Search

Abstract Background Biomarkers that effectively predict response to anti-PD-1 mAb therapy in cancer patients are an unmet need. We evaluated the utility of small extracellular vesicles (sEV) as biomarkers of response to immunotherapy in recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. Methods Plasma sEV were isolated from 24 R/M HNSCC patients prior to immunotherapy initiation. sEV were separated by immune capture into T cell-derived CD3(+) and tumor-enriched CD3(−) subsets. Stimulatory and suppressive profiles of CD3(−) sEV were determined by on-bead flow cytometry. Differences were assessed using nonparametric tests. Multivariable Cox regression was used to evaluate the relationship with overall (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Results CD3(−)CD44v3(+) sEV represented the majority of plasma sEV; the T-cell-derived CD3(+) fraction was significantly smaller. High CD3(+) sEV was associated with better OS and PFS. Total CD3(−)CD44v3(+) sEV was not associated with outcome. However, suppressive and stimulatory profiles were associated with OS; the suppressive/stimulatory ratio was associated with best response. Exploration of individual proteins on CD3(−) sEV showed that high PD-L1 and high CTLA-4 were associated with better outcomes. Conclusions Evaluation of the T cell-derived-CD3(+) and tumor-enriched CD3(−) plasma sEV subsets indicated their potential utility as biomarkers of response to immunotherapy.

Not available.

Small extracellular vesicles (sEV) are small membrane-bound nanovesicles with a size range below 200 nm that are released by all types of cells. sEV carry a diverse cargo of proteins, lipids, glycans, and nucleic acids that mimic the content of producer cells. sEV mediate intercellular communication and play a key role in a broad variety of physiological and pathological conditions. Recently, numerous reports have emerged examining the role of sEV in viral infections. A significant number of similarities in the sEV biogenesis pathways and the replication cycles of viruses suggest that sEV might influence the course of viral infections in diverse ways. Besides directly modulating virus propagation by transporting the viral cargo (complete virions, proteins, RNA, and DNA), sEV can also modify the host antiviral response and increase the susceptibility of cells to infection. The network of mutual interactions is particularly complex in the case of oncogenic viruses, deserving special consideration because of its significance in cancer progression. This review summarizes the current knowledge of interactions between sEV and oncogenic viruses, focusing on sEV abilities to modulate the carcinogenic properties of oncoviruses.

Abstract Small extracellular vesicles (sEV) in TNBC patients’ plasma promote T cell dysfunction and tumor progression. Here we show that tumor cell-derived exosomes (TEX) carrying surface PDL-1, PD-1, Fas, FasL, TRAIL, CTLA-4 and TGF-β1 induce apoptosis of CD8+T and CD4+T cells but spare B and NK cells. Inhibitors blocking TEX-induce receptor/ligand signals and TEX pretreatments with proteinase K or heat fail to prevent T cell apoptosis. Cytochalasin D, Dynosore or Pit Stop 2, partly inhibit TEX uptake but do not prevent T cell apoptosis. TEX entry into T cells induces cytochrome C and Smac release from mitochondria and caspase-3 and PARP cleavage in the cytosol. Expression of survival proteins is reduced in T cells undergoing apoptosis. Independently of external death receptor signaling, TEX entry into T cells induces mitochondrial stress, initiating relentless intrinsic apoptosis, which is responsible for death of activated T cells in the tumor-bearing hosts. The abundance of TEX in cancer plasma represents a danger for adoptively transferred T cells, limiting their therapeutic potential.

