Search

Objective: To review tumors identified as "clear cell sarcoma" in order to determine similarities to the rare EWS fusion positive jaw and salivary gland tumors clear cell odontogenic carcinoma (CCOC) and clear cell carcinoma of the salivary gland (CCC)., Methods: PubMed was used to collect all reports of clear cell sarcoma (CCS). Search parameters were "clear cell sarcoma" and "CCS." References in the publications were screened and cross-referenced. Data extracted included demographic characteristics, presenting signs and symptoms, radiographic findings, histological and immunohistochemical features and known molecular/genetic aberrations., Results: Clear cell sarcoma has several similarities to CCOC and CCC. All three tumor types have similar histologic appearances including the presence of clear cells, as well as similar genetic profiles in that all harbor an EWSR1-CREB family fusions. Additionally, these tumors appear in soft tissue as well as bone, and can have a prolonged clinical course. CCS can appear anywhere in the body, including the head and neck region. All three tumors appear to have a predilection to women, although CCS may have a slight younger age of onset as compared to CCOC and CCC (3rd vs 5th decade of life, respectively)., Conclusion: Gaining a better understanding of the similarities and differences between these three tumors may lead to a better understanding of each one., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Companion diagnostics are an essential component of oncology. Timing, cost, and adaptability to new drug/biomarker approvals represent challenges in assuring value-based care. Overcoming these challenges requires strategies for equitable access and efficient integration., Methods: Based on prior laboratory improvements and payor policy implementations, we define equitable access in laboratory testing and conceptualized a framework for initiatives that optimize diagnostic performance., Results: We define equitable access as an imperative goal seeking to remove disparities that may arise due to financial hardships, geographical isolation, cultural differences, or other social determinants of health. We distinguish (a) utilization, as the practice pattern of ordered tests, (b) utilization management, as the evidence-based guidance of the utilization decisions, and (c) utilization management strategies, defined as the tools and techniques used to influence decision-making. These 3 dimensions establish a standardized vocabulary to clarify equitable alignment of strategies in specific care pathways. Alignment of logistic, administrative, and financial incentive structures is paramount when creating sustainable personalized care pathway programs., Conclusions: Strategies to accomplish equitable and meaningful use of diagnostic tests can help enhance access to timely and accurate diagnoses, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes., (© Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine 2024. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Mucosal melanoma (MM) is a rare subtype of melanoma with an aggressive clinical course. In cutaneous melanoma (CM), the absence of pigmentation and presence of NRAS/KRAS mutations are biomarkers indicating an aggressive clinical course with shorter overall survival. Similar data for MM are missing. We present the real-world outcome data in a cohort of genotyped MM patients and assessed the prognostic relevance of pigmentation- and NRAS/KRAS mutation status. We correlated pathological reports and clinical data with overall survival of patients with MM. Furthermore, we performed clinically integrated molecular genotyping and analyzed real world treatment regimens for covariates associated with clinical outcome. We identified 39 patients with available clinical and molecular data. Patients with amelanotic MM had a significantly shorter overall survival (p = .003). In addition, the presence of a NRAS or KRAS mutation was significantly associated with poor overall survival (NRAS or KRAS p = .024). Currently, it is unknown if the same prognostic relevance for the lack of pigmentation and RAS mutations in CM, exists in MM. Here we analyzed a cohort of MM for outcome measures and determined that two known prognostic biomarkers for CM are in fact novel prognosticators for MM., (© 2023 The Authors. Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Tissue microarrays (TMA) have become an important tool in high-throughput molecular profiling of tissue samples in the translational research setting. Unfortunately, high-throughput profiling in small biopsy specimens or rare tumor samples (eg, orphan diseases or unusual tumors) is often precluded owing to limited amounts of tissue. To overcome these challenges, we devised a method that allows tissue transfer and construction of TMAs from individual 2- to 5-μm sections for subsequent molecular profiling. We named the technique slide-to-slide (STS) transfer, and it requires a series of chemical exposures (so-called xylene-methacrylate exchange) in combination with rehydrated lifting, microdissection of donor tissues into multiple small tissue fragments (methacrylate-tissue