Search

PURPOSE: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a complex health condition requiring long-term rehabilitation. Person-centred goal-setting is a central component of rehabilitation. However, knowledge of patients' perspectives on the goal-setting in SCI rehabilitation is scarce. The purpose was therefore to explore patients' perspectives on goal-setting in multidisciplinary SCI rehabilitation.MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anthropological study combining participant-observation and individual interviews. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. The COREQ checklist was used to report study quality.RESULTS: Patients with SCI perceived goal-setting as ambiguous. On the one hand, they considered it insignificant, because it was complicated to transform complex needs of everyday life to recommended criteria of goals being measurable, specific, and realistic. On the other hand, they considered it a potentially useful guiding tool. Patients were uncertain of impact of goals and perceived goal-setting as vague during rehabilitation. Patient involvement was challenged by insufficient integration of patients' experience-based knowledge of everyday life and clinicians' profession-based knowledge.CONCLUSIONS: Goal-setting in rehabilitation is not the patients' need but they accept it as the clinicians' framework for rehabilitation. For goal-setting to become meaningful to patients with SCI, patient involvement should be strengthened by equally integrating the patients' perspectives in the goal-setting process.Implications for rehabilitationHealth-care professionals have to strengthen patient involvement in SCI rehabilitation by to a greater extent integrating the patients' knowledge of their everyday life and preferences rather than primarily focusing on profession-based knowledge.Health-care professionals must support patients in setting goals which are practically meaningful and relevant to the patients' everyday life and achievably and if needed go beyond the structured measurement of SMART goals.In an acknowledgement of the dynamic nature of goal-setting, clinicians should emphasise formulating goals in a flexible and non-directive manner, thereby providing room for patients' changing needs and challenges over time.Goals in SCI rehabilitation cover a wide range from broad, value-based goals to more specific goals, and the health-care professionals must ensure inclusion of such a wide range of goals.

Objective To explore health-care use in the 12 months preceding a diagnosis of RA in Denmark. Methods We conducted a population-based cohort study using data from national registries. Every patient diagnosed with RA in 2014–18 was matched to 10 reference individuals without RA from the Danish background population. Health-care use was defined as contacts to general practitioners, contacts to private practicing physiotherapists, and X-rays of hands and/or feet performed in primary or secondary care. We estimated the monthly contact rates for patients and references in the 12 months preceding the diagnosis, and we compared incidence rates for health-care use in each month between the two groups while adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and comorbidity. Results We included 7427 patients with RA and 74 270 references. Patients with RA had increasing contact rates with general practitioners and physiotherapists from 6 to 8 months before the diagnosis. Compared with references, women with RA had statistically significantly more contacts to general practitioners and physiotherapists during all 12 months. A similar contact pattern was seen in men, albeit less distinct. The number of X-rays increased slightly from 8 months before the diagnosis, with a steep increase in the last 3 months. Conclusion Increased contacts to general practitioners and physiotherapists were seen in all 12 months preceding the RA diagnosis, intensifying in the last 6 to 8 months. Imaging increased from 3 months before the diagnosis. This indicates an opportunity to expedite referral to specialist care and ensure earlier diagnosis of RA.

Aims Return to work and employment maintenance following cardiovascular disease (CVD) are important rehabilitation goals for people of working age. To identify people in particular need of vocational rehabilitation, we examined differences in return to work and subsequent detachment from employment among people with atrial fibrillation (AF), heart failure (HF), heart valve disease, and ischaemic heart disease. Methods and results We conducted a nationwide cohort study and included all individuals of working age (35–65 years) who were employed when diagnosed with incident CVD in 2018. We estimated sex- and age-standardized probabilities of remaining employed at 3, 6, and 12 months after diagnosis, and of detachment from employment within 6 months after having returned to work. Of 46 912 individuals diagnosed in 2018, 8187 were of working age and employed at diagnosis. The mean age was 54.7 years (SD = 6.7), and 74.0% were men. Within 1 year, 89.8% had returned to work, but within the subsequent 6 months, 23.5% of these experienced detachment from employment. At 3, 6, and 12 months after diagnosis the highest standardized probability of being employed was found among people with AF, whereas the lowest probability was found among people with HF {78.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 77.3–80.4] vs. 62.2% [95% CI: 59.0–65.4] at 12 months}. Similarly, the highest probability of detachment was found for people with HF [30.3% (95% CI: 26.9–33.7)]. Conclusion People with HF present the highest probability of not returning to work. There is a need for developing and documenting effects of vocational rehabilitation strategies within comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation programmes.

