Search

Basilar artery occlusion is rare, accounting for approximately 1% of strokes. Symptoms range from paresthesia and oculomotor symptoms to locked-in syndrome. Intervention can lead to complete neurological recovery despite the severity of initial deficits. We report a case of basilar artery occlusion in a healthy 36-year-old female with minimal risk factors. The patient underwent interventional thrombectomy within eight hours of onset of symptoms and made a significant recovery. Due to the variation in severity and character of symptoms, the diagnosis of basilar artery occlusion is often a barrier to care.

BackgroundWe explored whether the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be characterized by incorporating a composite of duration of response (DOR) to complement traditional Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria for objective response rate (ORR) in an intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Furthermore, the correlation of this novel endpoint, characterized by the restricted mean time in response (RMTR), with overall survival (OS) will be examined.MethodsWe analyzed ORR alone or in combination with DOR (RMTR) in available phase I, II, and III trials evaluating nivolumab monotherapy or in combination with ipilimumab across solid tumor types. ORR was evaluated per RECIST V.1.1. DOR was estimated using individual patient data in ITT populations regardless of RECIST response, with non-responders imputed as zero. Associations between ORR alone or RMTR and OS were evaluated in the ITT population. DOR curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method, and 6-month RMTR, a measure of response durability, was derived from the area under the curves. For ORR and RMTR in the ITT population, the strength of association with OS was analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficients (r).ResultsNivolumab treatment was associated with longer response durations than active control in responder and ITT populations. Similarly, ORR and RMTR were both significantly correlated with OS (ORR vs OS: r=0.684, p=0.02; RMTR vs OS: r=0.695, p=0.018).ConclusionsCombining ORR and DOR (RMTR) to objectively characterize tumor shrinkage in an ITT patient population is a novel approach that appears to correlate well with OS in patients treated with nivolumab monotherapy or in combination with ipilimumab. This endpoint may provide a more complete characterization of tumor shrinkage to incorporate into the design of future ICI clinical trials. However, confirmation of this approach will require further research.

Objective: Growing literature has documented the clinical utility of neuropsychological evaluations for predicting functional outcomes, including reduced healthcare service utilization, in ...

Collections of plants at the botanical gardens are storages of genetic resources. However, their genetic diversity is often limited, because there are only single or very few individual species of a plant. This study has assessed genetic material of small number of samples of Magnolia delavayi at the botanical gardens in Ireland and to establish whether they represent a single homogenous genepool or belong to distinct lineages. The results showed that specimens at the gardens contain two distinct genotypes. The historical data on the origin is unclear, but the DNA evidence suggests that the two lineages come from two different sources. A chloroplast DNA can be used to distinguish clones of Magnolia delavayi in the collections of the botanical gardens.

Background Because there are limited head-to-head data comparing antiretroviral combinations, physicians are tempted to rely on cross-trial comparisons to evaluate the relative efficacy of HIV drugs. However, a variety of factors can confound these comparisons, resulting in misleading or invalid conclusions. Objectives To compare and evaluate the use of: (i) versions 1.0 and 1.5 of the Roche AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR ® UltraSensitive assay, and (ii) ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and plasma preparation (PPT) tubes on the proportion of HIV-infected patients who would be classified as virological responders in a multinational clinical trial. Study design The study utilized was a randomized, double-blind trial comparing the efficacy and safety of atazanavir with efavirenz, each in combination with fixed-dose zidovudine/lamivudine, in antiretroviral-naive patients. To evaluate the effect of monitor kit version, paired plasma samples from 634 patients at week 48 were analyzed using both versions 1.0 and 1.5 of the monitor kit. To evaluate the effect of collection tube type, paired plasma samples collected from 584 patients at week 52 using both EDTA and PPT tubes were assayed. Patients were classified as responders if HIV-1 RNA levels were below a pre-determined level of quantification (LOQ), both 400 and 50 copies/ml. Results and conclusions Substantially higher HIV-1 RNA levels were observed with monitor kit version 1.5, resulting in lower response rates. The version 1.0 monitor kit resulted in a 7% increase in patients classified as responders at the LOQ of 400 copies/ml and a 13% increase at the LOQ of 50 copies/ml. Consistently higher response rates (11% higher at the LOQ of 400 copies/ml and 34% higher at the LOQ of 50 copies/ml) were also observed when samples were collected in EDTA tubes compared with PPT tubes. Differences in monitor kit sensitivity and plasma collection procedures are key factors in study results and suggest caution when performing cross-study comparisons.

