Search

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory disease that may involve any cutaneous site; involvement of the genital area may greatly impair patients' quality of life but, as the inspection of genitals is not usually conducted during the routine physical examination of patients with AD, the genital presentation of AD is frequently neglected and under-reported. We decided to evaluate the incidence of genital AD in patients with moderate-severe AD and the relative response to anti-interleukin (IL)-4/IL-13 dupilumab. In our study, a high incidence of genital AD emerged but the use of dupilumab allowed a generalized improvement.

Background Recent studies highlight that high levels of cytokines may precede the onset of many systemic autoimmune disorders and may also be related to chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) activity. Methods Eight patients with CSU candidate to omalizumab therapy were enrolled. Four healthy controls were included with the purpose of comparing baseline cytokine levels. We evaluated serum levels of IFN-γ, IL-2, 4, 6, 8, and 10, TNF-α, and GM-CSF. For the patient group, venous blood samples were drawn at T0, T1 (1 week after first drug administration), T2 (after 3 months), T3 (after 6 months), and in case of relapse. Cytokine levels were measured using the human cytokines 8-plex kit. Disease activity and effect of therapy were calculated by means of Urticaria Activity Score 7. Results Higher levels of IL-6 and IFN-γ were found in patients with CSU compared to those observed in the control group. Moreover, a common trend between these cytokines and the clinical history of disease could be hypothesized, with a decrease in levels of IFN-γ and IL-6 following remission of CSU with omalizumab treatment. Levels of other tested cytokines were similar between patients and healthy subjects. Conclusion IFN-γ and IL-6 are proinflammatory cytokines that are strongly related to autoimmunity. Despite being limited by the small sample size, our data offer new insight into a better understanding of the pathogenesis of CSU and support the need for further investigations.

Dupilumab-related head and neck dermatitis is an increasingly reported clinical manifestation occurring in 4-10% of patients on dupilumab that was apparently not reported in clinical trials. Out of 62 adult patients treated with dupilumab for atopic dermatitis in the authors' center, four cases (6%) of head and neck dermatitis were observed, for which a skin biopsy was obtained. Onset occurred between 8 and 24 weeks after initiation of dupilumab, and the reaction resolved after 8-12 weeks. Histopathology and immunohistochemical findings support the authors' hypothesis that facial redness may be a toxic effect induced by dupilumab, although its pathogenesis still requires further investigation.Plain language summary Dupilumab is an advanced treatment for atopic dermatitis. The new appearance of a peculiar head and neck dermatitis may be observed in as many as 4–10% of subjects receiving this drug, though it was not reported in the course of the clinical trials that led to the approval of dupilumab. Out of 62 adults treated with dupilumab for atopic dermatitis in the authors' Dermatology Clinic, four subjects (6%) were observed to have head and neck dermatitis. The condition appeared between 8 and 24 weeks after initiation of dupilumab and lasted 8–12 weeks. The four subjects gave permission to perform a skin biopsy. Microscopic analysis of their samples suggested that this peculiar facial redness may be a drug-induced reaction associated with dupilumab, although its causes and mechanisms still require understanding.

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a rare immune-mediated vasculitis associated with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs). Having systemic and possibly severe involvement, a prompt recognition of its clinical features is crucial to achieve favorable patient outcomes. Although cutaneous manifestations represent key elements, these still remain poorly characterized. We report a case of ANCA-positive EGPA presenting with palpable purpura, livedo reticularis, and pemphigoid-like lesions that was successfully treated with glucocorticoid therapy and rituximab. This report portrays the evolution of cutaneous lesions in ANCA-positive EGPA and demonstrates how dermatologic signs may represent indicators of active disease, allowing for timely diagnosis and for the monitoring of disease activity during treatment.

The current global healthcare response to the COVID-19 pandemic is focused on a widespread vaccination campaign, which started with the authorization of Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in December 2020. Local injection site reactions have been described during the clinical trials of both the abovementioned mRNA vaccines; skin rashes were additionally reported in the trial of Moderna. Despite this, cutaneous adverse reactions to the vaccines and their timing remain to date poorly characterized (1,2).

After coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused a global pandemic, vaccines were rapidly developed to control the spread of the virus. Although they were effective in most of the cases at protecting people from becoming seriously ill and being hospitalized, they showed side effects, too. Among other adverse vaccine reactions, cutaneous eruptions following SARS-CoV-2 have been described in the literature, but they are not well-characterized yet. We described the morphology and timing of the spectrum of cutaneous reactions following most of the COVID-19 vaccines available in Italy, which were observed in outpatients referred to our non-invasive diagnostic clinic. Most of these reactions appeared after the second or third COVID-19 vaccine dose (most of them after mRNA COVID-19 vaccines). Our data support that cutaneous reactions to COVID-19 vaccination are generally self-limited; in addition, history of allergic reaction to a specific food, medicine or vaccine should not discourage vaccination in the general population, although patients with immune dysregulation should be accurately selected and monitored. Further research is necessary to better assess the true prevalence and preventive measures of skin reactions to COVID-19 vaccination.

Background: Few and small studies have described the management of immunomodulant/immunosuppressive therapies or phototherapy in atopic dermatitis (AD) patients during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: A national registry, named DA-COVID-19 and involving 35 Italian dermatology units, was established in order to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the management of adult AD patients treated with systemic immunomodulant/immunosuppressive medications or phototherapy. Demographic and clinical data were obtained at different timepoints by teledermatology during COVID-19 pandemic, when regular visits were not allowed due to sanitary restrictions. Disease severity was assessed by both physician- and patient-reported assessment scores evaluating itch intensity, sleep disturbances, and AD severity. Results: A total of 1831 patients were included, with 1580/1831 (86.3%) continuing therapy during pandemic. Most patients were treated with dupilumab (86.1%, 1576/1831) that was interrupted in only 9.9% (156/1576) of cases, while systemic immunosuppressive compounds were more frequently withdrawn. Treatment interruption was due to decision of the patient, general practitioner or dermatologist in 39.9% (114/286), 5.6% (16/286), and 30.1% (86/286) of cases, respectively. Fear of increased susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection (24.8%, 71/286) was one of the main causes of interruption. Sixteen patients (0.9%) resulted positive to SARS-CoV-2 infection, 3 of them (0.2%) were hospitalized but no cases of COVID-related death occurred. Conclusions: Most AD patients continued systemic treatments during COVID pandemicand lockdown period, without high impact on disease control, particularly dupilumab-treatedpatients.

BACKGROUND: Chronic spontaneous urticaria might affect elderly patients, causing a serious impairment of their quality of life. The therapeutic management of the elderly patient is challenging; in fact, the first-line recommended therapy for symptom control are antihistamines, that may have interactions or increased risk of side effects in patients with comorbidities and poly-pharmacological regimen. Omalizumab is the first biological drug approved for chronic spontaneous urticaria resistant to antihistamines. Real-life data focusing on patients > 65 years old (yoa) treated with omalizumab are rare. METHODS: In our retrospective study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of this biologic therapy in patients over 65yoa. We performed Urticaria Activity Score-7 (UAS-7) in order to evaluate the efficacy of omalizumab and the time of remission. We collected any adverse event related to the treatment. Moreover, we investigated the presence of comorbidities and their impact on the efficacy of omalizumab. RESULTS: 63 patients, with a mean age of 72.3 ± 5.6 years, range: 65-89) were enrolled. Of 63 subjects, 23 (36.5%) had an "early complete response" profile, which means the achievement of a UAS7 score of "0" within the first 7 days of therapy. The most frequent comorbidity was hypertension, which affected 26/63 (41.3%) patients; no adverse events were reported. No significant correlations were found between treatment effectiveness and comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: omalizumab is a safe and effective therapy also in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

It is Leonard F. Hoenig, MD Data on the tolerability and response to biologic therapies for type 2 immune disorders in the context of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are currently lacking. Our survey aimed at assessing the adherence of patients to dupilumab therapy and the risk of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. A total of 80 patients with atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab completed a web-based survey. Of the 80 patients, 7 discontinued dupilumab owing to concerns and difficulties related to COVID-19. Our sample was highly susceptible to viral infection owing to the frequency of risk factors including living in high SARS-CoV-2 burden areas, such as in Northern Italy; having comorbidities, such as asthma, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease; and being of advanced age. Older patients in our sample are particularly exposed to the risk of COVID-19–related cytokine storm, triggered by excessive interleukin-4 production and type 2 immune response. One patient contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection without the progression of COVID-19 despite continuing scheduled dupilumab treatment. Because evidence on the appropriate management of biologic therapy in the setting of COVID-19 is lacking, the collection of clinical data from patients in treatment with dupilumab is a valuable addition to current clinical practice. Our survey provides a contribution to the understanding of the tolerability and response to dupilumab during COVID-19 and suggests a feasible and effective approach to patients being treated with biologics even when social distancing is required.

