Search

The reproductive hormone, estrogen, contributes to the development of breast cancer by binding to the estrogen receptor (ER) in the nucleus, triggering cell growth and tumor promotion. In addition to its role in regulating target genes and signaling pathways involved in cell cycle progression, the ER-signaling pathway may regulate the expression of chromatin-remodeling gene, Metastasis-associated 3 (MTA3), or interact with chromatin-remodeling protein, Metastasis-associated 1 (MTA1). The invasion-suppressor gene, E-Cadherin (E-Cad), has recently been identified as a downstream target gene regulated by the ER-MTA3 pathway via the transcriptional repressor, Snail, and the ER-MTA3-Snail-E-Cad pathway has therefore been evoked to explain the clinical observation that ER expression in breast cancer is generally associated with a better clinical outcome. Since E-Cad may play an initiating role during breast tumorigenesis, we hypothesized that this ER-signaling pathway may also determine susceptibility to breast cancer, and examined this in a multigenic case–control study of 468 incident breast cancer patients and 470 healthy controls by genotyping the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in five genes (ER, MTA3, Snail, E-Cad, and MTA1) in the ER-signaling pathways. Support for this hypothesis came from the observations that (a)␣with the exception of Snail, which interacted differently with reproductive risk factors in relation to breast cancer risk, there was a joint effect of the SNPs of these genes and estrogen-related risk factors (age at first full-term pregnancy and obesity, measured by the body mass index) on breast cancer risk (p < 0.05); (b) a trend toward increased risk of developing breast cancer was seen in women harboring a greater number of putative high-risk genotypes of these genes in ER-signaling pathways; (c) this association between risk and the number of putative high-risk genotypes was stronger and more significant in women thought to have experienced higher estrogen level, i.e., obese women; and (d) the risk effect conferred by obesity was only significant in women with a higher number of putative high-risk genotypes of the ER-signaling genes. These epidemiological findings highlight the role of newly identified novel ER-related pathways in breast cancer development and provide a more comprehensive picture of the tumorigenic effect of estrogen in breast cancer development.

A tumorigenic role of the nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) has been suggested by the finding of a significant association between increased breast cancer risk and a cooperative effect of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in NHEJ genes. However, the lack of an association between hereditary breast cancer and defective NHEJ genes prevents conclusions from being drawn about a link between NHEJ and breast cancer development. Recently, BRCA1-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts were found to have significantly reduced NHEJ activity, suggesting an accessory role of BRCA1 in NHEJ. The present study was performed to confirm this observation in human breast cancer cell lines and to examine whether the interaction between BRCA1 and NHEJ was of tumorigenic significance. Support for this hypothesis came from the findings that (a) a case-control study (469 breast cancer patients and 740 healthy controls) showed that the breast cancer risk associated with high-risk genotypes of NHEJ genes was significantly modified by the BRCA1 genotype. A significant increase in the cancer risk associated either with harboring one additional putative high-risk NHEJ genotype or with the joint effect of having reproductive risk factors (reflected by an interval of ≥12 years between menarche and first full-term pregnancy) and a higher number of high-risk genotypes of the NHEJ genes was only seen in women with at least one variant BRCA1 allele (i.e., the Glu/Gly or Gly/Gly forms of BRCA1 Glu1038Gly); and (b) a phenotype-based study measuring in vitro and in vivo NHEJ capacity showed that the precise end-joining capacity was different in breast cancer cell lines with different BRCA1 statuses being higher in BRCA1-expressing MCF-7 cells than in HCC1937 cells (defective BRCA1 expression). Furthermore, this end-joining capacity was decreased in MCF-7 cells in which BRCA1 expression was blocked using small interfering RNA and increased in HCC1937 transfected with full-length BRCA1. Because BRCA1 is a well-documented breast cancer susceptibility gene, this association between NHEJ and BRCA1 not only suggests a role of BRCA1 in NHEJ but also provides essential support for the tumorigenic contribution of NHEJ in breast cancer development.

The role of the familial breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, in the homologous recombination pathway for DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair suggests that the mechanisms involved in DNA DSB repair are of particular etiological importance during breast tumorigenesis. However, there is currently no evidence for an association between breast cancer and the other DSB repair pathway, the nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway. It is possible that, because this DNA repair pathway is so crucial for mammalian cells to maintain genomic stability, any severe defects in it would result in serious outcomes, such as genomic instability and cell death, and block subsequent cell outgrowth and tumor formation. Thus, only subtle defects arising from low-penetrance alleles would escape lethality accumulating essential genetic changes and be associated with cancer formation, and the tumorigenic contribution of these alleles would become more obvious if individual putative high-risk genotypes of each NHEJ gene act jointly. Furthermore, this joint effect might be modified by specific environmental factors, and we hypothesized that estrogen exposure might be one such factor because estrogen is suggested to cause DNA DSBs, triggering breast tumorigenesis. Because single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the most subtle genetic variation in the genome, to examine these hypotheses, we have genotyped 30 SNPs in all five NHEJ genes (Ku70, Ku80, DNA-PKcs, Ligase IV, and XRCC4) in 254 primary breast cancer patients and 379 healthy controls. Support for these hypotheses came from the observations that (a) two SNPs in Ku70 and XRCC4 were associated with breast cancer risk (P0.05); (b) a trend toward increased risk of developing breast cancer was found in women harboring a greater number of putative high-risk genotypes of NHEJ genes (an adjusted odds ratio of 1.46 for having one additional putative high-risk genotype; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-1.80); (c) this association between risk and the number of putative high-risk genotypes was stronger and more significant in women thought to be more susceptible to estrogen, i.e., those with no history of full-term pregnancy; and (d) the protective effect conferred by a history of full-term pregnancy was only significant in women with a lower number of putative high-risk genotypes of NHEJ genes. Based on comprehensive NHEJ gene profiles, this study provides new insights to suggest the role of the NHEJ pathway in breast cancer development and supports the possibility that breast cancer is initiated by estrogen exposure, which causes DNA DSBs.