Background/Aims To examine if serum fibrosis biomarkers could accurately identify the stage of liver disease amongst hepatitis C (HCV) and HIV co-infected patients. Methods One hundred and thirty seven HIV/HCV co-infected persons were randomly selected from the Johns Hopkins HIV Clinic cohort. Ninety five had complete testing for fibrosis markers in sera collected at the time of liver biopsy. Biopsies were scored according to Ishak modified histological activity index (F0 no fibrosis to F6 cirrhosis). Fibrosis was evaluated against alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), AST to platelet ratio (APRI), albumin, total bilirubin, hyaluronic acid (HA) and YKL-40. Results Sixty nine (73%) had no or minimal portal fibrosis (F0-2) and were compared with remaining subjects (F3-6). Fibrosis scores ≥F3 were found 27 times more often in persons with HA levels >86ng/ml and 5.5 times more often in persons with HA levels 41–86ng/ml. Less substantial associations were detected with levels of albumin 60iu (OR 5.91). All 35 subjects who had favorable results of HA, albumin, and AST had minimal fibrosis (F0-2). Conclusions Amongst HIV/HCV co-infected patients, serum testing for HA, albumin, and AST (SHASTA Index) was able to accurately stage mild and advanced fibrosis.

Protease inhibitor (PI) treatment can result in dyslipidemia in a significant proportion of patients. Atazanavir (ATV) is a once-daily PI that has not been associated with clinically relevant increases in total cholesterol (TC), fasting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), or fasting triglyceride (TG) concentrations. The objectives of this paper were to evaluate lipid profiles in untreated patients, and investigate the frequency and severity of dyslipidemia in the same individuals after treatment with ATV or nelfinavir (NFV) for 48 weeks. Two multinational, randomized, active-controlled, blinded trials compared the safety and efficacy of ATV and NFV in combination with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in antiretroviral (ARV)-naive patients. Serum lipid concentrations were analyzed in patients who had available measurements both at baseline and at week 48. Patients who had missing data at either time point were not included. Lipid levels remained within baseline ranges at week 48 with ATV treatment, whereas clinically relevant elevations in TC, fasting LDL-C, and fasting TG concentrations occurred with NFV treatment. Mean changes from pre-treatment baseline in fasting LDL-C ranged from -6 percent to +6 percent in the ATV-treatment groups, and from +27 percent to +31 percent in the NFV-treatment groups. After 48 weeks, there was a substantive increase in the proportion of NFV-treated patients who would be recommended for lipid-lowering treatment by National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) guidelines, whereas a lesser proportion of ATV-treated patients would be recommended for lipid-lowering treatment. Atazanavir does not lead to dyslipidemia in ARV-naive patients, and may limit the need for lipid-lowering strategies to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease.

The purpose of the study was to determine long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of atazanavir plus stayudine/lamivudine in 346 HIV-infected patients previously treated with atazanavir or nelfinavir. BMS A1424-044 is an ongoing, multicenter, international, open-label, rollover/switch study initiated in June 2001. Patients completing ≥48 weeks in trial BMS A1424-008 with a plasma HIV RNA viral load