tiles), and subsequent remounting on separate recipient slides (STS array slide). We developed the STS technique by assessing the efficacy and analytical performance using the following key metrics: (a) dropout rate, (b) transfer efficacy, (c) success rates using different antigen-retrieval methods, (d) success rates of immunohistochemical stains, (e) fluorescent in situ hybridization success rates, and (f) DNA and (g) RNA extraction yields from single slides, which all functioned appropriately. The dropout rate ranged from 0.7% to 6.2%; however, we applied the same STS technique successfully to fill these dropouts ("rescue" transfer). Hematoxylin and eosin assessment of donor slides confirmed a transfer efficacy of >93%, depending on the size of the tissue (range, 76%-100%). Fluorescent in situ hybridization success rates and nucleic acid yields were comparable with those of traditional workflows. In this study, we present a quick, reliable, and cost-effective method that offers the key advantages of TMAs and other molecular techniques-even when tissue is sparse. The perspectives of this technology in biomedical sciences and clinical practice are promising, given that it allows laboratories to create more data with less tissue., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Laboratory medicine has reached the era where promises of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) seem palpable. Currently, the primary responsibility for risk-benefit assessment in clinical practice resides with the medical director. Unfortunately, there is no tool or concept that enables diagnostic quality assessment for the various potential AI/ML applications. Specifically, we noted that an operational definition of laboratory diagnostic quality - for the specific purpose of assessing AI/ML improvements - is currently missing., Methods: A session at the 3rd Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Laboratory Medicine in 2022 on " AI in the Laboratory of the Future" prompted an expert roundtable discussion. Here we present a conceptual diagnostic quality framework for the specific purpose of assessing AI/ML implementations., Results: The presented framework is termed diagnostic quality model (DQM) and distinguishes AI/ML improvements at the test, procedure, laboratory, or healthcare ecosystem level. The operational definition illustrates the nested relationship among these levels. The model can help to define relevant objectives for implementation and how levels come together to form coherent diagnostics. The affected levels are referred to as scope and we provide a rubric to quantify AI/ML improvements while complying with existing, mandated regulatory standards. We present 4 relevant clinical scenarios including multi-modal diagnostics and compare the model to existing quality management systems., Conclusions: A diagnostic quality model is essential to navigate the complexities of clinical AI/ML implementations. The presented diagnostic quality framework can help to specify and communicate the key implications of AI/ML solutions in laboratory diagnostics., (© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.)

Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 are central to recovery and immunity from COVID-19. However, the relationship between disease severity and the repertoire of antibodies against specific SARS-CoV-2 epitopes an individual develops following exposure remains incompletely understood. Here, we studied seroprevalence of antibodies to specific SARS-CoV-2 and other betacoronavirus antigens in a well-annotated, community sample of convalescent and never-infected individuals obtained in August 2020. One hundred and twenty-four participants were classified into five groups: previously exposed but without evidence of infection, having no known exposure or evidence of infection, seroconverted without symptoms, previously diagnosed with symptomatic COVID-19, and recovered after hospitalization with COVID-19. Prevalence of IgGs specific to the following antigens was compared between the five groups: recombinant SARS-CoV-2 and betacoronavirus spike and nucleocapsid protein domains, peptides from a tiled array of 22-mers corresponding to the entire spike and nucleocapsid proteins, and peptides corresponding to predicted immunogenic regions from other proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Antibody abundance generally correlated positively with severity of prior illness. A number of specific immunogenic peptides and some that may be associated with milder illness or protection from symptomatic infection were identified. No convincing association was observed between antibodies to Receptor Binding Domain(s) (RBDs) of less pathogenic betacoronaviruses HKU1 or OC43 and COVID-19 severity. However, apparent cross-reaction with SARS-CoV RBD was evident and some predominantly asymptomatic individuals had antibodies to both MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV RBDs. Findings from this pilot study may inform development of diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutic antibodies, and provide insight into viral pathogenic mechanisms.

