Search

To report outcomes of urgent juxtarenal/pararenal aneurysms (J/P-AAAs) managed by off-the-shelf multibranched thoracoabdominal endografts (Cook, T-branch). In this observational, multicenter, retrospective study, patients with J/P-AAAs treated by urgent endovascular repair by T-branch in 23 European aortic centers, from 2013 to 2023, were analyzed. Contained J/P-AAAs rupture, presence of related symptoms, and aneurysm diameter of >70 mm were considered as indication for urgent repair. Technical success (TS), spinal cord ischemia (SCI), and 30-day/hospital mortality were assessed as early outcomes. Survival, freedom from reinterventions, and target artery instability (TAI) were evaluated during follow-up. Overall, 197 patients (J-AAAs, n = 64 [33%]; P-AAAs, n = 95 [48%]; previous failed endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), n = 38 [19%]) were analyzed. The mean age and aneurysm diameter was 75 ± 8 years and 76 ± 4 mm, respectively. The American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 3 and 4 in 118 (60%) and 79 (40%) patients. Rupture, symptoms, and diameter of >70 mm were present in 51 (26%), 110 (56%), and 53 (27%) patients, respectively. An adjunctive proximal thoracic endograft was used in 28 cases (14%). The mean aortic coverage between the upper portion of the endograft and the lowest renal artery was 154 ± 49 mm. Single-stage repair and cerebrospinal fluid drainage were reported in 144 (73%) and 53 (27%) cases, respectively. TS was achieved in 182 (92%) cases (rupture, 84% vs no rupture, 95%; P =.02). Failures consist of TA loss (11 [6%]: renal artery, 9; celiac trunk, 2), type I to III endoleaks (2 [1%]), and 24-h mortality (2 [1%]). Rupture was a risk factor for technical failure (P =.02; odds ratio [OR], 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-12.1). Overall, 15 patients (8%) had persistent SCI (rupture, 14% vs no rupture, 5%) with 11 (6%) , of paraplegia (rupture, 10% vs no rupture, 5%; P =.001). Rupture (P =.04; OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.1-8.9) and adjunctive proximal thoracic endograft (P =.01; OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.3-12.9) were risk-factors for SCI. Twenty-two patients (11%) died within 30 days or during a prolonged hospitalization. Previous failed EVAR (P =.04; OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.1-12.3), paraplegia (P <.001; OR, 9.9; 95% CI, 1.6-62.2) and postoperative mesenteric complications (P =.03; OR, 10.4; 95% CI, 1.2-93.3), as well as cardiac (P =.03; OR, 8.2; 95% CI, 2.0-33.0) and respiratory (P <.001; OR, 10.1; 95% CI, 2.9-35.2) morbidities were associated with 30-day/hospital mortality. The mean follow-up was 19 ± 5 months. The estimated 3-year survival and freedom from reinterventions was 58% and 77%, respectively. TAI occurred in 27 patients (14%) (occlusion, 15; endoleak, 14) with an estimated 3-year freedom from TAI of 72%. Urgent repair of J/P-AAAs by T-branch is feasible and effective with satisfactory TS and 30-day/hospital mortality in high-risk patients. However, extensive aortic coverage is necessary, leading to a non-negligible SCI rate, especially in case of aortic rupture or when adjunctive thoracic endografts are necessary. Previous failed EVAR and postoperative mesenteric complications, as well as cardiac and respiratory morbidities were associated with 30-day/hospital mortality and should be subjected to more research for the purposes of improving outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to report the outcomes of endovascular urgent thoracoabdominal aortic (TAAA) repair, using an off-the-shelf preloaded inner branch device (E-nside; Artivion). Data from a physician-initiated national multicenter registry, including patients treated with E-nside endograft (INBREED) were prospectively collected (2020-2024); only urgent cases were included in this study. Primary outcomes were technical success and mortality at 30 days. Secondary outcomes were spinal cord ischemia rate, stroke rate, major adverse events (MAE) as also branch instability at 12 months. Of 185 patients enrolled in the INBREED, 64 (34.5%) were treated in a urgent setting and were included in the study. Reason for urgent repair was presence of aneurysm-related symptoms in 31 patients (48.4%), a contained rupture in eight (12.5%), and a large aneurysm >80 mm in 25 (39.1%). Extent of repair was I to III in 32 patients (50%) and IV in 32 (50%); 18 (28%) had a narrow (<25 mm) paravisceral aortic lumen. An adjunctive proximal thoracic endograft was deployed in 29 patients (45.3%); a distal bifurcated abdominal endograft was used in 33 (51.5%). Two hundred forty-nine target vessels (97.2%) were successfully incorporated through an inner branch from an upper arm (81.2%) or femoral (18.8%) access. A balloon expandable stent was used in 184 (75.7%) target vessels, a self-expandable stent in 59 (24.3%). Mean time for target vessel bridging was 39.9 ± 28.4 minutes per target vessel. Thirty-day cumulative major adverse event (MAE) rate was 28%, and mortality occurred in five patients (9.1%). There was one postoperative stroke (1.6%), and the spinal cord ischemia (SCI) rate was 8% (n = 5). For the 249 target vessels successfully incorporated through an inner branch, 1-year freedom from target vessel instability was 93% ± 3% after 1 year. The E-nside represents a valid solution for the urgent treatment of TAAAs, including symptomatic and ruptured TAAAs, as well as large asymptomatic TAAAs that cannot wait for a custom-made device. The preloaded inner branches and available proximal and distal graft diameters might be useful in urgent settings and provided satisfactory early and 1-year results, in terms of both endograft and target vessel stability. Further studies are required to assess the clinical role of E-nside for urgent TAAA repair. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Resumen: Los aneurismas de la aorta toracoabdominal constituyen un reto en cirugía cardiovascular por la complejidad de la patología, agresividad del tratamiento quirúrgico y comorbilidades de los pacientes. Su prevalencia, real y detectada, ha aumentado debido a una creciente esperanza de vida, la mejora del diagnóstico y mayor concienciación de médicos y pacientes. Pueden complicarse por disección o rotura, y la mitad de las muertes se deben a la rotura, incluso con diámetros inferiores a 6 cm. El objetivo terapéutico es reducir complicaciones como disección, rotura o muerte de causa aórtica. La decisión quirúrgica requiere una ponderación cuidadosa de factores anatómicos y de riesgo de eventos futuros frente a los riesgos operatorios. La cirugía abierta sustituye el aneurisma por un injerto anastomosado a aorta adyacente sana, mientras que la reparación endovascular utiliza endoprótesis vasculares para excluir el flujo sanguíneo del saco aneurismático. La mortalidad y morbilidad de la reparación quirúrgica abierta son elevadas, especialmente en pacientes con comorbilidades, e incluyen isquemia medular y daño renal. El tratamiento endovascular se desarrolló como una alternativa menos invasiva a la cirugía abierta, con resultados prometedores en la reducción de la mortalidad hospitalaria, pero su uso sigue siendo experimental. La elección del tratamiento requiere una evaluación multidisciplinar del perfil de riesgo del paciente y de las características anatómicas del aneurisma. Recientemente se ha propuesto un tratamiento híbrido, que combina la reparación endovascular torácica con la cirugía abdominal abierta, pero la experiencia es aún limitada y no hay pruebas sólidas de que mejore los resultados. Abstract: Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms remain a challenge in cardiovascular surgery due to the complexity of the pathology, the invasiveness of surgical treatment required and common patient comorbidities. The prevalence, true and detected, of these aneurysms has increased due to increased life expectancy, improved diagnosis, and greater physician and patient awareness. They can trigger dissection or rupture, and half of all deaths are due to aortic rupture, even in aneurysms with diameters under 6 cm. The goal of treatment is to reduce the risk of adverse aortic events, such as dissection, rupture, or aortic-related death. The timing of intervention requires careful evaluation of anatomic and risk factors for future events versus operative risks. Open surgery aims to replace the aneurysmal thoracoabdominal aortic segment with a prosthetic graft anastomosed to adjacent non-aneurysmal aortic tissues, whereas endovascular repair uses stent-grafts to exclude blood flow from the aneurysmal sac. The morbidity and mortality of open surgical repair are high, especially in patients with comorbidities, and include spinal cord ischemia and renal damage. Endovascular treatment has been developed as a less invasive alternative to open surgery, with promising results in reducing hospital mortality, but its use remains experimental. The choice of treatment requires a multidisciplinary assessment of the patient's risk factors and the anatomical characteristics of the aneurysm. Hybrid treatment, combining thoracic endovascular repair with (simultaneous or deferred) open abdominal surgery, has recently been proposed, but there is still limited experience and no robust evidence for improved outcomes.

To present a single-center prospective study of 126 consecutively treated patients who underwent endovascular repair of a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm with the physician-modified, nonanatomic-based Unitary Manifold (UM) device. Data were collected from 126 consecutive all-comer patients treated with the physician-modified, nonanatomic-based UM from 2015 to 2023. Treatment was performed at a single center by a single physician under a Physician Sponsored Investigation Exemption G140207. The UM was indicated for repair of all Crawford extents including juxtarenal, pararenal, and short-neck infrarenal aneurysms (<10 mm) in 126 consecutive patients. Patients were not excluded from the study based on presentation, extent of aneurysm or dissection, or history of a spinal cord event. Patients with a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm were categorized by Crawford classification: types I and V (3.3%, n = 4), type II (3.3%, n = 4), type III (1%, n = 1), and type IV (93.3%, n = 117). The type IV classification patients were further categorized with 33 (28.2%) true type IV, 68 (58.1%) pararenal or infrarenal, and 16 (13.7%) with dissection. Technical success was 99.2% (n = 125). The most common major adverse event within both 30 days and 365 days of all patients was respiratory failure (11.9%, n = 15, and 13.5%, n = 17, respectively). One patient (0.8%) experienced persistent paraplegia at 365 days. Reintervention for patients at 365 days was 5.6% (n = 7). Of the 444 branches stented, the primary patency rate was remarkably high as only three patients (2.4%) required reintervention due to loss of limb patency within 365 days. Aneurysm enlargement (≥5 mm) occurred in 1.6% (n = 2) patients, and no patients experienced aneurysm rupture. No patients underwent conversion to open repair. The aneurysm-related mortality at 365 days for all patients was 4.0% (n = 5), whereas all-cause mortality was 16.7% (n = 21). Physician-modified endograft device integrity failure was not observed in any patient. The UM device demonstrated remarkable technical surgical success, treatment success, and device patency rates with very reasonable major adverse events and reintervention rates. This study is the most representative example of the general population in comparison with other studies of off-the-shelf devices, with 126 consecutive all-comer patients with diverse pathologies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aortic dissection is common in patients undergoing open surgical repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). Most often, dissection is chronic and is associated with progressive aortic dilatation. Because contemporary outcomes in chronic dissection are not clearly understood, we compared patient characteristics and outcomes after open TAAA repair between patients with chronic dissection and those with non-dissection aneurysm. We retrospectively analyzed data from 3470 open TAAA repairs performed in a single practice. Operations were for non-dissection aneurysm in 2351 (67.8%) and chronic dissection in 1119 (32.2%). Outcomes included operative mortality and adverse events, a composite variable comprising operative death and persistent (present at discharge) stroke, paraplegia, paraparesis, and renal failure necessitating dialysis. Logistic regression identified predictors of operative mortality and adverse events. Time-to-event analyses examined survival, death, repair failure, subsequent progressive repair, and survival free of failure or subsequent repair. Compared with patients with non-dissection aneurysm, those with chronic dissection were younger, had fewer atherosclerotic risk factors, and were more likely to have heritable thoracic aortic disease and undergo extent II repair. The operative mortality rate was 8.5% (n = 296) overall and was higher in non-dissection aneurysm patients (n = 217; 9.2%) than in chronic dissection patients (n = 79; 7.1%; P =.03). Adverse events were less frequent (P =.01) in patients with chronic dissection (n = 145; 13.0%), 22 (2.0%) of whom had persistent paraplegia. Chronic dissection was not predictive of operative mortality (P =.5) or adverse events (P =.6). Operative mortality and adverse events, respectively, were independently predicted by emergency repair (odds ratio [OR], 3.46 and 2.87), chronic kidney disease (OR, 1.74 and 1.81), extent II TAAA repair (OR, 1.44 and 1.73), increasing age (OR, 1.04/year and 1.04/year), and increasing aortic cross-clamp time (OR, 1.02/minutes and 1.02/minutes). Patients with chronic dissection had lower 10-year unadjusted mortality (42% vs 69%) but more frequent repair failure (5% vs 3%) and subsequent repair for progressive aortic disease (11% vs 5%) than patients with non-dissection aneurysm (P <.001); these differences were no longer statistically significant after adjustment. Outcomes of open TAAA repair vary by aortic disease type. Emergency repairs and atherosclerotic diseases most commonly occur in patients with non-dissection aneurysm and independently predict operative mortality. Repair of chronic dissection is associated with low rates of adverse events, including operative mortality and persistent paraplegia, along with reasonable late survival and good durability. However, patients with chronic dissection tend to more commonly undergo subsequent repair to treat progressive aortic disease, which emphasizes the need for robust long-term imaging surveillance protocols. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To characterize patient risk profiles and outcomes associated with staged ultra-hybrid repair of extensive aortic disease, in which open thoracoabdominal completion was performed after thoracic stent grafting. From 1/2006 to 1/2021, 92 patients underwent open thoracoabdominal repair of chronic dissection (n=58, 63%), degenerative aneurysm (n=28, 30%), endoleak (n=4, 4.3%), or symptomatic acute type B dissection (n=2, 2.2%) after descending thoracic stent grafting (69, 75%), frozen elephant trunk (5, 5%), or both (18, 20%). The surgical graft was sewn to the distal endovascular device in situ, reducing the extent of the open procedure and eliminating the need for hypothermic circulatory arrest. Mean age was 58±13 years, 89 (97%) were hypertensive, 38 (43%) had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 63 (72%) were smokers, 20 (24%) had a prior stroke, and 33 (36%) had a suspected or confirmed heritable aortic condition. Hospital mortality was 7.6% (n=7). Complications included dialysis (16, 20%), tracheostomy (8, 8.7%), stroke (5, 5.7%), and permanent paralysis (6, 6.9%). Survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 80%, 71%, and 66%, respectively. Mortality was associated with higher blood urea nitrogen and longer distance between the distal endograft edge and proximal patent visceral vessel (P=0.004 and .01, respectively). Patients with extensive aortic disease undergoing open aortic repair after thoracic stent grafting are often young with chronic dissection, multiple comorbidities, or a heritable aortic condition. Success of staged ultra-hybrid operations demonstrates open and endovascular repair strategies are complementary, even when performed in a high-risk patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Image-based sarcopenia has been the subject of recent studies, hypothesized as a prognostic factor for patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Methods and Materials: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of patients who underwent complex endovascular repair for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms between 2008 and 2016. CT image assessment was performed and patients were classified as sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic using two stratification methods: skeletal mass index (SMI) and total psoas muscle index (TPMI). According to sex, each patient was defined as sarcopenic if their SMI or TPMI was in the lowest third of the study group. The primary endpoint was impact of sarcopenia on perioperative mortality and long-term survival. Secondary endpoints were perioperative complications. Results: From a total of 155 patients, 135 were eligible for study. Overall, in-hospital mortality was 5.9% (8/135). The 30-day, 1-year, 3-year and 5-year mortality was 10.4% (14/135), 20% (27/135), 28.1% (38/135) and 31.1% (42/135), respectively. There was no difference in the long-term mortality rates between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients regardless of the stratification method used (p = 0.4 for SMI and p = 0.2 for TPMI). According to SMI, 30-day mortality of sarcopenic patients was significantly lower in comparison to non-sarcopenic patients (1/45, 2.2% vs. 13/90, 14.4%, p = 0.028). Based on the total psoas muscle index, sarcopenic patients were at higher risk for development of pulmonary complications in comparison to non-sarcopenic patients postoperatively (p = 0.03). Conclusion: Using SMI and TPMI, sarcopenia was not associated with reduced long-term survival in patients undergoing complex endovascular repair for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair remains associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates despite advancements in surgical techniques. In our technique, we describe partial aortic clamping for debranching of the visceral and renal arteries and the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as an alternative perfusion strategy. The advantage of using our technique is the reduced need for heparinization, a less inflammatory response, no need for cooling of the patient, the reduction of cardiac overload and limited ischemia time to all intra-abdominal organs and lower extremities. Central message: ECMO and abdominal debranching with partial thoracic clamping during TAAA repair are ideal for reducing ischemia.

Abtract: Urgent thoracoabdominal aortic (TAA) pathologies pose a major clinical challenge, where physician-modified endografts offer a rapid, off-the-shelf and patient-customized solution. We illustrate the treatment of different urgent thoracoabdominal aortic pathologies with physician-modified abdominal aortic extensions. Due to its short endograft length, modification and re-sheathing can be performed fast and deployment with a high precision. Furthermore, keeping the tip capture closed, target vessel cannulation is enhanced from a femoral access. These features possibly lead to improved clinical outcomes.

Objectives: Image-based sarcopenia has been the subject of recent studies, hypothesized as a prognostic factor for patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Methods and Materials: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of patients who underwent complex endovascular repair for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms between 2008 and 2016. CT image assessment was performed and patients were classified as sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic using two stratification methods: skeletal mass index (SMI) and total psoas muscle index (TPMI). According to sex, each patient was defined as sarcopenic if their SMI or TPMI was in the lowest third of the study group. The primary endpoint was impact of sarcopenia on perioperative mortality and long-term survival. Secondary endpoints were perioperative complications. Results: From a total of 155 patients, 135 were eligible for study. Overall, in-hospital mortality was 5.9% (8/135). The 30-day, 1-year, 3-year and 5-year mortality was 10.4% (14/135), 20% (27/135), 28.1% (38/135) and 31.1% (42/135), respectively. There was no difference in the long-term mortality rates between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients regardless of the stratification method used (p = 0.4 for SMI and p = 0.2 for TPMI). According to SMI, 30-day mortality of sarcopenic patients was significantly lower in comparison to non-sarcopenic patients (1/45, 2.2% vs. 13/90, 14.4%, p = 0.028). Based on the total psoas muscle index, sarcopenic patients were at higher risk for development of pulmonary complications in comparison to non-sarcopenic patients postoperatively (p = 0.03). Conclusion: Using SMI and TPMI, sarcopenia was not associated with reduced long-term survival in patients undergoing complex endovascular repair for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

Objective: To report the mid-term outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F-BEVAR) following a failed previous endovascular aneurysm repair (pEVAR) or previous open aneurysm repair (pOAR). Methods: Data from consecutive patients who underwent F-BEVAR for pEVAR or pOAR from 2006 to 2021 from 17 European vascular centers were analyzed. Endpoints included technical success, major adverse events, 30-day mortality, and 5-year estimates of survival, target vessel primary patency, freedom from reinterventions, type I/III endoleaks, and sac growth >5 mm. Background: Treatment of a failed previous abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is a complex undertaking. F-BEVAR is becoming an increasingly attractive option, although comparative data are limited regarding associated risk factors, indications for treatment, and various outcomes. Results: There were 526 patients included, 268 pOAR and 258 pEVAR. The median time from previous repair to F-BEVAR was 7 (interquartile range, 4–12) years, 5 (3–8) for pEVAR, and 10 (6–14) for pOAR, P <0.001. Predominant indication for treatment was type Ia endoleak for pEVAR and progression of the disease for pOAR. Technical success was 92.8%, pOAR (92.2%), and pEVAR (93.4%), P =0.58. The 30-day mortality was 6.5% overall, 6.7% for pOAR, and 6.2% for pEVAR, P =0.81. There were 1853 treated target vessels with 5-year estimates of primary patency of 94.4%, pEVAR (95.2%), and pOAR (94.4%), P =0.03. Five-year estimates for freedom from type I/III endoleaks were similar between groups; freedom from reintervention was lower for pEVAR (38.3%) than for pOAR (56.0%), P =0.004. The most common indication for reinterventions was for type I/III endoleaks (37.5%). Conclusions: Repair of a failed pEVAR or pOARis safe and feasible with comparable technical success and survival rates. While successful treatment can be achieved, significant rates of reintervention should be anticipated, particularly for issues related to instability of target vessels/bridging stents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For a long time, parallel grafting, physician-modified endografts, and, more recently, in situ fenestration were the only go-to endovascular options for ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, offered mixed results, and depended mainly on the operator's and center's experience. As custom-made devices have become an established endovascular treatment option