Search

BACKGROUND: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPSS) is an effective treatment for portal hypertension and its associated complications. EUS-guided creation of an intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (IPSS) may become a useful alternative to conventional TIPSS. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of EUS-guided IPSS creation in a live porcine model. SETTING: Acute and survival experiments in 50-kg pigs. DESIGN AND INTERVENTIONS: Under linear-array EUS guidance, the hepatic vein (HV) and then the portal vein (PV) were punctured with a 19-gauge FNA needle. A 0.035-inch guidewire was advanced through the needle into the PV lumen. The needle was exchanged over the wire, a metal stent was deployed under EUS and fluoroscopic guidance, and the distal end of the stent was positioned inside the PV and the proximal end within the HV. Eight animals were euthanized after the procedure, and 2 animals were kept alive for 2 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Successful EUS-guided IPSS creation. RESULTS: Portosystemic shunt placement was successful in all animals. Intrahepatic vascular puncture and stent deployment were technically easy. Portosystemic flow through the shunt was documented by portal venogram and EUS Doppler. Necropsy performed after acute and survival experiments revealed no evidence of bleeding or damage to any intraperitoneal organs. There were no complications during the follow-up period in the 2 animals that were kept alive. LIMITATION: Experiments were performed in healthy animals with normal PV pressure. CONCLUSION: EUS-guided IPSS creation is technically feasible and may become an alternative to the currently used method of TIPSS placement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) may have less accuracy for the diagnosis and the assessment of the severity of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) than endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of both ERC and MRC in PSC. DESIGN: A case-control study. SETTING: University Hospital. PATIENTS: ERCs and MRCs of 36 patients with PSC and 51 controls (normal/other biliary tract diseases) were read in an independent, blinded, and random fashion by 2 magnetic resonance radiologists and 2 interventional endoscopists by using a previously validated classification system. Readers had no access to clinical history, laboratory results, or patient mix. RESULTS: Extrahepatic ductal (EHD) and intrahepatic ductal (IHD) visualization was excellent in 64% of 66% of MRCs and 86% of 74% of ERCs. Sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of PSC for readers 1 to 4 were 91% and 85%, 88% and 90%, 81% and 96%, and 83% and 96%. respectively. Receiver operating curve values were excellent for all readers (all >0.9). Interobserver agreement (kappa statistics) for the diagnosis of PSC (MRC, 0.83; ERC, 0.73) and for identifying the presence of IHD strictures (MRC, 0.64; ERC, 0.86) was good for both modalities, but only ERC (ERC, 0.55; MRC, 0.36) was good for the presence and the severity of EHD strictures. When assessment of disease severity was limited to the 36 patients with PSC, interobserver agreement was very poor for both MRC (0.23 and 0.07 for EHD and IHD, respectively) and ERC (0.24 and 0.34 for EHD and IHD, respectively). LIMITATIONS: The retrospective case-control study made it difficult to assess the impact of the diagnosis on patient management. CONCLUSIONS: ERC and MRC were comparable for diagnosing PSC, with very good interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of PSC and IHD strictures. Only ERC had good agreement for EHD strictures. Interobserver agreement was very poor for both MRC and ERC when disease severity of PSC was assessed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A bovine collagen matrix is sometimes used as a delivery medium during direct intratumoral injection of a chemo-therapeutic agent. The bovine collagen enhances the dose and duration of local drug delivery and limits systemic toxicity. Although this strategy is advocated as a means of easy and effective delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs, the associated risks are not well defined. We report the case of a 71-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent weekly intratumoral injections of cisplatin in a bovine collagen matrix. During the third injection, he suddenly and unexpectedly underwent cardiac arrest and died. An autopsy disclosed diffuse occlusion of the pulmonary microcirculation by bovine collagen. The collagen emboli were associated with an inflammatory infiltrate typical of bovine collagen-induced hypersensitivity. This case identifies a fatal complication of intratumoral chemotherapy injections using a bovine collagen matrix, which does not appear to have been previously reported. This case underscores the valuable role of the traditional autopsy examination as a means of identifying possible complications of novel oncologic strategies, which are being rapidly developed and implemented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Aims: There is a need to reduce the screen failure rate (SFR) in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) clinical trials (MASH+F2-3; MASH+F4) and identify people with high-risk MASH (MASH+F2-4) in clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate non-invasive tests (NITs) screening approaches for these target conditions., Methods: This was an individual participant data meta-analysis for the performance of NITs against liver biopsy for MASH+F2-4, MASH+F2-3 and MASH+F4. Index tests were the FibroScan-AST (FAST) score, liver stiffness measured using vibration-controlled transient elastography (LSM-VCTE), the fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4) and the NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS). Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) and thresholds including those that achieved 34% SFR were reported., Results: We included 2281 unique cases. The prevalence of MASH+F2-4, MASH+F2-3 and MASH+F4 was 31%, 24% and 7%, respectively. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curves for MASH+F2-4 were .78, .75, .68 and .57 for FAST, LSM-VCTE, FIB-4 and NFS. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curves for MASH+F2-3 were .73, .67, .60, .58 for FAST, LSM-VCTE, FIB-4 and NFS. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curves for MASH+F4 were .79, .84, .81, .76 for FAST, LSM-VCTE, FIB-4 and NFS. The sequential combination of FIB-4 and LSM-VCTE for the detection of MASH+F2-3 with threshold of .7 and 3.48, and 5.9 and 20 kPa achieved SFR of 67% and sensitivity of 60%, detecting 15 true positive cases from a theoretical group of 100 participants at the prevalence of 24%., Conclusions: Sequential combinations of NITs do not compromise diagnostic performance and may reduce resource utilisation through the need of fewer LSM-VCTE examinations., (© 2024 The Authors. Liver International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Alcohol liver disease (ALD) may coexist with hepatitis C (HCV) in many transplant recipients (alcoholic cirrhosis with hepatitis C [AHC]). Our objective was to determine whether there were differences in postliver transplantation outcomes of patients with AHC when compared with those with alcoholic cirrhosis (AC) and/or alcoholic hepatitis (AH)., Methods: Using UNOS explant data sets (2016-2020), the survival probabilities of AC, AH, and AHC were compared by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Cox proportional-hazard regression analysis was used to determine outcomes after adjusting for disease confounders. The outcomes were also compared with predirect antiviral agent (DAA) period., Results: During study period, 8369 biopsy-proven ALD liver transplant recipients were identified. Of those, 647 had AHC (HCV + alcohol), 353 had AH, and 7369 had AC. MELD-Na score (28.7 ± 9.5 versus 23.8 ± 10.7; P  < 0.001) and presence of ACLF-3 (19% versus 11%; P  < 0.001) were higher in AC + AH as compared with AHC. AHC and AC+AH has similar adjusted mortality at 1-y, but 3-y (hazard ratios, 1.76; 95% confidence intervals, 1.32-2.35; P  < 0.0001) and 5-y (hazard ratios, 1.64; 95% confidence intervals, 1.24-2.15; P  = 0.0004) mortality rates were higher in AHC. Survival improved in the DAA era (2016-2020) compared with 2009 to 2013 in AHC, but remained worse in AHC group versus AC and/or AH. Malignancy-related mortality was higher in AHC (15% versus 9.3% in AC) in the DAA era., Conclusions: AHC was associated with lower 3- and 5-y post-LT survival as compared with ALD without HCV and the worse outcomes in AHC group continued in the DAA era., Competing Interests: The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: There is a paucity of studies on older patients (≥65 years) who develop acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF). The objectives of our study were to determine clinical characteristics and outcomes of older patients listed