Search

The diagnosis of device infections, especially pocket infections, is challenging and relies primarily on clinical presentation. The prospective DIRT (Device associated Infections Role of new diagnostic Tools) study identified procalcitonin (PCT) as the most promising biomarker among other 14 biomarkers to aid the diagnosis of pocket infection. It also identified an optimized cut-off value of 0.05 ng/ml for a localized generator pocket infection.The present study aims to validate the proposed PCT cut-off value of 0.05 ng/ml for the diagnosis of pocket infection in an independent cohort.We prospectively enrolled 81 patients with pocket infections and 81 controls matched for age and renal function presenting for elective device exchange or lead revision. Patients with concomitant infectious or inflammatory diseases, end-stage renal failure, current active malignancy, or receiving immunosuppressive therapy were excluded.An elevated PCT over 0.05 ng/ml was found in 68% (n = 55) of pocket infections and 24% (n = 19) of controls, corresponding to a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 77% for diagnosing a pocket infection. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, PCT showed an area under the curve of 0.75 (95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.83; P0.001). Sensitivity remained high with antibiotic pretreatment (65% compared to 69% without pretreatment) and in cases with minimal inflammatory signs (67% compared to 70% with extensive inflammation).Our study validates the cut-off value of 0.05 ng/ml PCT for diagnosis of a pocket infection, even in patients pre-treated with antibiotics or with minimal clinical signs of inflammation.

ZusammenfassungIm Gegensatz zum typischen Vorhofflattern handelt es sich beim atypischen Vorhofflattern um eine heterogene Gruppe von rechts- und linksatrialen Makro- bzw. Localized-Reentry-Tachykardien, deren kritischer Bestandteil zur Aufrechterhaltung der Tachykardie nicht der cavotrikuspidale Isthmus ist. Atypisches Vorhofflattern tritt gehäuft nach vorangegangener Katheterablation sowie nach herzchirurgischen Eingriffen auf. Die intraprozedurale Erfolgsrate während der Ablation ist hoch, wobei die Rezidivrate von strukturellen Veränderungen der Vorhöfe sowie des zugrundeliegenden Mechanismus abhängig ist. Dieser Artikel bietet einen Überblick über die Mechanismen sowie über Mapping- und Ablationsstrategien der häufigsten Formen von rechts- und linksatrialem atypischem Vorhofflattern. Dieser Beitrag ist Teil der Serie „EP-Basics“ zur gezielten Fortbildung im Bereich Invasive Elektrophysiologie. Grundlagen, Klinik und Therapie des atypischen Vorhofflatterns werden mit Fokus auf klinisch relevante Aspekte dargelegt. Vorgehensweise und Befunde der invasiven elektrophysiologischen Diagnostik und die Ablationsbehandlung bilden den Schwerpunkt dieses Artikels.

The rate of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is increasing, with an increasing rate of complex devices being implanted. TLE is now a routine part of cardiac device management and up-to-date data on the safety and efficacy of TLE with modern tools and techniques is essential to management decisions regarding noninfectious indications for lead extraction. We present a contemporary, prospective review of TLE at our high-volume cardiac center. All patients who underwent TLE from June 2016 to June 2019 were enrolled in our local database, and baseline clinical data, procedural information, and outcome data were collected. In total, 561 leads were explanted (n = 153) or extracted (n = 408) from 341 patients over the study period. Patients were predominantly male (71%), with a mean age of 65 ± 17 years. The most common indication for lead removal was lead failure (45.2%, n = 154), followed by infection of the pocket or device (29.3%, n = 100). In total, complete success was achieved in 96.4% (n = 541) leads, clinical success in a further 2.1% (n = 12), and failure only in 1.4% (n = 8). There was an overall complication rate of 0.9% (3/341) for major complications and 1.5% (5/341) for minor complications. There were no deaths. In conclusion, our data suggest that there are ongoing improvements in the safety profile and success rates of lead extraction undertaken by experienced operators. The major complication rate now is1%.

Aims Battery electric vehicle (BEV) sales and use are rapidly expanding. Battery electric vehicles, along with their charging stations, are a potential source of electromagnetic interference (EMI) for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). The new ‘high-power’ charging stations have the potential to create strong electromagnetic fields and induce EMI in CIEDs, and their safety has not been evaluated. Methods and results A total of 130 CIED patients performed 561 charges of four BEVs and a test vehicle (350 kW charge capacity) using high-power charging stations under continuous 6-lead electrocardiogram monitoring. The charging cable was placed directly over the CIED, and devices were programmed to maximize the chance of EMI detection. Cardiac implantable electronic devices were re-interrogated after patients charged all BEVs and the test vehicle for evidence of EMI. There were no incidences of EMI, specifically no over-sensing, pacing inhibition, inappropriate tachycardia detection, mode switching, or spontaneous reprogramming. The risk of EMI on a patient-based analysis is 0/130 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0%–2%], and the risk of EMI on a charge-based analysis is 0/561 (95% CI 0%–0.6%). The effective magnetic field along the charging cable was 38.65 µT and at the charging station was 77.9 µT. Conclusions The use of electric cars with high-power chargers by patients with cardiac devices appears to be safe with no evidence of clinically relevant EMI. Reasonable caution, by minimizing the time spent in close proximity with the charging cables, is still advised as the occurrence of very rare events cannot be excluded from our results.

