Search

The purpose of the research was to improve prediction of response of buildings to blast waves by including the negative phase and considering clearing of both positive and negative phases. Commonly used structural design practices, which trace their origins to military design manuals, often ignore the negative phase as well as positive phase clearing. For high explosive threats, this approach is conservative in most circumstances. However, negative phase clearing had not previously been studied for blast waves, and the implications for structural response had not been evaluated. This paper presents results of modeling negative phase blast clearing behavior for a typical blast wave and discusses the differences from positive phase clearing. The implications of including positive and negative phase clearing in building blast damage analysis are also investigated through single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) analyses. Blast waves from explosion sources like a vapor cloud explosion (VCE), pressure vessel burst or high explosive exhibit both positive and negative phases, and the relative magnitude of the positive and negative phases varies among explosion sources and the specific circumstances of each source. A fully reflected blast wave is produced if an incident blast wave were to strike an infinitely tall and wide wall in a normal orientation. Both the positive and negative phases of the blast wave are enhanced by the reflection process. However, when an incident blast wave strikes a wall of finite size in a normal orientation, rarefaction waves are created at the edges of the wall, and the rarefactions sweep down from the roof and inward from sides. The rarefaction waves result in a clearing effect for both the positive and negative phases. Clearing relieves some of the applied blast load on the reflected wall for the positive phase. However, this is not always the case for the negative phase. As shown by the results presented in this paper, clearing may either relieve or enhance the applied negative phase blast load, depending on the duration of the blast wave and the wall dimensions. The impact of negative phase clearing on structural response for generic building components was also investigated. Nonlinear SDOF methods were used to characterize response in terms of peak positive and negative displacements. It was found that the influence of the negative phase is significant and the peak structural response can occur during negative (outward) displacement.

Based on Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) requirements, project specific blast loads are determined for the design of a new airport traffic control tower. These blast loads must be resisted by exterior wall panels on the control tower, protecting building occupants from intentional explosives attack scenarios. Such blast resistant walls are typically constructed of thick reinforced concrete panels or composite steel plate and rolled sections, as conventional building cladding systems have relatively low blast resistance. While these more robust design approaches are valid, the additional cladding mass they represent will significantly increase the base shear and overturning demand in seismic zones. This paper investigates the use of a light structural system comprised of a steel stud wall assembly partially embedded in a thin layer of concrete to obtain composite action. Fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composites are also included to increase the blast resistance and aid in keeping the panel weight to a minimum. Two full-scale composite steel stud walls are designed, constructed, and tested dynamically in the BakerRisk shock tube. The stud walls consist of back-to-back 150 mm deep, 14 gauge (1.8 mm thick), cold-formed steel studs spaced at 610 mm on center. Both specimens have a 50 mm thick normal weight concrete layer, reinforced with welded wire mesh that is welded to the stud compression flanges to achieve composite action. Two layers of Tyfo® SEH-51A fiber reinforced composites are used on the tension flange of the steel studs. A single layer of Tyfo® SEH-51A composites is used on the tension face of the concrete layer between the studs for one of the specimens. Web stiffeners are used at the bearing support to prevent premature web crippling shear failure of the specimens. The stud walls are analyzed using single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) models. A non-linear moment-curvature relationship, accounting for actual material constitutive properties, is used for determining the resistance function of the walls. Blast pressure and impulse data from the shock tube tests is used to compare analytical predictions to the measured displacement-time response. Analytical predictions of panel response for both tests are within ten percent of the observed response based on displacement.

Full-depth precast deck slab cantilevers also referred to as full-depth precast concrete bridge deck overhang panels are becoming increasingly popular in concrete bridge deck construction. To date, no simple theory is able to estimate the overhang capacity of full-depth concrete bridge deck slabs accurately. Observations suggest that interaction between flexure and shear is likely to occur as neither alone provides an accurate estimate of the load-carrying capacity. Therefore, modified yield line theory is presented in this paper, which accounts for the development length of the mild steel reinforcing to reach yield strength. Failure of the full-depth panels is influenced by the presence of the partial-depth transverse panel-to-panel seam. When applying a load on the edge of the seam, the loaded panel fails under flexure while the seam fails in shear. Through the use of the modified yield line theory coupled with a panel-to-panel shear interaction, analytical predictions are accurate within 1–6% of experimental results for critical cases.