for elective thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, they are not a viable option in the emergency setting, as endograft production can take up to 4 months. The development of off-the-shelf (OTS) multibranched devices with a standardized configuration has allowed the treatment of ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm with emergent branched endovascular procedures. The Zenith t-Branch device (Cook Medical) was the first readily available graft outside the United States to receive the CE mark (in 2012) and is currently the most studied device for those indications. A new device, the E-nside thoracoabdominal branch endoprosthesis OTS multibranched endograft (Artivion), has been made commercially available, and the GORE EXCLUDER thoracoabdominal branch endoprosthesis OTS multibranched endograft (W. L. Gore and Associates) is expected to be released in 2023. Due to the lack of guidelines on ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, this review summarizes the available treatment options (ie, parallel grafts, physician-modified endografts, in situ fenestrations, and OTS multibranched devices), compares the indications and contraindications, and points out the evidence gaps that should be filled in the next decade. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We describe the feasibility of a technique for temporary aneurysm sac reperfusion after endovascular single-stage thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm exclusion, to be used in the case of postoperative spinal cord ischemia. Two cases were treated for impending rupture of a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. Before completion of sac exclusion, a supplementary buddy wire (V-18 control guidewire; Boston Scientific) was advanced in parallel fashion from the left percutaneous femoral access into the aneurysmal sac on the posterior aspect of the endograft. Distal aneurysm exclusion was completed using the main superstiff guidewire, and the femoral access was closed with a percutaneous closure device (ProGlide; Abbott) in standard fashion, leaving in place the sole V-18 guidewire, draped in sterile fashion. In the case of spinal cord ischemia, the “safe-line” can be rapidly used for spinal reperfusion after trans-sealing exchange with a 6F, 65-cm-long Destination sheath (Terumo) connected to a 6F introducer on the contralateral femoral artery.

This complex case study describes the surgical approach for a patient with chronic aortic dissection and multiple comorbidities. The patient had multiple previous surgeries, including aortic repair. The surgical approach involved a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair with left heart bypass, spinal fluid drainage, selective visceral perfusion, and protection of the surviving kidney. A Dacron tube graft was used to replace the damaged area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A left-sided inferior vena cava poses a unique challenge when cannulating for cardiopulmonary bypass during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and how to effectively and safely do so has not been previously described. A 51-year-old woman with a history of Loeys-Dietz syndrome and a left-sided inferior vena cava underwent open Crawford extent II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Cardiopulmonary bypass cannulation was performed using the right axillary artery, left common femoral artery, and right internal jugular vein. The patient's repair was successful, and she was ultimately discharged back to her home.

Background: Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (Siewert II AEG) can be resected by the right thoracoabdominal surgical approach (RTA) or abdominal-transhiatal surgical approach (TH) under minimally invasive conditions. Although both surgical methods achieve complete tumor resection, there is a debate as to whether the former method is superior to or at least noninferior to the latter in terms of surgical safety. Currently, a small number of retrospective studies have compared the two surgical approaches, with inconclusive results. As such, a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial is necessary to validate the value of RTA (Ivor-Lewis) compared to TH. Methods: The planned study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Patients (n=212) with Siewert II AEG that could be resected by either of the above two surgical approaches will be included in this trial and randomized to the RTA group (n=106) or the TH group (n=106). The primary outcome will be 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary outcomes will include 5-year overall survival (OS), incidence of postoperative complications, postoperative mortality, local recurrence rate, number and location of removed lymph nodes, quality of life (QOL), surgical Apgar score, and duration of the operation. Follow-ups are scheduled every three months for the first 3 years after the surgery and every six months for the next 2 years. Discussion: Among Siewert II AEG patients with resectable tumors, this is the first prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing the surgical safety of minimally invasive RTA and TH. RTA is hypothesized to provide better digestive tract reconstruction and dissection of mediastinal lymph nodes while maintaining a high quality of life and good postoperative outcome. Moreover, this trial will provide a high level of evidence for the choice of surgical procedures for Siewert II AEG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair has been associated with a high risk of postoperative mortality, spinal cord ischemia, and renal failure. Endovascular repair combined with open repair in a two-staged hybrid approach has had a lower incidence of postoperative morbidity and mortality compared with open repair. In the present report, we have described single-stage hybrid repair of a complex chronic type B aortic dissection with a Crawford extent II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm in a patient with extensive prior aortic reconstruction.

Abstract Background To date, Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (ST-II AEG) can be removed radically utilizing either the abdominal-transhiatal (TH) or the right thoracoabdominal (RTA) approaches. Because of a paucity of high-quality direct evidence, the appropriate surgical approach for ST-II AEG remains debatable. In the present, only several retrospective studies are available, representing ambiguous results. Thus, prospective randomized clinical trials are demanded to compare the survival, oncological outcomes, safety and efficiency and life quality between the TH and RTA approach in patients with resectable AEG of Siewert type II. Methods A prospective, multicenter, open, randomized, and parallel controlled study named S2AEG will be conducted. Three hundred and twelve patients who match the inclusion criteria but not the exclusion criteria will be participating in the trial and randomly divided into the TH (156) and RTA (156) cohorts. The primary efficacy endpoint is the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) following the operation. The rate of R0-resection, the number and site of lymph nodes infiltrated and dissected, postoperative complications, hospital days and life quality are the second endpoints. Discussion This study is the first prospectively randomized controlled trial aiming to compare the surgical outcomes between TH and RTA approaches in patients with resectable ST-II AEG. It is hypothesized that patients in the TH cohort would harvest equivalent oncological results and survival while maintaining acceptable life quality when compared to patients in the RTA cohort. Our findings will provide high-level clinical evidence for clinical decision-making on the appropriate surgical approach for patients with ST-II AEG. Embarked in November 2019, this research will be completed 3 years after the final participant’s enrolment date. Trial registration Clinical Trial.gov ID: NCT04910789 May 29, 2021. Name: S2AEG.