Background: Preterm birth, low birth weight, and infant catch-up growth seem associated with an increased risk of respiratory diseases in later life, but individual studies showed conflicting results. Objectives: We performed an individual participant data meta-analysis for 147,252 children of 31 birth cohort studies to determine the associations of birth and infant growth characteristics with the risks of preschool wheezing (1-4 years) and school-age asthma (5-10 years). Methods: First, we performed an adjusted 1-stage random-effect meta-analysis to assess the combined associations of gestational age, birth weight, and infant weight gain with childhood asthma. Second, we performed an adjusted 2-stage random-effect meta-analysis to assess the associations of preterm birth (gestational age < 37 weeks) and low birth weight (< 2500 g) with childhood asthma outcomes. Results: Younger gestational age at birth and higher infant weight gain were independently associated with higher risks of preschool wheezing and school-age asthma (P

Efficacy in HIV clinical trials is measured by changes in HIV RNA levels over time as well as the proportion of subjects with HIV RNA levels below an assay’s threshold of reliable quantification at a single time point. Missing data arise naturally due to missed visits and premature discontinuations of treatment. The available data are then analyzed using repeated measures models and univariate comparisons of proportions, assuming missing data occur at random or considering missing values as treatment failures (worst case scenario). These and other methods recently proposed by regulatory authorities are presented along with alternative approaches. Advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed. Data from a recent comparison of ’ standard-of-care’ triple combination regimens are used for illustration.

Objective: To compare the antiviral activity of once-daily didanosine (ddl) and twice-daily ddl in combination with stavudine (d4T). Design: Randomized, double-blind, multicenter study. Setting: Twenty-one sites in the United States. Patients: Eighty-seven antiretroviral-naive, HIV-1 -infected adults with baseline plasma HIV RNA counts of ≥ 10 000 copies/ml and CD4 cell counts of ≥ 100 cells/mm 3 started study therapy. Interventions: Patients received once-daily ddl or twice-daily ddl, each combined with twice-daily d4T. Main outcome measures: Plasma HIV-1 RNA levels, CD4 cell counts, and adverse events were regularly monitored. The primary efficacy analysis used was the time-averaged difference (TAD) between treatment regimens in change from baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA levels over the first 12 weeks of therapy. Results: At week 12, median log 10 HIV-1 RNA changes were -1.83 log 10 copies/ml in the once-daily ddl/d4T group and -1.80 log 10 copies/ml in the twice-daily ddl/d4T group, and 18 out of 44 patients (41%) and 17 out of 43 patients (40%), respectively, had HIV-1 RNA levels below 400 copies/ml. Similar results were seen at week 24. The TAD between the two treatment groups (once-daily ddl/d4T minus twice-daily ddl/d4T) in change from baseline plasma HIV RNA levels over the first 12 weeks was 0.14 log 10 copies/ml (95% Cl: -0.11, 0.40). At week 12, subjects averaged an increase in CD4 cell count of over 140 cells/mm 3 . The TAD between the two treatment groups in change from baseline CD4 cell counts over the first 12 weeks was 2 cells/mm 3 (95% Cl: -40, 45). Conclusion: Once-daily ddl plus d4T and twice-daily ddl plus d4T were similarly effective in reducing plasma HIV-1 RNA levels and increasing CD4 cell counts over 12-24 weeks of therapy.

Suppose we wish to estimate the common mean μof two normal samples with unknown variances .If are equal, we may average the two sample estimators of μindependently of the variances. This procedure is known to be admissible in the sense that no other estimator has uniformly smaller mean squared error. In the case when are not equal, many combination procedures have been proposed. The maximum likelihood procedure is also known to be admissible in a restricted class of estimators. A procedure proposed by Zacks combines these two admissible procedures based on the result of a preliminary test for the equality of . We propose Bayes estimators for μderived from carefully chosen prior distributions and give simulation results to show that the Zacks estimators involving a preliminary test are uniformly beaten by the Bayes procedures.

