast and detail. 2D power spectrum analysis of clutter demonstrated a pronounced Fourier domain null cone for the 1D MXA in the anterior field‐of‐view (away from the 1D MXA position), whereas the 2D MXA geometry (δ = 57 mm) did not exhibit the null cone. The SSP was 15%–50% narrower (FWHM) for the 2D versus the 1D geometry, across all reconstruction setups.The advantages of a 2D source geometry for DBT imaging were demonstrated quantitatively compared to a conventional 1D line of x‐ray sources. The improvement in the 2D geometry was attributed both to improved Fourier domain sampling and reduced SSP. We conclude that 2D MXA sources have the potential to substantially improve DBT imaging in comparison to existing commercial DBT systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

(1) Background: 3D printable materials with accurately defined iodine content enable the development and production of radiological phantoms that simulate human tissues, including lesions after contrast administration in medical imaging with X-rays. These phantoms provide accurate, stable and reproducible models with defined iodine concentrations, and 3D printing allows maximum flexibility and minimal development and production time, allowing the simulation of anatomically correct anthropomorphic replication of lesions and the production of calibration and QA standards in a typical medical research facility. (2) Methods: Standard printing resins were doped with an iodine contrast agent and printed using a consumer 3D printer, both (resins and printer) available from major online marketplaces, to produce printed specimens with iodine contents ranging from 0 to 3.0% by weight, equivalent to 0 to 3.85% elemental iodine per volume, covering the typical levels found in patients. The printed samples were scanned in a micro-CT scanner to measure the properties of the materials in the range of the iodine concentrations used. (3) Results: Both mass density and attenuation show a linear dependence on iodine concentration (R2 = 1.00), allowing highly accurate, stable, and predictable results. (4) Conclusions: Standard 3D printing resins can be doped with liquids, avoiding the problem of sedimentation, resulting in perfectly homogeneous prints with accurate dopant content. Iodine contrast agents are perfectly suited to dope resins with appropriate iodine concentrations to radiologically mimic tissues after iodine uptake. In combination with computer-aided design, this can be used to produce printed objects with precisely defined iodine concentrations in the range of up to a few percent of elemental iodine, with high precision and anthropomorphic shapes. Applications include radiographic phantoms for detectability studies and calibration standards in projective X-ray imaging modalities, such as contrast-enhanced dual energy mammography (abbreviated CEDEM, CEDM, TICEM, or CESM depending on the equipment manufacturer), and 3-dimensional modalities like CT, including spectral and dual energy CT (DECT), and breast tomosynthesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: We evaluated the role of contrast-enhanced mammogram (CEM) in the characterization of circumscribed lesions detected in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and correlated with histopathology. Methods: A retrospective study was done on 205 circumscribed breast masses detected with DBT and for whom CEM was done before core biopsy/excision biopsy. Morphology of lesion enhancement was noted at a 2-min CEM image and depending on the enhancement pattern, they were classified as benign, malignant, and indeterminate. Indeterminate lesions were further characterized by contrast kinetics at 8 min and divided into benign and malignant lesions. The results were correlated with histopathology reports. Results: Among the 205 lesions, 158 were benign and 47 were malignant by histopathology. All 47 malignant cases were diagnosed as malignant (sensitivity-100%) and 150 out of 158 benign lesions were diagnosed as benign by CEM (specificity-95%). Eight benign lesions were reported as malignant (false positive) by CEM. Positive predictive value was 85.4% (47/55); negative predictive value (NPV) was 100% (150/150); accuracy was 96% (197/205). Conclusions: The high sensitivity of CEM in our study suggests that CEM helps in the early diagnosis of benign-looking circumscribed breast malignancies. The high NPV of CEM helps to avoid unnecessary biopsies and interventions in benign lesions. Advances in knowledge: This study describes the contrast enhancement pattern of benign and malignant circumscribed breast lesions and thereby helps in the diagnosis of malignancy at an early stage. CEM is a promising adjunct tool since it offers functional imaging as a supplement to anatomical imaging by DBT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women accounting for about 30% of all new cancer cases and the incidence is constantly increasing. Implementation of mammographic screening has contributed to a reduction in breast cancer mortality of at least 20% over the last 30 years. Screening programs usually include all women irrespective of their risk of developing breast cancer and with age being the only determining factor. This approach has some recognized limitations, including underdiagnosis, false positive cases, and overdiagnosis. Indeed, breast cancer remains a major cause of cancer-related deaths in women undergoing cancer screening. Supplemental imaging modalities, including digital breast tomosynthesis, ultrasound, breast MRI, and, more recently, contrast-enhanced mammography, are available and have already shown potential to further increase the diagnostic performances. Use of breast MRI is recommended in high-risk women and women with extremely dense breasts. Artificial intelligence has also shown promising results to support risk categorization and interval cancer reduction. The implementation of a risk-stratified approach instead of a "one-size-fits-all" approach may help to improve the benefit-to-harm ratio as well as the cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening. Key Points: Regular mammography should still be considered the mainstay of the breast cancer screening. High-risk women and women with extremely dense breast tissue should use MRI for supplemental screening or US if MRI is not available. Women need to participate actively in the decision to undergo personalized screening. Key recommendations: Mammography is an effective imaging tool to diagnose breast cancer in an early stage and to reduce breast cancer mortality (evidence level I). Until more evidence is available to move to a personalized approach, regular mammography should be considered the mainstay of the breast cancer screening. High-risk women should start screening earlier; first with yearly breast MRI which can be supplemented by yearly or biennial mammography starting at 35–40 years old (evidence level I). Breast MRI screening should be also offered to women with extremely dense breasts (evidence level I). If MRI is not available, ultrasound can be performed as an alternative, although the added value of supplemental ultrasound regarding cancer detection remains limited. Individual screening recommendations should be made through a shared decision-making process between women and physicians. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Evaluate microcalcification detectability in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and synthetic 2D mammography (SM) for different acquisition setups using a virtual imaging trial (VIT) approach. Materials and methods: Medio-lateral oblique (MLO) DBT acquisitions on eight patients were performed at twice the automatic exposure controlled (AEC) dose. The noise was added to the projections to simulate a given dose trajectory. Virtual microcalcification models were added to a given projection set using an in-house VIT framework. Three setups were evaluated: (1) standard acquisition with 25 projections at AEC dose, (2) 25 projections with a convex dose distribution, and (3) sparse setup with 13 projections, every second one over the angular range. The total scan dose and angular range remained constant. DBT volume reconstruction and synthetic mammography image generation were performed using a Siemens prototype algorithm. Lesion detectability was assessed through a Jackknife-alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) study with six observers. Results: For DBT, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.97 ± 0.01 for the standard, 0.95 ± 0.02 for the convex, and 0.89 ± 0.03 for the sparse setup. There was no significant difference between standard and convex dose distributions (p = 0.309). Sparse projections significantly reduced detectability (p = 0.001). Synthetic images had a higher AUC with the convex setup, though not significantly (p = 0.435). DBT required four times more reading time than synthetic mammography. Discussion: A convex setup did not significantly improve detectability in DBT compared to the standard setup. Synthetic images exhibited a non-significant increase in detectability with the convex setup. Sparse setup significantly reduced detectability in both DBT and synthetic mammography. Clinical relevance statement: This virtual imaging trial study allowed the design and efficient testing of different dose distribution trajectories with real mammography images, using a dose-neutral protocol. Key Points: • In DBT, a convex dose distribution did not increase the detectability of microcalcifications compared to the current standard setup but increased detectability for the SM images. • A sparse setup decreased microcalcification detectability in both DBT and SM images compared to the convex and current clinical setups. • Optimal microcalcification cluster detection in the system studied was achieved using either the standard or convex dose setting, with the default number of projections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in cases with breast cancer is considered a bad prognostic sign. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) versus unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (UE-MRI + DBT) in predicting LVI in women with pathologically confirmed breast cancer. Methods: This prospective self-controlled study enrolled a total of 70 cases of pathologically proven breast cancer. All the patients underwent tomosynthesis, non-contrast, and post-contrast MRI. Depending on the broken halo sign seen in tomosynthesis, peritumoral edema, dark rim diffusion at diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values evaluated in MRI. Results: The accuracy of LVI detection by tomosynthesis was 58%; unenhanced and enhanced MRI had the same results at 60%. The accuracy of detecting LVI was raised to 64% by combining the tomosynthesis results with unenhanced MRI. Conclusions: Tomosynthesis parameters are promising tools in detecting LVI in breast cancer with better diagnostic accuracy in combination with unenhanced MRI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Current breast cancer screening relies on mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and breast ultrasound. In select populations, breast MRI is also of great utility. However, multiple factors limit widespread use of breast MRI for screening. Efforts have been made to increase the availability of breast MRI for screening, in large part due to the increased cancer detection rate of breast MRI compared to mammography. Techniques include shortening standard breast MRI protocols with the potential for accommodating MRI screening in a higher number of patients. This review will explain the role of abbreviated breast MRI and ultrafast breast MRI in breast imaging, and detail how these approaches differ from standard dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI. In addition, limitations and advantages of these techniques will also be discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses the proposed U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation on breast cancer screening for women in their 40s. It addresses the arguments against screening in this age group, such as false-positive results and overdiagnosis, and provides evidence to counter these claims. The article highlights the flaws in the discussion around overdiagnosis and emphasizes the importance of well-designed studies. It also argues that early randomized controlled trials used to inform screening policy are outdated and flawed. The article concludes by emphasizing the benefits of screening for women in their 40s, as breast cancer is diagnosed in thousands of women in this age group annually in the United States. [Extracted from the article]

The article discusses the latest draft recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force on breast cancer screening for women in their 40s. The author argues that relying on outdated randomized controlled trials does not serve women well, as technology and screening methods have advanced since then. Meta-analyses and observational trials have shown the clear mortality benefit of screening women in their 40s. The author emphasizes that the risks of screening are nonlethal compared to the potential harm of diagnosing breast cancer at an advanced stage. They advocate for women to have the autonomy to make decisions about their own health. [Extracted from the article]

The current study proposed and evaluated "residual squeeze and excitation attention gate" (rSEAG), a novel network that can improve image quality by reducing distortion attributed to artifacts. This method was established by modifying the Cycle Generative Adversarial Network (cycleGAN)-based generator network using projection data for pre-reconstruction processing in digital breast tomosynthesis. Residual squeeze and excitation were installed in the bridge of the generator network, and the attention gate was installed in the skip connection between the encoder and decoder. Based on the radiation dose index (exposure index and division index) incident on the detector, the cases approved by the ethics committee and used for the study were classified as reference (675 projection images) and object (675 projection images). For the cases, unsupervised data containing a mixture of cases with and without masses were used. The cases were trained using cycleGAN with rSEAG and the conventional networks (ResUNet and U-Net). For testing, predictive processing was performed on cases (60 projection images) that were not used for learning. Images were generated using filtered backprojection reconstruction (kernel: Ramachandran and Lakshminarayanan) from projection data for testing data and without pre-reconstruction processing data (evaluation: in-focus plane). The distortion was evaluated using perception-based image quality evaluation (PIQE) analysis, texture analysis (feature: "Homogeneity" and "Contrast"), and a statistical model with a Gumbel distribution. PIQE has a low rSEAG value. Texture analysis showed that rSEAG and a network without cycleGAN were similar in terms of the "Contrast" feature. In dense breasts, ResUNet had the lowest "Contrast" feature and U-Net had differences between cases. The maximal variations in the Gumbel plot, rSEAG reduced the high-frequency ripple artifacts. In this study, rSEAG could improve distortion and reduce ripple artifacts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aiming to offset image quality limitations in radiographs due to superimposition, this study investigates the diagnostic potential of appendicular skeleton tomosynthesis. Eight cadaveric extremities (four hands and feet) were examined employing the prototypical tomosynthesis mode of a twin robotic X-ray scanner. 12 protocols with varying sweep angles (10, 20 vs. 40°), frame rates (13 vs. 26 fps), and tube voltages (60 vs. 80 kV) were compared to radiographs. Four radiologists separately evaluated cortical and trabecular bone visualization and fracture patterns. Interreader reliability was assessed based on the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Radiation dose in radiography was 0.59 ± 0.20 dGy * cm2 versus 0.11 ± 0.00 to 2.46 ± 0.17 dGy * cm2 for tomosynthesis. Cortical bone display was inferior for radiographs compared to 40° and 20° tomosynthesis. Best results were ascertained for the 80 kV/40°/26 fps protocol. Trabecular bone depiction was also superior in tomosynthesis (p ≤ 0.009) and best with the 80 kV/10°/26 fps setting. Interreader reliability was moderate for cortical bone display (ICC 0.521, 95% confidence interval 0.356–0.641) and good for trabecular bone (0.759, 0.697–0.810). Diagnostic accuracy for articular involvement and multifragment situations was higher in tomosynthesis (93.8–100%/92.2–100%) vs. radiography (85.9%/82.8%.). Diagnostic confidence was also better in tomosynthesis (p ≤ 0.003). Compared to radiography, tomosynthesis allows for superior assessability of cortical and trabecular bone and fracture morphology, especially at high framerates. Operating on a multipurpose X-ray system, tomosynthesis of the appendicular skeleton can be performed without additional scanner hardware. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Mammography (MG) has demonstrated its effectiveness in diminishing mortality and advanced-stage breast cancer incidences in breast screening initiatives. Notably, research has accentuated the superior diagnostic efficacy and cost-effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). However, the scope of evidence validating the cost-effectiveness of DBT remains limited, prompting a requisite for more comprehensive investigation. The present study aimed to rigorously evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DBT plus MG (DBT-MG) compared to MG alone within the framework of Taiwan's National Health Insurance program. Methods: All parameters for the Markov decision tree model, encompassing event probabilities, costs, and utilities (quality-adjusted life years, QALYs), were sourced from reputable literature, expert opinions, and official records. With 10,000 iterations, a 2-year cycle length, a 30-year time horizon, and a 2% annual discount rate, the analysis determined the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) to compare the cost-effectiveness of the two screening methods. Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were also conducted to demonstrate the robustness of findings. Results: The ICER of DBT-MG compared to MG was US$5971.5764/QALYs. At a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of US$33,004 (Gross Domestic Product of Taiwan in 2021) per QALY, more than 98% of the probabilistic simulations favored adopting DBT-MG versus MG. The one-way sensitivity analysis also shows that the ICER depended heavily on recall rates, biopsy rates, and positive predictive value (PPV2). Conclusion: DBT-MG shows enhanced diagnostic efficacy, potentially diminishing recall costs. While exhibiting a higher biopsy rate, DBT-MG aids in the detection of early-stage breast cancers, reduces recall rates, and exhibits notably superior cost-effectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mammographic density (MD) assessment is subject to inter- and intra-observer variability. An automated method, such as Quantra software, could be a useful tool for an objective and reproducible MD assessment. Our purpose was to evaluate the performance of Quantra software in assessing MD, according to BI-RADS® Atlas Fifth Edition recommendations, verifying the degree of agreement with the gold standard, given by the consensus of two breast radiologists. A total of 5009 screening examinations were evaluated by two radiologists and analysed by Quantra software to assess MD. The agreement between the three assigned values was expressed as intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The agreement between the software and the two readers (R1 and R2) was moderate with ICC values of 0.725 and 0.713, respectively. A better agreement was demonstrated between the software's assessment and the average score of the values assigned by the two radiologists, with an index of 0.793, which reflects a good correlation. Quantra software appears a promising tool in supporting radiologists in the MD assessment and could be part of a personalised screening protocol soon. However, some fine-tuning is needed to improve its accuracy, reduce its tendency to overestimate, and ensure it excludes high-density structures from its assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in cases with breast cancer is considered a bad prognostic sign. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) versus unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (UE-MRI + DBT) in predicting LVI in women with pathologically confirmed breast cancer. Methods This prospective self-controlled study enrolled a total of 70 cases of pathologically proven breast cancer. All the patients underwent tomosynthesis, non-contrast, and post-contrast MRI. Depending on the broken halo sign seen in tomosynthesis, peritumoral edema, dark rim diffusion at diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values evaluated in MRI. Results The accuracy of LVI detection by tomosynthesis was 58%; unenhanced and enhanced MRI had the same results at 60%. The accuracy of detecting LVI was raised to 64% by combining the tomosynthesis results with unenhanced MRI. Conclusions Tomosynthesis parameters are promising tools in detecting LVI in breast cancer with better diagnostic accuracy in combination with unenhanced MRI.

