Among citizens of the same political community there is often a marked degree of economic and social inequality. The main rea? son for this is the fact that they are living and working in different areas, some of which are more economically developed than others. Where this situation obtains, justice and equity demand that pub? lic authority try to eliminate or reduce such inequality. It should ensure that underdeveloped areas receive such essential public services as their circumstances require, in order to bring the standard of living in these areas into line with the national average. Furthermore, a suitable economic and social policy must be de? vised, aimed at controlling the supply of labour, the drift of popula? tion, wages, taxes, credit, and the investing of money, especially in expanding industries. In short, it should be a policy designed to promote useful employment, enterprising initiative, and the ex? ploitation of local resources. But the justification of all government action is the common good. Public authority, therefore, must bear in mind the interests of the state as a whole; which means that it must promote all three areas of production?agriculture, industry and public services? simultaneously and evenly. Everything must be done to ensure that citizens of the less developed areas are treated as responsible human beings, and are allowed to play the major role in achieving their own economic, social and cultural advancement. Private enterprise too must contribute to an economic and social balance in the different zones of the same political com? munity. Indeed, in accordance with "the principle of subsidiary function," public authority must encourage and assist private enter? prise, entrusting to it, wherever possible, the continuation of eco? nomic development.1