Search

Zusammenfassung Nicht-Cholera-Vibrionen können beim Menschen Ohrinfektionen, Magen-Darm-Entzündungen sowie Wundinfektionen in unterschiedlicher klinischer Ausprägung verursachen. Im Jahr 2021 wurden dem Robert Koch-Institut insgesamt 29 solcher Infektionen gemeldet. Es ist davon auszugehen, dass die fortschreitende globale Erwärmung in Zukunft weltweit zu einem starken Anstieg der Infektionszahlen durch diese Erreger führen wird. Daher sollten medizinisches Personal, Gesundheitsämter und vulnerable Bevölkerungsgruppen über die Möglichkeit von Infektionen mit Nicht-Cholera-Vibrionen informiert sein.

Was ist neu? Epidemiologie und Klinik Die im Rahmen der COVID-19-Pandemie ergriffenen Infektionsschutzmaßnahmen und Reisebeschränkungen haben auch die Übertragung saisonaler Influenzaviren stark eingeschränkt. Es muss jedoch davon ausgegangen werden, dass das Infektionsgeschehen in der kommenden Influenzasaison nach dem Wegfall dieser Maßnahmen wieder zunehmen wird. Koinfektionen von saisonalen Influenzaviren und SARS-CoV-2 sind möglich und gehen gegebenenfalls mit einem erhöhten Risiko für schwere Krankheitsverläufe einher. Influenza-Impfung Die STIKO empfiehlt seit 2021 ab einem Alter von 60 Jahren den Einsatz tetravalenter Hochdosis-Impfstoffe. Diese enthalten im Vergleich zu standarddosierten Impfstoffen die 4-fache Antigenmenge. Impfstoffe, die auf der mRNA-Technologie beruhen, sowie universelle Influenza-Impfstoffe befinden sich in klinischer Prüfung. Es besteht nun auch für Apotheker*innen die Möglichkeit, Grippeimpfungen unter bestimmten Auflagen durchzuführen. Therapie Für Patient*innen mit erhöhtem Risiko für einen schweren Verlauf wird weiterhin eine frühzeitige antivirale Therapie mit dem Neuraminidase-Inhibitor Oseltamivir empfohlen. Der Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss (G-BA) sieht für Baloxavir marboxil dagegen keinen Zusatznutzen hinsichtlich der Therapie der Influenzavirus-Infektion. Die aktuelle S3-Leitlinie „Behandlung von erwachsenen Patienten mit ambulant erworbener Pneumonie“ gibt eine moderate Empfehlung zur antibakteriellen Behandlung hospitalisierter Patient*innen mit Influenza-Nachweis und nachgewiesenen pulmonalen Infiltraten. Der Grund dafür ist, dass eine bakterielle Superinfektion auch bei fehlendem mikrobiologischem Nachweis nicht ausgeschlossen werden kann und diese mit erhöhter Letalität einher geht.

ZusammenfassungKrankenhauspersonal, das eine Grippe- oder COVID-19-Schutzimpfung erhalten oder eine COVID-19-Schutzimpfung abgelehnt hatte, wurde bezüglich Einstellungen zur jeweiligen Schutzimpfung, Inanspruchnahme der Grippeschutzimpfung und Ablehnungsgründen der COVID-19-Schutzimpfung befragt. COVID-19-Schutzimpfungsablehnende schätzten verglichen mit den anderen beiden Gruppen das Risiko einer Infektion für sich selbst und generell sowie die Wirksamkeit der Schutzimpfung am niedrigsten und das Risiko der Schutzimpfung am höchsten ein. Auch berichteten sie die niedrigste frühere Inanspruchnahme der Grippeschutzimpfung. Der wahrgenommene Druck zur Impfung erwies sich als relevante Barriere. Zukünftige Impfkampagnen sollten eine Balance zwischen Informationen zu Impfstoffen, der Notwendigkeit der Schutzimpfung und Freiwilligkeit der Inanspruchnahme erhalten.

Persistent somatic and neuropsychiatric symptoms have been frequently described in patients after infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 even after a benign clinical course of the acute infection during the early phases of the coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic and are part of Long COVID. The Omicron variant emerged in November 2021 and has rapidly become predominant due to its high infectivity and suboptimal vaccine cross-protection. The frequency of neuropsychiatric post-acute sequelae after infection with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Omicron and adequate vaccination status is not known. Here, we aimed to characterize post-acute symptoms in individuals with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic breakthrough infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. These individuals had either proven infection with the Omicron variant (n = 157) or their infection occurred in 2022 where Omicron was the predominant variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in Germany (n = 107). This monocentric cross-sectional study was conducted at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf between 11 February 2022 and 11 April 2022. We employed questionnaires addressing self-reported somatic symptom burden (Somatic Symptom Scale 8) and neuropsychiatric symptoms including mood (Patient Health Questionnaire 2), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7), attention (Mindful Attention Awareness Scale) and fatigue (Fatigue Assessment Scale) in a cohort of hospital workers. Scores were compared between 175 individuals less than 4 weeks after positive testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, 88 individuals more than 4 weeks after positive testing and 87 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 uninfected controls. The majority (n = 313; 89.5%) of included individuals were vaccinated at least three times. After recovery from infection, no significant differences in scores assessing neuropsychiatric and somatic symptoms were detected between the three groups (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 uninfected controls, individuals less and more than 4 weeks after positive testing) independent of age, sex, preconditions and vaccination status. In addition, self-reported symptom burden did not significantly correlate with the number of vaccinations against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, time from recovery or the number of infections. Notably, in all three groups, the mean scores for each item of our questionnaire lay below the pathological threshold. Our data show that persistent neuropsychiatric and somatic symptoms after recovery from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in fully vaccinated hospital workers do not occur more frequently than that in uninfected individuals. This will guide healthcare professionals in the clinical management of patients after recovery from breakthrough infections with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Infection control measures and travel restrictions implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic have limited the transmission of seasonal influenza viruses as well. It must be assumed that after these public health measures have largely been lifted, influenza activity will sharply increase in the coming influenza season. Anticipating the potentially high number of cases, the co-circulation of influenza viruses and SARS-CoV-2, efforts to increase vaccination rates against both infectious diseases must be given more attention.Die im Rahmen der COVID-19-Pandemie ergriffenen Infektionsschutzmaßnahmen und Reisebeschränkungen haben auch die Übertragung saisonaler Influenzaviren stark eingeschränkt. Es muss jedoch davon ausgegangen werden, dass das Infektionsgeschehen in der kommenden Influenzasaison nach dem Wegfall dieser Maßnahmen wieder zunehmen wird. Koinfektionen von saisonalen Influenzaviren und SARS-CoV-2 sind möglich und gehen gegebenenfalls mit einem erhöhten Risiko für schwere Krankheitsverläufe einher.Die STIKO empfiehlt seit 2021 ab einem Alter von 60 Jahren den Einsatz tetravalenter Hochdosis-Impfstoffe. Diese enthalten im Vergleich zu standarddosierten Impfstoffen die 4-fache Antigenmenge. Impfstoffe, die auf der mRNA-Technologie beruhen, sowie universelle Influenza-Impfstoffe befinden sich in klinischer Prüfung. Es besteht nun auch für Apotheker*innen die Möglichkeit, Grippeimpfungen unter bestimmten Auflagen durchzuführen.Für Patient*innen mit erhöhtem Risiko für einen schweren Verlauf wird weiterhin eine frühzeitige antivirale Therapie mit dem Neuraminidase-Inhibitor Oseltamivir empfohlen. Der Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss (G-BA) sieht für Baloxavir marboxil dagegen keinen Zusatznutzen hinsichtlich der Therapie der Influenzavirus-Infektion. Die aktuelle S3-Leitlinie „Behandlung von erwachsenen Patienten mit ambulant erworbener Pneumonie“ gibt eine moderate Empfehlung zur antibakteriellen Behandlung hospitalisierter Patient*innen mit Influenza-Nachweis und nachgewiesenen pulmonalen Infiltraten. Der Grund dafür ist, dass eine bakterielle Superinfektion auch bei fehlendem mikrobiologischem Nachweis nicht ausgeschlossen werden kann und diese mit erhöhter Letalität einher geht.

Hintergrund: Nicht-Cholera-Vibrionen nehmen im Rahmen des Klimawandels eine zunehmende Bedeutung als humane Pathogene ein, da die Prävalenz dieser Erreger im Meereswasser entscheidend von der Wassertemperatur abhängt. In den letzten Jahren konnten während der Sommermonate wiederholt größere Infektionsausbrüche in gemäßigten Klimazonen beobachtet werden. Ziel der Arbeit: Information einer breiten ärztlichen Leserschaft über potenziell lebensbedrohliche Krankheitsbilder, die durch Infektionen mit Nicht-Cholera-Vibrionen ausgelöst werden. Material und Methoden: Übersicht über aktuelle Literatur zu Infektionen mit Nicht-Cholera-Vibrionen im Allgemeinen und zur epidemiologischen Situation in Deutschland im Speziellen. Ergebnisse: Nicht-Cholera-Vibrionen verursachen vorwiegend Wund- und Ohrinfektionen nach Kontakt mit kontaminiertem Meereswasser sowie Gastroenteritiden nach dem Konsum nicht ausreichend gegarter Meerestiere. Da bis März 2020 keine Meldepflicht für diese Erreger in Deutschland bestand, muss von einer hohen Dunkelziffer ausgegangen werden. Immunsupprimierte sowie chronisch erkrankte Menschen haben ein deutlich erhöhtes Risiko für schwere Krankheitsverläufe. Schon bei klinischem Verdacht sollte eine kalkulierte antiinfektive Therapie erfolgen und bei Wundinfektionen eine chirurgische Sanierung erwogen werden. Diskussion: Aufgrund des fortschreitenden Klimawandels muss in den kommenden Jahren mit dem vermehrten Auftreten von Infektionen mit Nicht-Cholera-Vibrionen gerechnet werden. Ärzte sollten über diese potenziell lebensbedrohlichen Erkrankungen informiert sein, um Patienten einer entsprechenden Diagnostik und Behandlung zuzuführen. Background: The abundance of non-cholera Vibrio spp. in the aquatic environment shows a positive correlation with water temperatures. Therefore, climate change has an important impact on the epidemiology of human infections with these pathogens. In recent years large outbreaks have been repeatedly observed during the summer months in temperate climate zones. Objective: To inform medical professionals about the potentially life-threatening diseases caused by non-cholera Vibrio spp. Material and methods: Review of the current literature on infections with non-cholera Vibrio spp. in general and on the epidemiological situation in Germany in particular. Results: Non-cholera Vibrio spp. predominantly cause wound and ear infections after contact with contaminated seawater and gastroenteritis after consumption of undercooked seafood. As there have not been mandatory notification systems for these pathogens in Germany up to March 2020, a high number of unreported cases must be assumed. Immunosuppressed and chronically ill patients have a much higher risk for severe courses of diseases. If an infection with non-cholera Vibrio spp. is suspected anti-infective treatment should be promptly initiated and surgical cleansing is often necessary for wound and soft tissue infections. Conclusion: Due to the ongoing global warming an increased incidence of human infections with non-cholera Vibrio spp. must be expected in the future. Medical professionals should be aware of these bacterial pathogens and the potentially life-threatening infections in order to enable timely diagnostics and treatment.