Aims Bipolar radiofrequency ablation (B-RFA) has been reported as a bail-out strategy for the treatment of therapy refractory ventricular arrhythmias (VA). Currently, existing setups have not been standardized for B-RFA, while the impact of conventional B-RFA approaches on lesion formation remains unclear. Methods and results (i) In a multicentre observational study, patients undergoing B-RFA for previously therapy-refractory VA using a dedicated B-RFA setup were retrospectively analysed. (ii) Additionally, in an ex vivo model lesion formation during B-RFA was evaluated using porcine hearts. In a total of 26 procedures (24 patients), acute success was achieved in all 14 ventricular tachycardia (VT) procedures and 7/12 procedures with premature ventricular contractions (PVC), with major complications occurring in 1 procedure (atrioventricular block). During a median follow-up of 211 days in 21 patients, 6/11 patients (VT) and 5/10 patients (PVC) remained arrhythmia-free. Lesion formation in the ex vivo model during energy titration from 30 to 50 W led to similar lesion volumes compared with initial high-power 50 W B-RFA. Lesion size significantly increased when combining sequential unipolar and B-RFA (1429 mm3 vs. titration 501 mm3 vs. B-RFA 50 W 423 mm3, P < 0.001), an approach used in overall 58% of procedures and more frequently applied in procedures without VA recurrence (92% vs. 36%, P = 0.009). Adipose tissue severely limited lesion formation during B-RFA. Conclusion Using a dedicated device for B-RFA for therapy-refractory VA appears feasible and safe. While some patients need repeat ablation, success rates were encouraging. Sequential unipolar and B-RFA may be favourable for lesion formation.

Background: Femoral vascular access using the standard anatomic landmark-guided method is often limited by peripheral artery disease and obesity. We investigated the effect of ultrasound-guided vascular puncture (UGVP) on the rate of vascular complications in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial or ventricular arrhythmias. Methods: The data of 479 patients (59% male, mean age 68 years ± 11 years) undergoing catheter ablation for left atrial (n = 426; 89%), right atrial (n = 28; 6%) or ventricular arrhythmias (n = 28; 6%) were analyzed. All patients were on uninterrupted oral anticoagulants and heparin was administered intravenously during the procedure. Femoral access complications were compared between patients undergoing UGVP (n = 320; 67%) and patients undergoing a conventional approach (n = 159; 33%). Complication rates were also compared between patients with a BMI of >30 kg/m2 (n = 136) and patients with a BMI < 30 kg/m2 (n = 343). Results: Total vascular access complications including mild hematomas were n = 37 (7.7%). In the conventional group n = 17 (10.7%) and in the ultrasound (US) group n = 20 (6.3%) total vascular access complications occurred (OR 0.557, 95% CI 0.283–1.096). UGVP significantly reduced the risk of hematoma > 5 cm (OR 0.382, 95% CI 0.148, 0.988) or pseudoaneurysm (OR 0.160, 95% CI 0.032, 0.804). There was no significant difference between the groups regarding retroperitoneal hematomas or AV fistulas (p > 0.05). In patients with BMI > 30 kg/m2, UGVP led to a highly relevant reduction in the risk of total vascular access complications (OR 0.138, 95% CI 0.027, 0.659), hematomas > 5 cm (OR 0.051, 95% CI 0.000, 0.466) and pseudoaneurysms (OR 0.051, 95% CI 0.000, 0.466). Conclusion: UGVP significantly reduces vascular access complications. Patients with a BMI > 30 kg/m2 seem to particularly profit from a UGVP approach.

AimsThis retrospective study sought to compare complication rates and efficacy of power-controlled very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) and conventional catheter ablation in a large cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).Methods and resultsWe analyzed 1115 consecutive patients with AF (38.7% paroxysmal, 61.3% persistent) who received first-time catheter ablation at our centre from 2015 to 2021. Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation ± additional substrate ablation using an irrigated-tip catheter was performed with vHPSD (70 W/5–7 s or 60 W/7–10 s) in 574 patients and with conventional power (30–35 W/15–30 s) in 541 patients. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between groups (mean age 65.1 ± 11.2 years, 63.4% male). The 30-day incidence of cardiac tamponade [2/574 (0.35%) vs. 1/541 (0.18%), P = 0.598], pericardial effusion ≥ 10 mm [2/574 (0.35%) vs. 1/541 (0.18%), P = 0.598] and transient ischaemic attack [1/574 (0.17%) vs. 2/541 (0.37%), P = 0.529] was not significantly different between vHPSD and conventional ablation. No stroke, atrio-esophageal fistula, cardiac arrest or death occurred. Procedure (122.2 ± 46.8 min vs. 155.0 ± 50.5 min, P < 0.001), radiofrequency (22.4 ± 19.3 min vs. 52.9 ± 22.0 min, P < 0.001), and fluoroscopy (8.1 ± 7.2 vs. 9.2 ± 7.4, P = 0.016) duration were significantly shorter in the vHPSD group. At 12 months follow-up, freedom of any atrial arrhythmia was 44.1% vs. 34.2% (P = 0.010) in persistent AF and 78.1% vs. 70.2% in paroxysmal AF (P = 0.068).ConclusionvHPSD ablation is as safe as conventional ablation and is associated with an improved long-term efficacy in persistent AF.