Abstract To explore the diagnostic efficacy of tomosynthesis spot compression (TSC) compared with conventional spot compression (CSC) for ambiguous findings on full-field digital mammography (FFDM). In this retrospective study, 122 patients (including 108 patients with dense breasts) with ambiguous FFDM findings were imaged with both CSC and TSC. Two radiologists independently reviewed the images and evaluated lesions using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Pathology or at least a 1-year follow-up imaging was used as the reference standard. Diagnostic efficacies of CSC and TSC were compared, including area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). The mean glandular dose was recorded and compared for TSC and CSC. Of the 122 patients, 63 had benign lesions and 59 had malignant lesions. For Reader 1, the following diagnostic efficacies of TSC were significantly higher than those of CSC: AUC (0.988 vs. 0.906, P = 0.001), accuracy (93.4% vs. 77.8%, P = 0.001), specificity (87.3% vs. 63.5%, P = 0.002), PPV (88.1% vs. 70.5%, P = 0.010), and NPV (100% vs. 90.9%, P = 0.029). For Reader 2, TSC showed higher AUC (0.949 vs. 0.909, P = 0.011) and accuracy (83.6% vs. 71.3%, P = 0.022) than CSC. The mean glandular dose of TSC was higher than that of CSC (1.85 ± 0.53 vs. 1.47 ± 0.58 mGy, P

Although digital breast tomosynthesis has higher sensitivity than digital mammography and at least as high specificity, digital mammography remains the most common method for conducting mammographic screening. At the same time, mammography systems are now delivered "DBT-ready" and can be used for either digital mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis. In this paper, we ask whether it is ethically permissible to use such equipment for digital mammography, given its lower sensitivity. We argue it is not, and that clinics are ethically required to use their DBT-ready equipment to screen with digital breast tomosynthesis whenever this is practically possible. Our argument relies on a comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and a hypothesized improvement in the image quality of digital mammography. Critical relevance statement: Women may lose out on the benefits of screening with digital breast tomosynthesis when DBT-ready equipment is used to screen with digital mammography; we argue that this practice is ethically problematic. Key Points: Digital breast tomosynthesis finds more cases of breast cancer than digital mammography. Mammography equipment can often be used to screen with both digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography. When they can, clinics are ethically required to use existing equipment to screen with digital breast tomosynthesis instead of digital mammography. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although DBT is the standard initial imaging modality for women with focal breast symptoms, the importance of ultrasound has grown rapidly in the past decades. Therefore, the Breast UltraSound Trial (BUST) focused on assessing the diagnostic value of ultrasound and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) for the evaluation of breast symptoms by reversing the order of breast imaging; first performing ultrasound followed by DBT. This side-study of the BUST evaluates patients' perceptions of ultrasound and DBT in a reversed setting. Methods: After imaging, 1181/1276 BUST participants completed a survey consisting of open and closed questions regarding both exams (mean age 47.2, ±11.74). Additionally, a different subset of BUST participants (n = 29) participated in six focus group interviews 18–24 months after imaging to analyze their imaging experiences in depth. Results: A total of 55.3% of women reported reluctance to undergoing DBT, primarily due of pain, while the vast majority also find bilateral DBT reassuring (87.3%). Thematic analysis identified themes related to 1) imaging reluctance (pain/burden, result, and breast harm) and 2) ultrasound and DBT perceptions. Regarding the latter, the theme comfort underscores DBT as burdensome and painful, while ultrasound is largely perceived as non-burdensome. Ultrasound is also particularly valued for its interactive nature, as highlighted in the theme interaction. Perceived effectiveness reflects women's interest in bilateral breast evaluation with DBT and the visibility of lesions, while they express more uncertainty about the reliability of ultrasound. Emotional impact portrays DBT as reassuring for many women, whereas opinions on the reassurance provided by ultrasound are more diverse. Additional themes include costs, protocols and privacy. Conclusions: Ultrasound is highly tolerated, and particularly valued is the interaction with the radiologist. Nearly half of women express reluctance towards DBT; nevertheless, a large portion report feeling more confident after undergoing bilateral DBT, reassuring them of the absence of abnormalities. Understanding patients' perceptions of breast imaging examinations is of great value when optimizing diagnostic pathways. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This case series highlights the role of Hologic Genius AI™ Detection solution in improving breast cancer detection rates. Through AI-driven technology, Genius AI Detection solution enhances the accuracy and efficiency of identifying suspicious breast lesions, leading to early diagnosis and intervention. By leveraging deep learning algorithms, Genius AI Detection solution provides actionable computer-aided detection (CAD) findings in identifying and aiding in the interpretation of potential abnormalities in breast tomosynthesis images. It also helps prioritize cases to potentially improve reading efficiency ultimately impacting breast imaging and patient care. Case Presentation: We present three challenging cases from a routine screening population, wherein patients flagged as high-priority or suspicious for malignancy by Genius AI Detection solution were subsequently diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and invasive lobular carcinoma that were all validated through biopsy and histopathological examination. We demonstrate the clinical utility of Hologic Genius AI Detection solution in detecting various types of breast cancers, including DCIS in a young patient with dense breast tissue and a family history of breast cancer, IDC in a patient with scattered fibroglandular densities and no family history, and invasive lobular carcinoma in a patient with similar breast density characteristics and no family history of breast cancer. Conclusion: The cases exemplify how Hologic Genius AI Detection solution can potentially improve breast cancer detection in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To assess the diagnostic performance of 3D automated breast ultrasound (3D-ABUS) in breast cancer screening in a clinical setting. Materials and methods: All patients who had 3D-ABUS between January 2014 and January 2022 for screening were included in this retrospective study. The images were reported by 1 of 6 breast radiologists based on the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (BI-RADS). The 3D-ABUS was reviewed together with the digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Recall rate, biopsy rate, positive predictive value (PPV) and cancer detection yield were calculated. Results: In total, 3616 studies were performed in 1555 women (breast density C/D 95.5% (n = 3455/3616), breast density A/B 4.0% (n = 144/3616), density unknown (0.5% (n = 17/3616)). A total of 259 lesions were detected on 3D-ABUS (87.6% (n = 227/259) masses and 12.4% (n = 32/259) architectural distortions). The recall rate was 5.2% (n = 188/3616) (CI 4.5–6.0%) with only 36.7% (n = 69/188) cases recalled to another date. Moreover, recall declined over time. There were 3.4% (n = 123/3616) biopsies performed, with 52.8% (n = 65/123) biopsies due to an abnormality detected in 3D-ABUS alone. Ten of 65 lesions were malignant, resulting in a positive predictive value (PPV) of 15.4% (n = 10/65) (CI 7.6–26.5%)). The cancer detection yield of 3D-ABUS is 2.77 per 1000 screening tests (CI 1.30–5.1). Conclusion: The cancer detection yield of 3D-ABUS in a real clinical screening setting is comparable to the results reported in previous prospective studies, with lower recall and biopsy rates. 3D-ABUS also may be an alternative for screening when mammography is not possible or declined. Clinical relevance statement: 3D automated breast ultrasound screening performance in a clinical setting is comparable to previous prospective studies, with better recall and biopsy rates. Key Points: • 3D automated breast ultrasound is a reliable and reproducible tool that provides a three-dimensional representation of the breast and allows image visualisation in axial, coronal and sagittal. • The diagnostic performance of 3D automated breast ultrasound in a real clinical setting is comparable to its performance in previously published prospective studies, with improved recall and biopsy rates. • 3D automated breast ultrasound is a useful adjunct to mammography in dense breasts and may be an alternative for screening when mammography is not possible or declined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This work aims to compare the interval cancer rate and interval cancer characteristics between women screened with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) + digital mammography (DM) and those screened with DM alone. Methods: The interval cancer rate and interval cancer characteristics of the study population included in the Córdoba Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (CBTST) were compared to a contemporary control population screened with DM. The tumour characteristics of screen-detected and interval cancers were also compared. Contingency tables were used to compare interval cancer rates. The chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare the qualitative characteristics of the cancers whereas