Background Frequent outbreaks around the globe and endemic appearance in different parts of the world emphasize the substantial risk of hantavirus diseases. Increasing incidence rates, trends of changing distribution of hantavirus species and new insights into clinical courses of hantavirus diseases call for multinational surveillance. Furthermore, evidence-based guidelines for the management of hantavirus diseases and scoring systems, which allow stratification of patients into risk categories, are lacking. Methods Hantavirus registry (HantaReg) is a novel registry platform facilitating multinational research of hantavirus-caused diseases, such as haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) and hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome (HCPS). HantaReg provides an electronic case report form and uses the General Data Protection Regulation compliant platform clinicalsurveys.net, which can be accessed from any internet browser in the world. Having a modular structure, the registry platform is designed to display or hide questions and items according to the documented case (e.g. patient with HFRS versus HCPS) to facilitate fast, but standardized, data entry. Information categories documented in HantaReg are demographics, pre-existing diseases, clinical presentation, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, as well as outcome. Conclusions HantaReg is a novel, ready-to-use platform for clinical and epidemiological studies on hantavirus diseases and facilitates the documentation of the disease course associated with hantavirus infections. HantaReg is expected to promote international collaboration and contributes to improving patient care through the analysis of diagnostic and treatment pathways for hantavirus diseases, providing evidence for robust treatment recommendations. Moreover, HantaReg enables the development of prognosis-indicating scoring systems for patients with hantavirus disease.

While several studies have described the clinical course of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), direct comparisons with patients with seasonal influenza are scarce. We compared 166 patients with COVID-19 diagnosed between February 27 and June 14, 2020, and 255 patients with seasonal influenza diagnosed during the 2017–18 season at the same hospital to describe common features and differences in clinical characteristics and course of disease. Patients with COVID-19 were younger (median age [IQR], 59 [45–71] vs 66 [52–77]; P

The ongoing monkeypox virus outbreak includes at least 7553 confirmed cases in previously non-endemic countries worldwide as of July 2022. Clinical presentation has been reported as highly variable, sometimes lacking classically described systemic symptoms, and only small numbers of cutaneous lesions in most patients. The aim of this study was to compare clinical data with longitudinal qPCR results from lesion swabs, oropharyngeal swabs and blood in a well characterized patient cohort.16 male patients (5 hospitalized, 11 outpatients) were included in the study cohort and serial testing for monkeypox virus-DNA carried out in various materials throughout the course of disease. Laboratory analysis included quantitative PCR, next-generation sequencing, immunofluorescence tests and virus isolation in cell culture.All patients were male, between age 20 and 60, and self-identified as men having sex with men. Two had a known HIV infection, coinciding with an increased number of lesions and viral DNA detectable in blood. In initial- and serial testing, lesion swabs yielded viral DNA-loads at, or above 10The data presented underscore the reliability of lesion swabs for monkeypox virus-detection, even in later stages of the disease. Oropharyngeal swabs and blood samples alone carry the risk of false negative results, but may hold value in pre-/asymptomatic cases or viral load monitoring, respectively.

