Search

Background Double-layer stents show promising results in preventing periinterventional and postinterventional embolic events in elective settings of carotid artery stenting (CAS). We report a single-center experience with the CGuard stent in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to symptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis or occlusion with or without intracranial occlusion. Methods We retrospectively analyzed all patients who received a CGuard stent in the setting of AIS at our institution. Neuroimaging and clinical data were analyzed with the following primary endpoints: technical feasibility, acute and delayed stent occlusion or thrombosis, distal embolism, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and functional outcome at 3 months. Results In 33 patients, stenting with the CGuard was performed. Stent deployment was successful in all patients (28 with tandem occlusions, 5 with isolated ICA occlusion). Transient acute in-stent thrombus formation occurred in three patients (9%) without early stent occlusion. Delayed, asymptomatic stent occlusion was seen in 1 patient (3%) after 49 days. Asymptomatic periinterventional distal emboli occurred in 2 patients (6%), 1 patient experienced a transient ischemic attack 79 days after the procedure and 1 patient (3%) developed sICH. Favorable clinical outcome (mRS 0–2) at 3 months was achieved in 12 patients (36%) and the mortality rate was 24%. Conclusion The CGuard use in emergencies was technically feasible, the safety has to be confirmed by further multicentric studies.

Background: After successful reperfusion is achieved (extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) ≥2b50), decision on pursuing additional treatment strategies in order to achieve complete reperfusion (eTICI=2c/3), is multifactorial and depends on patient’s clinical and imaging characteristics. We have developed and validated a clinical decision tool to provide individualized predictions on achieving delayed reperfusion based on individual patient data. Methods: Single-center registry analysis for all consecutive patients admitted between 02/2015 - 12/2020. Primary variable of interest was perfusion imaging outcome in patients with incomplete reperfusion (eTICI 2a-2c), evaluated on the 24-hour follow-up imaging. This variable was dichotomized into delayed reperfusion, in case of non-observable perfusion deficit, and persistent perfusion deficit, in case of perfusion deficit captured on the final angiography imaging. Final model variable selection was performed via bootstrapped (n=200) stepwise backwards regression. Model was split into a training and testing set (80:20 ratio), with 10-fold cross validation resampling. Results: 372 patients (50.8% female, mean age 74) were included, with 228 (61.2%) of them having delayed reperfusion. Final model identified seven variables of importance including: age, sex, atrial fibrillation, Intervention-to-Follow-Up time, maneuver count, eTICI and collateral status. Model’s discriminative ability for predicting delayed reperfusion was adequate (AUC 0.83, 95% CI 0.74 -0.92), with an overall adjusted calibration (Brier score 0.17, 95% CI 0.15-0.18). Conclusions: Current model presents a tool that may aid clinical decision-making process in selection of patients for pursuing additional treatment strategies after incomplete reperfusion has been achieved. This is an important next step towards personalized treatment of stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy.

Background: There is paucity of data regarding the effects of delayed reperfusion (DR) on clinical outcomes in patients with incomplete reperfusion following mechanical thrombectomy. We hypothesized that DR has a strong association with clinical outcome in patients with incomplete reperfusion after mechanical thrombectomy (expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction, 2a–2c). Methods: Single-institution’s stroke registry retrospective analysis of patients admitted from February 2015 to December 2020. DR was defined as the absence of any perfusion delay on ≈24-hour contrast-enhanced follow-up perfusion imaging, whereas persistent perfusion deficit denotes a perfusion delay corresponding to the catheter angiographic deficit directly after the intervention. The association of perfusion outcome (DR versus persistent perfusion deficit) with the occurrence of new infarcts and 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0–2) was evaluated using logistic regression analyses. Comparison of predictive accuracy was evaluated by calculating area under the curve for models with and without perfusion outcome. Results: In 566 patients (mean age 74, 49.6% female), new infarcts in the incomplete reperfusion areas were less common in DR versus persistent perfusion deficit patients (small punctiform: 17.1% versus 25%, large confluent: 7.9% versus 63.2%; P =0.001). After adjustment for confounders, DR was a strong predictor of functional independence (adjusted odds ratio, 2.37 [95% CI 1.34–4.23]). There was a significant improvement in predictive accuracy of functional independence when perfusion outcome was added to expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction alone (area under the curve 0.57 versus 0.62, P =0.01). Conclusions: Occurrence of DR is closely associated with tissue outcome and functional independence. DR may be an independent prognostic parameter, suggesting it as a potential outcome surrogate for medical rescue therapies.