Search

Nodular secondary syphilis is an uncommon variant of secondary syphilis. We identified three cases of nodular secondary syphilis at our institution. The first patient presented with a diffuse nodular rash that included his scrotum and penis. The second patient had disseminated skin-colored nodules with serosanguinous crust on his face, trunk, and extremities. The third patient had a pruritic papular and nodular rash with overlying crust. All three patients had a reactive rapid plasma reagin and tested positive for fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption. All were eventually confirmed to be human immunodeficiency virus-positive. Histopathological examination demonstrated inflammatory infiltrate in the dermis composed of lymphocytes, histiocytes, and plasma cells, and treponemal staining highlighted spirochetes in the dermis. The patients were successfully treated with intramuscular penicillin benzathine G. Physicians should be aware of nodular syphilis as a less common cutaneous manifestation of secondary syphilis. Prompt diagnosis of secondary syphilis can expedite resolution of the infection and avoid progression to tertiary syphilis.

Twenty-one patients on mechanical ventilators for greater than 48 hours who had new localized infiltrates were evaluated using a quantitative culture technique of the involved lung compared to the non-involved lung. Based on the clinical course, response to antibiotics, or subsequent analysis of pathologic specimens, eight patients were felt to have acute bacterial pneumonia, while the remaining 13 were felt to have an alternative cause of their infiltrate. Cultures of the protected brush specimen of the involved lung in all eight cases of bacterial pneumonia had one or more organisms grown at a greater than 100 colony forming units (cfu) per ml while only one of the 13 cases of nonpneumonia had a culture from the involved area having greater than 100 cfu per ml (p <0.001). The non-involved area always grew fewer organisms than the involved area, and in 16 cases, there was no growth from the specimen obtained from the noninvolved area.

To determine whether bronchial reactivity is augmented soon after an allergen-induced immediate asthmatic response, we compared reactivity to histamine before and immediately upon resolution of the immediate asthmatic response in seven subjects with mild asthma who were known to develop dual asthmatic responses after inhalation of Kentucky bluegrass allergen. Using a body plethysmograph and quiet breathing technique, specific airway resistance (SRaw) and reactivity to aerosol histamine were assessed on two days prior to allergenic challenge. The dose of histamine that doubled SRaw (PC200His) was determined by interpolation from histamine dose-reponse curves. On the day of allergenic challenge, each subject inhaled a concentration that was sufficient to induce a dual asthmatic response. Upon resolution of the immediate asthmatic response (45 to 105 minutes) after allergen, the PC200His in all cases had decreased more than 50 percent of its original value (PC200His for the group was 0.29 ±1.42 mg/ml [mean ± SE], compared to 0.84 ±1.23 mg/ml initially). Seven or more days after the allergen, each subject had a PC200His comparable to original values. Our data indicate that airway reactivity in dual-responding asthmatic subjects markedly increases soon after the immediate asthmatic response and much before the late asthmatic response manifests clinically. Whether this early increase in bronchial reactivity is a putative requirement for, or shares common characteristics with the late asthmatic response requires further study.