Background: New ultrasensitive methods for detecting residual disease after surgery are needed in human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV+OPSCC)., Methods: To determine whether the clearance kinetics of circulating tumor human papillomavirus DNA (ctHPVDNA) is associated with postoperative disease status, a prospective observational study was conducted in 33 patients with HPV+OPSCC undergoing surgery. Blood was collected before surgery, postoperative days 1 (POD 1), 7, and 30 and with follow-up. A subcohort of 12 patients underwent frequent blood collections in the first 24 hours after surgery to define early clearance kinetics. Plasma was run on custom droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) assays for HPV genotypes 16, 18, 33, 35, and 45., Results: In patients without pathologic risk factors for recurrence who were observed after surgery, ctHPVDNA rapidly decreased to <1 copy/mL by POD 1 (n = 8/8). In patients with risk factors for macroscopic residual disease, ctHPVDNA was markedly elevated on POD 1 (>350 copies/mL) and remained elevated until adjuvant treatment (n = 3/3). Patients with intermediate POD 1 ctHPVDNA levels (1.2-58.4 copies/mL) all possessed pathologic risk factors for microscopic residual disease (n = 9/9). POD 1 ctHPVDNA levels were higher in patients with known adverse pathologic risk factors such as extranodal extension >1 mm (P = .0481) and with increasing lymph nodes involved (P = .0453) and were further associated with adjuvant treatment received (P = .0076). One of 33 patients had a recurrence that was detected by ctHPVDNA 2 months earlier than clinical detection., Conclusions: POD 1 ctHPVDNA levels are associated with the risk of residual disease in patients with HPV+OPSCC undergoing curative intent surgery and thus could be used as a personalized biomarker for selecting adjuvant treatment in the future., Lay Summary: Human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV+OPSCC) is increasing at epidemic proportions and is commonly treated with surgery. This report describes results from a study examining the clearance kinetics of circulating tumor HPV DNA (circulating tumor human papillomavirus DNA [ctHPVDNA]) following surgical treatment of HPV+OPSCC. We found that ctHPVDNA levels 1 day after surgery are associated with the risk of residual disease in patients with HPV+OPSCC and thus could be used as a personalized biomarker for selecting adjuvant treatment in the future. These findings are the first to demonstrate the potential utility of ctHPVDNA in patients with HPV+OPSCC undergoing surgery., (© 2022 American Cancer Society.)

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is often seen in salivary glands and can harbor MAML2 translocations (MAML2+). The translocation status has diagnostic utility as an objective confirmation of the MEC diagnosis, for example, when distinction from the more aggressive adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) is not straightforward. To assess the diagnostic relevance of MAML2, we examined our 5-year experience in prospective testing of 8106 solid tumors using RNA-seq panel testing in combinations with a two-round Delphi-based scenario survey. The prevalence of MAML2+ across all tumors was 0.28% ( n = 23/8106) and the majority of MAML2+ cases were found in head and neck tumors (78.3%), where the overall prevalence was 5.9% ( n = 18/307). The sensitivity of MAML2 for MEC was 60% and most cases (80%) were submitted for diagnostic confirmation; in 24% of cases, the MAML2 results changed the working diagnosis. An independent survey of 15 experts showed relative importance indexes of 0.8 and 0.65 for "confirmatory MAML2 testing" in suspected MEC and ASC, respectively. Real-world evidence confirmed that the added value of MAML2 is a composite of an imperfect confirmation test for MEC and a highly specific exclusion tool for the diagnosis of ASC. Real-world evidence can help move a rare molecular-genetic biomarker from an emerging tool to the clinic.

Background: Understanding immunogenicity and effectiveness of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines is critical to guide rational use., Methods: We compared the immunogenicity of mRNA-1273, BNT-162b2, and Ad26.COV2.S in healthy ambulatory adults. We performed an inverse-variance meta-analysis of population-level effectiveness from public health reports in > 40 million individuals., Results: A single dose of either mRNA vaccine yielded comparable antibody and neutralization titers to convalescent individuals. Ad26.COV2.S yielded lower antibody concentrations and frequently undetectable neutralization titers. Bulk and cytotoxic T-cell responses were higher in mRNA1273 and BNT162b2 than Ad26.COV2.S recipients. Regardless of vaccine, <50% of vaccinees demonstrated CD8+ T-cell responses. Antibody concentrations and neutralization titers increased comparably after the first dose of either vaccine, and further in recipients of a second dose. Prior infection was associated with high antibody concentrations and neutralization even after a single dose and regardless of vaccine. Neutralization of Beta, Gamma, and Delta strains were poorer regardless of vaccine. In meta-analysis, relative to mRNA1273 the effectiveness of BNT162b2 was lower against infection and hospitalization, and Ad26COV2.S was lower against infection, hospitalization, and death., Conclusions: Variation in the immunogenicity correlates with variable effectiveness of the 3 vaccines deployed in the United States., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Purpose: The