To explore the humoral and T-cell response to the third COVID-19 vaccination in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH).Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers were prospectively determined in 81 AIH patients and 53 healthy age- and sex-matched controls7 days (median 35) after the first COVID-19 booster vaccination. The spike-specific T-cell response was assessed using an activation-induced marker assay (AIM) in a subset of patients.Median antibody levels were significantly lower in AIH compared to controls (10 908 vs. 25 000 AU/ml, p .001), especially in AIH patients treated with MMF (N = 14, 4542 AU/ml, p = .004) or steroids (N = 27, 7326 AU/ml, p = .020). Also, 48% of AIH patients had antibody titers below the 10% percentile of the healthy controls (9194 AU/ml, p .001). AIH patients had a high risk of failing to develop a spike-specific T-cell response (15/34 (44%) vs. 2/16 (12%), p = .05) and showed overall lower frequencies of spike-specific CD4 + T cells (median: 0.074% vs 0.283; p = .01) after the booster vaccination compared to healthy individuals. In 34/81 patients, antibody titers before and after booster vaccination were available. In this subgroup, all patients but especially those without detectable/low antibodies titers (100 AU/ml) after the second vaccination (N = 11/34) showed a strong, 148-fold increase.A third COVID-19 vaccination efficiently boosts antibody levels and T-cell responses in AIH patients and even seroconversion in patients with the absent immune response after two vaccinations, but to a lower level compared to controls. Therefore, we suggest routinely assessing antibody levels in AIH patients and offering additional booster vaccinations to those with suboptimal responses.

We aimed to provide in vitro data on the neutralization capacity of different monoclonal antibody (mAb) preparations against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) delta and omicron variant, respectively, and describe the in vivo RNA kinetics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients treated with the respective mAbs. Virus neutralization assays were performed to assess the neutralizing effect of the mAb formulations casirivimab/imdevimab and sotrovimab on the SARS-CoV-2 delta and omicron variant. Additionally, respiratory tract SARS-CoV-2 RNA kinetics are provided for 25 COVID-19 patients infected with either delta variant (n = 18) or omicron variant (n = 7) treated with the respective mAb formulations during their hospital stay. In the virus neutralization assay, sotrovimab exhibits neutralizing capacity at therapeutically achievable concentrations against the SARS-CoV-2 delta and omicron variant. In contrast, casivirimab/imdevimab had neutralizing capacity against the delta variant but failed neutralization against the omicron variant except for a very high concentration above the currently recommended therapeutic dosage. In patients with delta variant infections treated with casivirimab/imdevimab, we observed a rapid decrease of respiratory viral RNA at day 3 after mAb therapy. In contrast, no such prompt decline was observed in patients with delta variant or omicron variant infections receiving sotrovimab.

Literature investigating the impact of COVID-19 on healthcare professionals barely addresses predictors of somatic symptom burden during the COVID-19 pandemic.As biopsychosocial models propose that not only the disease but also sociodemographic and psychosocial factors contribute to the development and maintenance of symptoms, this study investigates the predictive value of these factors for bothersome somatic symptoms in SARS-CoV-2 negative healthcare professionals.German healthcare professionals were assessed with self-rating questionnaires and underwent SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody tests at baseline and 8 weeks later between April and August 2020. Differences in psychosocial variables between the time points were analyzed and regression analyses were performed to predict somatic symptoms at follow-up.1185 seronegative healthcare professionals completed both assessments. Previous somatic symptom burden, higher levels of anxiety, being a nurse, younger age, higher psychological symptom burden, lower efficiency, and higher fatigability at baseline predicted somatic symptom burden at follow-up. Comparisons between baseline and follow-up showed a significant improvement in psychological impairment and deterioration of physical exhaustion.Our study applies a biopsychosocial perspective to bothersome somatic symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic and contributes to the identification of potential risk factors as a starting point for future interventions that could support the handling of symptoms.

This cross-sectional study compared hospital staff who had received influenza or COVID-19 vaccination or who had refused COVID-19 vaccination in terms of attitudes towards each vaccination, uptake of influenza vaccination and reasons for refusing COVID-19 vaccination. COVID-19 vaccine refusers rated the risk of infection for themselves and in general and the effectiveness of the vaccination lowest and the vaccination risk highest compared to the other two groups. They also reported the lowest past uptake of influenza vaccination. Perceived pressure to vaccinate proved to be a relevant barrier. Future vaccination campaigns should maintain a balance between information on vaccines, the need for vaccination, and voluntary uptake.Krankenhauspersonal, das eine Grippe- oder COVID-19-Schutzimpfung erhalten oder eine COVID-19-Schutzimpfung abgelehnt hatte, wurde bezüglich Einstellungen zur jeweiligen Schutzimpfung, Inanspruchnahme der Grippeschutzimpfung und Ablehnungsgründen der COVID-19-Schutzimpfung befragt. COVID-19-Schutzimpfungsablehnende schätzten verglichen mit den anderen beiden Gruppen das Risiko einer Infektion für sich selbst und generell sowie die Wirksamkeit der Schutzimpfung am niedrigsten und das Risiko der Schutzimpfung am höchsten ein. Auch berichteten sie die niedrigste frühere Inanspruchnahme der Grippeschutzimpfung. Der wahrgenommene Druck zur Impfung erwies sich als relevante Barriere. Zukünftige Impfkampagnen sollten eine Balance zwischen Informationen zu Impfstoffen, der Notwendigkeit der Schutzimpfung und Freiwilligkeit der Inanspruchnahme erhalten.