Background: Initial clinical evaluation (ICE) is traditionally considered a useful screening tool to identify frail patients during the preoperative assessment. However, emerging evidence supports the more objective assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) via cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to improve surgical risk stratification. Herein, we compared both subjective and objective assessment approaches to highlight the interpretive idiosyncrasies. Methods: As part of routine preoperative patient contact, patients scheduled for major surgery were prospectively "eyeballed" (ICE) by two experienced clinicians before more detailed history taking that also included the American Society of Anesthesiologists score classification. Each patient was subjectively judged to be either "frail" or "not frail" by ICE and "fit" or "unfit" from a thorough review of the medical notes. Subjective data were compared against the more objective validated assessment of postoperative outcomes using established CPET "cut‐off" metrics incorporating peak pulmonary oxygen uptake, V̇O2PEAK at the anaerobic threshold (V̇O2‐AT), and ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide that collectively informed risk stratification. These data were retrospectively extracted from a single‐center prospective National Health Service database. Data were analyzed using the Chi‐square automatic interaction detection decision tree method. Results: A total of 127 patients were examined that comprised 58% male and 42% female patients aged 69 ± 10 years with a body mass index of 29 ± 7 kg/m2. Patients were poorly conditioned with a V̇O2PEAK almost 20% lower than predicted for age, sex‐matched healthy controls with 35% exhibiting a V̇O2‐AT < 11 ml/kg/min. Disagreement existed between the subjective assessments of risk with ∼34% of patients classified as not frail on ICE were considered unfit by notes review (p <.0001). Furthermore, ∼35% of patients considered not frail on ICE and ∼31% of patients considered fit by notes review exhibited a V̇O2‐AT < 11 ml/kg/min, and of these, ∼28% and ∼19% were classified as intermediate to high risk. Conclusions: These findings highlight the interpretive limitations associated with the subjective assessment of patient frailty with surgical risk classification underestimated in up to a third of patients compared to the validated assessment of CRF. They reinforce the benefits of a more objective and integrated approach offered by CPET that may help us to improve perioperative risk assessment and better direct critical care provision in patients scheduled for "high‐stakes" surgery including open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chimneys and periscopes are often used to treat pararenal or thoracoabdominal aneurysms de novo or after failed open or endovascular repair. We sought to describe our institutional experience, given their limited success and questionable long-term outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed the electronic records for patients treated with chimneys/periscopes from 1997 through 2020. Baseline characteristics, procedural details, periprocedural complications, reinterventions, and midterm outcomes were collected. Fifty-eight patients (86 vessels) were treated; the median follow-up was 32 months (range, 0.03-104 months). There were 36% (n = 21) juxta-renal, 2% (n = 1) para-visceral, and 21% (n = 12) thoracoabdominal aneurysms, and 41% (n = 24) had pararenal failure of prior endovascular aneurysm repair (n = 17) or open repair (n = 7). Stent configuration for the majority of the 86 vessels (n = 80; 93%) treated were chimney configuration (n = 6 periscopes; 7%). The most common stent graft utilized was Viabahn, and 8.1% (n = 7) were reinforced with a bare metal stent. Although the majority of the cases were elective, 36.2% (n = 21) of the cases were urgent/emergent. At the conclusion of the initial procedure, 16 of 58 patients had an endoleak (gutter, 50% [8/16]; type Ia, 25% [4/16]; and type II, 25% [4/16]). On follow-up, 14 of 58 patients developed one or more endoleaks, with the most common endoleaks being a gutter endoleak (35% [7/20]). Other endoleaks observed included 30% (6/20) type III, 15% (3/20) type Ia, 15% (3/20) type Ib, and 5% (1/20) type II. Eleven of 58 patients underwent interventions for one or more endoleak (gutter, 33% [5/15]; type Ib, 20% [3/15]; type II, 7% [1/15]; and type III, 40% [6/15]). Twelve of 58 patients returned to the operating room for one or more procedures during the index hospitalization (five laparotomies, three dialysis access, three acute limb ischemia, and four chimney/periscope interventions). Ten of 58 patients underwent angioplasty/stenting for chimney/periscope compression or occlusion during the follow-up period. Survival was 61.3% at 1 year by Kaplan-Meier analysis (75% for elective, 37% for urgent/emergent) (aneurysm-related death, 22%). Cox hazard modeling showed that aneurysm diameter (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.004-1.05; P =.02) and urgent/emergent interventions (hazard ratio, 3.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-9.74; P =.01) were predictors of mortality. Endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms with chimneys/periscopes is associated with poor outcomes, including limited technical success and aneurysm exclusion, as well as high morbidity and mortality, with a high rate of reinterventions both in the immediate postoperative period and on follow-up. They should be used only when other surgical or endovascular options are not possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare short- and mid-term outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular repair (F-BEVAR) of pararenal (PRAA)/thoracoabdominal (TAAA) aortic aneurysms in patients with or without prior endovascular/open (EVAR/OAR) infrarenal aortic repair. Methods: Data from consecutive F-BEVAR (2010–2019) at two high-volume aortic centers were retrospectively reviewed. Primary endpoints were technical success, 30-day mortality, and overall survival. Secondary endpoints included 30-day major adverse events (MAE), freedom from type I/III endoleaks, reinterventions, sac expansion, and target vessel (TV) primary patency. Results: A total of 222 consecutive patients were included for analysis; of these 58 (26.1%) had prior infrarenal repair (EVAR=33, OAR=25) and 164 (73.9%) had native PRAA/TAAA. At baseline, patients with prior infrarenal repair were older (mean age=75.1 vs 71.6 years, p=.005) and the proportion of females was lower (8.6% vs 29.3%, p=.002). Technical success was 97.8% (n=217) in the entire cohort, without any significant differences between study groups (94.8% vs 98.8%, p=.08). At 30 days, there were no significant differences between patients with prior infrarenal repair as compared with those without in rate of MAE (44.8% vs 54.9%, p=.59). The 5-year estimate of survival for those who underwent native aortic repair was 61.6%, versus 61.3% for those who had a previous repair (p=.67). The 5-year freedom from endoleaks I/III estimates were significantly lower in patients who had prior infrarenal repair as compared with patients undergoing treatment of native aneurysms (57.1% vs 66.1%, p=.03), mainly owing to TV-related endoleaks (ie, type IC and/or IIIC endoleaks). No significant differences were found between study groups in rates of reinterventions and TV primary patency. Five-year estimates of freedom from sac increase >5mm were significantly lower in patients who received F-BEVAR after previous infrarenal repair as compared with those who underwent treatment of native aneurysms (48.6% vs 77.5%, p=.002). Conclusions: F-BEVAR is equally safe and feasible for treatment of patients with prior infrarenal repair as compared with those undergoing treatment for native aneurysms. Increased rates of TV-related endoleaks were observed which could lead to lower freedom from aneurysm sac shrinkage during follow-up. Nevertheless, the 5-year rates of reinterventions and TV patency were similar, thereby indicating that overall effectiveness of treatment remained satisfactory at mid-term. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women, accounting for ~26% of all incident cancers. Modified radical mastectomy is still one of the most commonly used surgical techniques for breast cancer, and in some selected patient it is the only surgery to be performed. Skin defects after mastectomy is a major problem facing breast surgeons, especially in cases of recurrent breast cancer, locally advanced breast cancer as in the case of inflammatory breast cancer as well as male breast cancer. Aim The present study compares the thoracoabdominal flap and the latissimus dorsi flap in the coverage of skin defects after mastectomy. Materials and methods The present study was conducted on 60 patients with recurrent, locally advanced female breast cancer and male breast cancer after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, who were candidates for modified radical mastectomy that resulted in chest wall defect and needed skin coverage. Patients were admitted to the Surgical Oncology Unit, Alexandria Main University Hospital. Patients were randomly classified into two equal groups, of 30 patients each. Result Patients were randomly classified into two equal groups. Group A had modified radical mastectomy with coverage of defect using the latissimus dorsi flap. Group B had modified radical mastectomy with coverage of defects using the thoracoabdominal flap, and there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, size of breast, site of lesion, neoadjuvant treatment, size of mass, contraceptive pills, and size of the defect. A statistical significance between two groups were found in the size of the harvested flaps (<0.001) and the duration of the operation (<0.001). Conclusion Chest wall defects following mastectomy can be covered by use of the latissimus dorsi flap or the thoracoabdominal flap. The advantages of thoracoabdominal flaps over latissimus dorsi flaps is the size of the harvested flap size and duration of operation as well as it is more applicable in Egyptian females with a large belly skin and heavily infiltrated axilla in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We aimed to identify outcomes and factors that independently associate with early mortality after open repair of Crawford extent IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms, defined as aneurysms confined to the segment below the diaphragm. This retrospective analysis included 721 extent IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs performed in our institution from 1986 to 2021. Indications for repair were aneurysm without dissection in 627 cases (87.0%) and aortic dissection in 94 cases (13.0%). Overall, 466 patients (64.6%) were symptomatic preoperatively; 124 (17.2%) procedures were performed in patients with acute presentation, including 58 (8.0%) ruptured aneurysms. Operative death occurred after 49 (6.8%) repairs. Persistent renal failure necessitating dialysis occurred after 43 (6.0%) repairs. Binary logistic regression modeling revealed that previous extent II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair, chronic kidney disease, previous myocardial infarction, urgent or emergency repair, and longer crossclamp times during surgery were independently associated with operative mortality. Among early survivors (n = 672), competing risk analysis revealed that cumulative incidence of mortality and reintervention rates at 10 years were 74.8% (95% confidence interval, 71.4%-78.5%) and 3.3% (95% confidence interval, 2.2%-5.1%), respectively. Although patient comorbidities contributed to operative mortality, factors associated with the repair, such as urgent or emergency status, the duration of aortic crossclamping, and certain types of complex reoperation, also played prominent roles. Patients who survive the operation can expect a durable repair that usually is free from late reintervention. Expanding our collective knowledge regarding patients who undergo open repair of extent IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms will enable clinicians to establish best practices and improve patient outcomes. [Display omitted] [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Thoracoabdominal aneurysms pose technical challenges for endovascular repair due to involvement of visceral and renal vessels. We report a case series of four patients diagnosed with thoracoabdominal aneurysm who underwent complex endovascular repair with Fenestrated Device and chimney grafts (FEVARCh). FEVARCh is a technically feasible approach for repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms that involve renal, superior mesenteric, and celiac arteries for patients not appropriate for open surgical repair. Further studies are needed to understand the implications of resultant Type 1a endoleaks and strategies to minimize the displacement of the main body graft with adjunct chimneys. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Procedural staging is often performed to reduce the incidence of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) during endovascular treatment of extensive thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). However, its role in the case of previous thoracic or infrarenal aortic repair (historical staging) has been controversial. In the present study, we evaluated the SCI rates when procedural staging was routinely used and studied its potential benefits when previous aortic repairs had already been performed. The data from patients treated electively with fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair for extent I, II, III, and V TAAAs were retrieved from a multicenter registry (four high-volume national teaching hospitals) and analyzed. The primary endpoint was the rate of SCI and its association with preoperative and postoperative variables, including historical staging, procedural staging, and an impaired collateral network (subclavian or hypogastric stenosis >75% per occlusion). Variables were defined in accordance with the Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards. A logistic regression model with stepwise selection was used to identify the predictors of SCI. A total of 240 patients (76% male; median age, 73 years) were analyzed. Of the 240 patients, 43 (18%) had presented with an impaired collateral network, 136 (57%) had had historical staging, and 157 (65%) had received procedural staging. Preoperative spinal fluid cerebrospinal drainage was performed in 130 patients (54%). Permanent grade 3 SCI was observed in 13 patients (5%) and was negatively affected by both an impaired collateral network (odds ratio [OR], 17.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-176; P =.016) and the presence of bilateral iliac occlusive disease (OR, 10.1; 95% CI, 1.1-98.3; P =.046). Both historical (OR, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.001-0.46; P =.014) and procedural (OR, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.02-0.7; P =.019) staging mitigated the permanent SCI rates. The need for postoperative transfusions (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.8; P =.014) and the occurrence of postoperative renal complications (OR, 6.5; 95% CI, 1.2-35.0; P <.001) were associated with the development of SCI. Among the patients with historical staging, no further benefit from procedural staging was observed (SCI with procedural staging, 1%; vs no staging, 2%; P = NS). For patients with extensive TAAAs treated with fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair, both historical and planned procedural staging were associated with reduced permanent SCI rates. However, no additional benefit was observed when procedural staging was performed in patients with historical staging and an intact collateral network. The protective role of preoperative cerebrospinal fluid drainage placement requires