immunogenicity and reactogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with cancer are poorly understood., Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study of adults with solid-organ or hematologic cancers to evaluate anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin A/M/G spike antibodies, neutralization, and reactogenicity ≥ 7 days following two doses of mRNA-1273, BNT162b2, or one dose of Ad26.COV2.S. We analyzed responses by multivariate regression and included data from 1,638 healthy controls, previously reported, for comparison., Results: Between April and July 2021, we enrolled 1,001 patients; 762 were eligible for analysis (656 had neutralization measured). mRNA-1273 was the most immunogenic (log 10 geometric mean concentration [GMC] 2.9, log 10 geometric mean neutralization titer [GMT] 2.3), followed by BNT162b2 (GMC 2.4; GMT 1.9) and Ad26.COV2.S (GMC 1.5; GMT 1.4; P < .001). The proportion of low neutralization (< 20% of convalescent titers) among Ad26.COV2.S recipients was 69.9%. Prior COVID-19 infection (in 7.1% of the cohort) was associated with higher responses ( P < .001). Antibody titers and neutralization were quantitatively lower in patients with cancer than in comparable healthy controls, regardless of vaccine type ( P < .001). Receipt of chemotherapy in the prior year or current steroids were associated with lower antibody levels and immune checkpoint blockade with higher neutralization. Systemic reactogenicity varied by vaccine and correlated with immune responses ( P = .002 for concentration, P = .016 for neutralization). In 32 patients who received an additional vaccine dose, side effects were similar to prior doses, and 30 of 32 demonstrated increased antibody titers (GMC 1.05 before additional dose, 3.17 after dose)., Conclusion: Immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are modestly impaired in patients with cancer. These data suggest utility of antibody testing to identify patients for whom additional vaccine doses may be effective and appropriate, although larger prospective studies are needed., Competing Interests: Laura M. SpringConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, AvrobioResearch Funding: Tesaro (Inst), Merck (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Merck, Tesaro Steven J. IsakoffConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie, OncoPep, Puma Biotechnology, Seattle Genetics, Novartis, Paxman Coolers LtdResearch Funding: Genentech (Inst), PharmaMar (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), OncoPep (Inst), Merck (Inst), AstraZeneca/MedImmune (Inst), Outcomes4Me (Inst) Jocelyn R. FarmerConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb FoundationResearch Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb Foundation Leyre ZubiriConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck Gabriela S. HobbsConsulting or Advisory Role: Incyte, AbbVie, Novatis, Blueprint Medicines, Keros TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Incyte, Constellation Pharmaceuticals Andrew M. BrunnerConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Novartis, Takeda, Agios, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Acceleron PharmaResearch Funding: Celgene, Takeda, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca Amir T. FathiConsulting or Advisory Role: Agios, Novartis, Takeda, Astellas Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Bristol Myers Squibb, Forty Seven, AbbVie, Kite, a Gilead Company, Trovagene, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Amgen, Trillium Therapeutics, Blueprint Medicines, Kura Oncology, Foghorn Therapeutics, Genentech, Ipsen, MorphoSys, ServierResearch Funding: Takeda (Inst), Agios (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Servier (Inst) Brittany Y. BertauxEmployment: Partners (I) Elizabeth NiehoffStock and Other Ownership Interests: Biogen Inc, Blueprint Medicines, Crispr Therapeutics, InVitae, LabCorp, Natera Inc, Pacific Biosciences Christian N. NambuEmployment: Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, AFC Urgent Care (I)Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Moderna Therapeutics Onosereme OfomanEmployment: Massachusetts General Hospital Kerry ReynoldsEmployment: TeladocStock and Other Ownership Interests: Biogen (I)Other Relationship: Project DataSphere Henning WillersResearch Funding: Apple Inc Wilfredo-Garcia BeltranPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: European Patent—New therapy for treating graft-versus-host disease (EP3575320A1) Kimberly BlumenthalLeadership: Novocardia (I)Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Devoted Health (I), Novocardia (I)Honoraria: UpToDate, GA²LEN ANACAREResearch Funding: National Institute of Health (NIH)—K01AI125631, Massachusetts General Hospital, Transformative Scholar Award Ryan J. SullivanConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Merck, Replimune, Asana Biosciences, Alkermes, Eisai, Pfizer, Iovance Biotherapeutics, OncoSec, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers SquibbResearch Funding: Amgen (Inst), Lilly (Inst), BioMed Valley Discoveries (Inst), Merck (Inst), Deciphera (Inst), Roche/Genentech (Inst), Moderna Therapeutics (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), Aeglea Biotherapeutics (Inst), Asana Biosciences (Inst), Viralytics (Inst), Compugen (Inst), Neon Therapeutics (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), BeiGene (Inst), Rubius Therapeutics (Inst), Strategia (Inst) Yi-Bin ChenConsulting or Advisory Role: Magenta Therapeutics, Incyte, Kiadis Pharma, AbbVie, Equillium, Daiichi