Search

Objectives: Severe cases of COVID-19 pneumonia can lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Release of interleukin (IL)-33, an epithelial-derived alarmin, and IL-33/ST2 pathway activation are linked with ARDS development in other viral infections. IL-22, a cytokine that modulates innate immunity through multiple regenerative and protective mechanisms in lung epithelial cells, is reduced in patients with ARDS. This study aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of astegolimab, a human immunoglobulin G2 monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits the IL-33 receptor, ST2, or efmarodocokin alfa, a human IL-22 fusion protein that activates IL-22 signaling, for treatment of severe COVID-19 pneumonia., Design: Phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (COVID-astegolimab-IL)., Setting: Hospitals., Patients: Hospitalized adults with severe COVID-19 pneumonia., Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive IV astegolimab, efmarodocokin alfa, or placebo, plus standard of care. The primary endpoint was time to recovery, defined as time to a score of 1 or 2 on a 7-category ordinal scale by day 28., Measurements and Main Results: The study randomized 396 patients. Median time to recovery was 11 days (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01 d; p = 0.93) and 10 days (HR, 1.15 d; p = 0.38) for astegolimab and efmarodocokin alfa, respectively, versus 10 days for placebo. Key secondary endpoints (improved recovery, mortality, or prevention of worsening) showed no treatment benefits. No new safety signals were observed and adverse events were similar across treatment arms. Biomarkers demonstrated that both drugs were pharmacologically active., Conclusions: Treatment with astegolimab or efmarodocokin alfa did not improve time to recovery in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia., Competing Interests: Dr. Waters has received funding from Genentech paid to his institution for the conduct of this trial. Dr. McKinnell has received funding from Genentech paid to his institution for the conduct of this trial; he reports receiving research funding paid to his institution from Gilead, Eli Lilly and Company, and Duke University; and he received funding from Pfizer and ThermoFisher. Dr. Martin has received compensation for service as a monitor of the COVID-astegolimab-interleukin trial. Dr. Buchman serves as a Senior Advisor to Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under an agreement between his employer, Emory University, and that agency; he also serves as Editor-in-Chief of Critical Care Medicine, and Emory University similarly receives payment for that service from the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Drs. McKinnell, Martin, Buchman, Theess, Lekkerkerker, Staton, Rosenberger, Pappu, Wang, Zhang, Brooks, Cheung, Galanter, Chen, Mohan, and Peck disclosed the off-label product use of Astegolimab and Efmarodocokin Alfa. Dr. Theess is currently an employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche and owns Roche stock. Drs. Staton and Wang are former employees of Genentech and own Roche stock. Dr. Chen is a former employee of Genentech. Drs. Martin, Theess, Yang, Lekkerkerker, Staton, Rosenberger, Pappu, Wang, Zhang, Cheung, Galanter, Chen, Mohan, and Peck received funding from Genentech. Drs. Theess’s, Lekkerkerker’s, Staton’s, Rosenberger’s, Wang’s, Zhang’s, Cheung’s, Chen’s, Mohan’s, and Peck’s institutions received funding from the Department of Health and Human Services, the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, and the BARDA (OT number: HHSO100201800036C). Drs. Theess, Yang, Lekkerkerker, Staton, Rosenberger, Pappu, Wang, Zhang, Brooks, Cheung, Galanter, Chen, Mohan, and Peck are employees of Genentech, a member of the Roche group, and own Roche stock. Drs. Theess and Brooks disclosed they are employed by F. Hoffman-LaRoche. Drs. Theess, Lekkerkerker, Staton, Rosenberger, Pappu, Wang, Zhang, Brooks, Cheung, Galanter, Chen, Mohan, and Peck disclosed work for hire. Dr. Brooks disclosed that he is a Principal Computational Researcher at Genentech. Dr. Kalil has disclosed that he does not have any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: The binding of IL-33 to its receptor ST2 (alias of IL1RL1) leads to the release of inflammatory mediators and may play a role in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis. Astegolimab is a fully human, IgG 2 mAb that binds to ST2 and inhibits IL-33 signaling., Objectives: This study sought to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of astegolimab in patients with atopic dermatitis., Methods: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study in which adults with chronic atopic dermatitis were randomized 1:1 to receive astegolimab 