1. Supra-Inguinal Inflow for Distal Bypasses Have Acceptable Patency and Limb Salvage Rates.
- Author
-
Ratner M, Chang H, Johnson W, Maldonado T, Cayne N, Jacobowitz G, Siracuse JJ, Rockman C, and Garg K
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Aged, Female, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Risk Factors, Middle Aged, Risk Assessment, Popliteal Artery surgery, Popliteal Artery physiopathology, Popliteal Artery diagnostic imaging, Vascular Grafting adverse effects, Progression-Free Survival, Iliac Artery surgery, Iliac Artery physiopathology, Iliac Artery diagnostic imaging, Regional Blood Flow, Tibial Arteries physiopathology, Tibial Arteries surgery, Tibial Arteries diagnostic imaging, Lower Extremity blood supply, Treatment Outcome, Aged, 80 and over, Vascular Patency, Limb Salvage, Peripheral Arterial Disease physiopathology, Peripheral Arterial Disease surgery, Peripheral Arterial Disease diagnostic imaging, Amputation, Surgical, Databases, Factual
- Abstract
Background: There is a paucity of data evaluating outcomes of lower extremity bypass (LEB) using supra-inguinal inflow for revascularization of infra-inguinal vessels. The purpose of this study is to report outcomes after LEB originating from aortoiliac arteries to infra-femoral targets., Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative database (2003-2020) was queried for patients undergoing LEB from the aortoiliac arteries to the popliteal and tibial arteries. Patients were stratified into 3 cohorts based on outflow targets (above-knee [AK] popliteal, below-knee [BK] popliteal, and tibial arteries). Perioperative and 1-year outcomes including primary patency, amputation-free survival (AFS), and major adverse limb events (MALEs) were compared. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the independent prognostic factors of outcomes., Results: Of 403 LEBs, 389 (96.5%) originated from the external iliac artery, while the remaining used the aorta or common iliac artery as inflow. In terms of the distal target, the AK popliteal was used in 116 (28.8%), the BK popliteal in 151 (27.5%), and tibial vessels in 136 (43.7%) cases. BK popliteal and tibial bypasses, compared to AK popliteal bypasses, were more commonly performed in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (69.5% and 69.9% vs. 48.3%; P < 0.001). Vein conduit was more often used for tibial bypass than for AK and BK popliteal bypasses (46.3% vs. 21.9% and 16.3%; P < 0.001). In the perioperative period, BK popliteal and tibial bypass patients had higher reoperation rates (16.9% and 13.2% vs. 5.2%; P = 0.02) and lower primary patency (89.4% and 89% vs. 95.7%; P = 0.04) than AK bypass patients. At 1 year, compared with AK popliteal bypasses, BK and tibial bypasses demonstrated lower primary patency (81.9% vs. 56.7% vs. 52.4%, P < 0.001) and freedom from MALE (77.6% vs. 70.2% vs. 63.1%, P = 0.04), although AFS was not significantly different (89.7% vs. 90.6% vs. 83.8%, P = 0.19).On multivariable analysis, compared with AK popliteal bypasses, tibial bypasses were independently associated with increased loss of primary patency (hazard ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval, 1.03-3.51, P = 0.04). Subanalysis of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia demonstrated significantly higher primary patency in the AK popliteal cohort at discharge and 1 year, but no difference in AFS or freedom from MALE between the cohorts at follow-up., Conclusions: LEB with supra-inguinal inflow appear to have acceptable rates of 1-year patency and limb salvage in patients at high risk of bypass failure. Tibial outflow target was independently associated with worse primary patency but not with MALE or AFS., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF