Search

Introduction: Early life growth restriction significantly increases the risk of adulthood physical inactivity and thereby chronic disease incidence. Improvements in motor skill acquisition could result in greater physical activity engagement in the growth-restricted population, thus reducing chronic disease risk. The purpose of this study was to implement an early life motor training intervention to improve physical activity engagement in control and growth-restricted mice. Methods: Mice were growth restricted in early life utilizing a validated nutritive model or remained fully nourished in early life as a control. All mice were tested throughout early life for various components of motor skill acquisition. On postnatal day 10,mice were randomly assigned to engage in an early life motor skill intervention daily until postnatal day 21 or remained as a sedentary control. All mice were given access to an in-cage running wheel from postnatal days 45-70. Results: Growth-restricted group (PGR) mice had impaired trunk and postural control, coordination/vestibular development, and hindlimb strength in early life compared with control mice. There were no differences in wheel running behavior between the trained and sedentary mice, although control mice ran at a faster average speed compared with PGR mice. Control female mice ran more than PGR female mice during the week 2 dark cycle. Conclusions: Early life growth restriction reduced motor skill attainment throughout early life, which may be associated with reduced ability to engage in physical activity in adulthood. The early life motor skill intervention did not elicit changes in body weight or physical activity engagement in control or PGR mice, indicating that a more intense/different intervention specifically targeting skeletal muscle may be necessary to counteract the detrimental effects of early life growth restriction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Although the proximal tibia is a common site for intraosseous (IO) line placement in pediatric patients, previously published data indicate high malposition rates in infants and children at this location. Although distal femur IO lines generally demonstrate higher flow rates than those at the proximal tibia, to date, there have been no published studies assessing distal femur IO access in pediatric patients. Thus, we aimed to compare the success rates of pediatric IO line insertion attempts between the proximal tibia and the distal femur in a prehospital setting., Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of prehospital pediatric patients who underwent at least one IO line placement attempt by Palm Beach County Fire Rescue from May 2015 to January 2024. We excluded records lacking specific documentation of IO attempt location. We compared the unadjusted success rates of distal femur to proximal tibia, and we also compared success rates after propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression. Secondarily, we assessed the prehospital complication rate of the IO lines at each anatomical site., Results: We identified 163 pediatric patients who had an IO attempt and were eligible for analysis. Median age was 1.9 years (IQR: 0.46 to 4.2 years). Among those 163 patients, there were 234 vascular access attempts, including 82 IO attempts at the distal femur and 72 at the proximal tibia. The unadjusted success rate of distal femur attempts was 89.0%, compared to 84.7% for proximal tibia attempts, a difference of 4.3% (95% CI -6.4 to 15.0%). After propensity score matching, we found an adjusted odds ratio of 2.0 (95% CI 0.66 to 6.8), favoring the distal femur for successful placement. Prehospital complication rates were similar for distal femur (5.5%) and proximal tibia (4.9%)., Conclusions: This retrospective analysis of pediatric patients in a prehospital setting suggests that IO line placement at the distal femur might offer a marginally higher success rate compared to the proximal tibia. Despite not reaching statistical significance, these findings support the consideration of distal femur as a viable option for IO placement in the pediatric population.