International audience; Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes often have decreased performance status secondary to extensive tumor involvement. Here, we report the pooled analysis of efficacy and safety data from two similarly designed phase III studies to provide a more precise estimate of benefit of ixabepilone plus capecitabine in MBC patients with Karnofsky's performance status (KPS) 70-80. Across the studies, anthracycline/taxane-pretreated MBC patients were randomized to receive ixabepilone plus capecitabine or capecitabine alone. Individual patient data for KPS 70-80 subset ( = 606) or KPS 90-100 subset ( = 1349) from the two studies were pooled by treatment. Analysis included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. In patients with reduced performance status (KPS 70-80), ixabepilone plus capecitabine was associated with improvements in OS (median: 12.3 vs. 9.5 months; HR, 0.75; = 0.0015), PFS (median: 4.6 vs. 3.1 months; HR, 0.76; = 0.0021) and ORR (35 vs. 19%) over capecitabine alone. Corresponding results in patients with high performance status (KPS 90-100) were median OS of 16.7 versus 16.2 months (HR, 0.98; = 0.8111), median PFS of 6.0 versus 4.4 months (HR, 0.58; = 0.0009), and ORR of 45 versus 28%. The safety profile of combination therapy was similar between the subgroups. Ixabepilone plus capecitabine appeared to show superior efficacy compared to capecitabine alone in MBC patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes, regardless of performance status, with a possible OS benefit favoring KPS 70-80 patients (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00080301 and NCT00082433).

Advances in the treatment of the respiratory complications of cystic fibrosis, including the availability of lung transplantation have led to a greater awareness of the manifestations of liver disease in up to 40% of patients with Cystic Fibrosis (CF). We report the case of an 18 year old female with CF who presented with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and no prior clinical evidence of chronic liver disease. Hepatocellular carcinoma is usually the most severe manifestation of advanced cirrhosis although its development in non-cirrhotic cases of chronic liver disease has been reported. With the increasing life expectancy of CF patients it is likely that more unusual hepatic complications of this disease may be identified. Greater awareness may perhaps lead to earlier diagnosis in those at risk.

OBJECTIVE To compare the efficiency and safety of atazanavir and nelfinavir in antiretroviral-naive patients. DESIGN Randomization to atazanavir 400 mg or 600 mg once daily; nelfinavir 1250 mg twice a day, plus lamivudine and stavudine. METHODS A blinded (to the atazanavir dose), 48-week trial in patients with HIV-1 RNA > or = 2000 copies/ml, CD4 cell count > or = 100 x 10(6) cells/l. Primary end-point: change in HIV-1 RNA from baseline at 48 weeks. Secondary end-point: subjects with HIV-1 RNA < 400, and < 50 copies/ml, CD4 cell count changes, adverse events. RESULTS The 467 randomized subjects had comparable baseline characteristics across treatments. With atazanavir 400 mg, 600 mg and nelfinavir, respectively, mean changes in HIV-1 RNA (log10 copies/ml) from baseline to 48 weeks were -2.51, -2.58, -2.31; HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/ml [intent-to-treat population (ITT), non-completion = failure (NC = F)], 64%, 67%, 53%; HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/ml (ITT NC = F), 35%, 36%, 34%; mean CD4 cell count increased comparably at 48 weeks (234 x 10(6), 243 x 10(6), 211 x 10(6) cells/l). Adverse events were similar across treatments with the exception of diarrhea (more frequent with nelfinavir) and jaundice (more frequent with atazanavir). Mean changes from baseline to 48 weeks were: fasting low density lipoprotein cholesterol, +5.2%, +7.1% and +23.2% (at 56 weeks) and fasting triglycerides (48 weeks), +7.2%, +7.6% and +49.5%, in the atazanavir 400 mg, 600 mg, and nelfinavir groups, respectively (P < 0.01, atazanavir versus nelfinavir). CONCLUSIONS Atazanavir is a potent, safe, well tolerated, and effective once-daily protease inhibitor with low pill burden (two capsules/day). Lipid changes with atazanavir were significantly less than with nelfinavir, however, clinical significance of these finding in terms of decreased cardiovascular risk is unknown.