The small extracellular vesicles (sEV) accumulating in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients’ plasma are mixtures of vesicles produced by leukemic and non-malignant cells. sEV originating from leukemia blasts could serve as potential non-invasive biomarkers of AML response to therapy. To isolate blast-derived sEV from patients’ plasma, we developed a bioprinted microarray-based immunoassay using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) specific for leukemia-associated antigens (LAAs) and mAbs specific for a mix of tetraspanins (CD9, CD63, and CD81). We determined the proportion of LAA+ sEV relative to total plasma sEV (the LAA+/total sEV ratio) in serially collected samples of newly diagnosed AML patients prior to, during, and after chemotherapy. At AML diagnosis, the LAA+/total sEV ratio was significantly higher in patients than in healthy donors (HDs). In patients who achieved complete remission (CR) after induction chemotherapy, the LAA+/total sEV ratios significantly decreased after each chemotherapy cycle to levels seen in HDs. In contrast, the LAA+/total sEV ratios in AML patients with persistent leukemia after therapy remained elevated during and after therapy, as did the percentage of leukemic blasts in these patients’ bone marrows. The LAA+/total sEV ratio emerges as a promising non-invasive biomarker of leukemia response to therapy.

Abstract Reactive astrocytes (RA) secrete lipocalin-2 (LCN2) glycoprotein that regulates diverse cellular processes including cell death/survival, inflammation, iron delivery and cell differentiation. Elevated levels of LCN2 are considered as a biomarker of brain injury, however, the underlying regulatory mechanisms of its expression and release are not well understood. In this study, we investigated the role of astrocytic Na+/H+ exchanger 1 (NHE1) in regulating reactive astrocyte LCN2 secretion and neurodegeneration after stroke. Astrocyte specific deletion of Nhe1 in Gfap-Cre ER+/− ;Nhe1 f/f mice reduced astrogliosis and astrocytic LCN2 and GFAP expression, which was associated with reduced loss of NeuN+ and GRP78+ neurons in stroke brains. In vitro ischemia in astrocyte cultures triggered a significant increase of secreted LCN2 in astrocytic exosomes, which caused neuronal cell death and neurodegeneration. Inhibition of NHE1 activity during in vitro ischemia with its potent inhibitor HOE642 significantly reduced astrocytic LCN2+ exosome secretion. In elucidating the cellular mechanisms, we found that stroke triggered activation of NADPH oxidase (NOX)-NF-κB signaling and ROS-mediated LCN2 expression. Inhibition of astrocytic NHE1 activity attenuated NOX signaling and LCN2-mediated neuronal apoptosis and neurite degeneration. Our findings demonstrate for the first time that RA use NOX signaling to stimulate LCN2 expression and secretion. Blocking astrocytic NHE1 activity is beneficial to reduce LCN2-mediated neurotoxicity after stroke.

Tumor-derived exosomes (TEX) are a subset of small extracellular vesicles (sEV) present in all body fluids of patients with cancer. In plasma of patients with metastatic melanoma, numbers of exosomes produced by melanoma cells called MTEX are elevated. To study the role of MTEX in melanoma progression, immunoaffinity-based separation of MTEX from total plasma exosomes was performed. The surface of MTEX was decorated by various checkpoint inhibitory proteins, and upon coincubation with immune recipient cells, MTEX suppressed anti-tumor functions of these cells. MTEX emerge as a major mechanism of immune suppression in melanoma and thus might play a role in promoting melanoma progression.

Abstract Transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) is a major component of tumor‐derived small extracellular vesicles (TEX) in cancer patients. Mechanisms utilized by TGFβ+ TEX to promote tumor growth and pro‐tumor activities in the tumor microenvironment (TME) are largely unknown. TEX produced by head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines carried TGFβ and angiogenesis‐promoting proteins. TGFβ+ TEX stimulated macrophage chemotaxis without a notable M1/M2 phenotype shift and reprogrammed primary human macrophages to a pro‐angiogenic phenotype characterized by the upregulation of pro‐angiogenic factors and functions. In a murine basement membrane extract plug model, TGFβ+ TEX promoted macrophage infiltration and vascularization (p < 0.001), which was blocked by using the TGFβ ligand trap mRER (p < 0.001). TGFβ+ TEX injected into mice undergoing the 4‐nitroquinoline‐1‐oxide (4‐NQO)‐driven oral carcinogenesis promoted tumor angiogenesis (p < 0.05), infiltration of M2‐like macrophages in the TME (p < 0.05) and ultimately tumor progression (p < 0.05). Inhibition of TGFβ signaling in TEX with mRER ameliorated these pro‐tumor activities. Silencing of TGFβ emerges as a critical step in suppressing pro‐angiogenic functions of TEX in HNSCC.

