18 results on '"The Munich Agreement"'
Search Results
2. Poetry of Jaroslav Seifert as an opportunity to teach Czechoslovak history at second grade of elementary school
- Author
-
Novotný, Ondřej, Komberec, Filip, and Neumann, Lukáš
- Subjects
stalinistické Československo ,mnichovská dohoda ,výuka dějepisu ,Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia ,protektorát Čechy a Morava ,poetry ,Jaroslav Seifert ,krize 30. let ,osvobození Československa ,The Munich Agreement ,the liberation of Czechoslovakia ,crisis of 30s ,history teaching ,Stalinism in Czechoslovakia ,poezie - Abstract
This diploma thesis Poetry of Jaroslav Seifert as an opportunity to teach Czechoslovak history at second grade of elementary school deals with the use of Seifert's poems issued between years 1937 and 1950 during history lessons in the ninth grade of primary schools. Texts are thoroughly chosen from the collections of poems created during great historical events and milestones (such as 1930s crisis, The Munich Agreement, The Second World War, the liberation of Czechoslovakia and finally Stalinism in 1950s Czechoslovakia). Seifert's poems are perceived as lyric diaries offering a view of given era through historical references while taking their artistic nature into consideration. This diploma thesis is divided into chapters corresponding with above-mentioned historical events. The introduction of each chapter briefly deals with historical background of given eras when Seifert wrote his poems. The actual analysis of the collections of poems is dealt with in corresponding subchapters where, considering aesthetical side of poems, the common features of collections potentially usable for preparations of lessons are identified and categorized. Illustrative propositions of such lessons directly follow the analysis. The proposition of lesson The Munich Agreement is furthermore supported with its reflection...
- Published
- 2023
3. The circumstances of the conclusion and media coverage of the 1973 Prague Treaty between the Czechoslovakia and Germany
- Author
-
JANEČKOVÁ, Šárka
- Subjects
Federal Republic of Germany ,Mnichovská dohoda ,Willy Brandt ,Sovětský svaz ,Ceskoslovenská socialistická republika ,Czechoslovak Socialist Republic ,smlouva ,Agreement ,peace talks ,neue Ostpolitik ,the Soviet Union ,the Munich Agreement ,jednání ,Spolková republika Německo - Abstract
The bachelor thesis deals with the circumstances surrounding the signing of the Prague Treaty in 1973 between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic. It presents the controversial issues that accompanied the negotiations. The fundamental disagreement lay in different interpretations of the validity of the Munich Agreement. The signing of the Prague Treaty made possible a process of détente in international relations that supported West German Chancellor Willy Brandt's concept of neue Ostpolitik. The bachelor's thesis further presents the media image of the conclusion of the Prague Treaty, while there was a significant difference between the periodicals published in Czechoslovakia and in Western Europe, which resulted from the different conception of the role of the media in the political system.
- Published
- 2023
4. Національний технічний університет Укр...
- Author
-
Рамазанов, Ш. Ш.
- Abstract
In the article, the author examined the main reasons that led to the beginning of the Second World War. He emphasized that the most important reasons for the start of the Second World War were the rivalry between the great powers, their aspiration for expansion, European and the world hegemony, the rise of dictatorial, military and totalitarian regimes in Europe and the world, as well as profound differences within the League of Nations. Author insisted that among the key reasons that led to the World War II were: the viability of the Versailles system of international relations; territorial disputes in Europe after the First World War; the continuation of the struggle for the return of the lost territories and spheres of influence by certain states and the protection of other; fight for the preservation of colonial possessions between the leading European countries. The author paid special attention to the extent of responsibility of two international treaties — the Munich Agreement and the Non-Aggression Treaty between the USSR and Germany (the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact). The author analyzed the implications of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and the Munich Agreement for European and World Security and concluded that the Soviet leaders did not judge Hitler’s aggressive intentions correctly. Similarly England and France at the time of signing the Munich Agreement considered the policy of its own guarantees given to small countries of Eastern and Central Europe as a factor that would have prevented German aggression, and believed in the subordination of Hitler to the authority of the international community. All these circumstances, which arose in the late 1930’s, opened the way for Hitler to resolve the Second World War, which led to a world tragedy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. The policy of the Czechoslovak government aimed at neutralizing the German threat during 1935 - 1938 with a focus on the situation in Slovakia.