further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The reversed elephant trunk technique permits staged repair of extensive thoracic aortic aneurysm in patients whose distal (ie, descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal) aorta is symptomatic or disproportionately large compared with their proximal aorta (ie, ascending aorta and transverse aortic arch). We present our 23-year experience with the reversed elephant trunk approach. Between 1994 and 2017, 94 patients (median age 62 [46-69] years) underwent stage 1 reversed elephant trunk repair of the distal aorta. Fifty-three patients (56%) had aortic dissection, and 31 patients (33%) had heritable thoracic aortic disease. Eighty-eight operations (94%) were Crawford extent I or II thoracoabdominal aortic repairs. Twenty-seven patients (29%) underwent subsequent stage 2 repair of the proximal aorta; 14 patients (52%) required redo median sternotomy. The median time between the stage 1 and 2 operations was 18.8 (4.8-69.3) months. The operative mortality was 10% (9/94) for stage 1 repairs and 4% (1/27) for stage 2 repairs; 1 patient with heritable thoracic aortic disease died after stage 1 repair (1/31, 3%), and 1 patient died after stage 2 repair (1/13, 8%). Two patients (2%) had ruptures after stage 1 repair; 1 resulted in death, and 1 precipitated emergency stage 2 repair. In total, 36 patients (38%) who survived stage 1 repair died before stage 2 reversed elephant trunk completion repair could be performed. Managing extensive aortic aneurysm with the 2-stage reversed elephant trunk technique yields acceptable short-term outcomes. This technique is useful for the reversed elephant trunk in patients who require distal aortic repair before proximal repair and is particularly effective in patients with heritable thoracic aortic disease. The low number of patients returning for completion repair is concerning. Rigorous surveillance is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Trauma is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the first four decades of life. Thoracoabdominal gunshot wounds carry a significant risk of mortality. This risk of death is reduced if patients are managed in dedicated units. This study examines the outcome of these patients managed in a district level hospital. Method: In this retrospective review, patients with thoracoabdominal gunshot wounds were identified from operating room registry for the period of January 2015 to December 2018. Data was collected retrospectively from folders and analysed for the primary outcome of mortality. Results: Sixty-eight thoracoabdominal gunshot wounds were managed operatively over the period described. Only six patients were female. The median age was 29.5 years. Fourteen patients required postoperative transfer to a level 1 trauma unit. Thirteen patients died, nine at the district hospital and four at the level 1 unit. Significant differences in organ injuries were noted in the patients that died compared to the survivors. Discussion: The in-hospital mortality rate of patients managed at the district hospital was 13.2% which is comparable to international rates of 12–18%. However, the subset of patients that required postoperative transfer to a level 1 trauma unit had a high mortality rate of 28.6%. The DH is committed to managing unstable and unresponsive patients once they present. Improved mortality rates will only occur with better prehospital transport policies and by equipping the DH to manage these patients postoperatively. Conclusion: Management of these patients can be successful at a district hospital. However, significant obstacles exist to their optimal care, as demonstrated by the high mortality patients requiring postoperative transfer.

Background: To date, Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (ST-II AEG) can be removed radically utilizing either the abdominal-transhiatal (TH) or the right thoracoabdominal (RTA) approaches. Because of a paucity of high-quality direct evidence, the appropriate surgical approach for ST-II AEG remains debatable. In the present, only several retrospective studies are available, representing ambiguous results. Thus, prospective randomized clinical trials are demanded to compare the survival, oncological outcomes, safety and efficiency and life quality between the TH and RTA approach in patients with resectable AEG of Siewert type II.Methods: A prospective, multicenter, open, randomized, and parallel controlled study named S2AEG will be conducted. Three hundred and twelve patients who match the inclusion criteria but not the exclusion criteria will be participating in the trial and randomly divided into the TH (156) and RTA (156) cohorts. The primary efficacy endpoint is the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) following the operation. The rate of R0-resection, the number and site of lymph nodes infiltrated and dissected, postoperative complications, hospital days and life quality are the second endpoints.Discussion: This study is the first prospectively randomized controlled trial aiming to compare the surgical outcomes between TH and RTA approaches in patients with resectable ST-II AEG. It is hypothesized that patients in the TH cohort would harvest equivalent oncological results and survival while maintaining acceptable life quality when compared to patients in the RTA cohort. Our findings will provide high-level clinical evidence for clinical decision-making on the appropriate surgical approach for patients with ST-II AEG. Embarked in November 2019, this research will be completed 3 years after the final participant's enrolment date.Trial Registration: Clinical Trial.gov ID: NCT04910789 May 29, 2021. Name: S2AEG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Ganglioneuromas (GNs) are extremely rare, slowly growing, benign tumors that can arise from Schwann cells, ganglion cells, and neuronal or fibrous tissues. Due to their origin from the sympathetic neural crest, they show neuroendocrine potential; however, most are reported to be hormonally inactive. Nevertheless, complete surgical removal is recommended for symptom control or for the prevention of potential malignant degeneration. Case Report A 30-year-old female was referred to our oncologic center due to a giant retroperitoneal and mediastinal mass detected in computed tomography (CT) scans. The initial symptoms were transient nausea, diarrhea, and crampy abdominal pain. There was a positive family history including 5 first- and second-degree relatives. Presurgical biopsy revealed a benign ganglioneuroma. Total resection (TR) of a 35 × 25 × 25 cm, 2550-g tumor was obtained successfully via laparotomy combined with thoracotomy and partial incision of the diaphragm. Histopathological analysis confirmed the diagnosis. Surgically challenging aspects were the bilateral tumor invasion from the retroperitoneum into the mediastinum through the aortic hiatus with the need of a bilateral 2-cavity procedure, as well as the tumor-related displacement of the abdominal aorta, the mesenteric vessels, and the inferior vena cava. Due to their anatomic course through the tumor mass, the lumbar aortic vessels needed to be partially resected. Postoperative functioning was excellent without any sign of neurologic deficit. Conclusion Here, we present the largest case of a TR of a GN with retroperitoneal and mediastinal expansion. On review of the literature, this is the largest reported GN resected and was performed safely. Additionally, we present the first systematic literature review for large GN (> 10 cm) as well as for resected tumors growing from the abdominal cavity into the thoracic cavity.

Abstract Penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries carry high morbidity and mortality. Concurrent clinical evaluation and resuscitation followed by early surgery are associated with good outcome. In a resource‐limited setting, plain X‐rays are valuable in surgery planning. Impalement objects must only be removed at surgery.