Objective: Telehealth is rapidly gaining ground from usual treatment, not least because of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) measures. Within rheumatology, telehealth has been used for, inter alia, follow-up for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with low disease activity or in remission. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of such a telehealth intervention. Method: In a randomized controlled trial, 294 patients were randomized into patient-reported outcome-based telehealth follow-up by either a nurse (PRO-TN) or a rheumatologist (PRO-TR) or to conventional outpatient follow-up (control). Cost-effectiveness was evaluated using costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Individual-level healthcare and productivity costs were retrieved from national Danish registers. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated for the intervention groups compared to the control group. Bootstrapping with 10 000 replications was used to obtain confidence intervals. Furthermore, cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were generated. Results: The cost comparison showed that PRO-TR was significantly less costly than the control group, whereas the relative reduction in costs for PRO-TN was not significant. The telehealth groups experienced minor, non-significant declines in QALYs, whereas the control group experienced a slight, non-significant increase. The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that for PRO-TR, the willingness to accept a QALY loss was 89 328 EUR. A similar but smaller and non-significant result was seen for PRO-TN. Conclusion: PRO-TR and PRO-TN seem to cost less but provide broadly similar health outcomes compared with conventional follow-up. Between the intervention groups, PRO-TR was significantly less costly. More studies are needed to conclude whether rheumatologist- or nurse-led telehealth is more cost-effective than conventional follow-up.

Background. Cohabitation status and educational attainment affect a number of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and also CVD incidence and mortality. However, little is known about social inequality in CVD risk factors in married or cohabiting (married/cohabiting) individuals with CVD. Following this married/cohabiting individuals with CVD and low educational attainment may be an overlooked group with an increased risk of recurrent CVD events. The aim of this study was to address social inequality in health among married/cohabiting individuals with CVD by examining educational differences in health behaviour, mental health and health literacy. Methods. Register data on CVD and cohabitation status were linked with self-reported health behaviour, mental health and one dimension of health literacy (the ability to understand health information) from the population-based health survey "How are you?" carried out in Central Denmark Region in 2017. Self-reported educational attainment was used as a marker for social position. In total, 20,585 (69%) participants aged 45 years and above completed the questionnaire. The analytical sample in this study consisted of 1,794 married/cohabiting individuals with CVD. Results. Married/cohabiting individuals with CVD and low educational attainment had higher adjusted odds for daily smoking (AOR 3.31, 95% CI 1.87;5.87), physical inactivity (AOR 2.10, 95% CI 1.37;3.22), unhealthy diet (AOR 6.37, 95% CI 3.29;12.3) and obesity (AOR 2.55, 95% CI 1.60;4.07) than their high educational attainment counterparts. Furthermore, they had higher levels of perceived stress (Aβ 2.31, 95% CI 1.19;3.43) and lower levels of health literacy (Aβ -0.26, 95% CI -0.36;-0.16) and mental health-related quality of life (Aβ -1.80, 95% CI -3.53;-0.07). Finally, they had lower adjusted odds for moderate/high risk alcohol intake (AOR 0.35, 95% CI 0.20;0.60). Conclusion. We found increased CVD risk factors and thus increased risk of recurrent CVD events in married/cohabiting individuals with CVD and low educational attainment compared to married/cohabiting individuals with CVD and high educational attainment. The social inequality in health behaviour, mental health and health literacy among married/cohabiting individuals with CVD should be addressed in both public health strategies, targeted secondary prevention, treatment and rehabilitation.

PURPOSE: Spinal cord injury is a complex condition requiring long-term rehabilitation. Goal-setting is considered an essential part of rehabilitation, however, knowledge of how goal-setting is practised across health-care professions, settings and diagnoses are scarce. The purpose of the study was therefore to explore health-care professionals' perspectives on goal-setting practice in outpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation targeting patients with spinal cord injury.MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anthropological study combining participant-observation and focus group interviews. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. COREQ checklist was used to report the study quality.RESULTS: Health-care professionals experienced a field of tension between internationally recommended goal-setting criteria, requiring goals to be specific, measurable, realistic and time-based, and a practice influenced by patients presenting complex needs. The challenges were managed using a negotiation strategy characterized by a tinkering approach to adjust notions of measurability, realism and time frame into practice. Also, health-care professionals were challenged in relation to practising a person-centred rehabilitation approach.CONCLUSIONS: We suggest rethinking the goal-setting process by allowing recommended goal-setting criteria to be adapted to a specific practice context while acknowledging goal-setting practice in its variety and flexibility as a strength. Furthermore, improved incorporation of patients' perspectives in the practice is needed. Implications for rehabilitationTo strengthen person-centred rehabilitation practice, clinicians should actively search for and engage patient-identified needs and preferences in shared goal-setting.Standard criteria of goal-setting should comply with the individual and specific participation in the everyday life of patients with SCI.SMART goals are not always the right way to formulate rehabilitation goals.A flexible and pragmatic approach is needed to reach a balance between the patients' complex needs and the recommendations for goals to be specific, measurable, realistic, and time-based.