In contrast to typical atrial flutter, atypical atrial flutter is a heterogeneous group of right and left atrial macro- or localized reentry tachycardias whose critical component for maintaining tachycardia is not the cavotricuspid isthmus. Atypical atrial flutter occurs more frequently after previous catheter ablation and after cardiac surgery. The intraprocedural success rate during ablation is high, although the recurrence rate depends on structural changes in the atria as well as the underlying mechanism. This article provides an overview of the mechanisms as well as mapping and ablation strategies of the most common forms of right and left atrial atypical atrial flutter. This article is part of the "EP Basics" series for targeted continuing education in invasive electrophysiology. Basics, clinic and therapy of atypical atrial flutter are presented with focus on clinically relevant aspects. Procedures and findings of invasive electrophysiological diagnostics and ablation treatment are the focus of this article.Im Gegensatz zum typischen Vorhofflattern handelt es sich beim atypischen Vorhofflattern um eine heterogene Gruppe von rechts- und linksatrialen Makro- bzw. Localized-Reentry-Tachykardien, deren kritischer Bestandteil zur Aufrechterhaltung der Tachykardie nicht der cavotrikuspidale Isthmus ist. Atypisches Vorhofflattern tritt gehäuft nach vorangegangener Katheterablation sowie nach herzchirurgischen Eingriffen auf. Die intraprozedurale Erfolgsrate während der Ablation ist hoch, wobei die Rezidivrate von strukturellen Veränderungen der Vorhöfe sowie des zugrundeliegenden Mechanismus abhängig ist. Dieser Artikel bietet einen Überblick über die Mechanismen sowie über Mapping- und Ablationsstrategien der häufigsten Formen von rechts- und linksatrialem atypischem Vorhofflattern. Dieser Beitrag ist Teil der Serie „EP-Basics“ zur gezielten Fortbildung im Bereich Invasive Elektrophysiologie. Grundlagen, Klinik und Therapie des atypischen Vorhofflatterns werden mit Fokus auf klinisch relevante Aspekte dargelegt. Vorgehensweise und Befunde der invasiven elektrophysiologischen Diagnostik und die Ablationsbehandlung bilden den Schwerpunkt dieses Artikels.

AIMS The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to assess the influence of early recurrence (ER) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) on long-term outcomes and to identify clinical variables associated with ER. METHODS We retrospectively collected clinical and procedural data from 1285 patients with paroxysmal AF who underwent PVI from 2011 to 2016. Kaplan-Meier, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed to analyze the influence of ER on long-term outcomes. RESULTS ER was observed in 13% of patients. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed significantly different outcomes in 1285 patients with and without ER (49% vs 74%, log rank P

This study was designed to evaluate the electromagnetic interference (EMI) effects and safety of the new security screening millimetre wave body scanners (MWBSs) for patients with rare cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). We identified 73 patients with either entirely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) or leadless pacemakers (LPM) attending routine device follow-up. CIED programming was optimised for the detection of EMI occurrence, and high-voltage therapy was disabled. Patients then underwent millimetre wave body scans under continuous ECG monitoring. Scanning was performed at the recommended distance as well as in close proximity to the scanner emulating accidental exposure. CIED function was observed for EMI effects. There were no episodes of inhibition of pacing in the leadless pacemaker subgroup, no oversensing in the S-ICD subgroup and no spontaneous device reprogramming in any group. There was no change in pacing or sensing thresholds, and S-ICD vector eligibility remained unchanged after scanning with the MWBS. No CIEDs were identified by the MWBS during the study. No EMI events were detected during the use of MWBSs by patients with either S-ICDs or LPMs. This data should be reassuring for patients suggesting that they can undergo security body scans without worries or disclosure of their CIED status.

In patients with persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) ablation procedures can be challenging. We sought to determine the feasibility and safety of left atrial ablations in patients with PLSVC, especially when PLSVC is unknown prior to the ablation procedure.In this retrospective analysis 15 adult patients (mean age 64.6 ± 14.5 years, 53.3% male) with PLSVC undergoing 27 ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation or left atrial flutter were included. In 5 (33.3%) patients PLSVC was only discovered during the procedure. Transseptal puncture (TSP) was declared "difficult" by the ablating physician in 13 of 27 (48.2%) procedures and was not successfully completed in the first attempt in two patients with known PLSVC. Once TSP was successfully completed, all relevant structures were reached both during mapping and ablation in all procedures independent of whether PLSVC was known prior to the procedure. One major complication (3.7%) occurred in 27 procedures in a patient with known PLSVC. In the patients with unknown PLSVC no complication occurred.In experienced hands, left atrial access and ablation in patients with PLSVC is feasible and safe, particularly with regard to patients in whom the PLSVC is unknown prior to the ablation procedure.