490 mg every 4 weeks or placebo, for 16 weeks. The primary outcome was the percentage of change from baseline to week 16 of the Eczema Area and Severity Index score., Results: A total of 65 patients were enrolled in the study (placebo, n = 32; astegolimab, n = 33). The adjusted mean percentage of change from baseline to week 16 in the Eczema Area and Severity Index score was -51.47% for astegolimab compared with -58.24% for placebo, with a nonsignificant treatment difference of 6.77% (95% CI: -16.57-30.11; P = .5624). No differences were observed between treatment groups for secondary efficacy outcomes and in exploratory biomarkers (blood eosinophils, serum IL-5, serum CCL13). With the use of loading dose, pharmacokinetic exposure was sufficient from week 1. Astegolimab was well-tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with that observed in previous clinical trials., Conclusions: In patients with atopic dermatitis, astegolimab did not show a significant difference compared to placebo for the primary or secondary outcomes., (Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The IL-33/ST2 pathway is linked with asthma susceptibility. Inhaled allergens, pollutants, and respiratory viruses, which trigger asthma exacerbations, induce release of IL-33, an epithelial-derived "alarmin." Astegolimab, a human IgG 2 mAb, selectively inhibits the IL-33 receptor, ST2. Approved biologic therapies for severe asthma mainly benefit patients with elevated blood eosinophils (type 2-high), but limited options are available for patients with low blood eosinophils (type 2-low). Inhibiting IL-33 signaling may target pathogenic pathways in a wider spectrum of asthmatics., Objectives: This study evaluated astegolimab efficacy and safety in patients with severe asthma., Methods: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study (ZENYATTA [A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of MSTT1041A in Participants With Uncontrolled Severe Asthma]) randomized 502 adults with severe asthma to subcutaneous placebo or 70-mg, 210-mg, or 490-mg doses of astegolimab every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the annualized asthma exacerbation rate (AER) at week 54. Enrollment caps ensured ∼30 patients who were eosinophil-high (≥300 cells/μL) and ∼95 patients who were eosinophil-low (<300 cells/μL) per arm., Results: Overall, adjusted AER reductions relative to placebo were 43% (P = .005), 22% (P = .18), and 37% (P = .01) for 490-mg, 210-mg, and 70-mg doses of astegolimab, respectively. Adjusted AER reductions for patients who were eosinophil-low were comparable to reductions in the overall population: 54% (P = .002), 14% (P = .48), and 35% (P = .05) for 490-mg, 210-mg, and 70-mg doses of astegolimab. Adverse events were similar in astegolimab- and placebo-treated groups., Conclusions: Astegolimab reduced AER in a broad population of patients, including those who were eosinophil-low, with inadequately controlled, severe asthma. Astegolimab was safe and well tolerated., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Develop a translational assay of Transient Receptor Potential Ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) activity for use as a preclinical and clinical biomarker., Experimental Approach: Allyl isothiocyanate (AITC), capsaicin or citric acid were applied to ears of wildtype and Trpa1-knock out (Trpa1 KO) rats, and changes in dermal blood flow (DBF) were measured by laser speckle contrast imaging. In humans, the DBF, pain and itch responses to 5-20% AITC applied to the forearm were measured and safety was evaluated. Reproducibility of the DBF, pain and itch responses to topically applied 10% and 15% AITC were assessed at two visits separated by 13-15 days. DBF changes were summarized at 5-minute intervals as areas under the curve (AUC) and maxima. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess arm-arm and period-period reproducibility., Key Results: AITC- and citric acid-induced DBF were significantly reduced in Trpa1 KO rats compared to wildtype (90 ± 2% and 65 ± 11% reduction, respectively), whereas capsaicin response did not differ. In humans, each AITC concentration significantly increased DBF compared to vehicle with the maximal increase occurring 5 minutes post application. Ten percent and 15% AITC were selected as safe and effective stimuli. AUC from 0 to 5 minutes was the most reproducible metric of AITC-induced DBF across arms (ICC = 0.92) and periods (ICC = 0.85). Subject-reported pain was more reproducible than itch across visits (ICC = 0.76 vs 0.17, respectively)., Conclusion and Implications: AITC-induced DBF is a suitable target engagement biomarker of TRPA1 activity for preclinical and clinical studies of TRPA1 antagonists., (© 2020 The British Pharmacological Society.)