Exosomes mediate intercellular communication, shuttling messages between cells and tissues. We explored whether exosome tissue sequestration is determined by the exosomes or the tissues using ten radiolabeled exosomes from human or murine, cancerous or noncancerous cell lines. We measured sequestration of these exosomes by the liver, kidney, spleen, and lung after intravenous injection into male CD-1 mice. Except for kidney sequestration of three exosomes, all exosomes were incorporated by all tissues, but sequestration levels varied greatly among exosomes and tissues. Species of origin (mouse vs. human) or source (cancerous vs. noncancerous cells) did not influence tissue sequestration. Sequestration of J774A.1 exosomes by liver involved the mannose-6 phosphate (M6P) receptor. Wheatgerm agglutinin (WGA) or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) treatments enhanced sequestration of exosomes by brain and lung but inhibited sequestration by liver and spleen. Response to LPS was not predictive of response to WGA. Path and heat map analyses included our published results for brain and found distinct clusters among the exosomes and the tissues. In conclusion, we found no evidence for a universal binding site controlling exosome-tissue interactions. Instead, sequestration of exosomes by tissues is differentially regulated by both exosomes and tissues and may be stimulated or inhibited by WGA and inflammation.

ABSTRACT Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have recently garnered attention for their participation in host-microbe interactions in pneumococcal infections. However, the effect of EVs on the host immune system remain poorly understood. Our studies focus on EVs produced by Streptococcus pneumoniae (pEVs), and reveal that pEVs are internalized by macrophages, T cells, and epithelial cells. In vitro, pEVs induce NF-κB activation in a dosage-dependent manner and polarize human macrophages to an alternative (M2) phenotype. In addition, pEV pretreatment conditions macrophages to increase bacteria uptake and such macrophages may act as a reservoir for pneumococcal cells by increasing survival of the phagocytosed bacteria. When administered systemically in mice, pEVs induce cytokine release; when immobilized locally, they recruit lymphocytes and macrophages. Taken together, pEVs emerge as critical contributors to inflammatory responses and tissue damage in mammalian hosts. IMPORTANCE Over the last decade, pathogen-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as important players in several human diseases. Therefore, a thorough understanding of EV-mediated mechanisms could provide novel insights into vaccine/therapeutic development. A critical question in the field is: do pathogen-derived EVs help the pathogen evade the harsh environment in the host or do they help the host to mount a robust immune response against the pathogen? This study is a step towards answering this critical question for the Gram-positive pathogen, Streptococcus pneumoniae. Our study shows that while S. pneumoniae EVs (pEVs) induce inflammatory response both in vitro and in vivo, they may also condition the host macrophages to serve as a reservoir for the bacteria.

Abstract Molecular profiling of small extracellular vesicles (sEV) isolated from plasma of cancer patients emerges as promising strategy for biomarkers discovery. We investigated the proteomic profiles of sEV immunoselected using anti‐CSPG4 antibodies from 15 melanoma patients’ plasma. The proteomes of sEV separated into melanoma cell‐derived (MTEX) and non‐malignant cell‐derived (NMTEX) were compared using high‐resolution mass spectrometry. Paired analysis identified the MTEX‐associated profile of 16 proteins that discriminated MTEX from NMETEX. We also identified the MTEX profile that discriminated between seven patients with no evidence of melanoma (NED) after therapy and eight with progressive disease (PD). Among 75 MTEX proteins overexpressed in PD patients, PDCD6IP (ALIX) had the highest discriminating value, while CNTN1 (contactin‐1) was upregulated only in MTEX of NED patients. This is the first report documenting that proteomes of tumour‐derived sEV in patients’ plasma discriminate cancer from non‐cancer and identify proteins with potential to serve as prognostic biomarkers in melanoma.

