1. The effect of endorectal balloon on anorectal dose during postoperative volumetric arc radiotherapy of prostate cancer
- Author
-
Urs Rusch, Tino Streller, Oliver Riesterer, Susanne Oertel, Ira Minneken, Yousef Najafi, Maria D. Herraiz Lablanca, Binaya Shrestha, University of Zurich, and Riesterer, Oliver
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_treatment ,2720 Hematology ,Anal Canal ,610 Medicine & health ,Dose constraints ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,03 medical and health sciences ,Prostate cancer ,0302 clinical medicine ,Endorectal balloon ,Prostate ,Humans ,2741 Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging ,Medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Prospective Studies ,Post prostatectomy ,Male Genitals ,business.industry ,Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted ,Rectum ,Prostatic Neoplasms ,Radiotherapy Dosage ,Hematology ,medicine.disease ,10044 Clinic for Radiation Oncology ,Radiation therapy ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Oncology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Salvage radiotherapy ,2730 Oncology ,Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated ,business ,Nuclear medicine - Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the impact of endorectal balloon (ERB) on anorectal dose during postoperative VMAT of prostate cancer. Methods In ten patients referred for salvage radiotherapy CTs were obtained without ERB and with air-filled ERB of 50ml and 100ml. CTs were repeated weekly (4–6 control CTs) and registered to the respective planning CT. For each planning CT, a VMAT plan was made with defined anorectal dose constraints and propagated on the respective control CTs. The dose volumes V40Gy, V60Gy and V65Gy of the rectal and anal wall (Rwall and Awall, respectively) and the ERB position were obtained from each plan. Results In plans with ERB, the mean Rwall dose volumes V40Gy, V60Gy and V65Gy were higher by 8%, 5% and 2% (ERB 50ml) and 2%, 3% and 3% (ERB 100ml) in comparison to plans without ERB. The respective Awall dose volume differences were 2%, 0%, −1% (ERB 50ml), and −3%, −2%, −2% (ERB 100ml). The dose volume variability of the Rwall was comparable with and without ERB, but was slightly reduced by ERB for the Awall. The mean ERB position variability was >2mm in anterior–posterior and inferior–superior directions. Conclusion The use of ERB during post-operative VMAT has no advantages for anorectal dose.
- Published
- 2017