Background In paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), pulmonary vein isolation using HPSD has shown a promising success rate compared to ablation using conventional power settings, as well as a significant reduction in procedural and ablation time. In persistent atrial fibrillation, left atrial substrate modification seems to be a promising additional ablation approach besides pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, results after additional substrate ablation are not consistently positive, which may be related to non-transmural lesions and tissue oedema. An extended time of the procedure may also influence safety. Recent publications showed that HPSD ablation provides more sufficient lesions due to acute cell necrosis instead of cell oedema. Purpose The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety of HPSD ablation in patients undergoing ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation with PVI and additional substrate modification. Methods We studied and compared n=300 patients from our register undergoing the first ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation with HPSD settings (n=150) between May 2018 and January 2019 and standard settings (n=150) between July 2017 and January 2018. Patients were followed up for three months to report procedure-related adverse events. In all patients, a modified stepwise approach using PVI followed by electrogram-guided substrate modification and linear-ablation, if necessary, was performed. A HPSD ablation was performed with 70 watts with a maximum duration of 5–7 seconds. Catheter irrigation was set to 20 ml/min using the Flexability™ ablation catheter and the Ampere™ generator. The patients were compared with a historical cohort that underwent PVI using a conventional power protocol with 30–40 watts over 20–40 seconds, using the same ablation catheter. A transthoracic echocardiogram was performed in all patients after the ablation-procedure and on the following day. Duplex sonography or clinical control were performed to assess groin complications. Results Baseline characteristics and procedural data are shown in table 1. No significant difference in the complication rates in both groups was observed by a significant procedure-time reduction in HPSD-Group (2:13h vs 2:31h p Conclusion Complex ablation using PVI and additional substrate modification in persistent atrial fibrillation using HPSD seems to be equally as safe regarding procedure-related outcomes as standard power settings ablation and can significantly reduce the time of the overall procedure. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Catheter ablation in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients is a critical treatment strategy for complex arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial tachycardia (AT). In addition to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used in this patient population.The purpose of this study was to assess the safety of catheter ablation in ACHD patients on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with VKA or DOAC, examining thromboembolic, bleeding, and vascular access complications.Retrospective analysis of 234 ACHD patients with simple (n = 83), moderate (n = 66), or complex (n = 85) CHD (mean age 46 years) undergoing 368 ablation procedures on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with VKA (45.4%) or DOAC (54.6%) was undertaken. Arrhythmias were AF in 97, right AT in 181, left AT in 65, or a combination of AF and AT in 25.No thromboembolic complications occurred. Major complications occurred in 4 patients (1.1%; 1 VKA, 3 DOAC), including retroperitoneal hematoma in 2 and arteriovenous (AV) fistula requiring surgical treatment in 2. Minor bleeding or vascular access complications occurred in 46 cases (12.5%), including hematomas5 cm in 26, AV fistulas (not requiring surgical intervention) in 13, and pseudoaneurysms in 7 (thrombin injection in 3/7). Overall, no significant difference was found between DOAC (14.9%) and VKA groups (12.0%; P = .411).Catheter ablation in ACHD patients on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with VKA or DOAC is feasible and safe. No thromboembolic events occurred, and major bleeding or vascular access complications were rare. No significant differences regarding minor bleeding or vascular access complications between patients on DOAC or VKA were found.

Background High power short duration (HPSD) radiofrequency-ablation (RFA) is highly efficient and safe while reducing procedure and RF time in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The QDot-catheter is a novel contact-force ablation catheter that allows automated flow and power adjustments depending on the local tissue temperature to maintain a target temperature during 90watts/4seconds lesions. We analysed intraprocedural data and periprocedural safety using the QDot-catheter in patients undergoing PVI for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Methods We included n=48 patients undergoing PVI with the QDot-catheter with a temperature controlled HPSD ablation mode with 90watts/4seconds (TC-HPSD). If focal reconnection occurred besides repeat ablation the ablation mode was changed to 50watts/15seconds (QMode). N=23 patients underwent cerebral MRI to detect silent cerebral lesions. Results Mean RF-time was 8.1+/-2.8min, procedure-duration was 84.5+/-30min. The overall maximal measured catheter-tip temperature was 52.0°C +/- 4.6°C, mean overall applied current was 871mA +/-44mA and over all applied energy was 316J +/-47J. The mean local impedance-drop was 12.1 +/- 2.4 Ohms. During Adenosine challenge n=14 (29%) patients showed dormant conduction. A total of n=24 steam pops were detected in n=18 patients (39.1%), while no pericardial tamponade occurred. No periprocedural thromboembolic complications occurred, while n=4 patients (17.4%) showed silent cerebral lesion. Conclusion TC-HPSD ablation with 90watts/4seconds using the QDot-catheter led to a reduction of procedure and RF time, while no major complications occurred. Despite optimized temperature control and power adjustment steam pops occurred in a rather high number of patients, while none of them lead to tamponade or to clinical or neurological deficits.

Background Early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ERAT) is common after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation (AF), but its clinical significance in patients with persistent AF remains unclear. We sought to determine the predictive value of ERAT for rhythm outcome after RFCA for persistent AF. Methods The study included 207 consecutive patients (mean age 66.4 ± 10.7 years, male 66.2%) with persistent and long-standing persistent AF undergoing de novo pulmonary vein isolation (± atrial substrate ablation). All patients remained off antiarrhythmic drugs. ERAT was defined as any atrial arrhythmia ≥ 30 s occurring within the first 30 days. Late recurrence (LR) was determined during follow-up visits scheduled 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-ablation using 7-day Holter ECGs. Results ERAT occurred in 143/207 (69.1%) patients as AF (60%) or atrial tachycardia (40%) and was persistent in 82% of cases. During a median follow-up of 22.2 months, LR occurred significantly more often in patients with ERAT than in patients without ERAT (92.3 vs. 43.8%, P P P = 0.038). Extending the blanking period from 30 to 90 days did not impact LR rates. Conclusion ERAT following ablation of persistent AF is strongly associated with late arrhythmia recurrence, which challenges the assumption that ERAT represents merely a transient phenomenon. While limiting the blanking period to 30 days seems justified, the benefit of early re-ablations remains to be addressed in future studies. Graphic abstract

