Search

Objective: The study objective was to determine what proportion of asymptomatic patients had resectable lung cancer detected through lung cancer screening versus incidentally. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent resection for lung cancer between January 2015 and December 2020. We then assessed whether asymptomatic patients with incidentally found lung cancers were eligible for lung cancer screening using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, United States Preventive Services Task Force, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, American College of Chest Physicians, American Cancer Society, and American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines. Results: Of 539 patients who underwent resection for primary lung cancer, 437 (81%) were asymptomatic and 355 (66%) of these patients had lung cancer found discovered incidentally. Of the 355 patients with incidentally detected lung cancer, 10 were excluded for insufficient data. Of the remaining 345 patients, 110 (32%) would have been eligible for screening using National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, 65 (19%) using 2021 United States Preventive Services Task Force guidelines, 53 (15%) using 2013 United States Preventive Services Task Force guidelines, 64 (19%) using 2022 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services guidelines, 52 (15%) using 2015 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services/American College of Chest Physicians guidelines, and 45 (13%) using American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines. Of the 280 patients who were screen ineligible by 2021 United States Preventive Services Task Force criteria, 143 patients (51%) never smoked, 112 patients (40%) quit smoking more than 15 years ago, 89 patients (32%) did not smoke at least 20 pack-years, and 44 patients (16%) were ineligible due to age. Conclusions: The majority of asymptomatic patients with resectable lung cancers had lung cancer identified incidentally and not through lung cancer screening. Most of these patients were not eligible for screening under current guidelines. This study suggests a need for improved lung cancer screening implementation and further investigation in the identification and assessment of risk factors for lung cancer.

Objective: The objective was to compare overall survival (OS) between lobectomy and segmentectomy for patients with non–small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) > 2 but ≤4 cm. Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried to identify treatment-naïve patients with NSCLC tumors >2 but ≤4 cm. Eligible patients were diagnosed with pT1 or T2 N0 M0 disease, underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy, and received no adjuvant therapy. OS was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox proportional-hazards model was used to identify prognostic factors for death. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize the effects of potential confounders. Results: Included were 32,792 patients: lobectomy (n = 31,353) and segmentectomy (n = 1439). Five-year OS was improved following lobectomy over segmentectomy for patients with >2 but ≤4 cm NSCLCs (62.3% vs 52.6%; P 2 but ≤3 cm (64.9% vs 54.3%; P 3 but ≤4 cm (56.9% vs 47.6%; P = .0003). In patients with a Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index of 0, 5-year OS was greater following lobectomy for >2 but ≤4 cm tumors (67.1% vs 62.1%; P = .03). Further stratification demonstrated improved 5-year OS following lobectomy for patients with Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index of 0 and > 3 but ≤4 cm tumors (61.8% vs 54.6%; P = .02). Segmentectomy was prognostic for increased risk of death in the year 1 through 5 postoperative period (hazard ratio, 1.35; P 2 but ≤4 cm when feasible.