The International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) was approved in 2001 and, since then, several studies reported the increased interest about its use in different sectors. A recent overview that summarizes its applications is lacking. This study aims to provide an updated overview about 20 years of ICF application through an international online questionnaire, developed by the byline authors, and sent to each World Health Organization Collaborating Centers of the Family of International Classifications (WHO-FIC CCs). Data was collected during October 2020 and December 2021 and descriptive content analyses were used to report main results. Results show how, in most of the respondent countries represented by WHO-FIC CCs, ICF was mainly used in clinical practice, policy development and social policy, and in education areas. Despite its applications in different sectors, ICF use is not mandatory in most countries but, where used, it provides a biopsychosocial framework for policy development in health, functioning and disability. The study provides information about the needs related to ICF applications, that can be useful to organize targeted intervention plans. Furthermore, this survey methodology can be re-proposed periodically to monitor the use of the ICF in the future.

ObjectivesHigh socioeconomic status (SES) has been linked to high referral for cardiac rehabilitation (CR). However, the impact of SES on CR utilisation from enrolment to completion is unclear. The objective of this study was to examine whether indicators of SES are associated with not taking up and dropout from CR.DesignA population-based, follow-up study.SettingHospitals and primary healthcare centres in the Central Denmark Region.ParticipantPatients diagnosed with ischaemic heart disease (IHD) in the hospital and referred for rehabilitation in the primary healthcare setting from 1 September 2017 to 31 August 2018 (n=2018).VariablesFour SES indicators (education, disposable family income, occupation and cohabitant status) were selected because of their established association with cardiovascular health and CR utilisation. Patients were followed up regarding no uptake of or dropout from CR in the primary healthcare setting.Statistical methodsThe associations between the four SES indicators and either no uptake or dropout from CR were analysed using logistic regression with adjustment for age, sex, nationality and comorbidity.ResultsOverall, 25% (n=507) of the referred patients did not take up CR and 24% (n=377) of the participators dropped out the CR. All adjusted ORs, except one (education/dropout) demonstrated that low SES compared with high are statistically significantly associated with higher odds of not taking up CR and dropout from CR. The ORs ranged from 1.52, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.04 (education/no uptake) to 2.36, 95% CI 1.60 to 3.46 (occupation/dropout).ConclusionsThis study highlights that indicators of SES are important markers of CR utilisation following hospitalisation for IHD.

To present the process used to develop the low back pain (LBP) assessment tool including evaluation of the initial content validity of the tool. The development process comprised the elements: definition of construct and content, literature search, item generation, needs assessment, piloting, adaptations, design, and technical production. The LBP assessment tool was developed to assess the construct “functioning and disability” as defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Involvement of patients and health professionals was essential. The elements were collapsed into five steps. In total, 18 patients and 12 health professionals contributed to the content and the design of the tool. The LBP assessment tool covered all ICF components shared among 63 ICF categories. This study presents the process used to develop the LBP assessment tool, which is the first tool to address all ICF components and integrate biopsychosocial perspectives provided by patients and health professionals in the same tool. Initial evaluation of content validity showed adequate reflection of the construct “functioning and disability”. Further work on the way will evaluate comprehensiveness, acceptability, and degree of implementation of the LBP assessment tool to strengthen its use for clinical practice.Implications for RehabilitationA biopsychosocial and patients-centred approach is a strong foundation for identifying the many relevant aspects related to low back pain (LBP).Responding to a lack of tools to support a biopsychosocial and patients-centred approach the LBP assessment tool was developed using a robust, multi-step process with involvement of patients and health professionals.The LBP assessment tool is a strong candidate for a user-friendly tool to facilitate use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in routine clinical practice. A biopsychosocial and patients-centred approach is a strong foundation for identifying the many relevant aspects related to low back pain (LBP). Responding to a lack of tools to support a biopsychosocial and patients-centred approach the LBP assessment tool was developed using a robust, multi-step process with involvement of patients and health professionals. The LBP assessment tool is a strong candidate for a user-friendly tool to facilitate use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in routine clinical practice.