We report a Leishmania infantum reactivation in an immunocompetent patient manifesting as visceral leishmaniasis with secondary IgA nephropathy nine years after an initial episode of mucosal leishmaniasis, which had been treated with liposomal amphotericin B.

The risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection is particularly high for healthcare workers during the pandemic. Home care workers visit many different households per shift. Encounters with mostly elderly patients and their relatives increase the potential for the undetected spread of SARS-CoV-2. In order to gain insight into the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and possible transmission risks in outpatient care, this follow-up study was conducted with nursing services in Hamburg. The aim was to estimate the dynamics of seroprevalence in this occupational group over a 12-month period, to identify occupation-specific risk factors, and to collect information on the vaccination status of the surveyed nursing staff. Antibody testing for SARS-CoV-2 IgG against the S1 domain (EUROIMUN Analyser I® Lübeck, Germany) was performed on participating healthcare workers with patient contact at a total of four time points within one year from July 2020 to October 2021 (baseline, follow-up after three, six and twelve months). The data were mostly analysed descriptively. Differences in IgG titres were analysed using variance analysis methods, particularly Tukey’s range test. The seroprevalence was 1.2% (8/678) at baseline and 1.5% (9/581) at the three-month follow-up (T1). At the second follow-up (T2) after six months, vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 was available from January 2021 onwards. The prevalence rate of positive IgG antibodies relative to the S1 domain of the spike protein test among unvaccinated individuals was 6.5%. At (T3) after twelve months (July to October 2021), 482 participants were enrolled, and 85.7% of the workers were considered fully vaccinated at this time point, while 51 individuals were unvaccinated. The prevalence was 13.7% (7/51). In our study, a low seroprevalence was found among home care workers, which was lower than in our studies conducted in the clinical setting. Therefore, it can be assumed that the occupational risk of infection is rather low for both the nursing staff and the patients/clients cared for in the outpatient setting. The good provision of protective equipment and the high vaccination rate of the staff probably had a positive influence.

The aim of this study was to define the breadth and specificity of dominant SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell epitopes using a comprehensive set of 135 overlapping 15-mer peptides covering the SARS-CoV-2 envelope (E), membrane (M) and nucleoprotein (N) in a cohort of 34 individuals with acute (n = 10) and resolved (n = 24) COVID-19. Following short-term virus-specific in vitro cultivation, the single peptide-specific CD4+ T cell response of each patient was screened using enzyme linked immuno spot assay (ELISpot) and confirmed by single-peptide intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) for interferon-γ (IFN-γ) production. 97% (n = 33) of patients elicited one or more N, M or E-specific CD4+ T cell responses and each patient targeted on average 21.7 (range 0–79) peptide specificities. Overall, we identified 10 N, M or E-specific peptides that showed a response frequency of more than 36% and five of them showed high binding affinity to multiple HLA class II binders in subsequent in vitro HLA binding assays. Three peptides elicited CD4+ T cell responses in more than 55% of all patients, namely Mem_P30 (aa146-160), Mem_P36 (aa176-190), both located within the M protein, and Ncl_P18 (aa86-100) located within the N protein. These peptides were further defined in terms of length and HLA restriction. Based on this epitope and restriction data we developed a novel DRB*11 tetramer (Mem_aa145-164) and examined the ex vivo phenotype of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ T cells in one patient. This detailed characterization of single T cell peptide responses demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 infection universally primes a broad T cell response directed against multiple specificities located within the N, M and E structural protein., Author summary The SARS-CoV-2 genome encodes for 25 different viral proteins. However, many immunological studies have focused on the immune response against the spike protein. This current study was designed to get a detailed understanding of the breadth and specificity of the CD4+ T cell response directed against the other structural proteins, namely the envelope (E), membrane (M) and nucleoprotein (N) using a comprehensive overlapping peptide set in a cohort of patients during early and resolved COVID-19. We detected a universally broad T cell response with on average more than 20 peptide responses per patient. Three peptides elicited CD4+ T cell responses in more than 55% of all patients, two located within the M protein, and one located within the N protein. These peptides were further defined in terms of length and HLA restriction, and we developed a novel MHC class II tetramer based on this data, which enabled us to investigate the ex vivo phenotype of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ T cells in one patient. This large immunological data set on individual immune responses will be useful for further detailed studies on the immunopathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccine design.