Myeloperoxidase (MPO), a leukocyte-derived enzyme mainly secreted by activated neutrophils, is known to be involved in the immune response during bacterial and fungal infection and inflammatory diseases. Nevertheless, the role of MPO in a parasitic disease like malaria is unknown. We hypothesized that MPO contributes to parasite clearance. To address this hypothesis, we used Plasmodium yoelii nonlethal infection in wild-type and MPO-deficient mice as a murine malaria model. We detected high MPO plasma levels in wild-type mice with Plasmodium yoelii infection. Unexpectedly, infected MPO-deficient mice did not show increased parasite loads but were able to clear the infection more rapidly than wild-type mice. Additionally, the presence of neutrophils at the onset of infection seemed not to be essential for the control of the parasitemia. The effect of decreased parasite levels in MPO-deficient mice was absent from animals lacking mature T and B cells, indicating that this effect is most likely dependent on adaptive immune response mechanisms. Indeed, we observed increased gamma interferon and tumor necrosis factor alpha production by T cells in infected MPO-deficient mice. Together, these results suggest that MPO modulates the adaptive immune response during malaria infection, leading to an attenuated parasite clearance., (Copyright © 2016 American Society for Microbiology.)

The present study evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of the 2013/2014 trivalent surface antigen inactivated subunit seasonal influenza virus vaccine Fluvirin® in healthy adults (18 - ≤ 60 years) and elderly (>60 years). The vaccine contained 15 µg haemagglutinin protein from each of influenza A/California/7/2009 (H1N1)pdm09-like strain, A/Victoria/361/2011 (H3N2)-like strain and B/Massachusetts/2/2012-like strain (B/Yamagata) as recommended by the WHO in the 2013/2014 Northern Hemisphere season. Antibody response to each influenza antigen after vaccination was measured prior to vaccination and 21 d after by single radial hemolysis (SRH) assay or hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay in accordance with Guidance CPMP/BWP/214/96. 125 subjects (61 adults and 64 elderly) were enrolled in the study. Pre-vaccination protective antibody levels (SRH area ≥ 25 mm(2)) against A(H1N1), A(H3N2) and the B strain were detected in 17%, 20% and 57% of adults and in 36%, 20% and 55% of elderly, respectively, Post-vaccination, SRH area ≥ 25 mm(2) was detectable in 95%, 82% and 92% in adult and in 80%, 84% and 92% of the elderly subjects for A(H1N1), A(H3N2) and the B strain, respectively. Geometric mean ratio (GMR) was higher in adult subjects (2.62-7.62) than in elderly subjects (2.33-3.42). All three CHMP licensure criteria were met for all strains contained in the vaccine for both age groups. The most frequently reported solicited local and systemic reactions were pain at the injection side, headache and fatigue. In conclusion, the vaccine demonstrated a good immunogenicity and an acceptable safety profile in both adults and elderly.

Background: The present study aimed to evaluate immunogenicity and safety of the 2012/2013 seasonal influenza vaccine (Optaflu(®)) after the World Health Organization recommended two new strains for the composition., Results: Twenty-one days post-vaccination geometric mean titers (GMTs) against A(H1N1), A(H3N2) and the B strain were 528, 935, and 201 for adults and 272, 681, and 101 for elderly subjects, respectively. The proportion of subjects with a HI titer of ≥ 40 against the three strains A(H1N1), A(H3N2) and B was 98%, 100%, and 98% in adults and 100%, 100%, and 85% in elderly subjects, respectively. Optaflu(®) met the CHMP criteria of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CPMP/BWP/214/96). Pre-vaccination titers indicated seroprotection against the A(H1N1), the A(H3N2) and the B strain in 56%, 86%, and 54% of the adults and in 61%, 85%, and 40% of the elderly with highest titers against the A(H3N2) strain. In the safety analysis injection site pain (37%) and myalgia (31%) were the most common local and systemic reactions. No serious adverse events were recorded., Conclusion: The 2012/2013 seasonal influenza vaccine Optaflu(®) showed good immunogenicity and an acceptable safety profile in both adults and elderly., Methods: In this trial, 126 subjects (63 adults ≥18 to ≤60 y, 63 elderly ≥61 y) were vaccinated with a single dose Optaflu(®) containing each of the three virus strains recommended for the 2012/2013 season (A/California/7/2009(H1N1)-like strain, A/Victoria/361/2011(H3N2)-like strain, and B/Wisconsin/1/2010-like strain). Immunogenicity was assessed by hemagglutinin inhibition (HI) and single radial hemolysis (SRH) assays on day 22, the safety profile was investigated throughout the whole study period.