- Author
-
Olejník, Milan
- Subjects
WORLD War I ,INTERNATIONAL relations ,TOTALITARIANISM - Abstract
The second half of 1930s was a period of dramatic political changes in Europe. The stability established by peace agreements concluded after World War I underwent gradual but continual erosion. The main reason for the transforming political landscape was the political developments in Germany which resulted in the collapse of the democratic parliamentary system. In the spring of 1933 The Nazi Party assumed power in Germany and over the span of a few years succeeded in remaking Germany into a totalitarian state. The German dictator Adolf Hitler openly declared his intention to destroy the system of peace treaties, which had formed the basis of peaceful relations amongst states in Europe after World War I. Keeping to this declaration, he openly pursued a provocative policy of step-by-step destruction of the Versailles Treaty. In the context of Hitler´s political aims, the growing economic and military power of Germany constituted a clear threat to Central European states. The Czechoslovak government concluded that it had to apply all possible means to reinforce the defense ability of the state, and consequently a policy of rapid fortification on the border with Germany was initiated. Military maneuvers aimed at enhancing the defense capabilities of the Czechoslovak Army were enacted throughout Czechoslovakia (CSR). State propaganda on the radio and in the press portrayed the Czechoslovak Republic as a state capable of repelling any invasion and re-assuring the population. However, despite such propaganda, it was continually emphasized that Czechoslovakia could only resist Germany with the added protection of its allies France and the Soviet Union. In 1938 Hitler began a policy of territorial expansion under the pretense of Germany´s right to unify all Germans in one state. The primary targets of this strategy were Austria and Czechoslovakia. He was helped in his intention by a sizeable segment of Nazi sympathizers in Austria and the large minority of Sudeten Germans in Czechoslovakia. In regards to Austria, through a mixture of subterfuge, threats and ruthless pressure, Hitler succeeded. On March 13th 1938 the German army occupied Austria without any resistance. It was clear that France and Great Britain, who were principal guarantors of the Versailles Treaty, were not able to mount any meaningful resistance. France, which was plagued by a prolonged political crisis, was on the day of German invasion without government. Great Britain expressed solely a verbal protest. It became clear that there was no power in Europe capable of effectively resisting Germany. Emboldened by the generally positive reaction of the German public, Hitler set his next goal - to "liberate" Sudeten Germans from the Czechoslovak "yoke". Despite this meaning a fundamental violation of Czechoslovak integrity and rendering Czechoslovakia militarily exposed to Germany, the German dictator threatened military action if his demands were not met. The Czechoslovak government desperately tried to find a solution. Sudeten Germans were offered minority rights, and a form of autonomy, named the National Statute, was prepared. However, this was flatly refused by representatives of Sudeten Germans led by Konrad Henlein. It was clear that the leadership of Sudeten Germans was not interested in any form of accommodation with the Czechoslovak government and was an obedient tool of Hitler. The Czechoslovaks hoped that the Western powers (namely France, who had a defense treaty with the CSR and had on numerous occasions professed a determination to come to Czechoslovak defense in case of German aggression) would fulfill its obligation. Another ally was the Soviet Union, but according to an agreement the Soviet Army would engage in conflict only in the case of France entering military operations with Germany. France and Great Britain instead pressurized the Czechoslovak President Edvard Beneš to peacefully accommodate Hitler. However, the situation in the Sudetenland worsened after Hitler's speech at the Nazi Party Congress on September 11th 1938. A number of clashes occurred in the Sudetenland, but Czechoslovak security forces successfully suppressed the revolt. It was becoming clear that to reach accommodation by peaceful means was becoming increasingly unlikely. The British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, with the aim of averting war with Germany, in an unprecedented move offered to travel to Germany and meet Hitler. During the meeting on September 15th Hitler declared that if Czechoslovakia would agree with the German annexation of Sudeten territory, he was willing to abstain from an invasion, to which Chamberlain agreed. France and Great Britain then began to coerce the Czechoslovak government into accepting the annexation of Sudetenland by Germany. Aware that in the case of refusal Czechoslovakia would face German aggression alone, the Czechoslovak government accepted the ultimatum. However, the next meeting between Chamberlain and Hitler at Bad Godesberg ended in disarray as a result of Hitler´s increased demands. Chamberlain refused to accept the new demands and only agreed to let the Czechoslovak government know about them. The Czechoslovak representatives rejected Hitler´s latest demands as unacceptable. On September 24th the Czechoslovak government declared mobilization, with war appearing inevitable. But again Chamberlain, in an attempt to find accommodation with Hitler, arranged a conference with the French Prime Minister Édouard Daladier, the Italian leader Mussolini and Hitler. Despite the fact that the fate of Czechoslovakia was about to be decided, no representative of the Czechoslovak Republic was invited. The signatories of the conference accepted Germany's demands. The outcome of the conference, The Munich Agreement, resulted in the end of Czechoslovakia as a sovereign, democratic state. The loss of the heavily fortified Western frontier fatally weakened the CSR and opened the way to German further expansion. The hopes of the British and French political leaders by abandoning the CSR to save peace in Europe were unrealistic. On the contrary, the reluctance of Western democracies to stand up to Hitler encouraged Nazi Germany to initiate further aggression. This paper maps the steps taken by the Czechoslovak government to implement measures aimed at protecting the Republic against German aggression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
6. ЗОВНІШНЯ ПОЛІТИКА РАДЯНСЬКОГО СОЮЗУ У МІ...