To evaluate comprehensiveness and acceptability of the patient-reported outcome instrument (PRO-LBP) and the clinician-reported outcome instrument (ClinRO-LBP) included in the low back pain (LBP) assessment tool. Second, to assess degree of implementation after three months. Feasibility-testing, training of health professionals, field-testing, and a feedback meeting was undertaken. Field-testing provided data to evaluate comprehensiveness, acceptability, and degree of implementation. Feasibility-testing and training of health professionals revealed that the LBP assessment tool was usable and ready for field-testing. In total, 152 patients participated in the field-testing of whom 95% considered the PRO-LBP comprehensive and 59% found it acceptable. Health professionals found the ClinRO-LBP comprehensive and acceptable. The feedback meeting revealed that the LBP assessment tool broadened the health professionals’ approach to functioning and facilitated a consultation based on the patient perspective. The degree of implementation reached 79%. The PRO-LBP and the ClinRO-LBP covered key concepts of LBP and were found acceptable by patients and health professionals. Despite the reduced degree of implementation after three months the LBP assessment tool allowed the health professionals to apply a biopsychosocial and patient-centred approach. Future research should investigate whether the LBP assessment can enhance patient-centred care.Implications for rehabilitationThe low back pain (LBP) assessment tool is the first evidence-based tangible tool to cover biopsychosocial aspects related to LBP as defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).The LBP assessment tool allowed health professionals to apply a biopsychosocial and patients-centred approach and has the potential to be used in rehabilitation planning.Awareness to continuous facilitation and training of health professionals is important to facilitate and maintain implementation of new procedures into routine clinical practice. The low back pain (LBP) assessment tool is the first evidence-based tangible tool to cover biopsychosocial aspects related to LBP as defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). The LBP assessment tool allowed health professionals to apply a biopsychosocial and patients-centred approach and has the potential to be used in rehabilitation planning. Awareness to continuous facilitation and training of health professionals is important to facilitate and maintain implementation of new procedures into routine clinical practice.

The demand for rehabilitation has increased, and evidence is rapidly growing; however, a rehabilitative health strategy receives less attention than treatment. Knowledge of what is being researched, who are the target groups and who contributes to rehabilitation research is deficient. We did not find any reviews mapping rehabilitation research regarding the research questions. The objective was to identify and synthesize existing scientific evidence on rehabilitation research published by Danish institutions between 2001 and 2021. The research questions to be explored were: Among which study groups has rehabilitation research been published?. Which types of studies on rehabilitation have been published?. Which institutions have been involved in rehabilitation research?MethodsThe process was guided according to the Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI's) scoping review methodology. Four databases were searched. All types of peer-reviewed studies on any target group and rehabilitation setting, with any affiliation to a Danish institution, were eligible to be included. Studies referring to population and the type of design were categorized. Institutions were counted as Danish first authorship.ResultsThe search revealed 3,100 studies, and following screening 1,779 were included. A total of 24 broad study groups were identified, mostly diagnosis-based health conditions. Musculoskeletal, cancer, and cardiac had 342, 228, and 174 studies, respectively. A total of 1,545 had a Danish first authorship, most of the Danish publications came from hospitals (56.6%) and universities (28.4%). The publication trend showed an almost linear development, with a 10–15% increase during the period.ConclusionFollowing screening 1,779 studies were included involving 24 broad study groups. Most categories were diagnosis-based; musculoskeletal, cancer, and cardiac health conditions encompassed most studies. All study designs were represented, and 1/10 were secondary studies. The majority (87%) of studies had a Danish first authorship. The majority of first affiliations were among hospitals followed by universities. A few municipalities were presented although they are yet to have research responsibility. Publication trends showed an increase primarily from 2013.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://osf.io/, identifier [10.17605/OSF.IO/2AENX].

BackgroundCardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a class 1A recommendation and an integrated part of standard treatment for patients with cardiac disease. In Denmark, CR adheres to European guidelines, it is group-based and partly conducted in primary health settings. Despite high evidence for the benefits of CR, it remains underutilized. How to facilitate CR adherence in primary health settings is poorly understood.AimThis study explores health professional's perspectives on how to facilitate CR adherence for patients with ischaemic heart disease in primary health settings.MethodsData were collected through focus group discussions. Respondents were health professionals specialized in and working with CR in primary health settings. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.ResultsEleven health professionals participated in two focus group discussions. Five themes emerged as facilitators of CR; (1) placing the person at the center, (2) coherent programme, (3) flow of information, (4) contextual factors, and (5) feeling of belonging.ConclusionThis study illuminates the complexity of facilitating adherence to CR in primary health settings and provides ways in which health professionals may facilitate adherence. Placing the person at the center is pivotal and may be done by adapting CR offers to patients' social context, culture and life circumstances and ensuring a feeling of belonging. The rhetoric related to CR should be positive and throughout the entire course of treatment health professionals should possess a generic and collective approach to and view of CR. Perceiving these elements as potential facilitators is of vital importance and addressing them may facilitate adherence.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common cause of non-traumatic disability in people aged 10 to 65 years. Evidence exists for the effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation and exercise. However, the effectiveness of other rehabilitation approaches in MS needs further evaluation.OBJECTIVE: We aimed to systematically synthesize and evaluate knowledge on effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions and determinants for participation among people with MS (pwMS) to inform clinical guidelines on rehabilitation.METHODS: Joanna Briggs Institute methodology was used. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched for reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses published during 2009-2019. All types of rehabilitation interventions provided to pwMS at any time and in all settings were eligible. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. The most recently published reviews on mixed and specific modalities were included. The findings were reported in a narrative summary and a mixed-methods analysis.RESULTS: Among 108 eligible reviews, 6 qualitative or mixed-methods reviews and 66 quantitative reviews were included (total pwMS >90,000). This overview provides solid evidence for the effectiveness of a spectrum of modalities. Among the modalities, there was strong evidence for the effectiveness of multidisciplinary, cognitive and exercise approaches, physiotherapy, and occupational therapy, including full body training on functioning, and participation outcomes. Employment significantly affected quality of life; thus, vocational rehabilitation should be initiated early. Healthcare professionals should identify personal factors including relations and coping, and the rehabilitation process should involve partners or close family.CONCLUSIONS: The mixed-methods analysis revealed insufficient consensus between the perspectives of pwMS on their rehabilitation and reported effects, indicating that further research should target the experiences of pwMS. Furthermore, rehabilitation should be patient-centred, focus on the complexity of needs, and be organised and performed by an experienced multidisciplinary team. Evidence-based rehabilitation should be initiated early after pwMS are diagnosed and follow international guidelines. Database registration. PROSPERO ID (CRD42020152422).

Aim: To understand healthcare providers’ experiences with video recording of patient consultations. Background: Video recordings have been recognised to be an effective method to evaluate in situ interactions in clinical practice. The video recordings are often conducted by researchers, but active involvement of healthcare providers into the process of recording is evolving. Still, little is known of how video recordings by healthcare providers may influence daily clinical practice and potentials for direct use to guide practice development. Methods: A qualitative design was used, conducting two focus group interviews including 12 healthcare providers representing eight different healthcare services who provide municipal cardiac rehabilitation. Interpretive description was used as the methodological framework, and symbolic interactionism served as the theoretical lens. Findings: Three themes were identified reflecting healthcare providers’ experiences with video recording of patient consultations: ‘Concerns of compromising primary work tasks’, ‘Exposing professional and personal skills’ and ‘A new learning dimension’. Overall, the three themes represent the process of video recording own practices attached to patient consultations and the personal investment attached to the video data. Also, how the recordings may provide new insights for practice development in terms of individual and team-based performance in patient consultations. Conclusion: Video recordings by healthcaref providers may be a useful source to provide information and learning about patient consultation practice to use in research and supervision, keeping in mind their challenges of implementation into daily clinical practice.

PURPOSE: To translate and cross-culturally adapt the Challenge, and investigate the reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) of the Danish Challenge in children with cerebral palsy (CP).MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Danish version of the Challenge was created through a standardized translation process. Four physiotherapists evaluated face validity. Independently ambulatory children with CP were tested. Live performance rating was conducted by assessors independently scoring the Challenge. Video-rating was undertaken for a subset of assessments. Same day assessment test-retest reliability was estimated. The Challenge's Best Score Total was of primary interest.RESULTS: Forty-five children (5-18 years: mean 10 years 9 months; 19 girls) in Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I and II were tested. Inter-rater reliability was excellent for live assessments (n = 45) ICC = 0.998 (95% CI 0.998-0.999) and video assessments (n = 15) ICC = 0.991 (95% CI 0.963-0.997) and intra-rater reliability was excellent for live versus video-recorded assessments (n = 10) ICC = 0.977 (95% CI 0.895-0.994). Test-retest reliability (n = 22) was excellent with ICC = 0.991 (95% CI 0.979-0.996) and minimal detectable change (MDC90) of 4.7 points.CONCLUSIONS: The Danish Challenge showed excellent reliability in this testing context when physiotherapists scored from live- or video-recorded assessments. The Challenge's ability to detect 4.7 points change seems a clinically realistic target for progress. Clinical trial registration: This trial has been approved by the Data Protection Agency, Central Region Denmark, Ref nr.: 615216, Case nr.: 1-16-02-46-16. Registration date: 01-01-2016.Implications for rehabilitationThe Challenge remained reliable and maintained a promising minimal detectable change of less than five points after translation and cultural adaptation.The Danish version of the Challenge 20-item version can be used to measure advanced motor skill performance in children with cerebral palsy, GMFCS level I and GMFCS level II.Challenge live scoring is as reliable as the more time-consuming video-recorded scoring, meaning that physiotherapists can choose the method that fits best with their clinical context and preference.