Sankyo/Lilly, Celularity, Actinium Pharmaceuticals Arthur KimConsulting or Advisory Role: Kintor PharmaceuticalPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Uptodate, Chapter Royalties Aditya BardiaConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis (Inst), Genentech, Pfizer (Inst), Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, bioTheranostics, Merck, Radius Health (Inst), Immunomedics (Inst), Genentech/Roche (Inst), Innocrin Pharma (Inst), Sanofi, Puma Biotechnology, Daiichi Sankyo/Astra Zeneca, Foundation Medicine, PhilipsResearch Funding: Genentech (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Merck (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), Radius Health (Inst), Immunomedics (Inst), AstraZeneca/Daiichi Sankyo (Inst)Open Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/523675 A. John IafrateStock and Other Ownership Interests: Archer BiosciencesConsulting or Advisory Role: Repare Therapeutics, Kinnate Biopharma, Oncoclinicas Brasil, PAIGE.AIPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: ArcherDx exclusive license to AMP technology Justin F. GainorThis author is a member of the JCO Editorial Board. Journal policy recused the author from having any role in the peer review of this manuscript.Employment: Ironwood Pharmaceuticals (I)Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Ironwood Pharmaceuticals (I)Honoraria: Merck, Incyte, ARIAD, Novartis, Pfizer, TakedaConsulting or Advisory Role: Genentech, Bristol Myers Squibb, Theravance, Loxo, Takeda, Array BioPharma, Amgen, Merck, Agios, Regeneron, Oncorus, Jounce Therapeutics, Blueprint Medicines, Gilead Sciences, Lilly, Moderna TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Genentech, ARIAD, Merck, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Adaptimmune, AstraZeneca, Jounce Therapeutics, Blueprint Medicines, Moderna Therapeutics, Tesaro, Alexo Therapeutics, Array BioPharmaNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Cutaneous, ocular, and mucosal melanomas are histologically indistinguishable tumors that are driven by a different spectrum of genetic alterations. With current methods, identification of the site of origin of a melanoma metastasis is challenging. DNA methylation profiling has shown promise for the identification of the site of tumor origin in various settings. Here we explore the DNA methylation landscape of melanomas from different sites and analyze if different melanoma origins can be distinguished by their epigenetic profile. We performed DNA methylation analysis, next generation DNA panel sequencing, and copy number analysis of 82 non-cutaneous and 25 cutaneous melanoma samples. We further analyzed eight normal melanocyte cell culture preparations. DNA methylation analysis separated uveal melanomas from melanomas of other primary sites. Mucosal, conjunctival, and cutaneous melanomas shared a common global DNA methylation profile. Still, we observed location-dependent DNA methylation differences in cancer-related genes, such as low frequencies of RARB (7/63) and CDKN2A promoter methylation (6/63) in mucosal melanomas, or a high frequency of APC promoter methylation in conjunctival melanomas (6/9). Furthermore, all investigated melanomas of the paranasal sinus showed loss of PTEN expression (9/9), mainly caused by promoter methylation. This was less frequently seen in melanomas of other sites (24/98). Copy number analysis revealed recurrent amplifications in mucosal melanomas, including chromosomes 4q, 5p, 11q and 12q. Most melanomas of the oral cavity showed gains of chromosome 5p with TERT amplification (8/10), while 11q amplifications were enriched in melanomas of the nasal cavity (7/16). In summary, mucosal, conjunctival, and cutaneous melanomas show a surprisingly similar global DNA methylation profile and identification of the site of origin by DNA methylation testing is likely not feasible. Still, our study demonstrates tumor location-dependent differences of promoter methylation frequencies in specific cancer-related genes together with tumor site-specific enrichment for specific chromosomal changes and genetic mutations. © 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland., (© 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Background: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) represents a palliative treatment resulting in induction of inflammatory reactions with importance for the development of an antitumor immunity. Cancer/testis antigens (CTAs) have been associated with poor prognosis in different types of cancer, including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)., Materials and Methods: Tumor tissue samples before and after PDT were evaluated for the expression of four different CTAs by immunohistochemistry. Expression intensity and subcellular expression pattern were assessed., Results: Before PDT, expression of any CTA was detectable in 91%. Comparing the overall expression of CTAs, a decreased expression of all melanoma-associated antigens (MAGEs) post-treatment and a slightly increased expression of New York esophageal squamous cell carcinoma 1 (NY-ESO-1) was visible. The simultaneous cytoplasmic and nuclear expression of pan-MAGE or MAGE-A3/A4 correlated with reduced treatment-failure-free-survival (TFFS)., Conclusion: This study investigated the impact of PDT on CTA expression in HNSCC, detecting modified expression patterns after PDT. These changes may have been caused by immunological pressure or epigenetic regulation of CTA expression., (Copyright© 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved.)