- Author
-
Рамазанов, Ш. Ш.
- Abstract
The article examines the foreign policy of the Soviet Union before World War II. The author on the basis of current research examines the attempts of the Soviet leadership to create the anti-Hitler coalition in Europe. But the policy of some European countries after the signing of the Munich agreement dramatically altered the intention of Soviet diplomacy. Analyzing the actions of the Soviet leadership, the author explains the turn of Soviet diplomacy in the direction of cooperation with Germany. Pro-German orientation of the Soviet Union is due to the cynical attitude of Stalin and his associates to the international law, the desire to increase their territory at the expense of neighboring states. The signing of the Non-Aggression Treaty between the USSR and Germany in 1939 subsequently gave Stalin the opportunity to attach a number of territories of neighboring countries: Poland, Finland, Romania and others. The author notes that the pro-German orientation in foreign policy of the Soviet Union was in part provoked distrust of Britain and France. But the Soviet leadership on the eve of the Second World War did not seek to cooperate with the European states. It is concluded that among modern historians, there is no unambiguous assessment of the actions of both the Soviet Union and European countries on the establishment of the anti-Hitler coalition. The main reason lies in the fact that some historians have tried to justify the actions of Stalin's leadership that the alliance with Germany in 1939 was dictated by the objective circumstances. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. BRITSKÁ DIPLOMACIE, ČESKOSLOVENSKÁ OTÁZKA A KONEC MEZIVÁLEČNÉHO SYSTÉMU SMLUV O OCHRANÉ MENŠIN V LETECH 1938-1945.
- Author
-
KUKLÍK, JAN
- Abstract
The paper deals with the relationship of the British Diplomacy to the minority issues between 1938 and 1945 on the background of the so-called Czechoslovak Issue. Initially in Munich on 30th September 1938, Britain decided, having considered all wider implications of its appeasement policy, to support the solution of the minority issue subsisting in the forced surrendering of a part of the Czechoslovak territory settled primarily by the German minority for the benefit of Nazi Germany. Britain considered rather ineffective and inapplicable the system of minority treaties made under the auspices of the League of Nations. During WWII, supporting the restoration of Czechoslovakia within the frontiers of its pre-war territory, Britain was trying to find an alternative; since July 1942 the alternative was seen in the relocation of members of German minorities from Czechoslovakia, Poland (due to its Western borders) and from other countries in the Middle and Eastern Europe to Germany. This British approach was based upon several reasons besides their belief that the relocation of German population would strengthen the position of the respective states in Middle Europe, which could then cooperate in a federal union and effectively face the threat coming from the USSR as well as potentially from Germany in the future. In addition, the relocation would eliminate a possibility that German minorities could again become a threat to European peace. Another reason was the fact that, having analysed the whole problem, the British Foreign Office concluded that no "revival" of the system of minority treaties would be feasible after WWII. This was not only because the whole system failed during the War but also because Czechoslovakia, Poland and the USSR were strictly against its re-installation. On the other hand, the issue of the protection of minorities could not be eliminated; it was included in debates over the new conception of basic human rights within the preparation of a new international organization - the UNO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
8. ПОЛИТИКА «УМИРОТВОРЕНИЯ» НАЦИЗМА КАК ФАКТОР РАЗВЯЗЫВАНИЯ ВТОРОЙ МИРОВОЙ ВОЙНЫ (К 80-ЛЕТИЮ НАЧАЛА ВТОРОЙ МИРОВОЙ ВОЙНЫ)
- Author
-
Bocharnikov, I.