The molecular cargo of tumor-cell-derived exosomes (TEX) mimics that of parental tumor cells. Thus, TEX could potentially serve as noninvasive biomarkers of cancer progression. However, separation of TEX from non-TEX in patients’ plasma requires tumor antigen-specific detection reagents. CD44v3 has been of interest as a potential biomarker of disease progression in HNSCC, because its overexpression in tumor cells associates with poor outcome. Here, CD44v3+ TEX immunocaptured from plasma of 44 HNSCC patients and 7 healthy donors (HDs) were evaluated as potential biomarkers of disease activity and stage. Exosomes were isolated from plasma of by size exclusion chromatography. Using anti-CD44v3 or anti-CD3 mAbs on beads, CD44v3+ TEX CD3(-)TEX-enriched exosomes were immunocaptured from supernatants of nonmalignant or HNSCC cell lines and from patients’ plasma. On-bead flow cytometry was used for the detection of FAS-L, PD-L1, TGFF-β. CSPG4 or EGFR on exosomes. The TEX expression profiles were correlated to clinicopathological parameters. Relative florescence intensity (RFI) values for CD44v3 were higher (p

Most patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) experience disease recurrence after chemotherapy largely due to the development of drug resistance. Small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) are known to play a significant role in leukaemia drug resistance by delivery of anti-apoptotic proteins and genes conferring resistance to recipient cells. sEV levels are elevated in AML patients’ plasma at the time of diagnosis and remain elevated in complete remission after chemotherapy. The mechanism of enhanced sEV secretion in AML is unknown. We speculated that cholesterol synthesis by AML blasts may be related to elevated sEV secretion. Intracellular levels of cholesterol and of HMGCR (3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase), the rate-limiting enzyme in cholesterol synthesizing mevalonate pathway, significantly increased in cultured AML cells or primary human non-malignant cells treated with cytarabine or decitabine. Concomitantly, levels of sEVs produced by these cells also increased. Treatment with an HMGCR inhibitor, Simvastatin, or siRNAs targeting HMGCR blocked the chemotherapy-induced enhancement of sEV secretion in AML cells. sEVs carry HMGCR and chemotherapy enhances HMGCR levels in sEVs. HMGCR+ sEVs upregulate intracellular cholesterol and promote AML cell proliferation. A pharmacologic blockade of HMGCR emerges as a potential future therapeutic option for disrupting sEV signalling leading to cholesterol-driven chemo-resistance in AML.

Emerging studies suggest that extracellular vesicles (EVs) mediating intercellular communication in the tumor microenvironment (TME) play a key role in driving cancer progression. Tumor-derived small EVs or exosomes (TEX) enriched in immunosuppressive proteins or in microRNAs targeting suppressive pathways in recipient cells contribute to reprogramming the TME into a cancer-promoting milieu. The adenosinergic pathway is an acknowledged major contributor to tumor-induced immune suppression. TEX carry the components of this pathway and utilize ATP to produce adenosine (ADO). TEX-associated ADO emerges as a key factor in the suppression of T cell responses to therapy. Here, the significance of the ADO pathway in TEX is discussed as a highly effective mechanism of cancer-driven immune cell suppression and of resistance to immune therapies.

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) play a key role in health and disease, including cancer. Tumors produce a mix of EVs differing in size, cellular origin, biogenesis and molecular content. Small EVs (sEV) or exosomes are a subset of 30–150 nm (virus–size) vesicles originating from the multivesicular bodies (MVBs) and carrying a cargo that in its content and topography approximates that of a parent cell. Tumor-derived exosomes (TEX) present in all body fluids of cancer patients, are considered promising candidates for a liquid tumor biopsy. TEX also mediate immunoregulatory activities: they maintain a crosstalk between the tumor and various non-malignant cells, including immunocytes. Effects that EVs exert on immune cells may be immunosuppressive or immunostimulatory. Here, we review the available data for TEX interactions with immunocytes, focusing on strategies that allow isolation from plasma and separation of TEX from sEV produced by non-malignant cells. Immune effects mediated by either of the subsets can now be distinguished and measured. The approach has allowed for the comparison of molecular and functional profiles of the two sEV fractions in plasma of cancer patients. While TEX carried an excess of immunosuppressive proteins and inhibited immune cell functions in vitro and in vivo, the sEV derived from non-malignant cells, including CD3(+)T cells, were variably enriched in immunostimulatory proteins and could promote functions of immunocytes. Thus, sEV in plasma of cancer patients are heterogenous, representing a complex molecular network which is not evident in healthy donors’ plasma. Importantly, TEX appear to be able to reprogram functions of non-malignant CD3(+)T cells inducing them to produce CD3(+)sEV enriched in immunosuppressive proteins. Ratios of stimulatory/inhibitory proteins carried by TEX and by CD3(+)sEV derived from reprogrammed non-malignant cells vary broadly in patients and appear to negatively correlate with disease progression. Simultaneous capture from plasma and functional/molecular profiling of TEX and the CD3(+)sEV fractions allows for defining their role as cancer biomarkers and as monitors of cancer patients’ immune competence, respectively.

Purpose: Exosomes, small extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from the endocytic compartment of their parent cells, are present in plasma of cancer patients and may serve as non-invasive biomarkers of disease outcome. Here, we asked whether tumor-derived (TEX) and/or T-cell derived exosomes can predict outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients treated with oncological therapy. Materials and Methods: 18 HNSCC patients enrolled in phase I clinical trial and receiving a combination of cetuximab, ipilimumab and radiation therapy were serially monitored for TEX and T cell-derived exosomes. Exosomes isolated from plasma by size exclusion chromatography were fractionated into TEX and CD3 + T cell-derived exosomes by immunocapture. Exosome-associated proteins were quantified by on-bead flow cytometry. Exosome molecular cargos of patients whose tumors recurred within 2 years (N = 5) were compared to cargos of patients who remained disease free at 2 years (N = 13) after therapy. Results: The predictive value of the exosome molecular cargo for disease recurrence was evaluated pre-, during and post therapy. In patients whose disease recurred, total exosome proteins, TEX/total exosome ratios, total CD3+, CD3(-)PD-L1+ and CD3 + 15s+ (Treg-derived) exosomes increased from the baseline levels. In patients who remained disease free, total exosome protein and TEX levels decreased, CD3+ and CD3+ CD15s+ exosomes stabilized and CD3+ CTLA4+ exosomes declined after ipilimumab therapy. Conclusion: TEX and T cell-derived circulating exosomes instead of immune cells were used for monitoring of patients’ responses to oncological therapy. The results support the potential role of exosomes as a non-invasive tumor and immune cell biomarkers in cancer.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is an etiologic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). HPV(+) cancers respond favorably to therapy potentially due to more robust anti-tumor immune responses. We hypothesized that tumor-derived exosomes (TEX) produced by HPV(+) or HPV(-) HNSCCs differentially modulate anti-tumor immune responses. Proteomes of exosomes from HPV(+) and HPV(-) HNSCC cell lines were compared in search for proteins putatively involved in the communication with immune system. TEX were isolated from supernatants of HPV(+) (SCC-2, SCC-47, and SCC-90) or HPV(-) (PCI-13 and PCI-30) cells by size exclusion chromatography. A comparison of proteome profiles was performed by high-resolution mass spectrometry. The presence and biological activity of selected immunoregulatory proteins were validated by flow cytometry and co-incubation assays. Exosomes produced by SCC-90 and PCI-30 cells contained 711 proteins, including 80 proteins specific for HPV(+) exosomes and 77 specific for HPV(-) exosomes, associated with similar GO terms such as regulation of cell growth, metabolism, communication, and cellular signaling. Search for proteins localized in the membrane and involved in immune regulation identified a few proteins detected specifically in HPV(+) or HPV(-) exosomes. Only HPV(+) exosomes were enriched in immune effector cell-related CD47 and CD276 antigens; only HPV(-) exosomes contained tumor-protective/growth-promoting antigens, MUC-1 and HLA-DA. Flow cytometry and Western blots confirmed the reciprocal presence/paucity of these proteins in a whole panel of tumor cells and corresponding exosomes. The differential content of protein cargos in HPV(+) and HPV(-) exosomes might contribute to the disparity in immune responses that characterize HPV(+) and HPV(-) HNSCC.

