Search

Interest in using bedside C-reactive protein (CRP) and ferritin levels to identify patients with hyperinflammatory sepsis who might benefit from anti-inflammatory therapies has piqued with the COVID-19 pandemic experience. Our first objective was to identify patterns in CRP and ferritin trajectory among critically ill pediatric sepsis patients. We then examined the association between these different groups of patients in their inflammatory cytokine responses, systemic inflammation, and mortality risks.A prospective, observational cohort study.Children with sepsis and organ failure in nine pediatric intensive care units in the United States.Two hundred and fifty-five children were enrolled. Five distinct clinical multi-trajectory groups were identified. Plasma CRP (mg/dL), ferritin (ng/mL), and 31 cytokine levels were measured at two timepoints during sepsis (median Day 2 and Day 5). Group-based multi-trajectory models (GBMTM) identified groups of children with distinct patterns of CRP and ferritin.Group 1 had normal CRP and ferritin levels ( n = 8; 0% mortality); Group 2 had high CRP levels that became normal, with normal ferritin levels throughout ( n = 80; 5% mortality); Group 3 had high ferritin levels alone ( n = 16; 6% mortality); Group 4 had very high CRP levels, and high ferritin levels ( n = 121; 11% mortality); and Group 5 had very high CRP and very high ferritin levels ( n = 30; 40% mortality). Cytokine responses differed across the five groups, with ferritin levels correlated with macrophage inflammatory protein 1α levels and CRP levels reflective of many cytokines.Bedside CRP and ferritin levels can be used together to distinguish groups of children with sepsis who have different systemic inflammation cytokine responses and mortality risks. These data suggest future potential value in personalized clinical trials with specific targets for anti-inflammatory therapies.

ObjectiveThrombotic microangiopathy induced Thrombocytopenia Associated Multiple Organ Failure and hyperinflammatory Macrophage Activation Syndrome are important causes of late pediatric sepsis mortality that are often missed or have delayed diagnosis. Our objective is to derive computable 24-hour sepsis phenotypes to facilitate enrollment in early precise anti-inflammatory trials targeting mortality from these conditions.DesignMachine learning analysis using consensus k-means clustering.SettingNine pediatric intensive care units.Patients404 children with severe sepsis.Interventions24-hour computable phenotypes derived using 25 bedside variables including C-reactive protein and ferritin.Measurements and Main ResultsFour computable phenotypes (PedSep-A, B, C, and D) are derived. Compared to the overall population mean, PedSep-A has the least inflammation (median C-reactive protein 7.3 mg/dL, ferritin 125 ng/mL), younger age, less chronic illness, and more respiratory failure (n = 135; 2% mortality); PedSep-B (median C-reactive protein 13.2 mg/dL, ferritin 225 ng/ mL) has organ failure with intubated respiratory failure, shock, and Glasgow Coma Scale score < 7 (n = 102, 12% mortality); PedSep-C (median C-reactive protein 15.2 mg/dL, ferritin 405 ng/mL) has elevated ferritin, lymphopenia, more shock, more hepatic failure and less respiratory failure (n = 110; mortality 10%); and, PedSep D (median C-reactive protein 13.1 mg/dL ferritin 610 ng/mL), has hyperferritinemic, thrombocytopenic multiple organ failure with more cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatic, renal, hematologic, and neurologic system failures (n = 56, 34% mortality). PedSep-D has highest likelihood of Thrombocytopenia Associated Multiple Organ Failure (Adj OR 47.51 95% CI [18.83-136.83], p < 0.0001) and Macrophage Activation Syndrome (Adj OR 38.63 95% CI [13.26-137.75], p CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEMachine learning identifies four computable phenotypes (www.pedsepsis.pitt.edu). Membership in PedSep-D appears optimal for enrollment in early anti-inflammatory trials targeting Thrombocytopenia Associated Multiple Organ Failure and Macrophage Activation Syndrome.Author’s CommentQuestionCan machine learning methods derive 24-hour computable pediatric sepsis phenotypes that facilitate early identification of patients for enrollment in precise anti-inflammatory therapy trials?FindingsFour distinct phenotypes (PedSep-A, B, C, and D) were derived by assessing 25 bedside clinical variables in 404 children with sepsis. PedSep-D patients had a thrombotic microangiopathy and hyperinflammatory macrophage activation biomarker response, and improved survival odds associated with combined methylprednisolone plus intravenous immunoglobulin therapy.MeaningFour novel computable 24-hour phenotypes are identifiable (www.pedsepsis.pitt.edu) that could potentially facilitate enrollment in early precise anti-inflammatory trials targeting thrombotic microangiopathy and macrophage activation in pediatric sepsis.

BACKGROUND: H3K27M-mutated DMGs express high levels of the disialoganglioside GD2 and GD2-CAR T-cells (GD2-CART) regress DMG in preclinical models. METHODS: NCT04196413 is a 3 + 3 Phase I dose escalation trial testing GD2-CART in patients with biopsy-proved H3K27M DMG, with dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) considered independently for DIPG and spinal DMG (sDMG). Arm A tested escalating doses of IV GD2-CART (DL1=1e6 GD2-CART/kg; DL2=3e6 GD2-CART/kg) following lymphodepletion (LD). After the DLT period, patients with clinical and/or radiographic benefit were eligible for subsequent ICV GD2-CART infusions (10-30e6 GD2-CART) administered via Ommaya without LD. RESULTS: Twelve subjects were treated after standard radiotherapy, 7 of whom began treatment at the time of progression [n=4 DL1 (3 DIPG/1 sDMG); n=8 DL2 (6 DIPG/2 sDMG)]. No DLTs were observed on DL1. Three subjects experienced DLT on DL2 (2 DIPG/1 sDMG) due to grade-4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS). On both dose levels, all subjects exhibited transient symptoms related to on-tumor inflammation, termed Tumor Inflammation-Associated Neurotoxicity (TIAN); no DLT due to TIAN has occurred. Ten subjects experienced radiographic and/or clinical benefit after IV infusion and received subsequent ICV infusions (median=4 ICV infusions/pt, range=1-7). ICV infusions were not associated with high-grade CRS. Four patients continue to receive ICV infusions on study and have experienced continued clinical and radiographic benefit, currently 7-11 months following enrollment. Two patients (one sDMG, one DIPG) have experienced near-complete (>95%) tumor volume reduction. CONCLUSIONS: IV treatment of DIPG and sDMG with GD2-CART is safe at a dose of 1e6/kg, but associated with frequent high-grade CRS at 3e6/kg. ICV GD2-CART has been well tolerated and has mediated impressive sustained clinical benefit in some patients with DIPG/sDMG. Given these findings, we are launching a new arm to assess safety and activity and to define the recommended phase 2 dose for ICV delivery of GD2-CART without LD.

Background: H3K27M-mutated DMGs are universally lethal central nervous system tumors that express high levels of the disialoganglioside GD2. IV administered GD2-CAR T cells (GD2-CART) regress DMG in preclinical models, and locoregionally delivered CARs demonstrate enhanced activity in xenograft models of brain tumors. Methods: NCT04196413 is a 3+3 Phase I dose escalation trial testing GD2-CART in patients with H3K27M DMG, with dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) considered independently for DIPG and spinal DMG (sDMG). Arm A tested escalating doses of IV GD2-CART (DL1: 1e6 GD2-CART/kg; DL2=3e6 GD2-CART/kg) following lymphodepletion (LD). After the DLT period, patients with clinical and/or radiographic benefit were eligible for subsequent ICV GD2-CART (10-30e6 GD2-CART) administered via Ommaya catheter without LD every 4-8 weeks for a maximum of 12 doses. We previously reported early results from 4 patients treated on DL1, which demonstrated clinical activity and manageable toxicity. Here we provide updated results for DL1 and DL2. Results: Thirteen subjects were enrolled and 11 treated [n=4 DL1 (3 DIPG/1 sDMG); n=9 DL2 (7 DIPG/2 sDMG)]. Two subjects were removed prior to treatment due to rapid progression. No DLTs were observed on DL1. Three subjects experienced DLT on DL2 (2 DIPG/1 sDMG) due to grade 4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS), successfully managed with tocilizumab, anakinra, and corticosteroids. CRS occurred earlier on DL2 vs. DL1 (Day 3 vs 7). On both dose levels, all subjects exhibited transient symptoms related to on-tumor inflammation, termed Tumor Inflammation-Associated Neurotoxicity (TIAN), which was successfully managed with anakinra and, in some cases, CSF drainage and dexamethasone. No DLT due to TIAN has occurred. Ten patients have had adequate follow-up to assess benefit. Nine experienced radiographic and/or clinical benefit after IV infusion, and they received subsequent ICV GD2-CART infusions (median= 4 ICV infusions/pt, range 1-6). ICV infusions were not associated with high-grade CRS, although some subjects developed transient fever, headache, meningismus, nausea, and/or vomiting, and several subjects developed TIAN. Four patients continue to receive ICV infusions on study and have experienced continued clinical and radiographic benefit at 11+, 9.5+, 8+ and 7+ months following enrollment. A 31-year-old with sDMG has experienced a near-complete (>95%) reduction in tumor volume and a 17-year-old with DIPG experienced a near-complete (>98%) reduction in volume of a pontine tumor. Conclusions: IV treatment of DIPG and sDMG with GD2-CART is safe at a dose of 1e6/kg, but associated with unacceptable rates of high-grade CRS at 3e6/kg. ICV GD2-CART without LD, administered following a previous course of IV GD2-CART with LD, has been well tolerated and has mediated impressive sustained clinical benefit in some patients with DIPG/sDMG. Given these findings, we are launching a new arm to assess safety and activity and to define the recommended phase 2 dose for ICV delivery of GD2-CART without LD. Patients are eligible for up to 12 ICV infusions of GD2-CART administered every 4-6 weeks. Clinical benefit will be formally assessed using patient-reported outcomes. GD2-CART has the potential to transform therapy for patients with H3K27M+ DIPG/sDMG. Citation Format: Robbie G. Majzner, Jasia Mahdi, Sneha Ramakrishna, Shabnum Patel, Harshini Chinnasamy, Kristen Yeom, Liora Schultz, Valentin Barsan, Rebecca Richards, Cynthia Campen, Agnes Reschke, Angus Martin Shaw Toland, Christina Baggott, Sharon Mavroukakis, Emily Egeler, Jennifer Moon, Ashley Jacobs, Karen Yamabe-Kwong, Lindsey Rasmussen, Esther Nie, Sean Green, Michael Kunicki, Michelle Fujimoto, Zach Ehlinger, Warren Reynolds, Snehit Prabhu, Katherine E. Warren, Tim Cornell, Sonia Partap, Paul Fisher, Gerald Grant, Hannes Vogel, Bita Sahaf, Kara Davis, Steven Feldman, Michelle Monje, Crystal L. Mackall. Major tumor regressions in H3K27M-mutated diffuse midline glioma (DMG) following sequential intravenous (IV) and intracerebroventricular (ICV) delivery of GD2-CAR T cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT001.

A major change in Roman military policy appears to have occurred at the end of the reign of Augustus. Until then the empire had grown inexorably as a result of centuries of successful war. The conquest of Italy in the fourth and third centuries BC was followed by a series of major wars during the last two centuries of the Republic in Spain, North Africa, Greece, Asia Minor, Syria and continental Gaul, which resulted in the formation of a far-flung territorial empire directly controlled from Rome. The process of expansion continued under Augustus, whose armies overran Egypt, north-west Spain, the Alps, parts of Austria and most of the Balkans. An attempt to conquer Germany and to extend the Roman frontier to the Elbe had to be abandoned in AD 9, however, and the armies were brought back to the Rhine. By the end of his reign, Augustus had evidently decided against further expansion; on his deathbed, we are told, he instructed his heir to keep the empire within its existing borders.1

Quintus Fabius Pictor was the first Roman to write a history of his city in prose. A member of the great patrician family of the Fabii, he lived at the time of the First and Second Punic Wars (see Biographica: Ancestry and Public Career), and wrote about them in his historical work, which traced the history of Rome back to its remote origins (see Title and Scope). The work does not survive, and is known to us only through references and indirect quotations in later authors (see Editions of the Fragments). It was written in Greek, but a Latin version also circulated and is quoted by some later sources (see Language). It is unclear precisely when Fabius was writing, or in what circumstances (see Time of Writing, Political and Cultural Context). We also do not know what inspired him to write, or why he chose to write in Greek (see Political and Cultural Context, Purpose and Intended Readership). But it is clear that he initiated the tradition of historical writing at Rome, and was the first of many to trace its history from the beginning to his own time. Like his successors, he wrote at greater length on contemporary events than on the earlier centuries, which he covered briefly, although he may have given an extensive account of the foundation story (see Internal Architecture). Whether he arranged his material annalistically, covering events year by year, and if so for which period(s), is disputed (see Narrative Format). His influence has been variously assessed, with some regarding him as a fundamentally important source of information and inspiration for later Roman historians, and even as a pioneer of national historiography in the West, while others minimize his significance in the development of the Roman historical tradition (see Influence and Reception).