for liver transplantation (LT)., Methods: Adults listed for LT with estimated ACLF (Est-ACLF) between 2005 and 2021 were identified using the United Network for Organ Sharing database and subdivided into older and younger age (18-64 years) groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to evaluate survival, and a competing-risk model (Fine-Gray) was used to evaluate risk factors for survival on the waitlist. Logistic regression was done to evaluate risk factors., Results: A total of 4313 older (14%) and 26,628 younger (86%) patients were listed for LT, and 2142 (49.6%) and 16,931 (63.5%) were transplanted, respectively. Older patients had a higher 30-day waitlist mortality than younger patients (20.4% vs 16.7%; P < .0001); this was more pronounced in Est-ACLF-2 (23.7% vs 14.8%; P < .0001) and Est-ACLF-3 (43.3% vs 29.9%; P < .0001). One-year post-LT, patient survival in older patients with Est-ACLF grades 1, 2, and 3 were 86.4%, 85.5%, and 77% respectively; younger patients had better survival across all Est-ACLF grades. When adjusted for transplant eras, respiratory failure was the only independent risk factor for increased 1-year post-LT mortality in older patients., Conclusion: Older patients with Est-CLF had significantly higher waitlist mortality than younger patients, but had acceptable 1-year post-LT survival including those with Est-ACLF-3; therefore, age alone should not be considered as a contraindication for LT. Older patients with respiratory failure should be carefully selected for LT., (Copyright © 2024 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cirrhosis is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. One of the most serious and unpredictable complication of cirrhosis, with a high mortality rate, is bleeding from esophagogastric varices. Endoscopic screening of varices followed by primary prophylactic treatment with beta blockers or band ligation in the presence of large esophageal varices will reduce the variceal bleeding rates and thereby reduce mortality risks in those with advanced cirrhosis. There is a paucity of data on primary prophylaxis of gastric varices but secondary prophylaxis includes glue injection, balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration, or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting with coil embolization., Competing Interests: Disclosures The authors have no financial conflicts of interests and did not receive funding from any sources for this article., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Seladelpar is a potent and selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-δ agonist that targets multiple cell types involved in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), leading to anti-cholestatic, anti-inflammatory and anti-pruritic effects., Aims: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of seladelpar in patients with PBC., Methods: In an open-label, international, long-term extension study, patients with PBC completing seladelpar lead-in studies continued treatment. Seladelpar was taken orally once daily at doses of 5 or 10 mg with dose adjustment permitted for safety or tolerability. The primary analysis was for safety and the secondary efficacy analysis examined biochemical markers of cholestasis and liver injury. The study was terminated early due to the unexpected histological findings in a concurrent study for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, which were subsequently found to predate treatment. Safety and efficacy data were analysed through 2 years., Results: There were no serious treatment-related adverse events observed among 106 patients treated with seladelpar for up to 2 years. There were four discontinuations for safety, one possibly related to seladelpar. Among 53 patients who completed 2 years of seladelpar, response rates increased from years 1 to 2 for the composite endpoint (alkaline phosphatase [ALP] <1.67 × ULN, ≥15% decrease in ALP, and total bilirubin ≤ULN) and ALP normalisation from 66% to 79% and from 26% to 42%, respectively. In those with elevated bilirubin at baseline, 43% achieved normalisation at year 2., Conclusions: Seladelpar was safe, and markedly improved biochemical markers of cholestasis and liver injury in patients with PBC. These effects were maintained or improved throughout the second year., Clinicaltrials: gov: NCT03301506; Clinicaltrialsregister.eu: 2017-003910-16., (© 2023 CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc and The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background & Aims: There is an unmet need to validate simple and easily available methods that can be used in routine practice to identify those at risk of adverse outcomes from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). A retrospective-prospective analysis of NAFLD patients enrolled in a longitudinal noninterventional study (TARGET-NASH) was performed to validate the prognostic utility of the following risk-categories: (A) Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) <1.3 and/or liver-stiffness measurement (LSM) measured by Fibroscan <8 kp, (B) FIB-4 1.31‒2.6 and/or LSM 8.1-12.5 kp, and (C) FIB-4 >2.6 and/or LSM >12.5 kp., Methods: Those in class A with aspartate transaminase:alanine transaminase ratio >1 or platelets <150,000/mm 3 , or class B with aspartate transaminase:alanine transaminase ratio >1 or platelets <150,000/mm 3 were upstaged by one class. Fine-Gray competing risk analyses were performed for all outcomes., Results: A total of 2523 individuals (class A = 555, B = 879, C = 1089) were followed for a median duration of 3.74 years. Adverse outcomes increased from class A to C in all-cause mortality (0.07 vs 0.3 vs 2.5/100 person-years [PY], hazard ratio [HR], 3.0 and 16.3 class B and C vs A), liver-associated clinical events (0.2 vs 1 vs 8/100 PY, HR, 4.3 and 36.6 B and C vs A), major adverse cardiovascular events (0.69 vs 0.87 vs 2.02/100 PY, HR, 0.78 and 1.55 B and C vs A), hepatocellular carcinoma (0 vs 0.09 vs 0.88/100 PY, HR, 8.32 C vs B), and chronic kidney disease (1.24 vs 2.48 vs 3.51/100 PY). Those who were upstaged had outcome rates similar to the lower class defined by their FIB-4., Conclusions: These data support a FIB-4-based risk-stratification of NAFLD that can be used in routine clinical practice., Clinicaltrials: gov Identifier: NCT02815891., (Copyright © 2023 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Patients with acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF-3) have a very high short-term mortality without liver transplantation (LT). Our objective was to determine whether early LT (ELT; ≤ 7 days from listing) had an impact on 1 year patient (PS) in patients with ACLF-3 compared to late LT (LLT; days 8-28 from listing)., Methods: All adults with ACLF-3 listed for LT with the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) between 2005 and 2021 were included. We excluded status one patients and those with liver cancer or listed for multi-organ or living donor transplants. ACLF patients were identified using the European Association for the Study of the Liver-Chronic Liver Failure criteria. Patients were categorized as ACLF-3a and ACLF-3b., Results: During the study period, 7607 patients were listed with ACLF-3 (3a-4520, 3b-3087); 3498 patients with ACLF-3 underwent ELT and 1308 had LLT. The overall 1 year PS after listing was 64.4% in ACLF-3a and 50% in ACLF-3b. In 4806 ACLF-3 patients who underwent LT, 1 year PS was 86.2%, but those who had ELT had higher survival (87.1 vs. 83.6%, P = 0.001) than the LLT group. These survival benefits were seen in both ACLF-3a and ACLF-3b. On multivariable analysis, age (HR 1.02, CI 1.01-1.03), diabetes (HR 1.40, CI 1.16-1.68), respiratory failure (HR 1.76, CI 1.50-2.08), donor risk index > 1.7 (HR 1.24, CI 1.06-1.45), and LLT (HR 1.20, CI 1.02-1.43) were independent predictors of higher 1 year mortality while higher albumin (HR 0.89, CI 0.80-0.98) was associated with reduced mortality., Conclusion: Early LT (≤ 7 days from listing) in ACLF-3 is associated with better 1 year survival compared to late LT (days 8-28 from listing)., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction and Objectives: Although hyponatremia and hepatic encephalopathy (HE) are known independent predictors of mortality, their combined effect is unknown. We investigated whether the inpatient mortality differed among patients with both hyponatremia and HE compared to those with either hyponatremia or HE alone., Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, data were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to identify US adults (aged ≥18 years) with cirrhosis between January 1st, 2016, and December 31st, 2017. We analyzed the effects of hyponatremia, HE, or a combination of hyponatremia and HE on inpatient mortality using logistic regression., Results: Among 309,841 cirrhosis-related admissions, 22,870 (7%) patients died during hospitalization. Those with a combination of hyponatremia and HE had higher mortality (14%) than those with HE only (11%), hyponatremia only (9%), and neither hyponatremia nor HE (6%) (p<0.001). When compared to patients without hyponatremia or HE, patients with both hyponatremia and HE had the highest odds (adjusted odds ratio or aOR) of inpatient mortality (aOR 1.90, 95% CI: 1.79 - 2.01) followed by patients with HE only (aOR 1.75, 95% CI: 1.69 - 1.82) and patients with hyponatremia only (aOR 1.17, 95% CI: 1.12 - 1.22). Patients with HE only had 50% higher odds of inpatient mortality when compared to those with hyponatremia only (aOR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.43 - 1.57)., Conclusions: In this nationwide study, the presence of both hyponatremia and HE was associated with higher inpatient mortality than either hyponatremia or HE alone., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None., (Copyright © 2023 Fundación Clínica Médica Sur, A.C. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Cirrhosis is complicated by a high rate of nosocomial infections (NIs), which result in poor outcomes and are challenging to predict using clinical variables alone. Our aim was to determine predictors of NI using admission serum metabolomics and gut microbiota in inpatients with cirrhosis. In this multicenter inpatient cirrhosis study, serum was collected on admission for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry metabolomics, and a subset provided stool for 16SrRNA analysis. Hospital course, including NI development and death, were analyzed. Metabolomic analysis using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) (demographics, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease [MELD] admission score, white blood count [WBC], rifaximin, and infection status adjusted) and random forest analyses for NI development were performed. Additional values of serum metabolites over clinical variables toward NI were evaluated using logistic regression. Stool microbiota and metabolomic correlations were compared in patients with and without NI development. A total of 602 patients (231 infection admissions) were included; 101 (17%) developed NIs, which resulted in worse inpatient outcomes, including intensive care unit transfer, organ failure, and death. A total of 127 patients also gave stool samples, and 20 of these patients developed NIs. The most common NIs were spontaneous bacterial peritonitis followed by urinary tract infection, Clostridioides difficile, and pneumonia. A total of 247 metabolites were significantly altered on ANCOVA. Higher MELD scores (odds ratio, 1.05; p < 0.0001), admission infection (odds ratio, 3.54; p < 0.0001), and admission WBC (odds ratio, 1.05; p = 0.04) predicted NI (area under the curve, 0.74), which increased to 0.77 (p = 0.05) with lower 1-linolenoyl-glycerolphosphocholine (GPC) and 1-stearoyl-GPC and higher N-acetyltryptophan and N-acetyl isoputreanine. Commensal microbiota were lower and pathobionts were higher in those who developed NIs. Microbial-metabolite correlation networks were complex and dense in patients with NIs, especially sub-networks centered on Ruminococcaceae and Pseudomonadaceae. NIs are common and associated with poor outcomes in cirrhosis. Admission gut microbiota in patients with NIs showed higher pathobionts and lower commensal microbiota. Microbial-metabolomic correlations were more complex, dense, and homogeneous among those who developed NIs, indicating greater linkage strength. Serum metabolites and gut microbiota on admission are associated with NI development in cirrhosis., (© 2022 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a dynamic syndrome associated with a very high short-term mortality. Hence, the ongoing assessment of treatment response, an expedited liver transplant evaluation and listing, and the determination of futility of treatment are critical for optimal outcomes. In this review, we appraise our current understanding of the timing and futility of liver transplantation, and the short- and long-term outcomes including the quality of life after deceased or live donor liver transplantation in those with ACLF., (© 2022. Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver.)

Background & Aims: We examined the efficacy and safety of seladelpar, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-delta agonist, in adults with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) at risk of disease progression (alkaline phosphatase [ALP] ≥1.67xupper limit of normal [ULN]) who were receiving or intolerant to ursodeoxycholic acid., Methods: In this 52-week, phase II, dose-ranging, open-label study, patients were randomized (1:1) to seladelpar 5 mg/day (n = 53) or 10 mg/day (n = 55) or assigned to 2 mg/day (n = 11; United Kingdom sites after interim analysis) for 12 weeks. Doses could then be uptitrated to 10 mg/day. The primary efficacy endpoint was ALP change from baseline to Week 8., Results: Mean baseline ALP was 300, 345, and 295 U/L in the 2 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg cohorts, respectively. Twenty-one percent of patients had cirrhosis, 71% had pruritus. At Week 8, mean ± standard error ALP reductions from baseline were 26 ± 2.8%, 33 ± 2.6%, and 41 ± 1.8% in the 2 mg (n = 11), 5 mg (n = 49), and 10 mg (n = 52) cohorts (all p ≤0.005), respectively. Responses were maintained or improved at Week 52, after dose escalation in 91% and 80% of the 2 mg and 5 mg cohorts, respectively. At Week 52, composite response (ALP <1.67xULN, ≥15% ALP decrease, and normal total bilirubin) rates were 64%, 53%, and 67%, and ALP normalization rates were 9%, 13%, and 33% in the 2 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg cohorts, respectively. Pruritus visual analog scale score was decreased in the 5 mg and 10 mg cohorts. There were no treatment-related serious adverse events, and 4 patients discontinued due to adverse events., Conclusions: Seladelpar demonstrated robust, dose-dependent, clinically significant, and durable improvements in biochemical markers of cholestasis and inflammation in patients with PBC at risk of disease progression. Seladelpar appeared safe and well tolerated and was not associated with any increase in pruritus., Gov Number: NCT02955602 CLINICALTRIALSREGISTER., Eu Number: 2016-002996-91 LAY SUMMARY: Current treatment options for patients living with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) are not optimal due to inadequate effectiveness or undesirable side effects. Patients with PBC who took seladelpar, a new treatment being developed for PBC, at increasing doses (2, 5, or 10 mg/day) for 1 year had clinically significant, dose-dependent improvements in key liver tests. Treatment appeared safe and was not associated with any worsening in patient self-reported itch scores., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest Christopher Bowlus has received grants from Arena Pharmaceuticals, Cara Therapeutics, Genfit, Genkyotex, and Novartis and grants and personal fees from CymaBay Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, and Intercept. Michael Galambos has received consulting and investigator fees from CymaBay Therapeutics. Richard Aspinall owns stock in CymaBay Therapeutics. Gideon M. Hirschfield has received personal fees from CymaBay Therapeutics, Genfit, GlaxoSmithKline, HighTide, Intercept Pharma, Mirum, and Pliant. David E. Jones has received personal fees from Abbott and Falk and personal fees and a grant from Intercept. Stuart C. Gordon has received personal fees and advisory board compensation from CymaBay Therapeutics and research support was paid to his institution by AbbVie, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, CymaBay Therapeutics, DURECT, Eiger, Genfit, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Intercept, Merck, Pliant, Shire, and Viking. Stephen A. Harrison has received personal fees from AgonAB, Altimmune, Boston Pharmaceuticals, B Riley FBR, Canfite Biopharma, Echosens North America, Fibronostics, Foresite Labs, Fortress Biotech, GNS Healthcare, Histoindex Pte, Inipharm, Ionis, Kowa Research Institute, Medpace, Microba Pty, Nutrasource, Piper Sandler & Co, Prometic Pharma Smt, Ridgeline Therapeutics, Sonic Incytes Medical Corporation, and Terns; grants from Cirius Therapeutics, Galmed Research & Development, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, and Pathai; personal fees and grants from Akero Therapeutics, Axcella Health, Civi Biopharma, CymaBay Therapeutics, Enyo Pharma S.A., Galectin Therapeutics, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, High Tide, Intercept, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Metracrine, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Northsea Therapeutics B.V., Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Sagimet Biosciences, and Viking Therapeutics; advisory board compensation from 89Bio, Akero Therapeutics, Altimmune, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Axcella Health, Civi Biopharma, CymaBay Therapeutics, Echosens North America, Foresite Labs, Galectin