- Subjects
нацистская Германия ,Nazi Germany ,the non-aggression Pact ,militarization ,Версальский договор ,the policy of "appeasement" ,World war II ,военно-политическая обстановка ,пакт о ненападении ,Вторая мировая война ,the League of Nations ,Лига наций ,милитаризация ,the military-political situation ,политика «умиротворения» ,Мюнхенский сговор ,the prewar period ,the Munich agreement ,предвоенный период ,the Treaty of Versailles - Abstract
The article analyzes the events of European and world politics of the prewar period from the moment of coming to power in Germany in 1933 by the Nazi leadership until the outbreak of the World war II on September 1, 1939. The main causes of the escalation of tension in Europe are identified, including the imposition on Germany of the enslaving and humiliating conditions of the Treaty of Versailles, which provoked the coming to power of representatives of rightwing extremist Nazi political structures. The main directions of the policy of appeasement of Nazi Germany implemented by the leadership of Great Britain and France in order to initiate the German attack on the Soviet Union are revealed. The policy of Germanys concessions by Poland and a number of other Eastern and Central European States in the pre war period, their participation in German foreign policy expansionist actions, such as the Anschluss of Austria and the dismemberment of Czechoslovakia, which were the prelude to the Second world war, is evaluated. The author substantiates the failure of attempts to shift the responsibility for the outbreak of the World war II to the Soviet Union and its political leadership., В статье анализируются события европейской и мировой политики предвоенного периода с момента прихода к власти в Германии в 1933 году нацистского руководства до развязывания Второй мировой войны 1 сентября 1939 года. Определяются основные причины эскалации напряженности в Европе, в том числе навязывание Германии кабальных и унизительных условий Версальского договора, спровоцировавших приход к власти представителей маргинальных политических сил, основными пунктами политической программы которых являлись: денонсация положений Версальского договора, возрождение военной мощи Германии и расширение ее жизненного пространства . Раскрываются основные направления политики умиротворения нацистской Германии, реализуемой руководством Великобритании и Франции с целью инициирования нападения Германии на Советский Союз. Оценивается политика уступок Германии со стороны Польши и ряда других восточно и центральноевропейских государств в предвоенный период, их участие во внешнеполитических экспансионистских акциях Германии, таких как аншлюс Австрии и расчленение Чехословакии, явившихся прелюдией Второй мировой войны. Обосновывается несостоятельность попыток переложить ответственность за развязывание Второй мировой войны на Советский Союз и его политическое руководство., №9(129) (2019)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. УРОКИ ІСТОРІЇ: ПРО ПРИЧИНИ ПОЧАТКУ ДРУГОЇ СВІТОВОЇ ВІЙНИ
- Author
-
Ramazanov, Sh.
- Subjects
303.446.4.341.31 ,диктаторський ,Версальська система ,пакт Молотова-Ріббентропа ,the Munich Agreement ,lcsh:History (General) and history of Europe ,авторитарний режим ,Мюнхенська угода ,тоталітарний режим ,Versailles System ,мюнхенська угода ,Друга світова війна ,авторитарний ,Second World War ,пакт молотова-ріббентропа ,lcsh:D ,версальська система ,диктаторський режим ,Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact ,totalitarian regimes ,друга світова війна - Abstract
У статті аналізуються основні причини Другої світової війни. Найважливішими з них автор називає суперництво великих держав між собою, їх прагнення до експансії, до європейської та світової гегемонії, а також глибокі розбіжності в Лізі Націй. Ключовими факторами, що спричинили розв’язання Другої світової війни, на думку автора, стали нежиттєздатність створеної за результатами Першої світової війни Версальської системи міжнародних відносин, територіальні суперечки, що виникли в Європі після Першої світової війни. Особливу увагу автор приділяє ролі двох міжнародних документів - Мюнхенської угоди і Договору про ненапад між СРСР і Німеччиною за початок Другої світової війни, підкреслюючи, що їх слід розглядати не ізольовано, а в контексті того, що відбувалося в той час на європейському континенті. In the article, the author examined the main reasons that led to the beginning of the Second World War. He emphasized that the most important reasons for the start of the Second World War were the rivalry between the great powers, their aspiration for expansion, European and the world hegemony, the rise of dictatorial, military and totalitarian regimes in Europe and the world, as well as profound differences within the League of Nations. Author insisted that among the key reasons that led to the World War II were: the viability of the Versailles system of international relations; territorial disputes in Europe after the First World War; the continuation of the struggle for the return of the lost territories and spheres of influence by certain states and the protection of other; fight for the preservation of colonial possessions between the leading European countries. The author paid special attention to the extent of responsibility of two international treaties — the Munich Agreement and the Non-Aggression Treaty between the USSR and Germany (the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact). The author analyzed the implications of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and the Munich Agreement for European and World Security and concluded that the Soviet leaders did not judge Hitler’s aggressive intentions correctly. Similarly England and France at the time of signing the Munich Agreement considered the policy of its own guarantees given to small countries of Eastern and Central Europe as a factor that would have prevented German aggression, and believed in the subordination of Hitler to the authority of the international community. All these circumstances, which arose in the late 1930’s, opened the way for Hitler to resolve the Second World War, which led to a world tragedy.