BackgroundCardiac rehabilitation (CR) and medical treatment are integrated parts of the intervention for cardiac patients and are a class 1A recommendation. However, CR dropout is reported to be relatively high and little is known about the reasons for CR dropout in primary health settings.AimThis study investigates causes for CR dropout through a qualitative audit of medical charts among patients with ischaemic heart disease.MethodsThis was a qualitative retrospective audit of patient's medical charts. Patients who dropped out from CR between 1 January and 31 December 2018 in five primary health settings were included. Local patient charts provided information related to causes and formed the basis of the analysis. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.ResultsA total of 690 patients were referred for and commenced CR and 199 (29%) dropped out. Twenty-five (12.6%) patients finished CR but were excluded due to standards of ≥180 days between CR meetings, leaving 118 patients included. Four themes as causes for patient's dropout were identified: (1) CR-programmes, (2) logistical, (3) intrapersonal and (4) clinical factors.ConclusionThis study identified new focus areas to which health professionals may attend in reducing drop-out from CR. Organisation of CR, challenges with combining labor market attachment and CR, focus on patient education and comorbidities. The results underline the importance of health professionals emphasizing the benefits of CR and explains that CR enhances long-term labor market attachment. Furthermore, health professionals should encourage participation in patient education and adapt exercise to the individual patient's potential.

Background Adherence and completion of programmes in educational and physical exercise sessions is essential in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) to obtain the known benefits on morbidity, mortality, risk factors, lifestyle, and quality of life. The patient education strategy “Learning and Coping” (LC) has been reported to positively impact adherence and completion in a hospital setting. It is unknown if LC has impact on adherence in primary healthcare settings, and whether LC improves self-management. The aim of this pragmatic primary healthcare-based study was to examine whether patients attending CR based on LC had a better adherence to patient education and physical exercise, higher program completion rate, and better self-management compared to patients attending CR based on a consultation program Empowerment, Motivation and Medical Adherence (EMMA). Method A pragmatic cluster-controlled trial of two types of patient education LC and EMMA including ten primary healthcare settings and 514 patients (LC, n = 266; EMMA, n = 248) diagnosed with ischaemic heart disease discharged from hospital and referred to CR between August 1, 2018 and July 31, 2019. Adherence was defined as participation in ≥ 75% of provided sessions. Completion was defined as patients attended the final interview at the end of the 12-weeks programme. Patient Activation Measure (PAM) was used to obtain information on a person's knowledge, skills and confidence for self-management. PAM questionnaire was completed at baseline and 12-weeks follow-up. Multiple and Linear regression analyses adjusted for potential confounder variables and cluster effect were performed. Result Patients who followed CR based on LC had a higher adherence rate to educational and physical exercise sessions compared to patients who followed CR based on EMMA (p 0.05). At 12-weeks, there was no statistical differences in PAM-score between clusters (p > 0.05). Conclusion This study indicates that the LC positively impacts adherence in CR compared to EMMA. We found non-significant difference in completing CR and in patient self-management between the two types of patient education. Future studies are needed to investigate if the higher adherence rate achieved by LC in primary healthcare settings translates into better health outcomes.

Objectives Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability and a global public health concern. Studies indicate that pain self-efficacy is associated with the development of disability in chronic LBP (CLBP) patients. The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) is a commonly used questionnaire to assess pain self-efficacy in patients with CLBP. It is essential to examine the psychometric properties of the PSEQ in the population in which it is to be used. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability and smallest detectable change of the Danish version of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-DK) in patients with CLBP before implementing it as an outcome measure in an inpatient rehabilitation context. Methods This observational study including 92 patients with CLBP was conducted in a multidisciplinary rehabilitation facility in Denmark. The psychometric properties statistically tested included reliability, smallest detectable change and floor and ceiling effect of the PSEQ-DK. Results The reliability analysis included 92 patients and revealed an weighted kappa of 0.82 (95% Cl 0.75; 0.88) and Intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.83 (95% CI 0.75; 0.88), which corresponds to a good reliability. The smallest detectable change was 12.67. Conclusions The present study demonstrated that the PSEQ-DK had a good reliability in patients with CLBP in an inpatient rehabilitation context. The current results expand our knowledge of the reliability and smallest detectable change of the PSEQ-DK. In order to implement PSEQ-DK in a rehabilitation context for evaluative purposes future studies should focus on examining responsiveness and interpretability.