Catheter ablation is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a known risk factor for recurrent AF. The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) is a measurement tool to screen patients for OSA. We sought to evaluate if the ambulatory assessed AHI is associated with AF recurrence following AF catheter ablation. 187 patients with paroxysmal (n = 155) or early persistent (n = 32) AF presenting for catheter ablation were included in the study. AHI was determined prior to ablation using an ambulatory screening device. All patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). In patients with early persistent AF (17%) additional ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) was performed. Clinical follow-up was available after 3 and 12 months including 7-day Holter-ECG. All 187 patients (60.3 ± 11.4 years, 64.2% male) completed the 3 months follow-up and 170 patients the 12 months follow-up. A pathological AHI ≥15 was found in 45/187 (24.1%) patients. Additional CFAE did not differ between patients with an AHI ≥15 and AHI15 (p = 0.663). After 3 months, 12/41 (29.3%) patients with AHI ≥15 showed recurrent AF compared to 24/146 (16.4%) patients with AHI15 (p = 0.066). After 12 months, AHI ≥15 was associated with a significant higher rate of AF recurrence of 47.4% (18/38) versus 26.5% (35/132) in patients with AHI15 (p = 0.014). In the logistic regression analysis AHI ≥15 was an independent predictor of recurrent AF at 12 months (p = 0.011). In conclusion, ambulatory assessed AHI ≥15 is associated with increased risk for AF recurrence following catheter ablation. OSA screening should be performed in AF patients as it might influence catheter ablation success.

In cardiac electrophysiology, invasive procedures like catheter ablations or device implantations are getting increasingly complex. This poses challenges especially for electrophysiologists in training, not only to learn how to perform the procedure, but also how to manage possible complications. The present article uses exemplary case studies to present how to control complications and how to avoid them. The presented cases deal with complications such as air embolism in left atrial procedures, iatrogenic vascular injuries such as aortic dissection or dissection of the coronary sinus, complications and challenges with lead revisions, and pericardial tamponade. In each case, measures for avoidance as well as practical guidance for management are shown when the respective complication occurs.

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is significantly higher in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) compared to patients without congenital heart disease (CHD). As AF in ACHD patients might have significant hemodynamic consequences, rhythm control is particularly desirable but rarely achieved by antiarrhythmic drugs. The aim of this study was to investigate safety and long-term outcome of AF ablation in ACHD patients. All ACHD patients (n = 46) that underwent AF ablation at our centre from 2013 to 2017 were included in the study. CHD was classified as simple (46%), moderate (41%) or complex (13%). The majority of patients (61%) suffered from persistent AF (paroxysmal AF 39%). Persistent AF was present in 57% of patients with simple, in 58% of patients with moderate and 83% of patients with complex CHD. All patients underwent radiofrequency (RF) ablation on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed in patients with paroxysmal AF, whereas patients with persistent AF underwent PVI and ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE). No major complications occurred. Single-procedure success after 18 months off antiarrhythmic drugs was 61% for paroxysmal AF and 29% for persistent AF (p = 0.003). Multiple procedures (mean 2.1 ± 1.4) increased long-term success to 82% for paroxysmal AF and 48% for persistent AF (p = 0.05). Long-term ablation success was 64% for simple, 62% for moderate and 50% for complex CHD patients. AF ablation in ACHD patients is feasible and safe regardless of CHD complexity. Success rates in patients with paroxysmal AF are high and comparable to patients without CHD. In ACHD patients with persistent AF, success rates of ablation are markedly reduced which might be due to a different and/or more extensive (bi-)atrial substrate. In the cohort of complex ACHD patients with persistent AF as the dominant AF type, long-term success of AF ablation is limited.

Background Electric cars are increasingly used for public and private transportation and represent possible sources of electromagnetic interference (EMI). Potential implications for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) range from unnecessary driving restrictions to life-threatening device malfunction. This prospective, cross-sectional study was designed to assess the EMI risk of electric cars on CIED function. Methods One hundred and eight consecutive patients with CIEDs presenting for routine follow-up between May 2014 and January 2015 were enrolled in the study. The participants were exposed to electromagnetic fields generated by the four most common electric cars (Nissan Leaf, Tesla Model S, BMW i3, VW eUp) while roller-bench test-driving at Institute of Automotive Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University, Munich. The primary endpoint was any abnormalities in CIED function (e.g. oversensing with pacing-inhibition, inappropriate therapy or mode-switching) while driving or charging electric cars as assessed by electrocardiographic recordings and device interrogation. Results No change in device function or programming was seen in this cohort which is representative of contemporary CIED devices. The largest electromagnetic field detected was along the charging cable during high current charging (116.5 μT). The field strength in the cabin was lower (2.1-3.6 μT). Conclusions Electric cars produce electromagnetic fields; however, they did not affect CIED function or programming in our cohort. Driving and charging of electric cars is likely safe for patients with CIEDs.