Background Thoracic and abdominal aortic stent grafts are firmer and more rigid than the native aorta. Aortic implanted devices have been implicated in the development of acute systolic hypertension, elevated pulse pressure, and reduced coronary perfusion. Case summary We report four cases of staged thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and then endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). All patients had TEVAR first for thoracic aortic aneurysm and later on developed infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) that required EVAR. There were three males and one female with a median age of 74.5 years (range 67.5–78.5). None of the patients developed aortic-related major clinical adverse effects or required any aortic intervention during their follow-up. However, within 2 years, all patients developed symptomatic left ventricular hypertrophy with diastolic dysfunction. All patients had bilateral lower limb oedema, with on and off chest pain and shortness of breath (SOB), necessitating coronary angiograms, which showed no evidence of coronary artery disease. Three patients died from cardiovascular-related morbidities, and the fourth patient is still complaining of SOB despite a normal coronary angiogram. Discussion Aortic-endograft compliance mismatch is an invisible enemy, with troubling consequences for the aorta proximal and distal to the endograft. Aortic stiffness due to vascular endograft could lead to cardiovascular adverse events, even in the absence of direct aortic-related complications. After combined TEVAR and EVAR, the compliance mismatch and elasticity loss are even more pronounced than with TEVAR alone, which necessitates patient monitoring for the development of cardiovascular complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (dTAA) or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) often have a variety of medical comorbidities. Those that are deemed acceptable for intervention undergo complicated repairs with good early outcomes. The purpose of this study was to identify variables that were associated with mortality over time. This was a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database at our institution from 1983 to 2015. Patients were included if they underwent open or endovascular repair for dTAA or TAAA. Patients were excluded if they were intervened on for traumatic transections. The primary outcome for the study was long-term survival. Secondary outcomes included aortic-related mortality. We had mortality and survival data on all patients. A total of 946 patients met our study criteria with a median follow-up of 102.8 months (interquartile range [IQR], 58.9-148.2 months). The median age of the cohort was 71 years (IQR, 63-77 years) with the majority of patients being male (58.1%). The extent of TAAA pathology was as follows: type I (14.2%), type II (21.2%), type III (17.1%), type IV (26.2%), and dTAA (21.2%). A total of 147 patients (15.5%) had a prior dissection. The median diameter of aneurysm was 6.4 cm (IQR, 6.0-7.0 cm). A total of 158 patients (16.7%) underwent endovascular repair over the study period. Variables associated with mortality over time were age, surgical era, acute pathology, dissection, preoperative creatinine, and type IV TAAAs. In addition, experiencing the following complications in the postoperative period was associated with mortality over time: neurological, cardiac, and pulmonary. Aortic-related mortality was 2.1% (n = 20) over the study period. Patients who underwent endovascular repair for acute conditions had better long-term survival when compared with open repair. However, there were no differences in long-term survival between open and endovascular repair for nonacute cases. In addition, repair in the more modern era was associated with improved survival. TAAAs can be repaired with reasonable perioperative mortality rates. Once patients undergo repair of their aneurysm, aortic-related mortality remains low. The addition of endovascular options has dramatically changed management of patients with dTAA and TAAA. Further, endovascular repair was associated with decreased perioperative mortality and significantly increased long-term survival in acute patients. Patients undergoing TAAA repair are generally considered high risk and therefore require extensive long-term follow-up for management of their comorbidities and complications, because these are the main contributors to mortality over time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair (FBEVAR) has expanded the treatment of patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). Previous studies have demonstrated that women are less likely to be treated with standard infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair because of anatomic ineligibility and experience greater mortality after both infrarenal and thoracic aortic aneurysm repair. The purpose of the present study was to describe the sex-related outcomes after FBEVAR for treatment of TAAAs. The data from 886 patients with extent I to IV TAAAs (excluding pararenal or juxtarenal aneurysms), enrolled in eight prospective, physician-sponsored, investigational device exemption studies from 2013 to 2019, were analyzed. All data were collected prospectively, audited and adjudicated by clinical events committees and/or data safety monitoring boards, and subject to Food and Drug Administration oversight. All the patients had been treated with Cook-manufactured patient-specific FBEVAR devices or the Cook t-Branch off-the-shelf device (Cook Medical, Brisbane, Australia). Of the 886 patients who underwent FBEVAR, 288 (33%) were women. The women had more extensive aneurysms and a greater prevalence of diabetes (33% vs 26%; P =.043) but a lower prevalence of coronary artery disease (33% vs 52%; P <.0001) and previous infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair (7.6% vs 16%; P <.001). The women had required a longer operative time from incision to surgery end (5.0 ± 1.8 hours vs 4.6 ± 1.7 hours; P <.001), experienced lower technical success (93% vs 98%; P =.002), and were less likely to be discharged to home (72% vs 83%; P =.009). Despite the smaller access vessels, the women did not have an increased incidence of access site complications. Also, the 30-day outcomes were broadly similar between the sexes. At 1 year, no differences were found between the women and men in freedom from type I or III endoleak (91.4% vs 92.0%; P =.64), freedom from reintervention (81.7% vs 85.3%; P =.10), target vessel instability (87.5% vs 89.2%; P =.31), and survival (89.6% vs 91.7%; P =.26). The women had a greater incidence of postoperative sac expansion (12% vs 6.5%; P =.006). Multivariable modeling adjusted for age, aneurysm extent, aneurysm size, urgent procedure, and renal function showed that patient sex was not an independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-1.37; P =.46). Women undergoing FBEVAR demonstrated metrics of increased complexity and had a lower level of technical success, especially those with extensive aneurysms. Compared with the men, the women had similar 30-day mortality and 1-year outcomes, with the exception of an increased incidence of sac expansion. These data have demonstrated that FBEVAR is safe and effective for women and men but that further efforts to improve outcome parity are indicated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Medical & Pharmaceutical Sciences is the property of Arab Journal of Sciences & Research Publishing (AJSRP) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This report outlines a case of atypical presentation of COVID-19 viral infection. A two-stage repair of a Crawford type III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm was planned for a 65-year-old man. The first stage, thoracic endovascular aortic repair in the descending aorta, was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 2. He was readmitted 10 days later, presenting with diarrhea, lower limb pain, and weakness after walking 25 meters. The patient displayed no fever or upper respiratory tract signs or symptoms. Findings on computed tomography and magnetic resonance of the spinal cord were normal. The patient tested positive for COVID-19 virus and later during hospitalization developed more typical fever and respiratory symptoms that were managed medically.