Modern concrete bridge decks commonly consist of stay-in-place (SIP) precast panels seated on precast concrete beams and topped with cast-in-place (CIP) reinforced concrete. Such composite bridge decks have been experimentally tested by various researchers to assess structural performance. However, a failure theory that describes the failure mechanism and accurately predicts the corresponding load has not been previously derived. When monotonically increasing patch loads are applied, delamination occurs between the CIP concrete and SIP panels, with a compound shear-flexure mechanism resulting. An additive model of flexural yield line failure in the lower SIP precast prestressed panels and punching shear in the upper CIP-reinforced concrete portion of the deck system is derived. Analyses are compared to full-scale experimental results of a tandem wheel load straddling adjacent SIP panels and a trailing wheel load on a single panel. Alone, both yield line and punching-shear theories gave poor predictions of the observed failure load; however, the proposed compound shear-flexure failure mechanism load capacities are within 2% accuracy of the experimentally observed loads. Better estimation using the proposed theory of composite SIP-CIP deck system capacities will aid in improving the design efficiency of these systems.

The performance of a new full-depth precast overhang panel system for concrete bridge decks is investigated experimentally. In contrast to conventional cast-in-place deck overhangs, the proposed full-depth precast overhang system has the potential to speed up construction, reduce costs, and improve safety. Load-deformation behavior up to factored design load limits is first investigated. The panel is then loaded near its edge to examine the collapse capacity and the associated failure modes—particularly the influence of panel-to-panel connections that exist, transverse to the bridge deck axis. Comparative tests are also conducted with a conventional cast-in-place overhang system. When compared to the conventional cast-in-place overhang behavior, the experimental results show that the precast full-depth overhang introduces different behavior modes, largely due to the influence of the partial depth panel-to-panel connection, which reduces the capacity by some 13%.

The use of full-depth precast overhang panels provides an alternative to modern bridge deck construction by eliminating the need to form a full-depth cast-in-place (CIP) overhang. Additional benefits from these precast panels include improving worker safety conditions during construction and accelerating construction. To validate the capacity of a full-depth precast bridge deck system compared with a conventionally constructed concrete bridge deck, the Texas Department of Transportation sponsored an experimental investigation. For both, the failure loads exceeded the maximum factored 2007 AASHTO load and resistance factor design for decks and deck overhangs. Observations suggest that there is an interaction between flexure and shear to estimate the capacity of full-depth concrete bridge deck overhangs or slabs constructed with stay-in-place (SIP) panels and a CIP topping. This paper shows how a modified yield line theory, which accounts for the development length of the mild steel reinforcing to reach yield strength, is used to analyze precast bridge decks with full-depth precast overhang panels. For the full-depth overhangs, the internal work equation is further modified to allow for the panel-to-panel seam that exists within the system. At the interior portions of the bridge deck, a compound shear–flexure mechanism is proposed. This is an additive model of a flexural yield line failure in the lower SIP precast panels and punching shear in the upper CIP portion of the deck. Therefore, a strength method of analysis is used to design the exterior portion (overhang) that incorporates the concurrent effects of flexure and shear in panelized precast deck systems.

Existing welded steel moment frames are designed to tolerate substantial yielding and plastic rotation under earthquake loads. This sacrificial design approach can lead to permanent, and often irreparable damage when interstory drifts exceed 2%. The experimental seismic performance of a 50% full-scale damage avoidance designed structural steel beam-column connection is presented. The beam-column joint region consists of a top flange-hung beam connected to the column by an angle bracket. High-force-to-volume (HF2V) devices are attached from the column to the beam to provide joint rigidity and energy dissipation as the joint opens and closes. The HF2V devices are connected either below the beam flange or concealed above the beam's lower flange. Reversed cyclic lateral load tests are conducted with drift amplitudes up to 4%. No damage is observed in the principal beam and column structural elements. The need for stiff device connections to achieve optimal device performance is demonstrated, and potential design solutions presented. Stable hysteresis and repeatable energy dissipation for a large number of cycles up to the 4% drift level is observed. It is concluded that superior and repeatable energy dissipation without damage can be achieved for every dynamic motion cycle, in contrast to conventional sacrificially designed welded moment frame connections.

Current practice in blast-resistant structural design involves a component by component dynamic analysis to calculate the expected displacement for each structural component. The blast induced displacement is then compared to limit values that are defined based on the component type and the expected damage level. Current provisions, such as ASCE 59-11 Blast Protection of Buildings and The Department of Defense Unified Facilities Criteria, identify limit values for increasing damage level in terms of end support rotations of steel frame components as high as 20 degrees. This paper considers the performance of simple shear tab connections at large beam end support rotations. In particular it focuses on the residual shear strength of the connection at large rotation values. Limit values suggested by current blast-resistant design provisions will be discussed and compared to seismic design limit values and experimental evidence on simple shear tab connections. Simple analytical models will be developed to evaluate the impact of incorporating the connection effects on the dynamic response of simply supported beam elements.