Tumour-derived exosomes (TEX) are a subset of extracellular vesicles (EVs) present in body fluids of patients with cancer. The role of this exosome subset in melanoma progression has been of interest ever since ex vivo studies of exosomes produced by melanoma cell lines were shown to suppress anti-melanoma immune responses. To study the impact of melanoma-derived exosomes (MTEX) present in patients’ plasma on melanoma progression, isolation of MTEX from total plasma exosomes is necessary. We have developed an immunoaffinity-based method for MTEX capture from plasma of melanoma patients. Using mAb 763.74 specific for the CSPG4 epitope uniquely expressed on melanoma cells, we separated MTEX from non-tumour cell-derived exosomes and evaluated the protein cargo of both fractions by quantitative flow cytometry. Melanoma-associated antigens were carried by MTEX but were not detectable in exosomes produced by normal cells. Separation of plasma-derived MTEX from non-MTEX provides an opportunity for future evaluation of MTEX as potential biomarkers of melanoma progression and as surrogates of melanoma in tumour liquid biopsy studies.

Objective: Isolation from human plasma of exosomes that retain functional and morphological integrity for probing their protein, lipid and nucleic acid content is a priority for the future use of exosomes as biomarkers. A method that meets these criteria and can be scaled up for patient monitoring is thus desirable. Methods: Plasma specimens (1 mL) of patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) or a head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) were differentially centrifuged, ultrafiltered and fractionated by size exclusion chromatography in small disposable columns (mini-SEC). Exosomes were eluted in phosphate-buffered saline and were evaluated by qNano for particle size and counts, morphology by transmission electron microscopy, protein content, molecular profiles by western blots, and for ability to modify functions of immune cells. Results: Exosomes eluting in fractions #3–5 had a diameter ranging from 50 to 200 nm by qNano, with the fraction #4 containing the bulk of clean, unaggregated exosomes. The exosome elution profiles remained constant for repeated runs of the same plasma. Larger plasma volumes could be fractionated running multiple mini-SEC columns in parallel. Particle concentrations per millilitre of plasma in #4 fractions of AML and HNSCC were comparable and were higher (p

Human papillomavirus (HPV)(+) and HPV(−) head and neck cancer (HNC) cells’ interactions with the host immune system are poorly understood. Recently, we identified molecular and functional differences in exosomes produced by HPV(+) vs. HPV(−) cells, suggesting that genetic cargos of exosomes might identify novel biomarkers in HPV-related HNCs. Exosomes were isolated by size exclusion chromatography from supernatants of three HPV(+) and two HPV(−) HNC cell lines. Paired cell lysates and exosomes were analyzed for messenger RNA (mRNA) by qRT-PCR and microRNA (miR) contents by nanostring analysis. The mRNA profiles of HPV(+) vs. HPV(−) cells were distinct, with EGFR, TP53 and HSPA1A/B overexpressed in HPV(+) cells and IL6, FAS and DPP4 in HPV(−) cells. The mRNA profiles of HPV(+) or HPV(−) exosomes resembled the cargo of their parent cells. miR expression profiles in cell lysates identified 8 miRs expressed in HPV(−) cells vs. 14 miRs in HPV(+) cells. miR-205-5p was exclusively expressed in HPV(+) exosomes, and miR-1972 was only detected in HPV(−) exosomes. We showed that HPV(+) and HPV(−) exosomes recapitulated the mRNA expression profiles of their parent cells. Expression of miRs was dependent on the HPV status, and miR-205-5p in HPV(+) and miR-1972 in HPV(−) exosomes emerge as potential discriminating HPV-associated biomarkers.