Therapeutics, Galmed Research & Development, Genfit, Gilead, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, High Tide, Histoindex Pte, Indalo Therapeutics, Intercept, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Medpace, Metacrine, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Northsea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Prometic Pharma Smt, Ridgeline Therapeutics, Sagimet Biosciences, Terns, and Theratechnologies; and owns stock in Akero Therapeutics, Cirius Therapeutics, Galectin Therapeutics, Genfit, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Histoindex Pte, Metacrine, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Northsea Therapeutics B.V., and Pathai. Andreas E. Kremer has received personal fees from AbbVie, Bayer, CymaBay Therapeutics, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Escient, Falk, FMC, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Mirum, MSD, Myr, Newbridge, Novartis, and Zambon and personal fees and a grant from Intercept. Marlyn J. Mayo has received consulting and investigator fees from CymaBay Therapeutics. Paul J. Thuluvath has received a grant from CymaBay Therapeutics. Cynthia Levy has received grants from Genkyotex, Gilead, High Tide, Intercept, Novartis, and Zydus and grants and personal fees from Cara Therapeutics, CymaBay Therapeutics, Genfit, and GlaxoSmithKline. Mark Swain has received grants from CymaBay Therapeutics and Genfit and a grant and personal fees from Intercept. Yvonne Dörffel, Guy Neff, David Sheridan, Carmen Stanca, Christoph Berg, and Aparna Goel have nothing to disclose. Mitchell L. Shiffman has received grants from CymaBay Therapeutics, High Tide, and Genfit and grants and personal fees from Intercept. John M. Vierling has received grants from Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, and Intercept; personal fees from Intercept and Novartis; and personal fees and grants from CymaBay Therapeutics. Pol Boudes is a former employee of CymaBay Therapeutics who owns stock in CymaBay Therapeutics and holds a patent broadly relevant to this work. Alexandra Steinberg is a former employee of CymaBay Therapeutics who owns stock in CymaBay Therapeutics. Yun-Jung Choi is an employee of and owns stock in CymaBay Therapeutics. Charles McWherter is an employee of and owns stock in CymaBay Therapeutics and holds patents broadly relevant to this work. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is characterised by hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and injury, and is associated with an increased risk of liver transplantation and death. NASH affects more than 16 million people in the USA, and there is no approved therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of aldafermin, an engineered analogue of the gut hormone fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19)., Methods: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study (ALPINE 2/3) in patients with biopsy-confirmed NASH and stage 2 or 3 fibrosis, we randomly assigned patients stratified by fibrosis stage in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive placebo, aldafermin 0·3 mg, 1·0 mg, or 3·0 mg once daily for 24 weeks at 30 study sites in the USA. Patients, investigators, the funder, and all other staff, were masked to treatment assignment throughout the study. The primary endpoint was an improvement in liver fibrosis of at least one stage with no worsening of NASH at week 24. Analyses were done by intention-to-treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03912532, and has been completed., Findings: Between May 16, 2019, and Sept 4, 2020, 786 patients were screened, of whom 171 were randomly assigned to a treatment group and included in the intention-to-treat population: 43 in the 0·3 mg aldafermin group, 42 in the 1·0 mg group, 43 in the 3·0 mg group, and 43 in the placebo group. In total, 145 (85%) of patients completed treatment. At week 24, among patients with biopsies at both baseline and week 24, was seven (19%) of 36 patients in the placebo group, 11 (31%) of 36 in the 0·3 mg aldafermin group (difference 90% CI 12% [-9 to 33]; p=0·11), five (15%) of 34 patients in the 1·0 mg group (difference -5% [-24 to 13]; p=0·80), and 11 (30%) of 37 patients in the 3·0 mg group (difference 10% [-9 to 30]; p=0·12) had an improvement in liver fibrosis of at least one stage with no worsening of NASH, without meeting the prespecified significance for dose response (p=0·55). Adverse events were mostly mild or moderate in severity. Diarrhoea occurred in six (14%) of 43 patients in the placebo group, three (7%) of 43 patients in the 0·3 mg aldafermin group, five (12%) of 41 patients in the 1·0 mg group, and ten (23%) of 43 patients in the 3·0 mg group. Incidences of serious adverse events and discontinuations owing to adverse events were similar between groups., Interpretation: Aldafermin was generally well tolerated but did not produce a significant dose response on fibrosis improvement of at least one stage with no worsening of NASH, despite positive effects on a number of secondary endpoints. The findings of this trial may have implications for the design of future NASH trials., Funding: NGM Biopharmaceuticals., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SAH reports grant and research support from Akero, Axcella, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cymabay, Enyo, Galectin, Genentech, Genfit, Gilead, Hepion, Hightide, Intercept, Madrigal, Metacrine, NGM, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Northsea, Pfizer, Sagimet, Viking, and 89 Bio; is a scientific advisor or consultant for Akero, Alentis, Altimmune, Arrowhead, Axcella, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Echosens, Forest Labs, Galectin, Gilead, Hepion, Hepagene, HistoIndex, Intercept, Madrigal, Medpace, Metacrine, NGM, Northsea, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, PathAI, Poxel, Sagimet, Sonic Incytes, Terns, and Viking; and has stock options in Akero, Cirius, Chronwell, Galectin, Genfit, Hepion, HistoIndex, Metacrine, NGM, and Northsea. MFA reports grant and research support from Allergan, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boeringher Ingelheim, Celgene, Genentech, Hanmi, Intercept, Inventiva, Magrigal, NGM, NovoNordisk, and Viking; is a consultant for Hanmi and Madrigal; and serves on an advisory committee for 89Bio, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Hanmi, NGM, Novo Nordisk, and Thera. CDG reports grant and research support from 89Bio, CymaBay, Madrigal, and NGM; and is a consultant for 89Bio, CymaBay, Madrigal, and NGM. NA reports serving on advisory boards for 89Bio, Gilead, Intercept, LG Chem, NGM, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Terns, and Zydus; is a speaker for AbbVie, Alexion, Echosens, Gilead, Intercept, Perspectum, and Simply Speaking; and has received research support from 89Bio, Akero, Albireo, Allergan, Axcella, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Corcept, Gilead, Galmed, Galectin, Genfit, Enanta, Enyo, Fibronostics, Hanmi, Hepagene, Inventiva, Madrigal, Merck, Metacrine, Northsea, Noom, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Poxel, and Zydus. MRB reports grant and research support from the National Institutes of Health (5U01-DK061713-19, 1R01CA249765-01) as well as Carmot, Corcept, CymaBay, Diabetes & Endocrinology Consultants, Madrigal, Metacrine, NGM, Pinnacle Clinical Research, Polarean Imaging, and Siemens Healthineers. MER reports consulting for Alnylam, Amgen, AMRA, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Centara, Coherus, Enanta, Galecto, Intercept, Madrigal, NGM, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Fractyl, Gelesis, Siemens, Thetis, Terns, Rivus, 3vBio (Sagimet), 89Bio, and Novartis. MSS reports consulting for Pfizer and serves on an advisory committee for AMRA. MK reports research grants from Medtronic, SARO, Pfizer, Dexcom, Abbott, Regenacy, Metacrine, Lumos, Ascendis, Sagimet, MannKind, Aeterna-Zentaris, 89Bio, Gilead, Senseonics, KOWA, Allergan, NGM, Tolerion, and Lilly, and is on an advisory board for Quest Diagnostics. ZHY reports grant and research support from Gilead, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cymabay, HighTide, Madrigal, NGM, Conatus, Novartis, Allergan, Intercept, and Novo Nordisk, and is a consultant for Gilead. MB reports grant support from the National Institutes of Health. SJB reports serving on a scientific advisory board for Altimmune, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Axcella, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Esperion, Novartis, Regeneron, and Sanofi, and is a consultant for Altimmune, Amgen, Madrigal, Novartis, Regeneron, and Sanofi. BB reports research support from Akero, Axcella, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Conatus, Cymabay, Enyo, Galectin, Genfit, Gilead, Hepion, Hightide, Intercept, Madrigal, NGM, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Northsea, Viking, AbbVie, Gynkotex, GlaxoSmithKline, Arena, Protagonist, Mirum, Eli Lilly, Ionis, and Poxel. PJR reports serving as speaker and adviser for Gilead Sciences and ViiV. PJT reports grant and research support from AbbVie, Allergan, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cara, Celgene, Cirius, Conatus, Cymabay, Dova, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Elobix, Enanta, Enyo, Exelixis, Gilead, HighTide, Intercept, Mallinckrodt, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sillajen, and Targ, and is a consultant for Mallinckrodt. MG, MK, CC, LM-K, WC, AMD, LL, and HDL report being employees and stockholders of NGM. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: In this study, our objective was to determine gender differences in the outcomes of patients with PLD undergoing liver (LT) or liver/kidney transplantation (SLK)., Methods: We analyzed the UNOS datasets of all adults who had transplanted for PLD between 1988 and 2018., Results: During the study period, 663 LT/SLK (51% LT only and 49% SLK) were done for PLD patients and of these 500 (75%) were in women. Women were younger (52.8 vs. 56.7 years, p < 0.001), had lower MELD at transplant (16.6 vs. 19.4, p < 0.001), had higher serum albumin (3.7 vs. 3.5, p < 0.001), and had a lower CTP class (p < 0.008). During the follow-up, 18% (n = 89) women and 29% (n = 47) men died (p = 0.002). Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival estimates showed similar survival rate for patients who had LT and SLK (p = 0.459), but survival rate was significantly higher for women compared to men (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that female gender (aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33-0.90) was associated with a lower mortality. Moreover, Karnofsky Performance Status was excellent for 70% of women and 55% of men (p = 0.03) after LT. Women had better survival whether they received liver or SLK. The era of transplant, whether they were transplanted with MELD exception points or whether they were on dialysis at the time of transplant, did not have an effect on the gender differences in outcomes., Conclusions: Women had 46% lower risk of mortality after adjusting for other covariates compared to men after LT/SLK for PLD., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Graft macrosteatosis can predispose to a higher risk of graft loss so we sought to redefine acceptable cutoffs for graft steatosis., Methods: Data of 26,103 donors who underwent liver transplantation (LT) between January 2004 and December 2018 from the UNOS-STAR database were utilized. A high-risk steatotic (HRS) graft and a low-risk steatotic (LRS) graft were defined as ≥20% and <20% macrosteatosis, respectively. High-risk steatotic grafts were further classified as grafts with 20-29% (G1S grafts), 30-39% (G2S grafts), and ≥40% steatosis (G3S grafts). Outcomes between groups were compared., Results: LRS grafts had excellent graft (93.3 and 87.7%) and overall survival (95.4 and 90.5%) at 90 days and 1 year. Compared to LRS grafts, G1S, G2S, and G3S grafts had worse graft and overall survival at 90 days and 1-year ( p <0.001). There was no difference in graft or overall survival of G1S or G3S grafts compared to G2S grafts until after adjustment in which G3S grafts were found to be associated with an increased risk of graft loss-aHR 1.27 (1.03-1.57), p = 0.02., Discussion: Liver grafts can be categorized into three categories: (1) <20% or "very low risk", (2) 20-39% or "low-to-moderate risk", and usually acceptable, and (3) ≥40% steatosis or "moderate-to-high risk"., How to Cite This Article: Da BL, Satiya J, Heda RP, et al . Outcomes after Liver Transplantation with Steatotic Grafts: Redefining Acceptable Cutoffs for Steatotic Grafts. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2022;12(Suppl 1):S5-S14., Competing Interests: Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None, (Copyright © 2022; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.)

Introduction and Objectives: Lower antibody (Ab) responses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination have been reported in liver transplant (LT) recipients and those with chronic liver diseases (CLD). The role of a booster dose in those with poor responses to initial vaccination is not well defined., Methods: In this prospective study, we determined antibody (Ab) response to spike protein after a booster dose in LT recipients and those with chronic liver diseases (CLD) with and without cirrhosis after they had a poor response to an initial standard regimen., Results: Of the 80 patients enrolled, 45 had LT, and 35 had CLD (18 with cirrhosis). A booster dose was given at a median of 138.5 days after the completion of the standard regimen. After the booster dose, 58 (73%, 31 LT, 27 CLD) had good response (≥250 U/mL), and 22 (28%, 14 LT, and 8 CLD) had poor response (7 undetectable and 15 with low Ab levels). No patient had any serious adverse events. The antibody responses were lower in those who had undetectable Ab (80 U/mL) than those who had low levels of Ab (0.80-249 U/mL) after the standard vaccination regimen (42% vs. 87%, p=0.0001). The antibody responses after homologous and heterologous booster doses were similar., Conclusions: We have shown that a booster dose will enhance Ab responses in LT recipients and those with CLD who had poor responses after an initial vaccine regimen., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest None, (Copyright © 2022 Fundación Clínica Médica Sur, A.C. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objective: Hypervolemic hyponatremia is a late complication of portal hypertension. Hyponatremia is associated with a higher mortality in hospitalized patients. In this study, we evaluated the risk factors for inhospital mortality and developed a mortality prediction model in patients with cirrhosis and hyponatremia., Methods: Using the national inpatient sample data for years 2016 and 2017, we identified cirrhotic patients hospitalized with ascites and hyponatremia (n = 9153). We identified independent risk factors of inhospital mortality and developed a prediction model in a training group and assessed its accuracy in a validation group. To enhance the clinical utility, we further stratified patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk mortality risk groups using cutoff points selected by decision tree analysis., Results: The inhospital mortality in our cohort was 10.2% (n = 846). Multivariable analysis showed that age at least 65 years, variceal bleeding, sepsis, coagulopathy, and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF defined as two or more organ failures) were independent risk factors for mortality. The prediction model using these five risk factors had an AUROC of 0.80 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.78-0.82] for the training data and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.80-0.86) for the validation data. The mortality risks in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were 4% (95% CI, 3-4), 29% (95% CI, 28-33), and 43% (95% CI, 37-50), respectively., Conclusion: We have developed a clinically meaningful inhospital prognostic model with excellent discrimination that will enable clinicians to risk stratify hospitalized patients with hyponatremia, ascites, and cirrhosis., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Video 1Submucosal nodule in the cecum. After submucosal injection, a circumferential incision of the mucosa surrounding the lesion is performed with DualKnife (Olympus America, Center Valley, Pa, USA). The fore-balloon of the double-balloon endoluminal interventional platform (DBEIP) is deployed and the edges of the circumferential incision are attached with 2 endoscopic clips to the long suture-loop mounted on the fore-balloon of the DBEIP. The fore-balloon is retracted in anal direction, pulling the lesion into the cecum. Careful endoscopic submucosal dissection is performed with DualKnife and HookKnife (Olympus America). Dissection is markedly facilitated by traction and continued until the entire appendix is pulled into the cecum. The tip of the appendix is separated from surrounding tissues, resulting in a full-thickness cecal wall defect. The suture-loop holding the resected appendix is cut with LoopCutter (Olympus America). The resected appendix is removed through DBEIP and the Overstitch endoscopic suturing device (Apollo Endosurgery, Austin, Tex, USA) is advanced into the cecum. The full-thickness defect in the cecal wall is completely closed with 2 continuous sutures. The final view demonstrates the entire resected appendix., (© 2022 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) with or without cirrhosis remain at risk of developing hepatic decompensation when infected with viral or bacterial pathogens. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) currently recommends vaccination in CLD against hepatitis A virus (HAV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), influenza, pneumococcus, herpes zoster, tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis, and SARS-CoV-2. Inactivated vaccines are preferred over live attenuated ones, especially in transplant recipients where live vaccines are contraindicated. As the severity of the liver disease progresses, vaccine efficacy declines, and therefore, vaccines should be ideally administered early in the disease course for optimal immune response. Despite the strong recommendations, overall vaccination coverage in CLD remains poor; however, it is encouraging to note that in recent years coverage against influenza and pneumococcus has shown some improvement. Inadequate access to healthcare, lack of information on vaccine safety, poor financial reimbursement for healthcare providers, and vaccine misinformation are often responsible for low immunization rates. This review summarizes the impact of vaccine-preventable illness in those with CLD, updated vaccine guidelines, seroconversion rates in the vaccinated, and barriers faced by healthcare professionals in immunizing those with liver disease., (© 2021 Indian National Association for Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Ascites and hyponatremia are important milestones of worsening portal hypertension in those with cirrhosis. The objective of our study was to evaluate the differences in clinical characteristics, resource utilization, and disposition of hospitalized cirrhotic patients with ascites with and without hyponatremia., Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was used to identify all adult hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of cirrhosis and ascites with or without hyponatremia from 2016 to 2017 using ICD-10 codes., Results: During the study period, 10,187 (7.6%) hospitalized patients with cirrhosis had ascites and hyponatremia and 34,555 (24.3%) had ascites but no hyponatremia. Elixhauser comorbidity score, excluding liver disease, was higher in hyponatremic patients (median 21 vs. 12, P  < 0.001). Acute kidney injury (50.3% vs. 32.8%, P < 0.001) and sepsis (16.8% vs. 11.8%, P  < 0.001) were more common in hyponatremic patients compared to those without hyponatremia. Similarly, acute respiratory failure, coagulopathy, hepatorenal syndrome, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, acute (on chronic) liver failure, and liver cancer were more common in hyponatremic patients. Hyponatremia patients had a higher number of inpatient procedures, longer (6 days vs. 4 days, P  < 0.001) hospital stay, and had higher hospital charges ($97,327 vs. $72,278, P  < 0.01) than those without hyponatremia. Inpatient mortality was 38% higher in hyponatremic patients (9.8% vs. 7.1%, P  < 0.001) compared to those without hyponatremia. Additionally, hyponatremic patients were less likely to have routine home discharges with self-care., Conclusion: In conclusion, using a large and diverse national cohort of unselected patients, we were able to show that hyponatremia in patients with cirrhosis and ascites is associated with poor clinical outcomes and increased resource utilization., (© 2021 Indian National Association for Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The prognosis of acute kidney disease (AKD), defined as a glomerular filtration rate of <60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 or a rise in serum creatinine (sCr) of <50% for <3 months, is not clearly known., Aim: To study the prevalence, predictive factors and clinical outcomes in hospitalized cirrhotic patients with AKD., Methods: The North American Consortium for the Study of End-Stage Liver Disease prospectively enrolled hospitalized decompensated cirrhotic patients. Patients were separated into those with normal renal function (controls or C), AKD or stage 1 AKI as their worst renal dysfunction per International Club of Ascites definition and compared. Parameters assessed included demographics, laboratory data, haemodynamics, renal and patient outcomes., Results: 1244 patients with cirrhosis and ascites (C: 704 or 57%; AKD: 176 or 14%; stage 1 AKI: 364 or 29%) with similar demographics were enrolled. AKD patients had similar baseline sCr but higher hospital admission in the previous 6 months, and higher peak sCr, compared to controls, with their peak sCr being lower than that in stage 1 AKI patients (all P < .0001). The in-hospital and 30-day survival for AKD patients were intermediary between that for controls and stage 1 AKI patients (96% vs 91% vs 86%, P < .0001). The strongest predictors for AKD development while in hospital were the presence of a second infection (OR: 2.44) and diabetes (OR: 1.53)., Conclusions: Patients with AKD had intermediate outcomes between stage 1 AKI and controls. AKD patients, especially those with diabetes and a second infection, need careful monitoring and prompt treatment for AKD to prevent negative outcomes., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background & Objectives: There are reports of worsening renal functions with sofosbuvir, but there are no comparative data of different direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) on serum creatinine. In this retrospective cohort analysis, we examined the treatment effect of two commonly used regimens, sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LDV) and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB), on serum creatinine., Methods: We included all patients treated with SOF/LDV (n = 825) and GLE/PIB (n = 116) between December 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018. An increase of serum creatinine ≥0.3 mg/dL was considered clinically significant. The change of creatinine values from pretreatment to posttreatment between two treatment groups was tested in unadjusted and adjusted generalized linear model, and risk factors associated with creatinine change were assessed. In addition, GLE/PIB-treated patients were matched 1:2 to SOF/LDV-treated patients using propensity scores, and then serum creatinine changes were compared., Results: The mean baseline creatinine was higher in the GLE/PIB group vs. SOF/LDV group (1.39 ± 1.86 vs. 0.91 ± 0.24, P  = 0.007). When compared to baseline, serum creatinine at posttreatment week 4 was significantly higher in SOF/LDV group (0.97 ± 0.4 vs.0.91 ± 0.24, P  < 0.001), but there was no significant change in the GLE/PIB group (1.41 ± 1.73 vs. 1.39 ± 1.86, P  = 0.52). Overall, there was no significant change in serum creatinine between posttreatment week 4 and week 24 ( P  = 0.6). Clinically significant increase in serum creatinine was seen in 6% (46/825) of SOF/LDV and 7% (8/116) of GLE/PIB ( P  = 0.6). The unadjusted and adjusted models indicated that the changes in creatinine from baseline to posttreatment week 4 and week 24 were not associated with the type of DAA combination., Conclusion: Treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection with both SOF/LDV and GLE/PIB regimens may result in an increase of creatinine, and 6-7% will have an increase in serum creatinine of ≥0.3 mg/dL. The increase in creatinine, however, is unrelated to the type of DAA combination., (© 2021 Indian National Association for Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: We have recently shown that the European Association for the Study of the Liver-Chronic Liver Failure Consortium (EASL-CLIF) criteria showed a better sensitivity to detect acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) with a better prognostic capability than the North American Consortium for the Study of End-Stage Liver Disease criteria., Aim: To simplify EASL-CLIF criteria for ease of use without sacrificing its sensitivity and prognostic capability., Methods: Using the United Network for Organ Sharing data (January 11, 2016, to August 31, 2020), we modified EASL-CLIF (mEACLF) criteria; the modified mEACLF criteria included six organ failures (OF) as in the original EASL-CLIF, but renal failure was defined as creatinine ≥ 2.35 mg/dL and coagulation failure was defined as international normalized ratio (INR) ≥ 2.0. The mEACLF grades (0, 1, 2, and ≥ 3) directly reflected the number of OF., Results: Of the 40357 patients, 14044 had one or more OF, and 9644 had ACLF grades 1-3 by EASL-CLIF criteria. By the mEACLF criteria, 15574 patients had one or more OF. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) for 30-d all-cause mortality by OF was 0.842 (95%CI: 0.831-0.853) for mEACLF and 0.835 (95%CI: 0.824-0.846) for EASL-CLIF ( P = 0.006), and AUROC for 30-d transplant-free mortality by OF was 0.859 (95%CI: 0.849-0.869) for mEACLF and 0.851 (95%CI: 0.840-0.861) for EASL-CLIF ( P = 0.001). The AUROC of 30-d all-cause mortality by ACLF grades was 0.842 (95%CI: 0.831-0.853) for mEACLF and 0.793 (95%CI: 0.781-0.806) for EASL-CLIF ( P < 0.0001). The AUROC of 30-d transplant-free mortality by ACLF was 0.859 (95%CI: 0.848-0.869) for mEACLF and 0.805 (95%CI: 0.793-0.817) for EASL-CLIF ( P < 0.0001)., Conclusion: Our study showed that EASL-CLIF criteria for ACLF grades could be simplified for ease of use without losing its prognostication capability and sensitivity., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: There are no conflicts of interest to report., (©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Currently, there are no approved medications to treat patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with fibrosis or cirrhosis. Although the management goal in these patients is weight reduction by 7-10% with lifestyle modifications, only less than 10% of patients achieve this target at 1-year, and fewer maintain the weight loss at 5 years. Bariatric surgery is an option that may be considered in those who fail to lose weight by lifestyle changes. Bariatric surgery has been shown to improve liver histology including fibrosis secondary to NASH, in addition to other benefits including an improvement or resolution of type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, and a reduction of cardiovascular morbidity or mortality. There are no guidelines of bariatric surgery indications for the management of NASH. The purpose of this review is to critically appraise the current knowledge of the role of bariatric surgery and the potential mechanisms for its perceived benefits in the management of patients with NASH-related liver disease., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background & Aims: Liver transplant (LT) recipients or other immunocompromised patients were not included in the registration trials studying the efficacy of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Although the clinical efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in immunocompromised patients is unknown, many societies have recommended vaccination of this highly vulnerable patient population., Methods: In this prospective study, we determined antibody responses to spike protein, 4 weeks after the 2 nd dose of mRNA vaccines or after the single dose of Johnson & Johnson vaccine, in LT recipients and those with chronic liver disease (CLD) with and without cirrhosis., Results: Of the 233 patients enrolled so far, 62 were LT recipients, 79 had cirrhosis (10 decompensated) and 92 had CLD without cirrhosis. Antibody titers were defined as undetectable (<0.40 U/ml), suboptimal (0.40-250 U/ml) and adequate (>250 U/ml). Of the 62 patients who had LT, antibody levels were undetectable in 11 patients and suboptimal (median titer 17.6, range 0.47-212 U/ml) in 27 patients. Among 79 patients with cirrhosis, 3 had undetectable antibody levels and 15 had suboptimal (median titer 41.3, range 0.49-221 U/L) antibody responses. Of the 92 patients without cirrhosis, 4 had undetectable antibody levels and 19 had suboptimal (median titer 95.5, range 4.9-234 U/L) antibody responses. Liver transplantation, use of 2 or more immunosuppression medications and vaccination with a single dose of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine were associated with poor immune response on multivariable analysis. No patient had any serious adverse events., Conclusions: Poor antibody responses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were seen in 61% of LT recipients and 24% of those with CLD., Lay Summary: The clinical efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in immunocompromised patients is unknown. We performed a prospective study to evaluate immune responses to COVID-19 vaccines (Moderna, Pfizer or Johnson & Johnson) in 62 liver transplant recipients, 79 patients with cirrhosis and 92 with chronic liver diseases without cirrhosis. We found that 17.8% of liver transplant recipients, 3.8% of those with cirrhosis and 4.3% of those with chronic liver diseases without cirrhosis had undetectable antibody levels. In total, 61.3% of liver transplant recipients and 24% of those with chronic liver diseases (with or without cirrhosis) had poor antibody responses (undetectable or suboptimal). Liver transplantation, use of immunosuppressive medications and vaccination with a single dose of Johnson & Johnson vaccine were associated with poor antibody responses when adjusted for other factors., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest that pertain to this work. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2021 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and fibrosis stage ≥2 comprise a target population for pharmacotherapy. Liver biopsy, the reference standard for identifying this population, requires complete and accurate assessment of steatohepatitis and fibrosis. Aims To investigate the completeness of real-world NASH-related pathology reports, assess concordance between site pathologists and central expert interpretation of the histologic elements of NASH, and determine concordance between biopsy-diagnosed NASH and a pragmatic clinical definition of NASH., Methods: Liver pathology reports from 222 patients across 38 TARGET-NASH sites were analysed for documentation of the histologic features of NASH. Biopsy slides were over-read by a blinded central expert pathologist. Concordance of histologic scores and interpretation was assessed. Histologic concordance with a clinical definition of NASH was determined. TARGET-NASH clinically defined NASH: elevated ALT, hepatic steatosis on biopsy or imaging and ≥1 of the following: BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 , type 2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidaemia., Results: Documentation of steatosis, lobular inflammation, portal inflammation and ballooning were missing from 21%, 35%, 46% and 40% of reports, respectively. There was slight-to-fair concordance (weighted kappa 0.01-0.35) between site and central pathologists for inflammatory features, and moderate concordance (weighted kappa 0.56-0.57) for fibrosis staging. Clinical definition of NASH was 75%-91% concordant (94%-95% sensitive) with biopsy-diagnosed NASH., Conclusions: There is substantial variability in reporting and grading NASH and fibrosis staging in clinical practice. This heterogeneity may adversely impact patient assessment and translation of practice guidelines into reality. The TARGET-NASH pragmatic clinical definition may serve as a valuable tool to accurately identify NASH patients in clinical practice., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) carries a poor prognosis unless liver transplantation is offered. We present risk factors associated with proceeding with liver transplantation in patients with ACLF., Methods: A retrospective review of all patients with ACLF who presented to a single transplant center between January 2016 and December 2017 was performed. We compared patients who were transplanted with patients who were not., Results: During the study period, 144 patients with ACLF were identified, 86 patients (59.7%) were transplanted, and 58 were not. The transplanted patients had a lower number of failed organs (4 versus 5, P < 0.001) and lower incidence of ACLF grade 3 (76.7% versus 94.8%, P = 0.014) compared with nontransplanted patients. Liver transplantation offered a 1-y survival of 86% as compared to 12% in the nontransplanted group. Hospital charges were significantly higher among transplanted patients as compared with the nontransplanted patients ($227 886 versus $88 900, P < 0.001). Elevated serum lactate was a risk factor in not offering liver transplantation in ACLF patients., Conclusions: In appropriately selected patients with ACLF, liver transplantation is feasible and can provide above 86% 1-y patient survival even in grade 3 ACLF., Competing Interests: The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background/objective: Our objective was to assess the impact of mass mailing and the inclusion of Best Practice Advisory (BPA) "Pop-Up" tool in the electronic medical record (EMR) on HCV screening rates., Methods: Between June 2015 and March 2020, two interventions were developed for primary care physicians (PCP). An educational letter along with a blood requisition form, signed on behalf of the PCPs, was sent to patients. We also developed a BPA "Pop-Up" screening tool to alert PCPs to order HCV screening tests on patients with no previous screening. Data were collected and analyzed prospectively., Results: When we started the screening program in June 2015, 33,736 baby boomers were eligible for screening, and the hospital system added an additional 26,027 baby boomers between June 2015 and March 2020. Of the 89 primary care providers employed by the hospital, 75 agreed to participate at different time periods. We screened 23,291 (43.5%) of 53,526 eligible patients during study period. Of these, 399 (1.7%) had HCV antibody, but HCV RNA was positive in only 195 (1%). HCV antibody positivity rates were higher in men, blacks, and in 1951-1960 birth cohorts. Spontaneous clearance rates appeared to be lower in men (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39-0.90, P  = 0.015) and in blacks (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.20-0.50, P < 0.001)., Conclusion: Although a formal screening program increased screening rates for HCV among baby boomers, about 50% of