Thromboembolic complications during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation due to mobilisation of a pre-existing thrombus formation (TF) in the left atrium (LA) are devastating. The gold standard to exclude LA TF is transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The present study compares sensitivity and specificity of a dual-source cardiac-computed tomography (DS-CT) with TEE for TF exclusion prior to AF ablation. In addition, CT protocols with and without ECG synchronized were evaluated. In 622 patients, DS-CT as well as TEE to exclude TF was performed less than 48 h prior to AF ablation. Mean age of patients was 60 ± 10 years (69% males, 61% paroxysmal AF). During DS-CT, 280 patients (45%) were in AF. An ECG-synchronized DS-CT was performed in 332 patients, whereas 290 patients underwent DS-CT without ECG synchronization. In all patients without suspected TF on DS-CT (n = 552; 88.7%), no thrombus was found on TEE. A TF was suspected on DS-CT in 70 patients, of whom only three patients showed TF on TEE. No TF was detected in the other 67 patients (Fig. 1). Overall, sensitivity for TF detection in DS-CT was 100% and specificity was 89.2% (positive predictive value 4.3%, negative predictive value 100%). The CT protocol (ECG-synchronized versus non-ECG-synchronized) had no significant influence on diagnostic accuracy. Mean dose length product during DS CT was 282 ± 287 mGy cm (synchronized) versus 136 ± 55 mGy cm (non-synchronized) with p

Data about the safety of edoxaban in patients who underwent left atrial (LA) radiofrequency (RF) ablation procedures are lacking. This study sought to compare the safety of uninterrupted edoxaban with uninterrupted phenprocoumon administration during LA RF ablation for atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia. In total, 231 patients (mean age 64 ± 11years, male 71%) who underwent LA RF ablation under continuous oral anticoagulation (OAC) with edoxaban or phenprocoumon were included in the study. Patients on uninterrupted edoxaban (60 mg or 30 mg/day for at least 4 weeks) were matched for gender, age and type of arrhythmia with 2 patients on uninterrupted phenprocoumon (international normalized ratio 2 to 3). We identified 77 consecutive patients on edoxaban and n = 154 patients on phenprocoumon. Heparin was administered periprocedurally to achieve an activated clotting time of 280 to 300 seconds. No protamine was administered periprocedurally. The primary end point was a composite of bleeding, thromboembolic events, and death. The primary end point was met in 9 patients in the edoxaban group and in 22 patients in the phenprocoumon group (p = 0.69). No patient in either group died or had a thromboembolic complication. No major bleeding complication was observed in the edoxaban group, whereas one was found in 1 patient in the phenprocoumon group (p ≥0.99). Minor bleeding complications occurred in 9 patients (12%) in the edoxaban group and in 21 patients (14%) in the phenprocoumon group (p = 0.84). Uninterrupted OAC with edoxaban appeared to be as safe as uninterrupted OAC with phenprocoumon in patients who underwent LA RF ablation procedures.

BACKGROUND Catheter ablation of right-sided accessory pathways (APs) has lower success and higher recurrence rates compared to left-sided substrates. Irrigated-tip catheter (ITC) ablation might offer an advantage in this setting but data about its use in patients below 18 years are scarce. The aim of this study was to compare an ITC approach to conventional catheter ablation. METHODS A retrospective analysis of all patients

The aim of this study was to compare safety and feasibility of a subcutaneous purse-string suture (PSS) with manual compression (MC) to gain hemostasis in patients after multiple femoral venous punctures undergoing electrophysiological procedures on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation (OAK). A total of 784 patients who underwent catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (n = 564) or (a)typical atrial flutter (n = 220) were assessed. Four hundred sixty-two patients received PSS (58.9%) and 322 patients (41.1%) received MC to gain hemostasis. All patients were on uninterrupted full-dose OAK. During the procedure, weight-adapted heparin was applied. Venous sheath diameter were 8Fr (n = 2)/11.5Fr (n = 1) for left atrial or 8Fr (n = 1)/6Fr (n = 2) for right atrial procedures. No protamine was administered at the end of the procedure. After PSS, patients' had 6 hours of bed rest compared with 10 hours after MC (sheath removal after 4 hours followed by a bandage for 6 hours). PSS was removed the following day. All patients underwent duplex sonography of the access site the following day. Using the PSS, hemostasis was achieved in 453 of 462 patients (98%). MC leads to hemostasis in all 322 patients. No difference was found between the 2 approaches regarding hematomas (5 cm or5 cm), arterio-venous fistulas, or pseudoaneurysms. No major complication such as ipsilateral leg ischemia, the need of vascular surgery, or deep vein thrombosis occurred. In conclusion, PSS is a safe and effective way to gain immediate hemostasis after multiple punctures of the femoral vein in patients undergoing catheter ablation on OAK. PSS avoids MC and leads to shorter patient immobilization.