Interactions between tumor cells and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are critical for glioblastoma progression. The TAMs represent up to 30% of the glioblastoma mass. The role of TAMs in tumor progression and in the mechanisms underlying tumor growth remain unclear. Using an in vitro model resembling the crosstalk between macrophages and glioblastoma cells, we show that glioblastoma-derived exosomes (GBex) reprogram M1 (mediate pro-inflammatory function) and M2 (mediate anti-inflammatory function) macrophages, converting M1 into TAMs and augmenting pro-tumor functions of M2 macrophages. In turn, these GBex-reprogrammed TAMs, produce exosomes decorated by immunosuppressive and tumor-growth promoting proteins. TAM-derived exosomes disseminate these proteins in the tumor microenvironment (TME) promoting tumor cell migration and proliferation. Mechanisms underlying the promotion of glioblastoma growth involved Arginase-1+ exosomes produced by the reprogrammed TAMs. A selective Arginase-1 inhibitor, nor-NOHA reversed growth-promoting effects of Arginase-1 carried by TAM-derived exosomes. The data suggest that GBex-reprogrammed Arginase-1+ TAMs emerge as a major source of exosomes promoting tumor growth and as a potential therapeutic target in glioblastoma.

Extracellular vesicles can cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB), but little is known about passage. Here, we used multiple-time regression analysis to examine the ability of 10 exosome populations derived from mouse, human, cancerous, and non-cancerous cell lines to cross the BBB. All crossed the BBB, but rates varied over 10-fold. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), an activator of the innate immune system, enhanced uptake independently of BBB disruption for six exosomes and decreased uptake for one. Wheatgerm agglutinin (WGA) modulated transport of five exosome populations, suggesting passage by adsorptive transcytosis. Mannose 6-phosphate inhibited uptake of J774A.1, demonstrating that its BBB transporter is the mannose 6-phosphate receptor. Uptake rates, patterns, and effects of LPS or WGA were not predicted by exosome source (mouse vs. human) or cancer status of the cell lines. The cell surface proteins CD46, AVβ6, AVβ3, and ICAM-1 were variably expressed but not predictive of transport rate nor responses to LPS or WGA. A brain-to-blood efflux mechanism variably affected CNS retention and explains how CNS-derived exosomes enter blood. In summary, all exosomes tested here readily crossed the BBB, but at varying rates and by a variety of vesicular-mediated mechanisms involving specific transporters, adsorptive transcytosis, and a brain-to-blood efflux system.

Exosomes produced by tumor cells have been shown to reprogram functions of human immune cells. Molecular cargos of exosomes isolated from supernatants of HPV(+) and HPV(−) head and neck cancer (HNC) cell lines or from HNC patients' plasma were compared. The exosome protein profiles resembled those of respective parent tumor cells. Only HPV(+) exosomes carried E6/E7, p16, and survivin. HPV(−) exosomes were negative for cyclin D1 and carried low p53 levels. Immunomodulatory molecules (TGF-β, FasL, OX40, OX40L, and HSP70) were carried by HPV(+) and HPV(−) exosomes. These exosomes co-incubated with human T cells induced apoptosis and suppressed T cell activation and proliferation. HPV(−) exosomes suppressed DC maturation and expression of antigen processing machinery (APM) components. In contrast, HPV(+) exosomes promoted DC maturation and did not suppress expression of APM components in mature DCs. While DCs readily internalized exosomes, T lymphocytes resisted their uptake during the initial 12 h co-culture. Thus, HPV(+) exosomes capable of sustaining DC functions may play a key role in promoting anti-tumor immune responses thereby improving outcome in patients with HPV(+) cancers.