Dupilumab showed significant improvement of adolescent atopic dermatitis (AD) signs and symptoms in clinical trials, with a good safety profile. Herein we report the real-word effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in adolescents with moderate to severe AD from January to October 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. All patients had a diagnosis of AD for a mean [SD] 12.8 [3.1] years. Baseline demographics, AD characteristics (EASI, cDLQI, NRS itch score, NRS sleep loss score) at baseline and week 16, and safety data were collected. Nineteen patients (52.6% men; mean [SD] age, 15.6 [1.4] years [range, 13-17 years]) were included in the analysis. All patients reached EASI-50 and 78.9% EASI-75, especially in those with EASI≥30 and BMI

An in‐depth characterization of the incidence, morphology, and onset of COVID‐19‐vaccines cutaneous adverse reactions is currently lacking. The existing literature on COVID‐19 vaccination‐related cutaneous adverse reactions largely focused on messenger RNA vaccines and mainly included type 1 hypersensitivity reactions, such as urticaria and angioedema. Other cutaneous manifestations are still poorly characterized and have been classified as delayed hypersensitivity rash. Our prospective observational study on a sample of 2740 subjects who underwent the COVID‐19 vaccination aimed at defining the prevalence of cutaneous adverse reactions and at identifying their timing of onset and their correlation with the administered dose. Vaccine‐related cutaneous adverse reactions occurred in 50 subjects. Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire on the type of COVID‐19 vaccine received, the time of onset of cutaneous reactions, and the dates of administration. Out of 2740 individuals who received the COVID‐19 vaccination, 50 were diagnosed with cutaneous adverse reactions to vaccine, after the first dose in 28 patients, after the second in 20, and after both in two. We reported localized injection site erythema in 12 patients and generalized cutaneous reactions in 38 patients. Our study shows that cutaneous adverse reactions to COVID‐19 vaccination are not common and most often occur after the first dose, recurring infrequently after the second dose. These reactions are usually easily manageable and, even in severe generalized cases, oral antihistamines and corticosteroids were sufficient for resolution. Therefore, except for immediate hypersensitivity reactions, cutaneous adverse reactions do not represent a contraindication to the completion of the vaccination cycle.

Introduction: Physicians have largely studied the cutaneous involvement of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but only few reports have focused on telogen effluvium (TE) as a possible sequela of COVID-19. We assessed 14 cases of hair loss occurring after SARS-CoV-2 infection using trichoscopy and trichogram to investigate patterns related to COVID-19. Furthermore, we discussed possible mechanisms involved in COVID-19 TE. Case Presentation: Fourteen individuals were referred to our post-COVID-19 dermatology office complaining acute hair loss after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clinical evaluation included pull test, trichoscopy, and trichogram. CO­VID-19 TE occurred after a median of 2 months (range 1–3 months) following SARS-CoV-2 infection. The median duration of hair loss was 5 months (range 1–6 months). Trichoscopy showed variable but typical TE patterns. Trichogram showed different telogen/anagen ratio depending on the interval between onset of hair loss and trichological visit. Discussion/Conclusion: Our cases showed TE between 1 and 3 months after the onset of SARS-CoV-2 infection, thus earlier than classic TE. Trichoscopic features and trichogram showed no variations from classic TE. Different pathogenetic mechanisms including pro-inflammatory cytokines and direct viral damage on the hair follicle can be hypothesized; further studies on a larger sample are needed to better understand this condition.

Background: Few and small studies have described the management of immunomodulant/immunosuppressive therapies or phototherapy in atopic dermatitis (AD) patients during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: A national registry, named DA-COVID-19 and involving 35 Italian dermatology units, was established in order to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the management of adult AD patients treated with systemic immunomodulant/immunosuppressive medications or phototherapy. Demographic and clinical data were obtained at different timepoints by teledermatology during COVID-19 pandemic, when regular visits were not allowed due to sanitary restrictions. Disease severity was assessed by both physician- and patient-reported assessment scores evaluating itch intensity, sleep disturbances, and AD severity. Results: A total of 1831 patients were included, with 1580/1831 (86.3%) continuing therapy during pandemic. Most patients were treated with dupilumab (86.1%, 1576/1831) that was interrupted in only 9.9% (156/1576) of cases, while systemic immunosuppressive compounds were more frequently withdrawn. Treatment interruption was due to decision of the patient, general practitioner or dermatologist in 39.9% (114/286), 5.6% (16/286), and 30.1% (86/286) of cases, respectively. Fear of increased susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection (24.8%, 71/286) was one of the main causes of interruption. Sixteen patients (0.9%) resulted positive to SARS-CoV-2 infection, 3 of them (0.2%) were hospitalized but no cases of COVID-related death occurred. Conclusions: Most AD patients continued systemic treatments during COVID pandemic and lockdown period, without high impact on disease control, particularly dupilumab-treated patients.