Even though several SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have shown high effectiveness in the prevention of COVID-19 in healthy subjects, vaccination response in patients with plasma-cell-related disorders (PCD) remains widely unknown. Here, we report on an analysis describing the serological response after prime-boost SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in PCD patients, as compared to a healthy control group, and on possible influencing factors of serological responses. Blood samples were analyzed for the presence of quantitative anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD Ig. A total of 82 patients were included; 67 received mRNA-, eight vector-based and four heterologous vaccinations. SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers (SP-AbT) were assessed in a mean of 23 days (SD ± 11 days) after the first and in a mean 21 days (SD ± 9) after prime-boost vaccination. A positive SP-AbT was detected in 31.9% of PCD patients after the first vaccination, and in 88.9% (44/49) after prime-boost vaccination, which was significantly less likely than that in the control group (100%, 78/78) (p = 0.008). Furthermore, we have been able to validate our previously suggested threshold of 30 CD19+ B lymphocytes/µL as being predictive for SP-AbT development. Despite anti-CD38 directed therapy, quadruplet treatment, higher age and missing deep remission, which correlated negatively with SP-AbT appearance, SP-AbT formation is possible in a majority of myeloma patients after prime-boost vaccination.

Background Vibrio spp. are aquatic bacteria that prefer warm seawater with moderate salinity. In humans, they can cause gastroenteritis, wound infections, and ear infections. During the summers of 2018 and 2019, unprecedented high sea surface temperatures were recorded in the German Baltic Sea. Aim We aimed to describe the clinical course and microbiological characteristics of Vibrio infections in Germany in 2018 and 2019. Methods We performed an observational retrospective multi-centre cohort study of patients diagnosed with domestically-acquired Vibrio infections in Germany in 2018 and 2019. Demographic, clinical, and microbiological data were assessed, and isolates were subjected to whole genome sequencing and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Results Of the 63 patients with Vibrio infections, most contracted the virus between June and September, primarily in the Baltic Sea: 44 (70%) were male and the median age was 65 years (range: 2–93 years). Thirty-eight patients presented with wound infections, 16 with ear infections, six with gastroenteritis, two with pneumonia (after seawater aspiration) and one with primary septicaemia. The majority of infections were attributed to V. cholerae (non–O1/non-O139) (n = 30; 48%) or V. vulnificus (n = 22; 38%). Phylogenetic analyses of 12 available isolates showed clusters of three identical strains of V. vulnificus, which caused wound infections, suggesting that some clonal lines can spread across the Baltic Sea. Conclusions During the summers of 2018 and 2019, severe heatwaves facilitated increased numbers of Vibrio infections in Germany. Since climate change is likely to favour the proliferation of these bacteria, a further increase in Vibrio-associated diseases is expected.

In this longitudinal cohort study, we assessed the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) seroconversion rates and analyzed the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine-induced immunity of 872 hospital workers at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf between May 11 and May 31, 2021. The overall seroprevalence of anti-NC-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was 4.7% (n=41), indicating low SARS-CoV-2 infection rates and persistent effectiveness of hospital-wide infection control interventions during the second and third wave of the pandemic. In total, 92.7% (n=808) out of the entire study cohort, 98.2% (n=325) of those who had been vaccinated once and all 393 individuals who had been vaccinated twice had detectable anti-S1-RBD-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers and no significant differences in vaccine-induced immune response were detected between male and female individuals and between different age groups. Vaccinated study participants with detectable anti-NC-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers (n=30) developed generally higher anti-S1-RBD-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers compared to anti-NC-SARS-CoV-2 negative individuals (n=694) (median titer: 7812 vs. 345 BAU/ml, p

Background Previous studies have documented a spectrum of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities in patients with cerebral malaria, but little is known about the prevalence of such abnormalities in patients with non-cerebral malaria. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of brain MRI findings in returning travellers with non-cerebral malaria. Methods A total of 17 inpatients with microscopically confirmed Plasmodium falciparum non-cerebral malaria underwent structural brain MRI at 3.0 Tesla, including susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI). Presence of imaging findings was recorded and correlated with clinical findings and parasitaemia. Results Structural brain abnormalities included a hyperintense lesion of the splenium on T2-weighted imaging (n = 3) accompanied by visible diffusion restriction (n = 2). Isolated brain microhaemorrhage was detected in 3 patients. T2-hyperintense signal abnormalities of the white matter ranged from absent to diffuse (n = 10 had 0–5 lesions, n = 5 had 5–20 lesions and 2 patients had more than 50 lesions). Imaging findings were not associated with parasitaemia or HRP2 levels. Conclusion Brain MRI reveals a considerable frequency of T2-hyperintense splenial lesions in returning travellers with non-cerebral malaria, which appears to be independent of parasitaemia.

In this study, we directly compared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients hospitalized during the first (27 February–28 July 2020) and second (29 July–31 December 2020) wave of the pandemic at a large tertiary center in northern Germany. Patients who presented during the first (n = 174) and second (n = 331) wave did not differ in age (median [IQR], 59 years [46, 71] vs. 58 years [42, 73], p = 0.82) or age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (median [IQR], 2 [1, 4] vs. 2 [0, 4], p = 0.50). During the second wave, a higher proportion of patients were treated as outpatients (11% [n = 20] vs. 20% [n = 67]), fewer patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (43% [n = 75] vs. 29% [n = 96]), and duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter (median days [IQR], 14 [8, 34] vs. 11 [5, 19], p &lt, 0.001). However, in-hospital mortality was high throughout the pandemic and did not differ between the two periods (16% [n = 27] vs. 16% [n = 54], p = 0.89). While novel treatment strategies and increased knowledge about the clinical management of COVID-19 may have resulted in a less severe disease course in some patients, in-hospital mortality remained unaltered at a high level. These findings highlight the unabated need for efforts to hamper severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission, to increase vaccination coverage, and to develop novel treatment strategies to prevent mortality and decrease morbidity.

So far, only a few reports about reinfections with SARS-CoV-2 have been published, and they often lack detailed immunological and virological data. We report about a SARS-CoV-2 reinfection with a genetically distinct SARS-CoV-2 variant in an immunocompetent female healthcare worker that has led to a mild disease course. No obvious viral escape mutations were observed in the second virus variant. The infectious virus was shed from the patient during the second infection episode despite the presence of neutralizing antibodies in her blood. Our data indicate that a moderate immune response after the first infection, but not a viral escape, did allow for reinfection and live virus shedding.

We sequentially assessed the presence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in 1253 hospital workers including 1026 HCWs at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf at three time points during the early phase of the epidemic. By the end of the study in July 2020, the overall seroprevalence was 1.8% (n = 22), indicating the overall effectiveness of infection control interventions in mitigating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in hospital workers.

Healthcare workers are among the most exposed and potentially most threatened populations of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Despite some reports on numbers of infections with SARS-CoV‑2 in German healthcare workers, the courses of their clinical presentation when affected by COVID-19 are not well described.In this contribution, characteristics and progressions of infected cases among healthcare workers at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic will be presented.Between 1 July and 28 July 2020, 67 healthcare workers, who previously tested positive for SARS-CoV‑2 via PCR, were invited via E‑mail to participate in an anonymous online questionnaire; 39 persons participated.Participants (58%) were mostly ≤ 39 years old (64%) and female (70%). Most healthcare workers were involved in direct patient management (85%), including contact with SARS-CoV‑2 positive patients (62%). All participants reported acute symptoms with a median duration of 19 days. The most frequent symptoms were fatigue (85%), anosmia (67%), cough (64%), headache (62%), and shortness of breath (51%). The disease course was mostly mild with low admission rates (5%). Ongoing symptoms lasting more than four weeks post-symptom-onset, particularly anosmia, fatigue, and shortness of breath, were reported by 38%. This group more frequently had pre-existing conditions (53% vs. 12%, p = 0.010), specifically hypertension (27% vs. 4%, p = 0.062).Healthcare workers reported mostly mild courses of COVID-19 despite increased contact with SARS-CoV-2 patients. However, some reported persistent symptoms months after infection.HINTERGRUND: Mitarbeitende in Gesundheitseinrichtungen sind direkt exponiert und damit besonders gefährdet in der anhaltenden COVID-19-Pandemie. Trotz diverser Berichte zu SARS-CoV-2-Infektionszahlen unter Mitarbeitenden deutscher Kliniken sind die Verläufe von COVID-19 bei dieser besonderen Population wenig beschrieben.In diesem Kurzbeitrag sollen die Merkmale und Verläufe von Infektionsfällen unter Mitarbeitenden am Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf in der ersten Welle der Pandemie dargestellt werden.Im Zeitraum 01.07.–28.07.2020 wurden 67 vormals positiv auf SARS-CoV‑2 getestete Mitarbeitende via E‑Mail eingeladen, in einem anonymen Onlinefragebogen detaillierte Angaben zum Krankheitsverlauf zu machen; 39 Personen nahmen teil.Die Teilnehmenden (58 %) waren überwiegend ≤ 39 Jahre alt (64 %) und weiblich (70 %). Die meisten berichteten über direkten Patientenkontakt (85 %), inklusive SARS-CoV-2-positiver Patient*innen (62 %). Die Beschwerden hielten im Median 19 Tage an. 85 % berichteten Fatigue, 67 % Geruchs- oder Geschmacksstörungen, 64 % Husten, 62 % Kopfschmerzen und 51 % Kurzatmigkeit. Die Verläufe waren überwiegend mild; 5 % wurden stationär behandelt. 38 % berichteten mehr als 4 Wochen nach Symptombeginn über anhaltende Beschwerden, insbesondere Geruchs- oder Geschmacksstörungen, Fatigue oder Kurzatmigkeit. Diese hatten häufiger Vorerkrankungen berichtet (53 % vs. 12 %, p = 0,010) und im Speziellen einen arteriellen Hypertonus (27 % vs. 4 %, p = 0,062).COVID-19-erkrankte Gesundheitsarbeitende berichteten trotz regelhafter Kontakte zu SARS-CoV-2-infizierten Patienten zum größten Teil über milde Verläufe. Ein Teil gab allerdings auch nach Monaten noch Symptome an.