Student's t test and the Mann–Whitney U test were used to analyse quantitative features. Results: A total of 16,068 screening exams with DBT + DM were conducted within the CBTST (mean age 57.59 ± 5.9 [SD]) between January 2015 and December 2016 (study population). In parallel, 23,787 women (mean age 58.89 ± 5.9 standard deviation [SD]) were screened with DM (control population). The interval cancer rate was lower in the study population than in the control population (15 [0.93‰; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73, 1.14] vs 43 [1.8‰; 95% CI: 1.58, 2.04] respectively; p = 0.045). The difference in rate was more marked in women with dense breasts (0.95‰ in the study population vs 3.17‰ in the control population; p = 0.031). Interval cancers were smaller in the study population than in the control population (p = 0.031). Conclusions: The interval cancer rate was lower in women screened with DBT + DM compared to those screened with DM alone. These differences were more pronounced in women with dense breasts. Clinical relevance statement: Women screened using tomosynthesis and digital mammography had a lower rate of interval cancer than women screened with digital mammography, with the greatest difference in the interval cancer rate observed in women with dense breasts. Key Points: • The interval cancer rate was lower in the study population (digital breast tomosynthesis [DBT] + digital mammography [DM]) than in the control population (DM). • The difference in interval cancer rates was more pronounced in women with dense breasts. • Interval cancers were smaller in the study population (DBT + DM) than in the control population (DM). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Showing the mammogram images in different view enables the radiological to recognize more early details about the cancer tumour. The synthetic view was addressed to find the overlapping among the overlapped structural information of the x-ray breast mammography images. The details of the proposed method to produce a synthetic mammography image using the x-ray breast cancer mammogram images from each CranioCaudual (CC) and MedioLateral-Oblique (MLO) view have been introduced in this article. There are five phases to the proposed method. In the first phase, the cancer tumor has been identified in the full-field x-ray mammography images. The cancerous tumor has been secondly recognized and highlighted as a region of interest. A technique to collect data from the cancer tumor and identify the areas of interest on the cancer mass has been discussed in the third phase. In the fourth phase, formatting the points of interest within the context of advanced features has been implemented. The final phase demonstrates how to execute the synthetic digital process using the supervised learning methodology. Several contributions have been presented based on the proposed method, which are facilitate the computer aided detection application in context of the digital breast Tomosynthesis. Compared with other method, the proposed method has shown its ability to save memory and running time resources. Beside of the digital synthetic view, the proposed method was detected the breast tumour in x-ray breast mammography images. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To construct and validate radiomics models that utilize ultrasound (US) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images independently and in combination to non-invasively predict the Ki-67 status in breast cancer. Materials and Methods: 149 breast cancer women who underwent DBT and US scans were retrospectively enrolled from June 2018 to August 2023 in total. Radiomics features were acquired from both the DBT and US images, then selected and reduced in dimensionality using several screening approaches. Establish radiomics models based on DBT, and US separately and combined. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity were utilized to validate the predictive ability of the models. The decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical applicability of the models. The output of the classifier with the best AUC performance was converted into Rad-score and was regarded as Rad-Score model. A nomogram was constructed using the logistic regression method, integrating the Rad-Score and clinical factors. The model's stability was assessed through AUC, calibration curves, and DCA. Results: Support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), and random forest (RF) were trained to establish radiomics models with the selected features, with SVM showing optimal results. The AUC values for three models (US_SVM, DBT_SVM, and merge_SVM) were 0.668, 0.704, and 0.800 respectively. The DeLong test indicated a notable disparity in the area under the curve (AUC) between merge_SVM and US_SVM (p = 0.048), while there was no substantial variability between merge_SVM and DBT_SVM (p = 0.149). The DCA curve indicates that merge_SVM is superior to unimodal models in predicting high Ki-67 level, showing more clinical values. The nomogram integrating Rad-Score with tumor size obtained the better performance in test set (AUC: 0.818) and had more clinical net. Conclusion: The fusion radiomics model performed better in predicting the Ki-67 expression level of breast carcinoma, but the gain effect is limited; thus, DBT is preferred as a preoperative diagnosis mode when resources are limited. Nomogram offers predictive advantages over other methods and can be a valuable tool for predicting Ki-67 levels in BC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To explore the diagnostic efficacy of tomosynthesis spot compression (TSC) compared with conventional spot compression (CSC) for ambiguous findings on full-field digital mammography (FFDM). In this retrospective study, 122 patients (including 108 patients with dense breasts) with ambiguous FFDM findings were imaged with both CSC and TSC. Two radiologists independently reviewed the images and evaluated lesions using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Pathology or at least a 1-year follow-up imaging was used as the reference standard. Diagnostic efficacies of CSC and TSC were compared, including area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). The mean glandular dose was recorded and compared for TSC and CSC. Of the 122 patients, 63 had benign lesions and 59 had malignant lesions. For Reader 1, the following diagnostic efficacies of TSC were significantly higher than those of CSC: AUC (0.988 vs. 0.906, P = 0.001), accuracy (93.4% vs. 77.8%, P = 0.001), specificity (87.3% vs. 63.5%, P = 0.002), PPV (88.1% vs. 70.5%, P = 0.010), and NPV (100% vs. 90.9%, P = 0.029). For Reader 2, TSC showed higher AUC (0.949 vs. 0.909, P = 0.011) and accuracy (83.6% vs. 71.3%, P = 0.022) than CSC. The mean glandular dose of TSC was higher than that of CSC (1.85 ± 0.53 vs. 1.47 ± 0.58 mGy, P < 0.001) but remained within the safety limit. TSC provides better diagnostic efficacy with a slightly higher but tolerable radiation dose than CSC. Therefore, TSC may be a candidate modality for patients with ambiguous findings on FFDM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a relatively new imaging technique that allows morphologic, anatomic and functional imaging of the breast. The aim of our study was to validate contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) compared to mammography (MMG) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in daily clinical practice. This retrospective study included 316 consecutive patients who underwent MMG, DBT and CEM at the Centre for Prevention and Diagnosis of Chronic Diseases of Primorsko-goranska County. Two breast radiologists independently analyzed the image data, without available anamnestic information and without the possibility of comparison with previous images, to determine the presence of suspicious lesions and their morphological features according to the established criteria of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon. The diagnostic value of MMG, DBT and CEM was assessed by ROC analysis. The interobserver agreement was excellent. CEM showed higher diagnostic accuracy in terms of sensitivity and specificity compared to MMG and DBT, the reporting time for CEM was significantly shorter, and CEM findings resulted in a significantly lower proportion of equivocal findings (BI-RADS 0), suggesting fewer additional procedures. In conclusion, CEM achieves high diagnostic accuracy while maintaining simplicity, reproducibility and applicability in complex clinical settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: In April 2020, standard two-dimensional (2D) full-field digital mammograms were replaced with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and synthesised 2D views for symptomatic breast clinics. This study aimed to evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) for malignancy in DBT-detected Architectural distortion (AD). Methods: All mammogram reports with the word "distortion" were assessed between April 2020 and October 2022. There were 458 mammograms with the word "distortion." After excluding mammograms with no distortion (n = 128), post-surgical distortion (n = 173), distortion with mass (n = 33), and unchanged distortion (n = 14), there were 111 patients with pure distortion. Correlation with histopathology was obtained where possible. All patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years. Results: Forty-two out of 111 patients (37.84%) with AD had a normal ultrasound (US) and were discharged. Fifty-five (49.5%) patients had sonographic correlation corresponding to the distortion, leading to US-guided biopsy. Thirteen (23.6%) had tomosynthesis-guided biopsy, and one had a skin biopsy. The PPV for malignancy was 42.34%. Malignancy diagnoses were higher with US-guided biopsies than tomosynthesis-guided biopsies, 78.1% and 30%, respectively. Conclusion: With a total malignancy rate of 42.34%, DBT-detected AD has a high enough PPV for