- Published
- 2019
10. The Munich agreement and its reflection in the press/ The reflection of the Munich agreement in the press
- Author
-
Legátová, Alžběta, Končelík, Jakub, and Cebe, Jan
- Subjects
mnichovská dohoda ,the Munich myth ,Jan Tesař ,Munich ,Mnichov ,The Munich complex ,The Munich Agreement ,mnichovský mýtus ,mnichovský komplex - Abstract
The Munich agreement signed on the 29th of September 1938 has always been giving rise to strong emotions in Czech society. This event, frequently described as "about us, without us", is a synonym for humiliation, injustice and a symbol of betrayal for many. The historian Jan Tesař holds a non-traditional point of view on this matter. He opposes this established interpretation and sees it as a source of origin of the so-called Munich Complex. The proposed diploma thesis focuses on this phenomenon, which is examined in printed media. Firstly, it provides a brief historical context and introduces an overview of different interpretations of Munich events within Czech historiography as well as describes the arguments of Tesař himself. Furthermore, the Munich complex is conceptualized and the resulting concept includes variables necessary for the research part of the thesis. This section consists of qualitative and quantitative analysis of the content of selected representative media samples. Among examined aspects are arguments used in the press, patterns of interpretation and attributed meanings. The time scope for analysis ranges from 1948 to 2018. Finally, the examination of the presence of aforementioned elements in selected samples and evolution of media bias throughout the time provides knowledge...
- Published
- 2019
11. The Foreign Policy of the Soviet Union in the Interwar Period (1930s — Early 1940s)
- Author
-
Ramazanov, Sh.
- Subjects
міжнародні відносини ,foreign policy ,the Munich Agreement ,lcsh:History (General) and history of Europe ,lcsh:D ,a pact of non-aggression ,пакт про ненапад ,international relations ,Мюнхенська угода ,зовнішня політика ,372.51«1930/1940» [94] - Abstract
У статті розглядається зовнішня політика Радянського Союзу напередодні Другої світової війни. Автор на основі сучасних досліджень аналізує спроби радянського керівництва створити антигітлерівську коаліцію в Європі. The article examines the foreign policy of the Soviet Union before World War II. The author on the basis of current research examines the attempts of the Soviet leadership to create the anti-Hitler coalition in Europe. But the policy of some European countries after the signing of the Munich agreement dramatically altered the intention of Soviet diplomacy. Analyzing the actions of the Soviet leadership, the author explains the turn of Soviet diplomacy in the direction of cooperation with Germany. Pro-German orientation of the Soviet Union is due to the cynical attitude of Stalin and his associates to the international law, the desire to increase their territory at the expense of neighboring states. The signing of the Non-Aggression Treaty between the USSR and Germany in 1939 subsequently gave Stalin the opportunity to attach a number of territories of neighboring countries: Poland, Finland, Romania and others. The author notes that the pro-German orientation in foreign policy of the Soviet Union was in part provoked distrust of Britain and France. But the Soviet leadership on the eve of the Second World War did not seek to cooperate with the European states. It is concluded that among modern historians, there is no unambiguous assessment of the actions of both the Soviet Union and European countries on the establishment of the anti-Hitler coalition. The main reason lies in the fact that some historians have tried to justify the actions of Stalin’s leadership that the alliance with Germany in 1939 was dictated by the objective circumstances.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Regional press in region of Liberec in 1938 on example of north bohemian daily
- Author
-
Reindlová, Nikola, Köpplová, Barbara, and Krejcar, Robert
- Subjects
German ,mnichovská dohoda ,the Sudetenland ,Němci ,Liberec ,Czech ,Nort-Bohemian Daily ,Sudety ,czech regional press ,Češi ,the Munich Agreement ,Severočeský deník ,český regionální tisk - Abstract
The main aim of my diploma thesis is to capture the social atmosphere on the pages of periodicals in the Liberec region over the last few months before the secession of the Sudetenland from Czechoslovakia in the Munich Agreement. It was a predominantly German populated region and I wonder how local Czech minority recognize tense period in 1938. For this reason I chose the only Czech written newspapers in Liberec at this period - North-Bohemian Daily. Start of the work is devoted to a brief recapitulation of the historical development of Liberec. And next charter deals with Czech-German relations because this topic is not only a question of the First Republic but it is a coexistence lasting few centuries and we could classify the events of 1938 in the correct context. In the next part I have devoted Nort-Bohemian Daily, its publishers, printers, graphic form, editorial and content characteristics. This is followed by a quantitative content analysis in the last stage of existence of newspapers, ie from January to October 1938. I was interested what topics editorial gave space, who created the texts as they were long and to which columns they were sorted. I also examined by genres newspaper formed and whether journalists engaged in regional, national or international events . At the conclusion chapter...