Introduction: The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is designed to measure functioning and disability in six domains. It is included in the International Classification of Diseases 11th revision (ICD-11). The objective of the study was to examine the construct validity of WHODAS 2.0 and describe its clinical utility for the assessment of functioning and disability among older patients discharged from emergency departments (EDs).Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study is based on data from 129 older patients. Patients completed the 36-item version of WHODAS 2.0 together with the Barthel-20, the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS), Timed Up and Go (TUG), and the 30-Second Chair Stand Test (30 s-CST). Construct validity was examined through hypothesis testing by correlating the WHODAS with the other instruments and specifically the mobility domain in WHODAS 2.0 with the TUG and 30 s-CST tests. The clinical utility of WHODAS 2.0 was explored through floor/ceiling effect and missing item responses.Results: WHODAS 2.0 correlated fair with Barthel-20 (r = −0.49), AMPS process skills (r = −0.26) and TUG (r=0.30) and correlated moderate with AMPS motor skills (r = −0.58) and 30s-CST (r = −0.52). The WHODAS 2.0 mobility domain correlated fair with TUG (r = 0.33) and moderate with 30s-CST (r = −0.60). Four domains demonstrated floor effect: D1 “Cognition,” D3 “Self-care,” D4 “Getting along,” and D5 “Household.” Ceiling effect was not identified. The highest proportion of missing item responses were present for Item 3.4 (Staying by yourself for a few days), Item 4.4 (Making new friends), and Item 4.5 (Sexual activities).Conclusion: WHODAS 2.0 had fair-to-moderate correlations with Barthel-20, AMPS, TUG, and 30s-CST and provides additional aspects of disability compared with commonly used instruments. However, the clinical utility of WHODAS 2.0 applied to older patients discharged from EDs poses some challenges due to floor effect and missing item responses. Accordingly, patient and health professional perspectives need further investigation.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of adding four weeks preoperative progressive resistance training (PRT) to four weeks postoperative PRT on patient function, muscle strength, and other outcomes 12 months after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Design: Twelve-month follow-up data from a previously published randomized controlled trial. Setting: Aarhus University Hospital, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, and Aarhus University. Subjects: A total of 59 patients scheduled for TKA were enrolled in a single-blinded, clinical randomized controlled trial. Interventions: Participants were randomized to preoperative PRT (intervention group) or to a control group who “lived as usual” the last four weeks before TKA. The intervention group completed four weeks preoperative and four weeks postoperative PRT, whereas the control group only completed four weeks postoperative PRT. Main follow-up measures were as follows: the 30-second Chair Stand Test (primary outcome), Timed Up and Go Test, walk tests, knee extensor, and knee flexor muscle strength and patient-reported outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Results: No significant group differences were observed for the primary outcome 30-second Chair Stand Test (4.0 repetitions versus 2.4 repetitions, P = 0.067) or for other functional performance outcomes. The intervention group had significantly higher weight-normalized knee extensor muscle strength (0.5 Nm/kg versus 0.2 Nm/kg, P = 0.002) and knee flexor muscle strength (0.3 Nm/kg versus 0.2 Nm/kg, P = 0.042) in the operated leg when compared to the control group. No significant group differences for patient-reported outcomes. Conclusion: The study supports the use of short-term high-intensity resistance training before TKA as it induces a long-lasting effect on muscle strength, while it may have no discernible effect on functional performance.

To translate and cross-culturally adapt theA Danish version of theForty-five children (5-18 years: mean 10 years 9 months; 19 girls) in Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I and II were tested. Inter-rater reliability was excellent for live assessments (The Danish

Objective:To compare the long-term effectiveness of an integrated rehabilitation programme with an existing rehabilitation programme, in terms of back-specific disability, in patients with chronic low back pain.Design:A single-centre, pragmatic, two-arm parallel, randomised controlled trial.Setting:A rheumatology rehabilitation centre in Denmark.Subjects:A total of 165 adults (aged ⩾ 18 years) with chronic low back pain.Interventions:An integrated programme (a pre-admission day, two weeks at home, two weeks inpatient followed by home-based activities, plus two 2-day inpatient booster sessions, and six-month follow-up visit) was compared with an existing programme (four-week inpatient, and six-month follow-up visit).Main measure:The primary outcome was disability measured using the Oswestry Disability Index after one year. Secondary outcomes included pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale), pain self-efficacy (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire), health-related quality of life (EuroQol-5 Domain 5-level (EQ-5D)), and depression (Major Depression Inventory). Analysis was by intention-to-treat, using linear mixed models.Results:303 patients were assessed for eligibility of whom 165 patients (mean age 50 years (SD 13) with a mean Oswestry Disability Index score of 42 (SD 11)) were randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to the integrated programme ( n = 82) or the existing programme ( n = 83). The mean difference (integrated programme minus existing programme) in disability was –0.53 (95% CI –4.08 to 3.02); p = 0.770). No statistically significant differences were found in the secondary outcomes.Conclusion:The integrated programme was not more effective in reducing long-term disability in patients with chronic low back pain than the existing programme.