malignancy to justify selective tissue sampling if a sonographic correlate is present or with suspicious mammograms. The chances of malignancy are higher when a sonographic correlate corresponding to AD is present. Advances in knowledge: AD on DBT/synthesized mammograms views in symptomatic breast clinic patients justifies selective sampling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To improve breast radiographers' individual performance by using automated software to assess the correctness of breast positioning and compression in tomosynthesis screening. Materials and methods: In this retrospective longitudinal analysis of prospective cohorts, six breast radiographers with varying experience in the field were asked to use automated software to improve their performance in breast compression and positioning. The software tool automatically analyzes craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views for their positioning quality by scoring them according to PGMI classifications (perfect, good, moderate, inadequate) and checking whether the compression pressure is within the target range. The positioning and compression data from the studies acquired before the start of the project were used as individual baselines, while the data obtained after the training were used to test whether conscious use of the software could help the radiographers improve their performance. The percentage of views rated perfect or good and the percentage of views in target compression were used as overall metrics to assess changes in performance. Results: Following the use of the software, all radiographers significantly increased the percentage of images rated as perfect or good in both CCs and MLOs. Individual improvements ranged from 7 to 14% for CC and 10 to 16% for MLO views. Moreover, most radiographers exhibited improved compression performance in CCs, with improvements up to 16%. Conclusion: Active use of a software tool to automatically assess the correctness of breast compression and positioning in breast cancer screening can improve the performance of radiographers. Clinical relevance statement: This study suggests that the use of a software tool for automatically evaluating correctness of breast compression and positioning in breast cancer screening can improve the performance of radiographers on these metrics, which may ultimately lead to improved screening outcomes. Key Points: • Proper breast positioning and compression are critical in breast cancer screening to ensure accurate diagnosis. • Active use of the software increased the quality of craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique views acquired by all radiographers. • Improved performance of radiographers is expected to improve screening outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of trans-articular intramedullary fixation using cannulated headless screws for proximal phalanx fractures in the hand. Background: Various surgical techniques have been described for the fixation of proximal phalanx fractures, with Kirschner wires, plates, and screws being commonly used. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of trans-articular intramedullary fixation using cannulated headless screws for proximal phalanx fractures in the hand. Methods Eight patients, with nine proximal phalanx fractures, treated with intramedullary screw fixation, were included for a follow-up visit three years post-surgery. Subjective and objective outcome measures were assessed using the Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ), active range of motion (aROM), grip strength, conventional X-rays, and digital tomosynthesis images. Methods: Eight patients, with nine proximal phalanx fractures, treated with intramedullary screw fixation, were included for a follow-up visit three years post-surgery. Subjective and objective outcome measures were assessed using the Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ), active range of motion (aROM), grip strength, conventional X-rays, and digital tomosynthesis images. Results: We observed a mean MHQ score of 83%, a total aROM of 216.4°, and a Jamar grip strength of 29.9 kg in the injured hand. Digital tomosynthesis revealed complete fracture consolidation in all cases. Joint arthrosis was detected in only one case, attributed to a misplaced screw. Conclusions: Our findings indicate favorable long-term clinical outcomes, including range of motion, grip strength, patient satisfaction, and prevention of joint damage, with the use of intramedullary headless screw fixation. Level of evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Nephrolithiasis is a heterogeneous disease with a high prevalence and recurrence rate. Although there has been much progress regarding the surgical treatment of stones, a standardized follow-up, especially in recurrent stone formers (SFs), has yet to be decided. This fact leads to the overuse of computed tomography (CT) scans and many reoperations in patients, thus increasing their morbidity and the financial burden on the health systems. This review systematically searched the literature for original articles regarding imaging strategies and endoscopic treatment for patients with recurrent urolithiasis, aiming to identify optimal strategies to deal with these patients. Methods: We systematically searched the Medline database (accessed on 1 April 2024) for articles regarding imaging modalities and endoscopic treatment for patients with recurrent urinary tract lithiasis. Results: No specific follow-up or endoscopic treatment strategy exists for patients with recurrent urolithiasis. CT scan was the imaging modality most used in the studies, followed by X-ray, ultrasonography, and digital tomosynthesis. A transparent algorithm could not be identified. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), and ureteroscopy (URS) were used in the studies for endoscopic treatment. PCNL showed the best stone-free (SFr) rate and lowest hazard ratio (HR) for reoperation. RIRS showed superiority over extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for recurrent SFs, but fragments over 4 mm increased the recurrent rate. URS has an increased HR for reoperation for bilateral stones. Conclusions: The heterogeneity of urolithiasis leaves urologists without a standardized plan for recurrent SFs. Thus, each patient's follow-up should be planned individually and holistically. Pre-stenting is not to be avoided, especially in high-risk patients, and SFr status needs to be the aim. Finally, CT scans should not be generally overused but should be part of a patient's treatment plan. Prospective studies are required to define SFr status, the size of significant residual fragments, and the modalities of intervention and follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Key Points: Question: What are the benefits and harms of different screening mammography strategies? Findings: Six validated CISNET models found that, compared with no screening, biennial mammography screening with digital breast tomosynthesis from age 40 to 74 yielded a median of 8.2 breast cancer deaths averted per 1000 women screened, equal to a 30% reduction in breast cancer mortality, and 165 life-years gained, 1376 false-positive recalls, 201 benign biopsies, and 14 overdiagnosed cases per 1000 women screened. For each strategy, benefits were larger for Black women than for all women. Meaning: Biennial mammography from ages 40 to 74 years has favorable benefit-to-harm tradeoffs. Importance: The effects of breast cancer incidence changes and advances in screening and treatment on outcomes of different screening strategies are not well known. Objective: To estimate outcomes of various mammography screening strategies. Design, Setting, and Population: Comparison of outcomes using 6 Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) models and national data on breast cancer incidence, mammography performance, treatment effects, and other-cause mortality in US women without previous cancer diagnoses. Exposures: Thirty-six screening strategies with varying start ages (40, 45, 50 years) and stop ages (74, 79 years) with digital mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) annually, biennially, or a combination of intervals. Strategies were evaluated for all women and for Black women, assuming 100% screening adherence and "real-world" treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Estimated lifetime benefits (breast cancer deaths averted, percent reduction in breast cancer mortality, life-years gained), harms (false-positive recalls, benign biopsies, overdiagnosis), and number of mammograms per 1000 women. Results: Biennial screening with DBT starting at age 40, 45, or 50 years until age 74 years averted a median of 8.2, 7.5, or 6.7 breast cancer deaths per 1000 women screened, respectively, vs no screening. Biennial DBT screening at age 40 to 74 years (vs no screening) was associated with a 30.0% breast cancer mortality reduction, 1376 false-positive recalls, and 14 overdiagnosed cases per 1000 women screened. Digital mammography screening benefits were similar to those for DBT but had more false-positive recalls. Annual screening increased benefits but resulted in more false-positive recalls and overdiagnosed cases. Benefit-to-harm ratios of continuing screening until age 79 years were similar or superior to stopping at age 74. In all strategies, women with higher-than-average breast cancer risk, higher breast density, and lower comorbidity level experienced greater screening benefits than other groups. Annual screening of Black women from age 40 to 49 years with biennial screening thereafter reduced breast cancer mortality disparities while maintaining similar benefit-to-harm trade-offs as for all women. Conclusions: This modeling analysis suggests that biennial mammography screening starting at age 40 years reduces breast cancer mortality and increases life-years gained per mammogram. More intensive screening for women with greater risk of breast cancer diagnosis or death can maintain similar benefit-to-harm trade-offs and reduce mortality disparities. This modeling study uses Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network models and national data on breast cancer incidence, mammography performance, treatment effects, and other-cause mortality in US women without previous cancer diagnoses to estimate outcomes of various mammography screening strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Importance: Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality for US women. Trials have established that screening mammography can reduce mortality risk, but optimal screening ages, intervals, and modalities for population screening guidelines remain unclear. Objective: To review studies comparing different breast cancer screening strategies for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Data Sources: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library through August 22, 2022; literature surveillance through March 2024. Study Selection: English-language publications; randomized clinical trials and nonrandomized studies comparing screening strategies; expanded criteria for screening harms. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility and quality; data extracted from fair- and good-quality studies. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mortality, morbidity, progression to advanced cancer, interval cancers, screening harms. Results: Seven randomized clinical trials and 13 nonrandomized studies were included; 2 nonrandomized studies reported mortality outcomes. A nonrandomized trial emulation study estimated no mortality difference for screening beyond age 74 years (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.83 to 1.19]). Advanced cancer detection did not differ following annual or biennial screening intervals in a nonrandomized study. Three trials compared digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) mammography screening with digital mammography alone. With DBT, more invasive cancers were detected at the first screening round than with digital mammography, but there were no statistically significant differences in interval cancers (pooled relative risk, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.64-1.17]; 3 studies [n = 130 196]; I2 = 0%). Risk of advanced cancer (stage II or higher) at the subsequent screening round was not statistically significant for DBT vs digital mammography in the individual trials. Limited evidence from trials and nonrandomized studies suggested lower recall rates with DBT. An RCT randomizing individuals with dense breasts to invitations for supplemental screening with magnetic resonance imaging reported reduced interval cancer risk (relative risk, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.29-0.77]) and additional false-positive recalls and biopsy results with the intervention; no longer-term advanced breast cancer incidence or morbidity and mortality outcomes were available. One RCT and 1 nonrandomized study of supplemental ultrasound screening reported additional false-positives and no differences in interval cancers. Conclusions and Relevance: Evidence comparing the effectiveness of different breast cancer screening strategies is inconclusive because key studies have not yet been completed and few studies have reported the stage shift or mortality outcomes necessary to assess relative benefits. This systematic review to support a 2024 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement summarizes published evidence on the benefits and harms of screening for breast cancer in adult females. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has significantly improved the diagnosis of breast cancer due to its high sensitivity and specificity in detecting breast lesions compared to two-dimensional mammography. However, one of the primary challenges in DBT is the image blur resulting from x-ray source motion, particularly in DBT systems with a source in continuous-motion mode. This motion-induced blur can degrade the spatial resolution of DBT images, potentially affecting the visibility of subtle lesions such as microcalcifications. Approach. We addressed this issue by deriving an analytical in-plane source blur kernel for DBT images based on imaging geometry and proposing a post-processing image deblurring method with a generative diffusion model as an image prior. Main results. We showed that the source blur could be approximated by a shift-invariant kernel over the DBT slice at a given height above the detector, and we validated the accuracy of our blur kernel modeling through simulation. We also demonstrated the ability of the diffusion model to generate realistic DBT images. The proposed deblurring method successfully enhanced spatial resolution when applied to DBT images reconstructed with detector blur and correlated noise modeling. Significance. Our study demonstrated the advantages of modeling the imaging system components such as source motion blur for improving DBT image quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Significance: Achieving pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is a significant predictor of increased likelihood of survival in breast cancer patients. Early prediction of pCR is of high clinical value as it could allow personalized adjustment of treatment regimens in non-responding patients for improved outcomes. Aim: We aim to assess the association between hemoglobin-based functional imaging biomarkers derived from diffuse optical tomography (DOT) and the pathological outcome represented by pCR at different timepoints along the course of NACT. Approach: Twenty-two breast cancer patients undergoing NACT were enrolled in a multimodal DOT and X-ray digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) imaging study in which their breasts were imaged at different compression levels. Logistic regressions were used to study the associations between DOT-derived imaging markers evaluated after the first and second cycles of chemotherapy, respectively, with pCR status determined after the conclusion of NACT at the time of surgery. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was also used to explore the predictive performance of selected DOT-derived markers. Results: Normalized tumor HbT under half compression was significantly lower in the pCR group compared to the non-pCR group after two chemotherapy cycles (p = 0.042). In addition, the change in normalized tumor StO2 upon reducing compression from full to half mammographic force was identified as another potential indicator of pCR at an earlier time point, i.e., after the first chemo cycle (p = 0.038). Exploratory predictive assessments showed that AUCs using DOT-derived functional imaging markers as predictors reach as high as 0.75 and 0.71, respectively, after the first and second chemo cycle, compared to AUCs of 0.50 and 0.53 using changes in tumor size measured on DBT and MRI. Conclusions: These findings suggest that breast DOT could be used to assist response assessment in women undergoing NACT, a critical but unmet clinical need, and potentially enable personalized adjustments of treatment regimens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of using an artificial intelligence (AI) system as support for human double reading in a real-life scenario of a breast cancer screening program with digital mammography (DM) or digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Material and methods: We analyzed the performance of double reading screening with mammography and tomosynthesis after implementarion of AI as decision support. The study group consisted of a consecutive cohort of 1 year screening between March 2021 and March 2022 where double reading was performed with concurrent AI support that automatically detects and highlights lesions suspicious of breast cancer in mammography and tomosynthesis. Screening performance was measured as cancer detection rate (CDR), recall rate (RR), and positive predictive value (PPV) of recalls. Performance in the study group was compared using a McNemar test to a control group that included a screening cohort of the same size, recorded just prior to the implementation of AI. Results: A total of 11,998 women (mean age 57.59 years ± 5.8 [sd]) were included in the study group (5049 DM and 6949 DBT). Comparing global results (including DM and DBT) of double reading with vs. without AI support, we observed an increase in CDR, PPV, and RR by 3.2/‰ (5.8 vs. 9; p < 0.001), 4% (10.6 vs. 14.6; p < 0.001), and 0.7% (5.4 vs. 6.1; p < 0.001) respectively. Conclusion: AI used as support for human double reading in a real-life breast cancer screening program with DM and DBT increases CDR and PPV of the recalled women. Clinical relevance statement: Artificial intelligence as support for human double reading improves accuracy in a real-life breast cancer screening program both in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis. Key Points: • AI systems based on deep learning technology offer potential for improving breast cancer screening programs. • Using artificial intelligence as support for reading improves radiologists' performance in breast cancer screening programs with mammography or tomosynthesis. • Artificial intelligence used concurrently with human reading in clinical screening practice increases breast cancer detection rate and positive predictive value of the recalled women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To analyze discordant and false-negatives of double reading digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) versus digital mammography (DM) including reading times in the Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (OTST), and reclassify these in a retrospective reader study as missed, minimal sign, or true-negatives. Methods: The prospective OTST comparing double reading DBT vs. DM had paired design with four parallel arms: DM, DM + computer aided detection, DBT + DM, and DBT + synthetic mammography. Eight radiologists interpreted images in batches using a 5-point scale. Reading time was automatically recorded. A retrospective reader study including four radiologists classified screen-detected cancers with at least one false-negative score and screening examinations of interval cancers as negative, non-specific minimal sign, significant minimal sign, and missed; the two latter groups are defined "actionable." Statistics included chi-square, Fisher's exact, McNemar's, and Mann–Whitney U tests. Results: Discordant rate (cancer missed by one reader) for screen-detected cancers was overall comparable (DBT (31% [71/227]) and DM (30% [52/175]), p =.81), significantly lower at DBT for spiculated cancers (DBT, 19% [20/106] vs. DM, 36% [38/106], p =.003), but high (28/49 = 57%, p = 0.001) for DBT-only detected spiculated cancers. Reading time and sensitivity varied among readers. False-negative DBT-only detected spiculated cancers had shorter reading time than true-negatives in 46% (13/28). Retrospective evaluation classified the following DBT exams "actionable": three missed by both readers, 95% (39/41) of discordant cancers detected by both modes, all 30 discordant DBT-only cancers, 25% (13/51) of interval cancers. Conclusions: Discordant rate was overall comparable for DBT and DM, significantly lower at DBT for spiculated cancers, but high for DBT-only detected spiculated lesions. Most false-negative screen-detected DBT were classified as "actionable." Clinical relevance statement: Retrospective evaluation of false-negative interpretations from the Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial shows that most discordant and several interval cancers could have been detected at screening. This underlines the potential for modern AI-based reading aids and triage, as high-volume screening is a demanding task. Key Points: • Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening is more sensitive and has higher specificity compared to digital mammography screening, but high-volume DBT screening is a demanding task which can result in high discordance rate among readers. • Independent double reading DBT screening had overall comparable discordance rate as digital mammography, lower for spiculated masses seen on both modalities, and higher for small spiculated cancer seen only on DBT. • Almost all discordant digital breast tomosynthesis-detected cancers (72 of 74) and 25% (13 of 51) of the interval cancers in the Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial were retrospectively classified as actionable and could have been detected by the readers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: While digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has proven to enhance cancer detection and reduce recall rates (RR), its integration into BreastScreen Australia for screening has been limited, in part due to perceived cost implications. This study aims to assess the cost effectiveness of digital mammography (DM) compared with synthesized mammography and DBT (SM + DBT) in a first round screening context for short‐term outcomes. Methods: Clients recalled for nonspecific density (NSD) as a single lesion by both readers at the Northern Sydney Central Coast BreastScreen service in 2019 were included. Prior images were excluded to simulate first‐round screening. Eleven radiologists read DM and synthesized mammography with DBT (SM + DBT) images 4 weeks apart. Recall rates (RR), reading time, and diagnostic parameters were measured, and costs for screen reading and assessment were calculated. Result: Among 65 clients studied, 13 were diagnosed with cancer, with concordant cancer recalls. SM + DBT reduced recall rates (RR), increased reading time, maintained cancer detection sensitivity, and significantly improved other diagnostic parameters, particularly false positive rates. Benign biopsy recalls remained equivalent. While SM + DBT screen reading cost was significantly higher than DM (DM AU$890 ± 186 vs SM + DBT AU$1279 ± 265; P < 0.001), the assessment cost (DM AU$29,504 ± 9427 vs SM + DBT AU$18,021 ± 5606; P < 0.001), and combined screen reading and assessment costs were significantly lower (DM AU$30,394 ± 9508 vs SM + DBT AU$19,300 ± 5721; P = 0.001). SM + DBT screen reading and assessment of 65 patients resulted in noteworthy cost savings (AU$11,094), equivalent to assessing 12 additional clients. Conclusion: In first round screening, DBT yields significant cost savings by effectively reducing unnecessary recalls to assessment while maintaining diagnostic efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to demonstrate the performance characteristics and potential utility of a novel tomosynthesis device as applied to imaging the chest, specifically relating to lung nodules. The imaging characteristics and quality of a novel digital tomosynthesis prototype system was assessed by scanning, a healthy volunteer, and an andromorphic lung phantom with different configurations of simulated pulmonary nodules. The adequacy of nodule detection on the phantoms was rated by chest radiologists using a standardized scale. Results from using this tomosynthesis device demonstrate in plane resolution of 16lp/cm, with estimated effective radiation doses of 90% less than low dose CT. Nodule detection was adequate across various anatomic locations on a phantom. These proof-of-concept tests showed this novel tomosynthesis device can detect lung nodules with low radiation dose to the patient. This technique has potential as an alternative to low dose chest CT for lung nodule screening and tracking. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) may improve sensitivity in population screening. However, evidence is currently limited on the performance of DBT in patients at a higher risk of breast cancer. This systematic review compares the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of DBT, digital mammography (DM), and ultrasound, for breast cancer detection in women with dense breasts and additional risk factors. Methods: Medline, Embase, and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews via OvidSP were searched to identify literature from 2010 to August 21, 2023. Selection of studies, data extraction, and quality assessment (using QUADAS-2 and CHEERS) were completed in duplicate. Findings were summarised descriptively and narratively. Results: Twenty-six studies met pre-specified inclusion criteria. In women with breast symptoms or recalled for investigation of screen-detected findings (19 studies), DBT may be more accurate than DM. For example, in symptomatic women, the sensitivity of DBT + DM ranged from 82.8 % to 92.5 % versus 56.8 %–81.3 % for mammography (DM/synthesised images). However, most studies had a high risk of bias due to participant selection. Evidence regarding DBT in women with a personal or family history of breast cancer, for DBT versus ultrasound alone, and cost-effectiveness of DBT was limited. Conclusions: In women with dense breasts and additional risk factors for breast cancer, evidence is limited about the accuracy of DBT compared to other imaging modalities, particularly in those with personal or family history of breast cancer. Future research in this population should consider head-to-head comparisons of imaging modalities to determine the relative effectiveness of these imaging tests. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration number CRD42021236470.

Abstract Background Breast cancer survivors who underwent breast conserving therapy (BCT) are still 10% more likely to develop a second breast cancer at follow-up, Digital mammography (DM) was advised in every practical guideline for follow-up after BCT; however, it was difficult to distinguish between actual recurrence and scar development at DM. Our research objective is to assess the value of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) on the final Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon (BI-RADS) assessment categories compared to diagnostic digital mammography (DM) of breast cancer patients treated with breast conservation therapy (BCT), and to determine the additive value of DBT to DM or the use of DBT with synthetic 2D images in the diagnostic workup following BCT. Results Four hundred and seventeen breast cancer patients who underwent breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and received diagnostic assessments, including digital mammography (DM), digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), and reconstructed synthetic 2D images, were enrolled in the study. There is a significant reduction in the proportion of studies classified as probably benign BI-RADS 3 in synthetic 2D + DBT and DM + DBT compared with those in DM alone, and this was demonstrated by the two readers and at double reading (all P = 0.01). There is a significant increase in the PPV of malignancy in synthetic 2D + DBT and DM + DBT compared with those in DM alone for reader 2 (P = 0.01) and at double reading (P 0.3). Regarding the mammographic abnormalities, we noted a significant reduction in asymmetry and a significant increase in architectural distortion in synthetic 2D + DBT and DM + DBT compared with those in DM alone, and this was demonstrated by the two readers and at double reading (all P = 0.01). Conclusions The addition of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) into the diagnostic process after breast-conserving therapy (BCT), either in conjunction with digital mammography (DM) or with synthetic 2D images in the diagnostic workup following BCT, significantly decreases the proportion of studies classified as probably benign, significantly increases the rate of studies classified as normal or benign, and significantly increase in the positive predictive value (PPV) of malignancy without significant difference in the patients classified as BI-RADS category 4 or 5. Moreover it improved diagnostic confidence in biopsy recommendations, regardless of mammographic density.