Background: Omalizumab is not considered a disease-modifying drug and, accordingly, a large proportion of patients experience a relapse following withdrawal from treatment. Patients & methods: A total of 42 patients who underwent at least one cycle of treatment with omalizumab were enrolled. Two groups of relapsed and not-relapsed subjects were compared. Then, patients were divided into subgroups. Results: Female patients relapse more frequently than male subjects. Patients who relapsed complained a long duration of disease, while patients who did not relapse had short a history of disease. Very early responders are thought to have a high recurrence rate. Basal IgE levels were increased in early responders and cholesterol levels were high in very early responders, who relapse following withdrawal from omalizumab. High D-dimer levels were observed in late responders. Conclusion: The identification of clinical and serological predictors will play a pivotal role in the future management of patients treated with omalizumab.

Since the new fatal pneumonia was identified in December 2019 in Wuhan, China, the WHO declared the infection a health emergency of international concern. The novel ss‐RNA ß‐coronavirus (SARS‐CoV‐2) spreads through airborne and direct contagion; virulence is high in the elderly and in patients with diabetes, chronic pulmonary, cardiovascular and neoplastic diseases. SARS‐CoV‐2 ssRNA is recognized by intracellular Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRRs), which trigger NF‐kB – the master regulator of inflammation – and Interferon Regulatory Factors (IRFs)1.

The case of a woman who suffered from CSU and prurigo Besnier, with a history of chronic hyper-eosinophilia, ulcerative colitis and thyroiditis, unresponsive to anti-histamines and steroids is reported. The patient received omalizumab treatment, and obtained resolution of urticaria along with improvement of cutaneous symptoms of prurigo.

Background Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic relapsing eczematous dermatitis typically affecting young patients in a percentage from 15 to 20%; although it typically affects young people and adults, recent papers highlighted the emerging of the disease in the elderly population. Methods The aim of the study was to identify the clinical criteria and allergic sensitization that may be able to support physicians and dermatologists in making a correct diagnosis of AD in the elderly. The second aim of this study was to investigate the incidence, the main features, the gender prevalence, the immunological profile, and comorbidities characterizing patients older than 65 years affected by AD. Results Based on clinical and serological patterns, different phenotypes of AD were identified: generalized AD (55%) characterized by eczematous lesions involving typical areas of the body or prurigo nodularis-like AD; chronic eczematous hand dermatitis (23%); face and neck involvement (9%); and nummular eczema (13%). Skin prick tests revealed a positivity for aeroallergens in 49.6% of patients, most of them being polysensitized (55%). Additionally, food skin prick tests were positive in 25% of patients. Most of the patients reported comorbidities, particularly IgE-mediated diseases, such as seasonal rhino-conjunctivitis, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Gastrointestinal symptoms such as meteorism, dyspepsia, cramps/abdominal pain, and diarrhea/constipation, were observed in 35% of patients consequent to food allergy. Conclusion In our study, we suggest clinical and serological criteria that may be able to guide in the diagnosis of AD in Caucasian elderly, and to design an appropriate treatment according to the current standard protocol.

The long-term efficacy and safety of dupilumab has been demonstrated in clinical trials and only in few real-world studies. We conducted an extension analysis from a previous 16-week study on 109 adult patients affected by moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab. Eczema-Area-and-Severity-Index (EASI), itch numerical-rating-score (itch-NRS), Dermatology-Life-Quality-Index (DLQI) scores, drug survival rate and occurrence of adverse events after 24 and 48 weeks of dupilumab treatment were retrospectively collected. Dupilumab demonstrated sustained improvement of disease severity, pruritus, and quality of life in our series with an increasing percentage of patients gaining EASI75 and EASI90 response during the study period. Few patients interrupted treatment resulting in a very high drug survival rate. We also confirmed the favorable safety profile of the drug with absence of serious adverse events and serious infections throughout the 48-week period. The prevalence of conjunctivitis was low and mainly occurred in the mid-term with resolution of the majority of cases at 48 weeks.

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is perceived as a difficult to manage disease with negative impact on quality of life. The aim of this study was to highlight how to improve the care of people with CSU, using the methodology of narrative medicine. From June 2014 to March 2015, CSU-diagnosed patients and their physicians were asked to record their experiences of the condition in writing. Fourteen healthcare teams participated: 41% considered CSU as a challenge to overcome, while 22% experienced CSU as a big commitment. The number of professional involved was evaluated as insufficient in 11 hospitals. Seventy-five percent of the 190 Italian patients had visited 3 or more physicians before receiving a final diagnosis, with a perceived waste of time and resources. The therapeutic pathways were described as unsatisfactory in 83% of cases. As a result, anger and frustration were life-dominant emotions in 92% of patients. The critical points of the care pathway are related to organizational issues and lack of awareness.

Background The prevalence of latex allergy varies according to the population studied from 3% to 64%. No data exist in the present literature about elderly people because they were not considered among populations at risk. We report a retrospective observational study of 88 elderly patients of our centre of Dermatology and Allergology at Policlinico Umberto I, University of Rome, Sapienza. Results First and second level diagnostic tests showed latex positivity in 11,4% of patients studied for latex allergy in the elderly population. Conclusions Our study demonstrates a prevalence of elderly-latex sensitization of 11,4%, showing that allergy to latex is a growing disease that can occur at any age. So, we propose these patients as an additional risk category for latex allergy.

Promethazine hydrochloride is a first-generation H1 receptor antagonist, antihistamine, and antiemetic medication that can also have strong sedative effects. The apparent ability of topical H1r/2r antagonists to target epidermal H1/2r was translated into increased efficacy in the treatment of inflammatory dermatoses, likely due to decreased inflammation and enhanced barrier function.

Systemic contact dermatitis (SCD) can be caused by nickel in sensitized subjects. Nickel allergy is commonly characterized by localized reactions ensuring cutaneous exposure to this element. Systemic reactions can occur after dietary nickel ingestion. We report a case of a woman with Systemic Contact Dermatitis due to nickel.

Topical ketoprofen (KP) is widely used because of its anti-inflammatory effect. Parallel with its popular usage, the number of reported cases of ketoprofen-induced photoallergic contact dermatitis has increased. A review of the literature was made to evaluate the spectrum of cross sensitization in patients with ketoprofen-induced photoallergic contact dermatitis using ketoprofen and other structurally similar chemicals and sunscreens, fragrance components, as well as the presence of prolonged photosensitivity related to it. Furthermore, the distinction between true cross-reactivity and concomitant sensitization may be difficult. Therefore, further investigations are needed to gain a more complete understanding of this important topic. This article also reviews some patents related to alternative treatment of musculoskeletal diseases and/or treatment of allergic reactions due to NSAIDs use.

Sir, the appearance of new elements similar to blue naevus or cavernous hemangioma. Dermal melanocyte hamartoma (DMH) is a rare clinico-pathological entity characterized by the persistSkin biopsies from the large grey-blue patches on his back showed basal hyperpigmentation and slight orthoence of ectopic melanocytes in the dermis after birth (1–6). Related entities are the pilar neurocristic hamarkeratotic hyperkeratosis of the epidermis with normal number of intraepidermal melanocytes. In the upper toma (7) and phakomatosi s pigmentovasculari s type IVa (8, 9), in which the blue-coloured spots are associdermis, a mild perivascular inŽ ltrate was present with many melanophagic histiocytes. In the middle and lower ated with naevus  ammeus. Here, we report a rare case of DMH associated with dermis there were scattered spindle and elongated cells with dusty melanin cytoplasmatic granules disposed along hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy type 2A (HMSN 2A), also known as Charcot Marie Tooth collagen Ž bres (Fig. 2) or focally arranged in perineural and perivascular localization. An immunological test for disease, a neurological disorder with recessive autosomal inheritance, characterized by a demyelinizing peripheral S-100 protein performed with Avidin–Biotin–Complex (DAKO) and Diamino-Benzidine chromogen counneuropathy and progressive myopathy (10). terstained with Giemsa showed the nuclear and cytoplasmic positivity typical of neuro-ectodermal cells with CASE REPORT the green dusty appearance of melanin. The nerve bundles appeared only slightly hypertrophic, with minimal signs A 54-year-old man presented with several congenital pigmented lesions, mottled with small, well-demarcated of onion bulb appearance. This histological picture was consistent with the diagnosis of dermal melanocytosis. macular-papules of a dark-blue colour on the upper trunk and extensor region of the limbs, including hands, According to clinical and histological features we diagnosed a case of DMH. The patient was also aVected by with characteristic mantle distribution (Fig. 1). During childhood the macules had increased in number with a muscle hypotrophy in the forearms and hands, resulting in a claw-like appearance. The distal muscle atrophy of the lower limbs was notable too. There was no family history of neurological symptoms of this disease. The neurological motor disturbance manifested in the eighth year of life with a limp in the left leg. Symptoms worsened progressively, involving the other limbs. An electromyography and electroneurography showed a sensory-motor neuropathy associated with severe axonopathy. It has not been possible to perform the motor evoked potential because of severe muscular

Rivastigmine is a cholinesterase inhibitor which improves cognitive function and is currently being used in patients with mild to moderate Parkinson's and Alzheimer's dementia. This drug can be given orally or topically, as transdermal patch. The latter form is currently used for most excellent compliance and few side effects. The most common cutaneous side effects are irritative dermatitis. We report the second case of active sensitization by the rivastigmine-patch in a patient suffering from Alzheimer's dementia.

Basal keratinocytes reportedly comprise two ultrastructurally recognizable populations, usually referred to as serrated basal keratinocytes (SBK) and non-serrated basal keratinocytes (NSBK). The former are responsible for dermal-epidermal anchoring, whereas the latter serve in epidermal turnover (stem cells). The size and shape of these cells were investigated by electron microscopy and computer-assisted morphometric analysis. The results showed that perimeters of both the nucleus and cytoplasm of NSBK were consistently smaller than those of SBK. The shape factor (contour index) was lower in NSBK, indicating a more regular membrane surface. Present quantitative results substantiate previous subjective reports on the ultrastructural differences between NSBK and SBK and provide additional evidence that the basal cell layer in human epidermis is actually made up of at least two types of morphologically distinct keratinocytes.

Skin findings are common among patients with hematological malignancies and are thought to be expressions of a reactive spectrum peculiar to immunosuppressed patients with an unclear pathogenesis. Eosinophilic panniculitis is a reaction pattern defined by single or multiple lesions consisting in nodules and plaques, and sometimes in papules and pustules, characteristically associated to hematological neoplasms or to a series of benign conditions such as arthropod bites. We report a case of eosinophilic panniculitis occurring in a 77-year-old woman with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Our case is remarkable as the histology of panniculitis was associated with a clinical evidence of dermal papules and a history of insect bites.

Skin tumours represent about 11% of all the malignant neoplasms and their frequency is increasing annually. Skin tumours (melanoma, basal and squamous cell carcinoma, etc.) can be used for a good screening activity, but in relation to breast or cervix uteri cancer needs to be better defined. A test on a population of selected patients against skin malignant neoplasms has been carried out in our Centre. All of them had skin lesions and further checks were necessary.The diagnostic protocol used in our Centre for Oncological Prevention uses the collection of anamnestic data and an objective examination. Between 1996 and 2000, 222 patients between the ages of 18 and 80 have been selected. All of them had suspected skin lesions. The patients were selected by the oncologist, particularly for pigmentation, asymmetry, irregular borders and heterogeneous colour of their skin lesions. Subsequently, the patients were sent for a further examination to the dermatologist oncologist, who on the basis of the objective dermatological examination with possible dermatoscopy, made a clinical diagnosis of the skin injuries or suggested surgical removal for the histological control of the same.Requested consultations: 222. Exami-nations made: 195. Patients considered: 190. Skin injuries examined: 190. The following skin lesions were identified: melanoma: 4 (2.1%) [2: I Clark level; 2: II Clark level]; basal cell carcinoma: 14 (7.37%); dermatofibrosarcoma: 1 (0.53%); keratoacanthoma: 1 (0.53%); dysplastic nevus: 4 (2.1%); actinic keratosis: 7 (3.68%); benign lesions: 159 (83.68%).These data were obtained by a screening program and it is therefore not a random study. This study shows interesting results because tumoral skin lesions and in particular melanoma were recognised at early stages. This is more than enough for us to create a specific screening program for skin lesions to cut down the rate of morbidity and mortality.