- Published
- 2014
13. Reflexe politických událostí v šlechtických denících konce 30. let 20. století
- Author
-
Vydra, Zbyněk, Jelínková, Dita, Němcová, Kateřina, Vydra, Zbyněk, Jelínková, Dita, and Němcová, Kateřina
- Abstract
Práce se zabývá reflexí politických událostí v šlechtických denících konce 30. let 20. století. Jedná se o události v Evropě, které jsou spojené s dobou Adolfa Hitlera. Práce je zaměřená na německou šlechtickou rodinu Laudonů z Bystřice pod Hostýnem, konkrétně na osobu Ernsta Gideona Laudona. Práce vychází z deníkových zápisků Ernsta Gideona Laudona., The work is focused on reflection political events at the end of thirties years of 20th century. The work is focused on the family of Laudon, who lived in the era of the First Republic, Second Republic and Protectorate Bohemia and Moravia. The work is based on the correspondence and diaries of Ernst Gideon Laudon., Ústav historických věd, 1. Představení tématu DP: prameny, koncepce, metody i práce v kontextu gender a women´s history.2. Seznámení uchazečky s oběma posudky. Otázky směrovaly k metodice práce s egodokumenty a sekundární literatuře týkající se historického kontextu.3. Reakce diplomantky na posudky. 4. Závěrečná zpráva.
- Published
- 2014
14. The Munich Agreement and United States of America
- Author
-
Lukeš, Jakub, Johnson, Zdenka, and Soukup, Jaromír
- Subjects
Czechoslovak crisis of 1938 ,Mnichovská dohoda ,Franklin D. Roosevelt ,izolacionismus ,Spojené státy americké ,diplomatické vztahy, 1936-1938/1939 ,Československá krize roku 1938 ,Československo ,Czechoslovakia and USA ,The Munich Agreement ,diplomatic relations 1936-1938/1939 ,isolationism - Abstract
In my diploma thesis, I provide an analysis of the Munich Agreement and the Czechoslovak crisis from the perspective of the United States of America. My aim is to create comprehensive picture of bilateral relations between Czechoslovakia and the United States before and after the signing of the Munich Agreement. Thesis focuses on the diplomatic and economic relations between Czechoslovakia and United States in the period 1936 -- 1938/1939. The introductory part of the thesis is devoted to the phenomenon of isolationism and its influence in shaping the U.S. foreign policy. The main point of the analysis is the attitude of the American public to the Czechoslovak crisis and the Munich Agreement itself. The main hypothesis consists in the assertion that the United States played a major role in the Czechoslovak crisis that preceeded the signing of the Munich Agreement. I am seeking answers to these questions: How did the American public perceived the Czechoslovak crisis? What was the reaction of the U.S. government to the Czechoslovak crisis and the subsequent the Munich Agreement? How did president F. D. Roosevelt perceived the Czechoslovak crisis? In order to find answers to my questions I am using the issued and unissued sources, specialized literature and especially the contemporary press. The thesis has proved that the United States took part in the events that preceded the signing of the Munich Agreement.
