Search

Purpose: Asian, Black, and Hispanic men are underrepresented in prostate cancer (PCa) clinical trials. Few novel prostate cancer biomarkers have been validated in diverse cohorts. We aimed to determine if Stockholm3 can improve prostate cancer detection in a diverse cohort., Methods: An observational prospective multicentered (17 sites) clinical trial (2019-2023), supplemented by prospectively recruited participants (2008-2020) in a urology clinic setting included men with suspicion of PCa and underwent prostate biopsy. Before biopsy, sample was collected for measurement of the Stockholm3 risk score. Parameters include prostate-specific antigen (PSA), free PSA, KLK2, GDF15, PSP94, germline risk (single-nucleotide polymorphisms), age, family history, and previous negative biopsy. The primary endpoint was detection of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade ≥2 cancer (clinically significant PCa, csPC). The two primary aims were to (1) demonstrate noninferior sensitivity (0.8 lower bound 95% CI noninferiority margin) in detecting csPC using Stockholm3 compared with PSA (relative sensitivity) and (2) demonstrate superior specificity by reducing biopsies with benign results or low-grade cancers (relative specificity)., Results: A total of 2,129 biopsied participants were included: Asian (16%, 350), Black or African American (Black; 24%, 505), Hispanic or Latino and White (Hispanic; 14%, 305), and non-Hispanic or non-Latino and White (White; 46%, 969). Overall, Stockholm3 showed noninferior sensitivity compared with PSA ≥4 ng/mL (relative sensitivity: 0.95 [95% CI, 0.92 to 0.99]) and nearly three times higher specificity (relative specificity: 2.91 [95% CI, 2.63 to 3.22]). Results were consistent across racial and ethnic subgroups: noninferior sensitivity (0.91-0.98) and superior specificity (2.51-4.70). Compared with PSA, Stockholm3 could reduce benign and ISUP 1 biopsies by 45% overall and between 42% and 52% across racial and ethnic subgroups., Conclusion: In a substantially diverse population, Stockholm3 significantly reduces unnecessary prostate biopsies while maintaining a similar sensitivity to PSA in detecting csPC.

Introduction: Prostate cancer continues to be the second leading cause of cancer related mortality in men within the United States. Despite a consistent decline in prostate cancer mortality over the past two decades, the prognosis for men with metastatic prostate cancer remains poor with no curative therapies. In this article, we review the recently approved and emerging therapeutics for patients with castrate resistant prostate cancer., Materials and Methods: An advanced search was conducted on the clinicaltrials.gov database, using search terms "metastatic prostate cancer", and limiting results to phase II-IV clinical trials. Clinically relevant emerging therapeutics were selected and a Medline search for supporting documents was performed. An emphasis was placed on newly approved and promising new therapeutics., Results: A total of four Food and Drug Administration approved medications and eight investigational agents were chosen for review. The background and role of these therapeutics in the treatment of prostate cancer treatment is discussed., Conclusions: The past few years have yielded a near exponential increase in treatments for metastatic prostate cancer, many of which have a unique mechanism of action. The estimated median survival for patients with metastatic prostate cancer remains dynamic as we begin to integrate these therapeutics into clinical practice and determine the optimal sequence and timing of treatment.