Search

Despite an equal willingness to participate in clinical trials, there is evidence that several minority populations are systematically under-represented in studies. One potential cause and frequently used exclusionary criterion in orthopedic trials is patients with active workman's compensation (WC) insurance claims. The purpose of this study is to determine demographic differences in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with commercial and government insurance vs workers compensation claims. This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at a single institution in the northeastern United States from 2018 to 2019. Patients undergoing revision cases were excluded. Chart review was used to extract demographic data such as age, gender, insurance, and reported race. A total of 4553 patient records were reviewed and included. There were 742 WC patients and 3811 non-WC patients. Two hundred and forty-four patients did not report their race. Overall, WC patients differed from non-WC with respect to race (P < 0.001). One hundred and eleven (15.0%) of WC and 293 (7.7%) non-WC patients reported being 'Black' or 'African American' (P = 0.002). This compares to 368 (49.6%) WC and 2788 (73.2%) non-WC patients who reported 'White' (P < 0.001). About 16.8% of WC patients were identified as 'Hispanic or Latino,' compared to 5.2% of non-WC (P < 0.001). African American and Hispanic/Latino patients are over-represented in workman's compensation patient populations relative to non-workman's compensation. Conversely, white patients are over-represented in non-WC patient populations, which serve as the basis for the majority of clinical study populations. Excluding workman's compensation patients from clinical trials may lead to an underrepresentation of African American and Hispanic/Latino patient populations in orthopedic clinical trials. In doing so, the generalizability of the results of rotator cuff repair clinical outcomes research to all races and ethnicities may be compromised. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Little research has been done to compare resilience, as measured by the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), across common sports medicine patient populations. Our purpose was to investigate resilience levels across sports medicine patient populations. All patients who underwent reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACLR), partial meniscectomy (PM), meniscal repair (MR), rotator cuff repair (RCR), or shoulder stabilization (SS) between January 1 and June 30, 2020, were screened for inclusion. At our institution, BRS scores are routinely collected during the preoperative period. Patients with preoperative BRS scores available were included for analysis. Patients who were eligible on the basis of ACLR who underwent concomitant PM or MR were included in the ACL group. A total of 655 patients with a median age of 49 years were included in analysis. The median preoperative resilience score across all patients was 3.83 (interquartile range, 3.50–4.17), and the highest scores were seen in the ACLR group (median, 4.00; interquartile range, 3.67–4.17). On multivariate regression, scores were significantly and independently lower in the PM and RCR groups. Male patients were found to have significantly higher scores than female patients overall (P=.028), but in subgroup analysis by pathology, this effect was only seen in the SS and PM groups. Psychological factors are important to consider when surgically treating patients, and resilience specifically may play a role in predicting treatment success. Patients undergoing PM and RCR tend to report lower resilience scores than patients undergoing ACLR at preoperative baseline. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(2):95–100.] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Osteochondritis dissecans can result in significant limitations in activity, pain, and early osteoarthritis. There are various treatment modalities to address these defects. The purpose of this study was to provide a qualitative summary of the various treatment options for unstable osteochondritis dissecans in the knee. A literature search was performed on osteochondritis dissecans in the knee using PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases. The search was completed using a combination of the following terms: 'osteochondritis dissecans,' 'OCD,' 'osteochondral,' 'articular cartilage,' 'repair,' 'surgery,' 'treatment,' 'osteochondral allograft,' 'autologous chondrocyte implantation,' 'unstable,' 'knee,' 'clinical studies.' A total of 682 studies were found, of which 24 were included in the qualitative analysis. The quality score ranged from 46 to 80, and the mean follow-up ranged from 2 to 17 years. The most common surgical procedures were internal fixation (n = 7 studies), ACI (n = 6), fragment excision (n = 3), MACI (n = 2), bone graft + ACI (n = 2), OCA (n = 2), mosaicplasty/OAT (n = 2), and scaffold (n = 2). Overall, the reported outcome measures were heterogeneous in nature. Post-operative International Knee Documentations Committee (IKDC) scores ranged from 75 to 85 and Lysholm scores ranged from 70 to 93.5. Tegner scores ranged from 4 to 5. Rates of failure, complication, and revision were highly variable across studies and surgical techniques. There are a variety of surgical options for the treatment of unstable osteochondritis dissecans. In skeletally immature patients, internal fixation demonstrated acceptable rates of radiographic union and patient reported outcome measures. In skeletally mature patients with large lesions, MACI and OCA transplantation provided similar patient reported outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]