baby boomers remained unscreened. In this community screening program, we found that men and blacks are less likely to have spontaneous HCV clearance., (© 2021 Indian National Association for Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: There is no consensus on the best definition for acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). In this study, we compared the prevalence and 30-day all-cause and transplant-free mortality of patients with ACLF identified by European Association for the Study of the Liver-Chronic Liver Failure Consortium (EASL-CLIF) and North American Consortium for the Study of End-stage Liver Disease (NACSELD) criteria., Methods: We performed this comparative analysis using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data from January 11, 2016 to August 31, 2020., Results: A total of 10,198 (21%) adult patients had EASL-CLIF ACLF grade 1-3, but of these only 15.3% had ACLF by NACSELD. Of the 2,562 with EASL-CLIF ACLF grade 3, only 48.8% had NACSELD-ACLF, 16.8% had no organ failure (OF) and 34.4% had 1 OF. The 30-day all-cause mortality was 1.5%, 7.7%, 13.3% and 25.8% for EASL-CLIF grade 0-3, respectively, and it was 15.4% and 28.1% in those without and with NACSELD-ACLF. When EASL-CLIF grade 3 patients were stratified by NACSELD OF, the mortality ranged from 18.6% with no OF to 41.0% with 4 OFs. The 30-day transplant-free mortality in those with no OF by NACSELD was 2.7%, but when the same group is stratified by EASL-CLIF grades 0-3, the mortality rates were 1.5%, 10.5%, 43.5% and 86%, respectively; the mortality rates ranged from 3.0% to 75.7% in those with 1 OF by NACSELD., Conclusions: There is a clear discordance in the prevalence and 30-day mortality rates of patients with ACLF identified by the EASL-CLIF and NACSELD criteria. EASL-CLIF criteria have a better sensitivity to detect ACLF and have a better prognostic capability., Lay Summary: There is no consensus on the definition of acute-on-chronic liver failure. European (EASL-CLIF) and North American (NACSELD) consortia have each proposed a commonly used definition. In this study, we compared the prevalence and short-term (30-day) mortality based on these definitions. Using a very large data set, we observed that there was a significant discordance in the prevalence and mortality based on these criteria. EASL-CLIF criteria appeared to be more sensitive to identify acute-on-chronic liver failure, and were better at predicting all-cause and short-term mortality., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest that pertain to this work. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2021 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Alkaline phosphatase (AP) is a membrane bound enzyme and when it is elevated in blood, it is mostly due to either hepatobiliary or bone diseases. We report isolated intestinal hyperphosphatasemia (IAP) in two sisters. Both sisters presented with identical trends of isolated AP elevation. Both underwent extensive workup for liver diseases including cholangiograms, and none was identified. Subsequent isoenzyme electrophoresis showed that 45%-56% of the elevated AP was due to IAP. This elevation of the intestinal AP is consistent with a rare hereditary biochemical abnormality, benign familial intestinal hyperphosphatemia. This condition should be considered in the differential diagnosis of otherwise isolated serum AP levels to avoid unnecessary investigations., (© 2020 Indian National Association for Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The worldwide pandemic of COVID-19, caused by the virus SARS-CoV-2, continues to cause significant morbidity and mortality in both low- and high-income countries. Although COVID-19 is predominantly a respiratory illness, other systems including gastrointestinal (GI) system and liver may be involved because of the ubiquitous nature of ACE-2 receptors in various cell lines that SARS-CoV-2 utilizes to enter host cells. It appears that GI symptoms and liver enzyme abnormalities are common in COVID-19. The involvement of the GI tract and liver correlates with the severity of disease. A minority (10-20%) of patients with COVID-19 may also present initially with only GI complaints. The most common GI symptoms are anorexia, loss of smell, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Viral RNA can be detected in stool in up to 50% of patients, sometimes even after pharyngeal clearance, but it is unclear whether fecal-oral transmission occurs. Liver enzymes are elevated, usually mild (2-3 times), in a substantial proportion of patients. There are many confounding factors that could cause liver enzyme abnormalities including medications, sepsis, and hypoxia. Although infection rates in those with preexisting liver disease are similar to that of general population, once infected, patients with liver disease are more likely to have a more severe disease and a higher mortality. There is a paucity of objective data on the optimal preventive or management strategies, but few recommendations for GI physicians based on circumstantial evidence are discussed., (© 2020. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: A model that can predict short-term mortality in patients with the Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) with a high degree of accuracy is currently lacking. The primary objective of our study was to develop an easy-to-use in-hospital mortality prediction model in patients with BCS using easily available clinical variables., Methods: Data were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample to identify all adult patients with a listed diagnosis of BCS from 2008 to 2017 using ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes. After identifying independent risk factors of in-hospital mortality, we developed a prediction model using logistic regression analysis. The model was built and validated in a training and a validation data set, respectively. Using the model, we risk stratified patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups., Results: Between 2008 and 2017, we identified a total of 5,306 (weighted sample size 26,110) discharge diagnosis of patients with BCS, with an overall in-hospital mortality of 7.14%. The independent risk factors that predicted mortality were age of 50 years or older, ascites, sepsis, acute respiratory failure, acute liver failure, hepatorenal syndrome, and cancers. The mortality prediction model that incorporated these risk factors had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87 (95% CI 0.85-0.95) for the training data and 0.89 (95% CI 0.86-0.92) for the validation data. Patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk scores had a predicted in-patient mortality of 4%, 30%, and 66%, respectively., Discussion: Using a national administrative database, we developed a reliable in-patient mortality prediction model with an excellent accuracy. The model was able to risk stratify patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups., (Copyright © 2021 by The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Background: The Budd Chiari syndrome (BCS) is a rare and potentially fatal disease, but there is a paucity of data on the in- hospital mortality as well its economic burden on the health care system., Aim: To evaluate trends in mortality, length of hospital stays and resource utilization among inpatients with BCS., Methods: Data on all adult patients with a diagnosis of BCS were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 1998 to 2017. To make inferences regarding the national estimates for the total number of BCS discharges across the study period, sample weights were applied to each admission per recommendations from the NIS., Results: During the study period, there were 3591 (8.73%) in-patient deaths. The overall in-hospital mortality rates among BCS patients decreased from 18% in 1998 to 8% in 2017; the mortality decreased by 4.41% ( P < 0.0001) every year. On multivariate analysis, older age, higher comorbidity score, acute liver failure, acute kidney injury, acute respiratory failure, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome, inferior vena cava thrombosis, intestinal infarct, sepsis/septic shock and cancer were associated increased risk of mortality. The average of length of stay was 8.8 d and it consistently decreased by 2.04% (95%CI: -2.67%, -1.41%, P < 0.001) from 12.7 d in 1998 to 7.6 d in 2017.The average total charges after adjusted for Medical Care Consumers Price Index to 2017 dollars during the time period was $94440 and the annual percentage change increased by 1.15% (95%CI: 0.35%, 1.96%, P = 0.005) from $95515 in 1998 to $103850 in 2017., Conclusion: The in-hospital mortality rate for patients admitted with BCS in the United States has reduced between 1998 and 2017 and this may a reflection of better management of these patients., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: No conflict of interest., (©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)