Since its publication in 2001 the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) has attracted debate about the content and the model presented. After almost 20 years use, regular updating since 2008 and with the prospect of a new edition in 2020 there is increasing interest in the ICF as a tool to meet contemporary information requirements. Information on functioning is important across not only health systems, but all areas where change in functioning is important: education, employment, and social welfare for example. This commentary responds to the issues raised in a commentary by Mitra & Shakespeare in 2019 and supports review of the ICF in the current context by informing users and providers of data on human functioning how they might engage in the maintenance, updating, and modernisation of the ICF.

PURPOSE: Work-related issues have become increasingly relevant for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, since the cancer is detected at an earlier age due to screening. The aim was to evaluate work participation up to 10 years after colon or rectal cancer diagnosis compared between diagnosis and to a matched cancer-free population.METHODS: In this national register-based cohort study, all first-time CRC patients in the period 2000-2015 with no previous cancer, between 20 and 60 years, were identified in the Danish Cancer Registry. A control group with no previous cancer was matched on gender, age, education, and income. For each year a mean Work Participation Score (WPS) was calculated (a percentage of weeks working) for individuals part of the labour market.RESULTS: A total of 5625 colon cancer patients and 3856 rectal cancer patients and 25,341 and 17,256 matched controls were included in the study, respectively. The WPS increased for colon cancer patients from 45.69% after 1 year to 83.94% after 4 years, while rectal cancer patients had a score of 38.07% after 1 year and 80.07% after 4 years. The WPS was lower for cancer patients compared with controls, but the difference decreased after 4 years.CONCLUSION: CRC patients had a lower work participation up to 10 years after diagnosis compared with controls, while rectal cancer patients had a lower participation the first 7 years after diagnosis compared with colon cancer patients.IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Work-related issues should be considered in the early stage of rehabilitation to increase work participation and thereby improve quality of life.

The COVID-19 pandemic provides the opportunity to re-think health policies and health systems approaches by the adoption of a biopsychosocial perspective, thus acting on environmental factors so as to increase facilitators and diminish barriers. Specifically, vulnerable people should not face discrimination because of their vulnerability in the allocation of care or life-sustaining treatments. Adoption of biopsychosocial model helps to identify key elements where to act to diminish effects of the pandemics. The pandemic showed us that barriers in health care organization affect mostly those that are vulnerable and can suffer discrimination not because of severity of diseases but just because of their vulnerability, be this age or disability and this can be avoided by biopsychosocial planning in health and social policies. It is possible to avoid the banality of evil, intended as lack of thinking on what we do when we do, by using the emergence of the emergency of COVID-19 as a Trojan horse to achieve some of the sustainable development goals such as universal health coverage and equity in access, thus acting on environmental factors is the key for global health improvement.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study nested in a randomized controlled trial.BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of pain and disability globally. Few prognostic factors are consistently reported to predict outcome in patients with LBP and findings from clinical examination and physical task performance levels (e.g. walking distance) lack prognostic value. However, recent findings suggest measuring patients' pain sensitivity to task performance tests (task-specific sensitivity) may be of predictive value.OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prognostic value of task-specific sensitivity in patients with LBP by exploring whether task-specific sensitivity during physical function testing is associated with self-reported change in pain and disability.METHODS: The study included 260 patients with LBP, referred for evaluation in secondary care setting. All patients completed questionnaires and underwent clinical examination by a physiotherapist. Patients rated their pain intensity before and after completing a test battery measuring physical function and were classified into four categories; worse, unchanged, better or no pain, depending on their pain response. At 3-month follow-up, outcomes were obtained by a postal questionnaire.RESULTS: Task-specific sensitivity significantly predicted pain, when adjusting for known prognostic factors. Patients classified as no pain, better and unchanged improved significantly more in pain score compared to patients classified as worse. Patients classified as no pain also improved significantly more in disability score compared to patients classified as worse after adjusting for known prognostic factors.CONCLUSION: Measuring task-specific sensitivity is predictive of pain intensity after 3 months in patients with LBP. The prognostic value appears limited in respect to disability.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognosis, level 1b. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, Epub 30 Oct 2019. doi:10.2519/jospt.2020.8953.