Search

Background: The utilization of three-dimensional printing has grown rapidly within the field of surgery over recent years. Within the subspecialty of colorectal surgery, the technology has been used to create personalized anatomical models for preoperative planning, models for surgical training, and occasionally customized implantable devices and surgical instruments. We aim to provide a systematic review of the current literature discussing clinical applications of three-dimensional printing in colorectal surgery., Methods: Full-text studies published in English which described the application of 3D printing in pre-surgical planning, advanced surgical planning, and patient education within the field of colorectal surgery were included. Exclusion criteria were duplicate articles, review papers, studies exclusively dealing with surgical training and/or education, studies which used only virtual models, and studies which described colorectal cancer only as it pertained to other organs., Results: Eighteen studies were included in this review. There were two randomized controlled trials, one retrospective outcomes study, five case reports/series, one animal model, and nine technical notes/feasibility studies. There were three studies on advanced surgical planning/device manufacturing, six on pre-surgical planning, two on pelvic anatomy modeling, eight on various types of anatomy modeling, and one on patient education., Conclusions: While more studies with a higher level of evidence are needed, the findings of this review suggest many promising applications of three-dimensional printing within the field of colorectal surgery with the potential to improve patient outcomes and experiences., (© 2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

Eighteen mongrel dogs underwent handsewn right segmental colectomy. One group was pretreated with methylprednisolone 30 mg/kg intravenously at the time of surgery and 7.5 mg/kg intravenously at 6-hour intervals for 24 hours; the second group served as a saline control. Motility was measured postoperatively by manometric catheters, and propulsion was measured by x-ray evidence of passage of radiopaque markers. Marker studies showed more rapid passage in animals pretreated with steroids, but differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.11). Motility studies showed a significant overall increase in motility in steroid-treated animals on the first postoperative day (P = 0.03); smaller differences on the second or third days were not significant. Motility studies comparing ileum, cecum, and sigmoid showed the ileum to be the site of significant steroid effect (P = 0.02), with insignificant benefit seen in the colon. The data suggest that methylprednisolone may be of some objective benefit in restoration of postoperative bowel motility, and the site of action may be in the small bowel and not at the anastomosis.