- Published
- 2012
15. Corruption of Democratic System of ‚2nd Republic' and Radicalization of Political Conditions Presented on Case of National Unity Party and National Labour Party
- Author
-
Jetmar, Jakub, Kocian, Jiří, and Rak, Jiří
- Subjects
II. Česko-Slovenská republika ,Mnichovská dohoda ,The National Unity Party ,international relations ,Autokracie ,Autocracy ,Mezinárodní vztahy ,The National Labour Party ,Anti-Semitism ,Antisemitismus ,Národní strana práce ,The Munich Agreement ,2nd Czech-Slovak Republic ,Federalizace ,Strana národní jednoty ,Federalization - Abstract
The thesis "Corruption of Democratic System of ‚2nd Republic' and Radicalization of Political Conditions Presented on Case of National Unity Party and National Labour Party" deals mainly with deformation of the parliamentary system, with growth of anti-Semitism, and generally even with an aimed destruction of democracy which had accompanied development of Czech political parties in so called Czech-Slovakia of that period. The introduction chapters are focusing to outline the political situation in the period having been succeeded The Munich Agreement. The following parts are focused on the changes that afflicted not only the interior structure of above mentioned political parties but led also to a decline or even to an entire denial of former ideas, inherent to the previous period of ‚1st Republic', of which these parties had been integral elements.Based on interpretation of both the contemporary and present day publications and periodicals, this thesis aims to be one of tributes revealing the period of ‚2nd Republic',which has not been frequently treated by Czech historiography. This thesis makes an effort to reply questions of these sorts, e.g.: Has that period influenced the historical memory of Czech people? Was that régime a product of a pressure of totalitarian great power, with regard to the...
- Published
- 2011
16. The Czechoslovak Church in the period of protectorate 1939-1945
- Author
-
Hlavsa, Jan, Lášek, Jan Blahoslav, and Veverková, Kamila
- Subjects
Deutsche Christen ,Mnichovská dohoda ,clergyfascism ,konfese ,Annex ,klerofašistický ,confession ,Anektace ,antisemitismus ,anti-Semitism ,The Munich Agreement ,protectorate ,protektorát - Published
- 2011
17. 'The homeland of the country emigrate and back again...' The migration from the occupied borderland in the time of Second Republic
- Author
-
Benda, Jan, Gebhart, Jan, Kvaček, Robert, and Borák, Mečislav
- Subjects
druhá republika ,mnichovská dohoda ,the Second Republic (1938-1939) ,emigrace ,emigration ,the Munich Agreement ,uprchlíci ,refugees - Abstract
Jan Benda "The homeland of the country emigrate and back again…" The Migration from the occupied borderland in the time of Second Republic (1938-1939) Supervisor:PhDr. Jan Gebhart, CSc. DSc. Abstract The thesis deals with raw yet comprehensively, covering theme: migration from the border area of Czechoslovakia, which was ceded to Germany as a result of the decision in Munich and to Poland on the basis of Polish ultimatum. Introductory chapters are trying to find answers to questions concerning the origins and the beginning of the refugee problem, which could be sought in the growth of antisemitism in the spring of 1938. In the autumm, after a coup attempt Henlein's people left border in addition to the German anti-fascists, Jews and Czechs. Already during the phased resigning border migration flows greatly abounded, which were both due to the increase in negative behavior and conduct the "Henlein's" people (some of members of Henlein's Party-SdP) against German anti-fascists, Jews and Czechs, as well as specific measures Nazi regime restricting the living conditions of the population of the occupied territories. Many of these people were victims of violence and sometimes expulsion. The structure of the migrant population includes all employee categories, ie only poses a "withdrawal" of state employees to...
- Published
- 2011
18. The role of Munich agreement in Czechoslovakia in the period 1945 to 1948
- Author
-
Kučerová, Alice, Stellner, František, and Soběhart, Radek
- Subjects
collective memory ,Československo 1945 až 1948 ,Mnichovská smlouva ,the Munich agreement ,Czechoslovakia 1945 to 1948 ,Kolektivní paměť - Abstract
This thesis analyzes the consequences of the Munich Agreement for Czechoslovakia in the period 1945 to 1948 taking into account the years 1938 to 1944. In the introductory theoretical chapter is analyzed collective and individual memory and created construction of collective identity. In the subsequent chapters with the recollection and memory is then presented Munich impact on society created by the press as well as by political leaders headed by President Benes. Till the end of 1945, in the spirit of "Atonement" Munich, were performed the majority of changes essential especially for the state and society and they are the subject of investigation based on press, speeches and memoirs.
- Published
- 2010
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.