Tumor-derived exosomes (TEX) are ubiquitously present in the tumor microenvironment and plasma of cancer patients. TEX carry a cargo of multiple stimulatory and inhibitory molecules and deliver them to recipient cells, serving as a communication network for the tumor. The mechanisms TEX use for delivering messages to recipient cells were evaluated using PKH26-labeled TEX produced by cultured human tumor cells, exosomes produced by dendritic cells-derived exosomes (DEX), or exosomes isolated from plasma of cancer patients (EXO). Human T-cell subsets, B cells, NK cells, and monocytes were co-incubated with TEX, DEX, or EXO and binding or internalization of labeled vesicles was evaluated by confocal microscopy and/or Amnis-based flow cytometry. Vesicle-induced Ca2+ influx in recipient T cells was monitored, and TEX-induced inosine production in Treg was determined by mass spectrometry. In contrast to B cells, NK cells or monocytes, conventional T cells did not internalize labeled vesicles. Minimal exosome uptake was only evident in Treg following prolonged co-incubation with TEX. All exosomes induced Ca2+ influx in T cells, with TEX and EXO isolated from cancer patients' plasma delivering the strongest, sustained signaling to Treg. Such sustained signaling resulted in the significant upregulation of the conversion of extracellular ATP to inosine (adenosine metabolite) by Treg, suggesting that TEX signaling could have functional consequences in these recipient cells. Thus, modulation of Treg suppressor functions by TEX is mediated by mechanisms dependent on cell surface signaling and does not require TEX internalization by recipient cells.

A growing body of evidence emphasizes the important role exosomes in different physiological and pathological conditions. Exosomes, virus-size extracellular vesicles (EVs), carry a complex molecular cargo, which is actively processed in the endocytic compartment of parental cells. Exosomes carry and deliver this cargo to recipient cells, serving as an intercellular communication system. The methods for recovery of exosomes from supernatants of cell lines or body fluids are not uniformly established. Yet, studies of the quality and quantity of exosome cargos underlie the concept of “liquid biopsy.” Exosomes are emerging as a potentially useful diagnostic tool and a predictor of disease progression, response to therapy and overall survival. Although many novel approaches to exosome isolation and analysis of their cargos have been introduced, the role of exosomes as diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers of disease remains unconfirmed. This review considers existing challenges to exosome validation as disease biomarkers. Focusing on advantages and limitations of methods for exosome isolation and characterization, approaches are proposed to facilitate further progress in the development of exosomes as biomarkers in human disease.

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have recently emerged as an intercellular communication system that plays an important role in health and becomes dysfunctional in disease [...]

Tumor-derived exosomes (TEX) are emerging as critical components of an intercellular information network between the tumor and the host. The tumor escapes from the host immune system by using a variety of mechanisms designed to impair or eliminate anti-tumor immunity. TEX carrying a cargo of immunoinhibitory molecules and factors represent one such mechanism. TEX, which are present in all body fluids of cancer patients, deliver negative molecular or genetic signals to immune cells re-programming their functions. Although TEX can also stimulate immune activity, in the microenvironments dominated by the tumor, TEX tend to mediate immune suppression thus promoting tumor progression. The TEX content, in part resembling that of the parent cell, may serve as a source of cancer biomarkers. TEX also interfere with immune therapies. A better understanding of TEX and their contribution to cancer progression and cancer patients’ response to immune therapies represents a challenging new field of investigation.

Background Natural killer cell cytotoxicity is decreased in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in comparison to that in normal controls. Tumor-derived microvesicles present in patients’ sera exert detrimental effects on immune cells and may influence tumor progression.Design and Methods We investigated the microvesicle protein level, molecular profile and suppression of natural killer cell activity in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.Results The patients’ sera contained higher levels of microvesicles compared to the levels in controls (P