Linear Ablation for AFBackground For persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, different strategies including complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) ablation and linear lesions (LL) have been used in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, it is still a matter of debate if extended substrate modification improves long-term outcome. The aim of this study was to determine the benefit of LL in addition to PVI and CFAE ablation regarding freedom from arrhythmia recurrence in patients with persistent AF. Methods The study was a prospective randomized trial including 90 patients with persistent and longstanding persistent AF. All patients underwent PVI and CFAE ablation. If AF did not terminate to atrial tachycardia (AT) or sinus rhythm, patients were randomized to direct current cardioversion (Group 1; n = 45) or LL (Group 2; n = 45). Primary endpoint was freedom from any atrial arrhythmia off antiarrhythmic drugs at 12 months. (NCT02059369) Results Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups with more than half of the patients having structural heart disease. The primary endpoint was reached in 37% in Group 1 (G1) and 16% in Group 2 (G2; P = 0.03). After a total number of 1.4 ± 0.5 (G1) versus 1.7 ± 0.4 (G2; P = 0.01) procedures, freedom from any arrhythmia was reached in 54% in G1 and 65% in G2 (P = 0.35). Conclusion In persistent AF ablation, LL in addition to PVI and CFAE show a significantly lower success rate after a single procedure compared to PVI and CFAE. Following LL, significantly more patients needed a reablation to reach a similar success rate during a 12-month follow-up.

There is a rising prevalence of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) as a result of an increasing implantation rate (worldwide >1 million/year), and many of these patients will undergo security screening for travel during their life ([1][1]). CIEDs are vulnerable to

Background Contact-force (CF) sensing catheters are increasingly used in electrophysiological procedures due to their efficacy and safety profile. As data about the accuracy of fiberoptic CF technology are scarce, we sought to quantify it using in vitro experiments. Methods and Results A force sensor was built with a flexible membrane to allow exact reference force measurements for each set of experiments. A TactiCath Quartz (TCQ) ablation catheter was brought in contact with the force sensor membrane in order to compare the TCQ force measurements to sensor reference force measurements. Measurements were performed at different tip angles (0°/perpendicular contact, 45°, 90°/parallel contact), with fluid irrigation, different degrees of catheter deflection, and using a sheath. The accuracy of the TCQ force measurements was 0.9 ± 0.9 g (0°), 0.8 ± 0.8 g (45°)and 1.2 ± 1.3 g (90°), 0.8 ± 0.7 g (irrigation), 0.8 ± 0.8 g (deflection), and 0.8 ± 0.9 g (sheath); this was not significantly different among all experimental conditions. The precision was ≤ 3.8 %. Conclusion CF measurements using a fiberoptic sensing technology show a high level of accuracy and precision, without being significantly influenced by tip angle, fluid irrigation, catheter deflection or use of a sheath. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation in otherwise healthy young patients has been termed "lone" atrial fibrillation (AF). The best treatment choice is still under discussion. The aim of this study was to report on efficacy and safety of catheter ablation. METHODS Among 855 patients referred to our center between 2011 and 2013, 76 (9%) met the diagnostic criteria for lone AF (mean age 45 ± 8 years; mean LA diameter 37 ± 4 mm; paroxysmal AF 82%; persistent AF 18%). The primary endpoint was freedom from any atrial tachycardia after the first ablation; the secondary endpoint was freedom from any atrial tachycardia after the last ablation procedure without antiarrhythmic drugs. RESULTS The primary endpoint occurred in 56 patients (74%) after a mean follow-up time of 444 ± 344 days. The secondary endpoint occurred in 73 patients (96%) after a mean of 1.3 ablations/patient during a follow-up time of 459 ± 366 days. The risk of AF recurrence was not influenced by AF duration or by the type of AF (paroxysmal versus persistent). In a multivariate regression analysis smoking (P = 0.001), first degree atrioventricular block (P = 0.001), and early (< 3 months) AF recurrence (P = 0.001) were independently associated with a higher risk of AF recurrence. Major peri-procedural adverse events did not occur. CONCLUSIONS Catheter ablation in young healthy patients is highly effective and safe. The outcomes are maintained during long-term follow-up irrespective of preoperative AF duration. Patients with AF recurrence were more likely to smoke, have first degree AV block and early AF recurrence.

Purpose Electromagnetic interference (EMI) with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) can cause oversensing and subsequently inappropriate ICD therapies. We retrospectively investigated the current incidence and clinical relevance of oversensing related EMI in a large cohort of ICD patients. Methods From January 2005 to April 2013, all ICD interrogations performed at our institution were analyzed for the occurrence of oversensing related EMI. EMI episodes were classified as clinically significant, potentially significant or of minor significance. To identify risk factors for EMI, we also analyzed different lead models in our cohort (integrated vs true bipolar leads). Results Data of 2940 ICD patients (mean age 63 ± 16 years, 2322 male patients, 7772 patient-years) were retrospectively analyzed for the occurrence of EMI. During the observation period, a total of 145 (hospital environment n = 97, non-hospital environment n = 48) episodes occurred and resulted in an overall EMI incidence, i.e. event rate, of 1.87 % per patient per year. Focusing on clinically significant or potentially significant episodes, the EMI incidence was 0.27 % per patient per year. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis did not reveal a statistically significant higher hazard of oversensing for patients with integrated bipolar leads compared to patients with true bipolar leads (HR = 2.21; 95 % CI 0.90-5.39; p = 0.083). Conclusions Our data demonstrate that EMI continues to occur in everyday life. Patients should be well informed about the potential sources and risks of EMI but they need not be overly concerned since the risk of EMI-especially in a non-hospital environment-is low.