In patients with hepatitis E virus (HEV) infections, extrahepatic, particularly renal and hematological manifestations, are increasingly reported in the medical literature but have never been studied compared to a control cohort. We retrospectively analyzed medical records of consecutive patients that were diagnosed with acute hepatitis E (AHE) (n = 69) or acute hepatitis A (AHA) (n = 46) at the University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf from January 2009 to August 2019 for demographical, clinical, and laboratory information. Patients with AHE had significantly lower median levels of ALAT (798 U/L) and total bilirubin (1.8 mg/dL) compared to patients with AHA (2326 U/L, p &lt, 0.001 and 5.2 mg/dL, 0.001), suggesting a generally less severe hepatitis. In contrast, patients with AHE had significantly higher median serum creatinine levels (0.9 mg/dL vs. 0.8 mg/dL, p = 0.002) and lower median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (91 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs. 109 mL/min/1.73 m2, 0.001) than patients with AHA. Leucocyte, neutrophil and lymphocyte count, hemoglobin, platelets, red cell distribution width (RDW), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and RDW to lymphocyte ratio (RLR) did not differ between patients with AHE and those with AHA. Our observations indicate that renal but not hematological interference presents an underrecognized extrahepatic feature of AHE, while inflammation of the liver seems to be more severe in AHA.

Serum creatinine levels before, during and after the acute phase of HEV infection

Highlights • Clinical performance of five different commercially available automated SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests. • No overlap of “false” positive samples between different serology assays was observed. • The ability to rule out acute SARS-CoV-2 infection at hospital admission with serology is limited., Background The global market for SARS-CoV-2-immunoassays is becoming ever more crowded with antibody-tests of various formats, targets and technologies, careful evaluation is crucial for understanding the implications of individual test results. Here, we evaluate the clinical performance of five automated immunoassays on a set of clinical samples. Methods Serum/plasma samples of 75 confirmed COVID-19 patients and 320 pre-pandemic serum samples of healthy blood donors were subjected to two IgG and three total antibody SARS-CoV-2-immunoassays. All test setups were automated workflows. Results Positivity of assays (onset of symptoms > 10 days) ranged between 68.4% and 81.6% (Diasorin 68.4%, Euroimmun 70.3%, Siemens 73.7%, Roche 79.0% and Wantai 81.6%). All examined assays demonstrated high specificity of >99% (Euroimmun, Diasorin: 99.1%, Wantai: 99.4%) but only two reached levels above 99.5% (Roche: 99.7%, Siemens 100%). Interestingly, there was no overlap in false positive results between the assays. The strongest correlation of quantitative results was observed between the Diasorin and Euroimmun IgG tests (r2 = 0.76). Overall, we observed no difference in the distribution of test results between female and male patients (p-values: 0.18-0.87). A significant difference between severely versus critically ill patients was demonstrated for the Euroimmun, Diasorin, Wantai and Siemens assays (p-values < 0.041). Conclusion All assays showed good clinical performance. Our data confirm that orthogonal test strategies as recommended by the CDC can enhance clinical specificity. However, the suboptimal rates of test positivity found at time of hospitalization in this cohort underline the importance of molecular diagnostics to rule out/confirm active infection with SARS-CoV-2.

ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness of multimodal infection control interventions in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infections in healthcare professionalsDesignSequential follow-up studySettingLargest tertiary care centre in northern GermanyParticipants1253 employees of the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf were sequentially assessed for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies at the beginning of the covid-19 epidemic (20 March – 9 April), one month (20 April – 8 May), and another two months later (22 June – 24 July). Of those, 1026 were healthcare workers (HCWs) of whom 292 were directly involved in the care of covid-19 patients. During the study period, infection control interventions were deployed, those included i) strict barrier nursing of all known covid-19 patients including FFP2 (N95) masks, goggles, gloves, hoods and protective gowns, ii) visitor restrictions with access control at all hospital entries, iii) mandatory wearing of disposable face masks in all clinical settings, and iv) universal RT-PCR admission screening of patients.Main Outcome MeasuresSARS-CoV-2 IgG seroconversion rateResultsAt the initial screening, ten participants displayed significant IgG antibody ratios. Another ten individuals showed seroconversion at the second time point one month later, only two further participants seroconverted during the subsequent two months. The overall SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in the study cohort at the last follow-up was 1.8%, the seroconversion rate dropped from 0.81% to 0.08% per month despite a longer observation period. Amongst HCWs seropositivity was increased in those directly involved in the care of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections (3.8%, n=11) compared to other HCWs (1.4%, n=10, P=0.025). However, after the adoption of all multimodal infection control interventions seroconversions were observed in only two more HCWs, neither of whom were involved in inpatient care.ConclusionMultimodal infection control and prevention interventions are highly effective in mitigating SARS-CoV-2 infections of healthcare professionals.

To determine epidemiological, clinical and laboratory characteristics of leptospirosis, 24 consecutive patients diagnosed with the infection between 2011 and 2017 at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf were retrospectively analyzed. The majority of patients were male travelers who returned from Southeast Asia and had a history of freshwater-associated activities. Considering the lack of discriminatory clinical or clinical chemistry parameters, leptospirosis should be regarded as differential diagnosis in any patient with acute febrile illness, especially with a history of travel to tropical and subtropical regions or freshwater exposure.