We assessed the safety profile, tolerability, and antiviral effect of 12 weeks of triple combination therapy with stavudine (d4T), didanosine (ddI), and nelfinavir in patients who had not previously received therapy with d4T, ddI, or a protease inhibitor. We also assessed the effect of the buffered tablet formulation of ddI on the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir. The study had a single-arm, open-label design and enrolled patients agedor =18 years who had HIV infection andor =10,000 plasma HIV RNA copies/mL. Patients received the full recommended doses of oral d4T, ddI, and nelfinavir. Efficacy was assessed in terms of change from baseline in plasma HIV RNA and CD4+ cell counts, as well as in terms of the proportion of patients achieving HIV RNA levels400 copies/mL. The first 10 patients enrolled in the study were included in a substudy to determine the effects of the buffered tablet formulation of ddI on the pharmacokinetic profile of nelfinavir. A dose of ddI was given 1 hour before nelfinavir, after which the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (Tmax), and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of nelfinavir were determined. A total of 22 patients entered the trial, of whom 1 (5%) had AIDS, 12 (55%) had symptomatic HIV infection, and 9 (41%) were asymptomatic. The median baseline CD4+ cell count was 315 cells/microL (range, 70-709 cells/microL), and the median plasma viral load was 4.8 log10 copies/mL (range, 4.0-5.6 log10 copies/mL). ddI had no clinically significant effects on the plasma pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir. At the end of 12 weeks of treatment, the mean (+/- SE) decrease in plasma viral load was 1.36+/-0.24 log10 copies/mL, and 8 of 16 patients (50%) achieved plasma HIV RNA levels400 copies/mL; the mean (+/- SE) increase in CD4+ cell count was 111.4+/-31.7 cells/microL. Patients who were judged to be compliant with antiretroviral therapy (ie, who missed7 days of all 3 study drugs during 12 weeks of treatment) experienced mean decreases in viral load exceeding 2.0 log10 copies/mL, and 6 of 7 patients achieved HIV RNA levels400 copies/mL after 12 weeks of therapy. Although 95% of patients reported an adverse event of grade 1 or higher, only 1 patient experienced a grade 3 or 4 adverse event (maculopapular rash) related to nelfinavir. As reflected in the Cmax, Tmax, and AUC, administration of ddI 1 hour before nelfinavir did not influence the pharmacokinetic profile of the protease inhibitor. Triple drug therapy with d4T, ddI, and nelfinavir was well tolerated and associated with few clinically significant toxicities. This treatment resulted in substantial reductions in viral load and improvements in CD4+ cell count over 12 weeks.

Peripheral neuropathy has been recognized as a dose-limiting adverse effect in Phase I studies of didanosine (ddI) therapy for HIV infection. To study the effect of the currently recommended lower dose of ddI, the databases of 4 randomized, controlled trials were used to assess the frequency of dose-limiting peripheral neuropathy during treatment with ddI 500 or 750 mg/d, compared with zidovudine (ZDV) monotherapy or combination therapy with ddI/ZDV or zalcitabine/ZDV. No between-group differences in risk factors for neuropathy (eg, infectious and metabolic factors, malignancy, concurrent medications) were observed in the individual trials, and the presence of these risk factors appeared to have no increased treatment effect on the occurrence of neuropathy. No significant between-group differences were observed in the individual studies with regard to the incidence or time to onset of peripheral neuropathy. Analysis of the combined results by treatment regimen showed no significant difference in the incidence of neuropathy between recipients of ddI 500 mg/d, ddI 750 mg/d, or ZDV and no significant difference in the cumulative dose received until the onset of neuropathy between the ddI 500- and 750-mg regimens. Entry CD4+ cell counts were significantly predictive of neuropathy, with each 100-cell/microL decrement associated with a 17% increase in risk (P = 0.002); a CD4+ cell count of50 cells/microL was highly predictive of neuropathy (P = 0.0001). In summary, the risk for peripheral neuropathy was not increased by treatment with ddI versus comparator regimens or by treatment with ddI at the dosages used in studies conducted more recently than the Phase I trials. Peripheral neuropathy seems more likely to be associated with advanced HIV infection and lower CD4+ cell counts (particularly counts50 cells/microL) than with ddI therapy at the currently recommended dose.