Search

Technical development during the last two decades has brought new potential and new applications for ­mobile measurements. In this paper, we present six case studies where mobile measurement devices were used to acquire data for meteorological and climatological research. Three case studies deal with ground-based mobile measurements – on buses for urban climate measurements and on a vessel on a lake – and three with airborne platforms – on a cable car and on an unmanned aerial vehicle for vertical soundings and on a tethered balloon sonde for cloud physics. For each study, we describe the measurement set-up and address the potential and drawbacks of these applications. At the end, we discuss general aspects related to mobile observations especially concerning the time and space dimension of measurements.

The Global Precipitation Measurement Mission (GPM) improved spaceborne precipitation data. The GPM dual-frequency precipitation radar (DPR) provides information on total precipitation (TP), snowfall precipitation (SF) and snowfall flags (surface snowfall flag (SSF) and phase near surface (PNS)), among other variables. Especially snowfall data were hardly validated. This study compares GPM DPR TP, SF and snowfall flags on the Tibetan Plateau (TiP) against TP and SF from six well-known model-based data sets used as ground truth: ERA 5, ERA 5 land, ERA Interim, MERRA 2, JRA 55 and HAR V2. The reanalysis data were checked for consistency. The results show overall high agreement in the cross-correlation with each other. The reanalysis data were compared to the GPM DPR snowfall flags, TP and SF. The intercomparison performs poorly for the GPM DPR snowfall flags (HSS = 0.06 for TP, HSS = 0.23 for SF), TP (HSS = 0.13) and SF (HSS = 0.31). Some studies proved temporal or spatial mismatches between spaceborne measurements and other data. We tested whether increasing the time lag of the reanalysis data (+/−three hours) or including the GPM DPR neighbor pixels (3 × 3 pixel window) improves the results. The intercomparison with the GPM DPR snowfall flags using the temporal adjustment improved the results significantly (HSS = 0.21 for TP, HSS = 0.41 for SF), whereas the spatial adjustment resulted only in small improvements (HSS = 0.12 for TP, HSS = 0.29 for SF). The intercomparison of the GPM DPR TP and SF was improved by temporal (HSS = 0.3 for TP, HSS = 0.48 for SF) and spatial adjustment (HSS = 0.35 for TP, HSS = 0.59 for SF). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Radiation fog nowcasting remains a complex yet critical task due to its substantial impact on traffic safety and economic activity. Current numerical weather prediction models are hindered by computational intensity and knowledge gaps regarding fog‐influencing processes. Machine‐Learning (ML) models, particularly those employing the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) algorithm, may offer a robust alternative, given their ability to learn directly from data, swiftly generate nowcasts, and manage non‐linear interrelationships among fog variables. However, unlike recurrent neural networks XGB does not inherently process temporal data, which is crucial in fog formation and dissipation. This study proposes incorporating preprocessed temporal data into the model training and applying a weighted moving‐average filter to regulate the substantial fluctuations typical in fog development. Using an ML training and evaluation scheme for time series data, we conducted an extensive bootstrapped comparison of the influence of different smoothing intensities and trend information timespans on the model performance on three levels: overall performance, fog formation and fog dissipation. The performance is checked against one benchmark and two baseline models. A significant performance improvement was noted for the station in Linden‐Leihgestern (Germany), where the initial F1 score of 0.75 (prior to smoothing and trend information incorporation) was improved to 0.82 after applying the smoothing technique and further increased to 0.88 when trend information was incorporated. The forecasting periods ranged from 60 to 240 min into the future. This study offers novel insights into the interplay of data smoothing, temporal preprocessing, and ML in advancing radiation fog nowcasting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Operational weather satellites, dating back to 1970s, currently provide the best basis for climatological investigations, such as an analysis of changes in the cloud cover. Because clouds are highly dynamic in time, temporally high-resolution data from the geostationary orbit are preferred in order to take variations in the diurnal cycles into account. For such studies, a consistent dataset in space and time is mandatory, but not yet available. Ground-based point measurements of various cloud parameters, such as ceiling, visibility, and cloud type are often sparsely spread and inconsistent, making it difficult to derive reliable spatio-temporal information over large areas. The Meteosat program has generally provided suitable data from over Europe since 1977, but different spatial, spectral, and radiometric resolution of the instruments of the individual satellites, including early-years calibration uncertainties, makes harmonization necessary to finally derive a time series applicable to any kind of climatological study. In this study, a machine learning-based approach has been employed to generate a long-term consistent dataset with high spatio-temporal resolution and extensive coverage over Europe by the harmonization of Meteosat First Generation (MFG) and Meteosat Second Generation (MSG) satellite datasets (1991–2020). A random forest (RF) regressor is trained on the overlap period (2004–2006), where datasets of both satellite generation (MFG and MSG) are available to predict MFG Water Vapour (WV) and Infrared (IR) channels brightness temperature (BT) values based on MSG channels. The aim of the study is to synthesize MFG MVIRI data from MSG SEVIRI to generate a consistent MFG time series. The results indicate a good match of MFG synthesized data with the original MFG data with a mean absolute error of 0.7 K for the WV model and 1.6 K for the IR model, and an out-of-bag (OOB) R² score of 0.98 for both the models. Based on the trained models, the MFG scenes are synthesized from the MSG scenes for the years from 2006 to 2020. The long-term homogeneity of the generated time series is analyzed. The harmonized dataset will be applied to generate a continuous time series on fog and low stratus (FLS) occurrence for a climatological time scale of 30 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]