Accuracy of Contact-Force SensingBackground Contact-force (CF) sensing catheters are increasingly used in clinical electrophysiological practice due to their efficacy and safety profile. As data about the accuracy of this technology are scarce, we sought to quantify accuracy based on in vitro experiments. Methods and Results A custom-made force sensor was constructed that allowed exact force reference measurements registered via a flexible membrane. A Smarttouch Surround Flow (ST SF) ablation catheter (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA) was brought in contact with the membrane of the force sensor in order to compare the ST SF force measurements to force sensor reference measurements. ST SF force sensing technology is based on deflection registration between the distal and proximal catheter tip. The experiment was repeated for n = 10 ST SF catheters, which showed no significant difference in accuracy levels. A series of measurements (n = 1200) was carried out for different angles of force acting to the catheter tip (0°/perpendicular contact, 30°, 60°, 90°/parallel contact). The mean absolute differences between reference and ST SF measurements were 1.7 ± 1.8 g (0°), 1.6 ± 1.2 g (30°), 1.4 ± 1.3 g (60°), and 6.6 ± 5.9 g (90°). Measurement accuracy was significantly higher in non-parallel contact when compared with parallel contact (P < 0.01). Conclusions Catheter force measurements using the ST SF catheters show a high level of accuracy regarding differences to reference measurements and reproducibility. The reduced accuracy in measurements of 90° acting forces (parallel contact) might be clinically important when creating, for example, linear lesions.

Transseptal Puncture Guided by 3D-Fluoroscopy Background Transseptal puncture for left atrial (LA) access is still mainly performed using fluoroscopy and transesophageal or intracardiac echocardiography. We present an easily applicable approach for the guidance of transseptal puncture that uses the combination of a 3D-mapping system and CT-derived 3D-overlayed anatomy. Methods and Results A computer tomographic (CT) LA-angiography was performed in n = 65 patients prior to a scheduled atrial fibrillation ablation procedure. The CARTO3® (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA) segmentation tool was used to create a 3D-reconstruction of cardiac anatomy and the spine. The CARTO UNIVU® module was then used to overlay and register the segmented 3D-anatomy onto fluoroscopy. The 3D-reconstructed spine and cardiac anatomy were congruently aligned to their fluoroscopic counterparts in fluoroscopic views. The feasibility of the technique, its safety, and accuracy (assessed as contour offsets between 3D-overlay and angiographic LA anatomy) were evaluated. Overlay registration accuracy was analyzed by CARTO3® registration matrices. Transseptal puncture was feasible without complications in all 65 patients using the new 3D-overlay technique. Three-dimensional-overlay contour offsets were 1.6 ± 1.2 mm in left PV, 1.7 ± 1.2 mm in right PV, and 1.3 ± 1.0 mm in the LA roof region. Overlay registration accuracy was 4.9 ± 2.7 mm. The average time needed for anatomy segmentation was 204 ± 61 seconds, time needed for overlay registration was 18 ± 8 seconds. Conclusions Three-dimensional-augmented fluoroscopy is feasible, safe, and easy to apply as guidance for transseptal puncture and demonstrates a high level of accuracy.

Aims This study presents and evaluates the impact of a new lowest-dose fluoroscopy protocol (Siemens AG), especially designed for electrophysiology (EP) procedures, on X-ray dose levels. Methods and results From October 2014 to March 2015, 140 patients underwent an EP study on an Artis zee angiography system. The standard low-dose protocol was operated at 23 nGy (fluoroscopy) and at 120 nGy (cine-loop), the new lowest-dose protocol was operated at 8 nGy (fluoroscopy) and at 36 nGy (cine-loop). Procedural data, X-ray times, and doses were analysed in 100 complex left atrial and in 40 standard EP procedures. The resulting dose–area products were 877.9 ± 624.7 µGym² ( n = 50 complex procedures, standard low dose), 199 ± 159.6 µGym² ( n = 50 complex procedures, lowest dose), 387.7 ± 36.0 µGym² ( n = 20 standard procedures, standard low dose), and 90.7 ± 62.3 µGym² ( n = 20 standard procedures, lowest dose), P < 0.01. In the low-dose and lowest-dose groups, procedure times were 132.6 ± 35.7 vs. 126.7 ± 34.7 min ( P = 0.40, complex procedures) and 72.3 ± 20.9 vs. 85.2 ± 44.1 min ( P = 0.24, standard procedures), radiofrequency (RF) times were 53.8 ± 26.1 vs. 50.4 ± 29.4 min ( P = 0.54, complex procedures) and 10.1 ± 9.9 vs. 12.2 ± 14.7 min ( P = 0.60, standard procedures). One complication occurred in the standard low-dose and lowest-dose groups ( P = 1.0). Conclusion The new lowest-dose imaging protocol reduces X-ray dose levels by 77% compared with the currently available standard low-dose protocol. From an operator standpoint, lowest X-ray dose levels create a different, reduced image quality. The new image quality did not significantly affect procedure or RF times and did not result in higher complication rates. Regarding radiological protection, operating at lowest-dose settings should become standard in EP procedures.

Patients with pacemakers or implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are advised to keep mobile phones at least 6 inches (15 cm) away from these devices to avoid electromagnetic interference. This is because electromagnetic fields emitted by phones can be misinterpreted as intrinsic cardiac

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake.