Search

Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and non-pharmacological interventions, with a particular focus on the subjective experiences of pupils in relation to the measures, the extent to which quarantine and illness with COVID-19 influenced their perception of the disease, the protective measures taken and the groups that were particularly affected., Methods: From November 2021 to February 2022, a written survey of tenth grade pupils from all nine secondary municipal schools in the city of Witten, Germany was conducted. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze and evaluate the data., Results: 98.3% of the pupils present in class (n=649) were included in the survey. Of the study population, 12.9% stated that they had already had COVID-19 and 43.6% had been quarantined. 27.3% of the pupils reported that mask-wearing was not easy for them, while 65.2% found wearing a mask easy. Furthermore, 33.4% reported that distance learning had negatively impacted their well-being, and 6.9% of the pupils reported that they had experienced more violence during the pandemic. Fear of COVID-19 was reported by 10% of the pupils, and was less frequently reported if pupils had already been infected with COVID-19 or had been quarantined. 75.7% reported no fear of COVID-19., Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic and the non-pharmacological measures to address it presented significant challenges and were a substantial burden on the pupils. The present study shows that the pandemic and/or the measures had a negative impact on the pupils. It is imperative to critically examine the measures, particularly in relation to vulnerable groups such as gender-diverse or socio-economically disadvantaged pupils. Education that is needs-based and target group-oriented can facilitate increased acceptance and perceptions of safety of implemented measures among pupils., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Since the beginning of the war in Ukraine, more than 7.6 million people from Ukraine have been registered as refugees in European countries. In Germany, the number is estimated to be more than 1 million. These refugees may have different health needs than German patients due to differences in the health care system, disease prevalence, preventive measures, health behavior, and experiences of flight. However, general practitioners (GPs) have hardly been prepared for the contact., Objectives: For the first time, challenges in the treatment of Ukrainian refugees and support needs of German GPs were determined., Materials and Methods: In July and August 2022, a cross-sectional study among GPs in Germany was conducted using an online survey., Results: A total of 82 GPs participated with a response rate of 16.0%; 52 of the participating GPs had treated Ukrainian refugees in the previous 2 weeks. In all, 75.0% of them reported difficulties or peculiarities in care, especially in communication (61.5%), due to lack of information about previous illnesses (34.6%), and expectations of services to be provided (30.8%). Of the 82 participants, 59.8% reported a need for multilingual information for patients, especially about the German health care system, help with mental health problems, contact points, and differences in the use of medications. Information for the practice team is needed in 37.8% of cases, especially on possibilities in case of language barriers, vaccination coverage in Ukraine, and dealing with missing vaccination records as well as drug lists., Conclusions: Due to the new situation of Ukrainian refugees in Germany and the mentioned barriers, GPs should be supported in care. Information for practice teams as well as their networking with psychotherapeutic offers, contact points, drug databases, and regional interpreter services are urgently needed. However, multilingual information for Ukrainian patients should be disseminated in order to relieve the burden on practices, which have been under great strain, and to ensure continuity and quality of care., (© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2023.)

Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) has gained importance in Germany and is also increasingly implemented in research in family medicine. Internationally, diverse frameworks give recommendations on how to successfully design and implement PPI in specific contexts. However, it is crucial to share experiences on PPI in specific settings such as family medicine in order to learn from each other. Thus, this article provides an overview of PPI concepts in the practice-based research networks (PBRNs) of the Initiative of German Practice-Based Research Networks - DESAM-ForNet. In the PBRNs patients and the public are involved in the research process by repeated group meetings in "public forums" (BayFoNet), "round tables" (FoPraNet-BW) or "patient advisory boards" (HAFO.NRW, RESPoNsE, SaxoForN) with a special focus on the planning and dissemination phase of projects. The most successful recruitment strategies so far have encompassed individual patient contacts of family physicians, postings/posters, local self-help organizations and standardized patient programs. Evaluation of PPI is currently being designed in most PBRNS. Overall, the PBRN-specific PPI concepts represent diverse possibilities to create long-term collaborative partnerships with patients and the public. These exemplary concepts are meant to encourage the further development and implementation of adapted PPI-concepts in family medicine research., (© Deutscher Ärzteverlag 2022.)

Background: Scientific findings can be an important source of knowledge for public health stakeholders involved in promoting physical activity, but several barriers hinder their use. Knowledge translation can simplify this process, but it requires the understanding of the stakeholder's needs., Objectives: This qualitative study aims to describe how public health stakeholders access information and scientific findings, identify possible barriers, and highlight the needs of stakeholders in terms of presentation and processing., Materials and Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with twelve local- and state-level stakeholders from North Rhine-Westphalia, Saxony-Anhalt, and Thuringia working in the area of physical activity promotion. The interviewees were selected through purposive sampling. The interviews were evaluated using qualitative content analysis., Results: The benefits of scientific findings are emphasized by the interviewees, but a lack of resources in combination with a flood of information, high complexity, and technical jargon complicate their application. There is a need for tailored preparation in the form of summaries, filter functions, elaboration of practice-relevant elements, and ways of provision., Conclusions: To achieve successful knowledge translation, collaboration and interactive exchange between researchers, policymakers, and practice as well as a demand-oriented processing of scientific findings are central. Networking and bundling of knowledge on a platform are important tasks for the future.

Objectives: Issues of living will and power of attorney must be addressed as early as possible in dementia patients because of their decreasing independence and ability to act for themselves. The aim of this study was to investigate whether general practitioners (GPs), who usually have long-standing and regular contact with this group of patients, address these precautionary measures and if there is any association between this approach and further communication and educational behaviour of doctors., Methods: A cross-sectional survey, using standardized, written questionnaires, was conducted in a random sample of 982 GPs in North Rhine-Westphalia in western Germany between October 2017 and January 2018. Descriptive statistical as well as logistic regression analyses were carried out using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 24., Results: A total of 339 GPs responded to the survey questionnaire (response rate: 34.5%). A majority of GPs (70.1%) agreed totally or partially that it was necessary to address their dementia patients on living will and power of attorney; GPs who were more confident in communicating a dementia diagnosis reported addressing the issue of documents for the end of life more frequently (aOR: 1.97; 95%-CI: 1.17-3.33). Older GPs with greater knowledge of regional services for dementia patients also tended to address this topic more frequently., Conclusions: General practitioners make a major contribution to help dementia patients and their relatives to plan ahead at an early stage of the disease. It can be concluded from our results that GPs' knowledge and experiences about dementia and local services, as well as how to deal with those affected should be improved in order to optimise communication on living will and power of attorney as precautionary measures., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)