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of supplemental 3D automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) in the diagnostic work-up of BI-RADS 0 recalls. We hypothesized that 3D ABUS may reduce the benign biopsy rate. Materials and methods: In this prospective multicenter diagnostic study, screening participants recalled after a BI-RADS 0 result underwent bilateral 3D ABUS supplemental to usual care: digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and targeted hand-held ultrasound (HHUS). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 3D ABUS, and DBT plus HHUS, were calculated. New 3D ABUS findings and changes of management (biopsy or additional imaging) were recorded. Results: A total of 501 women (median age 55 years, IQR [51–64]) with 525 BI-RADS 0 lesions were included between April 2018 and March 2020. Cancer was diagnosed in 45 patients. 3D ABUS sensitivity was 72.1% (95% CI [57.2–83.4%]), specificity 84.4% (95% CI [80.8–87.4%]), PPV 29.2% (95% CI [21.4–38.5%]), and NPV 97.1% 95.0–98.4%). Sensitivity of DBT plus HHUS was 100% (95% CI [90.2–100%]), specificity 71.4% (95% CI [67.2–75.2%]), PPV 23.8% (95% CI [18.1–30.5%]) and NPV 100% (95% CI [98.7–100%]). Twelve out of 43 (27.9%) malignancies in BI-RADS 0 lesions were missed on 3D ABUS, despite being detected on DBT and/or HHUS. Supplemental 3D ABUS resulted in the detection of 57 new lesions and six extra biopsy procedures, all were benign. Conclusion: 3D ABUS in the diagnostic work-up of BI-RADS 0 recalls may miss over a quarter of cancers detected with HHUS and/or DBT and should not be used to omit biopsy. Supplemental 3D ABUS increases the benign biopsy rate. Trial registration: Dutch Trial Register, available via https://www.onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/29659 Critical relevance statement: Supplemental 3D automated breast ultrasound in the work-up of BI-RADS 0 recalls may miss over a quarter of cancers detected with other methods and should not be used to omit biopsy; ABUS findings did increase benign biopsy rate. Key Points: Automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) may miss over 25% of cancers detectable by alternative methods. Don't rely solely on 3D ABUS to assess indication for biopsy. New findings with supplemental 3D ABUS increase the benign biopsy rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The assessment information of tumor margins is extremely important for the success of the breast cancer surgery and whether the patient undergoes a second operation. However, conducting surgical margin assessments is a time-consuming task that requires pathology-related skills and equipment, and often cannot be provided in a timely manner. To address this challenge, digital breast tomosynthesis technology was utilized to generate detailed cross-sectional images of the breast tissue and integrate deep learning algorithms for image segmentation, achieving an assessment of tumor margins during surgery. Methods: this study utilized post-operative tissue samples from 46 patients who underwent breast-conserving treatment, and generated image sets using digital breast tomosynthesis for the training and evaluation of deep learning models. Results: Deep learning algorithms effectively identifying the tumor area. They achieved a Mean Intersection over Union (MIoU) of 0.91, global accuracy of 99%, weighted IoU of 44%, precision of 98%, recall of 83%, F1 score of 89%, and dice coefficient of 93% on the training dataset; for the testing dataset, MIoU was at 83%, global accuracy at 97%, weighted IoU at 38%, precision at 87%, recall rate at 69%, F1 score at 76%, dice coefficient at 86%. Conclusions: The initial evaluation suggests that the deep learning-based image segmentation method is highly accurate in measuring breast tumor margins. This helps provide information related to tumor margins during surgery, and by using different datasets, this research method can also be applied to the surgical margin assessment of various types of tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Digital tomosynthesis (DT) has emerged as a potential imaging modality for evaluating anatomic structures in veterinary medicine. This study aims to validate the diagnostic yield of DT in identifying predefined anatomic structures in feline cadaver heads, comparing it with conventional intraoral dental radiography (DR). Methods: A total of 16 feline cadaver heads were utilized to evaluate 19 predefined clinically relevant anatomic structures using both DR and DT. A semi-quantitative scoring system was employed to characterize the ability of each imaging method to identify these structures. Results: DT demonstrated a significantly higher diagnostic yield compared to DR for all evaluated anatomic structures. Orthogonal DT imaging identified 13 additional anatomic landmarks compared to a standard 10-view feline set obtained via DR. Moreover, DT achieved statistically significant higher scores for each of these landmarks, indicating improved visualization over DR. Discussion: These findings validate the utility of DT technology in reliably identifying clinically relevant anatomic structures in the cat skull. This validation serves as a foundation for further exploration of DT imaging in detecting dentoalveolar and other maxillofacial bony lesions and pathologies in cats. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the reproducibility of vertical subluxation (VS) parameters using X-ray, computed tomography (CT), and tomosynthesis (TS) while comparing the head-loading effects. Methods: The VS parameters of 26 patients (retrospective review) were evaluated. Using the intra-class correlation coefficient, we statistically examined the intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities of the parameters. Head-loaded and -unloaded imagings were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: The intra-rater reliability of TS and CT showed intra-class correlation coefficients of ≥0.8 (X-ray range: 0.6–0.8), with similar results for the inter-rater reliabilities. Furthermore, in head-loading imaging, the TS had significantly higher VS scores than that of CT (P < .05). Conclusions: In comparison with the X-ray, TS and CT were more accurate and reproducible. In terms of head loading, the VS values for TS were worse than those for CT, indicating that TS was more effective than CT in diagnosing VS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Breast cancer (BC) is the most commonly diagnosed non‐skin cancer in women. To achieve early and accurate diagnosis, three‐dimensional (3D) cone‐beam breast computed tomography (CBBCT) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) modalities are used. Importantly, the comparison of reconstruction accuracy of both CBBCT and DBT has rarely been investigated, thus constituting a research gap. This study systematically investigated the performances of the CBBCT and DBT for different reconstruction algorithms using both BR3D breast phantom and breast images. We acquired clinical breast images and scanned the BR3D phantom for additional breast images. These acquired images were used to simulate projection data using predefined CBBCT and DBT geometries. The simulated projections were reconstructed using five different reconstruction algorithms. To evaluate the reconstruction accuracy, we calculated average image quality assessment (IQA) indices, including peak signal‐to‐noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), root mean square error (RMSE), and others, across different algorithms and modalities. The pooled PSNR, SSIM, and RMSE for DBT and CBBCT images are (31.6265 ± 0.8725), (0.9353 ± 0.0077), and (0.0270 ± 0.0025) and (29.7007 ± 0.9249), (0.9136 ± 0.0130), and (0.0342 ± 0.0040), which implies that the overall IQA indices of DBT are superior to CBBCT; therefore, DBT tends to reveal more BC detectability as the diagnosis outcome would largely depend on good quality images. The results show that DBT gives an improved result for all algorithms compared to CBBCT, although further experimental trials may be needed to establish the findings fully. The findings suggest that using DBT may enhance the accuracy of BC diagnosis compared to CBBCT due to its superior image quality in clinical practice, emphasizing the importance of selecting optimal reconstruction algorithms for improved diagnostic outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Portable chest radiography is a valuable tool in the intensive care unit. However, the supine position causes superposition of anatomical structures resulting in less reliable detection of certain abnormalities. Recently, a portable digital tomosynthesis (pDTS) prototype with a modified motorized x-ray device was developed. We aimed to compare the diagnostic value of pDTS to standard bedside chest radiography in the diagnosis of a posterior pneumothorax. A modified motorized x-ray device was developed to perform 15 radiographic projections while translating the x-ray tube 25 cm (10 cm ramp up and 15 cm during x-ray exposure) with a total radiation dose of 0.54 mSv. This new technique of pDTS was performed in addition to standard bedside chest x-ray in a patient with a confirmed posterior hydropneumothorax. The images were compared with the standard bedside chest x-ray and computed tomography (CT) images by two experienced radiologists. The posterior hydropneumothorax previously identified with CT was visible on tomosynthesis images but not with standard bedside imaging. Combining the digital tomosynthesis technique with the portable x-ray machine could increase the diagnostic value of bedside chest radiography for the diagnosis of posterior pneumothoraces while avoiding intrahospital transport and limiting radiation exposure compared to CT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Angled bony-increased offset and metal-augmented baseplate have recently been used to achieve neutral to inferior inclination of the glenoid implant. Nonetheless, bone incorporation is difficult to evaluate using computed tomography or other conventional methods owing to the presence of metal artifacts; therefore, whether bone incorporation between the grafted bone and glenoid or between the graft and baseplate implant can be achieved remains unclear. Several studies have reported the effectiveness of tomosynthesis in reducing metal artifacts for the evaluation of implant loosening, bone resorption, and spot welds. We aimed to evaluate and compare the bone incorporation rates between angled bony-increased offset and metal-augmented implants using tomosynthesis with metal artifact reduction technology. We hypothesized that a high bone incorporation rate would be obtained with angled bony-increased offset and a metal-augmented baseplate. A total of 52 patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) with angled bony-increased offset and 42 patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with metal-augmented baseplate were assessed and followed up for a minimum of 2 years. The bone incorporation and implant loosening rates were compared between the 2 groups, and the sites of spot welds and trabeculation were recorded according to zones. Bone incorporation between the bone and prosthesis was defined as a confirmation of spot welds connecting the porous area and bone in more than three zones. Bone incorporation between the native bone and grafted bone was defined as an observation of trabeculation. Glenoid loosening was defined as the presence of at least 1 mm radiolucency around the prosthesis in more than 2 zones. Both the angled bony-increased offset and metal-augmented baseplate groups achieved sufficient bone incorporation rates (98% [51/52 cases] vs. 100% [42/42 cases], P = 1.0) and low implant loosening rates (2% [1/52 cases] vs. 0% [0/42 cases], P = 1.0). Spot welds and trabeculation were likely to be confirmed in the lower parts of the glenoid. The two groups did not show any significant differences regarding bone incorporation rates. Considering the complexity of performing the procedure with angled bony-increased offset, the use of a metal-augmented baseplate can serve as an alternative treatment to avoid superior inclination in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]